无创DNA检测在唐氏综合征产前筛查中的作用

目的:通过比较无创DNA检测和孕中期血清学筛查两种方法的筛查阳性率,从而肯定无创DNA检测在唐氏综合征产前筛查中的实用价值.方法:对500例单胎孕妇进行血清标记物(AFP+β-HCG)-联指标检测,应用配套软件计算唐氏综合征风险;对496例孕妇外周血中的游离DNA片段(含胎儿游离DNA)进行高通量测序,并将测序结果进行生物信息学分析,得出胎儿发生染色体非整倍体的风险率,并追踪胎儿和孕妇的情况.结果:唐氏综合征血清筛查组高危孕妇22例、阳性率为4.4％,假阳性率4.2％;无创DNA检测组筛查阳性孕妇3例,阳性率为0.6％,唐氏综合征检出率为100％.两种方法用于唐氏综合征产前筛查的差异有显著性(P＜0.01).结论:无创DNA检测适用范围广、准确率高,是产前筛查是唐氏综合征的有效方法.     

孕中期超声联合无创产前基因筛查在检出染色体异常胎儿中的应用价值

摘要 目的：孕中期超声联合无创产前基因筛查（NIPT）在染色体异常胎儿检出中的应用价值。方法：选取2019年8月～2021年12月在石家庄市妇幼保健院产前检查的2000例孕中期孕妇,均接受超声检查和NIPT筛查。以羊水穿刺或引产后高通量测序结果为金标准,四格表法分析孕中期超声联合NIPT在染色体异常胎儿检出中的应用价值。结果：2000例孕中期孕妇中,超声检查共检出软指标异常37例,结构指标异常30例。NIPT筛查检出高风险孕妇17例,其中21-三体综合征11例、18-三体综合征6例。超声软指标和结构指标联合NIPT诊断胎儿染色体异常的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、漏诊率、误诊率、准确率分别为95.00%、99.95%、95.00%、99.95%、5.00%、0.05%、99.90%。结论：联合孕中期超声和NIPT可提高检出高风险染色体异常胎儿的灵敏度,降低漏诊率,对于早发现染色体异常胎儿具有重要价值,进而提高生育质量。     

无创DNA检测技术在产前胎儿非整倍体筛查中的应用

目的:探讨无创DNA检测技术在孕妇产前临床检测中的应用。方法:对276例孕妇进行胎儿无创DNA产前检测,包括高龄(年龄≥35岁)、唐筛结果为高风险或单项指标异常、超声软指标异常者。结果:276例中,267例检测为低风险,9例检测为高风险。高风险包括5例提示21-三体综合征、2例提示18-三体综合征、1例提示13-三体综合征、1例提示胎儿性染色体DNA含量不足。9例异常者经羊水和脐血穿刺检测证实与无创DNA结果吻合,准确率为100%。结论:无创DNA产前检测针对胎儿21-、18-、13-三体综合征筛查,具有简单安全、可靠等优点,较血清学筛查有着无可比拟的优越性。这项技术大大减少了有创产前诊断人数,将作为一种筛查技术大规模应用于临床,是未来发展的趋势。     

无创产前DNA检测可有效筛查唐氏综合症降低出生缺陷

为了探究无创产前DNA检测筛查唐氏综合症降低出生缺陷的效果,本研究选择2012年4月至2017年12月我院收治的孕期产检6 192例孕妇作为研究对象,应用DNA测序方法对孕妇血浆中胎儿游离DNA进行染色体非整倍体检测,并检测其灵敏度和特异性,同时采用羊水核型分析两种结果。研究显示,阳性共73例,69例做了进一步检查,显示40例胎儿染色体检查核型正常继续妊娠,29例染色体异常。比较不同年龄组的孕妇血清学筛查唐氏综合征高风险情况,研究表明随着孕妇年龄的增加,DS阳性率逐渐降低(p0.05);血清学筛查后胎儿游离DNA (cffDNA)检测与染色体核型分析的阳性例数基本一致(p0.05)。本研究表明,采用产前无创检测胎儿游离DNA操作方便,检测灵敏度和特异性高,不会对胎儿的正常发育造成不良影响,且阳性检测率与羊水核染色体核型结果基本相同,是无创产前诊断唐氏综合征的重要方法,值得在临床上推广使用。     

