前噬菌体研究进展

噬菌体是地球上最多的生物实体,一直被认为是细菌的天敌。然而随着基因组学和分子生物学等技术的快速发展,人们发现噬菌体与宿主之间存在微妙而复杂的关系。前噬菌体是指溶原性细菌内存在的整套噬菌体DNA基因组,广泛分布在细菌基因组中,对调节细菌宿主生理具有重要作用,如参与调节宿主的毒力、影响生物膜形成、赋予宿主免疫力等。有趣的是,前噬菌体可以通过“监听”细菌的群体感应来调节自身的溶原–裂解状态。近年来,一些细菌中由前噬菌体编码的抗CRISPR蛋白的发现引起了人们对前噬菌体研究的关注。因此,对前噬菌体的研究可以为改造宿主和前噬菌体提供基础理论参考。本文对前噬菌体的预测、分布、分类及功能进行了综述,以期为进一步研究噬菌体与宿主间的关系提供基础。     

一株感染铜绿假单胞菌的双链RNA噬菌体PaP6的分离和鉴定

【目的】鉴定一株新分离的铜绿假单胞菌噬菌体PaP6的生物学特性。【方法】利用铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株PA038为宿主,从西南医院污水中分离得到一株裂解性噬菌体PaP6,观察其噬斑特点;氯化铯密度梯度离心纯化噬菌体颗粒后,用透射电子显微镜观察噬菌体形态;提取PaP6基因组,通过DNA酶和RNA酶酶切,做基因组酶切图谱分析;按照感染复数(MOI)分别为10、1、0.1、0.01、0.001和0.000 1加入噬菌体和宿主菌,裂解细菌后,测定噬菌体滴度;以MOI=10的比例加入噬菌体和宿主菌,绘制一步生长曲线;用112株铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株检测PaP6宿主谱。【结果】PaP6的噬斑直径约2 mm-4 mm,圆形透明,边缘清晰;PaP6噬菌体呈多面体立体对称的头部,直径约45 nm;酶切图谱表明PaP6基因组对DNase不敏感,对RNase敏感,未酶切基因组具有3节段双链RNA(dsRNA),长度分别约为9.0、4.5、3.5 kb,共约17 kb;当MOI为0.1时PaP6感染其宿主菌产生的子代噬菌体滴度最高,达到3.4×109 PFU/m L;用一步生长曲线描绘了其生长特性;PaP6可以感染40.1%的临床分离株,是一株比较广谱的噬菌体。【结论】首次报道了一株铜绿假单胞菌的ds RNA分节段噬菌体,分类学上属于囊病毒科,该噬菌体具有较广的宿主谱,在噬菌体治疗领域具有应用前景。     

细菌CRISPR-Cas 系统功能及其与噬菌体相互作用

摘要:近来研究发现,细菌CRISPR-Cas 系统在宿主菌抵抗可移动基因元件(mobile genetic elements,MGEs)的过程中发挥重要作用。CRISPR-Cas还参与宿主菌群体行为和毒力基因调控、DNA修复和基因组进化过程。本文着重综述细菌CRISPR-Cas系统的结构、类型、作用机制及其适应性免疫之外的其他功能(如对内源性基因表达的调控、促进基因组进化、DNA修复等);概述噬菌体抵抗CRISPR-Cas系统的机制,并对噬菌体-宿主菌相互作用进行探讨和展望。     

