鼻白蚁科系统发育研究述评

鼻白蚁科是社会性昆虫白蚁的一个重要类群,包括许多世界性大害虫,且在等翅目昆虫系统发育中占有特殊的地位.本文概述了应用于鼻白蚁科系统发育研究的系统分类学方法,探讨了鼻白蚁科系统发育研究现状及存在的问题.鼻白蚁科不具有单系性,其系统发育问题有待深入研究.     

化学物质致突变性的检测方法研究进展

化学物质的致突变性评价对于预防人类疾病和控制环境污染具有非常重要的意义.为了检测化学物质的致突变性,对化学物质的致突变性评价中常用的一些主要方法及其应用的效果做了概述,并对当前致突变性检测的方法学中存在的问题以及发展趋势进行了简要的讨论.     

基于高通量测序技术的微生物检测数据分析方法

高通量测序技术的发展正在逐渐改变诸多生物学领域的研究方法.为应对突发疫情以及新发未知微生物威胁的需求,微生物鉴定技术逐渐从传统的物理化学方法及核酸杂交等分子水平方法进一步走向利用无需培养的测序数据进行快速分析检测.随之而来的是对高通量数据分析在精度及速度的要求.基于高通量测序数据的微生物检测数据分析方法在近些年得到了快速的发展.本文分析了目前基于高通量测序数据的微生物检测数据分析方法,对其数据分析的处理流程和计算方法进行了研究,比较了各个微生物检测数据分析方法的特点及适用场景.最后结合本实验室工作总结微生物检测数据分析方法在实际应用中可能遇到的问题,希望对该应用领域的研究有一定的参考意义.     

改进的系统发育谱算法在蛋白质功能注释中的应用

系统发育谱方法是目前研究较多的一种基于非同源性的生物大分子功能注释方法。针对现有算法存在的一些缺陷,从两个方面对该方法做了改进：一是构造基于权重的系统发育谱;二是采用改进的聚类算法对发育谱的相似性进行分析。从NCBI上下载100条Escherichia coli K12蛋白质作为实验数据,分别使用改进的算法和经典的层次聚类算法、K均值聚类算法对相似谱进行分析。结果显示,提出的改进算法在对相似谱聚类的精确度上明显优于后两种聚类算法。     

分子遗传标记技术在兔遗传多样性分析中的应用

实验兔是重要的实验动物之一,在医药领域发挥重要作用。各种分子遗传标记的出现为实验兔系统发育、种群遗传结构分析以及质量控制等各个领域提供了更为简便、可靠的研究手段。但目前,国内实验兔遗传质量不稳定,遗传背景不明确,严重制约着实验兔的应用。本文对各种分子标记在兔遗传多样性中的应用进行综述,以为实验兔遗传检测方法的建立提供帮助。     

原核生物eno基因在系统进化中应用及水平转移分析

多基因系统发育研究方法是系统发育分析中的一个重要手段,基因树冲突已成为分子系统发育研究中日益突出的问题。烯醇化酶基因(eno)及其编码的蛋白广泛存在于五界系统中,烯醇化酶为糖酵解途径中重要酶类。文章选取原核生物已注释的eno基因序列进行了系统发育分析。对其中的138个模式菌株的eno基因序列进行系统发育分析和同源性搜索,发现19个模式菌株的eno基因是通过水平转移而来;并通过核苷酸组成、密码子偏好性和基因排列等基因特征分析,进一步验证了水平转移基因的外源性。结果表明:原核生物eno序列具有较高保守性,其大小适中,是研究原核生物系统发育的良好材料。文章在对基因水平转移的供体和受体菌株生活习性、进化历史以及烯醇化酶的结构和功能的研究过程中提供重要参考价值。     

