植物衰老中的编程性细胞死亡

本文通过对植物衰老和动植物中编程性细胞死亡(PCD)的研究,阐述了植物衰老中PCD存在的依据,澄清了植物衰老和PCD的关系,提出了植物衰老中可能的PCD发生途径,为调控植物衰老的遗传操作提供依据.     

植物细胞程序性死亡(PCD)的研究进展

细胞死亡是动、植物生长发育过程中常见的一种生命现象 ,而细胞程序性死亡 (PCD)是细胞遵循自身生命活动程序 ,并受多种因子调控的一种积极的死亡方式。近年来随着动物中PCD研究的深入 ,植物PCD亦得到相应的研究。植物细胞程序性死亡研究不仅可揭示植物衰老、死亡的内部变化规律 ,而且可为其生长发育的调控提供依据和技术。该文试对有关PCD的特点、研究意义及近年来的研究概况与方法进行简述与评价。     

简评《植物衰老生理与分子生物学》博士专著

《植物衰老生理与分子生物学》是国家农业部教育司和农业出版社共同组织编辑出版的《中国博士专著·农业领域》系列丛书中的一册 ,于 2 0 0 1年 9月出版 ,由沈成国主编。该书较详细而全面地反映了近年来我国在植物衰老领域中的研究进展 ,其中植株整体水平衰老、植物根与根瘤衰老部分比较新颖 ,有我国在此领域的研究特色。同时也系统地介绍了国外在此领域的研究情况和进展 ,如从植物细胞编程性死亡 (PCD)的特征、植物衰老与PCD、植物环境互作中的PCD、PCD的分子机制与调控等方面对细胞编程性死亡进行了全面阐述。另外 ,专著还介绍了一些…     

植物细胞程序性死亡——一个新兴的研究领域

近年来,越来越多的证据表明,植物细胞在生理、病理或逆境条件下可发生程序性死亡(Programmed Cell Death．PCD)。本文详细描述了植物PCD的形态和生化特征、生理功能及其研究意义,并把这些方面与动物PCD做了比较。另外,虽然植物PCD的研究尚处于起步阶段,本文还是对其可能的信号传导机制、遗传调控以及PCD的起源与进化作了探讨,并提出了植物PCD的研究战略。具体说来有以下几个方面：1形态和生化特征：目前,植物PCD的研究主要还集中于形态和生化方面的描述。各种条件下的植物PCD在形态和生化特征上都或多或少地与动物细胞凋亡存在差异,并不符合动物细胞凋亡定义的全部内容。并且不同植物PCD类型相互之间也存在着较大的不同。尽管如此,动植物PCD在形态和生化方面还是存在许多相似之处。无炎症反应、DNA的特异片段化以及核酸内切酶和蛋白酶活性的升高在植物中也依然是区别PCD与细胞坏死(necrosis)的形态和生化依据。2．分子水平上,植物PCD也涉及到许多信号分子和特定基因参与调控的信号传导途径。但到目前为止,已分离的与植物PCD直接相关的基因只有ACD2、Dad1等少数几个．尽管己证明一些信号分子如活性氧种类(reactive oxygen species,ROSs)、Ca2 、植物激素等参与了植物PCD的信号传导,而对其信号传导途径及机制还一无所知。不过,这些信号分子及几个相关基因的分离将有助于阐明植物PCD的信号传导机制。并且,从已有的证据看来,参与PCD的基因以及一些信号分子在动植物中具有相当的保守性,因此推测动植物PCD可能存在共同的基因调控规律及信号传导机制。近来,在HR以及发育过程中的PCD中检测到有类似caspase的蛋白酶的参与。这些证据表明,PCD在分子水平上具有一定的保守性,为PCD的起源与进化提供了有力的证据。3．植物PCD的生理功能也与动物的相似。在植物的生殖、发育,生长、衰老以及植物抗病、抗逆等整个生命过程中,PCD担负着与细胞增殖同等重要的生理功能。因此,无论从理论还是从实践上,植物PCD都具有重要的研究意义。4．纵观各方面的证据可以推测,PCD起源于原核生物,并随着生物的进化而进化。在生物进化树的分支上,已发现不同类型的PCD形式。结论：许多内因或外因都能打破植物的体内平衡,最终导致细胞分化、增殖、静止或死亡。纵观各种生,病理及逆境胁迫下的植物PCD可以看出,虽然它们之间有着较大的不同,并且都与动物细胞凋亡存在较大的差异、那些共同的形态和生化特征应该便可以做为PCD的定义内容。     

