丙型肝炎病毒分片段抗体检测蛋白质芯片质控参比品的建立及质量验证

建立能同时检测丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)嵌合抗体、核心抗体和NS3、NS4、NS5抗体的蛋白质芯片质控参比品,对质控合格的芯片进行质量验证。用3种HCV EIA试剂分别检测从3家医院收集的丙型肝炎病毒感染患血清及其他非HCV感染患血清,从3种EIA试剂同时阴性或阳性的血样中挑取阳性和阴性血清,然后用RNA hyb PCR试剂进行检测,从中再选取部分样本用RIBA3．0进行检测,确定HCV分片段抗体检测蛋白质芯片质控参比品。经质检合格的芯片用中国药品生物制品检定所的HCV参比品进行检定。通过490例临床标本的检测对芯片的质量进行进一步的验证。从收集的240份丙型肝炎病毒感染患血清及其他非HCV感染患血清筛选出30份血样(15份阳性,15份阴性)作为HCV分片段抗体检测蛋白芯片质控参比品。中国药品生物制品检定所的80份HCV参比品检定结果表明,混合抗体阳性检出率为39／40,阴性符合率为40／40,总符合率为98．7％;核心抗体阳性检出率为27／40,阴性符合率为40／40;NS3抗体阳性检出率为26／40,阴性符合率为39／40;NS4抗体阳性检出率为19／40,阴性符合率为40／40;NS5抗体阳性检出率2／40,阴性符合率为40／40。490例临床标本的检测结果表明,对于194例HCV阳性标本,蛋白质芯片混合抗体与ELISA的符合率达99．5％,分片段抗体符合率达97．4％,两种方法检测结果不符的标本经RIBA试剂确认,蛋白质芯片与RIBA试剂的符合率高度一致。对于296例各种HCV抗体阴性标本,蛋白质芯片检测结果全部为阴性。以上结果表明,制备的丙型肝炎病毒分片段抗体检测蛋白质芯片质控参比品可用于芯片生产的质量控制,经质控合格的芯片符合国家标准的要求,可用于临床检测。     

四种丙型肝炎病毒抗体试剂检测方法的性能评估

对血液筛查的四种丙型肝炎病毒(Hepatitis C virus,HCV)抗体试剂检测方法的性能进行评估。方法采用协作标定方式,应用四种检测方法(间接ELISA法、双抗原夹心ELISA法、间接CLIA法、双抗原夹心CLIA法)16种HCV抗体试剂,对经确证筛选出的70份(HCV抗体阳性35份、阴性35份)血浆样本进行检测,通过分析阳性、阴性符合率,评估四种方法 HCV抗体试剂的性能。结果间接ELISA法试剂检测阳性符合率为88.6%(31/35)~94.3%(33/35),双抗原夹心ELISA法、间接CLIA法、双抗原夹心CLIA法试剂检测阳性符合率为91.4%(32/35)~94.3%(33/35),四种检测方法 HCV抗体试剂阳性符合率之间的差异无统计学意义(P0.05);间接ELISA法和间接CLIA法试剂弱阳性样本检出率为11.4%(4/35)~31.4%(11/35),双抗原夹心ELISA法和双抗原夹心CLIA法试剂弱阳性样本检出率为5.7%(2/35)~11.4%(4/35),四种检测方法 HCV抗体试剂对弱阳性样本的检出率之间的差异有统计学意义(P0.05);间接ELISA法试剂检测阴性符合率分别为94.3%(33/35)~100%(35/35),间接CLIA法试剂阴性符合率分别为94.3%(33/35)~97.1%(34/35),双抗原夹心ELISA法和双抗原夹心CLIA法试剂阴性符合率均为97.1%(34/35),四种检测方法 HCV抗体试剂阴性符合率之间的差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论四种检测方法 HCV抗体试剂的性能基本一致,不同方法各有优缺点,建议应用多种检测方法对弱阳性样本进行确认检测。     

