四联疗法与序贯疗法根除幽门螺杆菌疗效观察

目的:探讨四联疗法和序贯疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效和安全性。方法:将150例14C尿素呼气试验阳性的慢性胃炎患者随机分为A、B、C 3组各50例。A组(四联疗法)给予雷贝拉唑、枸橼酸铋钾、克拉霉素、阿莫西林治疗7 d;B组(序贯疗法)前5d给予雷贝拉唑、阿莫西林,后5d给予雷贝拉唑、克拉霉素、甲硝唑治疗;C组(标准三联疗法)给予雷贝拉唑、克拉霉素、阿莫西林治疗治疗7 d。疗程结束4周后行14C尿素呼气试验检测。结果:A组根除率为94%,B组根除率为90%,C组根除率68%。A组和B组优于C组(P<0.01);A组、B组无显著差异性(P>0.05)。三组均无严重不良反应。结论:四联疗法与序贯疗法H.pylori根除率优于标准三联疗法,四联疗法和序贯疗法疗效无明显差异性。     

四联疗法和序贯疗法治疗服用非甾体类消炎药人群幽门螺杆菌感染的临 床对照研究

目的:对比四联疗法和序贯疗法对根除服用非甾体类消炎药(NSAID)人群幽门螺杆菌(Hp),改善其消化道不良症状及促进消化性溃疡愈合的临床效果。方法:对有消化不良症状的服用非甾体类消炎药物患者行胃镜检查、快速尿激酶及13C呼气试验检查,将155例幽门螺杆菌阳性合并有慢性胃炎或消化性溃疡患者作为研究对象,随机分为两组,A组采用四联疗法,B组采用序贯疗法。A组予雷贝拉唑+克拉霉素+阿莫西林+枸橼酸铋钾治疗10天;B组前5天予雷贝拉唑+阿莫西林,后5天予雷贝拉唑+克拉霉素+甲硝唑。治疗结束后,予雷贝拉唑和胃黏膜保护剂治疗8周。停药4周后,复查胃镜、13C呼气试验,观察和比较两组Hp根除率、消化不良症状缓解率及溃疡愈合率。结果:A、B两组Hp根除率分别为(ITT分析:86.7%和81.9%;PP分析:87.8%和84.3%);症状缓解率为(81.9%对79.2%);胃溃疡愈合率为(68.8%对66.7%),十二指肠球部溃疡的愈合率为(68.2%对70.0%),两组患者间Hp根除率、症状缓解率及溃疡愈合率比较均未见明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。四联疗法组和序贯疗法组不良反应的发生率分别为4.9%和4.3%。两组比较无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:四联疗法和序贯疗法对长期服用非甾体类消炎药物人群的Hp根除疗效、消化不良症状的缓解及促进溃疡愈合的治疗作用均无明显差异。     

含益生菌四联疗法根治顽固性幽门螺杆菌感染的疗效观察

目的 探讨含益生菌四联疗法根治顽固性幽门螺杆菌感染(H.pylori)的疗效.方法 经标准三联疗法根治失败的顽固性幽门螺杆菌感染患者180例,随机分为6组:A组(含双歧杆菌乳杆菌三联活菌片四联疗法):雷贝拉唑+阿莫西林+克拉霉素+双歧杆菌乳杆菌三联活菌片;B组(伴同疗法):雷贝拉唑+阿莫西林+克拉霉素+呋喃唑酮;C组(标准四联疗法):雷贝拉唑+阿莫西林+克拉霉素+胶体果胶铋.疗程均为7d.同样分组方案A1组、B1组、C1组,疗程14d.治疗前后查肝肾功及三大常规,观察药物不良反应.1个月后复查胃镜并作快速尿素酶实验及14C呼吸实验(14C-UBT),观察H.pylori根除情况.结果 含双歧杆菌乳杆菌三联活菌片四联疗法根除率7d为76.7％,与其他两组比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),无任何不良反应发生;14 d为90.0％,与其他两组比较差异也无统计学意义(P＞0.05),各组均优于7天组(P ＜0.05);14天组不良反应发生率为6.67％,7天及14天组不良反应均低于其他相应各组.结论 含双歧杆菌乳杆菌三联活菌片四联疗法根治顽固性幽门螺杆菌感染的疗效与标准四联及伴同疗法相当,但不良反应较少,可以值得推广.     

