植物化感作用与生物多样性

本文简要地阐释了化感作用的含义、基本特征以及作用机制,并结合生物多样性理论,综述了化感作用研究中化感物种的多样性、化感物质的多样性及其释放途径的多样性,具体讨论了化感作用对物种多样性、遗传多样性及生态系统多样性中的种群生态、协同进化、土壤生境、生态系统功能和生物入侵等方面的可能影响。文中提出了化感作用的利用、管理应与生物多样性保护相统一的看法,并指出对化感作用与生物多样性的关系以及相互影响机制进行本质的探索,特别是对植物化感作用的生态服务功能与价值评估与探讨,可为保护生物学和系统生态学提供理论基础,这也是今后工作开展的一个重要方向。     

薇甘菊化感物质对土壤氮素矿化的影响及其化感利己作用

【目的】研究入侵植物薇甘菊提取物对土壤氮素矿化的影响及化感利己作用,为薇甘菊通过释放化感物质促进自身生长并排斥本地植物生长提供实验证据,为揭示薇甘菊的入侵机制提供理论依据。【方法】采用经典的化感生测实验、化感物质添加实验以及盆栽控制实验,对比研究薇甘菊及其本地伴生植物水提液和粗提物的化感生测效应、水提液和粗提物添加对土壤氮素的影响以及水提液添加对薇甘菊生长的影响。【结果】与本地伴生种相比,薇甘菊水提液的化感抑制作用较强且促进了土壤硝态氮的生成;而薇甘菊粗提物的化感作用较弱且抑制了土壤铵态氮和硝态氮的生成。水提液盆栽控制实验结果表明,与本地伴生种火炭母相比,薇甘菊水提液具有显著的化感利己作用,这与薇甘菊水提液处理后薇甘菊生长土壤中的蛋白酶活性增强和有效氮含量增加相一致。【结论】薇甘菊可通过水溶性化感物质促进有效氮的生成来实现化感利己作用。     

水稻化感作用及其分子生态学研究进展

综述了近年来国际上研究水稻化感作用的新进展,比较分析了当前常用于室内评价水稻化感作用潜力的几种生物测试法的优缺点,指出了琼脂迟播共培法是较为理想的室内生物测试法并已广泛应用于化感作用研究中。在此基础上,分析了水稻化感作用的数量遗传特性及其QTL定位的研究现状;阐明了水稻化感作用的遗传多样性及其分子生态特性;并就当前普遍关注的焦点问题：逆境条件（如低氮或高伴生杂草密度胁迫）常引起水稻化感作用潜力增大的生理过程与分子机制作了阐述。结合近年来应用差异蛋白组学和生物信息学的研究实例,阐明了逆境引起水稻化感作用增强与其酚类合成代谢相关酶蛋白表达丰度增加,萜类合成代谢相关酶蛋白表达丰度下降有关。就究竟什么是水稻的化感物质及其作用方式等问题作了分析与讨论．指出水稻的化感抑草效应是其众多化感物质综合作用的结果,应重视区分化感物质对靶标杂草的原生作用和进入土壤生态系统中经生物转化后的次生作用。根据当前植物化感作用研究的发展趋势,阐明了进一步研究水稻化感作用的焦点问题,提出了水稻化感作用的根际生物学特性与分子生态学机制,是未来国际上竞相角逐的重点研究领域,并认为以现代系统生物学理论为指导,运用基因组学、蛋白质组学和代谢组学等技术方法,是揭示这一分子生态学过程与机制的重要技术选择和优先研究领域。     

苜蓿化感作用研究进展

苜蓿是一种优良的多年生豆科牧草 ,具有多重生态功能 ,在世界范围内广泛种植。苜蓿在第 2～ 4年后产量逐渐下降 ,而且种过苜蓿的土壤 ,间隔较短时间再种苜蓿 ,很难建植成功。许多研究表明 ,苜蓿体内含有的一些水溶性化学物质不仅能够对其产生自毒作用 ,而且也能对其他植物具有化感作用。本文综述了苜蓿化感作用研究进展 ,包括苜蓿中主要的化感物质、影响苜蓿化感作用的因素、苜蓿化感作用的应用三个方面。同时就苜蓿化感作用今后的研究重点提出一些看法和展望。     