低等六足动物系统学研究进展

低等六足动物包括原尾纲、弹尾纲和双尾纲三个类群,是探讨六足动物起源和进化问题的关键类群,近十年来成为节肢动物系统进化研究中的焦点之一。低等六足动物的系统发育地位以及它们之间的关系一直是备受争论的问题。通过介绍三类低等六足动物最新的分类系统,从经典分类学和系统发育两个方面对低等六足动物近十年来的研究进展进行了综述。迄今,对于三类低等六足动物都建立了比较完备的分类体系,原尾纲划分为3目10科,弹尾纲划分为4目30科,双尾纲划分为2亚目3总科10科。系统发育研究中,大多数的系统发育分析结果不支持传统的缺尾类假说,缺尾纲应摒弃不用。分子数据分析的结果普遍支持原尾纲与双尾纲近缘,但仍需要进一步探讨。线粒体基因组、比较胚胎学和比较精子学的研究结果表明,原尾纲可能经历了长期的趋异进化历史。最近的比较精子学研究支持了双尾纲的单系性。总之,三类低等六足动物系统学研究均取得了长足的发展,但仍然存在诸如研究人员匮乏和研究水平不均衡等问题。系统发育研究中,分子系统学研究成为关注的焦点,而基于核基因和线粒体基因的数据分别建立的系统发育假说存在分歧,亟需开发更优的数据分析方法。此外,需加强低等六足动物比较形态学、比较胚胎学、发育生物学等方面的研究,以便将来进行全证据的系统发育研究。     

蕨类植物叶绿体基因ycf94的分子进化研究

ycf94基因是近年来在叶绿体基因组中新发现的一个基因,在蕨类植物中表现高度保守。该研究共选取94种蕨类植物,在系统发育背景下,对ycf94基因的结构特征、密码子偏好性、进化速率和适应性进化进行分析。结果表明, ycf94基因的密码子偏好性较弱,偏好使用以A/U结尾的密码子,且不同物种间的偏好性存在一定差异。密码子偏好性的形成主要受到突变压的影响,同时也存在其他因素的作用;基于凤尾蕨科和其他蕨类中ycf94基因的结构特征存在区别,对两者的分子替换速率进行了比较,表明颠换率、非同义替换率和ω值间存在显著差异;仅检测出1个正选择位点74A,强烈的负选择作用表明ycf94基因的结构和功能基本趋于稳定。这为蕨类系统发育分析提供了新依据,并提供了解析ycf94基因功能的线索。     

合欢、金合欢和银合欢根瘤菌系统发育研究方法比较

利用位于染色体不同位点的多个基因序列进行分析是原核生物分类与系统发育研究的一个热点.本文采用atpD和glnⅡ两个持家基因的部分序列对9株分离自我国合欢、金合欢和银合欢的根瘤菌进行系统发育研究,并与以16S rDNA基因序列构建的系统发育树进行比较.结果表明三者在属水平上基本一致,CCBAU43060、CCBAU61139位于Rhizobium-Agrobacterium系统发育分支内;CCBAU51471、CCBAU35220、CCBAU51276和CCBAU61158属于Mesorhizobium,CCBAU35234、CCBAU61178和CCBAU35085位于Bradyrhizobium系统发育分支;在属内种间个别菌株(CCBAU61158、CCBAU43060、CCBAU61178)的系统发育地位存在差异,表明属内种间存在较广泛的基因交流.因此利用16S rDNA确定属水平的分类地位比较可靠,但利用系统发育的方法研究属内种间亲缘关系应采用多个功能保守的持家基因同时进行分析才能得出比较可靠的结论.     

mILD: a tool for constructing and analyzing matrices of pairwise phylogenetic character incongruence tests

SUMMARY: Pairwise comparisons of disagreement in phylogenetic datasets offer a powerful tool for isolating historical incongruence for closer analysis. Statistically significant phylogenetic character incongruence may reflect important differences in evolutionary history, such as horizontal gene transfer. Such testing can also be used to specify possible combinations of datasets for further phylogenetic analysis. The process of comparing multiple datasets can be very time consuming, and it is sometimes unclear how to combine data partitions given the observed patterns of incongruence. Here we present an application that automates the process of making pairwise comparisons between large numbers of phylogenetic datasets using the Incongruence Length Difference (ILD) test. The application also implements strategies for data combination based on the patterns of incongruence observed in pairwise comparisons.     

A scalable and flexible approach for investigating the genomic landscapes of phylogenetic incongruence

Analyses of DNA sequence datasets have repeatedly revealed inconsistencies in phylogenetic trees derived with different data. This is termed phylogenetic incongruence, and may arise from a methodological failure of the inference process or from biological processes, such as horizontal gene transfer, incomplete lineage sorting, and introgression. To better understand patterns of incongruence, we developed a method (PartFinder) that uses likelihood ratios applied to sliding windows for visualizing tree-support changes across genome-sequence alignments, allowing the comparative examination of complex phylogenetic scenarios among many species. As a pilot, we used PartFinder to investigate incongruence in the Homo-Pan-Gorilla group as well as Platyrrhini using high-quality bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)-derived sequences as well as assembled whole-genome shotgun sequences. Our simulations verified the sensitivity of PartFinder, and our results were comparable to other studies of the Homo-Pan-Gorilla group. Analyses of the whole-genome alignments reveal significant associations between support for the accepted species relationship and specific characteristics of the genomic regions, such as GC-content, alignment score, exon content, and conservation. Finally, we analyzed sequence data generated for five platyrrhine species, and found incongruence that suggests a polytomy within Cebidae, in particular. Together, these studies demonstrate the utility of PartFinder for investigating the patterns of phylogenetic incongruence.     

Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny

Tests for incongruence as an indicator of among-data partition conflict have played an important role in conditional data combination. When such tests reveal significant incongruence, this has been interpreted as a rationale for not combining data into a single phylogenetic analysis. In this study of lorisiform phylogeny, we use the incongruence length difference (ILD) test to assess conflict among three independent data sets. A large morphological data set and two unlinked molecular data sets--the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene and the nuclear interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein (exon 1)--are analyzed with various optimality criteria and weighting mechanisms to determine the phylogenetic relationships among slow lorises (Primates, Loridae). When analyzed separately, the morphological data show impressive statistical support for a monophyletic Loridae. Both molecular data sets resolve the Loridae as paraphyletic, though with different branching orders depending on the optimality criterion or character weighting used. When the three data partitions are analyzed in various combinations, an inverse relationship between congruence and phylogenetic accuracy is observed. Nearly all combined analyses that recover monophyly indicate strong data partition incongruence (P = 0.00005 in the most extreme case), whereas all analyses that recover paraphyly indicate lack of significant incongruence. Numerous lines of evidence verify that monophyly is the accurate phylogenetic result. Therefore, this study contributes to a growing body of information affirming that measures of incongruence should not be used as indicators of data set combinability.     

Detecting phylogenetic incongruence using BIONJ: an improvement of the ILD test

The problem of testing for congruence between phylogenetic data has long been debated among phylogeneticists, but reaches a critical point with the availability of large amount of biological sequences. Notably in prokaryotes, where the amount of lateral transfers is believed to be important, the inference of phylogenies using multiple genes requires testing for incongruence before concatenating the genes. On another scale, incongruence tests can be used to detect recombination points within single gene alignments. The incongruence length difference test (ILD), based on parsimony, has been proved to be useful for finding incongruent data sets, but its application remains limited to small data sets for computational time reasons. Here, we have adapted the principle of ILD to the BIONJ algorithm. This algorithm is based on a tree length minimisation criterion and is suitable to replace parsimony in this test when used with uncorrected distance (model-free approach). We show that this new test, ILD-BIONJ, while being much faster, is often more accurate than the ILD test, especially when the alignments compared are simulated under different evolutionary models.     

Phylogenetic incongruence in the Drosophila melanogaster species group

Drosophila melanogaster and its close relatives are used extensively in comparative biology. Despite the importance of phylogenetic information for such studies, relationships between some melanogaster species group members are unclear due to conflicting phylogenetic signals at different loci. In this study, we use twelve nuclear loci (eleven coding and one non-coding) to assess the degree of phylogenetic incongruence in this model system. We focus on two nodes: (1) the node joining the Drosophila erecta-Drosophila orena, Drosophila melanogaster-Drosophila simulans, and Drosophila yakuba-Drosophila teissieri lineages, and (2) the node joining the lineages leading to the melanogaster, takahashii, and eugracilis subgroups. We find limited evidence for incongruence at the first node; our data, as well as those of several previous studies, strongly support monophyly of a clade consisting of D. erecta-D. orena and D. yakuba-D. teissieri. By contrast, using likelihood based tests of congruence, we find robust evidence for topological incongruence at the second node. Different loci support different relationships among the melanogaster, takahashii, and eugracilis subgroups, and the observed incongruence is not easily attributable to homoplasy, non-equilibrium base composition, or positive selection on a subset of loci. We argue that lineage sorting in the common ancestor of these three subgroups is the most plausible explanation for our observations. Such lineage sorting may lead to biased estimation of tree topology and evolutionary rates, and may confound inferences of positive selection.     

