纤维素酶分子结构和功能研究进展

概述了近10年来利用结构生物学和蛋白质工程技术在纤维素酶分子结构和功能方面研究的进展,包括：酶分子结构域的拆分、催化域和纤维素结合结构域的结构和功能的研究,纤维素酶的分子折叠.并展望了该领域的研究前景.     

Structure of histone acetyltransferases

Histone acetyltranferase (HAT) enzymes are the catalytic subunits of multisubunit protein complexes that acetylate specific lysine residues on the N-terminal regions of the histone components of chromatin to promote gene activation. These enzymes, which now include more than 20 members, fall into distinct families that generally have high sequence similarity and related substrate specificity within families, but have divergent sequence and substrate specificity between families. Significant insights into the mode of catalysis and histone substrate binding have been provided by the structure determination of the divergent HAT enzymes Hat1, Gcn5/PCAF and Esa1. A comparison of these structures reveals a structurally conserved central core domain that mediates extensive interactions with the acetyl-coenzyme A cofactor, and structurally divergent N and C-terminal domains. A correlation of these structures with other studies reveals that the core domain plays a particularly important role in histone substrate catalysis and that the N and C-terminal domains play important roles in histone substrate binding. These correlations imply a related mode of catalysis and histone substrate binding by a diverse group of HAT enzymes.     

Microbial starch-binding domain

Glucosidic bonds from different non-soluble polysaccharides such as starch, cellulose and xylan are hydrolyzed by amylases, cellulases and xylanases, respectively. These enzymes are produced by microorganisms. They have a modular structure that is composed of a catalytic domain and at least one non-catalytic domain that is involved in polysaccharide binding. Starch-binding modules are present in microbial enzymes that are involved in starch metabolism; these are classified into several different families on the basis of their amino acid sequence similarities. Such binding domains promote attachment to the substrate and increase its concentration at the active site of the enzyme, which allows microorganisms to degrade non-soluble starch. Fold similarities are better conserved than sequences; nevertheless, it is possible to notice two evolutionary clusters of microbial starch-binding domains. These domains have enormous potential as tags for protein immobilization, as well as for the tailoring of enzymes that play a part in polysaccharide metabolism.     

Architecture and Assembly of HIV Integrase Multimers in the Absence of DNA Substrates

We have applied small angle x-ray scattering and protein cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry to determine the architectures of full-length HIV integrase (IN) dimers in solution. By blocking interactions that stabilize either a core-core domain interface or N-terminal domain intermolecular contacts, we show that full-length HIV IN can form two dimer types. One is an expected dimer, characterized by interactions between two catalytic core domains. The other dimer is stabilized by interactions of the N-terminal domain of one monomer with the C-terminal domain and catalytic core domain of the second monomer as well as direct interactions between the two C-terminal domains. This organization is similar to the “reaching dimer” previously described for wild type ASV apoIN and resembles the inner, substrate binding dimer in the crystal structure of the PFV intasome. Results from our small angle x-ray scattering and modeling studies indicate that in the absence of its DNA substrate, the HIV IN tetramer assembles as two stacked reaching dimers that are stabilized by core-core interactions. These models of full-length HIV IN provide new insight into multimer assembly and suggest additional approaches for enzyme inhibition.     

Response regulators of bacterial signal transduction systems: Selective domain shuffling during evolution

Response regulators of bacterial sensory transduction systems generally consist of receiver module domains covalently linked to effector domains. The effector domains include DNA binding and/or catalytic units that are regulated by sensor kinase-catalyzed aspartyl phosphorylation within their receiver modules. Most receiver modules are associated with three distinct families of DNA binding domains, but some are associated with other types of DNA binding domains, with methylated chemotaxis protein (MCP) demethylases, or with sensor kinases. A few exist as independent entities which regulate their target systems by noncovalent interactions.In this study the molecular phylogenies of the receiver modules and effector domains of 49 fully sequenced response regulators and their homologues were determined. The three major, evolutionarily distinct, DNA binding domains found in response regulators were evaluated for their phylogenetic relatedness, and the phylogenetic trees obtained for these domains were compared with those for the receiver modules. Members of one family (family 1) of DNA binding domains are linked to large ATPase domains which usually function cooperatively in the activation of E. Coli ⁵⁴-dependent promoters or their equivalents in other bacteria. Members of a second family (family 2) always function in conjunction with the E. Coli ⁷⁰ or its equivalent in other bacteria. A third family of DNA binding domains (family 3) functions by an uncharacterized mechanism involving more than one a factor. These three domain families utilize distinct helix-turn-helix motifs for DNA binding.The phylogenetic tree of the receiver modules revealed three major and several minor clusters of these domains. The three major receiver module clusters (clusters 1, 2, and 3) generally function with the three major families of DNA binding domains (families 1, 2, and 3, respectively) to comprise three classes of response regulators (classes 1, 2, and 3), although several exceptions exist. The minor clusters of receiver modules were usually, but not always, associated with other types of effector domains. Finally, several receiver modules did not fit into a cluster. It was concluded that receiver modules usually diverged from common ancestral protein domains together with the corresponding effector domains, although domain shuffling, due to intragenic splicing and fusion, must have occurred during the evolution of some of these proteins.Multiple sequence alignments of the 49 receiver modules and their various types of effector domains, together with other homologous domains, allowed definition of regions of striking sequence similarity and degrees of conservation of specific residues. Sequence data were correlated with structure/function when such information was available. These studies should provide guides for extrapolation of results obtained with one response regulator to others as well as for the design of future structure/function analyses. Correspondence to: M.H. Saier, Jr.     

