印记基因DLK1的研究进展

在哺乳动物中,有一部分特别的基因,它们由于受到印迹而只表达单一亲本的基因,这种表观遗传的修饰现象就是基因组印记,这有别于经典的孟德尔遗传学定律。DNA甲基化是一种重要的表观遗传修饰,主要的修饰部位发生在DNA的CpG岛,它参与了细胞分化,基因组稳定性、基因印记等多种细胞生物学过程,基因印迹的建立和维持是胚胎正常发育的基础,这一过程的实现有赖于各种DNA甲基化转移酶的精确表达和密切的配合。已发现在哺乳动物的基因组中存在着许多的印记基因,DLK1基因为父系表达母源沉默的印记基因,它的表达同样受到DNA甲基化的调节,它首先在神经母细胞瘤发现并克隆,定位于人类染色体14q32,属于表皮生长因子样超家族的成员之一,约有6个外显子。研究表明,DLK1基因在胚胎肝、早期肌肉组织以及造血干细胞等组织中均有表达,人DLK1基因全长1557bp,编码序列含有1152核苷酸,编码383个氨基酸残基,在人、小鼠、绵羊都存在保守序列,它参与多种细胞的增殖、分化并且与相关肿瘤的发生发展有着密切的关系,印迹基因的印迹异常与肿瘤的易感性及发生发展有重要的关系,本文就国内外DLK1基因的研究进展做一综述。     

DNA甲基化——肿瘤产生的一种表观遗传学机制

在人类基因组中,DNA甲基化是一种表观遗传修饰,它与肿瘤的发生关系密切。抑癌基因和DNA修复基因的高甲基化、重复序列DNA的低甲基化、某些印记基因的印记丢失与多种肿瘤的发生有关。目前研究发现,基因组中甲基化的水平不仅受DNA 甲基化转移酶（DNMT）的影响,还与组蛋白甲基化、叶酸摄入、RNA干扰等多种因素有关。DNA甲基化在基因转录过程中扮有重要角色,并与组蛋白修饰、染色质构型重塑共同参与转录调控。     

哺乳动物基因组印记的擦除、建立和维持机理

基因组印记主要依靠印记基因DNA甲基化方式调控,这种表观遗传修饰让多种哺乳动物出现基因单等位表达现象。印记的擦除发生在原始生殖细胞(primordial germ cells,PGCs)时期,其主要途径为活化诱导的胞苷脱氨酶(activation-induced cytidine deaminase,AID)、TET(ten-eleven translocation)蛋白介导的去甲基化。印记的建立发生在配子发生期,雌雄有明显的不同。印记的维持在多种因子的共同作用下完成,主要参与的蛋白有Dnmt1、Dppa3、KAP1和ZFP57等。印记的维持贯穿整个发育阶段,并通过细胞分裂遗传给子代。机体正常生长发育有赖于印记基因的正常表达。随着第一个印记基因IGF2R的发现,对于印记机制的研究不断推进。该文将概述基因组印记的建立、维持、擦除机理以及克隆动物中存在的印记基因异常重编程。     

胚胎发育过程中的DNA甲基化作用

哺乳动物的正常发育取决于表观遗传学调控机制准确无误地运行.其中尤为重要的是发生在原生殖细胞和胚胎中的基因组范围内的DNA甲基化模式重排等表观遗传学修饰.胚胎发育过程中的DNA甲基化作用与基因印记的建立、基因表达的调控以及细胞和胚胎的形态建成都密切相关.DNA甲基化发生机制和功能的阐明将对哺乳动物个体发育与人类疾病研究有重要意义.     

