染色质免疫沉淀技术分析肺腺癌A549细胞中p53蛋白与p21^CIPI和Bim基因转录启动子的结合

为了检测肺腺癌A549细胞内抑癌蛋白p53与CDK抑制蛋白p21^CIPI和Bim基因转录调控区的结合情况,采用染色质免疫沉淀技术,用p53特异性抗体沉淀DNA,PCR检测p21^CIPI和Bim基因5’端特异性序列。结果表明,在抗体免疫沉淀的DNA片段中扩增出p21^CIPI和Bim基因5’端的特异性序列。因此证实在A549细胞内,p53蛋白可与p21^CIPI和Bim基因转录启动子的特异区域结合,进而参与两基因的表达调控。     

p21WAF1／CIP1基因上游主要转录调控序列区及其相关功能

p21蛋白作为周期依赖性蛋白激酶抑制因子,调节细胞周期的进程,参与细胞生长、增殖、分化、衰老等多种活动,p21/WAF1/CIP1基因上游启动子中含有多个转录调控序列,包括p53,Sp1,Ap2,VDR及RAR,STAT,C/EBPα,β,E2A,MyoD和E2F等转录因子的顺式结合元件,在细胞的生长、分化、凋亡,衰老及疾病的发生发展中,这些转录因子通过与p21上游相应调控区相互作用,调节p21基因的表达。     

染色质免疫沉淀技术分析HePG2细胞TCF7L2蛋白与IDE基因转录启动子的结合

TCF7L2是一种重要的转录因子,通过Wnt信号途径,调节葡萄糖代谢.胰岛素降解酶(IDE)是细胞水平催化胰岛素降解的最关键的酶,与2型糖尿病(T2DM)高血糖、胰岛素抵抗、高胰岛素血症密切相关.为了检测HePG2细胞内转录因子TCF7L2与IDE基因启动子区的结合情况,采用染色质免疫沉淀技术结合PCR技术检测IDE基因启动子序列.结果表明,在特异性TCF7L2抗体免疫沉淀的DNA片段中扩增出IDE基因启动子序列,因此证实在HePG2细胞内,TCF7L2蛋白可与IDE基因转录启动子的特异区域结合,进而可能参与IDE基因的表达调控.     

DNA损伤生物学反应中ATM对p21~(WAF1/CIP1)蛋白的直接磷酸化

毛细血管扩张性共济失调症突变蛋白 (mutatedinataxiatelangiectasia ,ATM)是直接感受DNA双链断裂损伤并起始诸多DNA损伤信号反应通路的主开关分子 .已有研究发现 ,DNA损伤生物学反应中 ,ATM可通过磷酸化活化p5 3,继而转录活化细胞周期检查点蛋白p2 1WAF1 CIP1的表达 ,而对于ATM是否直接参与p2 1WAF1 CIP1的早期活化迄今尚无实验证明 .通过免疫共沉淀反应 ,检测到细胞电离辐射 (ionizingradiation ,IR)反应早期ATM与p2 1WAF1 CIP1蛋白存在相互作用 .将p2 1WAF1 CIP1蛋白编码基因全长克隆入原核表达载体pGEX4T 2 ,经诱导表达及亲和层析纯化获取GST p2 1融合蛋白作为磷酸化底物 .体外磷酸化实验检测证明 ,IR活化的ATM具磷酸化p2 1WAF1 CIP1蛋白的功能 ,并且此磷酸化功能可被PI3K家族特异性抑制剂Wortmannin所抑制 .结果揭示了IR后ATM可通过直接磷酸化p2 1WAF1 CIP1蛋白 ,在IR致DNA损伤生物学反应早期调控p2 1WAF1 CIP1蛋白的快速活化过程     

肿瘤抑制蛋白p53的活性调控

p53 又称为分子警察或基因的保护神.在面对不同类型和强度的应激时,细胞究竟选择细胞周期停滞、凋亡还是衰老时 p53发挥中心调节作用.作为一种转录调控因子它主要通过对下游的目的基因进行转录调控来发挥功能.p53 结合 DNA 启动子能力也可通过多种方式被调节.这些调节机制主要包括 p53 的亚细胞定位调控、p53 的蛋白稳定性调控和 p53 的翻译后修饰.     

