米卡芬净预防血液系统恶性肿瘤患者侵袭性真菌感染有效性和安全性的Meta分析

目的系统评价米卡芬净预防血液系统恶性肿瘤患者侵袭性真菌感染(IFIs)的有效性及安全性,为临床治疗提供循证参考。方法计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据,检索时限为建库起至2021年1月,收集米卡芬净(试验组)对比常规抗真菌药物(两性霉素B及三唑类抗真菌药,对照组)的随机对照试验(RCT),对符合纳入标准的临床研究进行资料提取并采用Cochrane系统评价员手册5.0.2进行质量评价后,采用Rev Man 5.3统计软件对突破性IFIs、真菌感染死亡率、全因死亡率及因不良反应停药的发生率进行Meta分析。结果共纳入9项RCT,合计2 479例患者。Meta分析结果显示,试验组患者突破性IFIs发生率[OR=0.74,95%CI(0.50,1.07),P=0.11]、真菌感染死亡率[OR=0.73,95%CI(0.46,1.17),P=0.19]和全因死亡率[OR=0.94,95%CI(0.69,1.28),P=0.7]与对照组相比,差异无统计学意义;因不良反应停药的发生率[OR=0.46,95%CI(0.32,0.66),P<0.0001]显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义。结论米卡芬净用于预防血液系统恶性肿瘤患者IFIs的效果与两性霉素B及三唑类抗真菌药物相当,且安全性更高。     

Aspergillus in the Intensive Care Unit

Invasive aspergillosis (IA), the most life-threatening form of aspergillosis, has become a major opportunistic fungal disease in immunocompromised patients. In high-risk patients with hematologic malignancies, IA appears to decline with the use of mold-active antifungal prophylaxis, but the situation is less clear in other patient groups at risk for IA, and precise epidemiologic data from patients treated in intensive care units (ICUs) are lacking. Most Aspergillus culture isolates from nonsterile body sites do not represent disease, but isolation of Aspergillus in critically ill patients is a marker of poor prognosis and is associated with high mortality regardless of invasion or colonization. This review presents current information on epidemiology, risk factors, and diagnosis, and discusses treatment options for patients with IA in the ICU.     

The role of adjuvant agents in treating fungal diseases

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality despite the recent introduction of new antifungal medications. In this review, the available data on the use of adjuvant agents for the treatment of IFIs are discussed. Cytokines such as interferon-γ, colony-stimulating factors, granulocyte transfusions, and the monoclonal antibody efungumab may have in a role in the management of IFIs through augmentation of the host immune response, whereas pathogen-specific vaccines may help prevent infection. Pentraxin 3, an acute phase protein, may assist in the prevention and treatment of aspergillosis. Deferasirox, an iron chelator, is being investigated as an adjunctive therapy for the treatment of zygomycosis. Lactoferrin, an ironbinding protein, appears to have activity in Candida and Aspergillus infections, and omiganan may help prevent fungal catheter-related infections. Although none of these agents are currently approved for the treatment of IFIs, they may be involved in current and/or future treatment options when used in combination with antifungal drugs.     

Is There Still a Place for Conventional Amphotericin B in the Treatment of Neonatal Fungal Infections?

Neonatal invasive fungal infections (IFIs) remain an increasing problem associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, as well as late-onset neurodevelopmental implications. Invasive candidiasis remains the leading neonatal IFI. Candida albicans is the fungal species most often affecting this population, although a changing epidemiologic incidence to non-albicans Candida species is reported in some neonatal intensive care units. Many treatment recommendations are extrapolated from adult populations, emphasizing the need to establish the optimal antifungal agent, dosage, and duration of therapy in neonates. Historically, conventional amphotericin B has been considered an efficient and safe treatment approach for most neonatal IFIs. More recently, lipid formulations of amphotericin B have been studied, used alone or in combination with other antifungal agents such as azoles or echinocandins. The aim of this article is to review the published experience in the use of amphotericin B formulations to treat neonatal IFIs.     

侵袭性真菌感染治疗新进展

随着免疫受损人群的增多,近年来侵袭性真菌感染的发生率逐渐升高,由此导致的致病率也逐年上升.如何及时诊断并有效的治疗侵袭性真菌感染已成为临床上面临的挑战之一.该文就侵袭性真菌感染的流行病学、病因学及现有的治疗策略等方面进行综述.     

