股神经阻滞自控镇痛用于全膝置换术后镇痛和功能恢复的疗效观察

目的:观察股神经阻滞自控镇痛用于全膝置换(total knee arthoplasty,TKA)术后镇痛和功能恢复的疗效。方法:选择2017年8月～2019年6月院骨科收治的膝关节骨性关节炎患者122例,根据随机数字表法将其分为观察组与对照组,每组61例患者。所有患者均采用静吸复合全身麻醉,观察组给予股神经阻滞自控镇痛,对照组给予静脉自控镇痛,记录和比较两组患者术后镇痛效果与功能恢复情况。结果:观察组术后1 d、3 d与7 d的疼痛视觉模拟评分法(Visual Analogue Scale/Score,VAS)评分、血清白细胞介素(Interleukin,IL)-6和C-反应蛋白(C-reactive protein,CRP)含量都显著低于对照组(P0.05),患肢膝关节活动度明显高于对照组(P0.05),术后7 d的恶心、头晕、嗜睡、心动过缓等并发症发生率(4.9%)显著低于对照组(21.3%,P0.05),术后1 d、1个月与3个月的患肢膝关节活动度显著高于对照组(P0.05)。结论:股神经阻滞自控镇痛用于TKA可提高术后镇痛效果,促进膝关节功能恢复,减少术后并发症的发生,可能与其有效抑制IL-6和CRP的释放有关。     

Comparing the efficacy of pain managements after total hip arthroplasty: A network meta-analysis

The aim of our current study is to compare efficiency of various interventions implemented for pain management after total hip arthroplasty (THA). PubMed and EMBASE were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting the pain scales for evaluate the efficacy of pain control after THA including at least one pair of direct control groups. Pain scale values and the associated 95% credible interval (CrI) were used to describe efficacy. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of each means of pain control was calculated to compare the relative ranking of different interventions. Thirty-five eligible literatures were involved in data analysis. The interventions for postoperative pain management we examined were psoas compartment block (PCB), posterior nerve block (PNB), fascia iliaca block (FIB), periarticular injection (PAI), femoral nerve block (FNB), lumbar plexus block (LPB), spinal anesthesia (SA), epidural analgesia (EPI), intrathecal morphine (IA), intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA), patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), onsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), local infiltration analgaesia (LIA), and reverse LIA (rLIA). In 0 to 6 hours analysis, patients under SA were found to have significantly lower pain score and SA was ranked the best. In 6 to 12 hours analysis, SA was found to be significantly more effective than other interventions and its SUCRA was the highest. No intervention showed a significant effect on reducing pain score for 12 to 24 hours and 24 to 48 hours after THA. SA is the best intervention to reduce THA postoperative pain in the first 24 hours. LPB is a better choice to reduce pain 12 to 48 hours after THA.     

股神经阻滞和收肌管阻滞对全膝关节置换术后下肢静脉血栓形成的影响

目的:探究股神经阻滞(femoral nerve block,FNB)和收肌管阻滞(adductor canal block,ACB)对全膝关节置换术(total knee arthroplasty,TKA)后下肢静脉血栓形成的影响。方法:将2019年3月-2019年4月拟在全身麻醉下行全膝关节置换术的40例患者随机分为FNB组和ACB组,所有患者均给予超声引导下单次注射,术后均给予标准化抗凝治疗。术后评估两组患者不同时间节点的疼痛评分、股四头肌肌力及术后下肢静脉血栓形成情况。结果:两组患者术后2、6、12、24、48、72 h患肢术区局部疼痛的VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。ACB组患者术后2、6、12、24、48 h股四头肌肌力均明显高于FNB组(P0.05),术后72 h两组患者股四头肌肌力无明显差异(P0.05)。ACB组在术后患者首次直腿抬高时间(4.5±4.6)h,显著低于FNB组在术后患者首次直腿抬高时间(25.6±12.6)h,两组对比差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。术后72 h给予两组患者复查双下肢血管超声,复查结果显示,FNB组19例患者中共有2例出现下肢静脉血栓,均为肌间隙静脉血栓形成;ACB组20例患者中无患者出现下肢静脉血栓形成,差异无有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:FNB与ACB在全膝关节置换术后镇痛方面无明显差异,但ACB组较好的保留患者术后早期股四头肌肌力,对于术后功能锻炼和快速康复有较积极的作用,两种神经阻滞方式对患者VTE风险的影响相同。     

