去除和添加凋落物对木荷林土壤呼吸的短期影响

凋落物作为土壤呼吸的重要碳源,其输入的数量和质量将对土壤呼吸产生重要影响。自2011年2月—2012年5月,在浙江天童森林生态系统设置对照、去除和加倍凋落物处理,研究不同凋落物处理对木荷(Schima superba)林土壤呼吸速率、土壤温度和土壤含水量的影响。结果表明:去除和加倍凋落物对土壤温度的影响不显著,对土壤含水量的影响显著,相比对照的土壤呼吸速率2.52±0.29μmol·m-2·s-1,去除凋落物使土壤呼吸速率显著降低了25.32%;而加倍凋落物处理与对照之间的土壤呼吸速率无显著差异。不同凋落物处理下土壤呼吸均表现出明显的季节变化,凋落物处理在湿季对土壤呼吸速率的影响接近显著(P=0.065),在干季不显著,并且湿季的土壤呼吸速率显著高于干季。不同凋落物处理的土壤呼吸速率与土壤温度均呈显著相关,土壤温度解释了土壤呼吸速率变异程度的80.1%~90.3%,Q10值分别为2.42、2.48和2.24;而土壤呼吸速率与土壤含水量之间的相关性不显著。研究结果表明,短期凋落物处理对土壤呼吸产生了影响,并且这种影响因季节差异而不同,证明了凋落物对于改变森林生态系统土壤呼吸和碳循环具有重要作用。     

暖温带麻栎林凋落物调节土壤碳排放通量对降雨脉冲的响应

凋落物既是森林生态系统养分循环的重要构件,又是森林土壤环境和功能的关键调节因子。降雨脉冲导致的土壤碳排放变异是陆地生态系统碳汇能力评价的不确定性来源之一。凋落物在调节土壤碳排放对降雨脉冲的响应中的作用仍缺乏科学的评价。通过在暖温带栎类落叶阔叶林中设置不同凋落物处理(对照、去除凋落物和加倍凋落物)和降雨模拟实验以阐明凋落物数量变化对土壤呼吸脉冲的影响。结果表明：模拟降雨脉冲之前,不同凋落物处理下的土壤呼吸存在显著差异;与对照相比,加倍凋落物导致土壤呼吸速率显著增加57.6%,然而,去除凋落物则对土壤呼吸无显著影响。模拟降雨后52小时内,对照、去除凋落物和加倍凋落物样方的土壤累积碳排放量分别为251.69 gC/m~2,250.93 gC/m~2和409.01 gC/m~2,加倍凋落物处理下的土壤碳排放量显著高于对照和去除凋落物处理;然而,去除凋落物与对照之间无显著差异。此外,不同凋落物处理下土壤呼吸的脉冲持续时间存在显著差异;加倍凋落物显著提高降雨后土壤呼吸脉冲的持续时间,分别比对照和去除凋落物高出262%和158%。多元逐步回归分析表明,土壤总碳排放通量和土壤呼吸的脉冲持续时间与土壤理...     

改变C源输入对油松人工林土壤呼吸的影响

2010年生长季,采用不同处理（去凋切根、去除凋落物、对照、切除根系、加倍凋落物）研究土壤C源输入方式对油松人工林土壤呼吸速率及5 cm土壤温湿度的影响。结果表明：改变C源输入对土壤温度产生的差异不显著（P>0.05）,而对土壤湿度和土壤呼吸速率产生的差异显著（P<0.05）。整个观测期去凋切根、去凋、对照、切根及加倍凋落物处理的土壤呼吸速率平均值分别为1.54,1.71,2.71,2.47和3.39 ?mol m-2 s-1。相比对照样方土壤呼吸,去凋切根处理使油松人工林整个观测期土壤呼吸速率平均降低（44.27 2.31）%;去除凋落物使土壤呼吸速率平均降低（36.03 2.64）%;切除根系使土壤呼吸速率平均降低（10.76 3.26）%,但试验初期切除根系表现为增加土壤呼吸,6月下旬和7月中旬分别使土壤呼吸增加25.91%和0.29%,此后,切除根系使土壤呼吸速率显著降低。如果排除6月和7月的数据,则切除根系使土壤呼吸速率平均降低21.90%;加倍凋落物使土壤呼吸速率平均增加（21.01 3.21）%。去凋切根、去凋、切根和加倍凋落物处理土壤呼吸的温度敏感系数Q10值分别为1.75,1.65,2.32和3.10,四者之间差异均显著（P<0.05）,对照样方土壤呼吸的Q10值为2.23。不同处理土壤呼吸速率与土壤温度均呈显著指数相关（P<0.001）,而与土壤湿度的相关性并不显著（P>0.05）。土壤温度和水分的双变量模型均可以很好地解释土壤呼吸的季节变化,拟合方程的R2值范围为0.49—0.83。     

