双绕蛋白质的分类与识别

蛋白质折叠识别是蛋白质结构研究的重要内容。双绕是α/β蛋白质中结构典型的常见折叠类型。选取22个家族中序列一致性小于25%的79个典型双绕蛋白质作为训练集,以RMSD为指标进行系统聚类,并对各类建立基于结构比对的概形隐马尔科夫模型(profile-HMM)。将Astral1.65中序列一致性小于95%的9 505个样本作为检验集,整体识别敏感性为93.9%,特异性为82.1%,MCC值为0.876。结果表明:对于成员较多,无法建立统一模型的折叠类型,分类建模可以实现较高准确率的识别。     

蛋白质折叠类型识别方法研究

蛋白质折叠类型识别是一种分析蛋白质结构的重要方法.以序列相似性低于25%的822个全B类蛋白为研究对象,提取核心结构二级结构片段及片段问氢键作用信息为折叠类型特征参数,构建全B类蛋白74种折叠类型模板数据库.定义查询蛋白与折叠类型模板间二级结构匹配函数SS、氢键作用势函数BP及打分函数P,P值最小的模板所对应的折叠类型为查询蛋白的折叠类型.从SCOP1.69中随机抽取三组、每组50个全β类蛋白结构域进行预测,分辨精度分别为56%、56%和42%;对Ding等提供的检验集进行预测,总分辨精度为61.5%.结果和比对表明,此方法是一种有效的折叠类型识别方法.     

基于功能域组分的蛋白质折叠类型识别

蛋白质空间结构研究是分子生物学、细胞生物学、生物化学以及药物设计等领域的重要课题.折叠类型反映了蛋白质核心结构的拓扑模式,对折叠类型的识别是蛋白质序列与结构关系研究的重要内容.选取LIFCA数据库中样本量较大的53种折叠类型,应用功能域组分方法进行折叠识别.将Astral 1.65中序列一致性小于95%的样本作为检验集,全库检验结果中平均敏感性为96.42%,特异性为99.91%,马修相关系数(MCC)为0.91,各项统计结果表明:功能域组分方法可以很好地应用在蛋白质折叠识别中,LIFCA相对简单的分类规则可以很好地集中蛋白质的大部分功能特性,反映了结构与功能的对应关系.     

蛋白质折叠类型分类方法及分类数据库

蛋白质折叠规律研究是生命科学重大前沿课题,折叠分类是蛋白质折叠研究的基础。目前的蛋白质折叠类型分类基本上靠专家完成,不同的库分类并不相同,迫切需要一个建立在统一原理基础上的蛋白质折叠类型数据库。本文以ASTRAL-1.65数据库中序列同源性在25%以下、分辨率小于2.5的蛋白为基础,通过对蛋白质空间结构的观察及折叠类型特征的分析,提出以蛋白质折叠核心为中心、以蛋白质结构拓扑不变性为原则、以蛋白质折叠核心的规则结构片段组成、连接和空间排布为依据的蛋白质折叠类型分类方法,建立了低相似度蛋白质折叠分类数据库——LIFCA,包含259种蛋白质折叠类型。数据库的建立,将为进一步的蛋白质折叠建模及数据挖掘、蛋白质折叠识别、蛋白质折叠结构进化研究奠定基础。     

蛋白质折叠识别方法综述

蛋白质折叠识别算法是蛋白质三维结构预测的重要方法之一,该方法在生物科学的许多方面得到卓有成效的应用。在过去的十年中,我们见证了一系列基于不同计算方式的蛋白质折叠识别方法。在这些计算方法中,机器学习和序列谱-序列谱比对是两种在蛋白质折叠中应用较为广泛和有效的方法。除了计算方法的进展外,不断增大的蛋白质结构数据库也是蛋白质折叠识别的预测精度不断提高的一个重要因素。在这篇文章中,我们将简要地回顾蛋白质折叠中的先进算法。另外,我们也将讨论一些可能可以应用于改进蛋白质折叠算法的策略。     

