一种适于微生物多样性分析的青贮饲料总DNA的提取方法

目的:提出一种适于微生物多样性分析的青贮饲料中微生物总DNA的提取方法,并评价其效果.方法:间接法抽提样本的总DNA,通过琼脂糖电泳、紫外吸收及PCR分析DNA质量,DGGE评价提取效果,用PCR扩增目的菌株的特定片段来检测提取方法的灵敏度.结果:两个样本DNA的A260/A280值分别为1.99和1.93,A260/,A230值分别为2.19和1.90,提取的DNA不需纯化便可直接用于16S rRNA基因的扩增,提取方法灵敏度为3cfu/g,DGGE结果表明提取方法可以涵盖样品中的所有微生物.结论:提取的DNA纯度较高,可直接用于下游分子操作,提取方法灵敏度较高,能全面反映样品中的微生物原貌,可用于免培养法研究青贮饲料中的微生物菌群组成.     

狮子头热泉菌席样品环境总DNA提取方法的比较研究

通过对狮子头热泉7个环境菌席样品所提取的总DNA进行纯度检测、提取得率计算和DGGE分析,比较了3种直接和1种间接DNA提取方法。结果表明：综合利用多种裂解方式比单一裂解方式更能充分释放环境DNA;其中3种方法获得的DNA片段能够进行后续16S rDNA扩增;针对同一样品,不同方法提取的环境DNA,可获得不同DGGE群落指纹图谱;间接提取法提取的总DNA,能更好地反映狮子头热泉菌席的微生物多样性。     

两种从土壤中提取DNA方法的比较

为土壤微生物多样性研究选取理想的DNA提取方法,该文比较了直接法和间接法从土壤中提取微生物总DNA的效果。结果表明：直接法提取量大,每克土壤提取到DNA约10．26μg,而间接法仅提取到0．55μg,直接法DNA提取量约为间接法的19倍。直接法得到的DNA包含细菌种群较间接法丰富,DGGE分析结果显示,二者的条带数分别为35条和28条,占检测条带总数的92．1%和78．9%。间接法提取到DNA纯度较直接法高,不需纯化即可用于PCR扩增和BamHⅠ酶切反应。     

三种土壤微生物总DNA提取方法的比较

本文对3种常用的土壤微生物总DNA提取方法Martin法、高盐改进法及试剂盒法进行了比较,并通过DNA得率、纯度及16S rDNA V3可变区的PCR扩增结合DGGE法(denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis),分别对3种方法进行评价.结果表明,3种方法提取的DNA均能满足土壤微生物多样性分析的要求.其中试剂盒方法操作简单,提取的DNA质量较高,但DNA得率较低且成本昂贵.Martin法和高盐改进法用时较长,DNA得率较高,纯度较低,但对后续PCR扩增和DGGE分析没有明显影响,且成本低廉.     

两种提取肠道微生物总DNA方法的比较

目的比较肠道微生物总DNA两种提取方法的优缺点。方法采用苯酚-氯仿抽提法和试剂盒法提取肠道微生物总DNA,比较其作为模板扩增细菌16S DNA的优缺点。结果两种方法提取的细菌DNA均能用于后续PCR扩增的模板。酚-氯仿抽提法经济可靠,但提取的DNA量及纯度较低试;剂盒法提取方便,操作简单,质量稳定,易标准化,但成本高。结论两种方法各具优缺点,应根据实验室条件和实验要求进行选择。     

小鼠胚胎胃肠道细菌基因组DNA提取方法比较

目的:筛选能均衡地提取小鼠胚胎胃肠道微生物区系各种细菌总DNA的方法.方法:分别采用反复冻融法、CTAB -SDS法、柱式基因组DNA提取试剂盒法提取小鼠胚胎胃肠道细菌基因组DNA,对其进行琼脂糖凝胶电泳、紫外分光光度计测定、PCR扩增等质量检测.结果:CTAB -SDS方法提取的基因组DNA纯度较高,OD260/OD280平均值最高,为1.845,电泳条带清晰,能满足下游的PCR扩增等分子操作.结论:确定CTAB -SDS方法为提取小鼠胚胎胃肠道细菌基因组DNA的最佳方法,为研究不同种动物胚胎的肠道菌群的结构和多样性奠定了基础.     

