灵长类动作理解的镜像神经机制研究进展

灵长类动作理解(understanding of actions)的神经机制是认知神经科学研究的重要内容,它的阐明对于揭示灵长类特有的一些高级认知行为的本质和过程具有重要意义。就灵长类动物而言,个体对其同类做出动作的识别以及理解是其一切社会行为的基础,但是迄今为止我们对其动作理解的神经机制还知之甚少。随着镜像神经元成为近年来国外认知神经科学与认知人类学研究的热点,人们通过神经生理学和脑成像等技术,陆续发现和证明了其在灵长类动作理解过程中的重要作用。本文综述了近年来关于灵长类动作理解的镜像神经机制的研究成果,介绍了镜像神经元在灵长类动作理解过程中的一些新认识及其在该能力进化和发育等方面的作用,并对当前一些实验中遗留的问题与灵长类动作理解领域的未来研究方向作了反思与展望。     

节肢动物生殖器官进化的假说

节肢动物生殖器官的多样性及种间差异现象是动物学研究的热点.进化生物学家先后提出锁钥(lock-and-key)假说、基因多效性(pleiotropy)假说和性选择(sexual selection)假说解释节肢动物生殖器官演化规律,其中锁钥假说曾被广泛接受,但目前支持性选择假说的证据较多.     

镜像神经元研究概况述评

镜像神经元是近来国外认知神经科学研究的热点,通过一系列最新的技术,人们确立了人体内存在镜像神经系统的观点。镜像神经系统在语言进化、动作识别与理解、行为模仿等方面都起着重要的作用。本文就镜像神经系统的研究做一概述。     

驯化有益假说研究进展

驯化有益假说(beneficial acclimation hypothesis,BAH)认为,生物表型的适应性变化会增强其在诱导这些变化产生的环境中的生理机能或适合度。该假说自提出以来,其合理性与普适性一直存在较大争议。本文解析了BAH的理论内涵,综述了BAH的主要正向支持性证据以及反向否定性证据,并对BAH验证存在的问题进行总结和展望。     

壳斗演化的假说及分子系统学和化石证据

壳斗作为壳斗科Fagaceae的重要特征, 其起源、演化和多样性形成长期以来为系统学家们所关注, 有众多的观点和假说。本文在综合这些假说的基础上, 结合分子系统学和大化石证据, 讨论了壳斗演化的规律。研究结果支持壳斗具枝性性质, 来源于二歧聚伞花序最外侧小枝的假说。在比较3个壳斗演化模型的基础上, 根据4种分子系统关系的一致性重建了壳斗的演化历史: 壳斗是单系起源; 水青冈属的2果4裂瓣壳斗是最早分化的壳斗类型, 三棱栎型壳斗是较晚分化的类型; 并支持具有内裂瓣的金鳞果类型壳斗可能与其他横切面为圆形的壳斗有较近的共同祖先。这一结果也得到了多个大化石证据的支持。壳斗科多个分子系统关系的一致性和壳斗化石证据共同证实了壳斗演化的规律是从开裂向裂瓣融合、逐步简化、多向发展; 支持开裂壳斗、坚果三角形、较小、具棱或狭翅是祖征, 融合壳斗、坚果圆形、较大、不具棱是衍征。这些结果为进一步探索壳斗科的演化历史和系统发育提供了新的证据。     

乙酰胆碱受体如何形成离子通道?

1983年Numa 等实验室报告,应用基因工程技术阐明了乙酰胆碱受体(AChR)四个亚单位的氨基酸序列。随之而来的问题是,这些亚单位如何组成跨膜的离子通道。对此曾有两种假说。第一种假说(三个实验室)认为,通道是不带电荷的,而是被亲水的侧链所覆盖,因此,水和离子可以自由通过;第二种假说(两个实验室)认为,通道是带电荷的,而且带阳电荷和阴电荷的段落交替出现。最新的证据认为后者是正确的。     

灵长类镜像神经系统研究的最新进展

近年来,镜像神经系统成为认知神经科学的研究热点.神经生理学和脑成像的相关研究表明,镜像神经系统以运动为基础,统一了动作观察和动作执行的神经机制,为理解他人动作提供了来自"内部"的支持.镜像神经系统为个体间的自然交流提供了神经基础,具有深远的进化意义.它不仅存在于灵长类,甚至在进化距离较远的物种(如沼雀和斑雀)中也有发现...     