同时检测血清中多种抗体的蛋白质微阵列研究

建立一种用蛋白质微阵列法可同时检测血清中艾滋病毒（HIV）, 丙型肝炎病毒（HCV）和梅毒螺旋体（TP）抗体的方法.将基因工程HIV、HCV和TP 3种融合抗原共价结合于固相载体玻片上,制成蛋白质微阵列,血清样本经稀释、加样、孵育、洗涤后,加上Cy3荧光标记二抗,洗涤,激光共聚扫描,将获得的图片用Bio-discover公司的Imagene专用分析软件进行分析,所获数据在经过自行编写的软件,根据Cutoff值自动生成判断结果.用此蛋白质微阵列系统检测了400例阴性血清,确定了Cutoff值,检测中国药品生物制品检定研究所的HIV, HCV和TP 3种参比品,并与3种ELISA试剂盒的结果进行了比较.蛋白质微阵列的艾滋病毒阳性和阴性符合率均为100%(20/20); 丙型肝炎病毒阳性和阴性符合率均为95%(38/40).梅毒螺旋体参比品阳性符合率为100%(10/10),阴性符合率为100%(20/20),蛋白质微阵列与三种ELISA试剂检测国家HIV、TP、HCV参比品（共150份血清样本）,结果具有高度的符合率.     

用国产重组抗原研制丙肝病毒抗体检测试剂

用克隆表达的丙型肝炎病毒核心蛋白及非结构 3区蛋白、非结构 4区蛋白和非结构 5区蛋白作为抗原 ,研制装配了第三代丙肝病毒抗体检测试剂。用该试剂检测国家第三代丙肝病毒抗体检测试剂标准血清 ,40份阴性血清全部符合 ,40份阳性血清出现 1份假阴性。分析探讨了各种影响试剂质量的因素     

鼠疫菌F1抗体/抗原酶联免疫诊断试剂盒的应用评价

目的对兰州生物制品研究所有限责任公司研制的鼠疫菌F1抗体酶联免疫诊断试剂盒和鼠疫菌F1抗原酶联免疫诊断试剂盒进行临床应用评价。方法采用双抗原/抗体夹心酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)、间接血球凝集试验(IHA)、胶体金免疫层析试验(GICA)3种方法的诊断试剂对比检测云南省地方病防治所中心实验室保藏的和现场采集的血清样品和脏器样品,对血清样品做鼠疫菌F1抗体检测,对脏器样品做鼠疫菌F1抗原检测。结果在358份血清样品中,ELISA试剂检出F1抗体阳性52份(14.52%),IHA试剂检出阳性37份(10.34%),GICA试剂检出阳性45份(12.57%)。ELISA与IHA试剂的符合率为95.23%,与GICA试剂的符合率为96.92%。经统计学χ2检验,ELISA试剂检出F1抗体阳性率高于IHA试剂(χ2=11.53,P=0.000 7),与GICA试剂检出的差异无统计学意义(χ2=3.27,P=0.070 4)。进一步分析滴度差值频数,ELISA试剂检测人血清的敏感性高于IHA试剂的样品占87.5%。在117份脏器样品中,3种试剂均检出F1抗原阳性15份(12.82%),符合率100%。滴度差值频数比较,ELISA试剂检测敏感性高于反向间接血球凝集试验(RIHA)试剂的样品为78.57%。结论兰州生物制品研究所有限责任公司研制的鼠疫菌F1抗体酶联免疫诊断试剂盒和鼠疫菌F1抗原酶联免疫诊断试剂盒性质特异,其敏感性优于IHA试剂盒和GICA试剂条,值得在鼠疫的监测和快速诊断中推广应用。     

啮齿类动物中汉坦病毒感染血清学和病原学检测方法比较研究

致病性汉坦病毒的宿主主要为啮齿类动物,其病毒感染状况是人间疫情发生的关键影响因素,可通过检测宿主动物标本中病毒基因组RNA、蛋白抗原及特异性抗体而进行监测。本研究利用367份鼠肺及鼠血标本,对双抗原夹心ELISA(ELISA)、实时荧光RT-PCR(RT-PCR)和免疫荧光(IFA)等三种分别检测抗体、核酸和抗原的方法进行比较评估。ELISA法检出抗体阳性鼠血标本46份,阳性率为12.53%;RT-PCR法检出病毒RNA阳性鼠肺标本28份,阳性率为7.63%;IFA检出抗原阳性鼠肺标本24份,阳性率为6.54%。宿主动物组织标本中检出汉坦病毒RNA和(或)结构蛋白抗原的标本,对应的血液标本中可检出病毒特异性抗体,100%(24/24)IFA检测阳性标本和89.3%(25/28)RT-PCR检测阳性标本对应血标本ELISA抗体检测阳性,反之亦然,检出抗体的标本基本包含了可检出抗原和RNA的标本。RT-PCR与IFA检测结果差异无显著性(χa2=0.64,P0.05),一致性检验Kappa系数为0.71,一致性高(Z=13.66,P0.05),首先对血标本开展基于ELISA的特异性抗体检测,可显著缩小RT-PCR或IFA法检测病毒RNA或抗原的范围(χb2=12.04,χc2=20.05,P0.05)。本研究为宿主动物汉坦病毒感染实验室监测方案优化提供了有益的依据。     

