一种从大熊猫粪便中提取DNA的改进方法

本研究描述一个改进的方法，使从大熊猫粪便中提取DNA用于PCR扩增变得更加容易。在粪便DNA的提取过程中采用一个新的预处理方法，将粪便用预冷的丙酮洗2～3次，除去粪便中含有的大量PCR抑制物，然后用蛋白酶K裂解、酚氯仿抽提，能提取到纯度很高的DNA供PCR扩增。本实验PCR扩增了大熊猫脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)基因和线粒体细胞色素6基因片段，并进行测序分析，证实了提取的可靠性。对比本方法和未经丙酮预处理的方法提取的DNA进行PCR扩增，前者的扩增结果明显优于后者。     

一种从雉类孵化卵壳中提取DNA的方法

从鸟类已孵化的卵壳中提取DNA属于一种非损伤性取样技术,在鸟类分子生态学研究中具有广阔的应用前景。本实验以河南董寨自然保护区白冠长尾雉(Syrmaticus reevesii)和环颈雉(Phasianuscolchicus)已孵化的卵壳为材料,利用红细胞破碎液、蛋白酶K及RNA酶等试剂,对卵壳膜内的总DNA进行了提取,建立了一种提取高质量DNA的新方法。琼脂糖凝胶电泳检测显示,采用新改进的方法提取出的DNA条带清晰。同时,利用聚合酶链式反应(PCR)技术成功地从总DNA中扩增出两种雉类的线粒体DNA控制区(CR)片段,测序后与GenBank中同一物种的CR序列进行比对,结果证实了PCR产物的真实性。文中利用卵壳膜提取出的DNA,对一窝环颈雉的雏鸟进行了性别鉴定,其结果与根据形态特征进行鉴定的结果完全一致,均为3雄4雌,从而证实了从卵壳膜中提取DNA的真实性。该种DNA提取方法在雉类研究中将具有广泛的应用。     

马蹄金基因组DNA的提取方法比较

对马蹄金基因组DNA的提取方法———快速提取法、小量提取法和大量提取法进行了对比分析,结果表明,利用快速提取法可在20 min内快速可靠地从马蹄金(Dichondra repensForst.)组织中提取DNA,与小量提取法和大量提取法获得的DNA用于PCR检测结果一致,可为转基因植物的快速检测提供方法。     

Chelex-100快速提取放线菌DNA作为PCR扩增模板

旨在建立有效扩增16S rRNA基因序列的放线菌DNA快速提取的方法。采用Chelex-100法提取放线菌DNA,使用PCR扩增16S rRNA基因序列评价提取核酸的质量。结果显示,Chelex-100法能够在10 min之内从放线菌中快速提取DNA,所提取的DNA可以直接用于PCR扩增反应,PCR扩增产物电泳条带清晰,符合理论预期结果。因此,Chelex-100法提取放线菌DNA可以作为16S rRNA基因序列PCR扩增的模板,该方法具有经济、简便、快速的特点,适合于放线菌菌株大规模地筛选和分类鉴定。     

牛肉干中牛基因组DNA提取方法的比较研究

为得到一种快速、稳定、准确、优质的牛肉干DNA的提取方法,本研究比较了SDS法、改良CTAB法、酚-氯仿抽提法以及4种试剂盒提取法的提取效果。通过比较DNA的提取质量、提取效率,并对提取的DNA进行PCR扩增分析。DNA提取结果表明,7种提取方法均能从牛肉干中提取出DNA,其中采用SDS法、酚-氯仿法、试剂盒1法和试剂盒4法所提取的DNA质量较高,A260/A280比值在1.7~1.9之间。试剂盒3法提取所花的时间最少,DNA得率最高,但DNA的纯度最低。PCR扩增结果表明,7种方法所提取的DNA均能满足后续PCR扩增实验的要求。实验室可根据具体的实际情况选择使用DNA提取方法。     

