四联疗法与序贯疗法根除幽门螺杆菌疗效观察

目的:探讨四联疗法和序贯疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效和安全性。方法:将150例14C尿素呼气试验阳性的慢性胃炎患者随机分为A、B、C 3组各50例。A组(四联疗法)给予雷贝拉唑、枸橼酸铋钾、克拉霉素、阿莫西林治疗7 d;B组(序贯疗法)前5d给予雷贝拉唑、阿莫西林,后5d给予雷贝拉唑、克拉霉素、甲硝唑治疗;C组(标准三联疗法)给予雷贝拉唑、克拉霉素、阿莫西林治疗治疗7 d。疗程结束4周后行14C尿素呼气试验检测。结果:A组根除率为94%,B组根除率为90%,C组根除率68%。A组和B组优于C组(P<0.01);A组、B组无显著差异性(P>0.05)。三组均无严重不良反应。结论:四联疗法与序贯疗法H.pylori根除率优于标准三联疗法,四联疗法和序贯疗法疗效无明显差异性。     

四联疗法和序贯疗法治疗服用非甾体类消炎药人群幽门螺杆菌感染的临 床对照研究

目的:对比四联疗法和序贯疗法对根除服用非甾体类消炎药(NSAID)人群幽门螺杆菌(Hp),改善其消化道不良症状及促进消化性溃疡愈合的临床效果。方法:对有消化不良症状的服用非甾体类消炎药物患者行胃镜检查、快速尿激酶及13C呼气试验检查,将155例幽门螺杆菌阳性合并有慢性胃炎或消化性溃疡患者作为研究对象,随机分为两组,A组采用四联疗法,B组采用序贯疗法。A组予雷贝拉唑+克拉霉素+阿莫西林+枸橼酸铋钾治疗10天;B组前5天予雷贝拉唑+阿莫西林,后5天予雷贝拉唑+克拉霉素+甲硝唑。治疗结束后,予雷贝拉唑和胃黏膜保护剂治疗8周。停药4周后,复查胃镜、13C呼气试验,观察和比较两组Hp根除率、消化不良症状缓解率及溃疡愈合率。结果:A、B两组Hp根除率分别为(ITT分析:86.7%和81.9%;PP分析:87.8%和84.3%);症状缓解率为(81.9%对79.2%);胃溃疡愈合率为(68.8%对66.7%),十二指肠球部溃疡的愈合率为(68.2%对70.0%),两组患者间Hp根除率、症状缓解率及溃疡愈合率比较均未见明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。四联疗法组和序贯疗法组不良反应的发生率分别为4.9%和4.3%。两组比较无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:四联疗法和序贯疗法对长期服用非甾体类消炎药物人群的Hp根除疗效、消化不良症状的缓解及促进溃疡愈合的治疗作用均无明显差异。     

四联疗法与序贯疗法根除幽门螺杆菌疗效观察

目的：探讨四联疗法和序贯疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效和安全性。方法：将150例14C尿素呼气试验阳性的慢性胃炎患者随机分为A、B、C3组各50例。A组（四联疗法）给予雷贝拉唑、枸橼酸铋钾、克拉霉素、阿莫西林治疗7d;B组（序贯疗法）前5d给予雷贝拉唑、阿莫西林,后5d给予雷贝拉唑、克拉霉素、甲硝唑治疗;C组（标准三联疗法）给予雷贝拉唑、克拉霉素、阿莫西林治疗治疗7d。疗程结束4周后行14C尿素呼气试验检测。结果：A组根除率为94％,B组根除率为90％,c组根除率68％。A组和B组优于c组（P〈0．01）;A组、B组无显著差异性（P〉0．05）。三组均无严重不良反应。结论：四联疗法与序贯疗法H．pylori根除率优干标缝三联疗法．四联疗法和庠骨疗法疗效无．明昂差异性．     

