Molecular parameters of genome instability: roles of fragile genes at common fragile sites

Common chromosome fragile sites occur at specific sequences within mammalian genomes that exhibit apparent single-stranded regions in mitotic chromosomes on exposure of cells to replication stress. Recent progress in the characterization of sequences, and more precise mapping of common fragile sites in mammalian and yeast genomes, has led to the exact placement of large common fragile regions straddling the borders of chromosomal G and R bands, with early and late replicating genomic regions, respectively, and could lead to breakthroughs in understanding the function of these evolutionarily conserved but highly recombinogenic chromosome elements. Deficiency of genes involved in DNA damage checkpoint responses, such as ATR, CHK1, HUS1 leads to increased frequency of fragile site instability. Some of these fragile sites, particularly FRA3B, encode genes that are themselves involved in the protection of cells from DNA damage through various mechanisms. Protection of mammalian genomes from accumulation of DNA damage in somatic cells is critical during development, puberty and during the reproductive lifespan, and occurs through mechanisms involving surveillance of the genome for damage, signals to the cell cycle machinery to stop cell cycle progression, signals to repair machinery to repair damage, signals to resume cycling or initiate apoptotic programs, depending on the extent of damage and repair. When genes involved in these processes are altered or deleted, cancer can occur. The tumor suppressor gene, FHIT at the FRA3B locus, and possibly other fragile genes, is a common target of damage and paradoxically encodes a protein with roles in protection from DNA damage.     

DNA instability at chromosomal fragile sites in cancer

Human chromosomal fragile sites are specific genomic regions which exhibit gaps or breaks on metaphase chromosomes following conditions of partial replication stress. Fragile sites often coincide with genes that are frequently rearranged or deleted in human cancers, with over half of cancer-specific translocations containing breakpoints within fragile sites. But until recently, little direct evidence existed linking fragile site breakage to the formation of cancer-causing chromosomal aberrations. Studies have revealed that DNA breakage at fragile sites can induce formation of RET/PTC rearrangements, and deletions within the FHIT gene, resembling those observed in human tumors. These findings demonstrate the important role of fragile sites in cancer development, suggesting that a better understanding of the molecular basis of fragile site instability is crucial to insights in carcinogenesis. It is hypothesized that under conditions of replication stress, stable secondary structures form at fragile sites and stall replication fork progress, ultimately resulting in DNA breaks. A recent study examining an FRA16B fragment confirmed the formation of secondary structure and DNA polymerase stalling within this sequence in vitro, as well as reduced replication efficiency and increased instability in human cells. Polymerase stalling during synthesis of FRA16D has also been demonstrated. The ATR DNA damage checkpoint pathway plays a critical role in maintaining stability at fragile sites. Recent findings have confirmed binding of the ATR protein to three regions of FRA3B under conditions of mild replication stress. This review will discuss recent advances made in understanding the role and mechanism of fragile sites in cancer development.     

Candidate tumor suppressor genes at FRA7G are coamplified with MET and do not suppress malignancy in a gastric cancer

Common fragile sites predispose to specific chromosomal breakage associated with deletion, amplification, and/or translocation in certain forms of cancer. Chromosomal fragile sites not only are susceptible to DNA instability in cancer cells, but may also be associated with genes that contribute to the neoplastic process. FRA7G is a common fragile site containing the candidate tumor suppressor genes CAV1, CAV2, and TESTIN (TES). The human gastric cancer cell line GTL-16 has an amplification of this genomic region and was used to seek evidence for the suppressor candidacy of one of these genes. Our results demonstrate that CAV1, CAV2, and TESTIN are coamplified with the MET oncogene and overexpressed in GTL-16. Somatic mutation was not detected in the coding regions of these genes, although they were each overexpressed. The results show that CAV1, CAV2, and TESTIN are not tumor suppressor genes in this gastric cancer.     

