Association between TNF-α polymorphisms and cervical cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is a vital cytokine involved in inflammation, immunity, and cellular organization. The TNFA-308G/A (rs1800629) and -238G/A (rs361525) polymorphisms are two widely investigated variants for their associations with risk of cervical cancer, but the results are conflicting. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to pool the data and evaluate the between-studies heterogeneity. All the case–control studies published from January 1989 to October 2010 on the association between the two polymorphisms of TNFA and cervical cancer risk were identified by searching the electronic literature Medline. The cervical cancer risk associated with the two polymorphisms of TNFA gene was estimated for each study by OR together with its 95% CI, respectively, by using the Review Manager 4.2 software. It was showed that the variant homozygote -308AA was associated with a significantly increased risk of cervical cancer (AA vs. GG: OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.03–1.92, P = 0.033; AA vs. GA/GG: OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.02–1.90, P = 0.036), and the effect was more evident among Asians (AA vs. GA/GG: OR = 3.67, 95% CI = 1.25–10.81, P = 0.018). We also found that the variant genotypes -238GA/AA was associated with a significantly decreased risk of cervical cancer (GA/AA vs. GG: OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.41–0.74, P < 0.001). The results suggested that TNFA-308G/A and -238G/A may contribute to cervical cancer susceptibility.     

Meta-analysis of TYK2 gene polymorphisms association with susceptibility to autoimmune and inflammatory diseases

The aim of our meta-analysis was to quantitatively summarize the association of TYK2 gene polymorphisms with autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. 11 studies that included data from 21497 cases and 22647 controls were identified. OR was used as a measure of the effect of the association in a fixed/random effect model. Meta-analysis was performed for six TYK2 gene polymorphisms (rs34536443, rs2304256, rs280523, rs280519, rs12720270 and rs12720356). Significant association was found in rs34536443 (C versus G: OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.69–0.84, P < 0.00001; GC + CC versus GG: OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.68–0.90, P = 0.0005; CC versus GG + GC: OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.28–2.05, P = 0.58; CC versus GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.27–2.02, P = 0.56; GC versus GG: OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.68–0.90, P = 0.0006) and rs2304256 (A versus C: OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.70–0.87, P < 0.0001; CA + AA versus CC: OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.59–0.81, P < 0.0001; AA versus CC + CA: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.66–1.00, P = 0.05; AA versus CC: OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.47–0.86, P = 0.003; CA versus CC: OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.60–0.83, P < 0.0001) in TYK2 gene, but not for the other polymorphisms (rs280523, rs280519, rs12720270, and rs12720356). This meta-analysis demonstrates that autoimmune and inflammatory diseases is associated with TYK2 gene rs34536443 and rs2304256 polymorphisms, but not rs280523, rs280519, rs12720270 and rs12720356.     

Combined analysis of the association between p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphisms and cancer risk

P73 is a structural and functional homologue of p53, and plays an important role in regulating cell cycle and apoptosis. A potentially functional polymorphism (designated as p73 G4C14-to-A4T14) has been identified in a region in exon 2 of the p73 gene, which may theoretically form a stem-loop structure and thereby affect p73 expression. Several investigations have reported the correlation between p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphism and cancer risk. However, the results are inconclusive. To further assess the association between p73 polymorphism and cancer risk, we performed meta-analysis of the data sets obtained from 26 individual studies involving 8,148 cancer patients and 8,150 controls. The association between p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphism and cancer risk was determined by crude odd ratios (OR) with 95% CI (confidential interval). AT-allele carriers were found to have a significantly increased risk of cervical cancer (AT/GC vs. GC/GC, OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.14–2.33; AT/AT + AT/GC vs. GC/GC, OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.05–2.10), colorectal cancer (AT/AT vs. AT/GC + GC/GC, OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.25–3.12), head and neck cancer (AT/AT + AT/GC vs. GC/GC, OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.06–1.96) and other cancers (AT/AT vs. GC/GC, OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.24–2.57; AT/AT vs. AT/GC + GC/GC, OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.26–2.56). In the stratified analysis of ethnicity, a significantly elevated cancer risk was found in Caucasians (AT/AT + AT/GC vs. GC/GC, OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.08–1.30; allele AT vs. allele GC, OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.06–1.24). No significant association of p73 polymorphism with the cancer risk of smoking was detected by stratified analysis by smoking status. Together, our data suggest that the p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 may be a risk factor of cancer especially in Caucasians.     