以左氧氟沙星为基础的三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效分析

目的：本研究的目的是评估以左氧氟沙星为基础的三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效分析。方法：112例通过快速尿素酶试验和13C．尿素呼气试验证实感染了幽门螺杆菌的非溃疡性消化不良的患者入组本实验,患者被随机分为7d组（54例）和14d组（58例）,接受包括雷贝拉唑Oomgb-i．d．）加左氧氟沙星（500mgq．d．）和阿莫西林（1000mgb．i．d．）的治疗,并进行6周的随访,治疗结束至少4周后通过13C．尿素呼气试验确定根除率。结果：幽门螺杆菌总的根除率为83．9％（ITT）和88．7％（PP）。7d组51名患者完成了治疗。其根除率为75．9％（ITT）、80．4％（PP）,而14d组的根除率达到91．4％（ITT）、96．4％（PP）,P〈0．05。结论：包含雷贝拉唑、左氧氟沙星和阿莫西林的三联疗法对于根除幽门螺杆菌是有效的,但相同方案的14d疗法疗效明显优于7d疗法。     

金双歧联合含左氧氟沙星和铋剂的四联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效观察

目的比较金双歧联合含左氧氟沙星和铋剂四联疗法根除幽门螺旋杆菌(Helicobacter pylori,H.pylori)的疗效。方法纳入180例H.pylori感染患者,随机分为3组:A组给予雷贝拉唑、阿莫西林、克拉霉素、胶体果胶铋治疗;B组给予雷贝拉唑、阿莫西林、左氧氟沙星、胶体果胶铋治疗;C组给予雷贝拉唑、阿莫西林、左氧氟沙星、胶体果胶铋、金双歧治疗。疗程10d。观察各组H.pylori根除率、药物不良反应发生率。结果H.pylori根除率B组(83.3%)和C组(90.0%)高于A组(70.0%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05);C组(90.0%)高于B组(83.3%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。不良反应发生率A组(31.7%)和B组(30.0%)高于C组(10.0%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05);A组(31.7%)高于B组(30.0%),但差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论金双歧联合含铋剂四联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌疗效肯定,不良反应小,值得临床推广。     

铋剂四联疗法联合双岐三联活菌对Hp感染患者的疗效

为了对比分析2种含铋剂四联疗法联合双岐三联活菌胶囊分别对幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacter pylori,Hp)感染患者疗效的影响。本研究随机选取200例就诊的Hp感染患者,将患者随机分为4组,每组50例。A组(埃索美拉唑,克拉霉素,阿莫西林,枸橼酸铋钾胶囊)、B组(埃索美拉唑,呋喃唑酮,阿莫西林,枸橼酸铋钾胶囊)、C组(埃索美拉唑,克拉霉素,阿莫西林,枸橼酸铋钾胶囊,双歧杆菌三联活菌胶囊)和D组(埃索美拉唑,呋喃唑酮,阿莫西林,枸橼酸铋钾胶囊和双歧杆菌三联活菌胶囊)。分析对比四组患者的临床缓解疗效、幽门螺旋杆菌根除效率、不良反应、复发情况及成本效果比。研究表明:2种含铋剂四联疗法联合双岐三联活菌胶囊对幽门螺杆菌感染患者的临床缓解症状、幽门螺杆菌根除率效果、不良反应发生率和复发情况效果优于含铋剂四联疗法,但是D组成本效果比更具有经济学优势。埃索美拉唑、呋喃唑酮、阿莫西林、枸橼酸铋钾胶囊和双歧杆菌三联活菌胶囊联合可促进Hp患者恢复,根除率高,降低不良反应和复发率,且具有经济学优势,值得推广应用。     

以左氧氟沙星为基础的三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效分析

目的:本研究的目的是评估以左氧氟沙星为基础的三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效分析。方法:112例通过快速尿素酶试验和13C-尿素呼气试验证实感染了幽门螺杆菌的非溃疡性消化不良的患者入组本实验,患者被随机分为7d组(54例)和14d组(58例),接受包括雷贝拉唑(10mgb.i.d.)加左氧氟沙星(500mgq.d.)和阿莫西林(1000mgb.i.d.)的治疗,并进行6周的随访,治疗结束至少4周后通过13C-尿素呼气试验确定根除率。结果:幽门螺杆菌总的根除率为83.9%(ITT)和88.7%(PP)。7d组51名患者完成了治疗,其根除率为75.9%(ITT)、80.4%(PP),而14d组的根除率达到91.4%(ITT)、96.4%(PP),P<0.05。结论:包含雷贝拉唑、左氧氟沙星和阿莫西林的三联疗法对于根除幽门螺杆菌是有效的,但相同方案的14d疗法疗效明显优于7d疗法。     