植物化感物质对种子萌发的影响

所有的化感物质都对一些植物的种子萌发产生影响.本文介绍了植物化感作用和化感物质的定义,化感物质的释放方式和种类,然后重点综述了化感物质影响种子萌发的作用机理、内外因素和生态学意义.化感物质通过影响细胞膜透性、细胞分裂生长和分化、呼吸作用、蛋白质合成、基因表达、激素合成和平衡,最终影响种子萌发.化感物质对种子萌发的影响与化感物质的种类、浓度、受体植物种类和环境条件等有关.     

化感作用抑制有害藻类生长的研究进展

利用植物化感作用抑制有害藻类生长的方法具有生态安全性好、快速高效等优点, 为有效控制有害藻类的爆发提供了新思路。论文从化感作用的概念、化感抑藻机理、陆生植物对藻类的化感抑制作用、水生植物对藻类的化感抑制作用等方面进行了论述, 并对植物化感作用抑藻技术的研究方向进行了展望, 提出对化感物质在环境中的降解特性、化感物质选择性抑藻机理及具有活性的化感物质的人工合成等方面需要做更深入的研究。     

番茄对不同养分水平下南美蟛蜞菊和蟛蜞菊化感作用的响应

外来入侵植物分泌的化感物质能够影响本地植物的生长生理特性,养分水平对入侵植物的化感潜力有重要影响。该文通过将番茄植株分别与同种番茄、南美蟛蜞菊、蟛蜞菊植株相邻原位种植,以15%、25%、50%、75%的Hoagland培养液模拟不同养分水平开展温室控制实验,探究在不同养分水平下入侵植物南美蟛蜞菊及其亲缘植物蟛蜞菊的化感作用对本地植物番茄叶绿素荧光参数及生物量的影响。结果表明:(1)番茄在75%养分水平下的叶绿素荧光参数和生物量显著优于其余3个养分水平。(2)随着养分水平降低,番茄叶片的PSⅡ最大光化学效率(F_v/F_m)、PSⅡ实际光合量子产量[Y(Ⅱ)]、光化学淬灭系数(qp)及植株的总生物量显著减少,非光化学淬灭系数(NPQ)和植株根系生物量的分配比例增加。(3)在25% Hoagland培养液处理下,与南美蟛蜞菊混植番茄的F_v/F_m、Y(Ⅱ)、qp和总生物量显著低于与蟛蜞菊混植番茄,NPQ和根系生物量的分配比例显著高于与蟛蜞菊混植番茄。综上结果说明南美蟛蜞菊和蟛蜞菊可能通过根系分泌化感物质抑制番茄的生长发育,且南美蟛蜞菊的化感作用强于蟛蜞菊,而增加栽培基质中的养分水平可以显著降低南美蟛蜞菊和蟛蜞菊对番茄的化感胁迫作用。     

植物化感作用研究中应注意的问题

近年植物化感作用的研究十分活跃,但研究中也存在着一些问题和误区．本文就化感作用的基本定义和研究内容;化感物质的释放途径和研究方法;化感作用与植物竞争和环境胁迫;化感作用的应用潜力等几个主要方面存在的一些易混淆的问题进行讨论,并提出一些看法．     