DNA甲基化与癌症

DNA甲基化是重要的表观遗传修饰,主要发生在DNA的CpG岛. DNA的甲基化通过DNA甲基转移酶（DNA methyltransferases, DNMTs）完成. DNA甲基化参与了细胞分化、基因组稳定性、X染色体失活、基因印记等多种细胞生物学过程.单基因水平及基因组范围内的DNA甲基化改变在肿瘤发生发展中亦发挥重要作用. 抑癌基因的异常甲基化引起的表达抑制,可导致肿瘤细胞的增殖失控和侵袭转移,并参与肿瘤组织的血管生成过程.在许多肿瘤的研究中都发现了基因组整体DNA低甲基化所导致的染色体不稳定性. 本文从DNA的异常高甲基化和低甲基化两方面论述了DNA甲基化在细胞恶变发生发展过程中的改变及其影响,并阐述了DNA甲基化改变在肿瘤诊断和治疗中的作用.     

非编码RNA诱导的表观遗传学与肿瘤的发生

ncRNA可以通过多种遗传机理调控DNA的结构、RNA的表达和稳定性以及蛋白质的翻译和功能,最近研究证实小RNA可以通过指导基因组表现修饰DNA甲基化和组蛋白修饰引起癌遗传学途径基因失能与获能,增加基因组不稳定,印记丢失等途径参与肿瘤的发生发展.探索ncRNA对肿瘤细胞中基因的异常表达的影响和作用有助于将癌基因组学与表观遗传学的研究结合起来.为研发防治肿瘤的新方法和新途径提供新的思路.     

DNA甲基化与基因表达调控研究进展

表观遗传修饰是指不改变DNA序列的、可遗传的对碱基和组蛋白的化学修饰,主要包括DNA甲基化、组蛋白修饰、染色质重塑以及非编码RNA等.表观遗传修饰是更高层次的基因表达调控手段.DNA甲基化是一种重要的表观遗传修饰,参与基因表达调控、基因印记、转座子沉默、X染色体失活以及癌症发生等重要生物学过程.近年来随着研究方法和技术的进步,全基因组DNA甲基化的研究广泛兴起,多个物种全基因组甲基化图谱被破译,全局水平对DNA甲基化的研究不仅利于在宏观层面上了解DNA甲基化的特性与规律,同时也为深入分析DNA甲基化的生物学功能与调控奠定了基础.结合最新研究进展综述DNA甲基化在基因组中的分布模式、规律以及和基因转录的关系等.     

表观遗传信息在动物胚胎发育过程中的重编程

表观遗传修饰调控基因的表达对胚胎发育至关重要。近期,对表观遗传修饰在跨代遗传及早期胚胎发育重编程方面的认识获得了突破性进展。在此,着重阐述DNA甲基化修饰和染色体3D结构在跨代遗传和胚胎发育过程的重编程。在斑马鱼中,子代胚胎抛弃卵子的甲基化图谱,而完全继承精子的DNA甲基化图谱;哺乳动物早期胚胎发育过程出现了全基因组去甲基化的过程,父源和母源基因组都存在主动和被动的去甲基化过程。染色体3D结构在动物受精后,TAD(topologically associated domain)结构消失,并逐渐重新建立。这些重编程对胚胎的发育过程的基因调控起着重要的作用。     

乳腺癌相关基因的DNA甲基化

乳腺癌是女性最常见的恶性肿瘤之一。DNA甲基化作为哺乳动物细胞基因组修饰和表达调控的表观遗传学方式,在肿瘤的发生发展过程中总体水平降低,但同时又伴随某些基因的高甲基化。在乳腺癌中,多种关键基因的表达缺失都与其CpG岛高甲基化有关。     

生殖细胞及早期胚胎基因组印记的表观调控

基因组印记是一种区别父母等位基因的表观遗传过程,可导致父源和母源基因特异性表达。印记是在配子发生过程中全基因组表观重编程时获得的,且在早期胚胎发育过程中得以维持。因此,在全基因组重编程过程中,对印记的识别和维持十分重要。本文概述了原始生殖细胞的印记清除、双亲原始生殖细胞的印记获得以及早期胚胎发育过程中印记维持的相关过程,并对在印记区域内保护印记基因免受全基因组DNA去甲基化的表观遗传因子的相关作用机制进行了讨论。     