含米诺环素和奥硝唑的四联疗法联合双歧杆菌乳杆菌三联活菌片根除幽门螺杆菌的效果

目的研究含米诺环素及奥硝唑的四联疗法的有效性和安全性,并分析双歧杆菌乳杆菌三联活菌片(金双歧)在幽门螺杆菌根除治疗中的效果,指导临床实践。方法回顾性分析2018年5月至2019年5月福建省立医院收治的101例幽门螺杆菌阳性患者,所有患者均采用艾司奥美拉唑+米诺环素+奥硝唑+铋剂四联方案,其中51例患者联合金双歧治疗,比较各类患者治疗效果及不良反应。通过~(13)C尿素呼气试验评估幽门螺杆菌根除情况。不良反应及临床症状缓解情况通过访谈进行评估。结果 101例患者幽门螺杆菌总根除率为94.06%(95%CI:87.01%～97.56%),共出现不良反应19例,不良反应率为18.81%(95%CI:11.98%～28.07%)。90.10%的患者依从性良好。联合和不联合金双歧的患者其幽门螺杆菌根除率差异无统计学意义(92.2%vs 96.0%,P=0.678 0),临床症状缓解情况差异也无统计学意义(P=0.444 0),但联合金双歧可减少治疗不良反应发生率(P=0.005 0)。结论含米诺环素和奥硝唑的四联疗法是根除幽门螺杆菌有效且耐受性良好的方案。补充金双歧不能提高患者根除率,但可以减少治疗时的不良反应。     

阿泰宁在根除幽门螺杆菌中的临床应用疗效

目的探讨阿泰宁（酪酸梭菌活菌胶囊）在根除幽门螺杆菌中的应用和临床疗效。方法将120例幽门螺杆菌阳性的慢性胃炎患者,随机分为观察组（58例）和对照组（62例）。对照组口服标准三联方（雷贝拉唑肠溶胶囊＋阿莫西林胶囊＋克拉霉素缓释片）进行治疗,观察组在口服三联方的同时序贯联用阿泰宁（即先服用三联方,间隔2~3 h后再服用阿泰宁）,疗程均为1周,观察两组患者用药后幽门螺杆菌根除率及不良反应发生率。结果 （1）幽门螺杆菌根除率：对照组为72.6%,观察组为91.4%,观察组明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;（2）不良反应发生率：对照组为38.7%;观察组为8.6%,观察组明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论在标准三联方的基础上加用阿泰宁能显著提高幽门螺杆菌根除率,并减少胃肠道不良反应,提高患者的依从性,值得临床推广。     

埃索美拉唑为基础的四联疗法对消化性溃疡患者幽门螺杆菌根除率、炎性因子及生活质量的影响

目的:探讨埃索美拉唑为基础的四联疗法对消化性溃疡(PU)患者幽门螺杆菌(Hp)根除率、炎性因子及生活质量的影响。方法:选取2016年3月～2018年11月间我院接收的117例PU患者,根据数表法将患者随机分为对照组(n=58)和研究组(n=59),对照组给予以奥美拉唑为基础的四联疗法治疗,研究组给予以埃索美拉唑为基础的四联疗法治疗,比较两组患者临床疗效、Hp根除率、炎性因子、生活质量及不良反应。结果:研究组治疗后总有效率为74.58%(44/59),高于对照组患者的53.45%(31/58)(P0.05)。两组患者治疗后白介素-6(IL-6)、超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)较治疗前降低,且研究组低于对照组(P0.05)。研究组的HP根除率高于对照组(P0.05)。两组患者治疗后临床症状、心理情感、社交及任务完成评分均较治疗前升高,且研究组高于对照组(P0.05)。两组不良反应发生率比较无统计学差异(P0.05)。结论:埃索美拉唑为基础的四联疗法治疗PU,可有效改善炎性因子水平、Hp根除率和生活质量,疗效确切,安全性好,临床应用价值较高。     

