利用转基因小鼠筛选全人源炭疽致死因子中和抗体

炭疽是由炭疽芽孢杆菌引起的严重威胁人类健康的传染病。炭疽毒素包括3种蛋白质成分:保护性抗原(PA)、致死因子(LF)和水肿因子(EF)。PA与LF形成致死毒素(LT),与EF形成水肿毒素(ET)。由于致死毒素(LT)在感染者损伤及死亡中发挥主要作用,因此在炭疽感染晚期单纯使用抗生素治疗难以发挥疗效,治疗性中和抗体成为目前最有效的炭疽治疗药物。目前国外获得的炭疽毒素抗体多为炭疽PA抗体,美国FDA已批准瑞西巴库(人源PA单抗)用于吸入性炭疽的治疗。一旦炭疽芽孢杆菌被人为改构或PA中和表位发生突变,针对PA单一表位的抗体将可能失效,因此针对LF的抗体将成为炭疽治疗的有效补充。目前国外已有的LF抗体多为鼠源抗体和嵌合抗体,而全人源抗体可以避免鼠源抗体免疫原性高等缺点。本研究首先用LF抗原免疫人抗体转基因小鼠,利用流式细胞仪从小鼠脾淋巴细胞中分选抗原特异的记忆B细胞,通过单细胞PCR方法快速获得两株具有结合活性的抗LF单抗1D7和2B9。瞬时转染Expi 293F细胞制备抗体,通过毒素中和实验(TNA)发现1D7和2B9在细胞模型中均显示较好的中和活性,并且与PA单抗联合使用时,表现出较好的协同作用。总之,本文利用转基因小鼠、流式分选技术和单细胞PCR技术的优势,快速筛选到全人源LF抗体,为快速筛选全人源单克隆抗体开辟了新的思路与方法。     

PA domain4-Fc融合蛋白抗血清可以保护小鼠巨噬细胞免受炭疽毒素损害

目的:探讨炭疽杆菌保护性抗原PA(protective antigen)domain4能否作为炭疽疫苗和炭疽感染时紧急预防用药.方法:构建含有PA domain4和人IgG Fc片段的表达载体,通过免疫大耳白兔获得针对该融合蛋白的免疫血清,通过小鼠巨噬细胞保护试验验证PA domain4-Fc是否具有疫苗和紧急预防用功能.结果:获得了表达PA domain4-Fc融合蛋白的CHO细胞株和针对PA domain4-Fc的兔抗血清,细胞保护试验证实PA domain4-Fc抗血清能够保护小鼠巨噬细胞免受炭疽毒素的攻击,但PA domain4-Fc蛋白本身并不能直接拮抗炭疽毒素对细胞的损害.结论:PA domain4-Fc抗血清可以保护小鼠巨噬细胞免受炭疽毒素损害,表明PA domain4-Fe具有作为炭疽疫苗的可能,但PA domain4-Fc蛋白不能直接竞争性拮抗炭疽毒素损害细胞.     

炭疽毒素保护性抗原第四结构域在大肠杆菌中的可溶性表达

人工优化设计并合成炭疽毒素保护性抗原第四结构域基因,并与噬菌体gⅢ蛋白N端结构域基因融合,在大肠杆菌中可溶性表达融合蛋白。结果表明合成了炭疽毒素保护性抗原第四结构域基因,并在大肠杆菌中获得了高效可溶性融合表达,可溶性表达产物占细菌总蛋白量的36％左右;经亲和层析纯化获得了重组蛋白;Western印迹分析表明,表达产物能与His单抗（重组蛋白羧基端带有6xHis）发生特异性结合反应。以上结果表明获得了炭疽毒素保护性抗原第四结构域,为利用人抗体库进行筛选抗炭疽毒素的人源性中和抗体奠定了基础。     

戊型肝炎病毒中和性单克隆抗体的鉴定

阻断实验发现。用戊型肝炎病毒(HEV)衣壳蛋白重组抗原制备的8株抗HEV单克隆抗体(mAb),分别识别3个构象表位和2个线性表位。用抗体捕获反转录PCR方法证实,其中识别2个构象表位的3个mAb可以直接捕获HEV颗粒,表明这2个表位位于HEV颗粒的外表面。识别这两个表位的mAbSCll和8H3均可中和HEV对恒河猴的致病性和感染性。rnAb8C11缩短排毒时间的效应较明显,而mAb8H3延迟机体抗HEV抗体阳转时间的效应较明显。二者的中和效应具有较明显的协同作用。中和单抗8C11、8H3对戊肝不同感染时期的血清均有显著阻断作用,Fab片段的阻断作用与完整抗体类似,表明这两个mAb对应的中和表位是HEV体液免疫应答的优势表位。     