Enfermedades invasoras por hongos levaduriformes en pacientes neutropénicos

Invasive fungal diseases caused by yeasts still play an important role in the morbidity and mortality in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies. Although the overall incidence of invasive candidiasis has decreased due to widespread use of antifungal prophylaxis, the incidence of non-Candida albicans Candida species is increasing compared with that of C. albicans, and mortality of invasive candidiasis continues to be high. In addition, there has been an increase in invasive infections caused by an array of uncommon yeasts, including species of the genus Malassezia, Rhodotorula, Trichosporon and Saprochaete, characterised by their resistance to echinocandins and poor prognosis.     

Epidemiology of fungal infections in liver transplant recipients: a six-year study of a large Brazilian liver transplantation centre

Liver transplant seems to be an effective option to prolong survival in patients with end-stage liver disease, although it still can be followed by serious complications. Invasive fungal infections (ifi) are related to high rates of morbidity and mortality. The epidemiology of fungal infections in Brazilian liver transplant recipients is unknown. The aim of this observational and retrospective study was to determine the incidence and epidemiology of fungal infections in all patients who underwent liver transplantation at Albert Einstein Israeli Hospital between 2002-2007. A total of 596 liver transplants were performed in 540 patients. Overall, 77 fungal infections occurred in 68 (13%) patients. Among the 77 fungal infections, there were 40 IFI that occurred in 37 patients (7%). Candida and Aspergillus species were the most common etiologic agents. Candida species accounted for 82% of all fungal infections and for 67% of all IFI, while Aspergillus species accounted for 9% of all fungal infections and for 17% of all IFI. Non-albicans Candida species were the predominant Candida isolates. Invasive aspergillosis tended to occur earlier in the post-transplant period. These findings can contribute to improve antifungal prophylaxis and therapy practices in Brazilian centres.     

Invasive Fungal Infections: A Continuing Challenge Report from the 17th International Symposium on Infections in the Immunocompromised Host, Genoa, Italy, 24–27 July 2012

The management of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) remains a challenge to the most experienced clinicians and mycologists as the therapeutic landscape continues to change. Delegates to the 17th International Symposium on Infections in the Immunocompromised Host heard that fungal epidemiology, patient demographics, diagnosis and treatment are all evolving. Diagnosis-driven therapy—pre-emptive or targeted—is the ideal approach to managing IFIs, but is dependent on reliable biomarker assays to identify, or at least strongly suggest, the organism(s) responsible. Biomarkers, however, are subject to ongoing research and so are also evolving. Some assays also may not be available in a particular centre. The same applies to investigations such as CT-scans and bronchoscopy that need to be performed in a timely fashion to help confirm an IFI. Thus, for patients with febrile neutropenia despite broad-spectrum antibiotic cover, clinicians without the appropriate diagnostic facilities prefer to start antifungal (AF) treatment immediately whilst attempting to confirm the diagnosis. Empirical therapy therefore looks likely to have a role for some time. For high-risk patients, such as those with haematological malignancies and/or undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), the preferred strategy is to prevent IFIs using AF prophylaxis although regular screening with biomarkers is an alternative.     

侵袭性真菌感染早期诊断技术的研究进展

侵袭性真菌感染（invasive fungal infections,IFIs）是真菌入侵人体导致血流、各脏器或全身播散的严重感染,以念珠菌为主的酵母样真菌和曲霉为主的丝状真菌最常见。近年来IFIs发病率及死亡率在全球范围内有显著上升趋势,严重威胁着人类的健康。早期快速的诊断方法现己成为真菌感染研究领域的热点和难点,对于患者及时治疗和死亡率的降低有十分重要的意义。本文旨对目前侵袭性真菌早期相关诊断技术以及临床研究的问题和现状予以总结,同时预测该领域未来的发展趋势。     

High Incidences of Invasive Fungal Infections in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Receiving Induction Chemotherapy without Systemic Antifungal Prophylaxis: A Prospective Observational Study in Taiwan

