DNA修复——基因组稳定性护卫机制的原创与发现之旅

基因组DNA是遗传的物质基础,编码的信息指导生物种系的复制延续、生命体的生长发育和代谢活动。无论是在外环境因素的应激压力下还是处于正常状态,DNA损伤时刻在发生,由此,DNA损伤修复作为重要的细胞内在机制,在维护基因组稳定性、降低癌症等人类系列重大疾病风险中发挥了不可替代作用。三位科学家汤姆·林达尔(Tomas Lindahl)、阿齐兹·桑贾尔（Aziz Sancar）、保罗·莫德里奇（Paul Modrich）因发现和揭示DNA修复及其机制的杰出贡献,获得2015年诺贝尔化学奖。本文综述了三位获奖者分别在DNA损伤的碱基切除修复、核苷酸切除修复和错配修复研究中的原创发现,以及相应的修复通路机制的描绘。此3种修复通路,主要是针对紫外线和化学物所致DNA的碱基损伤、嘧啶二聚体及加合物或者DNA复制过程中发生的碱基错误配对的修复。恰巧,2015年拉斯克基础医学研究奖授予的两位科学家,也因他们揭示了DNA损伤应答现象和机制研究的重大贡献而获奖,本文也呈现了获奖者的关键性科学发现。最后,简要展望了中国DNA损伤修复领域的发展。     

重离子辐照酿酒酵母DNA损伤修复途径研究进展

重离子辐照通过直接和间接作用导致生物体DNA产生损伤,包括DNA的链断裂、碱基的插入或丢失以及氧化损伤等.DNA损伤直接影响复制、转录和蛋白质合成,同时还是突变的重要原因,因此,DNA损伤修复系统尤为重要.在酿酒酵母中,这些损伤主要是通过同源重组修复(homologous recombination repair,HRR)、碱基错配修复(mismatch repair,MMR)和碱基切除修复(base excision repair,BER)等途径来修复的.作为真核生物研究的模式生物,对于酿酒酵母DNA损伤修复的HRR、MMR和BER途径研究颇多,也不断有一些新的成果出现,特别是对于相关途径的完善和相关蛋白的深化更是研究热点,在此对近年来有关重离子辐照酿酒酵母DNA损伤修复途径方面的研究做一综述.     

DNA损伤修复基本方式的研究进展

DNA损伤修复基因可修复由不同原因导致的DNA损伤．从而保护遗传信息的完整性。DNA损伤修复有3种基本形式,即碱基切除修复、核苷酸切除修复和错配修复。本文综述了DNA损伤修复3种基本形式的研究进展情况并讨论了DNA链断裂重组和重接合修复及DNA聚合酶绕道修复DNA损伤。     

诺贝尔化学奖和拉斯克基础医学研究奖共同奖励DNA修复机制研究

<正>2015年诺贝尔化学奖授予瑞典出生的托马斯·林达尔(Tomas Lindahl)、美国人保罗·莫里奇(Paul Modrich)和土耳其出生的阿齐兹·桑卡尔(Aziz Sancar),以奖励他们在"DNA修复机制研究"中的杰出贡献.2015年拉斯克基础医学研究奖虽然也奖给DNA损伤修复主题,但获奖人却不同,授予了两位美国人伊夫林·威特金(Evelyn M.Witkin)和史蒂芬·埃利奇(Stephen J.Elledge),以奖励他们     

PNKP在DNA损伤修复中的作用

多聚核苷酸激酶/磷酸酶(polynucleotide kinase/phosphatase,PNKP)是一种DNA末端修复酶,同时具有激酶和磷酸酶活性,在DNA单链断裂修复途径、碱基切除修复途径以及DNA双链断裂修复中的非同源末端连接途径中发挥着至关重要的作用。近年来,由于一种与PNKP相关的常染色体隐性遗传病——MCSZ综合征的发现,使得人们对PNKP的关注度进一步增加。笔者从与PNKP相互作用的X射线交叉互补修复基因1(X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1,XRCC1)、X射线交叉互补修复基因4(X-ray repair cross-complementing group 4,XRCC4)和毛细血管扩张性共济失调突变基因(ataxia-telangiectasia mutated,ATM)入手,对PNKP在DNA损伤修复中的作用进行概述。     