Genome-wide survey of imprinted genes

The developmental failure of mammalian parthenogenote has been a mystery for a long time and posed a question as to why bi-parental reproduction is necessary for development to term. In the 1980s, it was proven that this failure was not due to the genetic information itself, but to epigenetic modification of genomic DNA. In the following decade, several studies successfully identified imprinted genes which were differentially expressed in a parent-of-origin-specific manner, and it was shown that the differential expression depended on the pattern of DNA methylation. These facts prompted development of genome-wide systematic screening methods based on DNA methylation and differential gene expression to identify imprinted genes. Recently computational approaches and microarray technology have been introduced to identify imprinted genes/loci, contributing to the expansion of our knowledge. However, it has been shown that the gene silencing derived from genomic imprinting is accomplished by several mechanisms in addition to direct DNA methylation, indicating that novel approaches are further required for comprehensive understanding of genomic imprinting. To unveil the mechanism of developmental failure in mammalian parthenogenote, systematic screenings for imprinted genes/loci have been developed. In this review, we describe genomic imprinting focusing on the history of genome-wide screening.     

The effects of culture on genomic imprinting profiles in human embryonic and fetal mesenchymal stem cells

Human embryonic stem (hES) cells and fetal mesenchymal stem cells (fMSC) offer great potential for regenerative therapy strategies. It is therefore important to characterize the properties of these cells in vitro. One major way the environment impacts on cellular physiology is through changes to epigenetic mechanisms. Genes subject to epigenetic regulation via genomic imprinting have been characterized extensively. The integrity of imprinted gene expression therefore provides a measurable index for epigenetic stability. Allelic expression of 26 imprinted genes and DNA methylation at associated differentially methylated regions (DMRs) was measured in fMSC and hES cell lines. Both cell types exhibited monoallelic expression of 13 imprinted genes, biallelic expression of six imprinted genes, and there were seven genes that differed in allelic expression between cell lines. fMSC s exhibited the differential DNA methylation patterns associated with imprinted expression. This was unexpected given that gene expression of several imprinted genes was biallelic. However, in hES cells, differential methylation was perturbed. These atypical methylation patterns did not correlate with allelic expression. Our results suggest that regardless of stem cell origin, in vitro culture affects the integrity of imprinted gene expression in human cells. We identify biallelic and variably expressed genes that may inform on overall epigenetic stability. As differential methylation did not correlate with imprinted expression changes we propose that other epigenetic effectors are adversely influenced by the in vitro environment. Since DMR integrity was maintained in fMSC but not hES cells, we postulate that specific hES cell derivation and culturing practices result in changes in methylation at DMRs.Key words: genomic imprinting, embryonic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, differentiation, methylation, epigenetic stability     

The effects of culture on genomic imprinting profiles in human embryonic and fetal mesenchymal stem cells

Human embryonic stem (hES) cells and fetal mesenchymal stem cells (fMSC) offer great potential for regenerative therapy strategies. It is therefore important to characterise the properties of these cells in vitro. One major way the environment impacts on cellular physiology is through changes to epigenetic mechanisms. Genes subject to epigenetic regulation via genomic imprinting have been characterised extensively. The integrity of imprinted gene expression therefore provides a measurable index for epigenetic stability. Allelic expression of 26 imprinted genes and DNA methylation at associated differentially methylated regions (DMRs) was measured in fMSC and hES cell lines. Both cell types exhibited monoallelic expression of 13 imprinted genes, biallelic expression of six imprinted genes, and there were seven genes that differed in allelic expression between cell lines. fMSCs exhibited the differential DNA methylation patterns associated with imprinted expression. This was unexpected given that gene expression of several imprinted genes was biallelic. However, in hES cells, differential methylation was perturbed. These atypical methylation patterns did not correlate with allelic expression. Our results suggest that regardless of stem cell origin, in vitro culture affects the integrity of imprinted gene expression in human cells. We identify biallelic and variably expressed genes that may inform on overall epigenetic stability. As differential methylation did not correlate with imprinted expression changes we propose that other epigenetic effectors are adversely influenced by the in vitro environment. Since DMR integrity was maintained in fMSC but not hES cells, we postulate that specific hES cell derivation and culturing practices result in changes in methylation at DMRs.     