不同局部浸润镇痛技术对前交叉韧带重建术后患者的镇痛效果

目的:比较关节内与关节周围浸润镇痛对前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)后患者的镇痛效果。方法:选择2014年1月至2015年11月在我院拟行ACLR的前交叉韧带断裂患者40例,将其随机分为关节内浸润镇痛组(IA组)与关节周围浸润镇痛组(PA组),每组20例。两组均于术前3d定时口服塞来昔布(200mg,bid),术前0.5h行股神经阻滞(3.3g/L罗哌卡因30mL)。术中IA组于关节内给予30mL复合镇痛药物,而PA组于关节周围滑膜内注射相同药物。术后均给予24h冰敷治疗。观察两组患者术后12-72h及出院时的静息与活动疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS),术后24-72h及出院时膝关节活动度,记录患者术后吗啡用量及不良反应情况。结果:PA组术后12-72h在静息与活动时以及在出院当天的活动时,VAS评分均显著低于IA组(P0.05)。术后24-72hPA组关节活动度均优于IA组(P0.05)。术后IA组、PA组吗啡镇痛使用率分别为30%、15%,且IA组吗啡平均用量为(10.3±1.1)mg,明显高于PA组的(5.4±0.9)mg(P0.05)。两组不良反应率比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:关节周围浸润镇痛为主的多模式镇痛对ACLR围手术期患者的镇痛效果更好,更有利于关节功能的康复,值得临床推广应用。     

Randomised study of long term outcome after epidural versus non-epidural analgesia during labour

ObjectiveTo determine whether epidural analgesia during labour is associated with long term backache.DesignFollow up after randomised controlled trial. Analysis by intention to treat.SettingDepartment of obstetrics and gynaecology at one NHS trust.Participants369 women: 184 randomised to epidural group (treatment as allocated received by 123) and 185 randomised to non-epidural group (treatment as allocated received by 133). In the follow up study 151 women were from the epidural group and 155 from the non-epidural group.ResultsThere were no significant differences between groups in demographic details or other key characteristics. The mean time interval from delivery to interview was 26 months. There were no significant differences in the onset or duration of low back pain, with nearly a third of women in each group reporting pain in the week before interview. There were no differences in self reported measures of disability in activities of daily living and no significant differences in measurements of spinal mobility.ConclusionsAfter childbirth there are no differences in the incidence of long term low back pain, disability, or movement restriction between women who receive epidural pain relief and women who receive other forms of pain relief.

What is already known on this topic

Previous research has suggested an association between epidural analgesia during labour and low back painIt is not known whether this association is causal

What this study adds

This long term follow up study found no evidence of a causal link between epidural analgesia during labour and low back pain     

骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折经皮椎体后凸成形术中应用不同麻醉方式对疼痛阈值的影响

摘要 目的：探究骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折经皮椎体后凸成形术中应用不同麻醉方式对疼痛阈值的影响。方法：选择120例接受经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗的骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者,并将其随机分为全身麻醉组（n=40）、局部麻醉组（n=40）和硬膜外麻醉组（n=40）。对比分析三组麻醉效果、不同时间点疼痛阈值（VAS值）、疼痛总分（PRI）与疼痛强度（PPI）、温度疼痛阈值和电疼痛阈值以及采取自控镇痛、止痛药的情况。结果：全身麻醉组患者麻醉优良率为95.00 %,局部麻醉组患者麻醉优良率为87.50 %,硬膜外麻醉组患者麻醉优良率为92.50 %。三组患者麻醉效果比较,全身麻醉组显著优于局部麻醉组和硬膜外麻醉组（P<0.05）。随着麻醉时间的延长,硬膜外麻醉组患者在麻醉后的VAS值、PRI和PPI值、温度疼痛阈值和电疼痛阈值均显著低于全身麻醉组和局部麻醉组患者（P<0.05）。全身麻醉组采取其他方式进行止痛的概率为1.67 %,局部麻醉组为30.00 %,硬膜外麻醉组为2.50 %,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：硬膜外麻醉方式对骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折经皮椎体后凸成形术的麻醉效果和镇痛效果较全身麻醉和局部麻醉效果好,值得临床推广使用。     

Epidural Co-Administration of Dexmedetomidine and Levobupivacaine Improves the Gastrointestinal Motility Function after Colonic Resection in Comparison to Co-Administration of Morphine and Levobupivacaine