基因重组抗原检测梅毒螺旋体抗体研究

梅毒是一种传染性很强的性传播疾病,早期诊断是防止其传播及治疗的关键。采用基因重组的梅毒螺旋体P47和P15抗原对289份临床标本进行梅毒螺旋体抗体的检测,并与常规方法进行了比较,结果表明：重组抗原ELISA法具有较高的敏感性和特异性,并能对梅毒进行早期诊断,可以代替常规方法检测梅毒螺旋体抗体。186份现患和已治愈梅毒患者标本,重组抗原ELISA法、TPHA法和RPR法均为阳性;60份健康献血员标本,重组抗原ELISA法和TPHA法、RPR法均为阴性;17份与梅毒患者有性接触者的标本,重组抗原ELISA法有2份阳性,而TPHA法、RPR法均为阴性,1个月后复查这2份血清TPHA和RPR均为阳性;6份RPR和类风湿因子均为阳性的血清,重组抗原ELISA法和TPHA法均为阴性,;20份肝硬化患者血清,3种方法检测均为阴性。     

免疫渗滤法检测血液及尿液HIV抗体的应用评价

评价免疫渗滤法人类免疫缺陷病毒1+2型抗体诊断试剂盒检测人血浆和尿液样本的临床性能。采用对照试验研究,选取背景清晰的研究对象200例,采集同一研究对象的血浆和尿液样本,应用万泰生物药业公司生产的人类免疫缺陷病毒1+2型抗体诊断试剂盒作为考核试剂,法国生物梅里埃公司生产的人类免疫缺陷病毒抗体诊断试剂盒(ELISA法)作为参考试剂进行检测,考核试剂检测结果与参考试剂及研究对象背景进行比较分析。考核试剂检测血浆HIV抗体与参考试剂相比较,阳性符合率100.00%,阴性符合率100.00%,总符合率100.00%,Kappa值1.00,一致性强度为最强;考核试剂检测尿液HIV抗体与参考试剂检测结果相比较,阳性符合率68.29%,阴性符合率100.00%,总符合率87.00%,Kappa值0.72,一致性强度为高度。免疫渗滤法人类免疫缺陷病毒1+2型抗体诊断试剂盒对血浆、尿液样本检测性能优越,适合临床快速诊断。     

Dot-ELISA法检测血液及唾液HIV抗体的应用评价

评价人类免疫缺陷病毒1+2型抗体检测试剂盒(Dot-ELISA法)检测血清和唾液样本的临床性能。采用对照试验研究,选取背景清晰的研究对象200例,采集同一研究对象的血清和唾液样本,应用万泰生物药业公司生产的人类免疫缺陷病毒1+2型抗体检测试剂盒作为考核试剂,法国生物梅里埃公司生产的人类免疫缺陷病毒抗体诊断试剂盒(ELISA法)作为参考试剂,考核试剂检测结果与参考试剂及研究对象背景进行比较分析。考核试剂检测血清HIV抗体与参考试剂相比较,阳性符合率100%,阴性符合率100%,总符合率100%,Kappa值1.00,一致性为最强;考核试剂检测唾液HIV抗体与参考试剂检测结果相比较,阳性符合率98.78%,阴性符合率100%,总符合率99.50%,Kappa值0.99,一致性为最强。Dot-ELISA法人类免疫缺陷病毒1+2型抗体检测试剂盒对血清及唾液样本检测性能优越,适合HIV抗体快速筛查。     

EB病毒衣壳抗原IgM抗体检测试剂参考品的建立

目的 建立EB病毒衣壳抗原IgM抗体检测试剂国家参考品并制定质量标准。方法 收集并筛选EB病毒衣壳抗原IgM抗体阳性和阴性血浆样本,建立EB病毒衣壳抗原IgM抗体检测试剂国家参考品并进行均匀性和稳定性研究,经10个实验室的协助标定,确定参考品的质量标准。结果 建立的EB病毒衣壳抗原IgM抗体检测试剂国家参考品包括阳性参考品6份、阴性参考品10份、重复性参考品1份和检测限参考品3份。参考品均匀性变异系数(coefficient of variation,CV)为3.1%,满足行业标准CV≤15.0%的要求;2～8℃放置7 d、室温放置3 d和反复冻融3次对参考品均无影响。质量标准为：阳性符合率应≥4/6,阴性符合率应为10/10,重复性(2个浓度水平)的检测结果应均为阳性且CV均≤15.0%,检测限参考品L1应为阳性,L2～L3不作要求。结论 建立的EB病毒衣壳抗原IgM抗体检测试剂国家参考品可用于相关试剂研发的质量控制及评价。     

