RNA干涉的临床前实验研究进展

RNA干涉（RNA interference,RNAi）是一种非常保守的细胞现象,在基础研究和疾病治疗方面具有重大的应用前景。尤其引人注目的是,新的RNAi方法学与已建立的转基因策略相结合,有效地将组织特异性RNAi导入到患者体内,有望治疗人类疾病。本文综述了RNAi的机制与在其临床前的实验研究,简要介绍了RNAi的新用途,讨论了RNAi基因治疗存在的问题,展望了RNAi基因治疗的应用前景。     

RNA干扰在疾病治疗上的应用

RNA干扰(RNA interference,RNAi)是一种双链RNA分子在mRNA水平上引发的特异性基因沉默现象。RNAi在基因治疗方面表现出了光明的前景,已成功地应用于多种疾病的临床治疗。本文主要介绍了RNAi在疾病治疗上的应用及研究进展。     

RNAi在抗病毒防治领域的应用

RNAi是由双链RNA(dsRNA)所诱发的转录后水平上的基因沉默.由于对靶基因沉默作用的高度特异性和高效性,因此近年来用于肿瘤性疾病、感染性疾病、遗传性疾病等疾病的基因治疗研究,特别是在抗病毒领域的研究更是成为其应用热点之一.虽然目前RNAi已经较为广泛地应用于动物病毒及各种疾病病毒的基因治疗研究中,但其在应用过程中还有许多亟待解决的问题.本文就RNAi及其在抗病毒领域的应用研究和其存在的问题展开综述.     

RNAi技术及其在口腔医学研究中的应用

RNAi(RNA interference)技术在医学研究中的应用发展迅速,运用RNAi可用来进行特定基因功能的研究和特异性基因治疗,在包括肿瘤、遗传性疾病、发育性疾病、病毒感染等的发病、预防、治疗方面的研究有着广阔的应用前景.本文就RNAi技术及其在口腔医学领域研究中的应用现状和前景做一综述.     

RNA干扰技术及其在肝纤维化中的应用

RNA干扰(RNA interference,RNAi)是近几年发展起来的新技术,是外源和内源性双链RNA在生物体内诱导同源靶基因的mRNA特异性降解,因而抑制相应基因表达,导致转录后基因沉默的现象.尽管RNA干扰发现的时间较短,但由于其具有操作简单、成本低、特异性高和高效性等特点,因而发展迅速.小干扰RNA(small interfering RNA,siRNA)的可制备使RNAi在很多领域有了应用的前景,尤其是在复杂多变的肝脏疾病中.肝纤维化(hepatic fibrosis,HF)是多种慢性肝病发展的共同病理基础,RNAi技术在其基因治疗领域拥有广阔的前景.RNAi具有能够调节细胞增殖、抑制致病基因的表达、影响细胞的信号转导等方面的作用,可能成为肝纤维化有效的潜在治疗手段.     

RNA干扰机制及其应用研究进展

2006年诺贝尔生理学或医学奖,授予给了美国科学家Andrew Z.Fire和Craig C.Mello以表彰他们发现了RNA 干扰(RNAinterference RNAi)现象,使人们在基因治疗传染性、恶性肿瘤等危重疾病领域取得了突破性的发展.本文主要综述了RNA干扰系统的组成、分子机制、作用特点及其在探索基因功能、传染性、恶性肿瘤的基因治疗和药物研发等四个方面的应用.     

RNA干扰用于基因治疗的研究进展

RNA干扰(RNAi)是20世纪末才被人们认识和重视的一种通过双链RNA抵御病毒入侵或抑制转座子活动的生物防御机制。随着RNA干扰分子机制研究的深入及其应用研究的发展,人们发现RNA干扰技术在基因功能研究及人类疾病的基因治疗上具有广阔的应用前景。本文在简述RNAi分子机制的基础上,综述了RNAi在抗病毒治疗及抗肿瘤治疗方面的研究和应用概况。     

慢病毒载体介导RNAi的研究进展

RNAi通过双链RNA的介导,特异性阻抑相关序列的表达,从而导致转录后水平的基因沉默.广泛存在于真菌、植物和动物等真核生物中.慢病毒载体是理想的真核细胞基因转移工具,被广泛应用于相关的RNAi研究领域,例如抗病毒研究、癌症及其治疗、遗传性疾病的治疗、基因治疗.现已发现,慢病毒载体能够介导组织特异、时间特异的RNAi,在疾病的基因靶向性治疗上必有广阔的前景.     

RNAi技术的医疗应用潜力

RNA干扰是指双链RNA在细胞内特异性地诱导同源互补的mRNA降解,从而阻断相应基因表达的现象。RNAi发展成为一种新型的基因治疗方式的进程取决于哺乳动物砌RNAi的研究进展。在大多数哺乳动物细胞中,直接导入长dsRNA引发的非特异性基因沉默掩盖了RNAi效应,而多种有效的双链RNA导入方式在一定程度上解决了这一问题。初步的实验结果表明,用RNAi治疗癌症、病毒感染等疾病的设想有可能变成现实。     

RNA干涉的最新研究进展

RNA干涉 (RNAi)是将双链RNA(dsRNA)导入细胞引起特异基因mRNA降解的一种细胞反应过程 .它是转录后基因沉默 (PTGS)的一种 .RNAi在生物界中广泛存在 .RNAi发生过程主要分为 3个阶段 :起始阶段 ,扩增阶段 ,效应阶段 .RNAi在维持基因组稳定、保护基因组免受外源核酸侵入、基因表达调控等方面发挥重要生物学作用 .RNAi作为基因沉默的一个工具 ,已被广泛用于基因功能研究、基因治疗和新药研究与开发等方面 .     