Human chromosome fragility

Fragile sites are heritable specific chromosome loci that exhibit an increased frequency of gaps, poor staining, constrictions or breaks when chromosomes are exposed to partial DNA replication inhibition. They constitute areas of chromatin that fail to compact during mitosis. They are classified as rare or common depending on their frequency within the population and are further subdivided on the basis of their specific induction chemistry into different groups differentiated as folate sensitive or non-folate sensitive rare fragile sites, and as aphidicolin, bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) or 5-azacytidine inducible common fragile sites. Most of the known inducers of fragility share in common their potentiality to inhibit the elongation of DNA replication, particularly at fragile site loci. Seven folate sensitive (FRA10A, FRA11B, FRA12A, FRA16A, FRAXA, FRAXE and FRAXF) and two non-folate sensitive (FRA10B and FRA16B) fragile sites have been molecularly characterized. All have been found to represent expanded DNA repeat sequences resulting from a dynamic mutation involving the normally occurring polymorphic CCG/CGG trinucleotide repeats at the folate sensitive and AT-rich minisatellite repeats at the non-folate sensitive fragile sites. These expanded repeats were demonstrated, first, to have the potential, under certain conditions, to form stable secondary non-B DNA structures (intra-strand hairpins, slipped strand DNA or tetrahelical structures) and to present highly flexible repeat sequences, both conditions which are expected to affect the replication dynamics, and second, to decrease the efficiency of nucleosome assembly, resulting in decondensation defects seen as fragile sites. Thirteen aphidicolin inducible common fragile sites (FRA2G, FRA3B, FRA4F, FRA6E, FRA6F, FRA7E, FRA7G, FRA7H, FRA7I, FRA8C, FRA9E, FRA16D and FRAXB) have been characterized at a molecular level and found to represent relatively AT-rich DNA areas, but without any expanded repeat motifs. Analysis of structural characteristics of the DNA at some of these sites (FRA2G, FRA3B, FRA6F, FRA7E, FRA7G, FRA7H, FRA7I, FRA16D and FRAXB) showed that they contained more areas of high DNA torsional flexibility with more highly AT-dinucleotide-rich islands than neighbouring non-fragile regions. These islands were shown to have the potential to form secondary non-B DNA structures and to interfere with higher-order chromatin folding. Therefore, a common fragility mechanism, characterized by high flexibility and the potential to form secondary structures and interfere with nucleosome assembly, is shared by all the cloned classes of fragile sites. From the clinical point of view, the folate sensitive rare fragile site FRAXA is the most important fragile site as it is associated with the fragile X syndrome, the most common form of familial mental retardation, affecting about 1/4000 males and 1/6000 females. Mental retardation in this syndrome is considered as resulting from the abolition of the FMR1 gene expression due to hypermethylation of the gene CpG islands adjacent to the expanded methylated trinucleotide repeat. FRAXE is associated with X-linked non-specific mental retardation, and FRA11B with Jacobsen syndrome. There is also some evidence that fragile sites, especially common fragile sites, are consistently involved in the in vivo chromosomal rearrangements related to cancer, whereas the possible implication of common fragile sites in neuropsychiatric and developmental disorders is still poorly documented.     

Replication delay along FRA7H, a common fragile site on human chromosome 7, leads to chromosomal instability

Common fragile sites are specific chromosomal loci that show gaps, breaks, or rearrangements in metaphase chromosomes under conditions that interfere with DNA replication. The mechanism underlying the chromosomal instability at fragile sites was hypothesized to associate with late replication time. Here, we aimed to investigate the replication pattern of the common fragile site FRA7H, encompassing 160 kb on the long arm of human chromosome 7. Using in situ hybridization on interphase nuclei, we revealed that the replication of this region is initiated relatively early, before 30% of S phase is completed. However, a high fraction ( approximately 35%) of S-phase nuclei showed allelic asynchrony, indicating that the replication of FRA7H is accomplished at different times in S phase. This allelic asynchrony is not the result of a specific replication time of each FRA7H allele. Analysis of the replication pattern of adjacent clones along FRA7H by using cell population and two-color fluorescent in situ hybridization analyses showed significant differences in the replication of adjacent clones, under normal growth condition and upon aphidicolin treatment. This pattern significantly differed from that of two nonfragile regions which showed a coordinated replication under both conditions. These results indicate that aphidicolin is enhancing an already existing difference in the replication time along the FRA7H region. Based on our replication analysis of FRA7H and on previous analysis of the common fragile site FRA3B, we suggest that delayed replication is underlying the fragility at aphidicolin-induced common fragile sites.     