菊科植物化感作用研究进展

对菊科植物化感作用的研究进展进行了综述。菊科植物中至少有 39个属存在化感作用 ,特别是一枝黄花属、向日葵属、胜红蓟属、银胶菊属、蒿属植物等有较多的研究报道。鉴定出的化感物质多为萜类、聚乙炔类、酚类、有机酸类等 ,这些化感物质对多种受体植物表现出程度不同的抑制或促进的效应。其化感作用机理表现在破坏受体膜系统的稳定性及水分平衡关系、抑制氧化磷酸化、促进或阻滞叶绿素的合成、影响矿质元素的吸收利用等。并对菊科植物化感物质在植物生长调节剂、天然除草剂和生物杀虫剂 ,或人工合成除草剂和杀虫剂上应用的前景进行了探讨。本文显示菊科植物的化感作用将在控制外来恶性杂草及维护生态平衡上扮演重要的角色。在当前菊科植物化感作用研究的基础上 ,提出了进一步研究的 6个方向 :(1)化感物质的生物合成途径与关键酶的特性研究 ;(2 )具化感潜势物种资源的调查评价及利用研究 ;(3)化感作用在自然生态系统中的演变规律 ;(4 )菊科重要作物自毒的生化机制及克服途径 ;(5 )具应用前景的菊科植物化感关键酶的基因克隆和转基因 ,并对受体植物基因的表达与调控进行研究 ;(6 )化感作用在可持续发展农业应用上的研究与开发 ,特别是作为天然除草剂及杀虫剂     

浮游植物的化感作用

生物化感作用研究是近年来兴起的交叉学科,是化学生态学研究的重要领域。研究水域浮游植物化感作用对了解浮游植物之间、浮游植物与其他生物之间的相互作用及作用机理具有重要意义,对了解赤潮和水华的发生机制及其生态控制等具有非常重要的作用。综述了海洋和湖泊浮游植物化感作用和化感物质的内涵,讨论了水体浮游植物化感作用的特点、研究化感作用的基本方法、化感物质的种类以及影响化感物质作用的生物和非生物因素,详细介绍了浮游植物化感物质的作用机理以及逃避和拈抗化感作用的方式,同时对目前研究的热点问题及未来研究的方向做了简要概述。     

Challenges,achievements and opportunities in allelopathy research

Abstract

Allelopathy is defined as the suppression of any aspect of growth and/or development of one plant by another through the release of chemical compounds. Although allelopathic interference has been demonstrated many times using in vitro experiments, few studies have clearly demonstrated allelopathy in natural settings. This difficulty reflects the complexity in examining and demonstrating allelopathic interactions under field conditions. In this paper we address a number of issues related to the complexity of allelopathic interference in higher plants: These are: (i) is a demonstrated pattern or zone of inhibition important in documenting allelopathy? (ii) is it ecologically relevant to explain the allelopathic potential of a species based on a single bioactive chemical? (iii) what is the significance of the various modes of allelochemical release from the plant into the environment? (iv) do soil characteristics clearly influence allelopathic activity? (v) is it necessary to exclude other plant interference mechanisms?, and (vi) how can new achievements in allelopathy research aid in solving problems related to relevant ecological issues encountered in research conducted upon natural systems and agroecosystems? A greater knowledge of plant interactions in ecologically relevant environments, as well as the study of biochemical pathways, will enhance our understanding of the role of allelopathy in agricultural and natural settings. In addition, novel findings related to the relevant enzymes and genes involved in production of putative allelochemicals, allelochemical persistence in the rhizosphere, the molecular target sites of allelochemicals in sensitive plant species and the influence of allelochemicals upon other organisms will likely lead to enhanced utilization of natural products for pest management or as pharmaceuticals and nutraceuticals. This review will address these recent findings, as well as the major challenges which continue to influence the outcomes of allelopathy research.     

Functional correlates of allelopathic potential in a successional plant community

Allelopathy, plant–plant interactions mediated through chemical production, is an active area of ecological research. Despite this widespread interest, we still lack community scale information on the prevalence of this interaction and the types of species that may be expected to be allelopathic. To address this research need, the allelopathic potential of 65 plant species from all stages of succession in the Piedmont region of New Jersey, USA, was determined with laboratory bioassays. The strength of each species’ allelopathic activity was then related to life form, origin, and fundamental plant traits. The vast majority of species tested exhibited significant allelopathic effects in the bioassays, with many of these having fairly strong effects. Overall, the allelopathic potential of species decreased with life span, roughly following the successional transitions from short-lived to long-lived herbs and to woody species. Herbaceous species on average were more allelopathic than woody species, but there was no difference between native and non-native species once life form was accounted for. In a principal components analysis, allelopathy was associated with other plant traits, but these relationships differed between woody and herbaceous species. Allelopathic potential was positively associated with plant height in herbaceous species, but negatively associated with height, leaf mass, and seed mass in woody species. These results indicate that allelopathy may be a quite common ecological strategy in plants and is equally common in both native and non-native species. The linkage of allelopathy with other plant functional traits suggests that allelopathy can and should be integrated into the broader suite of plant strategies that are studied.     