基于添加模体信息和功率谱密度的组合向量预测27类蛋白质折叠子

以序列相似性低于40%的1895条蛋白质序列构建涵盖27个折叠类型的蛋白质折叠子数据库,从蛋白质序列出发,用模体频数值、低频功率谱密度值、氨基酸组分、预测的二级结构信息和自相关函数值构成组合向量表示蛋白质序列信息,采用支持向量机算法,基于整体分类策略,对27类蛋白质折叠子的折叠类型进行预测,独立检验的预测精度达到了66.67%。同时,以同样的特征参数和算法对27类折叠子的4个结构类型进行了预测,独立检验的预测精度达到了89.24%。将同样的方法用于前人使用过的27类折叠子数据库,得到了好于前人的预测结果。     

基于特征片段信息的PH domain-like barrel 蛋白质折叠类型分类方法

蛋白质折叠类型分类是蛋白质分类研究的重要内容。以SCOP数据库中的 PH domain-like barrel 折叠类型为研究对象,选择序列相似度小于25%的61个样本为检验集,通过结构特征分析,确定了该折叠类型的模板及其对应的特征参数,利用模板与待测蛋白的空间结构比对信息,提出了一个新的折叠类型打分函数Fscore,建立了基于Fscore的蛋白质折叠类型分类方法并用于该折叠类型的分类。用此方法对Astral1.75中序列相似度小于95%的16711个样本进行检验,分类结果的特异性为99.97%。结果表明:特征参数抓住了折叠类型的本质,打分函数Fscore及基于Fscore建立的分类方法可用于 PH domain-like barrel 蛋白质折叠类型自动分类。     

隐马尔科夫过程在生物信息学中的应用

隐马尔科夫过程（hidden markov model,简称HMM）是20世纪70年代提出来的一种统计方法,以前主要用于语音识别。1989年Churchill将其引入计算生物学。目前,HMM是生物信息学中应用比较广泛的一种统计方法,主要用于：线性序列分析、模型分析、基因发现等方面。对HMM进行了简明扼要的描述,并对其在上述几个方面的应用作一概略介绍。     

构建基于折叠核心的全α类蛋白取代矩阵

氨基酸残基取代矩阵是影响多序列比对效果的重要因素,现有的取代矩阵对低相似序列的比对性能较低.在已有的 BLOSUM 取代矩阵算法基础上,定义了基于蛋白质折叠核心结构的序列 结构数据块;提出一种新的基于全α类蛋白质折叠核心结构的氨基酸残基取代矩阵——TOPSSUM25,用于提高低相似度序列的比对效果.将矩阵TOPSSUM25导入多序列比对程序,对相似性小于25%的一组四螺旋束序列 结构数据块的测试结果表明,基于 TOPSSUM25的多序列比对效果明显优于BLOSUM30矩阵;基于一个BAliBASE子集的比对检验也进一步表明, TOPSSUM25在全α类蛋白质的两两序列比对上优于BLOSUM30矩阵.研究结果可为进一步的阐明低同源蛋白质序列 结构 功能关系提供帮助.     

蛋白质二级结构预测: 基于词条的最大熵马尔科夫方法

提出了一种新的蛋白质二级结构预测方法. 该方法从氨基酸序列中提取出和自然语言中的“词”类似的与物种相关的蛋白质二级结构词条, 这些词条形成了蛋白质二级结构词典, 该词典描述了氨基酸序列和蛋白质二级结构之间的关系. 预测蛋白质二级结构的过程和自然语言中的分词和词性标注一体化的过程类似. 该方法把词条序列看成是马尔科夫链, 通过Viterbi算法搜索每个词条被标注为某种二级结构类型的最大概率, 其中使用词网格描述分词的结果, 使用最大熵马尔科夫模型计算词条的二级结构概率. 蛋白质二级结构预测的结果是最优的分词所对应的二级结构类型. 在4个物种的蛋白质序列上对这种方法进行测试, 并和PHD方法进行比较. 试验结果显示, 这种方法的Q3准确率比PHD方法高3.9%, SOV准确率比PHD方法高4.6%. 结合BLAST搜索的局部相似的序列可以进一步提高预测的准确率. 在50个CASP5目标蛋白质序列上进行测试的结果是: Q3准确率为78.9%, SOV准确率为77.1%. 基于这种方法建立了一个蛋白质二级结构预测的服务器, 可以通过http://www.insun.hit.edu.cn:81/demos/biology/index.html来访问.     

Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison

MOTIVATION: Protein homology detection and sequence alignment are at the basis of protein structure prediction, function prediction and evolution. RESULTS: We have generalized the alignment of protein sequences with a profile hidden Markov model (HMM) to the case of pairwise alignment of profile HMMs. We present a method for detecting distant homologous relationships between proteins based on this approach. The method (HHsearch) is benchmarked together with BLAST, PSI-BLAST, HMMER and the profile-profile comparison tools PROF_SIM and COMPASS, in an all-against-all comparison of a database of 3691 protein domains from SCOP 1.63 with pairwise sequence identities below 20%.Sensitivity: When the predicted secondary structure is included in the HMMs, HHsearch is able to detect between 2.7 and 4.2 times more homologs than PSI-BLAST or HMMER and between 1.44 and 1.9 times more than COMPASS or PROF_SIM for a rate of false positives of 10%. Approximately half of the improvement over the profile-profile comparison methods is attributable to the use of profile HMMs in place of simple profiles. Alignment quality: Higher sensitivity is mirrored by an increased alignment quality. HHsearch produced 1.2, 1.7 and 3.3 times more good alignments ('balanced' score >0.3) than the next best method (COMPASS), and 1.6, 2.9 and 9.4 times more than PSI-BLAST, at the family, superfamily and fold level, respectively.Speed: HHsearch scans a query of 200 residues against 3691 domains in 33 s on an AMD64 2GHz PC. This is 10 times faster than PROF_SIM and 17 times faster than COMPASS.     

Protein homology detection and fold inference through multiple alignment entropy profiles

Homology detection and protein structure prediction are central themes in bioinformatics. Establishment of relationship between protein sequences or prediction of their structure by sequence comparison methods finds limitations when there is low sequence similarity. Recent works demonstrate that the use of profiles improves homology detection and protein structure prediction. Profiles can be inferred from protein multiple alignments using different approaches. The "Conservatism-of-Conservatism" is an effective profile analysis method to identify structural features between proteins having the same fold but no detectable sequence similarity. The information obtained from protein multiple alignments varies according to the amino acid classification employed to calculate the profile. In this work, we calculated entropy profiles from PSI-BLAST-derived multiple alignments and used different amino acid classifications summarizing almost 500 different attributes. These entropy profiles were converted into pseudocodes which were compared using the FASTA program with an ad-hoc matrix. We tested the performance of our method to identify relationships between proteins with similar fold using a nonredundant subset of sequences having less than 40% of identity. We then compared our results using Coverage Versus Error per query curves, to those obtained by methods like PSI-BLAST, COMPASS and HHSEARCH. Our method, named HIP (Homology Identification with Profiles) presented higher accuracy detecting relationships between proteins with the same fold. The use of different amino acid classifications reflecting a large number of amino acid attributes, improved the recognition of distantly related folds. We propose the use of pseudocodes representing profile information as a fast and powerful tool for homology detection, fold assignment and analysis of evolutionary information enclosed in protein profiles.     

