一种通用的基因组DNA提取方法

目的:探讨一种通厢的基因组DNA提取方法.方法:采用改良的膜法分别从动植物组织、外周血、细菌、细胞等标本提取基因组DNA,DNA样品经紫外吸收、琼脂糖凝胶电泳、PCR扩增和酶切进行榆测.结果:该方法提取的基因组DNA纯度较高,电泳条带清晰,DNA质量能满足下游分子生物学研究的需要.结论:该方法简便快速、适用范围广,是提取基因组DNA的一种有效方法.     

大鼠肠内容物细菌基因组DNA提取方法的比较

目的比较两种肠内容物前处理和两种提取方法对清洁级SD大鼠肠内容物细菌基因组DNA提取效率。方法分别选用PBS多次离心漂洗、液氮破细胞两种前处理方法和酚/氯仿抽提、试剂盒过柱法两种提取方法进行组合分析,对4份肠内容物和16份含金黄色葡萄球菌肠内容物进行随机提取。结果大鼠肠内容物细菌基因组DNA含量和纯度测定结果显示,与PBS反复离心相比,液氮研磨前处理能显著提高大鼠肠内容物基因组DNA。荧光定量PCR表明,液氮研磨前处理较PBS反复离心能更好地收集细菌基因组DNA,其Ct值最低。结论研究结果表明,采用液氮研磨试剂盒法在大鼠肠内容物DNA提取中是较为优良的方法,该方法为建立实验动物中微生物的定量PCR检测方法打下了基础。     

人类肠道菌群DNA提取影响因素的研究

目的研究提取人类粪便中细菌基因组DNA的影响因素。方法采用溶菌酶和十二烷基磺酸钠(SDS)+石英砂+酚-氯仿抽提法提取粪便标本中细菌DNA,用PCR扩增细菌16SrDNA。比较不同粪便量,不同放置时间,不同放置温度下的粪便细菌DNA浓度及纯度改变;用Chao index评测高通量测序的结果。结果采用20mg粪便量提取出的细菌DNA的浓度最高;常温下放置3h后,提取的细菌DNA的浓度开始下降;在-20℃放置12h后,细菌DNA的浓度开始下降;-70℃放置48h后细菌DNA的浓度开始下降;样品纯度均在1.8以上;Chao index曲线趋于平缓表明测序数据量足够大。结论提取肠道细菌基因组DNA时,粪便标本取样量以20mg为宜,常温下粪便标本放置不超过2h,本研究所使用的方法所提取的DNA浓度可以达到高通量测序的样本要求。     

氯化苄法提取染色体DNA

本文介绍了一种简便、快速提取细菌和真菌的基因组DNA的方法一氯化苄法。使用氯化苄法抽提基因组DNA,不仅具有快迅、简便、耗资少的优点;而且得到的基因组DNA纯度高,质量好,可直接用于酶切、杂交和PCR扩增等用途。该法可用于多种细菌和真菌基因组DNA的提取。     

两种提取肠道微生物总DNA方法的比较

目的比较肠道微生物总DNA两种提取方法的优缺点。方法采用苯酚-氯仿抽提法和试剂盒法提取肠道微生物总DNA,比较其作为模板扩增细菌16S DNA的优缺点。结果两种方法提取的细菌DNA均能用于后续PCR扩增的模板。酚-氯仿抽提法经济可靠,但提取的DNA量及纯度较低试;剂盒法提取方便,操作简单,质量稳定,易标准化,但成本高。结论两种方法各具优缺点,应根据实验室条件和实验要求进行选择。     

小鼠胚胎胃肠道细菌基因组DNA提取方法比较

目的:筛选能均衡地提取小鼠胚胎胃肠道微生物区系各种细菌总DNA的方法.方法:分别采用反复冻融法、CTAB -SDS法、柱式基因组DNA提取试剂盒法提取小鼠胚胎胃肠道细菌基因组DNA,对其进行琼脂糖凝胶电泳、紫外分光光度计测定、PCR扩增等质量检测.结果:CTAB -SDS方法提取的基因组DNA纯度较高,OD260/OD280平均值最高,为1.845,电泳条带清晰,能满足下游的PCR扩增等分子操作.结论:确定CTAB -SDS方法为提取小鼠胚胎胃肠道细菌基因组DNA的最佳方法,为研究不同种动物胚胎的肠道菌群的结构和多样性奠定了基础.     