颈项透明层厚度超声联合无创DNA对孕妇胎儿染色体非整倍体异常诊断效能的影响

摘要 目的：探讨颈项透明层(nuchal translucency,NT)厚度超声联合无创DNA对孕妇胎儿染色体非整倍体异常诊断效能的影响。方法：2018年7月到2020年4月选择在本院进行产前筛查的孕妇120例,所有孕妇都给予NT厚度超声联合无创DNA检查,采用羊水穿刺分析检测结果为阳性的胎儿情况。结果：120例胎儿的NT厚度为0.8~10 mm,平均厚度为1.57±0.41 mm;不同孕妇年龄的NT厚度对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。以羊水穿刺检测结果为金标准,120例胎儿中检出染色体非整倍体异常7例,NT超声检出12例,无创DNA检出13例,联合检出14例。NT超声、无创DNA与联合诊断的染色体非整倍体异常敏感性为57.1%、85.7%和100.0%,特异性为92.9%、93.8%和93.8%。检测结果为阳性的14例胎儿中,还包括3例淋巴水囊瘤,2例单脐动脉伴胎儿宫内发育迟缓,1例胎儿双肾畸形,1例胎儿并腿畸形。结论：颈项透明层厚度超声联合无创DNA在孕妇胎儿染色体非整倍体异常中的诊断具有操作简便、无创伤等特点,诊断敏感性与特异性都比较高,可对临床医生遗传咨询有一定的参考价值。     

1200 例孕中期产前筛查结果的回顾性分析

目的:评价孕妇血清标记物(甲胎蛋白AFP、β-绒毛膜促性腺激素β-hCG和雌三醇uE3)的孕中期三联筛查在临床中的应用价值。方法:采用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)对1200例孕中期(14～22周)孕妇进行血清标记物AFP、β-hCG和uE3的检测,结合孕龄、孕周、体重等因素,经专门的筛查分析软件,计算唐氏综合征,18三体及神经管缺陷(NTD)的风险率。如孕妇为高风险,则进行胎儿的超声检查和染色体核型分析的产前诊断。结果:在1200例孕妇中,筛查高风险的孕妇有73例,其中唐氏综合征,18三体,NTD高风险孕妇分别为65例,5例和3例,假阳性率为6.08%(73/1200)。其中59例接受了产前诊断,占高风险孕妇的80.8%(59/73)。共检出1例唐氏综合征儿和1例无脑儿,未发现18三体,检出率为100%(2/2),未有漏诊的情况。妊娠不良结局在筛查高风险组和低风险组的比率分别为17.1%和1.32%,两组有显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论:利用孕妇血清标记物(AFP、β-hCG和uE3)的孕中期无创伤性产前筛查,结合产前诊断,对减少出生缺陷儿的出生,具有重要意义,并且高风险的筛查结果对胎儿的预后有一定的提示作用。     

产前超声在中孕期胎儿严重先天性心脏病筛查中的应用

目的:探究产前超声检查在中孕期胎儿严重先天性心脏病(CHD)筛查中的应用。方法:选择2012年1月至2014年1月在我院妇产科进行产前常规超声检查的孕妇12076例,年龄22-41岁,平均(28.6±8.3)岁,孕周20-36周,平均(25.2±6.7)周。将符合纳入排除标准的孕妇8953例作为研究对象,其中初产妇6023例,经产妇2930例。对纳入研究的孕妇行彩色多普勒超声检查,并对妊娠结局进行追踪,将确诊情况与筛查结果进行比较分析。结果:产前彩色多普勒超声诊断出胎儿CHD38例,经尸检或新生儿彩色多普勒超声检查均确诊为CHD,对胎儿期未筛查出CHD的孕妇进行新生儿彩色多普勒超声检查,确诊4例,产前超声检查胎儿CHD检出率为90.48%(38/42),检出准确率100%(38/38)。结论:彩色多普勒超声筛查孕中期胎儿CHD,灵敏度和特异性高,安全无创伤,操作简便快速,值得推广为产前筛查的首选方法。     