Molecular basis for expression of common and rare fragile sites

Fragile sites are specific loci that form gaps, constrictions, and breaks on chromosomes exposed to partial replication stress and are rearranged in tumors. Fragile sites are classified as rare or common, depending on their induction and frequency within the population. The molecular basis of rare fragile sites is associated with expanded repeats capable of adopting unusual non-B DNA structures that can perturb DNA replication. The molecular basis of common fragile sites was unknown. Fragile sites from R-bands are enriched in flexible sequences relative to nonfragile regions from the same chromosomal bands. Here we cloned FRA7E, a common fragile site mapped to a G-band, and revealed a significant difference between its flexibility and that of nonfragile regions mapped to G-bands, similar to the pattern found in R-bands. Thus, in the entire genome, flexible sequences might play a role in the mechanism of fragility. The flexible sequences are composed of interrupted runs of AT-dinucleotides, which have the potential to form secondary structures and hence can affect replication. These sequences show similarity to the AT-rich minisatellite repeats that underlie the fragility of the rare fragile sites FRA16B and FRA10B. We further demonstrate that the normal alleles of FRA16B and FRA10B span the same genomic regions as the common fragile sites FRA16C and FRA10E. Our results suggest that a shared molecular basis, conferred by sequences with a potential to form secondary structures that can perturb replication, may underlie the fragility of rare fragile sites harboring AT-rich minisatellite repeats and aphidicolin-induced common fragile sites.     

Characterization of the human common fragile site FRA2G

Common fragile sites are nonrandom loci that show gaps and breaks when cells are exposed to specific compounds. They are preferentially involved in recombination, chromosomal rearrangements, and foreign DNA integration. These sites have been suggested to play a role in chromosome instability observed in cancer. In this work we used a FISH-based approach to identify a BAC contig that spans the FRA2G fragile site located at the 2q31 region. Our observations indicate that a very fragile region spanning at least 450 kb is present within a large fragile region that extends over 1 Mb. At least seven genes are mapped in the fragile region. One of these seems to be a good candidate as a potential tumor suppressor gene impaired by the recurrent deletions observed at the 2q31 region in some neoplasms. In the fragile region, a considerable number of regions of high flexibility that may be related to the fragility are present.     

129 The molecular mechanism of breakage at fragile site FRA16D

Replication stress induces physical breakage at discrete loci in chromosomes, which can be visualized on a metaphase chromosome spread. These common fragile sites (CFS) are conserved across species and are hotspots for sister chromatid recombination, viral integration, rearrangements, translocations, and deletions (Glover et al 2005). Despite multiple theories, the molecular mechanisms of CFS expression and genomic instability are still not well understood. The fragile site FRA16D is of special interest because it is the second most highly expressed fragile site and is located within the WWOX tumor suppressor gene. Previous data identified a polymorphic AT repeat within a FRA16D subregion called F1 that causes chromosome fragility and replication fork stalling in a yeast model (Zhang and Freudenreich 2007). Recently, we have found that breakage increases in an AT repeat length-dependent manner. Our results suggest that the AT repeat in the context of F1 forms a secondary structure, making the region more vulnerable to breakage.     

Secondary structure formation and DNA instability at fragile site FRA16B

Human chromosomal fragile sites are specific loci that are especially susceptible to DNA breakage following conditions of partial replication stress. They often are found in genes involved in tumorigenesis and map to over half of all known cancer-specific recurrent translocation breakpoints. While their molecular basis remains elusive, most fragile DNAs contain AT-rich flexibility islands predicted to form stable secondary structures. To understand the mechanism of fragile site instability, we examined the contribution of secondary structure formation to breakage at FRA16B. Here, we show that FRA16B forms an alternative DNA structure in vitro. During replication in human cells, FRA16B exhibited reduced replication efficiency and expansions and deletions, depending on replication orientation and distance from the origin. Furthermore, the examination of a FRA16B replication fork template demonstrated that the majority of the constructs contained DNA polymerase paused within the FRA16B sequence, and among the molecules, which completed DNA synthesis, 81% of them underwent fork reversal. These results strongly suggest that the secondary-structure-forming ability of FRA16B contributes to its fragility by stalling DNA replication, and this mechanism may be shared among other fragile DNAs.     