人工神经网络处理器

正通过计算来实现识别、理解、推理、记忆、学习、联想等一系列认知任务,是计算机科学的一个核心问题,同时也是一个公认的难题.幸运的是,自然界已经提供了一个上述问题的参考答案,那就是由大量神经元组成的系统—大脑.自然而然地,科学家通过借鉴大脑中神经元的组织方式,提出了人工神经网络这样一种计算模型,来解决各种认知任务.人工神经网络是一类模仿生物神经网络而构建的计算机算法的总称,由若干人工神经元结点(以下简称"神经元")互联而成.神经元之间通过突触两两连     

神经元钙信号系统异常与阿尔茨海默病的“钙假说”

钙信号是细胞调节各项生命活动的重要机制。神经元通过胞外钙离子(calcium ion, Ca²⁺)内流、内质网Ca²⁺释放以及Ca²⁺释放介导的Ca²⁺内流等方式产生具有时空特异性的钙信号,用于调控多种生物学过程,例如动作电位的调节、神经递质的释放、轴突的生长以及突触可塑性等。神经元胞内Ca²⁺浓度因受到细胞精确调控而处于动态平衡之中。若钙信号失调导致平衡被打破,则会造成神经元功能异常甚至死亡。近年来多项研究表明,钙稳态失衡与神经退行性疾病,例如阿尔茨海默病等的产生和发展密切相关,由此发展出关于阿尔茨海默病的钙假说。该假说认为,神经元钙稳态调节机制的持续性改变是神经元功能失常、大脑产生慢性疾病的重要因素。阿尔茨海默病发生发展过程中,神经元胞浆钙水平异常增高,致使多种钙依赖性酶的活性异常,进而影响基因转录。虽然内质网钙稳态的变化目前仍存在一定的争议,但较为确定的是线粒体中存在着钙超载的现象,导致氧化磷酸化反应下调,活性氧的产量增加,进而引发细胞凋亡。本文主要介绍了神经元钙信号系统及其功能,简要梳理了阿尔茨海默病钙假说的相关研究,并对后续研究进行了展望。     

从新的古生物学及今生物学资料看羽毛的起源与早期演化(英文)

近年来关于羽毛和羽状皮肤衍生物的研究极大促进了我们对羽毛起源与早期演化的理解。结合最新的古生物学与今生物学资料,对一些保存了皮肤衍生物的非鸟恐龙标本进行观察研究,为这个重要的进化问题提供了新见解。推测羽毛的演化在鸟类起源之前就以下列顺序完成了5个主要的形态发生事件:1)丝状和管状结构的出现;2)羽囊及羽枝脊形成;3)羽轴的发生;4)羽平面的形成;5)羽状羽小支的产生。这些演化事件形成了多种曾存在于各类非鸟初龙类中的羽毛形态,但这些形态在鸟类演化过程中可能退化或丢失了;这些演化事件也产生了一些近似现代羽毛或者与现代羽毛完全相同的羽毛形态。非鸟恐龙身上的羽毛有一些现代羽毛具有的独特特征,但也有一些现生鸟羽没有的特征。尽管一些基于发育学资料建立的有关鸟类羽毛起源和早期演化的模型推测羽毛的起源是一个全新的演化事件,与爬行动物的鳞片无关,我们认为用来定义现代鸟羽的特征应该是逐步演化产生的,而不是突然出现。因此,对于羽毛演化而言,一个兼具逐步变化与完全创新的模型较为合理。从目前的证据推断,最早的羽毛既不是用来飞行也不是用来保暖,各种其他假说皆有可能,其中包括展示或者散热假说。展开整合性的研究有望为羽毛的起源问题提供更多思路。     

Tinbergen on mirror neurons

Fifty years ago, Niko Tinbergen defined the scope of behavioural biology with his four problems: causation, ontogeny, survival value and evolution. About 20 years ago, there was another highly significant development in behavioural biology—the discovery of mirror neurons (MNs). Here, I use Tinbergen''s original four problems (rather than the list that appears in textbooks) to highlight the differences between two prominent accounts of MNs, the genetic and associative accounts; to suggest that the latter provides the defeasible ‘best explanation’ for current data on the causation and ontogeny of MNs; and to argue that functional analysis, of the kind that Tinbergen identified somewhat misleadingly with studies of ‘survival value’, should be a high priority for future research. In this kind of functional analysis, system-level theories would assign MNs a small, but potentially important, role in the achievement of action understanding—or another social cognitive function—by a production line of interacting component processes. These theories would be tested by experimental intervention in human and non-human animal samples with carefully documented and controlled developmental histories.     

