成熟欧李果肉中单宁提取条件的优化

以成熟欧李为试验材料,乙醇、丙酮、二甲基甲酰胺为提取剂,采用L25（5^6）正交试验设计,从溶剂浓度、固液比、浸提时间、浸提温度等因素的不同水平对欧李果肉中单宁的提取条件进行了研究,结果表明：从欧李果肉中提取单宁的最佳条件为：以丙酮作提取剂,浓度60％,浸提时间4h,浸提温度30℃,固液比1：20;以乙醇作提取剂,浓度30％,浸提时间4h,浸提温度60℃,固液比1：30。     

核桃楸叶片中总黄酮的最佳提取工艺研究

利用超声波法对核桃楸叶片中总黄酮的提取工艺进行了研究,在单因素试验的基础上,采用正交试验法,确立最佳提取条件,考察乙醇浓度、提取温度、液料比和提取时间对核桃楸叶片总黄酮提取率的影响。结果表明：超声波法辅助提取核桃楸叶片总黄酮的最适工艺参数是浸提剂乙醇浓度为70%,提取温度为50℃,液料比为20：1,提取时间为20 min,且总黄酮提取率可达4.458%。     

正交试验法研究决明子提取工艺

采用正交试验法优选出了决明子中蒽醌衍生物的最佳提取工艺条件为：50％乙醇水为浸提剂;固液比1：5,提取温度70℃,提取时间2h。总蒽醌衍生物的产率为0．83％。如果采用醋酸酸化预处理工艺,可使蒽醌衍生物(抗癌、抗菌有效部位)的产率增加0．19％。通过溶剂萃取和沉淀分离得到两大有效部位：脂溶性部位(蒽醌衍性物)和水溶性部位(蒽醌甙类)。     

银杏叶总黄酮的超声波提取法

本文通过单因素实验和正交实验,确定了超声波法提取银杏叶中黄酮类化合物的最佳提取工艺,并与常规乙醇浸提法,微波提取法作了比较研究。实验表明：超声波提取法优于常规乙醇浸提法和微波提取法。超声波法的最佳操作条件为：320W超声波功率,温度30℃,70％乙醇,在液固比15：1条件下提取10min,连续提取2次,总黄酮提取率可达94．1％。     

若羌大枣多糖提取及分离工艺研究

目的：确定大枣多糖提取分离工艺的参数。方法：采用热水浸提法取多糖,乙醇沉淀法分离多糖。对液固比、浸提时间、浸提温度进行了单因素和L9（3^3）正交实验,并对提取过程中影响提取率的因素进行了统计分析。对多糖浸提液浓缩倍数、乙醇沉淀体积、醇沉时间对大枣多糖得率的影响进行了研究。结果：最佳提取工艺条件为：提取时间6h,料水比1：24,提取温度90℃。最佳分离工艺：浓缩倍数为8倍,4倍体积乙醇,醇沉12h,大枣多糖的得率最大。结论：实验结果为新疆次级大枣的深加工提供了可参数据。     

葡萄叶中总黄酮的提取工艺研究

目的：从葡萄叶中提取总黄酮。方法：采用正交试验法研究葡萄叶总黄酮的最佳提取工艺条件,考察了乙醇浓度、回流温度、回流时间及料液比四因素对葡萄叶总黄酮提取率的影响。结果：确立了葡萄叶总黄酮最佳提取条件为：45％的乙醇为溶剂、液料比为1：40、提取温度为60％、提取时间2h,在最佳工艺条件下葡萄叶总黄酮含量为5．329mg／g。     