植物蛋白酶研究进展

蛋白酶广泛存在于植物体内,是植物生长发育必不可少的.主要综述了各种蛋白酶在种子贮藏蛋白的沉积和降解、植物对外界的胁迫响应、植物衰老和PCD过程的重要作用及相关研究进展.并对蛋白酶体途径进行了简要介绍.     

高等植物的PCD研究进展(一)

植物细胞程序性死亡(programmed cell death,PCD)已成为当前生物学的研究热点之一。植物PCD普遍存在于植物器官和个体生长发育过程及与环境相互作用过程中,具有重要的生物学意义。在高等植物生长发育过程中,根冠细胞、导管细胞、绒毡层细胞、胚乳细胞、胚柄细胞、糊粉细胞、大孢子细胞、助细胞和反足细胞等细胞在一定程度上均发生了PCD。另外,衰老也涉及PCD。本文综述了最近几年来与发育有关的PCD研究进展,主要包括高等植物细胞死亡的形式、起因及其PCD的形态、生化特征及高等植物营养器官(根、茎和叶)和生殖器官(花、果实和种子)在其生长发育过程中的PCD。文章最后还对植物PCD的进化和生物学意义作了进一步的讨论。 Abstract：Plant programmed cell death(PCD),the details of which are becoming a focus of intensive research in biology, is a ubiquitous phenomenon and plays an improtant biological role in the develpoment of organs and whole organisms and in interactions with the environment.During higher plant development,root cap cells,tracheary elements(TEs),tapetalcells,endosperm cells,suspensor cells,aleurone cells,megaspore cells,help cells and antipodal cells,etc.undergo PCD to some degree.In addition,senescence also involves PCD.This paper mainly reviewed PCD research progress in higher plant development in recent years,including forms and causes of cell death and PCD morphological and biochemical features in higher plants;PCD in development of nutritive organs(root ,stem and leaf) and reproductive organs(flower ,fruit and seed),evolution and biological rloes of plant PCD were further discussed in the paper.     

植物中的细胞程序性死亡

细胞程序性死亡(PCD)对于维持植物的正常生长发育非常重要,目前已成为植物学研究的一个热点。本文综合评述了近年来植物PCD研究的某些进展,包括植物PCD的特征,植物的营养生长、生殖生长以及与环境互作过程中存在的各种PCD及其证据,植物PCD发生的分子机制及其调控等等。对植物PCD研究中有待进一步解决的问题和可能意义提出了自己的见解。     

植物发育过程中的细胞程序性死亡

细胞程序性死亡(PCD)是植物发育过程中必不可少的一部分,近年来对植物发育过程中的细胞程序性死亡机制的研究已经广泛开展。植物发育过程中的PCD对植物自身形态建成和组织分化有重要意义。一般认为动、植物的PCD有很大的相似性,但植物发育过程也有着独特的PCD机制,例如依靠有裂解功能的液泡来参与PCD。通过比较植物和其他生物发育过程中的PCD,可对植物发育过程中PCD的特征有着更深入的了解。说明植物发育过程中PCD的研究将在理论和生产上有重大意义。     

光周期对西葫芦185品系顶芽和叶片衰老的调控

在短日照下 ,西葫芦 (CucurbitapepoLinn .) 185品系的植株发生衰老。结构学、基因表达与系列生化分析证实 :短日照启动了顶端分生组织由营养生长锥向花芽的转化 ,进而其组成细胞发生编程性死亡 (PCD) ,导致顶端生长势的丧失 ;与长日照处理相比 ,短日照处理在发育晚期也引起大量叶肉细胞发生PCD ,进而叶片出现衰老。核酸酶活性的高度表达是PCD过程中一个非常重要的分子事件。实验证实 ,西葫芦 185品系植株衰老进程的发生与顶端分生组织和叶肉细胞中发生PCD密切相关。     

