光周期对雄性布氏田鼠种内个体气味辨别的影响

本文研究了成年雄性布氏田鼠对不同光照周期下(长光照: LD; 短光照: SD) 的陌生雌鼠和陌生雄鼠气味的行为表现。实验发现: 所有被试雄鼠对LD 雄鼠、雌鼠气味比SD 雄鼠、雌鼠气味有更多的社会探究行为。LD 雄鼠比SD 雄鼠对同性或异性陌生个体气味的嗅闻和挖掘行为要多, 而且差异显著。在探究LD 动情雌鼠气味源时, LD 雄鼠比SD 雄鼠表现出更多的嗅闻和挖掘行为; 在探究SD 动情雌鼠气味源时, LD 和SD 雄鼠的行为反应没有明显差别。所有被试雄鼠在LD 雄鼠气味源箱中的停留时间都显著多于在SD 雄鼠气味源箱中的停留时间。LD 雄鼠在LD 雌鼠气味源箱中的停留时间显著多于在SD 雌鼠气味源箱中的停留时间; 而SD 雄鼠在LD 和SD 雌鼠气味源箱中的进入频次和停留时间没有明显差别。同时, LD 雄鼠对LD 动情雌鼠的气味在嗅闻频次和嗅闻时间上多于非动情LD 雌鼠, 而对SD 动情和非动情雌鼠的气味没有表现出明显的偏好; SD 雄鼠对LD 和SD 动情雌鼠的嗅闻行为仅在频次上显著多于对非动情雌鼠的嗅闻, 而在时间上没有显著差别。结果表明: 布氏田鼠嗅觉通讯中的个体气味及其对气味进行辨别过程中的行为反应都随着光照周期的不同而发生变化。动物的个体气味带有季节性信息, 来源于长光照下的气味比短光照下的气味更具有性吸引; 短光照在一定程度上可能抑制了雌鼠的动情和雄鼠的性行为反应。其嗅觉通讯行为的适应意义可能在于: 减少秋季短日照环境下的繁殖活动, 提高雄性个体之间的社会容忍性以利于集群越冬。     

雌性布氏田鼠对雄鼠气味的辨别

通过雌性布氏田导其配偶和陌生雄鼠气味的辨别实验,以及无交配经历的成年雌鼠对社会等级不同的陌生雄鼠气的辨别实验发现,有生育经历的雌鼠对陌生雄鼠气味的探究行为明显多于对配偶气味的控究,但雌鼠在配偶雄鼠气味周围的停留时间、自身修饰行为和何处行为的发生频次和持续地陌生雄鼠,没有交配经历的雌鼠对处于从鼠地位的雄性个体气味探究行为多于对优势雄性的控究,而其他行为表现没有明显差异。表明,雌性布氏田鼠可以利用气味     

棕色田鼠探究行为对同种个体气味源反应格局的分析

通过观察非动情期的棕色田鼠对麻醉的同种个体身体气味源的探究行为 ,包括雄鼠对麻醉雄鼠和雌鼠的嗅闻、雌鼠对麻醉雄鼠和雌鼠的嗅闻 ,分析了棕色田鼠在社会探究中对不同气味源的反应格局。结果表明 ,棕色田鼠对同种个体肛殖区和面部的嗅闻频次及嗅闻持续时间最多 (P <0 0 5 ) ;对背部、腹部、肋部嗅闻的频次和持续时间较少。在对同一部位的嗅闻中 ,在嗅闻频次上 ,雄鼠对雄鼠的嗅闻、雌鼠对雌鼠的嗅闻以及雌鼠对雄鼠的嗅闻都显著多于雄鼠对雌鼠的嗅闻 (P <0 0 5 ) ;在嗅闻时间上 ,性别组合对同一部位的探究行为没有显著影响 ,但气味源与性别组合有交互作用 (P <0 0 5 ) ,影响探究行为。这些结果说明棕色田鼠的肛殖区和面部是重要的气味源 ,而且在对同一气味源的探究中存在性别差异。但在非动情期 ,异性间的探究并不总是高于同性间的探究     