沼气池污泥微生物总DNA提取方法的比较

沼气发酵系统是一个复杂的生态系统,其污泥微生物超过99%是不可培养的。为了优化沼气池纤维素的转化效率、沼气的产率和开展污泥微生物多样性研究,本研究采用化学裂解法、溶菌酶裂解法和QIAampDNA Stool Mini Kit提取了沼气池污泥样品中微生物的总DNA,对三种方法的DNA得率、纯度、大片段提取效果以及是否含有PCR反应抑制剂进行了研究,最后对16S rRNA基因V3区的扩增产物进行了PCR变性梯度凝胶电泳(PCR-DGGE)分析。与化学裂解法和QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit法相比,溶菌酶裂解法得到的DNA量大、片段长、片段分布广、PCR扩增效率高;同时PCR-DGGE图谱显示,溶菌酶裂解法可更好地展示沼气池污泥中微生物的多样性。该结果为进一步提高沼气池中纤维素的转化效率和沼气生产优势菌种的质和量打下了一定的前期基础。     

一种快速提取细菌总DNA的方法研究

随着分子生物学技术应用于环境微生物研究的深入开展,占自然界微生物物种总数的90%以上的不能人工培养或培养困难的微生物已经可以借助分子生物学技术进行功能基因的开发和利用。而快速得到纯度较高,结构完整的细菌染色体DNA成为这一技术得以实现的前提。本文报道了利用高温处理和SDS的裂解作用相结合而建立的一种快速、简便的提取细菌染色体DNA的方法。经过脉冲电泳实验证明,利用本方法提取得到的几种革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性菌株的基因组DNA结构完整,并且无明显降解,无须经过纯化,可以直接进行PCR扩增和酶切等分子生物学操作,将此方法进一步应用于土壤环境DNA的提取方面,同样达到了快速得到大片段、高质量的环境微生物基因组的目的,为研究未培养的环境微生物多样性打下了坚实的基础,同时为环境基因组的提取提供了一个新的途径。     

油气田土壤DNA提取方法及油气指示菌基因定量结果的比较

采用4种提取方法对油田上方6个土壤样品微生物总基因组DNA进行提取,并比较了其纯度和浓度。利用定量PCR技术定量分析各土壤中甲烷单加氧酶基因（pmoA）和丁烷单加氧酶基因（brnoX）。与DNA试剂盒法相比,玻璃珠击打法、液氮研磨法、反复冻融法得到DNA纯度较低,需纯化才能进行后续的PCR扩增。液氮研磨法得到的DNA完整性、纯度和得率较其他提取方法均较好,尤其对于生物量较少的深层油田土壤DNA提取较为实用,成本较低。甲烷单加氧酶基因（pmoA）和丁烷单加氧酶基因（bmoX）的定量PCR结果表明,液氮研磨法提取DNA样品的定量结果在气区和油区均出现一定的高值。液氮研磨法较其他方法更适合于油田土壤DNA的提取。下一步研究可以把丁烷氧化茵作为油气指示茵研究中的重点检测对象。     

风沙土微生物总DNA不同提取和纯化方法比较

为筛选和建立风沙土中总DNA的提取和纯化方法,选取了5种直接提取法、1种间接提取法和2种纯化法分别对风沙土中总DNA进行了提取和纯化,并对其质量和产量进行了比较.结果表明：6种方法均可从风沙土中提取到大小为23 kb左右的总DNA,其中改进后的高盐提取法（用40%聚乙二醇8000和4 mol·L^-1 NaCl沉淀DNA）效果最好,纯化后总DNA的纯度最高,可进行16S rDNA的PCR扩增,且产量仅稍低于试剂盒提取法;电泳加柱回收纯化法的纯化效果较好,经该方法纯化后的总DNA大部分可进行PCR扩增,可满足后续分子操作对DNA纯度的要求.     