Unrecognized fine-scale recombination can mimic the effects of adaptive radiation

Gene sequences can undergo accelerated nucleotide changes and rapid diversification. The rapid sequence changes can then potentially lead to phylogenetic incongruence. Recently, Bodilis et al. (2011) observed artificial phylogenetic incongruence using the Pseudomonas surface protein gene oprF, and hypothesized that it was the result of a long-branch attraction artifact ultimately caused by adaptive radiation. In this study, an alternative hypothesis, namely fine-scale recombination, was tested on the same dataset. The results reveal that regions in oprF are of different evolutionary origins, and the mosaic gene structure resulted in confounding phylogenetic signals. These findings demonstrate that unrecognized fine-scale recombination can confound the phylogenetic interpretation and emphasize the limitation of using whole genes as the unit of phylogenetic analysis.     

Mitochondrial DNA,morphology, and the phylogenetic relationships of Antarctic icefishes (Notothenioidei: Channichthyidae)

The Channichthyidae is a lineage of 16 species in the Notothenioidei, a clade of fishes that dominate Antarctic near-shore marine ecosystems with respect to both diversity and biomass. Among four published studies investigating channichthyid phylogeny, no two have produced the same tree topology, and no published study has investigated the degree of phylogenetic incongruence between existing molecular and morphological datasets. In this investigation we present an analysis of channichthyid phylogeny using complete gene sequences from two mitochondrial genes (ND2 and 16S) sampled from all recognized species in the clade. In addition, we have scored all 58 unique morphological characters used in three previous analyses of channichthyid phylogenetic relationships. Data partitions were analyzed separately to assess the amount of phylogenetic resolution provided by each dataset, and phylogenetic incongruence among data partitions was investigated using incongruence length difference (ILD) tests. We utilized a parsimony-based version of the Shimodaira-Hasegawa test to determine if alternative tree topologies are significantly different from trees resulting from maximum parsimony analysis of the combined partition dataset. Our results demonstrate that the greatest phylogenetic resolution is achieved when all molecular and morphological data partitions are combined into a single maximum parsimony analysis. Also, marginal to insignificant incongruence was detected among data partitions using the ILD. Maximum parsimony analysis of all data partitions combined results in a single tree, and is a unique hypothesis of phylogenetic relationships in the Channichthyidae. In particular, this hypothesis resolves the phylogenetic relationships of at least two species (Channichthys rhinoceratus and Chaenocephalus aceratus), for which there was no consensus among the previous phylogenetic hypotheses. The combined data partition dataset provides substantial statistical power to discriminate among alternative hypotheses of channichthyid relationships. These findings suggest the optimal strategy for investigating the phylogenetic relationships of channichthyids is one that uses all available phylogenetic data in analyses of combined data partitions.     

Detecting hybrid speciation in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting using gene tree incongruence: A model

The application of phylogenetic inference methods, to data for a set of independent genes sampled randomly throughout the genome, often results in substantial incongruence in the single-gene phylogenetic estimates. Among the processes known to produce discord between single-gene phylogenies, two of the best studied in a phylogenetic context are hybridization and incomplete lineage sorting. Much recent attention has focused on the development of methods for estimating species phylogenies in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting, but phylogenetic models that allow for hybridization have been more limited. Here we propose a model that allows incongruence in single-gene phylogenies to be due to both hybridization and incomplete lineage sorting, with the goal of determining the contribution of hybridization to observed gene tree incongruence in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting. Using our model, we propose methods for estimating the extent of the role of hybridization in both a likelihood and a Bayesian framework. The performance of our methods is examined using both simulated and empirical data.     

Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined?

Advocates of conditional combination have argued that testing for incongruence between data partitions is an important step in data exploration. Unless the partitions have had distinct histories, as in horizontal gene transfer, incongruence means that one or more data support the wrong phylogeny. This study examines the relationship between incongruence and phylogenetic accuracy using three tests of incongruence. These tests were applied to pairs of mitochondrial DNA data partitions from two well-corroborated vertebrate phylogenies. Of the three tests, the most useful was the incongruence length difference test (ILD, also called the partition homogeneity test). This test distinguished between cases in which combining the data generally improved phylogenetic accuracy (P > 0.01) and cases in which accuracy of the combined data suffered relative to the individual partitions (P < 0.001). In contrast, in several cases, the Templeton and Rodrigo tests detected highly significant incongruence (P < 0.001) even though combining the incongruent partitions actually increased phylogenetic accuracy. All three tests identified cases in which improving the reconstruction model would improve the phylogenetic accuracy of the individual partitions.