怀地黄多糖双酶法提取工艺研究

本文对怀地黄多糖（polysaccharide of Rehmannia glutinosa f.hueichingensis（Chan et Schih）Hsiao,简称为RGP）双酶法提取工艺（Extracting technology by dienzyme,简称DEET）的条件进行了研究和探讨。双酶提取法即在第一次浸提时分别加入纤维素酶和中性蛋白酶两种生物酶进行多糖的辅助提取。本实验选取提取温度、纤维素酶加量、提取液pH、固液比四个因素,以多糖含量作为指标,通过L9（3^4）正交实验确定此工艺的最佳工艺参数。结果表明：RGP双酶法提取的最佳工艺参数为：浸提温度65℃、浸提液pH5．5、纤维素酶加量7．5％、固液比为1：30;浸提液浓缩比为4：1、沉降剂乙醇添加量5倍于浸提液体积;脱蛋白采用浸提过程中中性蛋白酶脱蛋白法与浸提后Sevag脱蛋白法联合应用方法（简称“S＋N”法）,提取得到的RGP含量及得率可分别为60．26％和8．97％。较传统的水浸醇沉提取工艺RGP含量及得率分别提高了1．5倍和1．4倍。     

深山含笑叶片总酚超声波提取工艺的优化

采用单因素实验方法研究了超声波辅助提取过程中乙醇浓度、料液比、提取温度和提取时间对深山含笑（Michelia maudiae Dunn）叶片总酚提取率的影响,并采用正交实验方法确定了最佳提取工艺条件。结果表明,深山含笑叶片总酚超声波辅助提取的最佳提取工艺为：按1：30（质量-体积比）的料液比加入体积分数70％的乙醇,于65℃条件下用超声波辅助提取30min。采用最佳的超声波提取工艺,深山含笑叶片的总酚提取率可达到11．41％。定性分析结果显示,深山含笑叶片的总酚提取物具有典型的酚类化合物特性,并显示出鞣质类成分、黄酮类成分和香豆素类成分的定性反应特征。     

超声波法提取槐花中黄酮的最佳工艺研究

本文探讨了影响超声波法槐花中黄酮提取率的主要因素,最后用正交法确定了好的提取工艺,并与常规热回流提取法作了比较研究。结果表明：超声波法优于常规热回流提取法。超声法的最佳提取条件为：使用60％乙醇,在温度75℃料液比1：15条件下提取30min,连续提取2次,黄酮的总提取率可达99．84％。     

超声波强化提取罗布麻中总黄酮

本研究采用超声波强化提取罗布麻中总黄酮,选择乙醇浓度、超声功率、超声时间、料液比为因素进行正交实验优选出超声提取的最佳工艺条件：即60％浓度乙醇,料液比为1：15,在300W的超声波下超声提取10min,提取率达90％以上。采用超声波提取技术,具有提取效率高、提取时间短、提取温度低的优点。     

On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta

The phylogenetic relationships of the Clitellata were investigated with a data set of published and new complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of 51 species representing 41 families. Sequences were aligned on the basis of a secondary structure model and analysed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. In contrast to the latter method, parsimony did not recover the monophyly of Clitellata. However, a close scrutiny of the data suggested a spurious attraction between some polychaetes and clitellates. As a rule, molecular trees are closely aligned with morphology-based phylogenies. Acanthobdellida and Euhirudinea were reconciled in their traditional Hirudinea clade and were included in the Oligochaeta with the Branchiobdellida via the Lumbriculidae as a possible link between the two assemblages. While the 18S gene yielded a meaningful historical signal for determining relationships within clitellates, the exact position of Hirudinea and Branchiobdellida within oligochaetes remained unresolved. The lack of phylogenetic signal is interpreted as evidence for a rapid radiation of these taxa. The placement of Clitellata within the Polychaeta remained unresolved. The biological reality of polytomies within annelids is suggested and supports the hypothesis of an extremely ancient radiation of polychaetes and emergence of clitellates.     