孕妇生殖道B族链球菌感染与胎膜早破的关系及其对母婴预后和新生儿听力筛查的影响

目的:探讨孕妇生殖道B族链球菌(GBS)感染与胎膜早破(PROM)的关系及其对母婴预后和新生儿听力筛查的影响。方法:选取2017年1月到2019年1月期间在我院接受治疗的PROM患者100例作为PROM组,另选取同期住院的正常妊娠孕妇100例作为对照组,PROM组患者根据是否合并GBS感染分为GBS阳性组和GBS阴性组。比较PROM组和对照组的GBS阳性率,比较GBS阳性组和GBS阴性组早产、胎儿窘迫、新生儿窒息、新生儿肺炎、产褥感染的发生率及新生儿听力筛查的通过率。结果:PROM组的GBS阳性率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。GBS阳性组早产、胎儿窘迫、新生儿窒息、新生儿肺炎、产褥感染的发生率均明显高于GBS阴性组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05),GBS阳性组在初筛和复筛时听力筛查通过率均低于GBS阴性组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:孕妇生殖道GBS感染与PROM密切相关,并可增加不良妊娠结局发生的风险,在一定程度上影响了新生儿的听力功能,对母婴预后造成不良影响。     

羊水过多和过少与染色体异常关系的研究

目的：探讨产前筛查中孕妇羊水过多和羊水过少与胎儿染色体异常的关系。方法：对2003年1月～2005年6月前来中山大学附属第一医院胎儿医学中心被产前诊断的106例羊水量异常孕妇,在B超介导下行羊膜腔穿刺术和脐静脉穿刺术,对获得的羊水和脐血进行染色体核型分析。研究羊水过多和羊水过少与染色体异常的关系。结果：对106例进行统计,染色体异常所占比例为15．1％。羊水过多与羊水过少中染色体异常检出率分别为18．3％和4．2％。结论：适量的羊水对保护胎儿,促进其生长发育,有着举足轻重的作用。我们应对产前筛查中羊水量的异常现象高度重视,及时处理,以减少染色体异常胎儿的出生。     

数字PCR及其在现代医学分子诊断中的应用

数字PCR(digital PCR,dPCR)技术被认为是精确定量核酸分子的全新技术手段,因为具有较高的灵敏度和特异性等特点而得到迅速发展。数字PCR在临床上的多个领域展现出良好的应用前景,比如肿瘤液体活检、器官移植物损伤评估、无创产前筛查、病原微生物分子诊断以及二代测序文库质控和结果验证等。本文就数字PCR在上述领域中的应用研究及其进展进行综述。     

Prenatal diagnosis--principles of diagnostic procedures and genetic counseling

The frequency of inherited malformations as well as genetic disorders in newborns account for around 3-5%. These frequency is much higher in early stages of pregnancy, because serious malformations and genetic disorders usually lead to spontaneous abortion. Prenatal diagnosis allowed identification of malformations and/or some genetic syndromes in fetuses during the first trimester of pregnancy. Thereafter, taking into account the severity of the disorders the decision should be taken in regard of subsequent course of the pregnancy taking into account a possibilities of treatment, parent's acceptation of a handicapped child but also, in some cases the possibility of termination of the pregnancy. In prenatal testing, both screening and diagnostic procedures are included. Screening procedures such as first and second trimester biochemical and/or ultrasound screening, first trimester combined ultrasound/biochemical screening and integrated screening should be widely offered to pregnant women. However, interpretation of screening results requires awareness of both sensitivity and predictive value of these procedures. In prenatal diagnosis ultrasound/MRI searching as well as genetic procedures are offered to pregnant women. A variety of approaches for genetic prenatal analyses are now available, including preimplantation diagnosis, chorion villi sampling, amniocentesis, fetal blood sampling as well as promising experimental procedures (e.g. fetal cell and DNA isolation from maternal blood). An incredible progress in genetic methods opened new possibilities for valuable genetic diagnosis. Although karyotyping is widely accepted as golden standard, the discussion is ongoing throughout Europe concerning shifting to new genetic techniques which allow obtaining rapid results in prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidy (e.g. RAPID-FISH, MLPA, quantitative PCR).     