不同干预时机下复方嗜酸乳杆菌片联合四联疗法在根除幽门螺杆菌失败补救治疗中的应用

目的探讨不同干预时机下复方嗜酸乳杆菌片联合四联疗法在首次根除幽门螺杆菌(H. pylori)失败患者补救治疗中的作用。方法选择西安市第一医院消化内科90例经标准四联疗法根除H. pylori失败的患者为研究对象,随机分为研究组A(A组)、研究组B(B组)与对照组(C组),各30例。A组患者使用复方嗜酸乳杆菌片联合补救四联疗法治疗。B组患者在补救四联疗法结束后序贯使用复方嗜酸乳杆菌片2周。C组患者单独采用补救四联疗法治疗。比较3组患者临床症状、不良反应发生率及H. pylori根除率。结果A组、B组、C组患者总有效率分别为93.33%(28/30),90.00%(27/30),66.67%(20/30),差异有统计学意义(χ²=9.120,P=0.010)。A组、B组、C组患者总不良反应发生率分别为13.33%(4/30)、16.67%(5/30)、66.67%(20/30),差异有统计学意义(χ²=24.522,P<0.001)。A组、B组、C组患者H. pylori根除率分别为60.00%(18/30)、63.33%(19/30)、33.33%(10/30),差异有统计学意义(χ² =6.502,P=0.039)。A组与B组患者H. pylori根除率相比差异无统计学意义(χ²=0.071,P=0.791)。结论复方嗜酸乳杆菌片联合四联疗法可提高首次四联疗法根除H. pylori失败患者H. pylori根除率,改善患者临床症状,降低总体不良反应发生率,但不同干预时机下复方嗜酸乳杆菌片对H. pylori根除率无明显影响。     

枯草杆菌二联活菌肠溶胶囊与四联疗法治疗老年人幽门螺旋杆菌感染临床观察

目的观察枯草杆菌二联活菌肠溶胶囊(制剂)与传统四联疗法治疗老年人幽门螺杆菌感染的安全性及临床效果,寻找较为适合老年人的根除幽门螺杆菌的方案。方法对14C呼气试验阳性的老年(≥60岁)患者224例随机分为2组,观察组受试者每人口服雷贝拉唑钠肠溶胶囊20 mg(1次/d)、复方铝酸铋1.3 g(3次/d)、阿莫西林胶囊0.5 g(2次/d)、克拉霉素0.5 g(2次/d)和2 h后服用枯草杆菌二联活菌制剂2粒(3次/d),治疗2周;对照组受试者每人除不服用枯草杆菌二联活菌制剂外,与观察组服药相同,治疗2周。结果观察组有效率为7 8.90%(86/109),对照组有效率为81.25%(91/112),两组间差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.20,P>0.05)。治疗结果显示两种方案对根治老年人幽门螺杆菌感染均获得了良好的效果。在不良反应方面,观察组总不良反应率为20.54%;对照组总不良反应率为为49.11%,观察组的不良反应率显著低于对照组,其差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论实验所用两种方案治疗老年人幽门螺杆菌感染均有良好的效果,而枯草杆菌二联活菌制剂联合四联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌感染可以减少不良反应,提高治疗的安全性。     