The Ku70 ?1310C/G promoter polymorphism is associated with breast cancer susceptibility in Chinese Han population

Ku70 plays an important role in the DSBR (DNA double-strand breaks repair) and maintenance of genomic integrity. Genetic variations within human Ku70 have been demonstrated to be associated with increased risk of several types of cancers. In this hospital-based case–control study, we aimed to investigate whether a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the promoter region (rs2267437) of Ku70 gene is associated with susceptibility to breast cancer in Chinese Han population. A total of 293 patients with breast cancer and 301 age-matched healthy controls were enrolled in this study. The Ku70 −1310C/G polymorphism was determined by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR–RFLP) analysis. A significant difference in genotype distribution and allele frequency was observed between patients and controls. The CG or GG carries were at higher risk of breast cancer compared with the CC homozygotes (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.02–2.00, P = 0.038 and OR = 3.53, 95% CI = 1.60–7.80, P = 0.002, respectively). Further stratification analysis revealed that G allele was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.21–2.33, P = 0.002), but not in postmenopausal women (OR = 1.33, 5% CI = 0.85–2.10, P = 0.216). Our study suggests that the Ku70 −1310C/G promoter polymorphism may be a susceptibility factor for breast cancer in Chinese Han population.     

Role of p53 and p73 genes polymorphisms in susceptibility to esophageal cancer: a case control study in a northern Indian population

Genetic variants in p53 and in its homologue p73 may modulate Esophageal Cancer (EC) risk because they are supposed to influence cell cycle progression, apoptosis and DNA repair. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the association of p53 intron3 16 bp duplication and p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphisms with susceptibility to EC in a northern Indian population in 255 EC patients and 255 age and sex matched healthy controls. We found that p53 intron3 16 bp duplication polymorphism was not associated with EC and its clinical characteristics. However, p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphism was associated with significant higher risk of EC (OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.16–2.60, P = 0.007) in an allele dose-dependent manner (P_trend = 0.0047). Stratification of subjects on the basis of clinical characteristics showed that p73 AT genotype carriers were at significant increased risk of developing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.18–2.67, P = 0.006) at middle third tumor location (OR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.18–2.97, P = 0.007) with lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.04–3.02, P = 0.035). No interaction with environmental risk factors was observed with any of the studied polymorphisms. In summary, p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphism but not the p53 intron3 16 bp duplication polymorphism is associated with EC and its clinical characteristics in northern Indian population.     

Association of a LSP1 gene rs3817198T>C polymorphism with breast cancer risk: evidence from 33,920 cases and 35,671 controls