重组 E.coli 解旋酶Ⅱ（UvrD）的DNA结合及解螺旋功能分析

E.coli 解旋酶Ⅱ（UvrD）是一种在甲基定向错配修复（methyl-directed mismatch repair, MMR）和核苷酸切除修复（nucleotide excision repair,NER）中起重要作用的3′→5′解旋酶.本研究对大肠杆菌的UvrD进行了重组表达和纯化,并检测其ATP酶比活性（87　U/mg）. 利用表面等离子共振（surface plasmon resonance, SPR）方法实时检测了UvrD与同源双链DNA分子（homoduplex DNA）和异源双链DNA分子（heteroduplex DNA）结合的动态过程以及镁离子对此过程的影响.结果显示,UvrD与DNA的平衡解离常数在10 ^－7mol/L 水平. DNA分子中错配碱基的存在,在一定程度上影响了二者的结合,而镁离子不是两者结合的必要因素.本研究还利用原子力显微镜（atomic force microscopy,AFM）方法在单分子水平上观察到UvrD将双链DNA解链形成单链DNA的中间体.此研究得到的UvrD与DNA结合的动力学信息数据以及解螺旋中间体的单分子可视化,为进一步深入研究UvrD在修复过程中的作用机制奠定了基础.     

表观遗传调控：基于染色质环境的DNA双链断裂修复

DNA双链断裂（DNA double-strand breaks, DSBs）是威胁基因组完整性和细胞存活的最有害的DNA损伤类型。同源重组（homologous recombination,HR）和非同源末端连接（non-homologous end joining,NHEJ）是修复DNA双链断裂的两种主要途径。DSB修复涉及到损伤部位修复蛋白的募集和染色质结构的改变。在DNA双链断裂诱导下,染色质结构的动态变化在时间和空间上受到严格调控,进而对DNA双链断裂修复过程进行精细调节。特定的染色质修饰形成利于修复的染色质状态,有助于DNA双链断裂修复机器的招募、修复途径的选择和DNA损伤检查点的活化;其中修复途径的选择对于基因组稳定性至关重要。修复不当或失败可导致基因组不稳定性,甚至促进肿瘤的发生。本文综述了染色质结构和染色质修饰的动态变化在DSB修复中的重要作用。此外,文章还总结了在癌症治疗中靶向关键染色质调控因子在基因组稳定性维持、肿瘤发生发展以及潜在临床应用价值等方面的进展。     

替莫唑胺治疗胶质母细胞瘤的耐药性产生机制研究进展

胶质母细胞瘤作为胶质瘤中恶性程度最高的原发性脑部肿瘤,具有治愈率低、复发率高、呈浸润性生长等特点,在不使用化疗药物的情况下,患者中位生存期仅为12.1个月。胶质母细胞瘤患者的标准治疗方法以手术切除为主,放化疗为辅,其中替莫唑胺（temozolomide,TMZ）作为一种新型的口服烷化剂,是目前用于胶质瘤化学治疗的一线药物。但经过替莫唑胺治疗后,患者中位生存期仅提高了2个月,主要原因为胶质母细胞瘤可对TMZ产生耐药性。胶质母细胞瘤对TMZ产生的耐药机制主要为DNA修复机制,其包括了O⁶?甲基鸟嘌呤DNA甲基转移酶（O⁶?methyl guanine DNA methyltransferase,MGMT）对药物作用位点进行的直接修复、错配修复（mismatch repair,MMR）及碱基切除修复（base excision repair,BER）,这些修复机制可修复TMZ引起的DNA损伤,从而降低肿瘤细胞对TMZ敏感性。通过对近年来胶质母细胞瘤的TMZ耐药机制的研究进展进行介绍,旨在为发展新的治疗手段提供理论基础。     

碱基切除修复与分枝杆菌基因组稳定性

维持基因组稳定是生物生存的基础。碱基切除修复(base excision repair,BER)是修复损伤DNA、维持基因组稳定的主要方式之一。碱基切除修复对结核分枝杆菌等胞内致病菌尤其重要。fpg编码碱基切除修复的关键酶。本文通过比较分枝杆菌的基因组,发现结核菌较其他非致病分枝杆菌具有更多的碱基切除修复基因。这提示碱基切除修复可能对结核菌在宿主体内存活和致病至关重要。这条途径也许是新结核病药物研发的重要靶标。     

三名学者获诺贝尔化学奖 表彰其DNA修复研究

<正>北京时间10月7日下午,瑞典皇家科学院将今年的"诺贝尔化学奖"颁发给了三位科学家,以表彰他们对于DNA修复的机理研究。获奖者分别是来自瑞典的Tomas Lindahl、美国的Paul Modrich和土耳其的Aziz Sancar。其中,Tomas Lindahl是中     

DNA Repair Mechanisms and the Bypass of DNA Damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