间伐和凋落物处理对华北落叶松人工林土壤磷形态的影响

土壤磷在维持生态系统功能稳定性中发挥重要作用,研究间伐和凋落物处理下的土壤磷组分特征及转化机理,对森林生态系统磷素管理和可持续发展具有重要意义。采用Tiessen改良的Hedley分级方法,探究了不同间伐强度(未间伐、轻度间伐、中度间伐、重度间伐)和凋落物处理(对照、加倍、去凋、切根去凋)下土壤磷形态的变化特征及其驱动因子。结果显示:随着间伐强度的增大,土壤活性磷(Resin-Pi、NaHCO_3-Pi和NaHCO_3-Po)、土壤微生物量磷和酸性磷酸酶活性呈先增加后降低的趋势,且在中度间伐最高。凋落物加倍(DL)显著增加了土壤活性磷(Resin-Pi、NaHCO_3-Pi和NaHCO_3-Po)、土壤微生物量磷和酸性磷酸酶活性。稳定态磷(HCl-Pi、浓HCl-Pi和浓HCl-Po)、残留态磷(Residual-P)不受间伐和凋落物处理的影响。冗余分析(RDA)显示,土壤微生物量磷、酸性磷酸酶活性和土壤有机碳是引起华北落叶松人工林表层土壤磷组分变化的重要因子。研究表明,适度的间伐和增加凋落物能够显著提高华北落叶松人工林表层土壤磷素的活化能力。本研究为华北落叶松人工林的可持续经营提供依据。     

亚热带杉木和米老排人工林土壤呼吸对凋落物去除和交换的响应

在我国亚热带地区米老排(Mytilaria laosensis)和杉木(Cunninghamia lanceolata)人工林中设置去除凋落物、交换凋落物和对照3种处理,利用LI-8100对不同处理土壤呼吸速率进行为期14个月的连续观测。结果表明:与对照相比,去除和交换凋落物导致米老排人工林CO2年排放量显著减少29.8%和14.2%,杉木人工林则分别减少6.1%和增加37.8%。两种林分交换凋落物处理产生了不同程度的激发效应,米老排凋落物相对于杉木凋落物具有更大的激发效应。不同处理土壤呼吸速率均与土壤温度呈显著指数关系,与土壤含水量呈负相关,土壤温度和含水量的回归模型可以分别解释米老排人工林中去除、交换和对照处理土壤呼吸速率的68.9%、77.0%和69.6%,杉木人工林的53.0%、36.2%和63.8%。两种林分不同处理土壤呼吸速率与土壤可溶性有机碳含量、微生物生物量碳含量以及主要微生物种群生物量显著相关。米老排人工林去除和交换凋落物处理均降低了土壤呼吸的温度敏感性Q10值,而杉木林中仅去除凋落物降低了Q10值。研究表明,土壤呼吸对凋落物输入方式改变的响应因树种而异,这种差异与凋落物输入的数量和质量及其对土壤易变性有机碳含量和微生物生物量的影响有关。     

川西亚高山粗枝云杉人工林地上凋落物对土壤呼吸的贡献

采用Li-8100土壤碳通量分析仪对川西亚高山典型的粗枝云杉(Picea asperata)人工林土壤呼吸(凋落物去除和对照)及其环境因子进行为期1年的连续观测。结果表明:凋落物去除处理和对照土壤呼吸速率均具有显著的季节动态变化,并呈现一致的动态特征,变动范围分别为0.35—4.39μmol m-2s-1和0.40—5.15μmol m-2s-1。整个观测期间,凋落物去除对土壤温度、水分以及土壤呼吸速率产生的差异均不显著。与对照相比,凋落物去除分别使土壤呼吸速率和土壤水分平均下降了14.21%和4.95%。两种处理的土壤呼吸速率和土壤温度均呈显著指数相关,与土壤水分呈显著线性相关。凋落物去除和对照的土壤温度敏感性(Q10)分别为3.84和4.09。凋落物对土壤呼吸速率的年均贡献率为14.93%,且存在明显季节动态。可见,地表凋落物是亚高山森林土壤呼吸的重要组成部分。     