一种适用于PCR反应的酵母菌、无绿藻及丝状真菌DNA提取方法

目的 介绍一种从酵母、无绿藻及丝状真菌中提取DNA以用于PCR反应的方法。方法 所用菌种包括临床分离的未知菌株和保藏菌株共23株：未知酵母菌（5株）、真皮毛孢子菌（1株）、糠秕马拉色菌（1株）、季也蒙念珠菌（5株）、未知丝状真菌（6株）、无绿藻（1株）、烟曲霉（2株）、拟青霉菌（1株）、茎点霉（1株）。用溶细胞酶（lyticase）结合Biospin真菌基因组DNA提取试剂盒提取基因组DNA,A260／A280检测纯度并计算质量浓度,用真菌通用引物ITS1／ITS4扩增真菌核糖体基因（rDNA）内转录间区ITS基因,经PCR扩增检验所提取的DNA质量。结果 成功提取所有23株真菌基因组DNA,其纯度及质量浓度能满足PCR反应的要求。结论 用溶细胞酶结合Biospin真菌基因组DNA提取试剂盒从酵母菌、无绿藻及丝状真菌提取的DNA可用于PCR反应。     

一种从大熊猫粪便中提取DNA的改进方法

本研究描述一个改进的方法，使从大熊猫粪便中提取DNA用于PCR扩增变得更加容易。在粪便DNA的提取过程中采用一个新的预处理方法，将粪便用预冷的丙酮洗2～3次，除去粪便中含有的大量PCR抑制物，然后用蛋白酶K裂解、酚氯仿抽提，能提取到纯度很高的DNA供PCR扩增。本实验PCR扩增了大熊猫脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)基因和线粒体细胞色素6基因片段，并进行测序分析，证实了提取的可靠性。对比本方法和未经丙酮预处理的方法提取的DNA进行PCR扩增，前者的扩增结果明显优于后者。     

高温环境样品总DNA直接和间接提取方法的比较

分别采用两种环境总DNA直接提取法和一种间接提取法从6种温泉菌席样品中提取总DNA,以DNA粗产物的纯度、能否用于后续PCR扩增及PCR-DGGE(变性梯度凝胶电泳)所反映的微生物多样性为评价指标对两类方法进行比较和评价。研究发现,虽然间接提取法效率低下,但对于高温极端环境中生物量较小的样品,间接法能得到有研究价值的、纯度较高的环境样品总DNA,而直接法得到的DNA量小且不适于PCR扩增操作。在使用这2类方法都能得到可用于研究操作的DNA的情况下,间接提取法能更好的体现环境样品中微生物的多样性。     

4种黑曲霉基因组DNA提取方法的比较

目的:筛选适合提取曲霉DNA的方法.方法:比较2个菌落培养时间段(3d内和10d左右)提取DNA质量的差异;运用氯化苄法、石英砂+CTAB法、Biospin法和微波法分别提取黑曲霉基因组DNA,然后用直接电泳、浓度测定、PCR扩增等方法比较所提DNA的浓度和质量.结果:培养3d内的菌落提取的DNA纯度较高,无需纯化即可用于后续实验;4种方法制备的DNA均可用于PCR等后续实验,其中以石英砂+CTAB法提取的DNA纯度好,产率最高.结论石英砂+CTAB法是一种适用于曲霉DNA提取的简便方法.     