Erasing genomic imprinting memory in mouse clone embryos produced from day 11.5 primordial germ cells

Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism that causes functional differences between paternal and maternal genomes, and plays an essential role in mammalian development. Stage-specific changes in the DNA methylation patterns of imprinted genes suggest that their imprints are erased some time during the primordial germ cell (PGC) stage, before their gametic patterns are re-established during gametogenesis according to the sex of individuals. To define the exact timing and pattern of the erasure process, we have analyzed parental-origin-specific expression of imprinted genes and DNA methylation patterns of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in embryos, each derived from a single day 11.5 to day 13.5 PGC by nuclear transfer. Cloned embryos produced from day 12.5 to day 13.5 PGCs showed growth retardation and early embryonic lethality around day 9.5. Imprinted genes lost their parental-origin-specific expression patterns completely and became biallelic or silenced. We confirmed that clones derived from both male and female PGCs gave the same result, demonstrating the existence of a common default state of genomic imprinting to male and female germlines. When we produced clone embryos from day 11.5 PGCs, their development was significantly improved, allowing them to survive until at least the day 11.5 embryonic stage. Interestingly, several intermediate states of genomic imprinting between somatic cell states and the default states were seen in these embryos. Loss of the monoallelic expression of imprinted genes proceeded in a step-wise manner coordinated specifically for each imprinted gene. DNA demethylation of the DMRs of the imprinted genes in exact accordance with the loss of their imprinted monoallelic expression was also observed. Analysis of DNA methylation in day 10.5 to day 12.5 PGCs demonstrated that PGC clones represented the DNA methylation status of donor PGCs well. These findings provide strong evidence that the erasure process of genomic imprinting memory proceeds in the day 10.5 to day 11.5 PGCs, with the timing precisely controlled for each imprinted gene. The nuclear transfer technique enabled us to analyze the imprinting status of each PGC and clearly demonstrated a close relationship between expression and DNA methylation patterns and the ability of imprinted genes to support development.     

Reproductive barrier and genomic imprinting in the endosperm of flowering plants

In flowering plants, success or failure of seed development is determined by various genetic mechanisms. During sexual reproduction, double fertilization produces the embryo and endosperm, which both contain maternally and paternally derived genomes. In endosperm, a reproductive barrier is often observed in inter-specific crosses. Endosperm is a tissue that provides nourishment for the embryo within the seed, in a similar fashion to the placenta of mammals, and for the young seedling after germination. This review considers the relationship between the reproductive barrier in endosperm and genomic imprinting. Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism that results in mono-allelic gene expression that is parent-of-origin dependent. In Arabidopsis, recent studies of several imprinted gene loci have identified the epigenetic mechanisms that determine genomic imprinting. A crucial feature of genomic imprinting is that the maternally and paternally derived imprinted genes must carry some form of differential mark, usually DNA methylation and/or histone modification. Although the epigenetic marks should be complementary on maternally and paternally imprinted genes within a single species, it is possible that neither the patterns of epigenetic marks nor expression of imprinted genes are the same in different species. Moreover, in hybrid endosperm, the regulation of expression of imprinted genes can be affected by upstream regulatory mechanisms in the male and female gametophytes. Species-specific variations in epigenetic marks, the copy number of imprinted genes, and the epigenetic regulation of imprinted genes in hybrids might all play a role in the reproductive barriers observed in the endosperm of interspecific and interploidy crosses. These predicted molecular mechanisms might be related to earlier models such as the "endosperm balance number" (EBN) and "polar nuclei activation" (PNA) hypotheses.     

