Differential elimination of rDNA genes in bobbed mutants of Drosophila melanogaster.

In Drosophila melanogaster, the multiply repeated genes encoding 18S and 28S rRNA are located on the X and Y chromosomes. A large percentage of these repeats are interrupted in the 28S region by insertions of two types. We compared the restriction patterns from a subcloned wild-type Oregon R strain to those of spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced bobbed mutants. Bobbed mutations were found to be deficiencies that modified the organization of the rDNA locus. Genes without insertions were deleted about twice as often as genes with type I insertions. Type II insertion genes were not decreased in number, except in the mutant having the most bobbed phenotype. Reversion to wild type was associated with an increase in gene copy number, affecting exclusively genes without insertions. One hypothesis which explains these results is the partial clustering of genes by type. The initial deletion could then be due either to an unequal crossover or to loss of material without exchange. Some of our findings indicated that deletion may be associated with an amplification phenomenon, the magnitude of which would be dependent on the amount of clustering of specific gene types at the locus.     

Indirect evidence of alteration in the expression of the rDNA genes in interspecific hybrids betweenDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans

Crosses betweenDrosophila melanogaster females andD. simulans males produce viable hybrid females, while males are lethal. These males are rescued if they carry theD. simulans Lhr gene. This paper reports that females of the wild-typeD. melanogaster population Staket do not produce viable hybrid males when crossed withD. simulans Lhr males, a phenomenon which we designate as the Staket phenotype. The agent responsible for this phenomenon was found to be the StaketX chromosome (X ^mel ,Stk). Analysis of the Staket phenotype showed that it is suppressed by extra copies ofD. melanogaster rDNA genes and that theX ^mel ,Stk chromosome manifests a weak bobbed phenotype inD. melanogaster X ^mel ,Stk/0 males. The numbers of functional rDNA genes inX ^mel ,Stk andX ^mel ,y w (control) chromosomes were found not to differ significantly. Thus a reduction in rDNA gene number cannot account for the weak bobbedX ^mel ,Stk phenotype let alone the Staket phenotype. The rRNA precursor molecules transcribed from theX ^mel ,Stk rDNA genes seem to be correctly processed in both intraspecific (melanogaster) and interspecific (melanogaster-simulans) conditions. It is therefore suggested that theX ^mel ,Stk rDNA genes are inefficiently transcribed in themelanogaster-simulans hybrids.     

A Study of Rdna Magnification Phenomenon in a Repair-Recombination Deficient Mutant of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

The rDNA magnification process consists of a rapid and inheritable rDNA increase occurring in bobbed males: in a few generations the bb loci acquire the wild-type rDNA value and reach a bb⁺ phenotype.—We have analyzed the rDNA magnification process in the repair-recombination-deficient mutant mei9^a, both at the phenotypical and rDNA content levels. In mei9^a bb double mutants the recovery of bb⁺ phenotype is strongly disturbed and the rDNA redundancy value fails to reach the wild-type level. The strong effect of this meiotic mutation on rDNA magnification suggests a close relationship between this phenomenon and the repair-recombination processes.     

Indirect evidence of alteration in the expression of the rDNA genes in interspecific hybrids betweenDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans

Crosses betweenDrosophila melanogaster females andD. simulans males produce viable hybrid females, while males are lethal. These males are rescued if they carry theD. simulans Lhr gene. This paper reports that females of the wild-typeD. melanogaster population Staket do not produce viable hybrid males when crossed withD. simulans Lhr males, a phenomenon which we designate as the Staket phenotype. The agent responsible for this phenomenon was found to be the StaketX chromosome (X ^mel ,Stk). Analysis of the Staket phenotype showed that it is suppressed by extra copies ofD. melanogaster rDNA genes and that theX ^mel ,Stk chromosome manifests a weak bobbed phenotype inD. melanogaster X ^mel ,Stk/0 males. The numbers of functional rDNA genes inX ^mel ,Stk andX ^mel ,y w (control) chromosomes were found not to differ significantly. Thus a reduction in rDNA gene number cannot account for the weak bobbedX ^mel ,Stk phenotype let alone the Staket phenotype. The rRNA precursor molecules transcribed from theX ^mel ,Stk rDNA genes seem to be correctly processed in both intraspecific (melanogaster) and interspecific (melanogaster-simulans) conditions. It is therefore suggested that theX ^mel ,Stk rDNA genes are inefficiently transcribed in themelanogaster-simulans hybrids.     