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) is an important complication for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients receiving induction chemotherapy. However, the epidemiological information is not clear in Southeastern Asia, an area of potential high incidences of IFIs. To clarify it, we enrolled 298 non-M3 adult AML patients receiving induction chemotherapy without systemic anti-fungal prophylaxis from Jan 2004 to Dec 2009, when we applied a prospective diagnostic and treatment algorithm for IFIs. Their demographic parameters, IFI characters, and treatment outcome were collected for analysis. The median age of these patients was 51 years. Standard induction chemotherapy was used for 246 (82.6%) patients, and 66.8% of patients achieved complete remission (CR) or partial remission. The incidence of all-category IFIs was 34.6% (5.7% proven IFIs, 5.0% probable IFIs and 23.8% possible IFIs). Candida tropicalis was the leading pathogen among yeast, and lower respiratory tract was the most common site for IFIs (75.4%, 80/106). Standard induction chemotherapy and failure to CR were identified as risk factors for IFIs. The presence of IFI in induction independently predicted worse survival (hazard ratio 1.536 (1.100–2.141), p value = 0.012). Even in those who survived from the initial IFI insults after 3 months, the presence of IFIs in induction still predicted a poor long-term survival. This study confirms high incidences of IFIs in Southeastern Asia, and illustrates potential risk factors; poor short-term and long-term outcomes are also demonstrated. This epidemiological information will provide useful perspectives for anti-fungal prophylaxis and treatment for AML patients during induction, so that best chances of cure and survival can be provided.     

Aspergilosis invasora en el paciente con enfermedad oncohematológica

Invasive aspergillosis is the most common invasive fungal infection in patients with acute hematological malignancies or treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation due to the marked alteration of the physiological mechanisms of antifungal immunity that takes place in these situations. For this reason, antifungal prophylaxis has a relevant role in these patients. The introduction of new antifungal agents has motivated the updating of recommendations for prophylaxis and treatment in different guidelines.The objectives of this chapter are a brief review of the mechanisms of immunity against fungi, the definition of risk for developing an invasive fungal infection and an update of the prophylaxis recommendations and treatment of invasive aspergillosis in the group of patients with hematological diseases.     

Epidemiology of Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients with Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome at a Reference Hospital for Infectious Diseases in Brazil

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) represent one of the main causes of morbimortality in immunocompromised patients. Pneumocystosis, cryptococcosis and histoplasmosis are the most frequently occurring IFIs in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Fungi, such as Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., may cause severe diseases during the course of an HIV infection. Following the introduction of highly active anti-retroviral therapy, there has been a marked reduction of opportunistic fungal infections, which today is 20–25 % of the number of infections observed in the mid-1990s. This study is an observational and retrospective study aimed at the characterising IFI incidence and describing the epidemiology, clinical diagnostic and therapeutic features and denouement in HIV/AIDS patients. In HIV/AIDS patients, the IFI incidence is 54.3/1,000 hospitalisation/year, with a lethality of 37.7 %. Cryptococcosis represents the main opportunistic IFI in the population, followed by histoplasmosis. Nosocomial pathogenic yeast infections are caused principally by Candida spp., with a higher candidemia incidence at our institution compared to other Brazilian centres.     

Low Rate of Invasive Fungal Infections During Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy for Adults with De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia Without Anti-mold Prophylaxis: Single-Center 2002–2018 Empirical/Pre-emptive Approach

Broad-spectrum antifungal prophylaxis is currently considered the standard of care for adults with de novo AML for the prevention of invasive fungal infections (IFIs), especially invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). Because fluconazole has been used in our center as anti-yeast prophylaxis, we sought to analyze in detail the incidence of IFIs over a 17-year period, as well as their impact on outcome. A standardized protocol of patient management, including serum galactomannan screening and thoracic CT-guided diagnostic-driven antifungal therapy, was used in all patients. A total of 214 consecutive adults with de novo AML who were treated in 3 CETLAM (Grupo Cooperativo para el Estudio y Tratamiento de las Leucemias Agudas y Mielodisplasias) protocols from 2002 to 2018 were included. The 90-day incidence of any IFI (including possible cases) was 11% (95% CI 4–15%), most cases occurred during induction chemotherapy (8%, 95% CI 4–12%), and most cases were probable/proven IPA (8%, 95% CI 3–13%). Developing an IFI during induction and consolidation had no impact on 1-year survival. A case–control study with 23 cases of IPA and 69 controls identified induction/re-induction chemotherapy, chronic pulmonary disease and age?>?60 years/poor baseline performance status as potential pretreatment risk factors. The current study proves that inpatient induction and consolidation chemotherapy for de novo AML can be given in areas with “a priori” high-burden of airborne molds with fluconazole prophylaxis, while the selective use of anti-mold prophylaxis in patients at very high risk may further reduce the incidence of IFI in this specific clinical scenario.