On the ontogeny of the haptor and the evolution of the Monogenea

Data on the ontogeny of the posterior haptor of monogeneans were obtained from more than 150 publications and summarised. These data were plotted into diagrams showing evolutionary capacity levels based on the theory of a progressive evolution of marginal hooks, anchors and other attachment components of the posterior haptor in the Monogenea (Malmberg, 1986). 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks are assumed to be the most primitive monogenean haptoral condition. Thus the diagrams were founded on a 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hook evolutionary capacity level, and the evolutionary capacity levels of anchors and other haptoral attachement components were arranged according to haptoral ontogenetical sequences. In the final plotting diagram data on hosts, type of spermatozoa, oncomiracidial ciliation, sensilla pattern and protonephridial systems were also included. In this way a number of correlations were revealed. Thus, for example, the number of 5 + 5 marginal hooks correlates with the most primitive monogenean type of spermatozoon and with few sensillae, many ciliated cells and a simple protonephridial system in the oncomiracidium. On the basis of the reviewed data it is concluded that the ancient monogeneans with 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks were divided into two main lines, one retaining unhinged marginal hooks and the other evolving hinged marginal hooks. Both main lines have recent representatives at different marginal hook evolutionary capacity levels, i.e. monogeneans retaining a haptor with only marginal hooks. For the main line with hinged marginal hooks the name Articulon-choinea n. subclass is proposed. Members with 8 + 8 hinged marginal hooks only are here called Proanchorea n. superord. Monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks only are here called Ananchorea n. superord. and three new families are erected for its recent members: Anonchohapteridae n. fam., Acolpentronidae n. fam. and Anacanthoridae n. fam. (with 7 + 7, 8 + 8 and 9 + 9 unhinged marginal hooks, respectively). Except for the families of Articulonchoinea (e.g. Acanthocotylidae, Gyrodactylidae, Tetraonchoididae) Bychowsky's (1957) division of the Monogenea into the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea fits the proposed scheme, i.e. monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks form one old group, the Oligonchoinea, which have 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks, and the other group form the Polyonchoinea, which (with the exception of the Hexabothriidae) has a greater number (7 + 7, 8 + 8 or 9 + 9) of unhinged marginal hooks. It is proposed that both these names, Oligonchoinea (sensu mihi) and Polyonchoinea (sensu mihi), will be retained on one side and Articulonchoinea placed on the other side, which reflects the early monogenean evolution. Except for the members of Ananchorea [Polyonchoinea], all members of the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea have anchors, which imply that they are further evolved, i.e. have passed the 5 + 5 marginal hook evolutionary capacity level (Malmberg, 1986). There are two main types of anchors in the Monogenea: haptoral anchors, with anlages appearing in the haptor, and peduncular anchors, with anlages in the peduncle. There are two types of haptoral anchors: peripheral haptoral anchors, ontogenetically the oldest, and central haptoral anchors. Peduncular anchors, in turn, are ontogenetically younger than peripheral haptoral anchors. There may be two pairs of peduncular anchors: medial peduncular anchors, ontogentically the oldest, and lateral peduncular anchors. Only peduncular (not haptoral) anchors have anchor bars. Monogeneans with haptoral anchors are here called Mediohaptanchorea n. superord. and Laterohaptanchorea n. superord. or haptanchoreans. All oligonchoineans and the oldest polyonchoineans are haptanchoreans. Certain members of Calceostomatidae [Polyonchoinea] are the only monogeneans with both (peripheral) haptoral and peduncular anchors (one pair). These monogeneans are here called Mixanchorea n. superord. Polyonchoineans with peduncular anchors and unhinged marginal hooks are here called the Pedunculanchorea n. superord. The most primitive pedunculanchoreans have only one pair of peduncular anchors with an anchor bar, while the most advanced have both medial and lateral peduncular anchors; each pair having an anchor bar. Certain families of the Articulonchoinea, the Anchorea n. superord., also have peduncular anchors (parallel evolution): only one family, the Sundanonchidae n. fam., has both medial and lateral peduncular anchors, each anchor pair with an anchor bar. Evolutionary lines from different monogenean evolutionary capacity levels are discussed and a new system of classification for the Monogenea is proposed.In agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. EditorIn agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. Editor