光周期对西葫芦185品系顶芽和叶片衰老的调控

在短日照下,西葫芦(Cucurbita pepo Linn.)185品系的植株发生衰老.结构学、基因表达与系列生化分析证实:短日照启动了顶端分生组织由营养生长锥向花芽的转化,进而其组成细胞发生编程性死亡(PCD),导致顶端生长势的丧失;与长日照处理相比,短日照处理在发育晚期也引起大量叶肉细胞发生PCD,进而叶片出现衰老.核酸酶活性的高度表达是PCD过程中一个非常重要的分子事件.实验证实,西葫芦185品系植株衰老进程的发生与顶端分生组织和叶肉细胞中发生PCD密切相关.     

Plant organ senescence – regulation by manifold pathways

Senescence is the final stage of plant ontogeny before death. Senescence may occur naturally because of age or may be induced by various endogenous and exogenous factors. Despite its destructive character, senescence is a precisely controlled process that follows a well‐defined order. It is often inseparable from programmed cell death (PCD), and a correlation between these processes has been confirmed during the senescence of leaves and petals. Despite suggestions that senescence and PCD are two separate processes, with PCD occurring after senescence, cell death responsible for senescence is accompanied by numerous changes at the cytological, physiological and molecular levels, similar to other types of PCD. Independent of the plant organ analysed, these changes are focused on initiating the processes of cellular structural degradation via fluctuations in phytohormone levels and the activation of specific genes. Cellular structural degradation is genetically programmed and dependent on autophagy. Phytohormones/plant regulators are heavily involved in regulating the senescence of plant organs and can either promote [ethylene, abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonic acid (JA), and polyamines (PAs)] or inhibit [cytokinins (CKs)] this process. Auxins and carbohydrates have been assigned a dual role in the regulation of senescence, and can both inhibit and stimulate the senescence process. In this review, we introduce the basic pathways that regulate senescence in plants and identify mechanisms involved in controlling senescence in ephemeral plant organs. Moreover, we demonstrate a universal nature of this process in different plant organs; despite this process occurring in organs that have completely different functions, it is very similar. Progress in this area is providing opportunities to revisit how, when and which way senescence is coordinated or decoupled by plant regulators in different organs and will provide a powerful tool for plant physiology research.     

Polyamines are common players in different facets of plant programmed cell death

Programmed cell death (PCD) is a process that occurs throughout the life span of every plant life, from initial germination of the seed to the senescence of the plant. It is a normal physiological milestone during the plant’s developmental process, but it can also be induced by external factors, including a variety of environmental stresses and as a response to pathogen infections. Changes in the morphology of the nucleus is one of the most noticeable during PCD but all the components of the plant cell (cytoplasm, cytoskeleton and organelles) are involved in this fascinating process. To date, relatively little is known about PCD in plants, but several factors, among which polyamines (PAs) and plant growth regulators, have been shown to play an important role in the initiation and regulation of the process. The role of PAs in plant PCD appears to be multifaceted acting in some instances as pro-survival molecules, whereas in others seem to be implicated in accelerating PCD. The molecular mechanism is still under study. Here we present some PCD plant models, focusing on the role of the enzyme responsible for PA conjugation to proteins: transglutaminase (TGase), an enzyme linked with the process of PCD also in some animal models. The role of PAs and plant TGase in the senescence and PCD in flowers, leaf and the self-incompatibility of pollen will be discussed and examined in depth.     

Senescence and programmed cell death: substance or semantics?

The terms senescence and programmed cell death (PCD) have led to some confusion. Senescence as visibly observed in, for example, leaf yellowing and petal wilting, has often been taken to be synonymous with the programmed death of the constituent cells. PCD also obviously refers to cells, which show a programme leading to their death. Some scientists noted that leaf yellowing, if it has not gone too far, can be reversed. They suggested calling leaf yellowing, before the point of no return, 'senescence' and the process after it 'PCD'. However, this runs into several problems. It is counter to the historical definitions of senescence, both in animal and plant science, which stipulate that senescence is programmed and directly ends in death. It would also mean that only leaves and shoots show senescence, whereas several other plant parts, where reversal has not (yet) been shown, have no senescence, but only PCD. This conflicts with ordinary usage (as in root and flower senescence). Moreover, a programme can be reversible and therefore it is not counter to logic to regard the cell death programme as potentially reversible. In green leaf cells a decision to die, in a programmed way, has been taken, in principle, before the cells start to remobilize their contents (that is, before visible yellowing) and only rarely is this decision reversed. According to the arguments developed here there are no good reasons to separate a senescence phase and a subsequent PCD phase. Rather, it is asserted, senescence in cells is the same as PCD and the two are fully synchronous.     