Efficiency of DNA extraction methods on the evaluation of soil microeukaryotic diversity

The evaluation of microbial molecular diversity has been mainly based on the extraction of total DNA from environmental samples. The indirect extraction methods, which have been used for prokaryotes, have never been used to recover soil microeukaryotic DNA. We evaluated the efficiency of an improved indirect DNA extraction protocol developed herein and the direct lysis (the sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-based method and commercial DNA extraction kit) on estimating the molecular diversity of soil microbial eukaryotes. DNA quality and quantity as well as denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiles were determined using three soil samples from different stations. The indirect method detected the highest DGGE bands in spite of the low DNA yield. The commercial kit detected a lower number of DGGE bands than the indirect method. The SDS-based method produced the lowest DGGE bands and DNA purity but the highest yield. Using the indirect method, we further evaluated the effect of freezing and air-dried preservations on estimating the microeukaryotic diversity. In spite of the low DNA yield obtained from the air-dried preservation, no significant differences were found in either the number of DGGE bands or the DNA purity between two manners. Our results indicate that the improved indirect method could obtain a high purity of intracellular DNA and high efficiency in the estimation of molecular diversity of soil microbial eukaryotes.     

用于分析土壤微生物结构变化规律的变性梯度凝胶电泳条件研究

研究确定土壤微生物基因组DNA提取方法、PCR扩增条件、DGGE电泳条件,为进一步研究分析土壤中微生物结构变化规律提供理论依据。土壤微生物基因组DNA提取采用直接法和间接法进行比较; PCR扩增条件调整扩增体系、DGGE电泳条件调整变性剂范围,并对其结果进行比较分析。通过对DGGE电泳相关条件的研究,结果显示,土壤中粗基因组DNA采用直接法提取,然后进行纯化; PCR扩增体系中加入BSA,DGGE电泳系统组成中变性剂浓度范围为35%～55%。确定了土壤微生物基因组DNA提取方法、PCR扩增条件、DGGE电泳条件,为后续的相关研究提供理论依据。     

A simple method of DNA extraction from soil for detection of composite transgenic plants by PCR

This new and simple method of DNA extraction from composite soil allows the isolation of plant DNA with high efficiency, quality and reproductivity. The method is based on a simple CaCl₂-precipitation step and requires no additional purification steps to eliminate humic acids. The extracted DNA was obtained in sufficient purity and quantity to allow direct detection of transgenes by PCR. Furthermore, the simple procedure allows the assay of many samples at the same time.     

Comparison of rapid methods for the extraction of bacterial DNA from colonic and caecal lumen contents of the pig

AIMS: The increasing uses of DNA methodologies to study the micro flora of the pig gastrointestinal tract requires an efficient recovery of bacterial DNA from the intestinal sample. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine which DNA extraction methods are most effective for luminal samples from pigs. Several routinely used nucleic acid extraction procedures were compared based upon quantity and purity of extracted DNA. METHODS AND RESULTS: DNA was extracted from pig colonic and caecal lumen samples using 19 methods for bacterial DNA extraction. The quantity of total DNA recovered by each extraction method was determined and compared. Two methods using extraction with polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP) or phenol and two methods involving bead mill homogenization were found to provide the greatest quantity of extracted DNA for both colonic and caecal lumen. Extracted DNA from these four methods was further analysed for purity based upon the presence of PCR inhibitors, which was ascertained by determining the efficiency of amplification of a segment of the 16S rDNA. PCR amplification could be readily achieved with DNA extracted by each of these four methods, but efficiency of amplification tended to be higher with DNA from two of the methods (one extracted with PVPP and one with bead mill homogenization). CONCLUSIONS: Four extraction methods proved to be significantly superior in quantity of DNA extracted from luminal samples. Of these four, no strong inhibitors of PCR amplification were detected in any of the extracted DNA. However, the efficiency of amplification tended to be lower in DNA samples from two of the methods, suggesting the presence of low levels of PCR inhibitors. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Results of this study provide a basis for choosing which DNA extraction procedures are most effective for use with samples of pig lumen.     

Different influences of DNA purity indices and quantity on PCR-based DGGE and functional gene microarray in soil microbial community study

Based on the comparative study of the DNA extracts from two soil samples obtained by three commercial DNA extraction kits, we evaluated the influence of the DNA quantity and purity indices (the absorbance ratios A260/280 and A260/230, as well as the absorbance value A320 indicating the amount of humic substances) on polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and a functional gene microarray used in the study of microbial communities. Numbers and intensities of the DGGE bands are more affected by the A260/280 and A320 values than by the ratio A260/230 and conditionally affected by the DNA yield. Moreover, we demonstrated that the DGGE band pattern was also affected by the preferential extraction due to chemical agents applied in the extraction. Unlike DGGE, microarray is more affected by the A260/230 and A320 values. Until now, the successful PCR performance is the mostly used criterion for soil DNA purity. However, since PCR was more influenced by the A260/280 ratio than by A260/230, it is not accurate enough any more for microbial community assessed by non-PCR-based methods such as microarray. This study provides some useful hints on how to choose effective DNA extraction method for the subsequent assessment of microbial community.     