重组炭疽水肿因子的表达与生物活性分析

炭疽毒素包括3种蛋白因子,即保护性抗原（PA）、致死因子（LF）和水肿因子（EF）。EF是钙调蛋白依耐的腺苷酸环化酶,可使细胞cAMP浓度升高,导致宿主防御能力下降。为深入研究炭疽毒素的作用机理,构建了原核表达质粒,在大肠杆菌中表达出重组EF（rEF）。经鉴定,rEF以可溶形式表达于细菌胞质中。经过金属螯和层析、阳离子交换层析和凝胶层析,每升诱导培养物可获得约5mg 重组蛋白。用重组蛋白免疫家兔获得了兔多抗,能够在细胞试验中中和rEF,体外细胞试验显示rEF具有很好的生物活性,在J774A.1和CHO细胞试验中,能与LF共同竞争和PA的结合位点,相互抑制。上述工作为深入研究炭疽毒素的作用机理,开发针对EF的毒素抑制剂打下基础     

炭疽受体CMG2-Fc融合蛋白在CHO细胞中的表达、纯化与鉴定

目的：构建炭疽受体CMG2和人IgGl Fc片段融合基因载体,转染CHO细胞并通过毒素中和试验检测CMG2-Fc拮抗炭疽毒素（PA＋LF）的能力。方法-将含有CMG2胞外区1-217AA片度基因和人IgGl的Fc片段基因共同连接入pcDNA3．1载体转染CHO细胞并筛选高表达CMG2-Fc的CHO细胞系,通过小鼠RAW264．7巨噬细胞保护试验检测CMG2-Fc拮抗炭疽毒素的能力。结果：获得了表达CMG2-Fc的细胞株,毒素中和实验显示该蛋白可以有效抑制炭疽毒素引起的细胞损伤。结论：CMG2-Fc能够保护小鼠巨噬细胞免受炭疽毒素攻击,提示其可以作为抗毒素治疗炭疽感染。     

炭疽菌保护性抗原受体结合区的表达及其多克隆抗体的制备

原核表达炭疽杆菌保护性抗原受体结合区并制备该蛋白的多克隆抗体.从炭疽芽胞杆菌A16R中经PCR扩增得到了炭疽菌保护性抗原(PA)受体结合区基因,即PA的第四结构域(PA-D4),将其克隆至含有6×His编码序列的原核表达载体pET-2b(+)中,将重组质粒转化大肠杆菌BL21(DE3),在IPTG诱导下进行蛋白表达;用HiTrapTM Chelating HP柱纯化重组蛋白,Western blot进一步鉴定;以纯化后的蛋白为抗原,免疫新西兰大耳白兔制备该蛋白的多克隆抗体;用ELISA和Western blot检测抗血清.结果表明,目的蛋白在大肠杆菌BL21(DE3)中获得了可溶性表达,纯化后纯度可达90%以上;制备了针对PA-D4融合蛋白的高效价抗血清,ELISA抗体滴度为1∶ 102 400;其抗体能特异性识别内源性的PA.PA-D4重组蛋白及其多克隆抗体的获得,为后续研究其功能和炭疽疫苗免疫保护机制奠定了基础.     

炭疽毒素保护性抗原的不同结构域对其表达可溶性的影响

目的：对炭疽毒素保护性抗原（PA）的不同结构域进行了缺失突变,以期找到免疫原性降低而功能变化不大的PA蛋白突变体。方法：在对PA结构域的缺失突变体进行表达时,意外发现不同的突变体表达效果之间存在很大差异,遂用DNAStar软件对PA的4个结构域和突变体进行分析。结果：PA蛋白结构域2的表面特性与其他结构域存在很大差异。结论：推断这种表面特性影响了PA突变体的可溶性特征。     