Failure of origin activation in response to fork stalling leads to chromosomal instability at fragile sites

Perturbed DNA replication in early stages of cancer development induces chromosomal instability preferentially at fragile sites. However, the molecular basis for this instability is unknown. Here, we show that even under normal growth conditions, replication fork progression along the fragile site, FRA16C, is slow and forks frequently stall at AT-rich sequences, leading to activation of additional origins to enable replication completion. Under mild replication stress, the frequency of stalling at AT-rich sequences is further increased. Strikingly, unlike in the entire genome, in the FRA16C region additional origins are not activated, suggesting that all potential origins are already activated under normal conditions. Thus, the basis for FRA16C fragility is replication fork stalling at AT-rich sequences and inability to activate additional origins under replication stress. Our results provide a mechanism explaining the replication stress sensitivity of fragile sites and thus, the basis for genomic instability during early stages of cancer development.     

普通型脆性位点的研究进展

脆性位点是DNA合成被部分抑制之后,在中期染色体上发生的位点特异的缺口或断裂区域,它也是基因组不稳定的区域。通常脆性位点在体细胞中是稳定的,但它们在许多癌细胞中经常发生缺失或重排。在已发现的80多种脆性位点基因中,研究最多的是FHIT和WWOX,它们与肿瘤的发生发展密切相关。简要综述了普通型脆性位点的研究进展及其与肿瘤的关系。     

Matrix attachment region (MAR) properties and abnormal expansion of AT island minisatellites in FRA16B fragile sites in leukemic CEM cells

AT-rich minisatellites (AT islands) are sites of genomic instability in cancer cells and targets for extremely lethal AT-specific drugs, such as bizelesin. Here we investigated the AT islands in the FRA16B fragile site region for their possible roles in the organization of DNA on the nuclear matrix. The FRA16B AT island nominally spans ~3 kb of mostly >90% A/T DNA. In silico analysis indicates that this domain exhibits characteristics of nuclear matrix attachment regions (MARs): an exceptionally intense computed ‘MAR potential’ and profound duplex destabilization and flexibility. FRA16B repeats specifically bind to isolated nuclear matrices, which indicates their in vitro MAR function. This binding is several-fold greater than that of a known MAR in the c-myc gene. AT islands in fragile sites FRA16B and FRA16D are significantly more abundant in CEM cells that are hypersensitive to bizelesin compared to normal WI-38 cells. FRA16B overabundance in CEM is due to an ~10-fold expansion of FRA16B repeats. The expanded FRA16B minisatellites in CEM cells preferentially localize to the nuclear matrix-associated DNA indicating their in vivo MAR function. The unexpanded repeats in WI-38 cells localize to the loop DNA. The c-myc MAR is also matrix-associated in CEM cells while localizing to loop DNA in WI-38 cells. These results are the first to demonstrate that AT islands in fragile sites can function as MARs both in vitro and in vivo. The ability of FRA16B-mediated MAR sites to rearrange depending on the repeat expansion status could be relevant to both genomic instability of cancer cells and their sensitivity to AT-island targeting drugs.     

The characterization of the common fragile site FRA16D and its involvement in multiple myeloma translocations

Fragile sites appear as breaks, gaps, or decondensations on metaphase chromosomes when cells are grown under specific culture conditions. The breaks are nonrandom, appearing in defined, conserved locations throughout the mammalian genome. Common fragile sites, as their name implies, are present in virtually all individuals. With three common fragile sites cloned, their mechanism of expression and the role, if any, they play in human disease are still unclear. We have assembled a BAC contig of >1 Mb across the second most active common fragile site, FRA16D (16q23.2). We fluorescently labeled these BACs and used them as probes on metaphases from aphidicolin-induced lymphocytes and demonstrated that FRA16D decondensation/breakage occurs over a region of at least 1 Mb. Thus, this is the largest common fragile site cloned to date. Microsatellite markers that map within FRA16D show a very high loss in prostate, breast, and ovarian tumors, indicating that loss within this fragile site may be important in the development or progression of these tumors. In addition, a common t(14q32;16q23) translocation is observed in up to 25% of all multiple myelomas (MM). We localized four of four such cloned t(14;16) MM breakpoints within the FRA16D region. This work further demonstrates that the common fragile sites may play an important role in cancer development.     