Published data on the association between lymphocyte-specific protein 1 (LSP1) rs3817198T>C polymorphism and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis of the LSP1 gene and risk of breast cancer to obtain the most reliable estimate of the association. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted and pooled to assess the strength of the association between the LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism and risk of breast cancer. A total of seven eligible studies including 33,920 cases and 35,671 controls based on the search criteria were involved in this meta-analysis. The distributions of genotypes in the controls were all in agreement with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. We observed that the LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism was significantly correlated with breast cancer risk when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (the allele contrast model: OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.04–1.08; the homozygote codominant: OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.01–1.28). In the stratified analysis by ethnicity, significant association was observed in Caucasians for CC versus TT homozygote codominant model (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.03–1.52) and for the recessive model (OR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.02–1.47). There was significant association observed in Africans for CC versus TT homozygote codominant model (OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.22–0.92) and for the recessive model (OR = 0.43; 95% CI=0.22–0.88). Also, significant association was observed in mixed ethnicities for CC versus TT homozygote codominant model (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.05–1.19). When stratified by study design, statistically significantly elevated risk was found in nested case–control studies (CC vs. TT: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.05–1.19). But no significant association was observed for all comparison models between LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism and breast cancer risk in hospital-based and people-based studies. When stratified by BRCA1 mutation carriers status, statistically significantly elevated risk was found in this meta-analysis (the allele contrast model: OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.01–1.14; the dominant model: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.00–1.18). And significant association was found in the BRCA2 mutation carriers in the allele contrast (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.03–1.20), the homozygote codominant (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.04–1.47), the heterozygote codominant (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.00–1.25) and the dominant models (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.03–1.27). There was significant association between LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 positive cohort in all comparison models (the allele contrast model: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.03–1.13; CC vs. TT: OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.05–1.29; TC vs. TT: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.01–1.16; the dominant model: OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.03–1.17; the recessive model: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.01–1.23). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism is a low-penetrant risk factor for developing breast cancer but may not be in Africans.     

Evaluation of Toll-like receptors 3 (c.1377C/T) and 9 (G2848A) gene polymorphisms in cervical cancer susceptibility

Cervical cancer is emerging as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in women worldwide. Toll-like Receptor (TLR) gene polymorphisms may contribute to subsequent inter-individual variability in cancer susceptibility. The present study aimed to identify the role of TLR 3 (c.1377C/T) [rs3775290] and TLR 9 (G2848A) [rs352140] gene polymorphisms in the risk of developing cervical cancer in North India. Peripheral blood samples were collected from 200 histopathologically confirmed cervical cancer patients from North India and 200 unrelated, cancer-free, age-matched healthy female controls of similar ethnicity. Genomic DNA was extracted using the salting-out method, and genotyped for TLR 3 and TLR 9 using polymerase chain reaction-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). Our data demonstrated a lack of association between TLR 3 (c.1377C/T) and TLR 9 (G2848A) gene polymorphisms and the risk of developing cervical cancer. TLR 3 CT + TT was marginally associated (P = 0.061; age-adjusted OR = 1.46; 95% CI = 0.98–2.16) with cervical cancer susceptibility. The AA genotype of TLR 9 showed borderline significance (P = 0.053) conferring a marginal increased risk (OR = 2.63, 95%CI = 0.99–7.01) for advanced cancer stages (III + IV). Further, TLR 3 and 9 polymorphisms did not have a significant role in modulation of risk due to tobacco usage in cervical cancer patients. Our study suggests only marginal role of TLR 3 and 9 gene polymorphisms in cervical cancer susceptibility in North India; however, future studies in ethnically diverse populations may provide a more comprehensive involvement of innate immunity in cervical cancer etiology in women worldwide.     

Association of thrombospondin 1 gene with schizophrenia in Korean population

Thrombospondin 1 (THBS1), a multi-domain glycoprotein, is secreted from astrocytes and promotes synaptogenesis. Increasing evidence has suggested that not only various markers for synaptic pathology, but also astrocytes are affected in schizophrenia. In this study, we investigated whether coding region single nucleotide polymorphisms (cSNPs) of the THBS1 gene were associated with schizophrenia and with the clinical symptoms of schizophrenia patients. We genotyped two cSNPs [rs2228261 (Asn470Asn) and rs2292305 (Thr523Ala)] using direct sequencing in 220 schizophrenia patients and 376 control subjects. In this study, rs2228261 revealed significant association with schizophrenia in both codominant (TT vs. CC, P = 0.009, OR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.23–3.59) and recessive models (TT vs. CC/CT, P = 0.0012, OR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.38–3.77). Also, rs2292305 was associated with schizophrenia in the recessive model (GG vs. AA/AG, P = 0.0052, OR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.24–3.38). Additionally, in the analysis of the haplotype, the CA and TG haplotypes consisting of rs2228261 and rs2292305 were associated with schizophrenia in the dominant (P = 0.019, OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.10–2.90) and recessive models, respectively (P = 0.0086, OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.31–0.84). In further analysis according to the clinical symptoms, rs2292305 showed a weak association with the poor concentration symptoms of schizophrenia patients in the dominant model (AG/GG vs. AA, P = 0.024, OR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.09–3.83). The results suggest that the THBS1 gene may contribute to the susceptibility of schizophrenia.     