亿活联合标准三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的临床疗效

目的探讨布拉氏酵母菌散(亿活)联合标准三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacter pylori)的疗效。方法收集内镜下行快速尿素酶试验及14 C呼气试验(14 C-UBT)均为阳性的慢性非萎缩性胃炎患者200例。随机分为四组(各50例):A组给予标准三联疗法(埃索美拉唑肠溶片20mg Bid+阿莫西林1.0g Bid+呋喃唑酮0.1g Bid)7d;B组先给予标准三联疗法7d,再口服亿活(0.5g Bid)14d;C组先口服亿活14d,再给予标准三联疗法7d;D组同时给予标准三联疗法及亿活7d,再继续口服亿活7d。各组患者均疗程结束后4周复查14 C-UBT。正态分布的计量资料行t检验,计数资料采用卡方检验进行比较。结果共185例患者完成随访。B、C、D组患者H.pylori根除率及临床症状缓解率均高于A组,其不良反应发生率均低于A组,B、C组患者具有相同的临床疗效,D组患者幽门螺杆菌的根除率及临床症状缓解率均高于B、C组,其不良反应发生率均低于B、C组,但B、C、D三组患者间差异无统计学意义。结论亿活不同方式联合标准三联疗法可提高慢性非萎缩性胃炎患者H.pylori的根除率,其中亿活与标准三联同时服用(D组)既可以快速重建胃肠道微生态环境,同时可以抑制幽门螺杆菌的生长,总疗程比B、C组短,患者依从性好,因此最具有临床价值。     

四联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性胃溃疡的疗效观察

目的：观察埃索美拉唑联合瑞巴派特、阿莫西林、克拉霉素治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性胃溃疡临床疗效。方法：60例确诊的Hp阳性胃溃疡患者随机分为对照组（30例）和治疗组（30例）,其中对照组患者给予奥美拉唑＋阿莫西林＋克拉霉素三联法治疗,实验组给予埃索美拉唑＋瑞巴派特＋阿莫西林＋克拉霉素四联法治疗。观察比较两组患者临床症状缓解情况,溃疡愈合率、Hp根除率及溃疡复发率。结果：①经过治疗,所有患者腹痛、腹胀、反酸、暧气等临床症状积分均显著降低（P〈0.01）,且治疗组下降程度大于对照组,两组间差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。②治疗组患者痊愈率为60.00%、总有效率为93.33%,明显高于对照组痊愈率（43.33%）和总有效率（80.00%）,两组间差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。③治疗组S2期获得率、溃疡愈合率和Hp根除率分别为93.33%、96.67%和93.33%,显著高于对照组60.00%的S2期获得率、70.00%的愈合率和83.33%的根除率（P〈0.01或0.05）。④随访1年后,治疗组患者溃疡复发率为11.54%,与对照组32.00%的复发率比较差异有显著性（P〈0.05）。结论：四联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性胃溃疡可有效缓解患者临床症状,提高溃疡愈合质量,根除Hp感染,减少复发,效果优于三联疗法。     

雷贝拉唑三联疗法治疗胃溃疡100例临床疗效治疗

目的:观察雷贝拉唑联用克拉霉素、阿莫西林胶囊治疗良性溃疡疗效.方法:100例良性溃疡病人随机分成治疗组和对照组,治疗组采用雷贝拉唑+克拉霉素+阿莫西林治疗,对照组采用照组用奥美拉唑+克拉霉素+阿莫西林三联疗法,4周后复查胃镜、检测Hp并复查血、尿常规及肝肾功能.结果:治疗组有效率为94％,对照组有效率为80％,两者有显著性差异(P＜0.05);治疗组Hp转阴率为88％,显著高于对照组的转阴率72％(P＜0.05).结论:雷贝拉唑三联疗法治疗胃溃疡疗效高,无明显毒副作用,值得临床推广应用.     