驯化噬菌体提高噬菌体对碳青霉烯类耐药肺炎克雷伯菌的杀菌能力

【目的】本研究旨在通过驯化提高噬菌体的裂解能力并降低其宿主菌耐受性产生的速度,从而提高对重要病原菌-碳青霉烯类耐药肺炎克雷伯菌(carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, CRKp)的杀菌效果。【方法】以临床CRKp菌株Kp2092为宿主菌,利用双层琼脂平板法从污水中分离噬菌体并分析其裂解谱;对其中的广谱强裂解性噬菌体通过透射电镜观察其形态特征并进行全基因组测序;通过噬菌体-宿主连续培养进行噬菌体驯化,并比较驯化前后噬菌体生物学特性的差异。【结果】分离得到的9株肺炎克雷伯菌噬菌体中,噬菌体P55anc裂解能力强且裂解谱广,透射电镜观察发现其为短尾噬菌体。P55anc基因组全长40 301 bp,包含51个编码序列,其中27个具有已知功能,主要涉及核酸代谢、噬菌体结构蛋白、DNA包装和细胞裂解等。噬菌体P55anc经9 d的驯化后,得到3株驯化噬菌体。驯化后噬菌体杀菌能力增强,主要表现为细菌生长曲线显著下降、噬菌体暴发量增多、裂解谱扩大,且宿主菌对其产生抗性的概率显著降低。与此同时,驯化后的噬菌体在热处理、紫外暴露以及血清等环境下保持较好的稳定性。【结论】利用噬菌体-宿主连续培养的方法可对噬菌体进行驯化和筛选,驯化后的噬菌体杀菌效果更强,且在不同压力处理下的稳定性良好,而细菌产生噬菌体抗性的概率也降低。     

裂解或溶源-细菌遭遇噬菌体后的命运抉择

噬菌体是地球上数量最丰富的有机体,其在自然生态系统的塑造和细菌进化驱动中发挥着至关重要的作用。在与宿主的相互斗争中,噬菌体可以选择以下2种方式决定其与宿主的命运：（1）裂解：通过裂解宿主细胞最终大量释放噬菌体颗粒;（2）溶原：将其染色体整合到宿主细胞基因组中,与宿主建立一种潜在的互存关系。对于一些温和的噬菌体,这种倾向进一步受到感染多样性的调节,其中单一感染主要是裂解性的,而多重感染则多是溶原性的。溶原性的噬菌体不仅可以根据外界环境的理化因子,还可以通过细菌自身的群体感应系统来启动裂解-溶原开关,进而决定其宿主菌的命运。与此同时,宿主细菌在与噬菌体长时间的斗争中也进化出了针对噬菌体的手段。总而言之,噬菌体深刻影响着细菌的群落动态、基因组进化和生态系统等,而这一切都取决于噬菌体与宿主间的斗争模式（裂解/溶原性感染）。本文探讨了导致温和噬菌体对宿主菌进行裂解-溶原命运抉择的影响因素并系统性总结了细菌在面对噬菌体侵染时的应对策略的最新研究进展,以期能为噬菌体与宿主的研究提供建议和帮助。     

分枝杆菌噬菌体整合及裂解的分子机理

结核病仍旧威胁着全球人类健康,中国是结核病高发国家之一,寻求新的药物和疫苗势在必行。随着对噬菌体研究的深入,分枝杆菌噬菌体成为结核病新型药物发现和药敏实验的研究热点之一。噬菌体进入宿主菌体内,以裂解和溶源两种途径进入循环。以分枝杆菌的溶源性噬菌体为例,综述了分枝杆菌噬菌体整合和裂解分子机理。分枝杆菌溶源性噬菌体的整合需噬菌体基因组的附着位点attachment site(attP),宿主菌分枝杆菌基因组的附着位点attachment site(attB),整合酶integrase(Int)和整合宿主因子integration host factor(mIHF)。部分溶源性噬菌体如Ms6进入裂解循环,复制转录组装成新的子代噬菌体,在裂解素(Lysin)和穿孔素(Holin)的协同作用下裂解宿主菌,释放子代噬菌体。目前国内未见对分枝杆菌噬菌体的研究报道。研究分枝杆菌噬菌体整合及裂解机理对结核病治疗新药开发有一定的启示。     

宿主菌抗噬菌体机制的研究进展

噬菌体又称细菌病毒,是公认最丰富的微生物,也是最多样性的,这种多样性是适应所面对选择性压力例如普遍存在宿主菌的噬菌体抗性机制。噬菌体通过6步(吸附、注入、复制、转录翻译、组装和释放)侵入细菌并使之裂解,但是当噬菌体感染细菌,就会面临细菌抗噬菌体的机制,宿主菌能够进化出多种抗噬菌体的机制来避免噬菌体的侵染和裂解。本文就对宿主菌抗噬菌体各种机制作一综述。     