Construction, expression, purification and biotin labeling of a single recombinant multi-epitope antigen for double-antigen sandwich ELISA to detect hepatitis C virus antibody

Based on B cell epitope predictions, a recombinant antigen with multiple epitopes from four Hepatitis C Virus fragments (C, NS3, NS4 and NS5) were engineered. The recombinant gene was then highly expressed in E. coli. The non-modified and C-terminal-modified recombinant proteins were used for coating and biotin labeling, respectively, to establish the double-antigen sandwich ELISA. Ten positive reference samples confirmed by the CHIRON RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA kit were detected positive, Forty one plasma samples were positive among samples from 441 volunteers, which indicated that the recombinant antigen could readily react well with plasma HCV antibody. As critical reagents of double-antigen sandwich ELISA, the recombinant multi-epitope antigen and the C-terminal-modified and biotin-conjugated antigen show good antigenicity. In this study, we provide a simple approach to produce multiple epitopes within one recombinant protein in order to avoid the costly expression of less-effective pools of multiple proteins, which is the conventional strategy of diagnostic antigen production for HCV antibody detection.     

RT套式PCR检测血浆HCV RNA及与抗HCV检测的比较

应用微量血清热变性法提取核酸,逆转录套式聚合酶链反应(RT-nest PCR)检测血浆HCV RNA,并与抗HCV ELISA检测结果比较,对HCV RNA阳性标本进行HGV RNA的筛查.结果在32例抗HCV阳性和20例抗HCV阴性血浆中,HCV RNA分别检出18例和2例,总符合率为70%,20例HCV RNA阳性者中有2例合并感染HBV,1例合并感染HGV.证明血浆样本中抗HCV与HCV RNA间存在很大的相关性.     

应用基因重组抗原诊断丙型肝炎研究

丙型肝炎病毒(Hepatis C virus,HCV)感染者的血液中病毒含量极低,还没有适当的方法可以直接检测病毒。现在常用免疫学方法测定特异性抗体[1]或利用 PCR 技术检测病毒核酸。由于 HCV基因组变异高达33%,PCR检测易发生假阳性和假阴性。同时由于丙肝抗原高度的变异性[2],虽然目前ELISA方法应用广泛,但是单一的诊断抗原已不能满足临床要求,需要多价抗原联合应用作为诊断试剂。目前,在我国流行的丙型肝炎病毒主要是Ⅱ型和Ⅲ型,国外的丙型肝炎诊断试剂研制单位主要是以Ⅰ型为主[3],而且进口的丙型肝炎诊断试剂昂贵,不适合在我国大量使…     

丙肝病毒IgM抗体检测方法的初步研究

选择东燃公司的重组结构区和非结构区抗原建立的抗ＨＣＶ－ＩｇＭ检测方法,简便、快速、特异性强、重复性好、敏感性高。只在丙肝病人组检出而健康献血员均为阴性,与抗ＨＡＶ、ＨＢＶ的ＩｇＭ抗体无交叉反应,且排除了ＲＦ干扰和ＩｇＧ占位引起的假阳性和假阴性,适用于抗ＨＣＶ－ＩｇＭ的临床检测。对２４例丙肝病人的抗ＨＣＶ－ＩｇＭ检测结果显示,急性丙肝病人血清抗ＨＣＶ－ＩｇＭ检出率较高（７５％,６／８）,且随ＡＬＴ正常而消失或滴度下降。慢性病人抗ＨＣＶ－ＩｇＭ检出率为５６．３％（９／１６）,其中７例ＩｇＭ持续阳性者为慢性活动性丙肝,说明慢性病人抗ＨＣＶ－ＩｇＭ与疾病的活动性密切相关。结果提示抗ＨＣＶ－ＩｇＭ的检测在急性肝炎的诊断及慢性丙肝的预后和转归上具有临床意义。     