内参基因加标法定量土壤微生物目标基因绝对拷贝数

【目的】通过荧光定量PCR技术对土壤微生物目标基因进行绝对定量,其定量结果的准确性容易受到DNA提取得率以及腐殖酸抑制性的影响。【方法】采用内参基因加标法,利用构建的突变质粒DNA,对供试水稻土壤样品中的微生物16S r RNA目标基因的绝对拷贝数进行荧光定量PCR检测,用来表征该样品中细菌群落总体丰度。在定量前通过双向引物扩增方法验证突变质粒中的内参基因对供试土壤的特异性。【结果】不同水稻土壤样品的DNA提取量在样品间差异较大。通过内参基因加标法对DNA提取量进行校正,显著提高了16S r RNA基因绝对定量的精确度。不同水稻土壤样品间的变异系数为17.8,与未加标处理相比降低了66.7%。在此基础上,进一步通过内参基因加标法对土壤有机质和含水率均呈现典型空间特征差异的6处亚热带湿地土壤样品中的16S r RNA基因进行绝对定量。16S r RNA基因绝对拷贝数与土壤微生物生物量碳具有显著的线性相关性(R2=0.694,P0.001),表明内参校正后的16S r RNA基因绝对拷贝数可以准确反映单位质量土壤中微生物的丰度。【结论】内参基因加标法可以对DNA提取得率以及腐殖酸对PCR扩增的抑制性进行校正,从而提高绝对定量的准确性。基于内参基因加标法的目标基因绝对定量PCR检测,可作为土壤微生物生物量测量,以及微生物功能基因绝对丰度定量的一种核酸检测方法。     

湿地土壤微生物DNA提取及其脱腐技术

DNA分子生物学技术的广泛应用,为全面了解微生物群落提供了有力的工具。本文建立了一种新的从湿地土壤中提取微生物总DNA的方法,即氯化钙-SDS-酶法。在直接提取DNA过程中采用氯化钙去除腐殖酸,DNA提取缓冲液中不使用EDTA螯合剂,提取过程用时4h左右。与其他两种方法相比,该方法高效去除湿地土壤腐殖酸,纯度较高,满足PCR扩增,为微生物生态学研究提供了一种高效的湿地土壤微生物总DNA提取和纯化技术。     

油气田土壤DNA提取方法及油气指示菌基因定量结果的比较

采用4种提取方法对油田上方6个土壤样品微生物总基因组DNA进行提取,并比较了其纯度和浓度。利用定量PCR技术定量分析各土壤中甲烷单加氧酶基因（pmoA）和丁烷单加氧酶基因（brnoX）。与DNA试剂盒法相比,玻璃珠击打法、液氮研磨法、反复冻融法得到DNA纯度较低,需纯化才能进行后续的PCR扩增。液氮研磨法得到的DNA完整性、纯度和得率较其他提取方法均较好,尤其对于生物量较少的深层油田土壤DNA提取较为实用,成本较低。甲烷单加氧酶基因（pmoA）和丁烷单加氧酶基因（bmoX）的定量PCR结果表明,液氮研磨法提取DNA样品的定量结果在气区和油区均出现一定的高值。液氮研磨法较其他方法更适合于油田土壤DNA的提取。下一步研究可以把丁烷氧化茵作为油气指示茵研究中的重点检测对象。     

Different influences of DNA purity indices and quantity on PCR-based DGGE and functional gene microarray in soil microbial community study

Based on the comparative study of the DNA extracts from two soil samples obtained by three commercial DNA extraction kits, we evaluated the influence of the DNA quantity and purity indices (the absorbance ratios A260/280 and A260/230, as well as the absorbance value A320 indicating the amount of humic substances) on polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and a functional gene microarray used in the study of microbial communities. Numbers and intensities of the DGGE bands are more affected by the A260/280 and A320 values than by the ratio A260/230 and conditionally affected by the DNA yield. Moreover, we demonstrated that the DGGE band pattern was also affected by the preferential extraction due to chemical agents applied in the extraction. Unlike DGGE, microarray is more affected by the A260/230 and A320 values. Until now, the successful PCR performance is the mostly used criterion for soil DNA purity. However, since PCR was more influenced by the A260/280 ratio than by A260/230, it is not accurate enough any more for microbial community assessed by non-PCR-based methods such as microarray. This study provides some useful hints on how to choose effective DNA extraction method for the subsequent assessment of microbial community.     

