Activity of the tick Ixodes ricinus monitored in a suburban park in Brno,Czech Republic,in association with the evaluation of selected repellents

The ever‐increasing number of Lyme borreliosis patients led us to consider more effective procedures for disease prevention. The aim of our study was to monitor the annual activity and infectivity of Ixodes ricinus ticks in the Pisárky region, City of Brno, CR, and to test the responses of the locally‐captured ticks to selected repellents. The result of regular one‐hour‐perweek monitoring in 2011 was the collection of ticks that directly reflected the highest number of Lyme disease patients (4,835) detected throughout the period of recording in the Czech Republic. The ticks were examined for spirochaetes by dark field microscopy. The positive samples were identified by PCR analysis, confirming that 76% of these were infected with Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. Ticks were most abundant in May and June, with August having the highest risk for spirochaetal infection. Tick activity was statistically correlated with temperature. The moving‐object‐bioassay was used to study repellent efficiency on the Ixodes ricinus nymphs captured in the above‐mentioned suburban park. Five selected commercial repellents based on DEET (N, N‐diethyl3methylbenzamide) showed statistically different effects on the non‐repellent control group.     

A novel test system for detection of tick repellents

A bioassay was developed to examine the response of ticks towards potential repellents that may protect vertebrates against tick bites. Such tick repellents must be effective despite the unavoidable presence of various attractive host-derived stimuli. Therefore, a moving-object-bioassay (MO-bioassay) was developed that mimicks body warmth and movement of vertebrates by a rotating and heated drum. Compounds which were tested for their effects on ticks were applied onto a small elevated area of the drum. Ticks were allowed to approach the drum by walking on a glass rod which ended 1 mm away from the local elevation. Ticks could cling to this elevation that intermittently passed by, whereas the remaining drum surface was too far away from the tip of the rod to be contacted by the ticks.Without the presence of any repellents, 85.5% of 600 hungry, field-collected Ixodes ricinus nymphs moved to the heated, rotating drum within 2 min. Further experiments with unfed I. ricinus nymphs were performed to test whether one established and two potential tick repellents elicit an avoidance reaction in the ticks despite the proven attractiveness of the drum. Freshly applied DEET (N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide) at a concentration of 0.11 mg cm^–2 proved active as a repellent in the MO-bioassay over a distance of a few mm as well as by direct contact. A similar repellent effect was observed with (–)-myrtenal at 1 mg cm^–2, but not at 0.1 mg cm^–2, indicating that this terpenaldehyde is a weaker repellent for I. ricinus nymphs than DEET. No repellent effect was observed with camphor (0.1 mg cm^–2).The MO-bioassay thus is a rapid, simple and low-cost test method allowing the investigation of tick host-contact behaviour as well as the screening of candidate repellents which are either perceived as volatiles or via contact chemoreception.     

三色迷彩油添加避蚊胺对白纹伊蚊驱避效果的实验室评价

参照中华人民共和国国家标准GB/T 17322.10-1998和《军队特需药品研发勤务技术指导原则(试行)》规定的测试方法,测试了避蚊胺和水溶性二氧化钛处理迷彩油(CFP)对白纹伊蚊Aedes albopictus的驱避效果,为研发我军专用的防蚊虫迷彩油提供依据。结果表明:在3种颜色迷彩油中加入DEET后,不影响DEET的驱蚊效果;添加不同浓度DEET对蚊虫的驱避效果差异显著,20%DEET和25%DEET+迷彩油对白纹伊蚊的平均防护时间均达到或超过10 h,达到《军队特需药品研发勤务技术指导原则(试行)》规定的标准,15%DEET+迷彩油平均防护时间不足10 h,未达《军队特需药品研发勤务技术指导原则(试行)》规定的标准。研究表明:将适量DEET与迷彩油混合涂抹于皮肤可能作为演习或战时的伪装和防蚊的一种有效的综合保护措施。     