An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. III. A comparative study of sequence conservation in protein structural families using multiple structural alignments

The information required to generate a protein structure is contained in its amino acid sequence, but how three-dimensional information is mapped onto a linear sequence is still incompletely understood. Multiple structure alignments of similar protein structures have been used to investigate conserved sequence features but contradictory results have been obtained, due, in large part, to the absence of subjective criteria to be used in the construction of sequence profiles and in the quantitative comparison of alignment results. Here, we report a new procedure for multiple structure alignment and use it to construct structure-based sequence profiles for similar proteins. The definition of "similar" is based on the structural alignment procedure and on the protein structural distance (PSD) described in paper I of this series, which offers an objective measure for protein structure relationships. Our approach is tested in two well-studied groups of proteins; serine proteases and Ig-like proteins. It is demonstrated that the quality of a sequence profile generated by a multiple structure alignment is quite sensitive to the PSD used as a threshold for the inclusion of proteins in the alignment. Specifically, if the proteins included in the aligned set are too distant in structure from one another, there will be a dilution of information and patterns that are relevant to a subset of the proteins are likely to be lost.In order to understand better how the same three-dimensional information can be encoded in seemingly unrelated sequences, structure-based sequence profiles are constructed for subsets of proteins belonging to nine superfolds. We identify patterns of relatively conserved residues in each subset of proteins. It is demonstrated that the most conserved residues are generally located in the regions where tertiary interactions occur and that are relatively conserved in structure. Nevertheless, the conservation patterns are relatively weak in all cases studied, indicating that structure-determining factors that do not require a particular sequential arrangement of amino acids, such as secondary structure propensities and hydrophobic interactions, are important in encoding protein fold information. In general, we find that similar structures can fold without having a set of highly conserved residue clusters or a well-conserved sequence profile; indeed, in some cases there is no apparent conservation pattern common to structures with the same fold. Thus, when a group of proteins exhibits a common and well-defined sequence pattern, it is more likely that these sequences have a close evolutionary relationship rather than the similarities having arisen from the structural requirements of a given fold.     

MRFalign: Protein Homology Detection through Alignment of Markov Random Fields

Sequence-based protein homology detection has been extensively studied and so far the most sensitive method is based upon comparison of protein sequence profiles, which are derived from multiple sequence alignment (MSA) of sequence homologs in a protein family. A sequence profile is usually represented as a position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM) or an HMM (Hidden Markov Model) and accordingly PSSM-PSSM or HMM-HMM comparison is used for homolog detection. This paper presents a new homology detection method MRFalign, consisting of three key components: 1) a Markov Random Fields (MRF) representation of a protein family; 2) a scoring function measuring similarity of two MRFs; and 3) an efficient ADMM (Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers) algorithm aligning two MRFs. Compared to HMM that can only model very short-range residue correlation, MRFs can model long-range residue interaction pattern and thus, encode information for the global 3D structure of a protein family. Consequently, MRF-MRF comparison for remote homology detection shall be much more sensitive than HMM-HMM or PSSM-PSSM comparison. Experiments confirm that MRFalign outperforms several popular HMM or PSSM-based methods in terms of both alignment accuracy and remote homology detection and that MRFalign works particularly well for mainly beta proteins. For example, tested on the benchmark SCOP40 (8353 proteins) for homology detection, PSSM-PSSM and HMM-HMM succeed on 48% and 52% of proteins, respectively, at superfamily level, and on 15% and 27% of proteins, respectively, at fold level. In contrast, MRFalign succeeds on 57.3% and 42.5% of proteins at superfamily and fold level, respectively. This study implies that long-range residue interaction patterns are very helpful for sequence-based homology detection. The software is available for download at http://raptorx.uchicago.edu/download/. A summary of this paper appears in the proceedings of the RECOMB 2014 conference, April 2–5.     