利用CTAB法和子囊孢子破壁法提取冬虫夏草菌DNA

通过CTAB法从冬虫夏草菌株和天然冬虫夏草不同部位提取DNA,并用PCR扩增进行验证,证明了CTAB法适合从冬虫夏草子座、菌核和冬虫夏草菌培养物中提取DNA。首次报道1种将子囊孢子破壁直接进行PCR扩增的方法,并比较了该方法和CTAB法在提取冬虫夏草DNA方面的差异。2种方法获得的DNA用于PCR扩增均能得到较好的结果。     

保存方式和回软温度对蜜蜂标本DNA提取的影响北大核心CSCD

旨在探寻保存方式及制作干标本前回软温度对蜜蜂不同部位DNA的影响。采用酚-氯仿法对不同方式保存的蜜蜂以及不同温度回软后的蜜蜂干标本的总DNA进行提取,通过琼脂糖凝胶电泳和PCR扩增对DNA的提取结果进行鉴定。电泳结果显示,从新鲜标本、无水乙醇泡制或自然干燥保存半年的标本中均可提取到较高质量的总DNA,尤以头部与足部提取效果最佳。经不同水浴温度回软后保存半年的蜜蜂干标本总DNA提取结果显示,回软温度为65℃时对蜜蜂DNA的破坏性最小,DNA提取的最佳部位为蜜蜂足部。正交试验结果显示,55℃回软后的足部为蜜蜂干标本DNA提取的最优组合。PCR扩增结果显示,本实验提取的总DNA能成功地应用于蜜蜂线粒体基因16S rRNA和COI的扩增。从保存方式、提取部位和回软操作3个因素对蜜蜂标本DNA的提取进行了研究,提供了较好的选择方案。     

两种方法制备模板DNA在PCR-SSCP中的应用研究

目的:比较两种方法(DNA试剂盒提取法和FTA卡法)提取的DNA在PCR-SSCP反中的可靠性.方法:用DNA试剂盒从全血中提取DNA和用NaOH方法从FTA卡中提取DNA后,用分光光度计检测两种方法提取DNA的浓度及纯度,进行PCR反应之后,用2％的琼脂糖凝胶电泳检测其质量,接着进行SSCP检测,观测其效果.两种方法提取的样品相同,进行PCR反应和SSCP检测的条件完全一致.结果:用DNA试剂盒提取法和FTA卡法提取的DNA纯度分别为OD260/280=1.817,OD260/280=1.806.48份贵州荷斯坦奶牛DNA后续PCR反应和SSCP的检测结果表明,两种方法提取的DNA用于PCR反应和SSCP检测其效果没有明显差别,成功率为100％.结论:FTA卡结合DNA较稳定,用NaOH法提取DNA效果可靠且比试剂盒方法简便、快捷、经济,值得推广.     

向日葵种子不同部位微量提取DNA用于PCR的研究

探索了从向日葵成熟种子的单粒种子、1/2种子、1/4种子、1/8种子中提取DNA的方法,结果表明,无论是从单粒种子、1/2种子、1/4种子还是1/8种子都能提取质量较好的DNA,对所有提取的DNA,进行RAPD分析,都能得到扩增产物,1/8种子提取的DNA量可保证用于2次PCR扩增。从种子的不同部位提取的DNA与从幼苗中提取的DNA用于RAPD分析,所得结果一致。说明直接从微量向日葵种子提取DNA应用于分子检测是可行的,但直接从向日葵果皮中提取DNA的技术有待进一步研究。     

高温环境样品总DNA直接和间接提取方法的比较

分别采用两种环境总DNA直接提取法和一种间接提取法从6种温泉菌席样品中提取总DNA,以DNA粗产物的纯度、能否用于后续PCR扩增及PCR-DGGE(变性梯度凝胶电泳)所反映的微生物多样性为评价指标对两类方法进行比较和评价。研究发现,虽然间接提取法效率低下,但对于高温极端环境中生物量较小的样品,间接法能得到有研究价值的、纯度较高的环境样品总DNA,而直接法得到的DNA量小且不适于PCR扩增操作。在使用这2类方法都能得到可用于研究操作的DNA的情况下,间接提取法能更好的体现环境样品中微生物的多样性。     