Autosomal Modifiers of the Bobbed Phenotype Are a Major Component of the Rdna Magnification Paradox in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

rDNA magnification in Drosophila melanogaster is defined experimentally as the ability of bb/Ybb- males to produce exceptional progeny that are wild type with respect to rDNA associated phenotypes. Here, we show that some of these bobbed-plus progeny result not from genetic reversion at the bb locus but rather from variants at two or more autosomal loci that ameliorate the bobbed phenotype of rDNA deficient males in Drosophila. In doing so we resolve several aspects of a long-standing paradox concerning the phenomenon of rDNA magnification. This problem arose from the use of two genetic assays, which were presumed to be identical, but paradoxically, produced conflicting data on both the kinetics of reversion and the stability of magnified bb+ chromosomes. We resolve this problem by demonstrating that in one assay bobbed-plus progeny arise primarily by genetic reversion at the bobbed locus, whereas in the other assay bobbed-plus progeny arise both by reversion and by an epistatic effect of autosomal modifiers on the bobbed phenotype. We further show that such modifiers can facilitate the appearance of phenotypically bobbed-plus progeny even under conditions where genetic reversion is blocked by magnification defective mutants. Finally, we present a speculative model relating the action of these modifiers to the large increases in rDNA content observed in males undergoing magnification.     

X chromosome nucleolus organizer mutants which alter major type I repeat multiplicity in Drosophila melanogaster

The nucleolus organizer (NO) of the D. melanogaster X chromosome is composed of ribosomal repeat units which contain two types (I and II) of non-rDNA insertions (In+) and repeats with no insertions (In-). Evidence from other laboratories indicate random interspersion of all types of repeat units within the X NO. An EcoRI and BamHI examination of rDNA from two bobbed mutants, bb2rI and mal12 demonstrates segregation of the major type I repeat units. The 46 rDNA repeats of the bb2rI NO contain no detectable major type I repeats whereas the majority of the 68 rDNA mal12 repeats are major type I and tandemly linked. This observation suggests that gross deletions of rDNA can result in nucleolus organizer regions with predominantly one type of repeat unit. Additivity tests demonstrate that the 46 ribosomal repeats of the bb2rI chromosome revert the phenotype of other bobbed NOs, but the 68 mal12 ribosomal repeats show no or slight additivity. This is in agreement with the observation that In+ repeats do not significantly contribute to functional rRNA. A Southern blot analysis using BamHI which cuts only in type I insertions demonstrates that the majority of major type I In+ repeating units exist in tandem linkage group(s) within the X NO.     

Non-random loss of uninterrupted ribosomal DNA repeating units upon induction of a bobbed mutation

To investigate the physical organization of ribosomal RNA genes of two bobbed (bb) loci carried by the Dp(1;f)122 free duplication, a wild type and a deleted one derived from it, genomic DNAs from XXNO-/Dp122bb+ and XXNO-/Dp122bb adult females were analyzed by restriction enzyme digestions. We found that in the bb mutant there was a loss of uninterrupted genes, while genes interrupted by type I and type II insertions remained apparently unchanged. This is an indication that at least in this wild type bb+ locus, carried by the 122 free duplication, the different repeating units are not distributed randomly. In fact, after digestion of the rDNA carried by the bb+ duplication with the enzyme BamHI that cuts only in type I insertions, we have obtained long uncleaved fragments of DNA containing uninterrupted genes.     

Amplification of rDNA and type I sequences in Drosophila males deficient in rDNA

rDNA magnification is a heritable change in rDNA content that occurs in D. melanogaster males when chromosomes deficient in rDNA are placed together for several generations. We have examined the restriction endonuclease cleavage pattern of the rDNA from an X chromosome undergoing magnification, and find no evidence for the selective amplification of either uninterrupted rDNA units or those containing insertion sequences. In addition, we observe an amplification of rDNA in the first generation of extremely bobbed male progeny to a level exceeding that of wild-type flies, but that reduces to the wild-type level in subsequent generations. The type I rDNA insertion elements also occur as tandem arrays, independently of rDNA. Southern hybridizations indicate that the majority of these sequences are located in the heterochromatin surrounding the nucleolus organizer on the X chromosome, and we find that they, too, amplify transiently in the first generation of magnifying males.     

Check of Gene Number during the Process of rDNA Magnification

THE multiple sequences of rDNA (DNA complementary to ribosomal RNA) of the Drosophila genome are localized at the bobbed locus, located in the X chromosome, position 66 and in the short arm of the Y chromosome^1,2. Wild bobbed (bb⁺) is that locus which, without a partner, gives rise to a normal phenotype. That locus which in similar conditions is incapable of giving rise to a normal phenotype is called a bobbed mutation (bb) and contains fewer genes for rRNA. The number of genes for rRNA in different individuals can vary considerably. One mechanism for rDNA variation is unequal crossing over³. Another mechanism, described by Tartof⁴, becomes apparent when individual flies, carrying only one bobbed locus, are constructed and only if such a locus is on the X chromosome; that is, if one constructs Xbb⁺/O males (and also Xbb/O males) or Xbb⁺/X_NO- females. Such individuals show a higher rDNA content than expected from the analysis of the same locus in Xbb⁺/Xbb⁺ females or in Xbb⁺/Ybb⁺ males. The increase of rDNA in this case is not inheritable⁴.     