Architecture and function of metallopeptidase catalytic domains

The cleavage of peptide bonds by metallopeptidases (MPs) is essential for life. These ubiquitous enzymes participate in all major physiological processes, and so their deregulation leads to diseases ranging from cancer and metastasis, inflammation, and microbial infection to neurological insults and cardiovascular disorders. MPs cleave their substrates without a covalent intermediate in a single‐step reaction involving a solvent molecule, a general base/acid, and a mono‐ or dinuclear catalytic metal site. Most monometallic MPs comprise a short metal‐binding motif (HEXXH), which includes two metal‐binding histidines and a general base/acid glutamate, and they are grouped into the zincin tribe of MPs. The latter divides mainly into the gluzincin and metzincin clans. Metzincins consist of globular ～130–270‐residue catalytic domains, which are usually preceded by N‐terminal pro‐segments, typically required for folding and latency maintenance. The catalytic domains are often followed by C‐terminal domains for substrate recognition and other protein–protein interactions, anchoring to membranes, oligomerization, and compartmentalization. Metzincin catalytic domains consist of a structurally conserved N‐terminal subdomain spanning a five‐stranded β‐sheet, a backing helix, and an active‐site helix. The latter contains most of the metal‐binding motif, which is here characteristically extended to HEXXHXXGXX(H,D). Downstream C‐terminal subdomains are generally shorter, differ more among metzincins, and mainly share a conserved loop—the Met‐turn—and a C‐terminal helix. The accumulated structural data from more than 300 deposited structures of the 12 currently characterized metzincin families reviewed here provide detailed knowledge of the molecular features of their catalytic domains, help in our understanding of their working mechanisms, and form the basis for the design of novel drugs.     

Twenty-five years of nomenclature and classification of proteolytic enzymes

Proteolytic enzymes and their homologues have been classified into clans by comparing the tertiary structures of the peptidase domains, into families by comparing the protein sequences of the peptidase domains, and into protein-species by comparing various attributes including domain architecture, substrate preference, inhibitor interactions, subcellular location, and phylogeny. The results are compared with the earlier classification (Rawlings and Barrett, 1993 [1]). The numbers of sequences, protein-species, families, clans and even catalytic type have substantially increased during the intervening 26 years. The alternative classifications by catalytic type and/or activity are shown not to reflect evolutionary relationships.     

Differential scanning calorimetric,circular dichroism,and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic characterization of the thermal unfolding of xylanase A from Streptomyces lividans

The thermal unfolding of xylanase A from Streptomyces lividans, and of its isolated substrate binding and catalytic domains, was studied by differential scanning calorimetry and Fourier transform infrared and circular dichroism spectroscopy. Our calorimetric studies show that the thermal denaturation of the intact enzyme is a complex process consisting of two endothermic events centered near 57 and 64 degrees C and an exothermic event centered near 75 degrees C, all of which overlap slightly on the temperature scale. A comparison of the data obtained with the intact enzyme and isolated substrate binding and catalytic domains indicate that the lower- and higher-temperature endothermic events are attributable to the thermal unfolding of the xylan binding and catalytic domains, respectively, whereas the higher-temperature exothermic event arises from the aggregation and precipitation of the denatured catalytic domain. Moreover, the thermal unfolding of the two domains of the native enzyme are thermodynamically independent and differentially sensitive to pH. The unfolding of the substrate binding domain is a reversible two-state process and, under appropriate conditions, the refolding of this domain to its native conformation can occur. In contrast, the unfolding of the catalytic domain is a more complex process in which two subdomains unfold independently over a similar temperature range. Also, the unfolding of the catalytic domain leads to aggregation and precipitation, which effectively precludes the refolding of the protein to its native conformation. These observations are compatible with the results of our spectroscopic studies, which show that the catalytic and substrate binding domains of the enzyme are structurally dissimilar and that their native conformations are unaffected by their association in the intact enzyme. Thus, the calorimetric and spectroscopic data demonstrate that the S. lividans xylanase A consists of structurally dissimilar catalytic and substrate binding domains that, although covalently linked, undergo essentially independent thermal denaturation. These observations provide valuable new insights into the structure and thermal stability of this enzyme and should assist our efforts at engineering xylanases that are more thermally robust and otherwise better suited for industrial applications.     