Gastrointestinal motility may be impaired after intestinal surgery. Epidural morphine is effective in controlling postoperative pain, but can further reduce gastrointestinal motility. Here, we aimed to investigate the effects of epidural dexmedetomidine on gastrointestinal motility in patients undergoing colonic resection. Seventy-four patients undergoing colonic resection were enrolled in this clinical trial and allocated randomly to treatment with dexmedetomidine (D group) or morphine (M group). The D group received a loading dose epidural administration of 3 ml dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg kg^-1) and then a continuous epidural administration of 80 μg dexmedetomidine in 150 ml levobupivacaine (0.125%) at 3 ml h^-1 for two days. The M group received a loading dose epidural administration of 3 ml morphine (0.03 mg kg^-1) and then a continuous epidural administration of 4.5 mg morphine in 150 ml levobupivacaine at 3 ml h^-1 for two days. Verbal rating score (VRS), postoperative analgesic requirements, side effects related to analgesia, the time to postoperative first flatus (FFL) and first feces (FFE) were recorded. VRS and postoperative analgesic requirements were not significantly different between treatment groups. In contrast, the time to FFL and time to FFE were significant longer in M group in comparison to D group (P < 0.05). Moreover, patients in M group had a significantly higher incidence of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus (P < 0.05). No patients showed neurologic deficits in either group. In comparison to morphine, epidural dexmedetomidine is safe and beneficial for the recovery of gastrointestinal motility after colonic resection when used as an adjunct with levobupivacaine for postoperative pain control.

Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-TRC-14004644     

Postoperative analgesia: a comparison of intravenous on-demand fentanyl with epidural bupivacaine.

In a randomised trial postoperative pain relief was provided by either epidural injections of bupivacaine or an infusion of fentanyl adjusted by the patient to achieve adequate pain relief. Both techniques produced satisfactory analgesia without respiratory depression after peripheral arterial surgery. The technique of infusing intravenously a potent analgesic in a dose adjusted by the patient appears to offer several advantages in postoperative care.     

平行侧入法硬膜外穿刺CSEA对剖宫产术后腰背痛的影响

目的:探讨平行侧入法硬膜外穿刺腰硬联合麻醉对剖宫产术后腰背痛的影响。方法:选择2014年10月至2016年9月在我院行剖宫产的产妇95例,将其随机分为两组。对照组45例,产妇接受平行直入法硬膜外穿刺腰硬联合麻醉,观察组50例产妇接受平行侧入法硬膜外穿刺麻醉。比较两组产妇术后宫缩、伤口、腰背疼痛VAS评分、术中穿刺情况、术后使用镇痛泵的有效按压次数及术后3 d、7 d、14 d和2个月后腰背疼痛的情况。结果:观察组产妇术后宫缩、伤口以及腰背疼痛评分、术后使用镇痛泵的有效按压次数均显著低于对照组(P0.05),且术中一次性穿刺成功率显著高于对照组(P0.05),且术后7 d、14 d以及2个月腰背痛的发生率显著低于对照组(P0.05)。结论:平行侧入穿刺法行腰硬联合麻醉可有效提高剖宫产产妇一次穿刺成功率,显著缓解产妇的术后疼痛,并降低术后腰背疼痛的发生率。     

腰硬联合麻醉在下肢骨折手术对WBC、CRP、ALB、PCT的影响

摘要 目的：通过腰硬联合麻醉在下肢骨折手术中对白细胞(white blood cell,WBC)、白蛋白(albumin,ALB)、C-反应蛋白(C-reactive protein,CRP)、降钙素原(procalcitonin,PCT)的影响分析,探讨腰硬联合麻醉在下肢骨折手术中的应用价值。方法：选取本院2018年12月到2019年10月择期髋部骨折手术的老年患者88例,按不同麻醉方法分为观察组（n=48）与对照组（n=40）;对照组为全身麻醉,观察组为腰硬联合麻醉,以WBC、CRP、ALB、PCT为观察指标,结合术后疼痛及术中麻醉效果对腰硬联合麻醉在下肢骨折手术中的应用进行分析评价。结果：观察组术后4 h、24 h、48 h的静息疼痛评分都显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组的感觉阻滞时间、阻滞完善时间、痛觉恢复时间都显著短于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组术后1 d、7 d的WBC、ALB值与对照组对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组术后1 d、7 d的血清CRP、PCT含量都显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论：腰硬联合麻醉在下肢骨折手术中的应用并不会影响WBC、ALB的表达,但可减轻CRP、PCT的血浓度,能更好的提高麻醉效果,发挥镇痛作用,延长术后无痛时间,从而促进患者的康复。     