小麦化感作用研究进展

小麦是世界第一大粮食作物,在农业生产中占有重要地位.然而,由于人们为保证小麦产量往往施用大量的除草剂和杀菌剂,对环境造成了极大的危害.小麦化感作用是利用小麦活体或残体向环境中释放次生代谢物质对自身或其他生物产生作用,它克服了除草剂和杀菌剂等引起的环境污染问题,具有抑制杂草控制病害的潜力.本文对已有的小麦化感作用的研究进展情况进行了综合评述.其中小麦对杂草、虫害及病害产生防御功能的主要化感物质为异羟肟酸和酚酸类物质.小麦化感物质活性的发挥除了取决于化感物质的种类外,还由小麦自身的遗传因素、环境因素和生物因素的共同作用所决定.小麦化感物质在根际土壤中的滞留、迁移和转化过程、小麦化感作用与土壤生物的关系以及相关的作用机理是小麦化感作用研究的薄弱环节,其研究方法还需进一步探索改进.小麦化感作用在植物保护、环境保护以及作物育种等方面具有广泛的应用前景,促进了小麦抗逆性的增强以及产量和品质的提高.     

Perspectives on allelopathic disruption of plant mutualisms: a framework for individual- and population-level fitness consequences

Mutualisms with mycorrhizal fungi, pollinators, and seed dispersers are critical for plant survival and reproduction. However, mutualism effectiveness is highly sensitive to disturbance by environmental stressors. Allelopathy is often overlooked, yet likely important, as a potential stress on plant mutualism function. Allelochemicals can affect plant mutualisms by either directly interfering with the plant’s ability to produce resources and rewards for its mutualistic partners or by directly or indirectly altering the non-plant mutualist’s behavior. Here we explore the potential effects of allelochemicals on plant mutualisms. Since allelochemicals can reduce plant growth and carbon acquisition, we suggest that allelopathy could directly diminish: (1) carbon provisioning to mycorrhizal fungi, (2) flower, pollen, and nectar production for pollinators, and (3) fruit attractiveness to seed dispersers. Similarly, allelochemicals that directly affect mycorrhizal fungi functioning can reduce the flow of soil resources to their plant partner. Further, volatile allelochemicals or uptake of allelochemicals from the soil by the plant could alter pollen/nectar or fruit attractiveness and indirectly influence pollinator and seed disperser behavior. Finally, we explore the extent to which plant-produced chemicals could have a direct or indirect positive effect on plant mutualisms. We end using these questions to frame future avenues of research that could help to move studies of allelopathy into the broader ecological context of mutualisms.     

小麦化感作用研究进展

小麦是世界第一大粮食作物,在农业生产中占有重要地位．然而,由于人们为保证小麦产量往往施用大量的除草剂和杀菌剂,对环境造成了极大的危害．小麦化感作用是利用小麦活体或残体向环境中释放次生代谢物质对自身或其他生物产生作用,它克服了除草剂和杀菌剂等引起的环境污染问题,具有抑制杂草控制病害的潜力．本文对已有的小麦化感作用的研究进展情况进行了综合评述．其中小麦对杂草、虫害及病害产生防御功能的主要化感物质为异羟肟酸和酚酸类物质．小麦化感物质活性的发挥除了取决于化感物质的种类外,还由小麦自身的遗传因素、环境因素和生物因素的共同作用所决定．小麦化感物质在根际土壤中的滞留、迁移和转化过程、小麦化感作用与土壤生物的关系以及相关的作用机理是小麦化感作用研究的薄弱环节。其研究方法还需进一步探索改进．小麦化感作用在植物保护、环境保护以及作物育种等方面具有广泛的应用前景,促进了小麦抗逆性的增强以及产量和品质的提高．     