Quantitative assessment of the effect of MTHFR polymorphisms on the risk of lung carcinoma

Published studies on the relationships between 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms and lung cancer risk have been conflicting. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to assess the association between MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and lung cancer risk. A total of 15 studies including 10,753 cases and 11,275 controls described C677T genotypes, among which 11 articles totalling 6,161 cases and 7,684 controls described A1298C genotypes, were also involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significantly elevated lung cancer risk was found in any genetic models when all studies were pooled. For C677T polymorphism: (TT vs. CC: OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.97–1.42; TC vs. CC: OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.94–1.20; dominant model: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.96–1.24; and recessive model: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.95–1.24); for A1298C polymorphism: (CC vs. AA: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.91–1.19; AC vs. AA: OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.91–1.06; dominant model: OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.92–1.06; and recessive model: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.92–1.20). In the subgroup analyses, the results showed that 677T varients could decrease lung cancer risk in female (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.41–0.95, P-value = 0.03, 677CC as reference). No evidence of any associations of MTHFR A1298C polymorphism with lung cancer was found in overall or subgroup analyses. Our meta-analysis supports that the common polymorphisms of C677T and A1298C in MTHFR gene are not susceptibility gene for lung cancer from currently available evidence.     

CXCL12 G801A polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis

The G801A polymorphism in the CXCL12 gene has been implicated in breast cancer risk. However, the published findings are inconsistent. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to investigate this relationship. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association. The pooled ORs were performed for codominant model, dominant model, and recessive model, respectively. Five published case–control studies, including 1,058 breast cancer cases and 1,023 controls were identified. No study had a deviation from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in controls. We found that the CXCL12 G801A (rs1801157) polymorphism was associated with a significantly increased risk of breast cancer risk when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (codomiant model: AA versus GG, OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.16–2.33; GA versus GG, OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.18–1.71; dominant model: AA/GA versus GG, OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.21–1.72). Furthermore, Egger’s test did not show any evidence of publication bias (P > 0.05 for the dominant model). In conclusion, the results suggest that the CXCL12 G801A polymorphism may be a low-penetrant risk factor for developing breast cancer.     

Association of IL-10-1082 promoter polymorphism with susceptibility to gastric cancer: evidence from 22 case–control studies

Evidence suggested that interleukin-10 (IL-10) may be involved in the etiology of gastric cancer (GC). However, epidemiological studies on the association between IL-10-1082 promoter polymorphism and GC risk are still ambiguous. To quantitatively summarize the evidence for such a relationship, we performed a meta-analysis. Systemic searches of the PubMed and Medline databases were performed, with the last report up to July 2011. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of association. 22 independent studies including 4,289 cases and 5,965 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Obvious association was found when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (A vs. G: OR = 0.489, 95% CI = 0.335–0.713, P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, we observed significant associations in Asians (A vs. G: OR = 0.651, 95% CI = 0.506–0.838, P = 0.001; AA vs. GG: OR = 0.482, 95% CI = 0.328–0.709, P < 0.001; AA/AG vs. GG: OR = 0.711, 95% CI = 0.527–0.959, P = 0.025; AA vs. AG/GG: OR = 0.701, 95% CI = 0.520–0.944, P = 0.019) and Caucasians (A vs. G: OR = 0.365, 95% CI = 0.140–0.949, P = 0.039), but not in Latino population. When stratified analysis by control sources, our results indicated that A allele decreased approximately 48% risk among population-based studies (A vs. G: OR = 0.524, 95% CI = 0.374–0.733, P < 0.001). Taken together, this meta-analysis suggests that IL-10-1082 polymorphism is associated with GC risk.     