改变凋落物输入对杉木人工林土壤呼吸的短期影响

从2007年1月至12月, 在长沙天际岭国家森林公园, 通过改变杉木林凋落物输入, 研究杉木(Cunninghamia lanceolata)人工林群落去除凋落物、加倍凋落物土壤呼吸速率及5 cm土壤温、湿度的季节变化。结果表明: 去除和加倍凋落物对土壤温度和湿度产生的差异不显著(p>0.05), 对土壤呼吸全年产生的差异接近显著(Marginal significant)(p=0.058)。按植物生长期分别分析, 去除和加倍凋落物对土壤呼吸产生的差异, 在生长旺盛期差异显著(p=0.003), 在生长非旺盛期差异性不显著(p=0.098)。去除凋落物年均土壤呼吸速率为159.2 mg CO₂·m^-2·h^-1, 比对照处理土壤呼吸速率(180.9 mg CO₂·m^-2·h^-1)低15.0%, 加倍凋落物的土壤呼吸为216.8 mg CO₂·m^-2·h^-1, 比对照处理高17.0%。去除和加倍凋落物土壤呼吸季节动态趋势与5 cm深度土壤温度相似, 它们之间呈显著指数相关, 模拟方程分别为: y=27.33e^{0.087 2t}(R²=0.853, p＜0.001), y=37.25e^{0.088 8t}(R²=0.896, p＜0.001)。去除和加倍凋落物的Q₁₀值分别为2.39和2.43, 均比对照2.26大。去除和加倍凋落物土壤呼吸与土壤湿度之间关系不显著(p>0.05)。这一结果使我们能够在较短时间内观察到改变凋落物输入对土壤呼吸的影响, 证明凋落物是影响土壤CO₂通量的重要因子之一。     

凋落物去除/保留对杉木人工林林窗和林内土壤呼吸的影响

为探讨去除/保留凋落物对林窗内外杉木人工林土壤呼吸的影响、明确去除/保留凋落物条件下杉木人工林林窗内外土壤呼吸主要影响因子,改进经营管理措施和保持杉木人工林的可持续发展,在福州白沙国有林场内选取本底基本相同和经营措施接近的12年生杉木人工林及其林窗,分别采用去除和保留凋落物处理,在每月晴好天气通过Licor-8100A对其凋落物量、土壤呼吸、土壤温度、湿度进行了1a(2014年3月—2015年2月)的定点观测,在此基础上分析不同凋落物输入量处理下杉木人工林窗内外土壤呼吸与环境因子的动态特征、土壤呼吸和环境因子关系,结合方差分析等解释土壤呼吸的拟合模型,结果表明:1)杉木林林窗、林内土壤呼吸速率年平均值分别为2.47μmol m~(-2)s~(-1)和2.13μmol m~(-2)s~(-1);去除凋落物后,分别减少了22.89%、25.89%;林窗内外均是7月份出现最大值,去除凋落物后分别为(3.65±0.14)μmol m~(-2)s~(-1)和(2.85±0.08)μmol m~(-2)s~(-1);保留凋落物分别为(4.26±0.34)μmol m~(-2)s~(-1)和(3.61±0.34)μmol m~(-2)s~(-1);1月值最小,去除凋落物分别为(0.9±0.04)μmol m~(-2)s~(-1)和(0.83±0.03)μmol m~(-2)s~(-1),保留凋落物分别为(1.02±0.041)μmol m~(-2)s~(-1)和(0.92±0.05)μmol m~(-2)s~(-1)。2)土壤温度和湿度共同解释了杉木人工林林窗内外土壤呼吸68.63%—77.28%;3)林窗、林内去除和保留凋落物处理的土壤呼吸与土壤5cm深的温、湿度间显著相关;4)林窗、林内土壤温、湿度的双因素模型均比单因素模型能更好地解释土壤呼吸的动态变化。林窗、林内去除凋落物的土壤呼吸温度敏感系数Q10值分别为1.39和1.37,差异不显著(P=0.634);保留凋落物的Q10值分别为1.40和1.55,差异显著(P=0.010)。研究结果为揭示杉木人工森林生态系统碳通量以及其驱动机制提供理论基础。     