Evaluation of three methods for effective extraction of DNA from human hair

In this paper we evaluate three different methods for extracting DNA from human hair i.e. the Chelex method, the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit method and the ISOHAIR method. Analysis of DNA prepared from dyed hairs with the ISOHAIR method suggested that the DNA extracts contained PCR inhibitors. On the other hand, few inhibition was observed when DNA from dyed hairs were extracted using the Chelex method and the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit method. In conclusion, the Chelex method is recommended for PCR experiments in view of its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. To assess the reliability of the Chelex method for the extraction of genomic DNA from both natural and dyed hair samples, minisatellite variant repeat (MVR)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) patterns of Chelex-extracted DNA were compared using hairs (three natural black hairs and three dyed hairs) with buccal swabs from six individuals. Complete agreement was observed between hair and swab samples in each individual, proving the utility of the Chelex method.     

适于涡虫基因组DNA快速制备的改良的CTAB法

提取得到高质量的DNA样品是进行分子生物学研究的必要前提。为了找到一种适用于提取涡虫基因组DNA的常规方法,我们以东亚三角头涡虫为材料,分别用改良的CTAB法、SDS法、SDS-蛋白酶K法对涡虫的基因组DNA进行了制备,并对3种方法制备的涡虫基因组DNA进行了检测与比较。根据比较结果,我们认为改良的CTAB法最适合于涡虫基因组DNA的快速制备,为涡虫的分子生物学研究打下了基础。     

快速提取肠道微生物基因组DNA的方法

目的:肠道微生物的研究日益成为热点,如何获取高质量、较完整的肠道菌群基因组DNA是肠道微生物研究中的关键。本文通过对酚/氯仿法提取总DNA过程进行考察和优化,建立一种简便酚/氯仿抽提法。方法:考察和优化酚/氯仿法提取总DNA的过程,并根据DNA产量、纯度以及ERIC-PCR及16S rNDA-RFLP所反映的微生物群落结构特性的指标,并与QIAamp?DNA Stool Mini Kit提取的进行比较,评价了所建立的快速提取方法。结果:用简便酚/氯仿法得到基本完整的基因组DNA,ERIC-PCR和16S rDNA-RFLP结果与QIAamp?DNA Stool Mini Kit法基本相同。结论:该方法快速并成本低,适合肠道微生物研究中总DNA提取,尤其适合处理大批量的样品。     

An evaluation of techniques for the extraction and amplification of DNA from naturally shed hairs

Hair can be a valuable source of DNA for the noninvasive study of human and nonhuman populations. However, hairs contain extremely small quantities of DNA, making the method used to extract the DNA of paramount importance. This study compares the effectiveness of 4 different methods of DNA extraction from shed chimpanzee hair, as measured by the ability to amplify mtDNA targets using PCR. The most successful method is also the simplest, requiring only digestion of the root end in a buffer compatible with subsequent PCR without a prior purification or extraction step. Strategies to non-specifically preamplify the template are not successful with DNA from stored shed hairs.     

短尾猴陈旧粪便中DNA的提取

分子粪便学（Molecular scatology）是一门将传统粪便分析方法与分子生物学技术相结合,以动物粪便为实验材料进行多领域研究的学科（魏辅等,2001）。虽然该方法已在野生濒危动物保护遗传学和分子生态学研究中发挥了很大作用（Kohnand Wayne,1997）,但目前大多数分子粪便学研究中使用的材料是新鲜粪便,从保存时间很长的陈旧粪便中很难提取到高质量的DNA用于PCR扩增以及序列分析,严重制约了分子粪便学的广泛应用（Wasser et al．,1997;Constable et al．,2001;Murphy et al．．2002）。     