Different behaviour of Xbb+ and Xbb chromosomes in D. melanogaster with only one nucleolus organizer.

Summary We have examined the rDNA content of male and female adult flies having only one nucleolus organizer (NO), using X chromosomes carrying wild or partially deleted bobbed loci (Xbb ⁺/O, Xbb ⁺/X_NO-and Xbb/O, Xbb/X_NO ^-).The results show that in Xbb ⁺/O and Xbb ⁺/X_NO ^-flies, where only somatic gene compensation is supposed to occur, the rDNA increase, although less pronounced than previously reported, is directly proportional to the number of rRNA genes initially present in the nucleolus organizer. In Xbb/O and in Xbb/X_NO ^-flies the rDNA increase is relatively much higher than that observed in flies carrying bb ⁺ instead of bb. It is suggested that this may be due to rDNA premagnification and somatic gene compensation occurring simultaneously in the former flies.On leave of absence from International Institute of Genetics and Biophysics, Naples, Italy     

Pleiotropic effects associated with the deletion of heterochromatin surrounding rDNA on the X chromosome of Drosophila

In Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome heterochromatin (Xh) constitutes the proximal 40% of the X chromosome DNA and contains a number of genetic elements with homologous sites on the Y chromosome, one of which is well defined, namely, the bobbed locus, the repetitive structural locus for the 18S and 28S rRNAs. This report presents the localisation of specific repeated DNA sequences within Xh and the employment of this sequence map in constructing new chromosomes to analyse the nature of the heterochromatin surrounding the rDNA region. Repeated sequences were located relative to inversion breakpoints which differentiate Xh cytogenetically. When the rDNA region was manipulated to be in a position in the chromosome so that it was without the Xh which normally surrounds it, the following obser-vations were made, (i) The rDNA region of Xh is intrinsically hetero-chromatic, remaining genetically active and yet possessing major heterochromatic properties even in the absence of the flanking heterochromatin regions, (ii) The size of the deletion removing the portion of Xh normally located distal to the rDNA region affected the dominance relationship between the X and Y nucleolar organizers (activity/endoreduplication assayed in male salivary glands). The X rDNA without any flanking heterochromatin was dominant over Y rDNA while the presence of some Xh allowed both the X and Y rDNA to be utilized, (iii) Enhancement of the position effect variegation on the white locus was demonstrated to occur as a result of the Xh deletions generated. EMS mutagenesis studies argue that the regions of Xh flanking the rDNA region contain no vital loci despite the fact that they strongly effect gene expression in some genotypes. This is consistent with early studies using X-ray mutagenesis (Lindsley et al., 1960). The pleiotropic effects of deleting specific regions of Xh is discussed in relation to the possible influence of heterochromatin on the organisation of the functional interphase nucleus.     

26S and 18S rRNA synthesis in bobbed mutants of Drosophila melanogaster

For the most part, bobbed mutations of Drosophila melanogaster consist of deletions of 26S and 18S rDNA located on the X and Y chromosomes. Studies on the synthesis of rRNA of third instar larvae and one day old adult females of three severe bobbed genotypes, indicate that no decrease can be detected, compared ot wild type strains. One of the bobbed mutants studied was a rather unusual type: these flies possess a quantity of rDNA that should confer upon them a near wild type phenotype whereas they actually show an extreme bobbed phenotype. The two other bobbed mutants are of a classical type: their severe bobbed phenotype corresponds to large deletions of rDNA. Two hypotheses can be proposed to explain the extreme bobbed phenotype of the flies, in spite of the fact that rRNA synthesis occurs normally. A regulatory phenomenon may interfere at the stages studied, but in earlier stages a net decrease in rRNA synthesis may have occurred producing an irreversible effect in the tissues affected by bobbed mutations (abdominal cuticle, bristles). The second hypothesis is that the rRNA produced may not be functional, perhaps because it is specific of earlier stages.     