落叶松人工林凋落物与土壤肥力变化的研究

以东北东部山区帽儿山实验林场落叶松人工林作为研究对象,从林地凋落量、林地凋落物归还量、凋落物层现存量以及土壤理化性质的变化等方面,研究了经抚育间伐后不同年龄阶段同一落叶松林分土壤肥力的变化以及间伐与未间伐林分土壤理化性质的差异．结果表明,落叶松人工林凋落量和以凋落物形式归还于林地的营养元素呈现出随年龄增加而增长的总趋势．经抚育间伐后,由于阔叶树种的引入使凋落物的组成结构发生变化,凋落物层的分解率逐步提高,加速了凋落物中营养物质的释放和归还,减缓了凋落物积累与分解的矛盾,提高了落叶松人工林的土壤肥力．１５年间土壤有机质、全Ｎ和全Ｐ２Ｏ５平均值分别增长了３５２．００％、２２５．５３％和３４．９６％．间伐后的落叶松人工林土壤的理化性质得到不同程度的改善．     

寒温带兴安落叶松林凋落物层对土壤呼吸的影响

为了进一步探讨土壤凋落物层对土壤呼吸的影响,用Li-6400对大兴安岭北部3种林型(白桦-落叶松林、樟子松-落叶松林和落叶松纯林)自然状态的土壤呼吸(R_S)、去凋落物后的土壤呼吸(R_D)以及凋落物呼吸(R_L)进行测定,结果表明:凋落物层的去除会使土壤呼吸速率降低,3种林型观测期内平均R_S分别为7.32μmol m~(-2) s~(-1)、8.55μmol m~(-2) s~(-1)和6.66μmol m~(-2) s~(-1),平均R_D分别为6.46μmol m~(-2) s~(-1)、7.98μmol m~(-2) s~(-1)和5.74μmol m~(-2) s~(-1)。但去除凋落物后的土壤总呼吸速率较自然状态下分别升高了13.85%、16.21%和13.73%;凋落物的去除并不影响土壤呼吸的季节动态规律,3种林型的R_S和R_D均呈明显的单峰曲线变化规律,峰值均出现在8月,而R_L的季节变化不明显。凋落物的去除对土壤温度和湿度的影响不显著(P0.05),整个观测期3种林型内凋落物去除后平均土壤温度升高了0.11—0.16℃,平均含水量白桦-落叶松林和落叶松林增幅为2.92%和3.10%,而樟子松-落叶松林则下降了16.39%;R_S和R_D均与土壤10 cm温度(T_(10))呈显著正相关,凋落物层的去除使温度对呼吸的影响变大,T_(10)可以解释3种林型R_S和R_D季节变化的49.7%—57.0%和56.7%—61.3%,而土壤10 cm湿度(W_(10))对土壤呼吸的影响均较小,且存在林型间的差异。可见,地表凋落物层是森林土壤呼吸的重要部分,凋落物层的有无对土壤呼吸和土壤温湿度都会产生较大影响,研究凋落物呼吸对于土壤呼吸具有重要意义。     

Grazing exclusion reduced soil respiration but increased its temperature sensitivity in a Meadow Grassland on the Tibetan Plateau

Understanding anthropogenic influences on soil respiration (R_s) is critical for accurate predictions of soil carbon fluxes, but it is not known how R_s responds to grazing exclusion (GE). Here, we conducted a manipulative experiment in a meadow grassland on the Tibetan Plateau to investigate the effects of GE on R_s. The exclusion of livestock significantly increased soil moisture and above‐ground biomass, but it decreased soil temperature, microbial biomass carbon (MBC), and R_s. Regression analysis indicated that the effects of GE on R_s were mainly due to changes in soil temperature, soil moisture, and MBC. Compared with the grazed blocks, GE significantly decreased soil carbon release by 23.6% over the growing season and 21.4% annually, but it increased the temperature sensitivity (Q₁₀) of R_s by 6.5% and 14.2% for the growing season and annually respectively. Therefore, GE may reduce the release of soil carbon from the Tibetan Plateau, but under future climate warming scenarios, the increases in Q₁₀ induced by GE could lead to increased carbon emissions.     