帕瑞昔布钠在术后镇痛中应用的研究进展

手术方式的不断完善和创新,对术后镇痛提出了更高要求。非甾体抗炎药为我国临床术后镇痛常用的一类药物,近年来应用范围仍在不断扩大,但总结长期术后镇痛用药经验发现,传统的非甾体抗炎药易引起胃肠道毒性反应和血小板抑制,因此迫切需要寻找一种安全、有效的术后镇痛药物。帕瑞昔布钠是一种环氧合酶-2(COX-2)特异性抑制剂,注射使用,可用于术后不同程度疼痛的短期治疗,近年来已被临床实践证实具有良好的疗效和较高的安全性。本文结合已经发表的临床研究报道对该药物在术后镇痛中的应用进展进行综述,旨在对该药物的作用机制、疗效、安全性有一个系统性的认识。     

Analysis of preincisional and postincisional treatment with alpha2-adrenoreceptor agonist clonidine regarding analgesic consumption and hemodynamic stability in surgical patients

Preemptive analgesia aims to prevent the sensitization of central nervous system, hence the development of pathologic pain after tissular injury. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of preincisional clonidine treatment on analgesic consumption and hemodynamic stability compared to clonidine administered at the end of the operation and control group. Ninety-one patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery were randomly assigned to four groups: peroral clonidine before operation, epidural clonidine before operation, epidural clonidine at the end of operation, and epidural saline before operation as a control group. After the operation, patient-controlled analgesia with epidural morphine was instituted. Analgesic consumption, blood pressure and heart rate were obtained at 1, 2, 6 and 24 h postoperatively, and the cumulative consumption of analgesics was assessed at the end of the study period. Significant differences (p < 0.05) in postoperative systolic blood pressure, with highest hemodynamic stability was observed at 1 h and 6 h in the group of patients administered epidural clonidine before operation. In this group of patients we found significant reduction in analgesic consumption during the study period (p < 0.05), compared to other groups. The cumulative consumption of analgesics assessed at the end of the study period was significantly reduced (p < 0.05) in the group of patients administered epidural clonidine before operation (8.40 +/- 3.74, respectively) as compared with the peroral clonidine before operation (16.79 +/- 5.75, respectively), epidural clonidine at the end of the operation (11.11 +/- 4.24, respectively) and control group of patients (18.00 +/- 6.45, respectively). Preincisional administration of epidural clonidine was associated with a significantly lower analgesic use, lower cumulative analgesic consumption and greater hemodynamic stability, in comparison with other groups.     

全麻术后患者苏醒期躁动发生情况及影响因素分析

目的:统计全麻术后患者苏醒期躁动(EA)的发生率,并分析其影响因素。方法:本研究为回顾性研究,分析2021年5月~2021年6月期间我院收治的204例全麻手术患者的临床资料,采用躁动-镇静程度量表(RASS)评分评价患者术后是否发生EA,观察全麻术后患者EA发生率,并根据患者术后是否发生EA进行分组,采用logistic回归分析其影响因素。结果:204例患者中有47例发生EA,发生率为23.04%,纳为EA组,剩余的157例未发生EA,纳为非EA组。EA组、非EA组在性别、全麻方式、术前用药、苏醒时间方面对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。EA组、非EA组在年龄、手术类型、手术时间、留置胃管/导尿管、麻醉时间、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、术后镇痛、术后疼痛方面对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄≥50岁、手术类型为妇科手术或泌尿外科手术、留置胃管/导尿管、ASA分级为Ⅱ级、术后疼痛是EA发生的危险因素,而术后镇痛是EA发生的保护因素(P<0.05)。结论:年龄、手术类型、留置胃管/导尿管、ASA分级、术后疼痛、术后镇痛是全麻术后患者EA发生的影响因素,临床需重点关注并给予相应防控措施。     

不同麻醉方式对老年糖尿病患者全膝置换术后糖代谢的影响

目的:探讨不同麻醉方式对老年糖尿病患者全膝置换术(total knee arthoplasty,TKA)后糖代谢的影响。方法:2018年2月到2020年3月选择在本院进行择期TKA的老年糖尿病合并膝关节骨性关节炎患者88例,随机原则分为研究组与对照组,各44例。对照组给予常规静吸复合全身麻醉,研究组在对照组麻醉的基础上给予复合股神经阻滞,检测两组术后空腹血糖值,并记录两组膝关节功能改善情况。结果:研究组术后1 d、3 d与7 d静息状态下和活动状态下的疼痛视觉模拟评分法(Visual Analogue Scale/Score,VAS)评分都显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组术后1 d、3 d与7 d的空腹血糖值都显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组术后1 d、3 d与7 d的患肢膝关节活动度都显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:股神经阻滞联合全麻在老年糖尿病患者TKA中的应用能缓解术后疼痛,减低术后血糖水平,并且促进提高膝关节活动度有益预后。     