DNA repair mechanisms are critical for maintaining the integrity of genomic DNA, and their loss is associated with cancer predisposition syndromes. Studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have played a central role in elucidating the highly conserved mechanisms that promote eukaryotic genome stability. This review will focus on repair mechanisms that involve excision of a single strand from duplex DNA with the intact, complementary strand serving as a template to fill the resulting gap. These mechanisms are of two general types: those that remove damage from DNA and those that repair errors made during DNA synthesis. The major DNA-damage repair pathways are base excision repair and nucleotide excision repair, which, in the most simple terms, are distinguished by the extent of single-strand DNA removed together with the lesion. Mistakes made by DNA polymerases are corrected by the mismatch repair pathway, which also corrects mismatches generated when single strands of non-identical duplexes are exchanged during homologous recombination. In addition to the true repair pathways, the postreplication repair pathway allows lesions or structural aberrations that block replicative DNA polymerases to be tolerated. There are two bypass mechanisms: an error-free mechanism that involves a switch to an undamaged template for synthesis past the lesion and an error-prone mechanism that utilizes specialized translesion synthesis DNA polymerases to directly synthesize DNA across the lesion. A high level of functional redundancy exists among the pathways that deal with lesions, which minimizes the detrimental effects of endogenous and exogenous DNA damage.     

Removal of N-6-methyladenine by the nucleotide excision repair pathway triggers the repair of mismatches in yeast gap-repair intermediates

Gap-repair assays have been an important tool for studying the genetic control of homologous recombination in yeast. Sequence analysis of recombination products derived when a gapped plasmid is diverged relative to the chromosomal repair template additionally has been used to infer structures of strand-exchange intermediates. In the absence of the canonical mismatch repair pathway, mismatches present in these intermediates are expected to persist and segregate at the next round of DNA replication. In a mismatch repair defective (mlh1Δ) background, however, we have observed that recombination-generated mismatches are often corrected to generate gene conversion or restoration events. In the analyses reported here, the source of the aberrant mismatch removal during gap repair was examined. We find that most mismatch removal is linked to the methylation status of the plasmid used in the gap-repair assay. Whereas more than half of Dam-methylated plasmids had patches of gene conversion and/or restoration interspersed with unrepaired mismatches, mismatch removal was observed in less than 10% of products obtained when un-methylated plasmids were used in transformation experiments. The methylation-linked removal of mismatches in recombination intermediates was due specifically to the nucleotide excision repair pathway, with such mismatch removal being partially counteracted by glycosylases of the base excision repair pathway. These data demonstrate that nucleotide excision repair activity is not limited to bulky, helix-distorting DNA lesions, but also targets removal of very modest perturbations in DNA structure. In addition to its effects on mismatch removal, methylation reduced the overall gap-repair efficiency, but this reduction was not affected by the status of excision repair pathways. Finally, gel purification of DNA prior to transformation reduced gap-repair efficiency four-fold in a nucleotide excision repair-defective background, indicating that the collateral introduction of UV damage can potentially compromise genetic interpretations.     

Repair of Oxidative DNA Damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Malfunction of enzymes that detoxify reactive oxygen species leads to oxidative attack on biomolecules including DNA and consequently activates various DNA repair pathways. The nature of DNA damage and the cell cycle stage at which DNA damage occurs determine the appropriate repair pathway to rectify the damage. Oxidized DNA bases are primarily repaired by base excision repair and nucleotide incision repair. Nucleotide excision repair acts on lesions that distort DNA helix, mismatch repair on mispaired bases, and homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining on double stranded breaks. Post-replication repair that overcomes replication blocks caused by DNA damage also plays a crucial role in protecting the cell from the deleterious effects of oxidative DNA damage. Mitochondrial DNA is also prone to oxidative damage and is efficiently repaired by the cellular DNA repair machinery. In this review, we discuss the DNA repair pathways in relation to the nature of oxidative DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.     

DNA excision repair at telomeres

DNA damage is caused by either endogenous cellular metabolic processes such as hydrolysis, oxidation, alkylation, and DNA base mismatches, or exogenous sources including ultraviolet (UV) light, ionizing radiation, and chemical agents. Damaged DNA that is not properly repaired can lead to genomic instability, driving tumorigenesis. To protect genomic stability, mammalian cells have evolved highly conserved DNA repair mechanisms to remove and repair DNA lesions. Telomeres are composed of long tandem TTAGGG repeats located at the ends of chromosomes. Maintenance of functional telomeres is critical for preventing genome instability. The telomeric sequence possesses unique features that predispose telomeres to a variety of DNA damage induced by environmental genotoxins. This review briefly describes the relevance of excision repair pathways in telomere maintenance, with the focus on base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER), and mismatch repair (MMR). By summarizing current knowledge on excision repair of telomere damage and outlining many unanswered questions, it is our hope to stimulate further interest in a better understanding of excision repair processes at telomeres and in how these processes contribute to telomere maintenance.     

Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA repair processes: an update

The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae plays a central role in contributing to the understanding of one of the most important biological process, DNA repair, that maintains genuine copies of the cellular chromosomes. DNA lesions produce either spontaneously or by DNA damaging agents are efficiently repaired by one or more DNA repair proteins. While some DNA repair proteins function independently as in the case of base excision repair, others belong into three separate DNA repair pathways, nucleotide excision, mismatch, and recombinational. Of these pathways, nucleotide excision and mismatch repair show the greatest functional conservation between yeast and human cells. Because of this high degree of conservation, yeast has been regarded as one of the best model system to study DNA repair. This report therefore updates current knowledge of the major yeast DNA repair processes.     

DNA 去甲基化机制的研究进展*

DNA甲基化作为动植物体内一种重要的表观遗传修饰形式,在调控基因表达、维持基因组的稳定性等方面发挥重要的生物学作用。固有DNA甲基化水平和模式的变化会导致生物的表型异常甚至死亡。而5-甲基胞嘧啶的水平和模式是由DNA甲基化和去甲基化共同决定的。DNA去甲基化可以分为主动去甲基化与被动去甲基化,而基因组甲基化模式的形成主要依赖于主动去甲基化。本文综述了生物体内DNA主动去甲基化五种潜在机制:DNA转葡糖基酶参与的碱基切除修复途径、脱氨酶参与的碱基切除修复途径、核苷酸切除修复途径、氧化作用去甲基化与水解作用去甲基化。     

DNA base repair – recognition and initiation of catalysis

Endogenous DNA damage induced by hydrolysis, reactive oxygen species and alkylation modifies DNA bases and the structure of the DNA duplex. Numerous mechanisms have evolved to protect cells from these deleterious effects. Base excision repair is the major pathway for removing base lesions. However, several mechanisms of direct base damage reversal, involving enzymes such as transferases, photolyases and oxidative demethylases, are specialized to remove certain types of photoproducts and alkylated bases. Mismatch excision repair corrects for misincorporation of bases by replicative DNA polymerases. The determination of the 3D structure and visualization of DNA repair proteins and their interactions with damaged DNA have considerably aided our understanding of the molecular basis for DNA base lesion repair and genome stability. Here, we review the structural biochemistry of base lesion recognition and initiation of one-step direct reversal (DR) of damage as well as the multistep pathways of base excision repair (BER), nucleotide incision repair (NIR) and mismatch repair (MMR).     

天然产物产生菌自抗性中DNA损伤修复的研究进展

临床上使用的抗生素大多是由微生物次级代谢产生的天然产物及其衍生物,这类化合物可以抑制微生物的生长,具有显著的细胞毒性。产生菌在合成这些抗生素的同时,也需要通过多种自抗性机制来应对其对自身的毒害作用。本文总结了近年来DNA损伤修复途径参与的天然产物产生菌自抗性机制的研究进展,重点介绍了DNA损伤类抗生素产生菌中的碱基切除修复途径和类核苷酸切除修复途径等,并对目前DNA损伤修复抗性机制中存在的问题进行了讨论,同时对其潜在的应用进行了展望。     

My Journey to DNA Repair

I completed my medical studies at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm but have always been devoted to basic research. My longstanding interest is to understand fundamental DNA repair mechanisms in the fields of cancer therapy, inherited human genetic disorders and ancient DNA. I initially measured DNA decay, including rates of base loss and cytosine deamination. I have discovered several important DNA repair proteins and determined their mechanisms of action. The discovery of uracil-DNA glycosylase defined a new category of repair enzymes with each specialized for different types of DNA damage. The base excision repair pathway was first reconstituted with human proteins in my group. Cell-free analysis for mammalian nucleotide excision repair of DNA was also developed in my laboratory. I found multiple distinct DNA ligases in mammalian cells, and led the first genetic and biochemical work on DNA ligases Ⅰ, and Ⅳ. I discovered the mammalian exonucleases DNase Ⅲ (TREX1) and IV (FEN1). Interestingly, expression of TREX1 was altered in some human autoimmune diseases. I also showed that the mutagenic DNA adduct O6-methylguanine (O6 mG) is repaired without removing the guanine from DNA, identifying a surprising mechanism by which the methyl group is transferred to a residue in the repair protein itself. A further novel process of DNA repair discovered by my research group is the action of AlkB as an iron-dependent enzyme carrying out oxidative demethylation.