Association between ATM 5557G>A polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between ATM 5557G>A (p.D1853N) polymorphism and breast cancer risk. However, the results remain conflicting rather than conclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, we performed this meta-analysis. Systematic searches of PubMed and Medline databases were performed. A total of nine studies included 3155 cases and 2752 controls were identified. When all nine studies were pooled into the meta-analysis, there was no evidence for significant association between 5557G>A mutation and breast cancer risk(for G/A vs. G/G: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.83–1.34; for A/A vs. G/G: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.58–1.03; for dominant model: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.82–1.31; for recessive model: OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.69–1.09). In the subgroup analyses by family history and ethnicity, significant associations were found among Amerindians (for G/A vs. G/G: OR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.38–3.47; for dominant model: OR = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.37–3.38). In summary, the meta-analysis suggest that ATM 5557G>A polymorphism is associated with increased breast cancer risk among Amerindians. However, due to the small subjects included in analysis and the selection bias existed in some studies, the results for Amerindians should be interpreted with caution.     

XPA A23G polymorphism and susceptibility to cancer: a meta-analysis

Xeroderma pigmentosum group A (XPA) participates in modulating recognition of DNA damage during the DNA nucleotide excision repair process. The XPA A23G polymorphism has been investigated in case–control studies to evaluate the cancer risk attributed to the variant, but the results were conflicting. To clarify the effect of XPA A23G polymorphism in cancer risk, we conducted a meta-analysis that included 30 published case–control studies. Overall, no significant association of XPA A23G variant with cancer susceptibility was observed for any genetic model. However, significant association was observed for colorectal cancer (GG vs. AA: OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.15–2.44; dominant genetic model GG + AG vs. AA: OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.08–1.17), for breast cancer an increased but non-significant risk was found (GG vs. AA: OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.98–1.66; dominant genetic model GG + AG vs. AA: OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.99–1.63), and for head and neck cancer an increased risk was observed in recessive model (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.02–1.38), whereas for lung cancer a significant reduced risk was observed (GG vs. AA: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.66–0.90; dominant genetic model GG + AG vs. AA: OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.66–0.87), it’s noting that in Asian population the inverse association was more apparent. In addition, in Asian population for esophageal cancer a significant decreased risk was also found in dominant genetic model (OR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.43–0.70) and for head and neck cancer an increased risk was observed in dominant genetic model (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.03–2.23). The meta-analysis suggested that the XPA A23G G allele is a low-penetrant risk factor for cancer development.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">FAS</Emphasis> −1,377 G/A polymorphism is associated with cancer susceptibility: evidence from 10,564 cases and 12,075 controls

Published data on the association between FAS −1,377 G/A polymorphism and cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. A total of 17 studies including 10,564 cases and 12,075 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, significantly elevated cancer risk was associated with AA variant genotype when all the eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (for AA vs GG: OR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.01–1.40; P _{heterogeneity} = 0.05; for recessive model: OR = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.04–1.41; P _{heterogeneity} = 0.05). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, borderline statistically significantly increased risks were found among Asians for recessive model (OR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.00–1.45; P _{heterogeneity} = 0.01). In the subgroup analysis by population-based controls or hospital-based controls, statistically significantly increased risks were found among groups with population-based controls for AA versus GG (OR = 1.27; 95% CI = 1.02–1.58; P _{heterogeneity} = 0.05) and recessive model (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.00–1.59; P _{heterogeneity} = 0.01). For breast cancer, borderline statistically significantly increased risks were found for AA versus GG (OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.00–1.67; P _{heterogeneity} = 0.41). In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that the FAS −1,377 G/A polymorphism is associated with cancer susceptibility. L. X. Qiu, J. Shi and H. Yuan contributed equally to this work and should be considered as co-first authors.     