Addition of metronidazole to rabeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection provides an excellent cure rate with five-day therapy

Background. New triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori based on a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) provides a cure rate of approximately 90% with few adverse effects. Recently, a PPI-based quadruple therapy, which consists of a PPI plus bismuth-based triple therapy for 7 days, has been studied, and a sufficient eradication rate has been achieved. However, a shorter duration results in improved compliance. In this study, newly developed short-term, simple twice-daily quadruple therapy consisting of rabeprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole (RACM) was compared with a PPI-based triple-therapy regimen for eradication of H. pylori.
Patients and Methods. This study was designed as a randomized open, prospective single-center study. Of a total of 105 H. pylori –positive patients, 55 received the RACM regimen for 5 days (rabeprazole, 10 mg bid; amoxicillin, 750 mg bid; clarithromycin, 200 mg bid; and metronidazole, 250 mg bid), and 50 received the RAC regimen for 5 days (rabeprazole, 10 mg bid; amoxicillin, 750 mg bid; and clarithromycin, 200 mg bid). Cure of the infection was assessed by HpSA ( H. pylori stool antigen immunoassay) 1 month after completion of therapy.
Results. The rates of eradication of H. pylori by RACM versus RAC were 94.5% (95% CI, 85–99) versus 80.0% (95% CI, 66–90) by intention-to-treat analysis; 98.1% (95% CI, 90–100) versus 87.0% (95% CI, 74–95) by all-patients-treated analysis; and 98.1% (95% CI, 90–100) versus 86.7% (95% CI, 73–95) by per-protocol analysis. No major adverse effects were reported, and 98.0% of patients reported complete compliance.
Conclusions. The simple twice-daily and short-term quadruple regimen for only 5 days provided an excellent eradication rate. Compliance with the regimen was high, and serious adverse effects were few. Therefore, the RACM regimen can be considered as safe and effective.     

以雷贝拉唑、左氧氟沙星为基础的三联补救疗法的临床观察

目的:观察以雷贝拉唑、左氧氟沙星为基础的三联疗法对幽门螺杆菌根除失败的补救疗法的临床疗效.方法:幽门螺杆菌根除失败的患者50例,予雷贝拉唑20mg,阿莫西林1.0,一天两次;左氧氟沙星0.5,一天一次;口服一周.停药1个月后行13C呼气试验检测来判断幽门螺杆菌根除率.结果:49例完成了整个研究过程,意向处理分析(ITT)根除率为82.00％,完成治疗分析(PP)根除率为83.67％,总的副作用发生率为12.00％,症状缓解率95.92％.结论:以雷贝拉唑、左氧氟沙星为基础的短程三联疗法对根治失败的幽门螺旋杆菌感染患者是一种安全、有效的治疗方案.     

Impact of Quadruple Regimen of Clarithromycin Added to Metronidazole-Containing Triple Therapy Against Helicobacter pylori Infection Following Clarithromycin-Containing Triple-Therapy Failure

Background: The establishment of an optimal second-line regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection is required. Although quadruple therapy should overcome resistance to either clarithromycin or metronidazole, the effects of a quadruple regimen in second-line therapy are unknown. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of triple therapy composed of proton pump inhibitor/amoxicillin plus metronidazole with the combined additive effects of clarithromycin as a second-line quadruple therapy against H. pylori infection.
Materials and Methods: Participants were 104 patients in whom first-line therapy containing proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin failed. Before starting second-line therapy, patients underwent endoscopy to obtain H. pylori strain for antibiotic susceptibility tests. Patients were randomized to receive rabeprazole (10 mg), amoxicillin (750 mg), and metronidazole (250 mg), either with clarithromycin (200 mg; RAMC group) or without (RAM group); all treatments were administered twice daily for 7 days. H. pylori eradication was confirmed by ¹³C-urea breath tests performed 2 to 3 months post-therapy.
Results: As shown by intention-to-treat/per-protocol analyses, the cure rates for H. pylori infection were 88.5%/93.9% and 82.7%/84.3% for the RAMC and RAM groups. Although the study probably had an insufficient power to show a significant difference between the cure rates of the two regimens, the eradication rates showed a clear trend in favor of the RAMC group. There were no severe side-effects in any group.
Conclusions: In Japan, the RAMC regimen is thought to be a promising alternative strategy for second-line eradication of H. pylori infection.     