持续镇痛分娩对产妇分娩结局和新生儿评分的影响

目的:研究持续镇痛分娩对产妇分娩结局和新生儿评分的影响。方法:选择2018年7月～2019年7月中国医科大学航空总医院(本院)采取硬膜外分娩镇痛的101例产妇,将其随机分为两组。当产生确切的镇痛效果,进入第二产程后,观察组的51例产妇采用0.4μg/m L舒芬太尼以及0.08%罗哌卡因进行持续镇痛分娩;对照组的50例产妇则在宫口开全后,使用生理盐水替代泵内的局麻药物,直到分娩结束。比较两组产妇催产素的使用率,宫口扩张度和第一、第二产程按压硬膜外自控镇痛泵的次数,分娩方式,新生儿的体质量,脐动脉血pH值,出生后1 min和5 min Apgar评分,产妇修复会阴部时的视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale, VAS)评分及产妇对于第二产程镇痛的满意度评分。结果:两组产妇催产素的使用率、宫口扩张度和第一、第二产程按压硬膜外自控镇痛泵的次数、分娩方式(剖宫产率、器械助产率、自然分娩率)、第一产程镇痛时间、第一以及第二产程时间相比均无显著差异(P0.05);两组新生儿的体质量,脐动脉血pH值,出生后1 min和5 min Apgar评分小于8分的新生儿所占的比例相比没有明显的差异(P0.05);观察组产妇修复会阴部时的VAS评分明显低于对照组(P0.05),产妇对于第二产程镇痛的满意度评分明显高于对照组(P0.05)。结论:持续镇痛分娩对产妇分娩结局和新生儿评分无明显的影响,但可显著提高产妇对第二产程镇痛和修复会阴部时镇痛的满意度。     

Effectiveness of pain relief in labour: survey of 1000 mothers

The amount of pain that had been experienced by 1000 women during vaginal delivery of a live child was determined by interview within 48 hours of delivery. Patients had been offered a choice of analgesia, and 536 had received epidural analgesia: pain relief was greatest in this group, just over half having had a painless labour. The duration of pain was also reduced by a third in this group even though patients who had received an epidural block had tended to have longer labour and an incidence of assisted delivery of 51% compared with 6% in the remainder. Seventy-two per cent of the patients receiving an epidural had had as much pain as they had expected. A similar proportion (70%) was reported with simpler analgesic methods, suggesting that women may expect a certain amount of pain in labour and request further analgesic treatment when this is exceeded.     

患者静脉自控镇痛与患者硬膜外自控镇痛的比较

术后自控镇痛方法有：患者静脉自控镇痛（Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia, PCIA）、患者硬膜外自控镇痛 (Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia, PCEA）、患者区域自控镇痛（Patient-controlled Regional Analgesia, PCRA)、患者皮下自控镇痛 (Patient-controlled Subcutaneous Analgesia, PCSA)、患者自控鼻内镇痛（Patient-controlled intranasal analgesia, PCINA)、芬太尼HCI 电离子渗入疗法经皮系统（Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System, ITS)和连续椎旁阻滞（Continuous Paravertebral block, CPVB） 等。目前在临床工作中较常使用的主要是PCIA 和PCEA。有研究报道,与PCIA 比较,PCEA 镇痛效果更确切,恶心、呕吐及嗜睡发 生率低;但也有报道认为,与PCEA 相比,PCIA 实施相对方便,同时也可以提供令患者满意的镇痛效果,适用范围更广。目前对于 这两种镇痛方法的效果优劣尚无确切的定论,在此就PCIA 和PCEA的镇痛药物特点、镇痛效果、副反应及对免疫功能和肿瘤患 者远期生存率的影响作一综述。     