Forest soil respiration and exoenzyme activity in western North America following thinning,residue removal for biofuel production,and compensatory soil amendments

Cellulosic biofuel from forest thinning operations is a potential renewable energy source in regions with overstocked forests such as those in western United States. However, it is possible that biomass removal can deplete nutrients from soil, which can alter soil respiration (R_s) and exoenzyme properties, and potentially impact tree growth. This study evaluates the impact of biomass removal on R_s and exoenzyme properties and the capacity of soil amendments to counteract any potential effects. At two study locations, we created four post‐thinning biomass retention levels: full biomass removal (0×), full biomass retention (1×), double biomass retention (2×), and a no‐thin treatment. Four soil amendment treatments were applied to each biomass retention level: N fertilizer (F), biochar (B), fertilizer plus biochar (FB), and an untreated control (C). We evaluated treatment effects on R_s and activity of four exoenzymes to represent C‐cycling, N‐release, and P‐release processes. Biomass retention levels had no effect on R_s (p = .42) or exoenzyme activities (p > .29). Variation in exoenzyme activity was explained by location, season, soil organic matter, soil moisture content, and temperature. Variation in R_s was explained by the same variables, in addition to C‐cycling exoenzyme activity and soil pH. Soil amendments had no effect on exoenzyme activities (p > .49), and no main effect on R_s (p = .48), though amendments influenced R_s differently at each location (p = .02). Short‐term findings suggest small‐diameter biomass removal for cellulosic biofuel production will not impact R_s and exoenzyme properties, and paired with our tree growth study, provide evidence that biofuel systems are a feasible renewable energy source in the western North America.     

Effects of soil moisture on the temperature sensitivity of heterotrophic respiration vary seasonally in an old‐field climate change experiment

Microbial decomposition of soil organic matter produces a major flux of CO₂ from terrestrial ecosystems and can act as a feedback to climate change. Although climate‐carbon models suggest that warming will accelerate the release of CO₂ from soils, the magnitude of this feedback is uncertain, mostly due to uncertainty in the temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition. We examined how warming and altered precipitation affected the rate and temperature sensitivity of heterotrophic respiration (R_h) at the Boston‐Area Climate Experiment, in Massachusetts, USA. We measured R_h inside deep collars that excluded plant roots and litter inputs. In this mesic ecosystem, R_h responded strongly to precipitation. Drought reduced R_h, both annually and during the growing season. Warming increased R_h only in early spring. During the summer, when R_h was highest, we found evidence of threshold, hysteretic responses to soil moisture: R_h decreased sharply when volumetric soil moisture dropped below ~15% or exceeded ~26%, but R_h increased more gradually when soil moisture rose from the lower threshold. The effect of climate treatments on the temperature sensitivity of R_h depended on the season. Apparent Q₁₀ decreased with high warming (~3.5 °C) in spring and fall. Presumably due to limiting soil moisture, warming and precipitation treatments did not affect apparent Q₁₀ in summer. Drought decreased apparent Q₁₀ in fall compared to ambient and wet precipitation treatments. To our knowledge, this is the first field study to examine the response of R_h and its temperature sensitivity to the combined effects of warming and altered precipitation. Our results highlight the complex responses of R_h to soil moisture, and to our knowledge identify for the first time the seasonal variation in the temperature sensitivity of microbial respiration in the field. We emphasize the importance of adequately simulating responses such as these when modeling trajectories of soil carbon stocks under climate change scenarios.     

A cross‐biome synthesis of soil respiration and its determinants under simulated precipitation changes

Soil respiration (R_s) is the second‐largest terrestrial carbon (C) flux. Although R_s has been extensively studied across a broad range of biomes, there is surprisingly little consensus on how the spatiotemporal patterns of R_s will be altered in a warming climate with changing precipitation regimes. Here, we present a global synthesis R_s data from studies that have manipulated precipitation in the field by collating studies from 113 increased precipitation treatments, 91 decreased precipitation treatments, and 14 prolonged drought treatments. Our meta‐analysis indicated that when the increased precipitation treatments were normalized to 28% above the ambient level, the soil moisture, R_s, and the temperature sensitivity (Q₁₀) values increased by an average of 17%, 16%, and 6%, respectively, and the soil temperature decreased by ?1.3%. The greatest increases in R_s and Q₁₀ were observed in arid areas, and the stimulation rates decreased with increases in climate humidity. When the decreased precipitation treatments were normalized to 28% below the ambient level, the soil moisture and R_s values decreased by an average of ?14% and ?17%, respectively, and the soil temperature and Q₁₀ values were not altered. The reductions in soil moisture tended to be greater in more humid areas. Prolonged drought without alterations in the amount of precipitation reduced the soil moisture and R_s by ?12% and ?6%, respectively, but did not alter Q₁₀. Overall, our synthesis suggests that soil moisture and R_s tend to be more sensitive to increased precipitation in more arid areas and more responsive to decreased precipitation in more humid areas. The responses of R_s and Q₁₀ were predominantly driven by precipitation‐induced changes in the soil moisture, whereas changes in the soil temperature had limited impacts. Finally, our synthesis of prolonged drought experiments also emphasizes the importance of the timing and frequency of precipitation events on ecosystem C cycles. Given these findings, we urge future studies to focus on manipulating the frequency, intensity, and seasonality of precipitation with an aim to improving our ability to predict and model feedback between R_s and climate change.     