细菌的噬菌体感染抗性机制

噬菌体广泛存在于生态环境中。细菌在与噬菌体长期的共进化过程中,衍化出了多种针对噬茵体感染的抗性机制。我们从宿主菌的抑制吸附、阻止噬菌体DNA注入、切断噬菌体DNA和影响其功能及流产感染等方面,对宿主菌抵抗噬菌体感染的机制进行了综述。     

基于智能计算噬菌体的细菌宿主范围预测

针对噬菌体的细菌宿主范围预测对于深入理解噬菌体及将其作为抗生素替代用于生物疗法具有重要意义。传统生物实验方法确定噬菌体的细菌宿主范围受到极有限的噬菌体可培养性和严苛的培养条件限制,而高通量测序技术所提供的海量基因组或宏基因组序列提供了噬菌体及细菌重要的序列信息,因此智能计算为预测噬菌体的细菌宿主范围提供了可行方法。本文从智能计算的角度对噬菌体的细菌宿主范围预测研究进行系统梳理,从噬菌体感染细菌的过程入手,描述配对预测模型所依赖的特征及其生物合理性,归纳宿主范围预测的智能模型、建模原理及预测策略,总结建模训练和评估所依赖的参考数据集与真实数据及评价指标。本文特别注意挖掘和分析各信息手段、模型、方法其背后的生物合理性及其依赖的生物机理。本综述期望推动基于智能算法的噬菌体的细菌宿主范围预测研究发展,并探索将生物先验结合人工智能实现噬菌体侵袭细菌宿主的本质机理推断,同时也为基于噬菌体的临床应用提供参考与借鉴。     

一株肺炎克雷伯菌噬菌体的生物学特性及全基因组分析

【背景】随着抗生素的广泛使用甚至滥用,细菌耐药性问题日益显著,利用噬菌体治疗耐药致病菌的方法重新开始被人们关注。【目的】对一株烈性肺炎克雷伯菌噬菌体vB_KpnP_IME279进行生物学特性研究及生物信息学分析。【方法】以一株多重耐药的肺炎克雷伯菌为宿主菌,从医院污水中分离噬菌体,应用双层平板法检测噬菌体效价、最佳感染复数(Optimal MOI)、一步生长曲线以及裂解谱,纯化后通过透射电镜观察噬菌体形态;应用蛋白酶K/SDS法提取噬菌体全基因组,使用Illumina MiSeq测序平台进行噬菌体全基因组测序,测序后对噬菌体全基因组序列进行组装、注释、进化和比较基因组学分析。【结果】分离到一株新的肺炎克雷伯菌噬菌体,命名为vB_KpnP_IME279;其最佳感染复数为0.1,一步生长曲线显示潜伏期为20 min,平均裂解量140 PFU/cell,电镜观察显示该噬菌体属于短尾噬菌体科(Podoviridae)。基因组测序表明,噬菌体基因组全长为42 518 bp,(G+C)mol%含量为59.3%。BLASTn比对结果表明,该噬菌体与目前已知噬菌体的相似性较低,基因组仅70%区域与已知噬菌体有同源性。构建噬菌体主要衣壳蛋白的基因进化树,分析了噬菌体IME279与其他短尾科噬菌体的进化关系,结果表明该噬菌体是短尾科噬菌体的一名新成员。【结论】分离鉴定了一株新的肺炎克雷伯菌噬菌体,进行了生物学特性、全基因组测序和生物信息学分析,为研究肺炎克雷伯菌噬菌体与宿主之间的相互作用关系以及治疗多重耐药细菌感染奠定了基础。     

Prophages and bacterial genomics: what have we learned so far?