Chelex-100法及酚氯仿法提取阴道毛滴虫DNA的比较

目的-比较Chelex-100法和酚氯仿法提取阴道毛滴虫基因组DNA。方法-分别用Chelex-100法和酚氯仿法提取阴道毛滴虫基因组DNA,用PCR法检测DNA提取的有效性。结果两种方法提取的DNA经PCR扩增均有特定的条带。结论-两种方法均能提取阴道毛滴虫DNA。Chelex-100方法简便、省时,较适用于分子生物学研究及临床PCR扩增使用。     

人头发DNA的提取及其基因扩增

头发是犯罪现场最容易得到的材料之一。本文报道从人的头发中提取DNA的方法以及利用PCR(聚合酶链反应)技术,从少量人发DNA扩增大量拷贝数的基因片段。对基因扩增得到的大量基因片段进行进一步的基因分析,将为法医物证学提供客观证据,具有重要价值。     

A new method for DNA extraction from feces and hair shafts of the South China tiger (Panthera tigris amoyensis)

It is commonly known that tigers (Panthera tigris) groom themselves by licking their coats, which leads to an abundance of hairs in their feces. These hairs are designated specially as “fecal hairs”. In our study, in order to explore fecal hairs potential as a DNA source for genetic analysis, 55 fecal hair samples were collected from 23 captive South China tigers (P. t. amoyensis). According to the amplification of mitochondrial primers loop F and loop R, DNA quality of noninvasive samples were grouped into three grades: grade I—the highest-quality DNA, grade II—high-quality DNA, and grade III—poor-quality DNA. No failed amplifications on microsatellite primers and only 0.27% genotyping errors occurred with grade I fecal hair DNA, as compared with 9.4% failed amplifications on microsatellite primers and 9.5% genotyping errors with grade II fecal hair DNA. It was found that 25.45% of fecal hair DNA was grade I and 65.45 and 10.00% of fecal hair DNA were grades II and III, respectively, as compared with 4.35% grade I fecal DNA and 34.78 and 60.87% grades II and III fecal DNA, respectively. Thus, higher-quality DNA can be extracted from fecal hairs than feces. In addition, DNA could be extracted from hair shafts of tigers and a minimum of 2000 hair shafts were required for visible DNA bands on a 1% agarose gel. These findings demonstrate that fecal hairs may serve as a convenient and reliable genomic DNA source for genotype analysis. Zoo Biol 28:49–58, 2009. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Plucked hair samples as a source of DNA: reliability of dinucleotide microsatellite genotyping

To test whether plucked hairs are a reliable source of DNA for genotyping microsatellite loci, we carried out experiments using one, three, or 10 hairs per extract for 50 alpine marmots. For each extract, seven independent genotypings were performed for the same locus (multiple-tubes approach). Two types of genotyping errors were recorded: a false homozygote defined as the detection of only one allele of a true heterozygote, and a false allele defined as a PCR-generated allele that was not one of the alleles of the true genotype. Using DNA extracted from one, three, or 10 hairs, the overall error rate was 14.00%, 4.86%, and 0.29%, respectively. Based on our results, we conclude that 10 hairs should be used to obtain consistently reliable genotypings using the single-tube approach, and that a single plucked hair could represent a reliable source of DNA if the multiple-tubes approach is used. For future studies of dinucleotide repeat diversity using DNA extracted from one to three shed or plucked hairs, we strongly recommend initiating an appropriate pilot study to quantify the error rate and to determine the reliability of the single-tube approach.     

火龙果茎基因组DNA提取方法改良

火龙果(Hylocereus undulatus)是近年发展起来的一种新兴热带水果, 其茎富含多糖、多酚及其它次生代谢物, 黏性极大, 很难从中提取高质量的DNA。特别是一年生以上的老茎, 目前尚未有较好的DNA提取方法。为了解决这一难题, 该研究对CTAB+Tris-HCl洗涤法进行了3种方式的改良。结果表明, “改进三”方法可不受取样时期和取样部位的限制, 从一年生以上火龙果茎中提取的DNA质量最好且不含黏性物质, 可用于酶切与分子标记等生化和分子生物学实验。该研究探索了一条较为理想的火龙果茎DNA提取方法, 值得推广应用。