CMG2-Fc 融合蛋白突变体筛选及中和炭疽毒素活性分析

目的:筛选能有效中和炭疽毒素和抵抗炭疽毒素损伤细胞的CMG2-Fc(炭疽毒素受体II-人免疫球蛋白Fc段融合蛋白)突变体。方法:运用FoldX等计算软件分析CMG2与PA晶体学结构,设计能提高CMG2-PA亲和力的突变体分子,并与人IgG1Fc片段构成融合基因,转染CHO-S细胞并通过亲和层析获得CMG2-Fc突变体蛋白,通过亲和力检测和细胞保护实验分析各突变体中和炭疽毒素能力。结果:筛选并表达了8个CMG2-Fc突变体分子,亲和力实验显示其中E117Q突变可明显提高CMG2-Fc与PA的亲和力(KD=1.35×10-11 mol/L),细胞保护实验提示E117Q突变能有效提高CMG2-Fc中和炭疽毒素能力(CMG2-Fc(E117Q)的IC50为15 ng/μL,而wt CMG2-Fc的IC50为50ng/μL)。结论:CMG2-Fc(E117Q)突变体分子可作为拮抗炭疽毒素损伤的炭疽治疗药物分子,进行进一步研究。     

炭疽受体CMG2-Fc 融合蛋白在CHO 细胞中的表达、纯化与鉴定

目的:构建炭疽受体CMG2和人IgG1 Fc片段融合基因载体,转染CHO细胞并通过毒素中和试验检测CMG2-Fc拮抗炭疽毒素(PA+LF)的能力。方法:将含有CMG2胞外区1-217AA片度基因和人IgG1的Fc片段基因共同连接入pcDNA3.1载体转染CHO细胞并筛选高表达CMG2-Fc的CHO细胞系,通过小鼠RAW264.7巨噬细胞保护试验检测CMG2-Fc拮抗炭疽毒素的能力。结果:获得了表达CMG2-Fc的细胞株,毒素中和实验显示该蛋白可以有效抑制炭疽毒素引起的细胞损伤。结论:CMG2-Fc能够保护小鼠巨噬细胞免受炭疽毒素攻击,提示其可以作为抗毒素治疗炭疽感染。     

Cross-reactivity of anthrax and C2 toxin: protective antigen promotes the uptake of botulinum C2I toxin into human endothelial cells

Binary toxins are among the most potent bacterial protein toxins performing a cooperative mode of translocation and exhibit fatal enzymatic activities in eukaryotic cells. Anthrax and C2 toxin are the most prominent examples for the AB(7/8) type of toxins. The B subunits bind both host cell receptors and the enzymatic A polypeptides to trigger their internalization and translocation into the host cell cytosol. C2 toxin is composed of an actin ADP-ribosyltransferase (C2I) and C2II binding subunits. Anthrax toxin is composed of adenylate cyclase (EF) and MAPKK protease (LF) enzymatic components associated to protective antigen (PA) binding subunit. The binding and translocation components anthrax protective antigen (PA(63)) and C2II of C2 toxin share a sequence homology of about 35%, suggesting that they might substitute for each other. Here we show by conducting in vitro measurements that PA(63) binds C2I and that C2II can bind both EF and LF. Anthrax edema factor (EF) and lethal factor (LF) have higher affinities to bind to channels formed by C2II than C2 toxin's C2I binds to anthrax protective antigen (PA(63)). Furthermore, we could demonstrate that PA in high concentration has the ability to transport the enzymatic moiety C2I into target cells, causing actin modification and cell rounding. In contrast, C2II does not show significant capacity to promote cell intoxication by EF and LF. Together, our data unveiled the remarkable flexibility of PA in promoting C2I heterologous polypeptide translocation into cells.     

炭疽毒素及其细胞受体的研究进展

炭疽毒素由 3种蛋白组成 :保护性抗原 (protectiveantigen ,PA)、致死因子 (lethalfactor,LF)和水肿因子 (edemafactor ,EF) .综述炭疽毒素研究的最新进展 .主要介绍炭疽毒素的关键致病因子———LF的结构与功能 ,炭疽毒素膜转运成分PA的结构及其受体 (anthraxtoxinreceptor ,ATR)和其cDNA克隆的结构 ,并讨论了在炭疽的治疗、预防和毒素在肿瘤治疗中的可能应用 .     