Unravelling the beneficial role of microbial contributors in reducing the allelopathic effects of weeds

The field of allelopathy is one of the most fascinating but controversial processes in plant ecology that offers an exciting, interdisciplinary, complex, and challenging study. In spite of the established role of soil microbes in plant health, their role has also been consolidated in studies of allelopathy. Moreover, allelopathy can be better understood by incorporating soil microbial ecology that determines the relevance of allelopathy phenomenon. Therefore, while discussing the role of allelochemicals in plant–plant interactions, the dynamic nature of soil microbes should not be overlooked. The occurrence and toxicity of allelochemicals in soil depend on various factors, but the type of microflora in the surroundings plays a crucial role because it can interfere with its allelopathic nature. Such microbes could be of prime importance for biological control management of weeds reducing the cost and ill effects of chemical herbicides. Among microbes, our main focus is on bacteria—as they are dominant among other microbes and are being used for enhancing crop production for decades—and fungi. Hence, to refer to both bacteria and fungi, we have used the term microbes. This review discusses the beneficial role of microbes in reducing the allelopathic effects of weeds. The review is mainly focused on various functions of bacteria in (1) reducing allelopathic inhibition caused by weeds to reduce crop yield loss, (2) building inherent defense capacity in plants against allelopathic weed, and (3) deciphering beneficial rhizospheric process such as chemotaxis/biofilm, degradation of toxic allelochemicals, and induced gene expression.     

On laboratory bioassays in allelopathy

Allelopathy involves the complex chain of chemical communications among plants, including microbes. Laboratory bioassays constitute a significant part of allelopathic research, and various bioassays have been proposed to demonstrate allelopathy under controlled lab conditions. However, many lab bioassays have little or no correspondence to field interaction, which may be due to dissimilarity of the conditions of lab bioassay to natural conditions, lack of standardized techniques, or absence of critical controls. Here we discuss several lab bioassays presently used in allelopathic research for their suitability to demonstrate allelopathy of ecological relevance. We recommend avoiding certain practices, such as grinding plant material to evaluate allelopathic potential and isolation of allelochemicals, using seed germination as the only criterion of growth response, using sand, agar, or autoclaved soil, using organic solvents as extractants in allelopathic bioassays, and eliminating microbial involvement. Care should be taken in the lab to simulate natural conditions and attention should be given to habit, habitat, and life cycle pattern of the allelopathic plants during designing of lab bioassays.     

Plant allelochemical interference or soil chemical ecology?

While allelopathy has been defined as plant-plant chemical interference, there has been much confusion about what the concept encompasses and how important it is in nature. We distinguish between (1) direct plant-plant interference mediated by allelochemicals, and (2) the effects of secondary compounds released by plants on abiotic and biotic soil processes that affect other plants.It very difficult to demonstrate direct effects of chemicals released by a plant on nearby plants. Although soil ecology-mediated effects of secondary plant compounds do not fit the classical concept of allelopathy, we find support in the literature for the hypothesis that the most important effects of compounds released into the soil environment by plants on other plants occur through such indirect effects. The emphasis on, and skepticism of, direct plant-plant allelopathic interference has led some researchers to demand unreasonably high standards of evidence for establishing even the existence of allelopathic interactions, standards that are not demanded for other plant-plant interactions such as resource competition. While the complete elucidation of the mechanisms by which allelochemicals function in the field is many years away, such elucidation is not necessary to establish the existence of allelopathic interactions.We propose that most of the phenomena broadly referred to as allelopathic interference are better conceptualized and investigated in terms of soil chemical ecology. Even when direct plant-plant allelochemical interference occur, the levels of allelochemicals in the environment and their effects on plants are heavily influenced by abiotic and biotic components of the soil ecosystem. Putting allelopathy in the context of soil ecology can further research and reduce some of the less fruitful controversy surrounding the phenomenon.