两种外周血 DNA 提取方法的比较

目的:外周血DNA的提取是研究乙型肝炎病毒相关临床疾病的基础,所提取DNA的质与量直接关乎下游研究的成败,经济、高效、便捷的外周血DNA提取方法对于疾病分子水平的研究尤为重要,本实验旨在比较两种外周血DNA提取方法,从而为临床研究提供有力的参考。方法:以外周抗凝血为试验样本,分别采用改良盐析法和DNA提取试剂盒法(硅胶柱纯化)进行基因组DNA的提取,通过分光光度仪测量DNA浓度和纯度,并进行PCR扩增及电泳实验。比较改良盐析法与试剂盒提取法(硅胶柱纯化)的效果。结果:试剂盒提取法(硅胶柱纯化)标本用量甚微,省时,提取DNA纯度高,步骤繁琐,PCR条带单一、亮度差;改良盐析法操作步骤少,提取DNA浓度高,PCR条带亮度佳、杂带多,耗时长。结论:两组方法各有优缺点,试剂盒提取法(硅胶柱纯化)可靠、快速,但所获DNA量少、极易降解,改良盐析法耗时,但所获DNA浓度高、量多,可根据实验时间与经费,实验所需的DNA纯度与浓度,提供的样本体积等不同的临床研究需求及条件来综合选择适宜的提取方法。     

PCR-DGGE技术在农田土壤微生物多样性研究中的应用

变性梯度凝胶电泳技术(DGGE)在微生物生态学领域有着广泛的应用。研究采用化学裂解法直接提取出不同农田土壤微生物基因组DNA,并以此基因组DNA为模板,选择特异性引物F357GC和R515对16S rRNA基因的V3区进行扩增,长约230bp的PCR产物经变性梯度凝胶电泳(DGGE)进行分离后,得到不同数目且分离效果较好的电泳条带。结果说明,DGGE能够对土壤样品中的不同微生物的16S rRNA基因的V3区的DNA扩增片断进行分离,为这些DNA片断的定性和鉴定提供了条件。与传统的平板培养方法相比,变性梯度凝胶电泳(DGGE)技术能够更精确的反映出土壤微生物多样性,它是一种有效的微生物多样性研究技术。     

Comparison of Metagenomic DNA Extraction Methods for Soil Sediments of High Elevation Puga Hot Spring in Ladakh,India to Explore Bacterial Diversity

Extraction of good-quality metagenomic DNA from extreme environments is quite challenging, particularly from high elevation hot spring sediments. Low microbial load, high humic acid content and other contaminants complicate the process of extraction of metagenomic DNA from hot spring sediments. In the present study, efficacy of five manual DNA extraction protocols with modifications has been evaluated for metagenomic DNA extraction from boron–sulfur rich high elevation Puga hot spring sediments. Best suited protocol was identified based on the cell lysis efficiency, DNA yield, humic acid content, PCR reproducibility and representation of bacterial diversity. Quantity as well as quality of crude metagenomic DNA differed remarkably between various protocols used and were not pure enough to give PCR amplification using 16S rRNA bacterial and archaeal primers. Crude metagenomic DNA extracted using five different DNA extraction protocols was purified using spin column based purification method. Even after purification, only three protocols C, D and E yielded metagenomic DNA that could be amplified using both archaeal and bacterial primers. To evaluate the degree of microbial diversity represented by protocols C, D and E, phylogenetic genes amplified were subjected to amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis (DGGE) analysis. ARDRA banding pattern of amplicons generated for all the three extraction protocols, i.e., C, D and E were found to be similar. DGGE of protocol E derived amplicons resulted in the similar number of dominant bands but a greater number of non-dominant bands, i.e., the highest microbial diversity in comparison to protocols C and D, respectively. In the present study, protocol E developed from Yeates et al. protocol has been found to be best in terms of DNA yield, DNA purity and bacterial diversity depiction associated with boron–sulfur rich sediment of high elevation hot springs.