On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta

The phylogenetic relationships of the Clitellata were investigated with a data set of published and new complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of 51 species representing 41 families. Sequences were aligned on the basis of a secondary structure model and analysed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. In contrast to the latter method, parsimony did not recover the monophyly of Clitellata. However, a close scrutiny of the data suggested a spurious attraction between some polychaetes and clitellates. As a rule, molecular trees are closely aligned with morphology-based phylogenies. Acanthobdellida and Euhirudinea were reconciled in their traditional Hirudinea clade and were included in the Oligochaeta with the Branchiobdellida via the Lumbriculidae as a possible link between the two assemblages. While the 18S gene yielded a meaningful historical signal for determining relationships within clitellates, the exact position of Hirudinea and Branchiobdellida within oligochaetes remained unresolved. The lack of phylogenetic signal is interpreted as evidence for a rapid radiation of these taxa. The placement of Clitellata within the Polychaeta remained unresolved. The biological reality of polytomies within annelids is suggested and supports the hypothesis of an extremely ancient radiation of polychaetes and emergence of clitellates.     

On the ontogeny of the haptor and the evolution of the Monogenea

Data on the ontogeny of the posterior haptor of monogeneans were obtained from more than 150 publications and summarised. These data were plotted into diagrams showing evolutionary capacity levels based on the theory of a progressive evolution of marginal hooks, anchors and other attachment components of the posterior haptor in the Monogenea (Malmberg, 1986). 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks are assumed to be the most primitive monogenean haptoral condition. Thus the diagrams were founded on a 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hook evolutionary capacity level, and the evolutionary capacity levels of anchors and other haptoral attachement components were arranged according to haptoral ontogenetical sequences. In the final plotting diagram data on hosts, type of spermatozoa, oncomiracidial ciliation, sensilla pattern and protonephridial systems were also included. In this way a number of correlations were revealed. Thus, for example, the number of 5 + 5 marginal hooks correlates with the most primitive monogenean type of spermatozoon and with few sensillae, many ciliated cells and a simple protonephridial system in the oncomiracidium. On the basis of the reviewed data it is concluded that the ancient monogeneans with 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks were divided into two main lines, one retaining unhinged marginal hooks and the other evolving hinged marginal hooks. Both main lines have recent representatives at different marginal hook evolutionary capacity levels, i.e. monogeneans retaining a haptor with only marginal hooks. For the main line with hinged marginal hooks the name Articulon-choinea n. subclass is proposed. Members with 8 + 8 hinged marginal hooks only are here called Proanchorea n. superord. Monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks only are here called Ananchorea n. superord. and three new families are erected for its recent members: Anonchohapteridae n. fam., Acolpentronidae n. fam. and Anacanthoridae n. fam. (with 7 + 7, 8 + 8 and 9 + 9 unhinged marginal hooks, respectively). Except for the families of Articulonchoinea (e.g. Acanthocotylidae, Gyrodactylidae, Tetraonchoididae) Bychowsky's (1957) division of the Monogenea into the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea fits the proposed scheme, i.e. monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks form one old group, the Oligonchoinea, which have 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks, and the other group form the Polyonchoinea, which (with the exception of the Hexabothriidae) has a greater number (7 + 7, 8 + 8 or 9 + 9) of unhinged marginal hooks. It is proposed that both these names, Oligonchoinea (sensu mihi) and Polyonchoinea (sensu mihi), will be retained on one side and Articulonchoinea placed on the other side, which reflects the early monogenean evolution. Except for the members of Ananchorea [Polyonchoinea], all members of the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea have anchors, which imply that they are further evolved, i.e. have passed the 5 + 5 marginal hook evolutionary capacity level (Malmberg, 1986). There are two main types of anchors in the Monogenea: haptoral anchors, with anlages appearing in the haptor, and peduncular anchors, with anlages in the peduncle. There are two types of haptoral anchors: peripheral haptoral anchors, ontogenetically the oldest, and central haptoral anchors. Peduncular anchors, in turn, are ontogenetically younger than peripheral haptoral anchors. There may be two pairs of peduncular anchors: medial peduncular anchors, ontogentically the oldest, and lateral peduncular anchors. Only peduncular (not haptoral) anchors have anchor bars. Monogeneans with haptoral anchors are here called Mediohaptanchorea n. superord. and Laterohaptanchorea n. superord. or haptanchoreans. All oligonchoineans and the oldest polyonchoineans are haptanchoreans. Certain members of Calceostomatidae [Polyonchoinea] are the only monogeneans with both (peripheral) haptoral and peduncular anchors (one pair). These monogeneans are here called Mixanchorea n. superord. Polyonchoineans with peduncular anchors and unhinged marginal hooks are here called the Pedunculanchorea n. superord. The most primitive pedunculanchoreans have only one pair of peduncular anchors with an anchor bar, while the most advanced have both medial and lateral peduncular anchors; each pair having an anchor bar. Certain families of the Articulonchoinea, the Anchorea n. superord., also have peduncular anchors (parallel evolution): only one family, the Sundanonchidae n. fam., has both medial and lateral peduncular anchors, each anchor pair with an anchor bar. Evolutionary lines from different monogenean evolutionary capacity levels are discussed and a new system of classification for the Monogenea is proposed.In agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. EditorIn agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. Editor