AutoSCOP: automated prediction of SCOP classifications using unique pattern-class mappings

MOTIVATION: The sequence patterns contained in the available motif and hidden Markov model (HMM) databases are a valuable source of information for protein sequence annotation. For structure prediction and fold recognition purposes, we computed mappings from such pattern databases to the protein domain hierarchy given by the ASTRAL compendium and applied them to the prediction of SCOP classifications. Our aim is to make highly confident predictions also for non-trivial cases if possible and abstain from a prediction otherwise, and thus to provide a method that can be used as a first step in a pipeline of prediction methods. We describe two successful examples for such pipelines. With the AutoSCOP approach, it is possible to make predictions in a large-scale manner for many domains of the available sequences in the well-known protein sequence databases. RESULTS: AutoSCOP computes unique sequence patterns and pattern combinations for SCOP classifications. For instance, we assign a SCOP superfamily to a pattern found in its members whenever the pattern does not occur in any other SCOP superfamily. Especially on the fold and superfamily level, our method achieves both high sensitivity (above 93%) and high specificity (above 98%) on the difference set between two ASTRAL versions, due to being able to abstain from unreliable predictions. Further, on a harder test set filtered at low sequence identity, the combination with profile-profile alignments improves accuracy and performs comparably even to structure alignment methods. Integrating our method with structure alignment, we are able to achieve an accuracy of 99% on SCOP fold classifications on this set. In an analysis of false assignments of domains from new folds/superfamilies/families to existing SCOP classifications, AutoSCOP correctly abstains for more than 70% of the domains belonging to new folds and superfamilies, and more than 80% of the domains belonging to new families. These findings show that our approach is a useful additional filter for SCOP classification prediction of protein domains in combination with well-known methods such as profile-profile alignment. AVAILABILITY: A web server where users can input their domain sequences is available at http://www.bio.ifi.lmu.de/autoscop.     

HMM-ModE – Improved classification using profile hidden Markov models by optimising the discrimination threshold and modifying emission probabilities with negative training sequences

Background  

Profile Hidden Markov Models (HMM) are statistical representations of protein families derived from patterns of sequence conservation in multiple alignments and have been used in identifying remote homologues with considerable success. These conservation patterns arise from fold specific signals, shared across multiple families, and function specific signals unique to the families. The availability of sequences pre-classified according to their function permits the use of negative training sequences to improve the specificity of the HMM, both by optimizing the threshold cutoff and by modifying emission probabilities to minimize the influence of fold-specific signals. A protocol to generate family specific HMMs is described that first constructs a profile HMM from an alignment of the family's sequences and then uses this model to identify sequences belonging to other classes that score above the default threshold (false positives). Ten-fold cross validation is used to optimise the discrimination threshold score for the model. The advent of fast multiple alignment methods enables the use of the profile alignments to align the true and false positive sequences, and the resulting alignments are used to modify the emission probabilities in the original model.     

Efficient recognition of protein fold at low sequence identity by conservative application of Psi-BLAST: validation

A substantial fraction of protein sequences derived from genomic analyses is currently classified as representing 'hypothetical proteins of unknown function'. In part, this reflects the limitations of methods for comparison of sequences with very low identity. We evaluated the effectiveness of a Psi-BLAST search strategy to identify proteins of similar fold at low sequence identity. Psi-BLAST searches for structurally characterized low-sequence-identity matches were carried out on a set of over 300 proteins of known structure. Searches were conducted in NCBI's non-redundant database and were limited to three rounds. Some 614 potential homologs with 25% or lower sequence identity to 166 members of the search set were obtained. Disregarding the expect value, level of sequence identity and span of alignment, correspondence of fold between the target and potential homolog was found in more than 95% of the Psi-BLAST matches. Restrictions on expect value or span of alignment improved the false positive rate at the expense of eliminating many true homologs. Approximately three-quarters of the putative homologs obtained by three rounds of Psi-BLAST revealed no significant sequence similarity to the target protein upon direct sequence comparison by BLAST, and therefore could not be found by a conventional search. Although three rounds of Psi-BLAST identified many more homologs than a standard BLAST search, most homologs were undetected. It appears that more than 80% of all homologs to a target protein may be characterized by a lack of significant sequence similarity. We suggest that conservative use of Psi-BLAST has the potential to propose experimentally testable functions for the majority of proteins currently annotated as 'hypothetical proteins of unknown function'.