p53过表达抑制同源盒基因NKX3.1启动子活性

NKX3.1是前列腺特异表达的同源盒基因,在前列腺癌的发生发展中起重要作用,而在前列腺癌进展中常会发生p53的基因突变.为研究两者之间的关系,构建NKX-3.1启动子(1 040bp)-荧光素酶报告基因重组质粒（pGL3-1040）及其缺失突变体,瞬时转染前列腺癌细胞LNCaP.通过荧光素酶表达活性分析,检测p53过表达对NKX3.1启动子活性的影响.结果表明：p53在LNCaP细胞中过表达可明显抑制NKX3.1启动子活性;RT-PCR及Western印迹检测p53过表达对NKX3.1表达的影响.结果表明,p53过表达可以明显抑制同源盒基因NKX3.1的表达.通过TRANSFAC软件分析,在NKX3.1基因上游-526至-507区存在一个p53反应元件的5′核心序列.缺失pGL3-1040中的p53反应元件核心序列并不能消除p53对NKX3.1启动子的抑制作用,表明p53不是通过p53反应元件直接抑制NKX3.1启动子活性.进一步通过5′缺失突变分析,发现NKX3.1启动子-140～+8 bp区仍受p53负调控.此148 bp区域中含有一个Sp1和一个CREB元件,瞬时共转染Sp1表达载体或CREB表达载体的结果表明,p53并不是通过与Sp1或CREB相互作用对NKX3.1启动子发挥抑制作用的.上述结果表明,p53过表达可以抑制同源盒基因NKX3.1启动子活性,下调NKX3.1基因的转录,其调控机制有待进一步研究.     

p53基因与DNA修复

DNA的损伤修复是一个多因子参与的、多环节的复杂修复系统。p53基因以多条信号通路,多种调控方式参与DNA修复。它可以通过其下游一系列靶基因p21、gadd45等调控细胞周期,使细胞停滞于G1期、G2期等检测点,从而使受损DNA有足够的时间进行多因子参与的修复过程;也可以与DNA修复因子PRSA、PCNA、XPp48基因等相互作用,直接参与DNA修复;还可以蛋白－蛋白相互作用参与DNA修复。     

鸡马立克病病毒Meq蛋白抑制p53的转录激活作用

目的　构建马立克病病毒野生型Meq基因（Meq-wt）和p53结合区域缺失的突变型Meq基因（Meq-mut）表达质粒,研究Meq蛋白对p53的转录激活功能的影响,为进一步了解其生物学功能奠定基础。方法 采用PCR方法克隆马立克氏病毒Meq-wt基因,并采用突变PCR方法缺失Meq与p53结合区域,分别构建了Meq-wt和Meq-mut基因表达质粒。转染鸡胚成纤维细胞（CEF）后,用western印迹法检测Meq蛋白的表达,利用荧光素酶报告基因系统证实Meq蛋白对p53转录激活的抑制作用。同时借助免疫荧光技术,采用荧光显微镜观察Meq蛋白与p53蛋白在细胞中的定位。结果 DNA序列测序表明克隆的Meq-wt、Meq-mut基因插入位点和核苷酸序列完全正确。荧光素酶报告基因系统证实Meq蛋白对p53转录激活的具有明显的抑制作用。间接免疫荧光试验证实野生型Meq蛋白主要在胞浆中表达,而缺失与p53结合区域的突变型Meq在胞浆/胞核中均有表达。野生型Meq蛋白与内源性p53蛋白在胞核内能够很好地重合。 结论 Meq蛋白对p53的转录激活具有抑制作用,可能是通过直接与p53相互结合,来抑制对p53转录活性功能。     

p53家族新成员：p51

p53是一种广谱的肿瘤抑制基因,其新家族成员p51具有同p53相似的DNA结合特笥和相似的功能,同样可以转录激活p53基因的内源性靶分子,如细胞周期抑制基因p21、导致细胞凋亡和生长受抑。本文阐述了它的研究进展。     

p53对restin基因转录表达的调控作用

restin基因是Zhu等人从全反式维甲酸(all-trans retinoic acid, ATRA)诱导肿瘤细胞分化时克隆得到的一种黑色素瘤抗原相关基因. 前期研究表明, 该基因与细胞周期阻滞有关. 由于p53在细胞增殖调控中占据重要地位, 并且与维甲酸具有诱导关系, 因此本研究试图揭示维甲酸诱导restin基因表达是否与p53有关. 将p53转染真核细胞, 研究restin与p53的表达关系. 结果表明p53能诱导restin基因转录增加. 进一步分析发现, restin基因5¢端上游约2 kb基因组序列中存在p53蛋白结合位点. 扩增该序列构建荧光报告系统, 检测到该报告系统可以接受维甲酸的诱导调控. 在此基础上, 研究p53对缺失p53结合位点的截短体报告质粒和p53结合位点突变后的报告质粒的作用, 结果显示p53调控restin基因的表达与该基因上游序列区中的p53结合位点无关, 推测p53对restin基因的表达调控可能还存在其他分子的相互作用.     