布氏田鼠在不同光周期下对陌生个体尿液和粪便的气味辨别

研究了成年布氏田鼠在10min内,对不同光照周期下（长光照：LD;短光照：SD）陌生雌／雄个体尿液和粪便两种单一个体气味源的气味行为反应,实验发现：所有雌雄被试鼠对LD气味源比SD气味源表现出更多的嗅闻行为。LD和SD被试鼠对同性／异性尿液气味的嗅闻行为没有表现出明显的差别,但LD被试雄鼠对陌生雌鼠粪便的嗅闻频次显多于SD被试雄鼠,从嗅闻行为特征量（嗅闻行为占所有行为的百分比）来看,所有LD和SD被试雌,雄鼠对尿液的嗅 明显多于粪便,除SD粪便气味外,被试鼠对异性气味源的嗅闻明显多于同性,实验结果表明：作为两种个体气味源,尿液和粪便都带有季节性信息,而且是具有性别特性的。异性的个体气味源比同性的个体气味源更具吸引力;长光照动物的个体气味比短光照动物的气味更具吸引力。     

雄性等级对布氏田鼠雌性选择的影响

利用监控录像以及特定行为记录的方法,研究了雄性等级对布氏田鼠气味选择和个体选择的影响。结果表明不论是气味选择还是个体选择,雌鼠动情状态不影响对雄鼠的选择频次,但是动情雌鼠在自我修饰行为频次上高于非动情雌鼠。此外,在气味和个体选择的优先权方面,动情雌鼠更多的优先选择优势雄鼠的气味和个体并与之交配,而非动情雌鼠更多的先选择从属雄鼠的气味和个体。总之,不论是气味选择还是个体选择,布氏田鼠不仅受到被选择雄鼠的地位影响,还与雌鼠的生理状态有关。     

雌性布氏田鼠对不同共居时间雄性气味的识别与记忆

啮齿动物的社会识别包括对化学信号的辨别、学习和记忆。田鼠属动物雌雄成年个体共居一定时间后,可以利用气味信号来识别配偶。本研究将成年雌雄布氏田鼠配对饲养12 h、18 h、24 h,确认发生交配行为形成配对关系后,分开单独饲养6 h,取配偶雄鼠和陌生雄鼠巢垫物作为个体气味,在气味选择箱中观察雌鼠对配偶雄鼠和陌生雄鼠气味信号的探究和选择行为,从而探讨不同共居时间雌性布氏田鼠对配偶气味信号的识别与记忆的影响。研究结果表明:共居时间影响雌性布氏田鼠对配偶气味的识别与记忆;共居时间越长,雌鼠在气味探究和选择时间上对配偶气味偏好越明显;共居24 h 后,雌性布氏田鼠能够识别出配偶雄鼠的气味信号并形成记忆,这样的记忆维持时间至少是6 h。     

成年布氏田鼠对个体气味信号的识别与记忆

将配对饲养的成年雌雄布氏田鼠分离, 通过分开单独饲养12 h , 1 d、2 d、3 d、5 d 和7 d 后雌、雄鼠对原配偶异性和陌生异性气味信号的选择实验, 探讨布氏田鼠对气味信号的识别和记忆。实验表明: 在分离12 h 和1 d 后, 雄鼠对陌生雌性气味的选择和探究行为显著多于对熟悉雌鼠气味, 而雌鼠对两种气味并未表现显著的探究差异; 布氏田鼠对气味信号的记忆维持的强度和时间随个体不同而产生差异, 雄鼠在分离后12 h、1d、2 d 中对陌生雌鼠气味均表现出差异明显的探究行为, 而后, 各项探究行为的差异均不明显。雌鼠探究行为变化比较缓慢。据此推测雄鼠对气味的记忆维持在2 d 左右。     

雌性根田鼠断奶后对亲本尿气味的记忆

为研究亲子分开后雌性根田鼠对亲本气味的记忆持续时间，分别在未分开（20日龄）、分开10 d（30日龄）、20 d（40日龄）、30 d（50日龄）、40 d（60日龄）时，以新鲜尿作气味源，在行为观察箱中记录雌性根田鼠对不同气味源的行为响应模式，结果表明：(1) 未分开时，雌鼠遭遇父本气味时自我修饰的频次极显著高于陌生雄鼠气味，在分开10 d时，雌鼠接近父本气味的频次显著多于接近陌生雄鼠气味的频次，其对前者反标记显著少于后者；(2)分开20 d后，雌鼠对父本和陌生雄鼠气味的行为响应无明显差异；(3) 未分窝时，雌性根田鼠幼仔对母本和陌生雌鼠气味的行为响应无差异；（4）分开10—40 d时，雌性根田鼠对母本和陌生雌鼠气味表现出不同的行为响应模式。以上结果表明，在亲子分开10 d时，雌鼠仍能识别父本和陌生雄鼠的气味；分开20 d后，雌鼠不再能够识别父本和陌生雄鼠的气味；在亲子分开40 d时，雌鼠仍能识别母本和陌生雌鼠的气味。因此，雌鼠对父本气味的嗅觉记忆时间可以持续到亲子分开10—20 d之间；而对母本气味的嗅觉记忆时间则可以持续到亲子分开40 d以上。     