A mouse model of the fragile gene FHIT: From carcinogenesis to gene therapy and cancer prevention

Mouse models of tumor suppressors are increasingly useful to investigate biomedical aspects of cancer genetics. Some tumor suppressor genes are located at common fragile sites that are specific chromosomal regions highly susceptible to DNA lesions. The tumor suppressor gene FHIT, at the fragile site FRA3B, is the first fragile gene with a developed and characterized mouse knockout model. The human gene FHIT is frequently deleted in cancers and cancer cell lines of many epithelial tissues, and Fhit protein is absent or reduced in most cancers. The mouse Fhit ortholog is also located at a common fragile site, Fra14A2 on murine chromosome 14, and sustains homozygous deletions in murine cancer cell lines. The Fhit knockout mouse is, therefore, an adequate model to study human FHIT function. To establish an animal model and to explore the role of FHIT in tumorigenesis, we have developed a mouse strain carrying one or two inactivated Fhit alleles. Insights into Fhit mouse genetics that have emerged in the last 7 years, and are reviewed in the present article, allowed for development of new tools in carcinogenesis and gene delivery studies.     

DMD and IL1RAPL1: two large adjacent genes localized within a common fragile site (FRAXC) have reduced expression in cultured brain tumors

Common fragile sites (CFSs) are large regions of profound genomic instability found in all individuals. Spanning the center of the two most frequently expressed CFS regions, FRA3B (3p14.3) and FRA16D (16q23.2), are the 1.5 Mb FHIT gene and the 1.0 Mb WWOX gene. These genes are frequently deleted and/or altered in many different cancers. Both FHIT and WWOX have been demonstrated to function as tumor suppressors, both in vitro and in vivo. A number of other large CFS genes have been identified and are also frequently inactivated in multiple cancers. Based on these data, several additional very large genes were tested to determine if they were derived from within CFS regions, but DCC and RAD51L1 were not. However, the 2.0 Mb DMD gene and its immediately distal neighbor, the 1.8 Mb IL1RAPL1 gene are CFS genes contained within the FRAXC CFS region (Xp21.2-->p21.1). They are abundantly expressed in normal brain but were dramatically underexpressed in every brain tumor cell line and xenograft (derived from an intracranial model of glioblastoma multiforme) examined. We studied the expression of eleven other large CFS genes in the same panel of brain tumor cell lines and xenografts and found reduced expression of multiple large CFS genes in these samples. In this report we show that there is selective loss of specific large CFS genes in different cancers that does not appear to be mediated by the relative instability within different CFS regions. Further, the inactivation of multiple large CFS genes in xenografts and brain tumor cell lines may help to explain why this type of cancer is highly aggressive and associated with a poor clinical outcome.     

Clustering of two fragile sites and seven homeobox genes in human chromosome region 2q31-->q32.1

In this study we have used FISH to examine the relationship between a group of homeobox genes, namely DLX1/DLX2, EVX2 and four HOXD genes (10, 11, 12, 13), that map to region q31 on chromosome 2, and the FRA2G and FRA2H fragile sites located at 2q31 and 2q32.1 respectively. Our results indicate that these homeobox genes lie between the two fragile regions.     

Replication dynamics at common fragile site FRA6E

The replication dynamics at common fragile site FRA6E has been evaluated by molecular combing and interphase fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) in primary human lymphocytes cultured under normal or aphidicolin-induced stress conditions. FRA6E is one of the most frequently expressed common fragile sites of the human genome. It harbours several genes, PARK2 being regarded as the most relevant one. According to the results obtained from interphase FISH analysis, FRA6E can be considered a mid-late-replicating sequence characterised by heterogeneous replication timing. Molecular combing did not reveal specific replication parameters at the fragile site: fork rates were highly comparable to those detected at an early replicating locus (LMNB2) used as control and in very good agreement with the whole-genome data obtained in parallel. The same indication applied to the density of initiation zones, the inter-origin distances from adjacent ongoing forks, the frequencies of unidirectional forks, fork arrest events and asynchronous forks. Interestingly, PARK2 appeared embedded in an early/late replication transition zone, corresponding to intron 8 (162 kb) and to the fragility core of FRA6E. In cells exposed to aphidicolin, few forks progressing at a rather slow rate were observed, the majority of them being unidirectional, but again a specific response of the fragile site was not observed. In summary, at FRA6E the replication process is not impaired per se, but chromosome breakages occur preferentially at an early/late replication transition zone. Aphidicolin might increase the occurrence of breakage events at FRA6E by prolonging the time interval separating the replication of early and late replication domains. These results may be of general significance to address the problem of fragile site instability.     