Psychosocial correlates of pregnant women's attitudes toward prenatal maternal serum screening and invasive diagnostic testing: beyond traditional risk status

This study examined whether psychosocial variables predict pregnant women's attitudes toward maternal serum screening and invasive diagnostic testing, beyond the influence of traditional obstetric risk status (based on advanced maternal age, history of genetic disorders, etc.). In a sample of 612 pregnant women (66.5% high risk, 33.5% low risk) we assessed responses to hypothetical scenarios of invasive testing following normal or abnormal maternal serum screening. We also assessed psychosocial variables stemming from the theory of planned behavior (e.g., knowledge, concern for fetus, attitudes toward termination, health locus of control). Overall, two thirds of the women would want serum screening. Follow-up invasive diagnostic testing would be sought by 37.2% of the women after a negative screening, and by 75.0% after a positive screening. As expected, traditional risk status predicted desire for screening and also invasive testing following either a negative or positive screen. Yet, controlling for risk status, many psychosocial variables predicted a women's interest in screening and in invasive testing: more knowledge about prenatal testing, concern about fetal health, willingness to terminate a pregnancy, and an internal or medical profession health locus of control. We conclude that psychosocial variables influence women's desire for screening or invasive testing beyond traditional risk status.     

A burden from birth? Non‐invasive prenatal testing and the stigmatization of people with disabilities

The notion of being a burden to others is mostly discussed in the context of care‐intensive diseases or end‐of‐life decisions. But the notion is also crucial in decision‐making at the beginning of life, namely regarding prenatal testing. Ever more sophisticated testing methods, especially non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), allow the detection of genetic traits in the unborn child that may cause disabilities. A positive result often influences the decision of the pregnant women towards a termination of the pregnancy. Thus, critics claim that these testing methods send a negative message to people with disabilities. At the core of this is what we call the burden assumption. This assumption claims that children with disabilities are necessarily a burden to others, especially to their parents and other family members. In this paper, we discuss what being a burden to others means in this context and how such an attitude can be avoided without restraining reproductive autonomy. A closer examination shows that the burden assumption is mostly based on misinformation and a false model of disability. Empirical studies as well as narrative evidence from parents who raise a child with disabilities show that the burden assumption is wrong. Raising a child with disabilities does not necessarily mean a decrease in the quality of life. We show how the burden assumption can be challenged through an advanced genetic counselling that combines empirical evidence with narratives from a first‐person perspective.     

Evaluation of non‐invasive prenatal testing to detect chromosomal aberrations in a Chinese cohort

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) to detect foetal copy number variations (CNVs). Next‐generation sequencing for detecting foetal copy number variations (CNVs) was performed on the collected samples from 161 pregnancies with ultrasound anomalies and negative NIPT results for aneuploidy. The performance of NIPT for detecting chromosome aberrations was calculated. The sensitivity and specificity of NIPT for detecting CNVs > 1 Mb were 83.33% and 99.34%; the PPV and negative predictive rate (NPV) were 90.91% and 98.68%. Non‐invasive prenatal testing can be performed to detect chromosomal aberrations in first trimester with high performance for CNVs, and occasional discordant cases are unavoidable.     

Prenatal diagnosis using fetal cells from the maternal circulation.

All current methods of fetal karyotyping are invasive and carry a definite, albeit small, procedure-related risk. Because of this and testing costs, only women older than 35 years who have a greater risk for fetal aneuploidy are currently offered prenatal testing. But this detects only 20% to 25% of fetuses with Down syndrome. It would be a tremendous advance to find a noninvasive technique for prenatal diagnosis that carries no procedure-related risk and could be offered to all pregnant women. We describe a possible technique for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis that aims to identify fetal cells in the peripheral maternal circulation and successfully garner them for prenatal testing. Early attempts at fetal karyotyping were hampered by inaccurate diagnostic methods and cumbersome cell-counting techniques. Today, improved capabilities of identifying and enriching for fetal cells, coupled with sensitive methods of analysis such as the polymerase chain reaction, bring renewed enthusiasm to this task. Many technical issues, as well as serious questions regarding the test''s utility, still exist, however, and must be explored and answered before the capture of fetal cells in the maternal circulation translates into reality for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis.     