A comparison between sequential therapy and a modified bismuth-based quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Iran: a randomized clinical trial

Background: Sequential regimens have been recently reported to be superior to the standard triple therapies in Helicobacter pylori eradication, but most of these studies were performed in Europe and data from developing countries are lacking. So we designed a study to compare a sequential regimen with a bismuth‐based quadruple therapy that contains a short course of furazolidone, in Iran. Methods: Two hundred and ninety‐six patients with duodenal ulcer and naïve H. pylori infection were randomized into two groups: 148 patients received (PAB‐F) pantoprazole (40 mg‐bid), amoxicillin (1 g‐bid), and bismuth subcitrate (240 mg‐bid) for 2 weeks and furazolidone (200 mg‐bid) just during the first week. And 148 patients received (PA‐CT) pantoprazole (40 mg‐bid) for 10 days, amoxicillin (1 g‐bid) for the first 5 days, and clarithromycin (500 mg‐bid) plus tinidazole (500 mg‐bid) just during the second 5 days. C¹⁴‐urea breath test was performed 8 weeks after the treatment. Results: Two hundred and sixty‐one patients completed the study (137 patients in the PA‐CT and 124 in the PAB‐F group). The results were not statistically different between the two groups in the eradication rates and the severity of side effects. The intention to treat eradication rate was 80.4% in the PAB‐F group and 83.7% in the PA‐CT group. Per‐protocol eradication rates were 88.7% and 89.1%, respectively. Conclusion: Because the two regimens showed acceptable and similar abilities in H. pylori eradication and because of much higher cost of clarithromycin in Iran, the furazolidone containing regimen seems to be superior. Further modifications of sequential therapies are needed to make them ideal regimens in developing countries.     

Open, randomized multicenter comparative trial of rabeprazole, ofloxacin and amoxicillin therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: 7 vs. 14 day treatment

BACKGROUND: Because of the increasing resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole, two of the antibiotics used for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori, new therapeutic alternatives are needed. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of a randomized, comparative trial of 7 vs. 14-day triple treatment with rabeprazole, ofloxacin and amoxicillin for H. pylori eradication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present authors studied 76 dyspeptic patients infected with H. pylori diagnosed by both histology and a rapid urease test. Patients were randomized to receive rabeprazole (20 mg b.i.d.), plus ofloxacin (400 mg b.i.d.) and amoxicillin (1000 mg b.i.d.) for 7 days (group 1) vs. 14 days (group 2) and were followed by 6 weeks. Eradication was assessed 4 weeks after completing the course of study treatment by the (14)C-urea breath test. Per protocol and intention-to-treat eradication rates were determined. RESULTS: For the intention to treat analysis, the eradication rate was 62.2% for group 1 and 92.3% for group 2 (p =.004). For the per protocol analysis, eradication rate for group 1 was 63.9% and for group 2 was 97.3% (p =.001). CONCLUSIONS: Triple therapy with rabeprazole, amoxicillin and ofloxacin by 14 days was efficient for H. pylori eradication and therefore deserves further study. The same regimen prescribed for 7 days had a significantly lower and unacceptable cure rate and should not be used.     

Nonbismuth quadruple (concomitant) therapy: empirical and tailored efficacy versus standard triple therapy for clarithromycin-susceptible Helicobacter pylori and versus sequential therapy for clarithromycin-resistant strains

Background:  Using quadruple clarithromycin‐containing regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication is controversial with high rates of macrolide resistance. Aim:  To evaluate antibiotic resistance rates and the efficacy of empirical and tailored nonbismuth quadruple (concomitant) therapy in a setting with cure rates <80% for triple and sequential therapies. Methods:  209 consecutive naive H. pylori‐positive patients without susceptibility testing were empirically treated with 10‐day concomitant therapy (proton pump inhibitors (PPI), amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg; all drugs b.i.d.). Simultaneously, 89 patients with positive H. pylori culture were randomized to receive triple versus concomitant therapy for clarithromycin‐susceptible H. pylori, and sequential versus concomitant therapy for clarithromycin‐resistant strains. Eradication was confirmed with ¹³C‐urea breath test or histology 8 weeks after completion of treatment. Results:  Per‐protocol (PP) and intention‐to‐treat eradication rates after empirical concomitant therapy without susceptibility testing were 89% (95%CI:84–93%) and 87% (83–92%). Antibiotic resistance rates were: clarithromycin, 20%; metronidazole, 34%; and both clarithromycin and metronidazole, 10%. Regarding clarithromycin‐susceptible H. pylori, concomitant therapy was significantly better than triple therapy by per protocol [92% (82–100%) vs 74% (58–91%), p = 0.05] and by intention to treat [92% (82–100%) vs 70% (57–90%), p = 0.02]. As for antibiotic‐resistant strains, eradication rates for concomitant and sequential therapies were 100% (5/5) vs 75% (3/4), for clarithromycin‐resistant/metronidazole‐susceptible strains and 75% (3/4) vs 60% (3/5) for dual‐resistant strains. Conclusions:  Empirical 10‐day concomitant therapy achieves good eradication rates, close to 90%, in settings with multiresistant H. pylori strains. Tailored concomitant therapy is significantly superior to triple therapy for clarithromycin‐susceptible H. pylori and at least as effective as sequential therapy for resistant strains.     