Anthrax toxin receptor drives protective antigen oligomerization and stabilizes the heptameric and octameric oligomer by a similar mechanism

Background

Anthrax toxin is comprised of protective antigen (PA), lethal factor (LF), and edema factor (EF). These proteins are individually nontoxic; however, when PA assembles with LF and EF, it produces lethal toxin and edema toxin, respectively. Assembly occurs either on cell surfaces or in plasma. In each milieu, PA assembles into a mixture of heptameric and octameric complexes that bind LF and EF. While octameric PA is the predominant form identified in plasma under physiological conditions (pH 7.4, 37°C), heptameric PA is more prevalent on cell surfaces. The difference between these two environments is that the anthrax toxin receptor (ANTXR) binds to PA on cell surfaces. It is known that the extracellular ANTXR domain serves to stabilize toxin complexes containing the PA heptamer by preventing premature PA channel formation—a process that inactivates the toxin. The role of ANTXR in PA oligomerization and in the stabilization of toxin complexes containing octameric PA are not understood.

Methodology

Using a fluorescence assembly assay, we show that the extracellular ANTXR domain drives PA oligomerization. Moreover, a dimeric ANTXR construct increases the extent of and accelerates the rate of PA assembly relative to a monomeric ANTXR construct. Mass spectrometry analysis shows that heptameric and octameric PA oligomers bind a full stoichiometric complement of ANTXR domains. Electron microscopy and circular dichroism studies reveal that the two different PA oligomers are equally stabilized by ANTXR interactions.

Conclusions

We propose that PA oligomerization is driven by dimeric ANTXR complexes on cell surfaces. Through their interaction with the ANTXR, toxin complexes containing heptameric and octameric PA oligomers are similarly stabilized. Considering both the relative instability of the PA heptamer and extracellular assembly pathway identified in plasma, we propose a means to regulate the development of toxin gradients around sites of infection during anthrax pathogenesis.     

The 2beta2-2beta3 loop of anthrax protective antigen contains a dominant neutralizing epitope

Anthrax toxin consists of three proteins, protective antigen (PA), lethal factor, and edema factor. PA is the major component in the current anthrax vaccine, but the antigenic epitopes on it are not well-defined. We generated a pool of toxin-neutralizing anti-PA monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to analyze the neutralizing epitopes of PA. Nine toxin-neutralizing MAbs obtained were found bound to three different domains of PA respectively, among which three MAbs with the strongest toxin-neutralizing activity recognized the same epitope within domain 2. This epitope was fine mapped to the chymotrypsin-sensitive site, (312)SFFD(315), in the 2beta(2)-2beta(3) loop of PA, using phage-displayed random peptide libraries and mutation analysis. The result demonstrated for the first time that the 2beta(2)-2beta(3) loop, which is involved in the transition of PA oligomers from prepore to pore, contains a dominant neutralizing epitope. This work contributes to the immunological and functional analysis of PA and offers perspective for the development of a new epitope vaccine against anthrax.     

Human antibodies from immunized donors are protective against anthrax toxin in vivo

A panel of Fabs that neutralize anthrax toxin in vitro was selected from libraries generated from human donors vaccinated against anthrax. At least two of these antibodies protect rats from anthrax intoxication in vivo. Fabs 83K7C and 63L1D bind with subnanomolar affinity to protective antigen (PA) 63, and Fab 63L1D neutralizes toxin substoichiometrically, inhibits lethal factor (LF) interaction with PA63 and binds to a conformational epitope formed by PA63.     

Membrane insertion of anthrax protective antigen and cytoplasmic delivery of lethal factor occur at different stages of the endocytic pathway

The protective antigen (PA) of anthrax toxin binds to a cell surface receptor, undergoes heptamerization, and binds the enzymatic subunits, the lethal factor (LF) and the edema factor (EF). The resulting complex is then endocytosed. Via mechanisms that depend on the vacuolar ATPase and require membrane insertion of PA, LF and EF are ultimately delivered to the cytoplasm where their targets reside. Here, we show that membrane insertion of PA already occurs in early endosomes, possibly only in the multivesicular regions, but that subsequent delivery of LF to the cytoplasm occurs preferentially later in the endocytic pathway and relies on the dynamics of internal vesicles of multivesicular late endosomes.     