多模式镇痛在全膝关节置换术中的疗效评价

目的：探讨联合关节周围注射镇痛药物和持续静脉镇痛的多模式镇痛对全膝关节置换术（total knee arthroplasty,TKA）患者功能恢复的疗效。方法：60例拟行单侧TKA的患者完全随机分为实验组（28例）和对照组（28例）。所有患者术前48 h开始服用塞来昔布（西乐葆）200 mg/次,每天2次。实验组患者术中膝关节周围注射镇痛药物,术后给予持续静脉镇痛（continuous intravenousanalgesia,CIA）。对照组患者没有运用关节周围注射药物,仅给予术后CIA。记录术后CIA用量、各时间点静止视觉模拟疼痛评分（rest visual analogue score,RVAS）、被动活动视觉模拟疼痛评分（passive visual analogue score,PVAS）和膝关节活动度（range of mo-tion,ROM）,同时观察药物的毒副作用。结果：（1）实验组术后24、48 h内PCA的用量均显著低于对照组（P〈0.05）。（2）实验组术后4、8、12、24、48 h的RVAS和24、48 h的PVAS均显著低于对照组（P〈0.05）;术后72 h两组间RVAS和PVAS的差异均无统计学差异（P〉0.05）。（3）实验组术后第1、2、3 d的ROM均显著高于对照组（P〈0.05）,术后第l、2 w两组ROM之间的差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）;实验组术后主动屈膝到90？所需的天数显著低于对照组（P〈0.05）。（4）实验组中恶心、呕吐和追加药物的发生率均显著低于对照组（P〈0.05）,未发现伤口感染、延期愈合及组织坏死等并发症。结论：联合使用关节周围注射镇痛药物和持续静脉镇痛的多模式镇痛方案,可以有效的缓解TKA患者术后早期的疼痛,促进患者膝关节的功能恢复,减少了单一用药所产生的不良反应。该方案安全有效、操作简单,是一种值得推广的TKA术后镇痛方法。     

Peripheral regional analgesia with femoral catheter versus intravenous patient controlled analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of femoral analgesia (FA) with 0.25% levobupivacain and intravenous patient controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine on postoperative pain assessed by a visual-analog scale (VAS) score and their complications during the first 24 postoperative hours after the a total knee arthroplasty in a prospective randomized study. Secondary outcomes included: morphine use, patient satisfaction, complication of analgesia and duration of hospital stay. We analyzed 71 patients with an ASA score of II or III. The patients were randomized into two groups: group PCA (n = 36) was given the PCA pump, which contained morphine; and group FA (n = 35) was given first a bolus dose, then a continuous infusion 0.25% levobupivacain via a femoral catheter. The assessment of VAS was performed every 2 hours. There were no differences between the PCA and FA groups regarding demographic characteristics, operation duration, ASA score distribution, duration of hospital stay and satisfaction with analgesia (although there were more satisfied patients in the FA group). Significant differences were noted in the quantity of morphine used (higher values were in the PCA group; p < 0.001). More complications were recorded in PCA group (p < 0.001). The VAS score was lower in the FA group (p < 0.001). The highest difference occurred 4 hours after the operation, with the PCA group having significantly higher VAS score values compared to the FA group. Femoral analgesia leads to a stronger pain relief with less side effects, less morphine use and more patient satisfaction than intravenous PCA with morphine.     

骨科术后疼痛的原因分析及对策研究

目的:总结骨科术后疼痛的原因,并采取合适对策,以期降低骨科患者疼痛,提高满意度。方法:选取2012年1月-2015年1月1500例骨科手术患者为研究对象,总结引起疼痛的原因,并按照住院号单双号分成2组,对照组给予双氯芬酸钠栓镇痛,观察组采用镇痛泵镇痛,根据麻醉情况选择静脉镇痛或硬膜外镇痛,给予舒芬太尼或地佐辛镇痛,观察两组治疗前后相关指标的变化情况。结果:骨科术后疼痛原因以手术创伤为主,占92.93%,其次是手术体位限制,占53.07%,尿潴留占37.07%。两组治疗后SAS、SDS评分均较治疗前显著下降,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05),观察组治疗后SAS、SDS评分较对照组治疗后改善更加显著(P0.05)。观察组治疗后3 h、10 h、1 d、3 d、7 d VAS评分均较治疗前显著下降(P0.05),对照组治疗后3 d、7 d VAS评分较治疗前显著下降(P0.05),观察组治疗后3 h、10 h、1 d、3 d VAS评分较对照组改善更加显著(P0.05)。结论:骨科术后疼痛原因主要与手术创伤、手术体位限制有关,使用镇痛泵辅以及心理疏导能有效缓解骨科术后患者的对疼痛的感知,改善患者术后的生活质量。