Survivin promoter ?31G/C (rs9904341) polymorphism and cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis to assess the association of survivin −31 G/C promoter polymorphism and cancer risk. Thirteen case–control studies identified through PubMed and published between 2007 and 2011 with a total of 3329 cancer cases and 3979 controls were included in this meta-analysis. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used to investigate the strength of the association. Overall, the pooled analysis showed that survivin −31C allele was associated with 1.27 fold increased risk of cancer compared with the −31G allele (95% CI = 1.091–1.479; random model). Subgroup analyses based on type of cancer and ethnicity were also performed, and results indicated that survivin −31G/C polymorphism was not associated with risk of gastric cancer [OR = 2.879; 95% CI = 0.553–15.004) for CC vs.GG] and esophageal cancer [OR = 1.352; 95% CI = 0.494–3.699) for CC vs.GG]. Stratification on the basis of ethnicity showed that the risk due to −31C allele was significant only in Asian population [OR = 1.894; 95% CI = 1.206–2.974 for CC vs.GG]. The present meta-analysis suggests an important role of survivin −31 G/C polymorphism with cancer risk especially in Asian population. However, further studies with larger sample size are required to draw more comprehensive conclusions and provide more precise evidence in individual cancers.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">TGFBR1</Emphasis>*6A/9A polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 13,662 cases and 14,147 controls

Published data on the association between TGFBR1*6A/9A polymorphism and cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. A total of 32 studies including 13,662 cases and 14,147 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, significantly elevated cancer risks were associated with TGFBR1*6A in all genetic models (for allelic effect: OR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.03–1.21; for 6A/6A vs. 9A/9A: OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.01–1.69; for 9A/6A vs. 9A/9A: OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.01–1.15; for dominant model: OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.02–1.15; for recessive model: OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.00–1.68). In the subgroup analysis by cancer types, significant associations were found in breast cancer (for allelic effect: OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.01–1.34) and ovarian cancer (for allelic effect: OR = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.00–1.54; for 6A/6A vs. 9A/9A: OR = 2.34; 95% CI = 1.03–5.33). However, no significant associations were found in colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, prostate cancer and lung cancer for all genetic models. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that the TGFBR1*6A/9A polymorphism is associated with cancer susceptibility, increasing the risk of breast and ovarian cancer.     

Contribution of the IBD5 locus to inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis

To evaluate the association of the IBD5 locus to the predisposition of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), a series of meta-analyses between five IBD5 variants (OCTN1 C1672T, OCTN2 G-207C, OCTN1/2 TC haplotype, IGR2096a_1, IGR2198a_1 and IGR2230a_1) and Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) were performed, which included a total of 26 studies. Overall, five IBD5 variants in a per-allele model of inheritance were significantly associated with elevated CD risk (for OCTN1: OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.16–1.30, P < 0.001; for OCTN2: OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.11–1.30, P < 0.001; for IGR2096a_1: OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.24–1.46, P < 0.001; for IGR2198a_1: OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.24–1.46, P < 0.001; for IGR2230a_1: OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.23–1.48, P < 0.001) and OCTN1/2 TC haplotype (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.22–1.43, P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, the statistically significant associations were also observed in adult- and pediatric-onset CD and in Caucasians for five IBD5 variants and the OCTN1/2 TC haplotype. A statistically significant increase in the risk of UC was detected in a recessive model of inheritances for OCTN1 (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.08–1.40, P < 0.001), OCTN2 (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.05–1.33, P = 0.006), IGR2096a_1 (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.15–1.62, P < 0.001) and IGR2198a_1 (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.10–1.66, P = 0.004); the increased risks of UC were maintained in the adult and Caucasian subgroups, but not the pediatric subgroup. In summary, our results suggested that the IBD5 locus contributes to the susceptibility of CD in a per-allele manner in adults, children and Caucasians, and the locus contributes to the susceptibility of UC in a recessive manner in adult and Caucasian populations.     