黄连素四联方案补救治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的有效性和安全性

目的:探索黄连素四联方案用于幽门螺杆菌感染根除失败患者补救治疗的有效性及安全性。方法:将经四联方案初次根除治疗失败并自愿接受补救治疗的130例患者按纳入顺序,以1:1的比例分配治疗,随机接受14天黄连素四联(埃索美拉唑20mg+胶体果胶铋200 mg+阿莫西林1000 mg,2/d+黄连素300 mg 3/d)或四环素四联(埃索美拉唑20 mg+胶体果胶铋200 mg+四环素750 mg+呋喃唑酮100 mg,2/d)方案的治疗。所有患者均于治疗14天及治疗结束至少28天后随诊,详细记录患者症状及不良反应情况。治疗结束至少28天后进行13C尿素呼气试验来判断幽门螺杆菌根除情况。结果:65例接受黄连素四联根除治疗,65例接受四环素四联方案治疗。两组分别有6例和4例患者因不良反应服药依从性小于80%,其余患者均完成了14天的治疗。黄连素组和四环素组的幽门螺杆菌根除率ITT分析分别为76.9%(50/65)和81.5%(53/65),P=0.520;PP分析分别为84.7%(50/59)和86.9%(53/61),P=0.739。黄连素组和四环素组不良事件总体发生率分别为49.2%和41.5%,P=0.370。结论:黄连素四联疗法用于幽门螺杆菌感染的二次根除治疗,根除率较高,未明显增加不良事件发生率,是有效及安全的补救治疗方案。     

四联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性胃溃疡的疗效观察

目的:观察埃索美拉唑联合瑞巴派特、阿莫西林、克拉霉素治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性胃溃疡临床疗效。方法:60例确诊的Hp阳性胃溃疡患者随机分为对照组(30例)和治疗组(30例),其中对照组患者给予奥美拉唑+阿莫西林+克拉霉素三联法治疗,实验组给予埃索美拉唑+瑞巴派特+阿莫西林+克拉霉素四联法治疗。观察比较两组患者临床症状缓解情况,溃疡愈合率、Hp根除率及溃疡复发率。结果:①经过治疗,所有患者腹痛、腹胀、反酸、暧气等临床症状积分均显著降低(P<0.01),且治疗组下降程度大于对照组,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。②治疗组患者痊愈率为60.00%、总有效率为93.33%,明显高于对照组痊愈率(43.33%)和总有效率(80.00%),两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。③治疗组S2期获得率、溃疡愈合率和Hp根除率分别为93.33%、96.67%和93.33%,显著高于对照组60.00%的S2期获得率、70.00%的愈合率和83.33%的根除率(P<0.01或0.05)。④随访1年后,治疗组患者溃疡复发率为11.54%,与对照组32.00%的复发率比较差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论:四联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性胃溃疡可有效缓解患者临床症状,提高溃疡愈合质量,根除Hp感染,减少复发,效果优于三联疗法。     

不同剂量埃索美拉唑三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌中的疗效观察

目的:研究不同剂量埃索美拉唑的三联疗法根治幽门螺杆菌的临床疗效。方法:选取2012年12月到2014年12月我院收治的幽门螺杆菌阳性胃炎患者100例,按照随机数字表法将患者分为高剂量组(n=50)和低剂量组(n=50),低剂量组给予阿莫西林(1 g/次)+克拉霉素(0.5 g/次)+埃索美拉唑(20 mg/次)治疗,而高剂量组埃索美拉唑改为40 mg/次,疗程均1个月。比较两组幽门螺杆菌清除率,及治疗前后发生反酸、上腹痛和腹胀的临床症状评分以及治疗后不良反应发生情况。结果:高剂量组患者的幽门螺杆菌清除率为92.0%,显著高于低剂量组的70.0%(P0.05);治疗后两组临床症状评分均显著低于治疗前(P0.05),且高剂量组显著低于低剂量组(P0.05);两组不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:高剂量较低剂量埃索美拉唑三联疗法能更有效根除幽门螺杆菌,改善患者的临床症状,且不会增加不良反应,值得在临床上借鉴。     

Failure of sequential therapy to eradicate Helicobacter pylori in previously treated subjects

BACKGROUND: Recently, studies in adults and subsequently in children have demonstrated a very high success rate for sequential therapy as a primary therapy when compared to traditional therapy regimens. METHODs: We report our experience with a sequential therapy regimen for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in five infected children and a young adult, whose conventional therapy regimens had been unsuccessful. RESULTS: Five patients failed the sequential therapy. All of them experienced between two and four failures of traditional therapy prior to the sequential treatment protocol. The only patient who succeeded on the sequential therapy had just one previous failure. All of our patients who had failed sequential therapy achieved eradication of the bacteria with quadruple therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In view of our disappointing results, sequential therapy is unsuccessful as a therapy for children and young adults who have failed previous treatment regimens. At the present time, quadruple therapy is indicated for this group. Well-designed placebo-controlled trials are indicated to further characterize this group of patients.     