产前经腹灰阶联合彩色血流超声多参数对胎盘植入性疾病的诊断效能研究

摘要 目的：探究产前经腹灰阶联合彩色血流超声多参数对胎盘植入性疾病的诊断效能。方法：2019年11月-2021年12月于我院收治的产前超声诊断为前置胎盘的孕妇共计62例,其中44例超声诊断合并了胎盘植入的孕妇。所有孕妇产前均进行经腹灰阶检查、经腹彩色超声检查和二者联合检查胎盘植入性疾病,通过分析胎盘植入性疾病筛查结果,评价产前超声经腹灰阶联合彩色血流超声多参数对胎盘植入性疾病的筛查效能。结果：（1）通过灰阶超声诊断检出胎盘植入的灵敏度为73.42 %,特异度为86.54 %;（2）通过彩色超声诊断检出胎盘植入的灵敏度为76.89%,特异度为89.07 %;（3）经腹灰阶联合彩色血流超声多参数诊断检出胎盘植入的灵敏度为87.79 %,特异度为90.36 %;（4）经腹灰阶检查、经腹彩色超声检查和二者联合检查对胎盘植入性疾病筛查阳性率分别为56.45 %、62.90 %和67.74 %,二者联合检查对产前胎盘植入性疾病筛查阳性率显著高于经腹灰阶检查和经腹彩色超声检查（P<0.05）。（5）二者联合检查的敏感度为72.26 %,特异度为90.54 %,阳性比为95.55 %,诊断比值比为78.89 %。结论：产前经腹灰阶联合彩色血流超声多参数对胎盘植入性疾病的诊断有较高的灵敏度和特异度,值得临床推广应用。     

Changing our perspective: Is there a government obligation to promote autonomy through the provision of public prenatal screening?

In many countries, prenatal testing for certain fetal abnormalities is offered via publicly funded screening programs. The concept of reproductive autonomy is regarded as providing a justificatory basis for many such programs. The purpose of this study is to re‐examine the normative basis of public prenatal screening for fetal abnormalities by changing our perspective from that of autonomy to obligation. After clarifying the understanding of autonomy adopted in the justification for public prenatal screening programs, we identify two problems concerning this justification: first, the extent to which the government is obliged to meet this demand is not evident; and, second, it is not clear whether the provision of public screening is the most appropriate way to promote autonomy. Next, to tackle these problems, we focus on Onora O’Neill’s argument of rights and obligations. Drawing on this argument, we show that, in addressing the problems above, it is important to change our normative perspective from rights or autonomy to obligation. Our argument will show that since the government does not have an incontrovertibly fundamental obligation to promote autonomy, this obligation needs to be constrained in terms of compatibility with other fundamental obligations. In addition, even if a government is obliged to promote autonomy to some degree, there could be more appropriate means to achieve it than providing public prenatal screening; therefore, it is not necessary for government obligations to extend to the provision of public prenatal screening.     

Kleihauer抗酸染色法标记母血中的胎儿有核红细胞

以18例孕7~25周的孕妇外周血为材料, 经Percoll不连续密度梯度离心初步富集胎儿有核红细胞。然后用Kleihauer抗酸染色法进行标记, 结果阳性胎儿有核红细胞的胞浆呈深红色, 而母亲的有核红细胞胞浆无色。显微操作法获取单个胎儿有核红细胞, 经全基因组扩增后, 产物进行性别鉴定及STR连锁分析检测, 验证有核红细胞的来源, 并完成9例杜氏肌营养不良(Duchenne muscular dystrophy,DMD)的无创性产前基因诊断。应用Kleihauer抗酸染色法标记胎儿有核红细胞, 它是一种快速、简单、直接的化学染色方法, 更易于推广到临床应用。     

胎盘特异性基因4 mRNA基因在孕妇外周血中的检测及临床价值

目的:应用实时荧光定量PCR(RT-PCR)技术对不同孕周孕妇外周血浆胎盘特异性基因4(PLAC4)m RNA基因进行检测,寻找唐氏综合征产前诊断的可靠生物学标志物,为无创性产前诊断提供新的突破口。方法:按入组标准随机选取健康育龄未妊娠女性5例,正常健康妊娠孕妇60例(早期妊娠20例、中期妊娠20例、晚期妊娠20例),唐氏筛查高危孕妇8例,正常分娩24 h女性5例。共收集外周血浆样本78例。应用RT-PCR技术,检测样本中的PLAC4 m RNA基因含量,并进行相对定量分析。结果:健康育龄未妊娠女性及正常分娩后24 h女性外周血浆中均无游离胎儿PLAC4 m RNA基因的存在;正常健康妊娠孕妇不同孕周标本均检测到PLAC4 m RNA基因,以早期妊娠作为对照,中期妊娠是早期妊娠的1.99倍,晚期妊娠是早期妊娠的3.73倍;唐氏筛查高危孕妇均检出PLAC4 m RNA基因,含量是早期妊娠的6.36倍。结论:PLAC4 m RNA基因有望成为唐氏综合征产前诊断的可靠性生物学标志物。