A common variant in the adiponectin gene and polycystic ovary syndrome risk

In this study, we explored whether polymorphisms in insulin receptor (INSR), adiponectin (ADIPOQ), parathyroid hormone (PTH), and vitamin D receptor (VDR) genes are associated with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). A total of 362 subjects, including 181 women with PCOS and 181 controls were enrolled in this case-control study. Two SNPs (rs2059806 and rs1799817) in the INSR gene, two SNPs (rs2241766 and rs1501299) in the ADIPOQ gene, one SNP (rs6256) in the PTH gene, and one SNP (rs757343) in the VDR gene were analyzed using PCR-RFLP method. We observed no significant difference in genotype and allele frequencies between the women with PCOS and controls for the rs2059806, rs1799817, rs1501299, rs6256, and rs757343 polymorphisms either before or after adjustment for confounding factors including age and BMI. However, the ADIPOQ rs2241766 “TT” genotype compared with “TG and GG” genotypes was associated with a 1.93-fold increased risk for PCOS (P = 0.006, OR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.20–3.11), and the differences remained significant after adjustment for age and BMI (P = 0.039, OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.03–2.86). Furthermore, the ADIPOQ rs2241766 “T” allele was significantly overrepresented in women with PCOS than controls (P = 0.006; OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.18–2.70), and the difference remained significant after Bonferroni correction. Our findings suggest that the ADIPOQ rs2241766 “TT” genotype is a marker of increased PCOS susceptibility. This study also indicates for the first time that there are no significant association between INSR rs2059806, PTH rs6256, and VDR rs757343 gene polymorphisms and PCOS risk. However, these data remain to be confirmed in larger studies and in other populations.     

The association of polymorphisms on TGFBR1 and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Epidemiological studies found inconsistent results on the association of two variants on TGFBR1 (TGFBR1*6A and Int7G24A) with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. The present study was aimed to evaluate the association of these two variants with CRC susceptibility via the meta-analysis methods. For variant TGFBR1*6A, nine reports including 6,765 CRC patients and 8,496 unrelated controls were identified. The heterozygotes *6A/*9A showed a significant increased risk of CRC with the pooled OR was 1.12 (95% CI = 1.02–1.23), and the pooled OR for the homozygotes *6A/*6A was 1.13 (95% CI = 0.80–1.58) compared to the homozygotes *9A/*9A. However, under the dominant effect model, the TGFBR1*6A carriers showed a significantly increased CRC risk (pooled OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.03–1.23, *6A/*6A and *6A/*9A vs. *9A/*9A). For variant Int7G24A, three case–control studies with 1,074 cases and 1,945 controls were found. Although no significant association was found for heterozygosity Int7G24A carriers with CRC risk (pooled OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.67–1.42), the homozygosity A/A carriers showed a significant elevated risk of CRC (pooled OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.14–2.47) compared to G/G homozygotes. Under the recessive effect model, homozygotes A/A showed a 71% increase of CRC risk compared to the A/G and G/G genotype carriers (pooled OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.17–2.51). These data strongly suggested that the two polymorphisms of TGFBR1 may confer low-penetrance susceptibility of CRC risk.     

Current evidences on vascular endothelial growth factor polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility

Several polymorphisms of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) such as 936 C/T, −2578 C/A, −406 C/T, and −1154 G/A polymorphism have been identified. Published data on the association between VEGF polymorphisms and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Crude OR with 95% CI was used to assess the strength of association between them. For VEGF 936C/T polymorphism, a total of 10 studies including 7,685 cases and 7,915 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significant associations were found between VEGF 936C/T polymorphism and breast cancer risk when all studies pooled into the meta-analysis (TC vs. CC: OR = 0.904, 95% CI = 0.797–1.024; TT vs. CC: OR = 0.974, 95% CI = 0.786–1.205; dominant model: OR = 0.911, 95% CI = 0.811–1.024; and recessive model: OR = 0.991, 95% CI = 0.801–1.226). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, still no significant associations were found for all comparison models. For −2578 C/A, −406 C/T, and −1154 G/A polymorphism, there were too limited data to perform a meta-analysis. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the VEGF 936C/T polymorphism may be not associated with breast cancer development. However, large sample and representative population-based studies with homogeneous breast cancer patients and well matched controls are warranted to confirm this finding.