模拟氮沉降凋落物管理对樟树人工林土壤呼吸的影响

以湖南省植物园樟树人工林为对象,研究了模拟氮沉降下,不同凋落物处理对土壤呼吸的影响。设置4个施氮水平,分别为CK(0 kg N hm~(-2)a~(-1))、LN(50 kg N hm~(-2)a~(-1))、NM(150 kg N hm~(-2)a~(-1))以及HN(300 kg N hm~(-2)a~(-1));凋落物处理分别为去除凋落物、添加凋落物以及凋落物对照组。经过为期2年的观测研究,结果表明:(1)模拟氮沉降不同凋落物处理下,土壤温度呈现显著的季节性变化,但不存在显著差异;土壤湿度呈现显著的波动性变化,施氮及凋落物管理对土壤温度无影响。土壤湿度仅受凋落物管理的影响。在不同施氮水平下,去除凋落物的土壤湿度与加倍凋落物的土壤湿度均存在显著差异性。(2)模拟氮沉降不同凋落物处理下,土壤呼吸均呈现显著的季节性变化,最大值出现在6—8月;最小值出现在1月,且在生长季期间(4—8月),不同处理下土壤呼吸存在显著差异。(3)施氮对土壤呼吸表现为抑制作用,添加凋落物对土壤呼吸起促进作用,去除凋落物对土壤呼吸起抑制作用。(4)在凋落物对照组中,LN、MN、HN较CK相比,土壤呼吸速率年均值分别降低了35.4%、30.6%、36.8%,且各施氮水平与CK存在显著差异(P0.05);添加凋落物处理下,LN、MN、HN处理较CK相比,土壤呼吸速率年均值土壤呼吸分别降低了23.2%、15.8%、14.7%。去除凋落物处理下,LN、MN、HN较CK相比,土壤呼吸速率年均值分别降低了3.5%、0.5%、-11.6%。且添加或去除凋落物均能削弱施氮对土壤呼吸的抑制作用,且这种作用随着施氮水平的增加而增大。(5)土壤呼吸与5 cm处土壤温度存在显著相关性(P0.05),土壤温度可解释土壤呼吸变异的47.76%—72.61%;与土壤湿度呈现正相关,但未达到显著相关水平(P0.05)。     

氮添加和凋落物去除对黔中喀斯特地区柳杉人工林土壤呼吸的影响

凋落物是土壤呼吸的主要碳源,日益增加的大气氮沉降通过改变森林凋落物的输入与分解影响土壤呼吸。为揭示氮沉降及凋落物管理对森林土壤呼吸及其组分的影响,以贵州省国有扎佐林场15年生柳杉人工林为研究对象,设置4个氮添加处理:对照(CK,0 gN m^-2 a^-1)、低氮(LN,15 gN m^-2 a^-1)、中氮(MN,30 gN m^-2 a^-1)和高氮(HN,60 gN m^-2 a^-1),并在每种氮添加处理下设置去除凋落物和保留凋落物两种处理,于2021年3月-2022年2月利用LI-8100测定土壤呼吸速率,并分析氮添加及凋落物处理对土壤呼吸速率影响,确定影响土壤呼吸速率变化的主要因子。结果表明:氮添加和去除凋落物处理没有改变土壤呼吸速率的时间变化,土壤呼吸速率月均最大值出现在7月,月均最小值出现在2月。氮添加对土壤呼吸速率无显著影响(P > 0.05),除CK外,去除凋落物处理会显著降低土壤呼吸速率(P < 0.05)。凋落物对土壤总呼吸速率的贡献率为8.6%-28.5%,且LN处理下凋落物对土壤呼吸速率的贡献率最大。土壤呼吸速率与5 m土壤温度呈显著指数相关(P < 0.01),与5 cm土壤湿度呈显著负线性相关(P < 0.01)。土壤温度解释了土壤呼吸速率变异的58.5%-79.5%,土壤湿度解释了土壤呼吸速率变异的26.4%-39.5%,以土壤温度和湿度构建的双变量模型拟合效果均好于单因子模型,土壤温湿度共同解释土壤呼吸速率变异的59.1%-85.8%。结论表明在大气氮沉降增加的背景下,温度是影响土壤呼吸的主要因素,凋落物管理是调控土壤呼吸的关键过程。     