     

Antifungal Therapy for Invasive Fungal Diseases in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: An Update

Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) recipients. While the most common pathogens are Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., the incidence of infections caused by non-albicans Candida species as well as molds such as Zygomycetes has increased. For many years, amphotericin B deoxycholate (AMB-D) was the only available antifungal for the treatment of IFDs. Within the past decade, there has been a surge of new antifungal agents developed and added to the therapeutic armamentarium. Lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B provide an effective and less nephrotoxic alternative to AMB-D. Voriconazole has now replaced AMB-D as first choice for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis (IA). Another extended-spectrum triazole, posaconazole, also appears to be a promising agent in the management of zygomycosis, refractory aspergillosis, and for prophylaxis. Members of the newest antifungal class, the echinocandins, are attractive agents in select infections due to their safety profile, and are a more attractive option compared to AMB-D as initial treatment for invasive candidiasis and (based on one study) challenge fluconazole for superiority in management with this mycoses. However, challenges do exist among these newer agents in very high-risk individuals like allogeneic SCT recipients, which may include adverse drug events, drug–drug interactions, variability in oral absorption, and availability of alternative formulations. The addition of newer agents has also stimulated interest in the potential application of combination therapy in serious, life-threatening infections. However, adequate studies are not available for most IFDs; thus, the clinical use of combination therapy is not evidenced based on most cases and preciseness in its use is uncertain. Finally, therapeutic drug monitoring of select antifungals (notably posaconazole and voriconazole) may play an increasing role due to significant interpatient variability in serum concentrations after standard doses.     

Voriconazole for the therapy of mycoses in recipients of solid organ transplants

Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are the third cause of infectious complications in recipients of solid organ transplants (SOT), showing an incidence of 5-42% depending of the trasplanted organ. Moreover, IFI account for significant morbility and mortality in SOT, ranging between 25-95% depending on the type of fungus and its organ localization. Different strategies (prophylaxis, preemptive treatment, treatment, antifungal combinations, routes of administration) have been tested to improve the prognosis of IFI in SOT. To reach this objective, it was essential to have access to new antifungals showing a higher spectrum of activity on the fungal pathogens, both classical and emerging, and showing improvements in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, ease of administration and acceptability and lower rates of adverse effects. Introduction of voriconazole in the therapeutic arsenal has facilitated to reach these goals due to its special pharmacological characteristics, its in vitro antifungal activity and the in vivo clinical efficacy demonstrated in different studies.     

Primary and Secondary Antifungal Prophylaxis in the Immunocompromised Child: Where do we Stand?

Invasive opportunistic fungal infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised children undergoing chemotherapy or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Primary and secondary chemoprophylaxis of invasive fungal infections targets high risk disease-related patients with acute myeloid leukaemia, high risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemias, recurrent leukaemias and those following allogeneic HSCT. The rationale for antifungal prophylaxis in high risk patients comes from two different aspects. On the one hand, is the difficulty of instant diagnosis and, on the other hand, the consequences of morbidity and mortality by invasive infectious diseases. Although we have limited pediatric data concerning antifungal prophylaxis, it has become part of infectious disease supportive care schemes in most of paediatric leukaemia and HSCT centres. This review has insights on the evidence concerning primary and secondary antifungal prophylaxis in immunocompromised children. Although our knowledge comes from large adult studies concerning antifungal agents, there is a great need for evidence of primary or secondary antifungal prophylaxis in large pediatric clinical trials in order to have a consensus in primary and secondary antifungal prophylaxis in immunocompromised children.     

Antifungal Prophylaxis in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Invasive fungal infections in children have shown a dramatic increase over the last two decades. Their importance and clinical implications are more prominent in selected groups of patients such as critically ill children in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). This population constitutes an important target for prophylactic antifungal interventions. While antifungal agents have been studied in various clinical settings, knowledge in this particular setting is rather scant. The current data suggest that antifungal prophylaxis in the PICU setting should be tailored to the needs of each patient guided by the individual’s risk factors and local epidemiology.