Establishment of a semi-automated pathogen DNA isolation from whole blood and comparison with commercially available kits

Molecular methods for bacterial pathogen identification are gaining increased importance in routine clinical diagnostic laboratories. Achieving reliable results using DNA based technologies is strongly dependent on pre-analytical processes including isolation of target cells and their DNA of high quality and purity. In this study a fast and semi-automated method was established for bacterial DNA isolation from whole blood samples and compared to different commercially available kits: Looxster, MolYsis kit, SeptiFast DNA isolation method and standard EasyMAG protocol. The newly established, semi-automated method utilises the EasyMAG device combined with pre-processing steps comprising human cell lysis, centrifugation and bacterial pellet resuspension. Quality of DNA was assessed by a universal PCR targeting the 16S rRNA gene and subsequent microarray hybridisation. The DNA extractions were amplified using two different PCR-mastermixes, to allow comparison of a commercial mastermix with a guaranteed bacterial DNA free PCR mastermix. The modified semi-automated EasyMAG protocol and the Looxster kit gave the most sensitive results. After hybridisation a detection limit of 10¹ to 10² bacterial cells per mL whole blood was achieved depending on the isolation method and microbial species lysed. Human DNA present in the isolated DNA suspension did not interfere with PCR and did not lead to non-specific hybridisation events.     

A Simple Silica-based Method for Metagenomic DNA Extraction from Soil and Sediments

A new method is described for extraction of metagenomic DNA from soil and sediments which is based on DNA adsorption to silica without the use of phenol, ethanol precipitation or a cesium chloride gradient. High-quality DNA was obtained, and PCR inhibition was overcome by adding bovine serum albumin and adjusting magnesium concentration. By using PCR-DGGE with Firmicutes and lactic acid bacteria-specific primers the extracted metagenomic DNA was shown to contain a mixture of bacterial genomes. This method can be used for screening bacterial diversity in soil and sediment samples.     

Extraction of DNA from soil using nanoparticles by magnetic bioseparation

Aims: To develop a simple, rapid and inexpensive soil DNA extraction protocol. Methods and Results: The protocol relies on the use of superparamagnetic silica‐magnetite nanoparticles for the isolation and purification of DNA from soil samples. DNA suitable for use in molecular biology applications was obtained from a number of soil samples. Conclusions: The DNA extracted using the tested method successfully permitted the PCR amplification of a fragment of the bacterial 16S rDNA gene. The extracted DNA could also be restriction endonuclease digested. Significance and Impact of the Study: The protocol reported here is simple and permits rapid isolation of PCR‐ready soil DNA. The method requires only small quantities of soil sample, is scalable and suitable for automation.     

Efficiency of DNA extraction methods on the evaluation of soil microeukaryotic diversity

The evaluation of microbial molecular diversity has been mainly based on the extraction of total DNA from environmental samples. The indirect extraction methods, which have been used for prokaryotes, have never been used to recover soil microeukaryotic DNA. We evaluated the efficiency of an improved indirect DNA extraction protocol developed herein and the direct lysis (the sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-based method and commercial DNA extraction kit) on estimating the molecular diversity of soil microbial eukaryotes. DNA quality and quantity as well as denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiles were determined using three soil samples from different stations. The indirect method detected the highest DGGE bands in spite of the low DNA yield. The commercial kit detected a lower number of DGGE bands than the indirect method. The SDS-based method produced the lowest DGGE bands and DNA purity but the highest yield. Using the indirect method, we further evaluated the effect of freezing and air-dried preservations on estimating the microeukaryotic diversity. In spite of the low DNA yield obtained from the air-dried preservation, no significant differences were found in either the number of DGGE bands or the DNA purity between two manners. Our results indicate that the improved indirect method could obtain a high purity of intracellular DNA and high efficiency in the estimation of molecular diversity of soil microbial eukaryotes.     

Rapid and specific identification of nitrile hydratase (NHase)-encoding genes in soil samples by polymerase chain reaction

A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol was developed for the specific detection of genes coding nitrile hydratase (NHase). Primer design was based on the highly conserved sequences found in the coding region of the alpha-subunit gene corresponding to the metal-binding site. Purified genomic DNA from bacterial strains or directly from soil can serve as the target for the PCR, thus affording a simple and rapid method for screening NHase genes. The primer pairs, NHCo1/NHCo2 and NHFe1/NHFe2 yield PCR products corresponding to a partial coding sequence of cobalt and iron NHase genes, respectively. Using the PCR method, both types of iron- and cobalt-NHase-encoding genes were detected in DNA from pure cultures and soil samples. Furthermore consensus primers allowed rapid cloning and expression of novel NHases in Escherichia coli.