Homo imitans? Seven reasons why imitation couldn't possibly be associative

Many comparative and developmental psychologists believe that we are Homo imitans; humans are more skilled and prolific imitators than other animals, because we have a special, inborn ‘intermodal matching’ mechanism that integrates representations of others with representations of the self. In contrast, the associative sequence learning (ASL) model suggests that human infants learn to imitate using mechanisms that they share with other animals, and the rich resources provided by their sociocultural environments. This article answers seven objections to the ASL model: (i) it presents evidence that newborns do not imitate; (ii) argues that infants receive a plentiful supply of the kind of experience necessary for learning to imitate; (iii) suggests that neither infants nor adults can imitate elementally novel actions; (iv) explains why non-human animals have a limited capacity for imitation; (v) discusses the goal-directedness of imitation; (vi) presents evidence that improvement in imitation depends on visual feedback; and (vii) reflects on the view that associative theories steal ‘the soul of imitation’. The empirical success of the ASL model indicates that the mechanisms which make imitation possible, by aligning representations of self with representations of others, have been tweaked by cultural evolution, not built from scratch by genetic evolution.     

Group Size Predicts Social but Not Nonsocial Cognition in Lemurs

The social intelligence hypothesis suggests that living in large social networks was the primary selective pressure for the evolution of complex cognition in primates. This hypothesis is supported by comparative studies demonstrating a positive relationship between social group size and relative brain size across primates. However, the relationship between brain size and cognition remains equivocal. Moreover, there have been no experimental studies directly testing the association between group size and cognition across primates. We tested the social intelligence hypothesis by comparing 6 primate species (total N = 96) characterized by different group sizes on two cognitive tasks. Here, we show that a species’ typical social group size predicts performance on cognitive measures of social cognition, but not a nonsocial measure of inhibitory control. We also show that a species’ mean brain size (in absolute or relative terms) does not predict performance on either task in these species. These data provide evidence for a relationship between group size and social cognition in primates, and reveal the potential for cognitive evolution without concomitant changes in brain size. Furthermore our results underscore the need for more empirical studies of animal cognition, which have the power to reveal species differences in cognition not detectable by proxy variables, such as brain size.     

View-Invariant Visuomotor Processing in Computational Mirror Neuron System for Humanoid

Mirror neurons are visuo-motor neurons found in primates and thought to be significant for imitation learning. The proposition that mirror neurons result from associative learning while the neonate observes his own actions has received noteworthy empirical support. Self-exploration is regarded as a procedure by which infants become perceptually observant to their own body and engage in a perceptual communication with themselves. We assume that crude sense of self is the prerequisite for social interaction. However, the contribution of mirror neurons in encoding the perspective from which the motor acts of others are seen have not been addressed in relation to humanoid robots. In this paper we present a computational model for development of mirror neuron system for humanoid based on the hypothesis that infants acquire MNS by sensorimotor associative learning through self-exploration capable of sustaining early imitation skills. The purpose of our proposed model is to take into account the view-dependency of neurons as a probable outcome of the associative connectivity between motor and visual information. In our experiment, a humanoid robot stands in front of a mirror (represented through self-image using camera) in order to obtain the associative relationship between his own motor generated actions and his own visual body-image. In the learning process the network first forms mapping from each motor representation onto visual representation from the self-exploratory perspective. Afterwards, the representation of the motor commands is learned to be associated with all possible visual perspectives. The complete architecture was evaluated by simulation experiments performed on DARwIn-OP humanoid robot.     