Programmed Cell Death in Relation to Petal Senescence in Ornamental Plants

Cell death is a common event in all types of plant organisms. Understanding the phenomenon of programmed cell death (PCD) is an important area of research for plant scientists because of its role in senescence and the post-harvest quality of ornamentals, fruits, and vegetables. In the present paper, PCD in relation to petal senescence in ornamental plants is reviewed. Morphological, anatomical, physiological,and biochemical changes that are related to PCD in petals, such as water content, sink-source relationships,hormones, genes, and signal transduction pathways, are discussed. Several approaches to improving the quality of post-harvest ornamentals are reviewed and some prospects for future research are given.     

Programmed Cell Death in Relation to Petal Senescence in Ornamental Plants

Cell death is a common event in all types of plant organisms. Understanding the phenomenon of programmed cell death (PCD) is an important area of research for plant scientists because of its role in senescence and the post-harvest quality of ornamentals, fruits, and vegetables. In the present paper, PCD in relation to petal senescence in ornamental plants is reviewed. Morphological, anatomical, physiological,and biochemical changes that are related to PCD in petals, such as water content, sink-source relationships,hormones, genes, and signal transduction pathways, are discussed, Several approaches to improving the quality of post-harvest ornamentals are reviewed and some prospects for future research are given.     

乙烯和1-氨基环丙烷-1-羧酸合酶基因参与玫瑰花发育过程中细胞程序化死亡的调控

作为植物有性繁殖器官--花的花瓣通常生命周期短,其中有一个敏感的、严格控制的细胞程序化死亡过程.为了揭示细胞程序化死亡过程中发生的反应或者其组成成分,解释玫瑰花发育过程中的细胞程序化死亡过程的机理,测定了在整个花发育过程中玫瑰花瓣的乙烯释放速率、ACC合酶基因的转录产物(mRNA)、ACC合酶活性以及ACC含量.结果显示在花发育过程前期(阶段1、2)检测不到乙烯产生,在花瓣完全绽开时花瓣中乙烯开始产生.在花发育后期(阶段4、5)花的衰老与乙烯释放速率的升高同时发生.在花发育前期没有ACC合酶基因的转录产物积累,该基因在花瓣完全绽开时开始表达,在花发育后期逐渐增强.ACC合酶活性与ACC含量的变化趋势与乙烯的一致.在玫瑰花发育后期乙烯诱导和调控花瓣的细胞程序化死亡.ACC合酶基因、ACC合酶以及ACC都是玫瑰花瓣程序化死亡过程中的重要调控因子.     

Apoptotic-like programmed cell death in plants

Programmed cell death (PCD) is now accepted as a fundamental cellular process in plants. It is involved in defence, development and response to stress, and our understanding of these processes would be greatly improved through a greater knowledge of the regulation of plant PCD. However, there may be several types of PCD that operate in plants, and PCD research findings can be confusing if they are not assigned to a specific type of PCD. The various cell-death mechanisms need therefore to be carefully described and defined. This review describes one of these plant cell death processes, namely the apoptotic-like PCD (AL-PCD). We begin by examining the hallmark 'apoptotic-like' features (protoplast condensation, DNA degradation) of the cell's destruction that are characteristic of AL-PCD, and include examples of AL-PCD during the plant life cycle. The review explores the possible cellular 'executioners' (caspase-like molecules; mitochondria; de novo protein synthesis) that are responsible for the hallmark features of the cellular destruction. Finally, senescence is used as a case study to show that a rigorous definition of cell-death processes in plant cells can help to resolve arguments that occur in the scientific literature regarding the timing and control of plant cell death.