雌性根田鼠断奶后对亲本尿气味的记忆

为研究亲子分开后雌性根田鼠对亲本气味的记忆持续时间,分别在未分开(20日龄)、分开10d(30日龄)、20d(40日龄)、30d(50日龄)、40d(60日龄)时,以新鲜尿作气味源,在行为观察箱中记录雌性根田鼠对不同气味源的行为响应模式,结果表明(1)未分开时,雌鼠遭遇父本气味时自我修饰的频次极显著高于陌生雄鼠气味,在分开10d时,雌鼠接近父本气味的频次显著多于接近陌生雄鼠气味的频次,其对前者反标记显著少于后者;(2)分开20d后,雌鼠对父本和陌生雄鼠气味的行为响应无明显差异;(3)未分窝时,雌性根田鼠幼仔对母本和陌生雌鼠气味的行为响应无差异;(4)分开10—40d时,雌性根田鼠对母本和陌生雌鼠气味表现出不同的行为响应模式。以上结果表明,在亲子分开10d时,雌鼠仍能识别父本和陌生雄鼠的气味;分开20d后,雌鼠不再能够识别父本和陌生雄鼠的气味;在亲子分开40d时,雌鼠仍能识别母本和陌生雌鼠的气味。因此,雌鼠对父本气味的嗅觉记忆时间可以持续到亲子分开10—20d之间;而对母本气味的嗅觉记忆时间则可以持续到亲子分开40d以上。     

哺乳期棕色田鼠对配偶的识别记忆

观察了分娩后哺乳雌性棕色田鼠（Microtus mandarinus）与配偶分离7d、14d、21d后对配偶与陌生雄鼠的行为反应。结果发现,在频次和持续时间上,与配偶分离7d、14d、21d的雌鼠对配偶的攻击行为显著低于陌生雄鼠（P〈0．05）;对配偶的嗅闻及友善行为显著高于陌生雄鼠（P〈0．05）。处于哺乳前、中、后期不同阶段的雌鼠对陌生雄鼠攻击水平没有显著性差异（P〉0．05）。这些结果说明,在整个哺乳期,雌鼠能够识别配偶,对配偶的记忆不因分离时间的增加而减弱,而且对陌生鼠的攻击水平不会因哺乳阶段的变化而变化,维持高水平的攻击可能与其较强的母性行为有关。     

Ovarian hormones influence odor cues emitted by female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus.

During the spring-summer breeding season female meadow voles emit odors that are preferred by males, whereas in the autumn-winter season of reproductive quiescence females emit odors that are not preferred by males, but are attractive to females. The effects of daylength and ovarian hormones on salience of female odors were determined by assaying male responses to odors. Females housed in long and short photoperiods transmitted odors that elicited responses similar to those of spring and autumn female voles, respectively. The odor cues emitted by ovariectomized (OVX) females, irrespective of photoperiodic history, were similar to those generated by females during the nonbreeding season. In the absence of ovarian hormones, long daylengths were not sufficient to induce females to broadcast the spring odors preferred by males. Spring-type odor cues were, however, emitted by OVX voles housed in either photoperiod and treated with estradiol. Ovarian hormones appear necessary and sufficient to generate breeding season odor cues and sufficient to induce production of such cues during the nonbreeding season. We conclude that daylength affects odor cues emitted by females by altering ovarian hormone activity.     

不同社会等级雄性根田鼠对自身和同性陌生气味的辨别

采用两两遭遇法确定雄性根田鼠的社会等级,然后以新鲜尿作气味源,在行为选择箱中观察不同社会等级雄性根田鼠对自身气味和非自身气味的行为响应模式,结果表明:种群中从属个体对自身尿液存在明显偏好,其对自身尿液的接近潜伏期显著短于非自身尿液,而访问时间、自我修饰频次都显著高于非自身尿液;种群中优势个体则优先访问非自身尿液,其对非自身尿液的访问时间、嗅舔时间、自我修饰及反标记均显著高于自身尿液;对非自身尿液,不同社会等级雄性个体之间存在明显不同的行为反应模式。这说明,不同社会等级雄性根田鼠具有自我识别的能力且模式不同,同时其对非自身尿气味响应模式的差异也与自身的社会等级有关。     

Time course of androgenic modulation of odor preferences and odor cues in male meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus.