     

Current indications for voriconazole in onco-hematological patients

Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are the main cause of infectious death in cancer patients, especially in hematological malignancies and hematopoietic transplant recipients. Current epidemiology is characterized by a predominance of IFI caused by molds, mainly aspergillosis, along with a emergence of hard-to-treat fungi such are Zygomicetes, Fusarium and Scedosporium. Voriconazole is a broad spectrum antifungal agent with oral and intravenous formulations, approved by the EMEA for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis, candidemia in non-neutropenic patients, IFI caused by fluconazole-resistant species of Candida as well as Scedosporium and Fusarium infections. However, its use in clinical practice is broader, as empirical antifungal treatment and as secondary prophylaxis. It should be kept in mind the possibility of breakthrough IFI, particularly zygomycosis, in patients treated with voriconazole for long periods.     

Aerosolized Antifungals for the Prevention and Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections

Invasive fungal infections result in significant morbidity and mortality, most notably in immunosuppressed patients. Aerosolized antifungal agents have been utilized primarily as prophylaxis (either alone or in combination with systemic antifungals) in patients at highest risk of invasive infections in attempts to optimize drug delivery while minimizing the potential for systemic toxicity and/or drug interactions. Published clinical experience with aerosolized antifungals most frequently involves various formulations of the polyene amphotericin B in patients undergoing lung transplantation and/or select patients with hematologic malignancy. Adverse events are infrequent and generally limited to dyspnea, dysgeusia, and cough. Existing data suggests lipid-based amphotericin B formulations may be better tolerated than amphotericin B deoxycholate. Published clinical experience with aerosolized antifungals as adjunctive treatment of invasive fungal infections is limited to case reports. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support use of aerosolized echinocandins and azoles in clinical practice. Outstanding questions regarding comparative efficacy, optimal dose, duration and drug delivery present a continuing challenge when utilizing these agents in clinical practice.     

Meta-Analysis and Cost Comparison of Empirical versus Pre-Emptive Antifungal Strategies in Hematologic Malignancy Patients with High-Risk Febrile Neutropenia

Background

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) causes significant morbidity and mortality in hematologic malignancy patients with high-risk febrile neutropenia (FN). These patients therefore often receive empirical antifungal therapy. Diagnostic test-guided pre-emptive antifungal therapy has been evaluated as an alternative treatment strategy in these patients.

Methods

We conducted an electronic search for literature comparing empirical versus pre-emptive antifungal strategies in FN among adult hematologic malignancy patients. We systematically reviewed 9 studies, including randomized-controlled trials, cohort studies, and feasibility studies. Random and fixed-effect models were used to generate pooled relative risk estimates of IFD detection, IFD-related mortality, overall mortality, and rates and duration of antifungal therapy. Heterogeneity was measured via Cochran’s Q test, I² statistic, and between study τ². Incorporating these parameters and direct costs of drugs and diagnostic testing, we constructed a comparative costing model for the two strategies. We conducted probabilistic sensitivity analysis on pooled estimates and one-way sensitivity analyses on other key parameters with uncertain estimates.

Results

Nine published studies met inclusion criteria. Compared to empirical antifungal therapy, pre-emptive strategies were associated with significantly lower antifungal exposure (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27–0.85) and duration without an increase in IFD-related mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.36–1.87) or overall mortality (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.46–1.99). The pre-emptive strategy cost $324 less (95% credible interval -$291.88 to $418.65 pre-emptive compared to empirical) than the empirical approach per FN episode. However, the cost difference was influenced by relatively small changes in costs of antifungal therapy and diagnostic testing.

Conclusions

Compared to empirical antifungal therapy, pre-emptive antifungal therapy in patients with high-risk FN may decrease antifungal use without increasing mortality. We demonstrate a state of economic equipoise between empirical and diagnostic-directed pre-emptive antifungal treatment strategies, influenced by small changes in cost of antifungal therapy and diagnostic testing, in the current literature. This work emphasizes the need for optimization of existing fungal diagnostic strategies, development of more efficient diagnostic strategies, and less toxic and more cost-effective antifungals.