Decrease in DEET repellency caused by nitric oxide in Rhodnius prolixus

N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET) is widely used as an insect repellent; however, little is known about its mode of action. On the other hand, nitric oxide (NO) participates in the olfaction transduction pathway of insects. In this work, nitroso-acetyl-cysteine (SNAC), a nitric oxide donor, or dibutyril-cyclic-GMP (db-cGMP), the cyclic nucleotide analog, were applied on fifth instar nymphs of Rhodnius prolixus before exposing them to DEET, to obtain information about the possible role of NO/cGMP system in the olfaction process. In the first place, we exposed the nymphs to several DEET concentrations (70, 700, 1,750, and 3,500 microg/cm2). All these concentrations produced a repellent effect. A decrease in repellency during the course of the experiment was observed when the nymphs were exposed to high concentrations of DEET (700 and 1,750 microg/cm2), suggesting an adaptation phenomenon. The pre-treatment of the insects with 15 microg /insect of SNAC or 2 microg/insect of db-cGMP produced a reduction of the repellency. An increase in locomotor activity was observed in insects exposed to 350 or 700 microg/cm2 DEET. Although exposure to 70 microg/cm2 DEET produced a high repellency response, it did not modify the insects' locomotor activity. Insects treated with two doses of SNAC before being exposed to 350 microg/cm2 of DEET showed no differences in locomotor activity compared to controls.     

High‐throughput screening method for evaluating spatial repellency and vapour toxicity to mosquitoes

Spatial repellents are an essential tool for personal protection against mosquitoes that bite and transmit disease pathogens to humans. Current repellent screening methods, such as olfactometers and alternative choice tests, are complex systems that require a relatively large quantity of compound (mg). The present study validates a high‐throughput spatial repellent screening method using a glass tube that has the ends covered with netting, in addition to treated filters and plastic end caps. The apparatus occupies relatively little space, is easy to decontaminate, and requires small amounts of compound (μg). In a horizontal tube orientation, DEET (N,N‐diethyl‐meta‐toluamide), citronella oil and IR3535 had 1 h half repellent concentration (EC₅₀) values of 32, 32 and 298 μg/cm², respectively, against the Orlando strain of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae). Vertical tube orientation increased EC₅₀ values by approximately two‐fold, except IR3535, which remained essentially unchanged. Transfluthrin showed concentration‐dependent spatial repellency (1 h EC₅₀ = 0.5 μg/cm²) without any knockdown, although only in vertical tubes. Transfluthrin showed 50% knockdown in 1 h at 0.5 μg/cm² and 50% mortality at 0.15 μg/cm² in horizontal tubes. In conclusion, this high‐throughput screening method is useful for assessing vapour toxicity and the spatial repellency of candidate molecules prior to semi‐field and field studies.     

Chemically induced behavioral responses in Anopheles minimus and Anopheles harrisoni in Thailand

Behavioral responses of female mosquitoes representing two species in the Minimus Complex exposed to an operational field dose of bifenthrin or DEET (N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide) were described using an excito-repellency test system. Two test populations of An. minimus, one from the field (Tak Province, western Thailand), the other from a long-established laboratory colony, and Anopheles harrisoni collected from Kanchanaburi Province, western Thailand, were used. Results showed that all test populations rapidly escaped after direct contact with surfaces treated with either bifenthrin or DEET compared to match-paired untreated controls. Greater escape response by exposed females to bifenthrin and DEET were observed in the An. minimus colony compared to the two field populations. Field-collected An. minimus demonstrated a more rapid escape response to DEET than to bifenthrin, whereas An. harrisoni showed a converse response. Although fewer females escaped from test chambers without direct contact with treated surfaces compared to contact tests, the spatial repellency response was significantly pronounced in all test populations compared to match-paired controls (P < 0.05). DEET was found to perform as both a contact stimulant and moderate spatial repellent.     