Partial reversion at the bobbed locus of Drosophila melanogaster

In Drosophila melanogaster the tandemly arranged repetitive sequences coding for 18S and 28S rRNA are heterogenous at the level of the spacers between units and insertions that interrupt many 28S rRNA genes. This heterogeneity contrasts with the homogeneity of the regions transcribed into 18S and 28S rRNA. Homogenization and evolution of repetitive genes are usually explained by conversion, amplification events or unequal crossovers. In this paper we studied the change in rDNA patterns associated with partial reversion of bobbed mutations. In most cases, no increase in rDNA gene number, but a new repartition of gene types were found.     

The Effect of mei-41 on Rdna Redundancy in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

The recombination and repair defective mutant, mei-41, exhibits three rather striking effects on the genetic properties and chromosomal stability of rDNA in Drosophila. First, mei-41 inhibits rDNA magnification. However, mei-9, another recombination and repair defective mutation has no similar effect. This indicates that magnification requires some, but not all, of the gene products necessary for meiotic exchange. Second, under magnifying conditions, mei-41 induces interchanges between the X rDNA and either arm of the Ybb- chromosome. These interchanges occur at high frequency and are independent of rDNA orientation. Third, in mei-41 bb+/Ybb+ males, bobbed mutants in the X, but not the Y, also arise at high frequency. Evidence suggests that these events involve the rDNA type I insertion. The recombination and repair defective properties of mei-41 together with our results regarding its unusual and specific effects involving rDNA are explained in a simple model that has general implications for chromosome structure.     

Structure,molecular evolution and maintenance of copy number of extended repeated structures in the X-heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster

The 60 kb repeats located in the distal heterochromatin of the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster were cloned in overlapping cosmids. These regions, designated as SCLRs, comprised the following types of repeated elements Stellate genes, which are known to be involved in spermatogenesis; copia-like retrotransposons; LINE elements, including amplified Type rDNA insertions; and rDNA fragments. The following steps in SCLR formation were hypothesized: insertion of mobile elements into the rDNA and Stellate gene clusters: internal tandem duplication events; recombination between the rDNA cluster and Stellate tandem repeat; and amplification of the whole SCLR structure. There are about nine SCLR copies per haploid genome, but there is approximately a twofold variation in copy number between fly stocks. The SCLR copy number differences between closely related stocks are suggested to be the result of unequal sister chromatid exchange (USCE). The restricted variation in SCLR copy number between unrelated stocks and the absence of chromosomes free of SCLRs suggests that natural selection is active in copy number maintenance.     

X-Y Exchange and the Coevolution of the X and Y Rdna Arrays in Drosophila melanogaster

The nucleolus organizers on the X and Y chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster are the sites of 200-250 tandemly repeated genes for ribosomal RNA. As there is no meiotic crossing over in male Drosophila, the X and Y chromosomal rDNA arrays should be evolutionarily independent, and therefore divergent. The rRNAs produced by X and Y are, however, very similar, if not identical. Molecular, genetic and cytological analyses of a series of X chromosome rDNA deletions (bb alleles) showed that they arose by unequal exchange through the nucleolus organizers of the X and Y chromosomes. Three separate exchange events generated compound X·Y ^L chromosomes carrying mainly Y-specific rDNA. This led to the hypothesis that X-Y exchange is responsible for the coevolution of X and Y chromosomal rDNA. We have tested and confirmed several of the predictions of this hypothesis: First, X· Y^L chromosomes must be found in wild populations. We have found such a chromosome. Second, the X·Y^L chromosome must lose the Y^L arm, and/or be at a selective disadvantage to normal X⁺ chromosomes, to retain the normal morphology of the X chromosome. Six of seventeen sublines founded from homozygous X·Y^Lbb stocks have become fixed for chromosomes with spontaneous loss of part or all of the appended Y^L. Third, rDNA variants on the X chromosome are expected to be clustered within the X⁺ nucleolus organizer, recently donated (" Y") forms being proximal, and X-specific forms distal. We present evidence for clustering of rRNA genes containing Type 1 insertions. Consequently, X-Y exchange is probably responsible for the coevolution of X and Y rDNA arrays.     

Restriction of plasmid-mediated transformation in Bacillus subtilis 168.

Summary When plasmids carrying leucine genes of Bacillus subtilis 168 were isolated from a restriction and modification deficient (r^-m^-) strain and used for transformation of a restricting strain B. subtilis 168 leu recE4, the number of transformants was greatly reduced. Transformation of a rec ⁺ strain (transformation by integration of the donor DNA into the chromosome) with the plasmids was not affected irrespective of whether the recipient carried the r⁺ or r^- phenotype. These results show that the plasmid-mediated transformation is subject to the host controlled restriction and suggest that r^-m^- strains should be used for construction of recombinant DNA molecules in B. subtilis 168.