Low prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in Amerindians from Western Venezuela

Previous studies have not found hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Amerindians from Western Venezuela. A survey of 254 Bari and Yukpa natives aged 10-60 years (mean +/- SD age = 35 +/- 5.4 years) from four communities, two Bari and two Yukpa, in this area were studied to assess the prevalence of antibodies to HCV (anti-HCV) and HCV RNA among these indigenous populations. Serum samples were examined initially for anti-HCV by a four generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Reactive samples were then tested using a third generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-3). Viral RNA was investigated in all immunoblot-reactive samples by a nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. Six (2.3%) of 254 natives were positive by ELISA, one (2.2%) of these reactive samples were positive by RIBA, and four (1.5%) were indeterminate. Only two (0.8%) were positive by PCR, corresponding to 1 (2.1%) of 47 inhabitants of a Yukpa community and to 1 (2.2%) of 45 subjects of a Bari community. Iatrogenic is thought to play a role in acquisition of the infection. The findings indicate a HCV focus of low endemicity and are compatible with a low degree of exposures of the natives to the virus. Studies are necessary to assess the risk factors for infection in these Amerindians.     

Comparison of Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA With Two Anti-HCV Assays For the Detection of HCV Infection in Hospital Setting

In this study, we compared the performance of three serological assays (Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA, Innotest HCV Ab IV enzyme immunoassay—EIA, and Ortho HCV 3.0 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay—ELISA) for the detection of HCV infection. Ninety plasma samples were collected, representing 63 samples from groups at risk for acquiring HCV infection and 27 HCV RNA-positive samples. The results of Ortho HCV 3.0 ELISA, Innotest HCV Ab IV, and Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA were fully concordant for 27 HCV RNA-positive samples. Ortho HCV 3.0 ELISA test and Innotest HCV Ab IV also gave the same results for risk groups, while three samples were found to be reactive by Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA and were consequently found negative for HCV RNA. As two of the solely Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA-positive samples were also hepatitis B s antigen (HBsAg)-positive, neutralization of HBsAg was performed but no arguments for the HBsAg interference were observed. In conclusion, the non-specific reactive signal was observed, in three samples using Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA, to be negative by other serological assays, and observed to be negative in an HCV RNA assessment, a result that could not be attributed to the interference with HBsAg. In the context of diagnostic testing, no test for various HCV genotypes was observed to be superior to any other.     

A ribonuclease protection assay for the direct detection and quantitation of hepatitis C virus RNA

A ribonuclease protection assay (RPA) was developed for the direct detection and quantitation of HCV RNA in infected patients' sera or plasma using HCV [(32)P]RNA from the conserved 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) as a probe. We were able to directly detect the presence of HCV RNA by RPA in several infected patients' samples. The viremic status of HCV infected patients with indeterminate recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA II) was also determined by this assay. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was also performed on all these samples and were found to be positive with a concordance of 100% between the results of PCR and RPA. The RPA was able to detect approximately 1 pg of HCV RNA. A limited sequence heterogeneity among HCV isolates was also observed by this assay, suggesting that this may be a faster method of detecting heterogeneous HCV sequences in patients' samples. This simple and specific method could be used to quantitate HCV RNA in order to better determine viremia and follow the course of HCV infection especially when RIBA II results are indeterminate.     

肺炎支原体P1重组蛋白的提取纯化及应用研究

提取纯化肺炎支原体(Mycoplasma pneumoniae,Mp)P1重组蛋白,建立酶联免疫吸附实验(ELISA)的方法,协助临床肺炎支原体感染的诊断。以GST融合蛋白层析柱提取、纯化Mp P1重组蛋白做抗原,以全肺炎支原体菌体成分做抗原对照,建立间接ELISA实验方法,检测40份正常献血者血清标本和51份疑似MP感染临床血清标本的IgG抗体。重组蛋白经SDS-PAGE可见诱导表达的样品在分子量大约59 ku处有明显条带,经Western blotting可与肺炎支原体免疫血清发生反应。ELISA实验检测51份临床标本,由P1重组蛋白抗原检测阳性31份,阳性率为60.78%。Mp检测阳性20份,阳性率为39.22%。实验精确度检测阳性混合血清的变异系数(CV值)为5.40%,阴性混合血清变异系数为1.10%。用Mp P1重组蛋白抗原建立的ELISA检测方法,其敏感性高于全肺炎支原体抗原,可用于临床肺炎支原体感染的诊断。