The effects of heating,rhizosphere, and depth on root litter decomposition are mediated by soil moisture

The breakdown and decomposition of plant inputs are critical for nutrient cycling, soil development, and climate-ecosystem feedbacks, but uncertainties persist in how the rates and products of litter decomposition are affected by soil temperature, rhizosphere, and depth of input. We investigated the effects of soil warming (+ 4 °C), rhizosphere, and depth of litter placement on the decomposition of Avena fatua (wild oat grass) root litter in a Mediterranean grassland ecosystem. Field lysimeters were subjected to three environmental treatments (heating, control, and plant removal) and three ¹³C-labeled root litter addition treatments (to A horizon, to B horizon, and no-addition disturbance control) for each of two harvest time points. We buried root litter in February 2014 and measured loss of ¹³C in CO₂ from the soil surface and in leachate as dissolved organic carbon (DOC) over two growing seasons. At the end of each growing season we recovered the ¹³C remaining in the soil. Loss of root litter C occurred almost entirely via heterotrophic respiration, with an estimated < 2% lost as DOC during the initial decay period. The added roots were broken down and incorporated into bulk soil material very quickly; only ~ 30% of added root was visible after 6 months. In the first growing season, decomposition occurred faster in the B than in the A horizon, the latter having greater moisture limitation. Subsequently, there was almost no further decomposition in the B horizon. After two growing seasons, less than 20% of the added root litter C remained in the A or B horizons of all environmental treatments. Heating did not stimulate decomposition, likely because it exacerbated the moisture limitation. However, while plots without plants dried down more slowly than plots with plants, their decomposition rate was not significantly greater, possibly due to the lack of rhizosphere processes such as priming. We conclude that in this Mediterranean grassland ecosystem, soil moisture, which is affected by season, depth, heating, and rhizosphere, plays a dominant role in mediating the effect of those factors on root litter decomposition, which after two seasons did not differ by depth or by treatment.     

An analysis of soil respiration across northern hemisphere temperate ecosystems

Over two-thirds of terrestrial carbon is stored belowground and a significant amount of atmospheric CO₂ is respired by roots and microbes in soils. For this analysis, soil respiration (Rs) data were assembled from 31 AmeriFlux and CarboEurope sites representing deciduous broadleaf, evergreen needleleaf, grasslands, mixed deciduous/evergreen and woodland/savanna ecosystem types. Lowest to highest rates of soil respiration averaged over the growing season were grassland and woodland/savanna < deciduous broadleaf forests < evergreen needleleaf, mixed deciduous/evergreen forests with growing season soil respiration significantly different between forested and non-forested biomes (p < 0.001). Timing of peak respiration rates during the growing season varied from March/April in grasslands to July–September for all other biomes. Biomes with overall strongest relationship between soil respiration and soil temperature were from the deciduous and mixed forests (R² ≥ 0.65). Maximum soil respiration was weakly related to maximum fine root biomass (R² = 0.28) and positively related to the previous years’ annual litterfall (R² = 0.46). Published rates of annual soil respiration were linearly related to LAI and fine root carbon (R² = 0.48, 0.47), as well as net primary production (NPP) (R² = 0.44). At 10 sites, maximum growing season Rs was weakly correlated with annual GPP estimated from eddy covariance towersites (R² = 0.29; p < 0.05), and annual soil respiration and total growing season Rs were not correlated with annual GPP (p > 0.1). Yet, previous studies indicate correlations on shorter time scales within site (e.g., weekly, monthly). Estimates of annual GPP from the Biome-BGC model were strongly correlated with observed annual estimates of soil respiration for six sites (R² = 0.84; p < 0.01). Correlations from observations of Rs with NPP, LAI, fine root biomass and litterfall relate above and belowground inputs to labile pools that are available for decomposition. Our results suggest that simple empirical relationships with temperature and/or moisture that may be robust at individual sites may not be adequate to characterize soil CO₂ effluxes across space and time, agreeing with other multi-site studies. Information is needed on the timing and phenological controls of substrate availability (e.g., fine roots, LAI) and inputs (e.g., root turnover, litterfall) to improve our ability to accurately quantify the relationships between soil CO₂ effluxes and carbon substrate storage.For this study, these authors received significant contributions from: M. Aubinet, D. Baldocchi, C. Bernhofer, P. Bolstad, A. Bosc, J.L. Campbell, Y. Cheng, J. Curiel Yuste, P. Curtis, E.A. Davidson, D. Epron, A. Granier, T. Grünwald, D. Hollinger, I.A. Janssens, B. Longdoz, D. Loustau, J. Martin, R. Monson, W. Oechel, J. Pippen, F. Ponti, R. Ryel, K. Savage, L. Scott-Denton, J.-A. Subke, J. Tang, J. Tenhunen, V. Turcu, C. S. Vogel.     