During the breeding season, male meadow voles prefer female over male odors and females prefer male over female odors. Testosterone control of males' odor preferences and production of odors attractive to females differ. A male meadow vole's preference for female versus male odor was still evident 1 week after castration, but not 1 week later. This preference was reinstated in testosterone-treated male voles 2 weeks after the onset of hormone replacement. The attractiveness of male odors to females did not disappear until 3 weeks after castration. The attractiveness of male odors was reinstated 1 week after castrated males were treated with testosterone. The time course for the androgenic modulation of production of odors attractive to females may facilitate breeding. For example, at the end of the breeding season males may emit an odor that is still attractive to females. Similarly, at the beginning of the breeding season males may emit an odor that is attractive to females.     

Seasonal differences in self-grooming in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus

We determined whether seasonal differences exist in the amount of time meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, self-groom when they encounter the scents of conspecifics. To do so, we used voles that were born and reared under long photoperiod (LP) and short photoperiod (SP). LP voles represent those found in free-living populations during the spring and summer breeding season, whereas SP voles characterize those found in free-living populations during the fall and winter nonbreeding season. Experiment 1 showed that LP male and female voles self-groomed more in response to odors of LP opposite-sex conspecifics as compared to those of other LP and SP conspecifics, suggesting that they may be self-grooming to signal sexual interest or excitement to potential mates. Experiment 2 demonstrated that SP males self-groomed more in response to scents of LP female voles and those of SP males as compared to scents of LP males and SP females, whereas SP females spent similar amounts of time self-grooming in response to scents of LP males, LP females, SP females, and SP males. These seasonal differences in self-grooming may reflect differences in the messages produced by groomers when they broadcast their odors as well as differences in the meaning of such odors to opposite-sex conspecifics. Alternatively, these data may be associated with seasonal differences in sexual motivation of the groomers when exposed to scents of particular conspecifics.     

Persistence of the Attractiveness of Two Sex-specific Scents in Meadow Voles,Microtus pennsylvanicus

The function of an odour may be reflected in its fade-out time in the environment. In this study, we investigated fade-out times of two specific odours, the anogenital area scent and that of the posterolateral region. These two odours support opposite-sex preferences in male and female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, but convey nonidentical information to conspecifics during the breeding season. The first experiment tested whether meadow voles respond preferentially to scents that were aged for 15 min (fresh) to 30 d. Males preferred female anogenital area scent to male anogenital area scent if both scents were ≤ 10 d old. By comparison, females preferred male anogenital area scent to female anogenital area scent if the scents were ≤ 25 d old. However, male and female voles preferred the posterolateral scent of males to that of females if the scents were ≤ 1 d old. Thus, fade-out times for these two scents differ for males and females, suggesting different functions. In the second experiment, male and female voles preferred fresh anogenital area scent and fresh posterolateral region scent compared with those same scents that were older. This result suggests that older scents may have lost information over time about the sex of the donor. Overall, data from both experiments indicate that voles may use specific scents for communication in different social contexts.     

Seasonal Changes in Scents and Responses to them in Meadow Voles: Evidence for the Co-evolution of Signals and Response Mechanisms

Relatively little is known about the mechanisms of communication during the non-breeding season in species that are seasonal breeders. Previous work with meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, housed under long photoperiods, has shown that they prefer the odors of opposite-sex conspecifics. In this paper, we investigated the effects of short photoperiod on preferences for sex-specific odors and the production of such odors. Short-photoperiod females preferred anogenital and fecal scents of other short-photoperiod females over those of males, but did not show sexual preferences for three other scents. Short-photoperiod males did not exhibit sexual preferences for any of the odors. Furthermore, scents from short-photoperiod voles did not elicit sex-specific preferences in long-photoperiod voles, and scents from long-photoperiod voles did not elicit preferences from short-photoperiod voles. These and previous results indicate that both the odors and responses to odors change seasonally and that long-photoperiod voles respond selectively to scents from long-photoperiod voles and short-photoperiod voles respond selectively to scents from short-photoperiod voles. Taken together, these results suggest the co-evolution of seasonal changes in scents and in perceptual or other response mechanisms.