酪酸梭菌活菌胶囊联合标准四联疗法 清除幽门螺杆菌感染的临床研究

目的评估酪酸梭菌活菌胶囊(阿泰宁)联合标准四联疗法清除幽门螺杆菌的临床疗效。方法收集2017年1月至2018年1月就诊于甘肃省人民医院消化科门诊,经胃镜及尿素-14 C呼气试验检查诊断为幽门螺杆菌感染的慢性胃炎患者220例为研究对象并随机分为两组。其中对照组患者给予标准四联疗法,疗程2周。观察组患者在标准四联疗法基础上加用酪酸梭菌活菌胶囊,疗程2周。停药1个月后复查尿素-14 C呼气试验,分析患者临床疗效和不良反应发生率。结果 (1)观察组患者幽门螺旋杆菌清除率(88.18%)明显高于对照组(76.36%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。(2)观察组的不良反应发生率(8.18%)低于对照组(26.37%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论酪酸梭菌活菌胶囊联合标准四联疗法清除幽门螺杆菌的疗效显著,值得临床推广。     

A modified bismuth-containing quadruple therapy including a short course of furazolidone for Helicobacter pylori eradication after sequential therapy failure

Background: Helicobacter pylori eradication has still remained a challenge, especially in case of failure to novel treatments. Therefore, we designed a study to evaluate the effects of a modified bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy including a short course of furazolidone on a group of patients whose sequential therapy had been unsuccessful. Materials and Methods: Thirty‐six H. pylori‐positive patients who had previously failed a clarithromycin‐containing sequential therapy enrolled the study. They received pantoprazole (40 mg‐bid), amoxicillin (1 g‐bid), and bismuth subcitrate (240 mg‐bid) for 2 weeks and furazolidone (200 mg‐bid) just during the first week. Eight weeks after treatment, H. pylori eradication was reassessed using C14‐urea breath test. Results: Thirty five patients completed the study. H. pylori eradication rates were 80.6% (95% CI = 67.6–93.5) and 82.9% (95% CI = 70.6–95.2) according to intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analyses, respectively. All patients had excellent compliance to treatment, and no one interrupted therapy owing to adverse effects. Conclusion: Regarding the eradication rate (>80%), low price, and very low adverse effects, a 2‐week bismuth‐containing quadruple regimen including a short course of furazolidone can be an encouraging regimen for second‐line H. pylori eradication in case of sequential therapy failure. Possibly, it can be improved by alterations in dose, dosing intervals, and/or duration.     

Bismuth-Containing Quadruple Therapy as Second-Line Treatment for Helicobacter pylori Infection: Effect of Treatment Duration and Antibiotic Resistance on the Eradication Rate in Korea

Background:  The eradication rate of first-line Helicobacter pylori treatment is only 70–85% and has been decreasing due to the increase in antibiotic resistance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of bismuth-containing quadruple therapy as second-line treatment for H. pylori infection based on treatment duration.
Methods:  We prospectively enrolled 227 patients that were found to have persistent H. pylori infection after first-line proton-pump inhibitor-clarithromycin-amoxicillin triple therapy. Patients were randomized to 1-week (112 patients) and 2-week (115 patients) quadruple therapy with tripotassium dicitrate bismuthate 300 mg q.i.d., meteronidazole 500 mg t.i.d., and tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d. and esomeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. The eradication rate, drug compliance, and adverse events were compared based on treatment duration.
Results:  The eradication rates were 72/112 (64.3%, 95% CI: 0.504–0.830) and 71/92 (77.2%, 0.440–0.749) with 1-week group, and 95/115 (82.6%, 1.165–2.449) an 88/94 (93.6%, 1.213–5.113) with 2-week group by intention-to-treat therapy ( p  = .002) and per-protocol analysis ( p  = .001), respectively. The adverse events increased as the treatment durations increased from 7 to 14 days (20.0 and 42.5%, respectively, p  < .001). However, there was no significant difference in the patient compliance or the rate of major adverse events between the 1- and 2-week groups (6.3 and 12.5%, respectively, p  = .133).
Conclusion:  Two-week bismuth-containing quadruple therapy was more effective than the 1-week treatment, and should be considered for second-line treatment in Korea.     

