Effects of Abscisic Acid on the Growth Pattern of the Shoot Apical Meristem and on Flowering in Chenopodium rubrum L.

Abscisic acid (ABA) at 1 x 10^–4 M or 3 x 10^–4 Mwas applied to the apical buds of Chenopodium rubrum plantsexposed to different photoperiodic treatments and showing differentpatterns of floral differentiation. Stimulation of growth inwidth of the apical meristem of the shoot and/or inhibitionof growth in length was obtained under all photoperiodic treatments.This change of growth pattern was followed by different effectson flowering. In non-induced plants grown under continuous light ABA stimulatedpericlinal divisions in the peripheral zone and the initiationof leaves as well as the growth in width of bud primordia. Inplants induced by two short days reduced growth of the meristemcoincided with ABA application. Longitudinal growth of the meristemwas inhibited in this case and only a temporary stimulationof inflorescence formation took place. In plants induced ata very early stage, ABA exerted a strong inhibitory effect onflowering. A permanent and reproducible stimulatory effect onflowering was obtained in plants induced by three sub-criticalphotoperiodic cycles if ABA was applied to apices released fromapical dominance. In this case formation of lateral organs andinternodes was promoted by ABA and was followed by stimulatedinflorescence formation. Gibberellic acid (GA2) at 1x 10^–4M or 3 x 10^–4 M brought about a similar effect on floweringas ABA, although the primary growth effect was different, i.e.GA₂ stimulated longitudinal growth. The effects of ABA and GA₂ on floral differentiation have beencompared with earlier results obtained from auxin and kinetinapplications. These growth hormones are believed to regulateflowering by changing cellular growth within the shoot apex.Depending on the actual state of the meristem identical growthresponses may result in different patterns of organogenesisand even in opposite effects on flowering. Shoot apex, flowering, photoperiodic induction, abscisic acid, gibberellic acid, Chenopodium rubrum L.     

The Growth of the Shoot Apex of Chenopodium rubrum L. Treated with a Florigenic Extract from Flowering Tobacco Plants: Preliminary Anatomical Observations

Anatomical changes in the shoot apex of Chenopodium rubrum L.treated with an extract from flowering tobacco plants and cultivatedin non-inductive conditions are described. They are comparedwith the anatomy of non-treated vegetative apices and with apicesof plants induced with a short day. Treatment with the extractresulted in both activation of cell division in the upper partof the apex and in apex elongation. Acceleration of leaf primordiainitiation and stimulation of branching took place. The effectcorresponds to the sequence of changes in photoperiodically-inducedplants but is more pronounced. Elongation following 10^–4M GA₃ treatment was of a differentnature; there was only a slight stimulation in the upper partof the apex in contrast with a strong stimulation of growthin length in the lower internodes. These preliminary resultssuggest a similarity between apical changes evoked by a stimulusproduced by short days and an exogenously applied floral stimulus.The changes differed from those caused by exogenous phytohormones. Key words: Chenopodium rubrum, florigen, shoot apex     

Effects of Indol-3yl acetic Acid on Floral Induction and Apical Differentiation in Chenopodium rubrum L.

Indol-3yl acetic acid (10^–4M) was applied to the plumulesof Chenopodium rubrum. Effects on the anatomical structure andthe growth pattern in the apical meristem, as well as DNA synthesisand nucleolus size were investigated. When auxin is applied before or during photoperiodic inductionit inhibits DNA synthesis and meristematic activity. The axillarymeristem (i.e. a group of cells in the axils of the leaf primordia)is most affected. A similar inhibition of the axillary meristemwas also observed in non-induced control plants grown in continuouslight. Auxin applied simultaneously with photoperiodic inductioncounteracts the reduction of apical dominance in the apex andthus inhibits the onset of floral differentiation. Auxin appliedfollowing induction inhibits the previously-formed buds andmakes possible a more complete development of the apical flower. The dual effect of IAA on flowering, inhibitory and stimulatory,manifests itself as a growth response at different stages ofthe changing shoot apex.     

The Negative Response of Photoperiodic Floral Induction in Chenopodium rubrum L. to Preceding Growth

In Chenopodium rubrum there exists a correlation between theage of the seedlings and the effectiveness of photoperiodicinduction. The younger the plants the more effective was photoperiodictreatment. In three-day-old seedlings one short day was sufficientto promote incomplete flowering, while two short days broughtabout 100 per cent flowering. With six-, eight-, and ten-day-oldplants exposed to two or three short days quantitative differenceswere observed in the earliness of flowering and the percentageof flowering plants. The effects of continuous light and ofshort days with a light break preceding the inductive treatmentwere compared. The results obtained indicate that the inhibitoryeffect of plant age cannot be attributed solely to the appearanceof inhibitors under continuous light but changes of growth patternin plants of different age should also be taken into consideration. The inhibition of RNA synthesis in shoot apices brought aboutby 6-azauridine resulted also in a flowering stimulation, providedthat the inhibitor was applied one or two days prior to inductionand the inductive process itself remained undisturbed. Thisstimulation was accompanied by inhibition of vegetative growthand by a decrease of RNA concentration in the cytoplasm as estimatedcytophotometrically. The competition between growth of vegetative organs and floraldifferentiation affects the response to inductive treatment.The suppression of growth can result in enhancement of flowering.     

Treatments that Enhance Flowering in the Post-inductive Period of a Short-day Plant, Chenopodium rubrum L.

Flowering was promoted in young plants of Chenopodium rubrumL. by application of growth inhibitors such as 5-fluorodeoxyuridine(FUDR) and (2-chloroethyl) trimethylammonium chloride (CCC),growth substances (indol-3yl-acetic acid, IAA), by the removalof roots and by drought. All the treatments were effective onlyduring the post-inductive period and at the threshold levelof photoperiodic induction. The response of plants was strictlytime-dependent. The experimental data indicate that the stimulationof flowering is usually accompanied by inhibition of leaf initiationand growth. The treatments probably produced variation in thequantitative expression of flowering by causing a shift in emphasisin the development of leaf and bud primordia at the shoot apex.The dynamic analysis of differentiation of the shoot apex indicatesa correlation between the morphological stage of the shoot apexand its responsiveness to the treatments.     

Effects of Kinetin on Growth of the Apical Meristem and Floral Differentiation in Chenopodium rubrum L.

Kinetin (1•10^–4 M and 1•10^–3 M) was appliedto the plumules of 6-day-old Chenopodium rubrum plants. Effectson growth, anatomical structure and organogenesis in the apicalmeristem were followed. Floral differentiation as affected bykinetin was also investigated in plants induced to flower byshort-day treatment. Kinetin increased mitotic activity in the apical meristems inboth induced and non-induced plants. The effect was most pronouncedin the peripheral and subcentral zone. An increase in nucleolussize and a higher degree of pyroninophilia in the peripheralzone was also observed, indicating a localized promotion ofRNA synthesis. A higher rate of leaf initiation and a stimulationof leaf and stem growth was subse quentiy recorded. The growthof axillary meristems and of bud primordia was promoted onlyat the lower concentration of kinetin (1•^10–4 M),in both photoperiodically-induced and non-induced plants. However,the pattern of lateral bud growth differed from that found innormal floral differentiation. In kinetintreated plants, thebud primordia are isolated from the summit of the shoot apexby a succession of rapidly growing leaves. The enhancement ofleaf growth leads to correlative inhibition of axillary budpriniordia and results, finally, in a suppression of floraldifferentiation. The inhibitory effect of kinetin on floweringwas compared with that of auxin. Inhibition of flowering occurredin both cases but is achieved in two different ways.