Fusions of anthrax toxin lethal factor to the ADP-ribosylation domain of Pseudomonas exotoxin A are potent cytotoxins which are translocated to the cytosol of mammalian cells.

The lethal factor (LF) and edema factor (EF) components of anthrax toxin are toxic to animal cells only if internalized by interaction with the protective antigen (PA) component. PA binds to a cell surface receptor and is proteolytically cleaved to expose a binding site for LF and EF. To study how LF and EF are internalized and trafficked within cells, LF was fused to the translocation and ADP-ribosylation domains (domains II and III, respectively) of Pseudomonas exotoxin A. LF fusion proteins containing Pseudomonas exotoxin A domains II and III were less toxic than those containing only domain III. Fusion proteins with a functional endoplasmic reticulum retention sequence, REDLK, at the carboxyl terminus of domain III were less toxic than those with a nonfunctional sequence, LDER. The most potent fusion protein, FP33, had an EC50 = 2 pM on Chinese hamster ovary cells, exceeding that of native Pseudomonas exotoxin A (EC50 = 420 pM). Toxicity of all the fusion proteins required the presence of PA and was blocked by monensin. These data suggest that LF and LF fusion proteins are efficiently translocated from acidified endosomes directly to the cytosol without trafficking through other organelles, as is required for Pseudomonas exotoxin A. This system provides a potential vehicle for importing diverse proteins into the cytosol of mammalian cells.     

Participation of residue F552 in domain III of the protective antigen in the biological activity of anthrax lethal toxin

The protective antigen (PA) component of anthrax toxin translocates the catalytic moieties lethal factor (LF) and edema factor (EF) into the cytosol. The proteolytically activated 63 kDa form of PA (PA63) has the ability to oligomerize and bind LF/EF. PA has four distinct domains performing specialized functions; whereas the function of domains I, II and IV has been well characterized, domain III has no known role in the biological activity of PA. Here we report the role of amino acid residues lining an exposed hydrophobic patch of domain III in the biological activity of PA. The residues Phe552, Phe554, lIe562, Leu566 and lle574 were individually substituted with alanine and the effect was studied. All mutant PA proteins except Phe552Ala were equally active as wild-type PA in exhibiting a toxic phenotype to J774A.1 cells in the presence of LF. Substitution of Ala for Phe552 reduced the ability of PA to intoxicate cells by more than 250-fold. However, Phe552Ala was equally active in receptor binding and susceptibility to trypsin and chymotrypsin as wild-type PA, the activities that have been shown to be essential for the biological activity of PA. This mutated PA protein had a decreased ability to bind LF, oligomerize on cells and to induce release of 86Rb+ from Chinese hamster ovary cells. These results suggest that the residue Phe552 in PA plays an important role in LF binding and oligomerization. Our study provides a basis for further exploration of the biological significance of domain III of PA.     

A Novel Mechanism for Antibody-based Anthrax Toxin Neutralization: INHIBITION OF PREPORE-TO-PORE CONVERSION

Protective antigen (PA), a key component of anthrax toxin, mediates the entry of lethal factor (LF) or edema factor (EF) through a membranal pore into target cells. We have previously reported the isolation and chimerization of cAb29, an anti-PA monoclonal antibody that effectively neutralizes anthrax toxin in an unknown mechanism. The aim of this study was to elucidate the neutralizing mechanism of this antibody in vitro and to test its ability to confer post-exposure protection against anthrax in vivo. By systematic evaluation of the steps taking place during the PA-based intoxication process, we found that cAb29 did not interfere with the initial steps of intoxication, namely its ability to bind to the anthrax receptor, the consecutive proteolytic cleavage to PA₆₃, oligomerization, prepore formation, or LF binding. However, the binding of cAb29 to the prepore prevented its pH-triggered transition to the transmembranal pore, thus preventing the last step of intoxication, i.e. the translocation of LF/EF into the cell. Epitope mapping, using a phage display peptide library, revealed that cAb29 binds the 2α₁ loop in domain 2 of PA, a loop that undergoes major conformational changes during pore formation. In vivo, we found that 100% of anthrax-infected rabbits survived when treated with cAb29 12 h after exposure. In conclusion, these experiments demonstrate that cAb29 exerts its potent neutralizing activity in a unique manner by blocking the prepore-to-pore conversion process.