Sociality, ecology, and relative brain size in lemurs

The social brain hypothesis proposes that haplorhine primates have evolved relatively large brains for their body size primarily as an adaptation for living in complex social groups. Studies that support this hypothesis have shown a strong relationship between relative brain size and group size in these taxa. Recent reports suggest that this pattern is unique to haplorhine primates; many nonprimate taxa do not show a relationship between group size and relative brain size. Rather, pairbonded social monogamy appears to be a better predictor of a large relative brain size in many nonprimate taxa. It has been suggested that haplorhine primates may have expanded the pairbonded relationship beyond simple dyads towards the evolution of complex social groups. We examined the relationship between group size, pairbonding, and relative brain size in a sample of 19 lemurs; strepsirrhine primates that last share a common ancestor with monkeys and apes approximately 75 Ma. First, we evaluated the social brain hypothesis, which predicts that species with larger social groups will have relatively larger brains. Secondly, we tested the pairbonded hypothesis, which predicts that species with a pairbonded social organization will have relatively larger brains than non-pairbonded species. We found no relationship between group size or pairbonding and relative brain size in lemurs. We conducted two further analyses to test for possible relationships between two nonsocial variables, activity pattern and diet, and relative brain size. Both diet and activity pattern are significantly associated with relative brain size in our sample. Specifically, frugivorous species have relatively larger brains than folivorous species, and cathemeral species have relatively larger brains than diurnal, but not nocturnal species. These findings highlight meaningful differences between Malagasy strepsirrhines and haplorhines, and between Malagasy strepsirrhines and nonprimate taxa, regarding the social and ecological factors associated with increases in relative brain size. The results suggest that factors such as foraging complexity and flexibility of activity patterns may have driven selection for increases in brain size in lemurs.     

Mirror neurons in the tree of life: mosaic evolution,plasticity and exaptation of sensorimotor matching responses

Considering the properties of mirror neurons (MNs) in terms of development and phylogeny, we offer a novel, unifying, and testable account of their evolution according to the available data and try to unify apparently discordant research, including the plasticity of MNs during development, their adaptive value and their phylogenetic relationships and continuity. We hypothesize that the MN system reflects a set of interrelated traits, each with an independent natural history due to unique selective pressures, and propose that there are at least three evolutionarily significant trends that gave raise to three subtypes: hand visuomotor, mouth visuomotor, and audio–vocal. Specifically, we put forward a mosaic evolution hypothesis, which posits that different types of MNs may have evolved at different rates within and among species. This evolutionary hypothesis represents an alternative to both adaptationist and associative models. Finally, the review offers a strong heuristic potential in predicting the circumstances under which specific variations and properties of MNs are expected. Such predictive value is critical to test new hypotheses about MN activity and its plastic changes, depending on the species, the neuroanatomical substrates, and the ecological niche.     

Evolution of human growth

The human pattern of growth and development (ontogeny) appears to differ markedly from patterns of ontogeny in other primate species. Humans present complex and sinuous growth curves for both body mass and stature. Many human proportions change dramatically during ontogeny, as we reach sizes that are among the largest of living primates. Perhaps most obviously, humans grow for a long time, with the interval between birth and maturation exceeding that of all other primate species. These ontogenetic traits are as distinctive as other key derived human traits, such as a large brain and language. Ontogenetic adaptations are also linked to human social organization, particularly by necessitating high levels of parental investment during the first several years of life.     

The evolution of the social brain: anthropoid primates contrast with other vertebrates

The social brain hypothesis argues that large brains have arisen over evolutionary time as a response to the social and ecological conflicts inherent in group living. We test predictions arising from the hypothesis using comparative data from birds and four mammalian orders (Carnivora, Artiodactyla, Chiroptera and Primates) and show that, across all non-primate taxa, relative brain size is principally related to pairbonding, but with enduring stable relationships in primates. We argue that this reflects the cognitive demands of the behavioural coordination and synchrony that is necessary to maintain stable pairbonded relationships. However, primates differ from the other taxa in that they also exhibit a strong effect of group size on brain size. We use data from two behavioural indices of social intensity (enduring bonds between group members and time devoted to social activities) to show that primate relationships differ significantly from those of other taxa. We suggest that, among vertebrates in general, pairbonding represents a qualitative shift from loose aggregations of individuals to complex negotiated relationships, and that these bonded relationships have been generalized to all social partners in only a few taxa (such as anthropoid primates).     

The ontogenetic origins of mirror neurons: evidence from 'tool-use' and 'audiovisual' mirror neurons

Since their discovery, mirror neurons-units in the macaque brain that discharge both during action observation and execution-have attracted considerable interest. Whether mirror neurons are an innate endowment or acquire their sensorimotor matching properties ontogenetically has been the subject of intense debate. It is widely believed that these units are an innate trait; that we are born with a set of mature mirror neurons because their matching properties conveyed upon our ancestors an evolutionary advantage. However, an alternative view is that mirror neurons acquire their matching properties during ontogeny, through correlated experience of observing and performing actions. The present article re-examines frequently overlooked neurophysiological reports of 'tool-use' and 'audiovisual' mirror neurons within the context of this debate. It is argued that these findings represent compelling evidence that mirror neurons are a product of sensorimotor experience, and not an innate endowment.