Bacterial genome nucleotide sequences are being completed at a rapid and increasing rate. Integrated virus genomes (prophages) are common in such genomes. Fifty-one of the 82 such genomes published to date carry prophages, and these contain 230 recognizable putative prophages. Prophages can constitute as much as 10-20% of a bacterium's genome and are major contributors to differences between individuals within species. Many of these prophages appear to be defective and are in a state of mutational decay. Prophages, including defective ones, can contribute important biological properties to their bacterial hosts. Therefore, if we are to comprehend bacterial genomes fully, it is essential that we are able to recognize accurately and understand their prophages from nucleotide sequence analysis. Analysis of the evolution of prophages can shed light on the evolution of both bacteriophages and their hosts. Comparison of the Rac prophages in the sequenced genomes of three Escherichia coli strains and the Pnm prophages in two Neisseria meningitidis strains suggests that some prophages can lie in residence for very long times, perhaps millions of years, and that recombination events have occurred between related prophages that reside at different locations in a bacterium's genome. In addition, many genes in defective prophages remain functional, so a significant portion of the temperate bacteriophage gene pool resides in prophages.     

Comparative genomics groups phages of Negativicutes and classical Firmicutes despite different Gram-staining properties

Negativicutes are gram-negative bacteria characterized by two cell membranes, but they are phylogenetically a side-branch of gram-positive Firmicutes that contain only a single membrane. We asked whether viruses (phages) infecting Negativicutes were horizontally acquired from gram-negative Proteobacteria, given the shared outer cell structure of their bacterial hosts, or if Negativicute phages co-evolved vertically with their hosts and thus resemble gram-positive Firmicute prophages. We predicted and characterized 485 prophages (mostly Caudovirales) from gram-negative Firmicute genomes plus 2977 prophages from other bacterial clades, and we used virome sequence data from 183 human stool samples to support our predictions. The majority of identified Negativicute prophages were lambdoids closer related to prophages from other Firmicutes than Proteobacteria by sequence relationship and genome organization (position of the lysis module). Only a single Mu-like candidate prophage and no clear P2-like prophages were identified in Negativicutes, both common in Proteobacteria. Given this collective evidence, it is unlikely that Negativicute phages were acquired from Proteobacteria. Sequence-related prophages, which occasionally harboured antibiotic resistance genes, were identified in two distinct Negativicute orders (Veillonellales and Acidaminococcales), possibly suggesting horizontal cross-order phage infection between human gut commensals. Our results reveal ancient genomic signatures of phage and bacteria co-evolution despite horizontal phage mobilization.     

Characterization of the ELPhiS prophage from Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis strain LK5

Phages are a primary driving force behind the evolution of bacterial pathogens by transferring a variety of virulence genes into their hosts. Similar to other bacterial genomes, the Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis LK5 genome contains several regions that are homologous to phages. Although genomic analysis demonstrated the presence of prophages, it was unable to confirm which phage elements within the genome were viable. Genetic markers were used to tag one of the prophages in the genome to allow monitoring of phage induction. Commonly used laboratory strains of Salmonella were resistant to phage infection, and therefore a rapid screen was developed to identify susceptible hosts. This approach showed that a genetically tagged prophage, ELPhiS (Enteritidis lysogenic phage S), was capable of infecting Salmonella serovars that are diverse in host range and virulence and has the potential to laterally transfer genes between these serovars via lysogenic conversion. The rapid screen approach is adaptable to any system with a large collection of isolates and may be used to test the viability of prophages found by sequencing the genomes of various bacterial pathogens.     

Sequencing of CJIE1 prophages from Campylobacter jejuni isolates reveals the presence of inserted and (or) deleted genes

Bacteriophages capable of integrating into host bacterial genomes as prophages affect the biology and virulence of their bacterial hosts. Previously, partial sequencing of 12 prophages similar to CJIE1 from Campylobacter jejuni RM1221 did not show the presence of inserted nonphage genes. Therefore, four of these prophages were sequenced completely, and indels were found in at least two different regions of the prophage genome. Putative proteins from one indel appeared to be members of two new families of proteins, with proteins within each family related to each other by a common domain. Further heterogeneity was found adjacent to the CJE0270 homolog, creating difficulty locating the end of the prophage on this side and in determining the composition of the core prophage. These prophages appear to comprise a family that has heterogeneity in gene content resulting from insertion or deletion of additional genes at three locations in their genomes. In addition, members of the CJIE1 phage family may differ somewhat in their biology from phage Mu. Further investigations of these Campylobacter prophages can be expected to provide interesting insights into the biology of the phages themselves and into the role of these phages in the biology of their hosts.     