Novel field assays and the comparative repellency of BioUD(®) , DEET and permethrin against Amblyomma americanum

Two new field bioassay methods were developed to compare the repellent activity of BioUD^® (containing 7.75% 2‐undecanone), 98.1% DEET and 0.5% permethrin against natural populations of nymphal Amblyomma americanum (L.) (Acari: Ixodidae). In a cloth sheet assay, pieces of material measuring 41 × 58 cm, separately treated with one of the test materials or the appropriate solvent carrier, were placed at random on the ground and baited with dry ice for 1 h. Mean numbers of ticks on repellent‐treated sheets were significantly lower than on control sheets. There was no significant difference in the number of ticks collected between sheets treated with BioUD^® and those treated with DEET. However, significantly fewer ticks were found on sheets treated with BioUD^® or DEET than on permethrin‐treated sheets. In a sock test, over‐the‐calf tube socks were treated with one of the test materials or the appropriate solvent carrier. Human volunteers wore a repellent‐treated and a corresponding carrier‐treated sock on either leg and walked randomly over an area of approximately 4000 m² for 15 min. Significantly fewer ticks were collected from socks treated with BioUD^® or DEET than from socks treated with the carrier and there was no significant difference in repellency between these two agents. No difference in the mean number of ticks collected was found between permethrin‐treated and corresponding carrier‐treated socks. To examine the mechanism of repellency of BioUD^®, a four‐choice olfactometer was used to assess spatial repellency against adult A. americanum. As expected in the absence of a repellent, when all choices were represented by water‐treated filter paper, ticks were equally distributed among the choices. When one choice consisted of BioUD^®‐treated filter paper and the remaining choices of water‐treated paper, the distribution of ticks on the repellent‐treated paper was significantly lower than might be expected to occur by chance, suggesting that repellency is at least partly achieved by an olfactory mechanism.     

Efficacy of the new repellent BioUD<Superscript>®</Superscript> against three species of ixodid ticks

BioUD ^® with the active ingredient 2-undecanone originally derived from wild tomato plants is a new repellent recently registered by the US EPA. Repellent efficacy of BioUD ^® (7.75% 2-undecanone) and DEET (98.11%) was examined in the laboratory using a choice test between repellent-treated and control filter paper surfaces for Amblyomma americanum, Dermacentor variabilis, and Ixodes scapularis. BioUD ^® provided greater repellency against A. americanum and I. scapularis than DEET. No difference was found between BioUD ^® and DEET against D. variabilis. In head-to-head assays between BioUD ^® and DEET, undiluted and 50% dilutions of BioUD^® were more repellent than undiluted DEET against all three species tested. Similarly, a 25% dilution of BioUD^® was more repellent than DEET against A. americanum while no difference in mean percentage repellency was found between a 25% dilution of BioUD^® and DEET against I. scapularis. Based on regression analysis, the concentration of BioUD^® required for equivalent repellency to 98.11% DEET was 39.5% for D. variabilis and 29.7% for I. scapularis. A log-probit model could not be constructed for A. americanum from the dosages tested. Based on filter paper head-to-head assays, BioUD^® is at least 2–4 times more active as a repellent than DEET against three species of ixodid ticks under the conditions of our laboratory bioassays.     

The mysterious multi-modal repellency of DEET

DEET is the most effective insect repellent available and has been widely used for more than half a century. Here, I review what is known about the olfactory and contact mechanisms of DEET repellency. For mosquitoes, DEET has at least two molecular targets: Odorant Receptors (ORs) mediate the effect of DEET at a distance, while unknown chemoreceptors mediate repellency upon contact. Additionally, the ionotropic receptor Ir40a has recently been identified as a putative DEET chemosensor in Drosophila. The mechanism of how DEET manipulates these molecular targets to induce insect avoidance in the vapor phase is also contested. Two hypotheses are the most likely: DEET activates an innate olfactory neural circuit leading to avoidance of hosts (smell and avoid hypothesis) or DEET has no behavioral effect on its own, but instead acts cooperatively with host odors to drive repellency (confusant hypothesis). Resolving this mystery will inform the search for a new generation of insect repellents.