Distinct responses of soil respiration to experimental litter manipulation in temperate woodland and tropical forest

Global change is affecting primary productivity in forests worldwide, and this, in turn, will alter long‐term carbon (C) sequestration in wooded ecosystems. On one hand, increased primary productivity, for example, in response to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂), can result in greater inputs of organic matter to the soil, which could increase C sequestration belowground. On other hand, many of the interactions between plants and microorganisms that determine soil C dynamics are poorly characterized, and additional inputs of plant material, such as leaf litter, can result in the mineralization of soil organic matter, and the release of soil C as CO₂ during so‐called “priming effects”. Until now, very few studies made direct comparison of changes in soil C dynamics in response to altered plant inputs in different wooded ecosystems. We addressed this with a cross‐continental study with litter removal and addition treatments in a temperate woodland (Wytham Woods) and lowland tropical forest (Gigante forest) to compare the consequences of increased litterfall on soil respiration in two distinct wooded ecosystems. Mean soil respiration was almost twice as high at Gigante (5.0 μmol CO₂ m^?2 s^?1) than at Wytham (2.7 μmol CO₂ m^?2 s^?1) but surprisingly, litter manipulation treatments had a greater and more immediate effect on soil respiration at Wytham. We measured a 30% increase in soil respiration in response to litter addition treatments at Wytham, compared to a 10% increase at Gigante. Importantly, despite higher soil respiration rates at Gigante, priming effects were stronger and more consistent at Wytham. Our results suggest that in situ priming effects in wooded ecosystems track seasonality in litterfall and soil respiration but the amount of soil C released by priming is not proportional to rates of soil respiration. Instead, priming effects may be promoted by larger inputs of organic matter combined with slower turnover rates.     

降雨量改变对常绿阔叶林干旱和湿润季节土壤呼吸的影响

通过野外原位试验,研究降雨量改变对华西雨屏区常绿阔叶林干旱和湿润季节土壤呼吸速率的影响。采用LI-8100土壤碳通量分析系统(LI-COR Inc.,USA)测定干旱和湿润季节对照(CK)、增雨10%(LA)、增雨5%(TA)、减雨10%(LR)、减雨20%(MR)、减雨50%(HR)6个处理水平的土壤呼吸速率,并通过回归方程分析温度和湿度与土壤呼吸速率间的关系。结果表明:湿润季节土壤呼吸速率高于干旱季节,HR处理对干旱季节土壤呼吸速率影响较大,而LA处理对湿润季节土壤呼吸速率的影响较大。TA和LR处理使土壤呼吸的温度敏感性增加,而HR、LA和MR处理使土壤呼吸的温度敏感性降低,干旱季节Q10值高于湿润季节。各处理湿润季节土壤微生物量碳氮含量显著高于干旱季节,HR、MR和LA处理减少土壤微生物生物量碳、氮的含量,而TA和LR处理增加土壤微生物生物量碳、氮的含量。与湿润季节相比,干旱季节土壤水分对土壤呼吸速率的影响较大;而与土壤温度相比,土壤水分对土壤呼吸速率的影响较小。在降雨量改变的背景下,华西雨屏区常绿阔叶林无论是干旱还是湿润季节,适当增雨和减雨都会促进土壤呼吸速率,而较高量的增雨和减雨会抑制土壤呼吸速率。