Dynamic mutations in human genes: A review of trinucleotide repeat diseases

Dynamic mutations in human genes result from unstable trinucleotide repeats embedded within the transcribed region. The changeable nature of these mutations from generation to generation is in contrast to the static inheritance of other single-gene mutational events, e.g. point mutations, deletions, insertions and inversions, typically associated with Mendelian inheritance patterns. Intergenerational instability of dynamic mutations within families has provided an explanation for the genetic anticipation, leading to increasing severity or earlier age of onset in successive generations, associated with certain inherited disorders. While models for genomic instability presume that trinucleotide repeat expansion results from disruption of the DNA replication process, experimental evidence has not yet been obtained in support of this contention. Nevertheless, examples of unstable trinucleotide repeats continue to increase, although not all are associated with a specific phenotype. Five disorders resulting from small-scale expansions of CAG repeats within the protein-coding region are known: spinobulbar muscular atrophy, Huntington’s disease, spinocerebellar ataxia type 1, dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA) and Machado-Joseph disease. A sixth disorder, Haw River syndrome, is allelic to DRPLA. Five folate-sensitive chromosomal fragile sites characterized to date, viz. FRAXA, FRAXE, FRAXF, FRA11B and FRA16A, all have large-scale CGG repeat expansion. Two disorders, fragile X syndrome and FRAXE mental retardation, result from instability of CGG repeats in the 5’ untranslated region ofFMR1 andF M R2 genes respectively. FRA11B lies close to chromosome 1 1q deletion endpoints in many Jacobsen syndrome patients and may be related to the deletion event producing partial aneuploidy for 1lq. Expansion of FRAXF and FRA16A has not been associated with a phenotype. Myotonic dystrophy results from a large-scale CTG expansion in the 3’ untranslated region of the myotonin protein kinase gene while Friedreich’s ataxia has recently been found to have a large-scale GAA repeat in the first intron ofX25. This article reviews the characteristics of trinucleotide repeat disorders and summarizes current understanding of the molecular pathophysiology.     

The neurobeachin gene spans the common fragile site FRA13A

Common fragile sites are normal constituents of chromosomal structure prone to chromosomal breakage. In humans, the cytogenetic locations of more than 80 common fragile sites are known. The DNA at 11 of them has been defined and characterized at the molecular level. According to the Genome Database, the common fragile site FRA13A maps to chromosome band 13q13.2. Here, we identify the precise genomic position of FRA13A, and characterize the genetic complexity of the fragile DNA sequence. We show that FRA13A breaks are limited to a 650 kb region within the neurobeachin (NBEA) gene, which genomically spans approximately 730 kb. NBEA encodes a neuron-specific multidomain protein implicated in membrane trafficking that is predominantly expressed in the brain and during development.     

Sites of genetic instability in mitosis and cancer

Certain chromosomal regions called common fragile sites are prone to difficulty during replication. Many tumors have been shown to contain alterations at fragile sites. Several models have been proposed to explain why these sites are unstable. Here we describe work to investigate models of fragile site instability using a yeast artificial chromosome carrying human DNA from a common fragile site region. In addition, we describe a yeast system to investigate whether repair of breaks at a naturally occurring fragile site in yeast, FS2, involves mitotic recombination between homologous chromosomes, leading to loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Our initial evidence is that repair of yeast fragile site breaks does lead to LOH, suggesting that human fragile site breaks may similarly contribute to LOH in cancer. This work is focused on gaining understanding that may enable us to predict and prevent the situations and environments that promote genetic changes that contribute to tumor progression.