Marine phage genomics

Marine phages are the most abundant biological entities in the oceans. They play important roles in carbon cycling through marine food webs, gene transfer by transduction and conversion of hosts by lysogeny. The handful of marine phage genomes that have been sequenced to date, along with prophages in marine bacterial genomes, and partial sequencing of uncultivated phages are yielding glimpses of the tremendous diversity and physiological potential of the marine phage community. Common gene modules in diverse phages are providing the information necessary to make evolutionary comparisons. Finally, deciphering phage genomes is providing clues about the adaptive response of phages and their hosts to environmental cues.     

Phages and the evolution of bacterial pathogens: from genomic rearrangements to lysogenic conversion.

Comparative genomics demonstrated that the chromosomes from bacteria and their viruses (bacteriophages) are coevolving. This process is most evident for bacterial pathogens where the majority contain prophages or phage remnants integrated into the bacterial DNA. Many prophages from bacterial pathogens encode virulence factors. Two situations can be distinguished: Vibrio cholerae, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, and Clostridium botulinum depend on a specific prophage-encoded toxin for causing a specific disease, whereas Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium harbor a multitude of prophages and each phage-encoded virulence or fitness factor makes an incremental contribution to the fitness of the lysogen. These prophages behave like "swarms" of related prophages. Prophage diversification seems to be fueled by the frequent transfer of phage material by recombination with superinfecting phages, resident prophages, or occasional acquisition of other mobile DNA elements or bacterial chromosomal genes. Prophages also contribute to the diversification of the bacterial genome architecture. In many cases, they actually represent a large fraction of the strain-specific DNA sequences. In addition, they can serve as anchoring points for genome inversions. The current review presents the available genomics and biological data on prophages from bacterial pathogens in an evolutionary framework.     

Phages and the Evolution of Bacterial Pathogens: from Genomic Rearrangements to Lysogenic Conversion

Comparative genomics demonstrated that the chromosomes from bacteria and their viruses (bacteriophages) are coevolving. This process is most evident for bacterial pathogens where the majority contain prophages or phage remnants integrated into the bacterial DNA. Many prophages from bacterial pathogens encode virulence factors. Two situations can be distinguished: Vibrio cholerae, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, and Clostridium botulinum depend on a specific prophage-encoded toxin for causing a specific disease, whereas Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium harbor a multitude of prophages and each phage-encoded virulence or fitness factor makes an incremental contribution to the fitness of the lysogen. These prophages behave like “swarms” of related prophages. Prophage diversification seems to be fueled by the frequent transfer of phage material by recombination with superinfecting phages, resident prophages, or occasional acquisition of other mobile DNA elements or bacterial chromosomal genes. Prophages also contribute to the diversification of the bacterial genome architecture. In many cases, they actually represent a large fraction of the strain-specific DNA sequences. In addition, they can serve as anchoring points for genome inversions. The current review presents the available genomics and biological data on prophages from bacterial pathogens in an evolutionary framework.     

When a virus is not a parasite: the beneficial effects of prophages on bacterial fitness

Most organisms on the planet have viruses that infect them. Viral infection may lead to cell death, or to a symbiotic relationship where the genomes of both virus and host replicate together. In the symbiotic state, both virus and cell potentially experience increased fitness as a result of the other. The viruses that infect bacteria, called bacteriophages (or phages), well exemplify the symbiotic relationships that can develop between viruses and their host. In this review, we will discuss the many ways that prophages, which are phage genomes integrated into the genomes of their hosts, influence bacterial behavior and virulence.