From p63 to p53 across p73

Most genes are members of a family. It is generally believed that a gene family derives from an ancestral gene by duplication and divergence. The tumor suppressor p53 was a striking exception to this established rule. However, two new p53 homologs, p63 and p73, have recently been described [1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6]. At the sequence level, p63 and p73 are more similar to each other than each is to p53, suggesting the possibility that the ancestral gene is a gene resembling p63/p73, while p53 is phylogenetically younger [1 and 2].

The complexity of the family has also been enriched by the alternatively spliced forms of p63 and p73, which give rise to a complex network of proteins involved in the control of cell proliferation, apoptosis and development [1, 2, 4, 7, 8 and 9].

In this review we will mainly focus on similarities and differences as well as relationships among p63, p73 and p53.     

Erp1p and Erp2p, Partners for Emp24p and Erv25p in a Yeast p24 Complex

Six new members of the yeast p24 family have been identified and characterized. These six genes, named ERP1-ERP6 (for Emp24p- and Erv25p-related proteins) are not essential, but deletion of ERP1 or ERP2 causes defects in the transport of Gas1p, in the retention of BiP, and deletion of ERP1 results in the suppression of a temperature-sensitive mutation in SEC13 encoding a COPII vesicle coat protein. These phenotypes are similar to those caused by deletion of EMP24 or ERV25, two previously identified genes that encode related p24 proteins. Genetic and biochemical studies demonstrate that Erp1p and Erp2p function in a heteromeric complex with Emp24p and Erv25p.     

Viral Oncoproteins Discriminate between p53 and the p53 Homolog p73

p73 is a recently identified member of the p53 family. Previously it was shown that p73 can, when overproduced in p53-defective tumor cells, activate p53-responsive promoters and induce apoptosis. In this report we describe the generation of anti-p73 monoclonal antibodies and confirm that two previously described p73 isoforms are produced in mammalian cells. Furthermore, we show that these two isoforms can bind to canonical p53 DNA-binding sites in electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Despite the high degree of similarity between p53 and p73, we found that adenovirus E1B 55K, simian virus 40 T, and human papillomavirus E6 do not physically interact with p73. The observation that viral oncoproteins discriminate between p53 and p73 suggests that the functions of these two proteins may differ under physiological conditions. Furthermore, they suggest that inactivation of p73 may not be required for transformation.     

Baculovirus p33 Binds Human p53 and Enhances p53-Mediated Apoptosis

In vertebrates, p53 participates in numerous biological processes including cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, differentiation, and oncogenic transformation. When insect SF-21 cells were infected with a recombinant of the baculovirus Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus (AcMNPV) overexpressing human p53, p53 formed a stable complex with the product of the AcMNPV orf92, a novel protein p33. The interaction between p53 and p33 was further confirmed by immunoprecipitation studies. When individually expressed in SF-21 cells, human p53 localized mainly in the nucleus whereas baculovirus p33 displayed diffuse cytoplasmic staining and punctuate nuclear staining. However, coexpression of p33 with p53 resulted in exclusive nuclear localization of p33. In both SF-21 and TN-368 cells, p53 expression induced typical features of apoptosis including nuclear condensation and fragmentation, oligonucleosomal ladder formation, cell surface blebbing, and apoptotic body formation. Coexpression of p53 with a baculovirus inhibitor of apoptosis, p35, OpIAP, or CpIAP, blocked apoptosis, whereas coexpression with p33 enhanced p53-mediated apoptosis approximately twofold. Expression of p53 in SF-21 cells stably expressing OpIAP inhibited cell growth in the presence or absence of p33. Thus, human p53 can influence both insect cell growth and death and baculovirus p33 can modulate the death-inducing effects of p53.     

p53 Family members p63 and p73 are SAM domain-containing proteins.

Homologs of the tumor suppressor p53, called p63 and p73, have been identified. The p63 and p73 family members possess a domain structure similar to p53, but contain variable C-terminal extensions. We find that some of the C-terminal extensions contain Sterile Alpha Motif (SAM) domains. SAM domains are protein modules that are involved in protein-protein interactions. Consistent with this role, the C-terminal SAM domains of the p63 and p73 may regulate function by recruiting other protein effectors.