Effectiveness and safety of repeated quadruple therapy in Helicobacter pylori infection after failure of second-line quadruple therapy: repeated quadruple therapy as a third-line therapy

Backgrounds: Quadruple therapy using a proton‐pump inhibitor, bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline is a standard second‐line therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection, achieving an eradication rate of about 80% in Korea. A standard third‐line therapy is not currently established, although various protocols have been proposed. We performed this study to evaluate the effectiveness of a retrial with quadruple therapy before starting a third‐line treatment with new drugs. Materials and Methods: In 80 of 746 patients treated with a second‐line quadruple therapy at the Korea University Ansan Hospital between January 2002 and September 2010, treatment for H. pylori had failed, and 45 of these patients were eligible for this study. Eradication of H. pylori was assessed by repeated endoscopy or by the ¹³C‐urea breath test at least 4 weeks after therapy. The patients with treatment failure were treated again with quadruple regimen for 2 weeks and reevaluated for treatment effectiveness and safety. Results: The eradication rate with second‐line quadruple therapy was 86.9%. Of the 80 patients who failed treatment for H. pylori with the initial second‐line quadruple therapy, 64 patients were treated again with the same regimen. Of the 45 retreated patients in this study, three patients were lost to follow‐up and two complied poorly with medication. The eradication rate in the 40 patients retreated was 75.0% at per‐protocol analysis. Seventeen patients experienced mild adverse events. Conclusions: A retrial of quadruple therapy before use of a third‐line therapy may be safe and effective for patients who fail to respond to second‐line quadruple therapy.     

Meta-analysis: Four-Drug, Three-Antibiotic, Non-bismuth-Containing "Concomitant Therapy" Versus Triple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication

Background: Low success rates with triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infections have prompted search for alternatives. In one, a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) and amoxicillin was followed by the PPI plus clarithromycin and a nitroimidazole (sequential therapy); in another, these four drugs were given concomitantly (concomitant therapy).
Aim: To compare concomitant therapy with standard triple therapy for H. pylori infection.
Methods: By searching PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and abstracts of major gastrointestinal meeting, two independent reviewers systemically identified randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing concomitant quadruple to standard triple therapies as well as studies reporting eradication rates of concomitant quadruple therapy in treatment of H. pylori . Pooled eradication rates and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, and univariable metaregression analysis for all extracted variables was conducted.
Results: We identified nine studies (10 treatment arms) including five qualifying RCTs (576 subjects) comparing concomitant (293 subjects, duration 3 to 5 days) and triple therapy (283 subjects, duration 5 to 10 days) and four other studies evaluating concomitant therapy (478 subjects, duration 3 to 7 days). Pooled estimates of the five RCTs showed superiority of concomitant therapy over triple therapy; with intention-to-treat) pooled OR of 2.86 (95% CI: 1.73–4.73) and per-protocol (PP) pooled OR of 3.52 (95% CI: 1.95–6.38). Considering all 10 treatment arms, the ITT eradication rate was 89.7% (95% CI: 86.8–92.1%) and PP was 92.9% (95% CI: 90.2–94.8%).
Conclusion: Concomitant therapy appears to be an effective alternative to triple therapy and is less complex than sequential therapy.