Genomic imprinting and epigenetic reprogramming: unearthing the garden of forking paths

Genomic imprinting, an epigenetic form of gene regulation, determines the parent-dependent gene expression of marked or imprinted genes during gametogenesis and embryonic development. Imprinting involves differential allele DNA methylation in one sex cell lineage but not in the other. Egg and sperm each contributes the same DNA sequences to the zygote but epigenetic imprinting of a subset of genes determines that only one of the parent alleles are expressed relative to the parental origin. Primordial germ cells inherit biallelically imprinted genes from maternal and paternal origin and erase their imprints to start de novo monoallelic imprinting during gametogenesis. Epigenetic paternalization is an ongoing process in the mitotically-dividing spermatogonial stem cell and derived meiotically-dividing spermatocyte progeny to endow sperm with imprinted alleles. Epigenetic maternalization is restricted to the oocyte growth phase of folliculogenesis and is unrelated to DNA replication since it takes place while the oocyte remains in the diplotene stage of meiotic prophase I. Sperm and oocyte genomic methylation patterns depend on the activity of DNA methyltransferases (Dnmt). A variant of Dnmt1, designated Dnmt1o, accumulates in oocyte nuclei during the follicular growth phase. Dnmt3L, an isoform of Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b, but lacking enzymatic activity, interacts with Dnmt2a and Dnmt3b and is required for spermatogenesis. In the mouse early zygote, the male pronucleus is demethylated within 4 h of fertilization. Global demethylation takes place gradually up to the morula stage. In the blastocyst, de novo methylation is reestablished in the inner cell mass but not in the trophectoderm. Both the significance of genomic imprinting and the severe developmental defects caused by disrupted Dnmt activity, point to a need for a better understanding of the causes of low cloning efficiency by somatic nuclear transfer to enucleated ovulated oocyte.     

Maintenance of DNA methylation during the Arabidopsis life cycle is essential for parental imprinting

Imprinted genes are expressed predominantly from either their paternal or their maternal allele. To date, all imprinted genes identified in plants are expressed in the endosperm. In Arabidopsis thaliana, maternal imprinting has been clearly demonstrated for the Polycomb group gene MEDEA (MEA) and for FWA. Direct repeats upstream of FWA are subject to DNA methylation. However, it is still not clear to what extent similar cis-acting elements may be part of a conserved molecular mechanism controlling maternally imprinted genes. In this work, we show that the Polycomb group gene FERTILIZATION-INDEPENDENT SEED2 (FIS2) is imprinted. Maintenance of FIS2 imprinting depends on DNA methylation, whereas loss of DNA methylation does not affect MEA imprinting. DNA methylation targets a small region upstream of FIS2 distinct from the target of DNA methylation associated with FWA. We show that FWA and FIS2 imprinting requires the maintenance of DNA methylation throughout the plant life cycle, including male gametogenesis and endosperm development. Our data thus demonstrate that parental genomic imprinting in plants depends on diverse cis-elements and mechanisms dependent or independent of DNA methylation. We propose that imprinting has evolved under constraints linked to the evolution of plant reproduction and not by the selection of a specific molecular mechanism.     

Imprinting mechanisms and genes involved in Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes

Prader-Willi (PWS) and Angelman (AS) syndromes illustrate a disease paradigm of genomic imprinting, an epigenetic modification of DNA that results in parent-of-origin specific expression during embryogenesis and in the adult. From genetic data, at least two imprinted genes may be required for the classical PWS phenotype, whereas AS probably involves a single imprinted gene, and rare familial forms of both disorders involve imprinting mutations. In addition, the nonimprinted P gene is associated with pigmentation disorders in PWS, AS and oculocutaneous albinism. Identification of new genes, delineation of small deletions in unique patients, and direct screening for imprinted sequences, should soon identify candidate genes for PWS and AS. The mechanism of imprinting involves DNA methylation and replication timing, and appears to include multiple imprinted genes within a large imprinted domain. Imprinting of these genes may be regulated in cis, by an imprinting control element (ICE). Future studies can be expected to unravel the gene identities and imprinting mechanisms involved in these fascinating disorders; ultimately it may be possible to reactivate imprinted gene expression as a therapeutic approach.