Impact of furazolidone-based quadruple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori after previous treatment failures

Background. One week of quadruple therapy including metronidazole is recommended for Helicobacter pylori treatment failures after first line therapy regardless of resistance status. This study investigated whether a quadruple regimen containing furazolidone could be effective as a third‐line (salvage) therapy. Methods. All patients with previous H. pylori treatment failure after a clarithromycin‐metronidazole ± amoxicillin combination plus acid suppression were given lansoprazole 30 mg twice a day (bid), tripotassiumdicitratobismuthate 240 mg bid, tetracycline 1 g bid, metronidazole 400 mg (PPI‐B‐T‐M) three times a day (tid) for 1 week. In the case of treatment failure with this second‐line therapy, the same regimen was applied for 1 week except for using furazolidone 200 mg bid (PPI‐B‐T‐F) instead of metronidazole (sequential study design). Results. Eighteen consecutive patients were treated with PPI‐B‐T‐M. Eleven of those 18 remained H. pylori positive (38.9% cured). Pretherapeutic metronidazole resistance was associated with a lower probability of eradication success (10% vs. 75%, p= .04). Ten of these 11 patients agreed to be retreated by PPI‐B‐T‐F. Final cure of H. pylori with PPI‐B‐T‐F was achieved in 9/10 patients (90%) nonresponsive to PPI‐B‐T‐M. Conclusions. In the presence of metronidazole resistance, PPI‐B‐T‐M as a recommended second‐line therapy by the Maastricht consensus conference achieved unacceptable low cure rates in our metronidazole pretreated population. In this population, metronidazole based second‐line quadruple therapy may be best suited in case of a metronidazole‐free first line‐regimen (e.g. PPI‐clarithromycin‐amoxicillin) or a low prevalence of metronidazole resistance. Furazolidone in the PPI‐B‐T‐F combination does not have a cross‐resistance potential to metronidazole and is a promising salvage option after a failed PPI‐B‐T‐M regimen.     

黄连素四联方案补救治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的有效性和安全性

目的:探索黄连素四联方案用于幽门螺杆菌感染根除失败患者补救治疗的有效性及安全性。方法:将经四联方案初次根除治疗失败并自愿接受补救治疗的130例患者按纳入顺序,以1:1的比例分配治疗,随机接受14天黄连素四联(埃索美拉唑20mg+胶体果胶铋200 mg+阿莫西林1000 mg,2/d+黄连素300 mg 3/d)或四环素四联(埃索美拉唑20 mg+胶体果胶铋200 mg+四环素750 mg+呋喃唑酮100 mg,2/d)方案的治疗。所有患者均于治疗14天及治疗结束至少28天后随诊,详细记录患者症状及不良反应情况。治疗结束至少28天后进行13C尿素呼气试验来判断幽门螺杆菌根除情况。结果:65例接受黄连素四联根除治疗,65例接受四环素四联方案治疗。两组分别有6例和4例患者因不良反应服药依从性小于80%,其余患者均完成了14天的治疗。黄连素组和四环素组的幽门螺杆菌根除率ITT分析分别为76.9%(50/65)和81.5%(53/65),P=0.520;PP分析分别为84.7%(50/59)和86.9%(53/61),P=0.739。黄连素组和四环素组不良事件总体发生率分别为49.2%和41.5%,P=0.370。结论:黄连素四联疗法用于幽门螺杆菌感染的二次根除治疗,根除率较高,未明显增加不良事件发生率,是有效及安全的补救治疗方案。