The Genomic Code: A Pervasive Encoding/Molding of Chromatin Structures and a Solution of the “Non‐Coding DNA” Mystery

Recent investigations have revealed 1) that the isochores of the human genome group into two super‐families characterized by two different long‐range 3D structures, and 2) that these structures, essentially based on the distribution and topology of short sequences, mold primary chromatin domains (and define nucleosome binding). More specifically, GC‐poor, gene‐poor isochores are low‐heterogeneity sequences with oligo‐A spikes that mold the lamina‐associated domains (LADs), whereas GC‐rich, gene‐rich isochores are characterized by single or multiple GC peaks that mold the topologically associating domains (TADs). The formation of these “primary TADs” may be followed by extrusion under the action of cohesin and CTCF. Finally, the genomic code, which is responsible for the pervasive encoding and molding of primary chromatin domains (LADs and primary TADs, namely the “gene spaces”/“spatial compartments”) resolves the longstanding problems of “non‐coding DNA,” “junk DNA,” and “selfish DNA” leading to a new vision of the genome as shaped by DNA sequences.     

Carbohydrate-binding domains: multiplicity of biological roles

Insoluble polysaccharides can be degraded by a set of hydrolytic enzymes formed by catalytic modules appended to one or more non-catalytic carbohydrate-binding modules (CBM). The most recognized function of these auxiliary domains is to bind polysaccharides, bringing the biocatalyst into close and prolonged vicinity with its substrate, allowing carbohydrate hydrolysis. Examples of insoluble polysaccharides recognized by these enzymes include cellulose, chitin, β-glucans, starch, glycogen, inulin, pullulan, and xylan. Based on their amino acid similarity, CBMs are grouped into 55 families that show notable variation in substrate specificity; as a result, their biological functions are miscellaneous. Carbohydrate or polysaccharide recognition by CBMs is an important event for processes related to metabolism, pathogen defense, polysaccharide biosynthesis, virulence, plant development, etc. Understanding of the CBMs properties and mechanisms in ligand binding is of vital significance for the development of new carbohydrate-recognition technologies and provide the basis for fine manipulation of the carbohydrate–CBM interactions.     

The evolution and structural anatomy of the small molecule metabolic pathways in Escherichia coli

The 106 small molecule metabolic (SMM) pathways in Escherichia coli are formed by the protein products of 581 genes. We can define 722 domains, nearly all of which are homologous to proteins of known structure, that form all or part of 510 of these proteins. This information allows us to answer general questions on the structural anatomy of the SMM pathway proteins and to trace family relationships and recruitment events within and across pathways. Half the gene products contain a single domain and half are formed by combinations of between two and six domains. The 722 domains belong to one of 213 families that have between one and 51 members. Family members usually conserve their catalytic or cofactor binding properties; substrate recognition is rarely conserved. Of the 213 families, members of only a quarter occur in isolation, i.e. they form single-domain proteins. Most members of the other families combine with domains from just one or two other families and a few more versatile families can combine with several different partners.Excluding isoenzymes, more than twice as many homologues are distributed across pathways as within pathways. However, serial recruitment, with two consecutive enzymes both being recruited to another pathway, is rare and recruitment of three consecutive enzymes is not observed. Only eight of the 106 pathways have a high number of homologues. Homology between consecutive pairs of enzymes with conservation of the main substrate-binding site but change in catalytic mechanism (which would support a simple model of retrograde pathway evolution) occurs only six times in the whole set of enzymes. Most of the domains that form SMM pathways have homologues in non-SMM pathways. Taken together, these results imply a pervasive "mosaic" model for the formation of protein repertoires and pathways.     

纤维素酶纤维素吸附区的结构与功能

大多数纤维素酶含有催化区和可与纤维素结合且氨基酸序列较为保守的纤维素吸附区(cellulosebindingdomain,CBD)。纤维素吸附区促进酶与底物的结合,有利于催化区对不溶性底物的作用,但对可溶性底物的催化作用无影响。对CBD结构的研究和进一步的诱变研究揭示:纤维素吸附区是通过几个芳香族氨基酸结合到纤维素表面。有实验证明外切葡聚糖酶的CBD对结晶纤维素有疏解作用。CBD结构域已成功地应用于一系列重组融合蛋白的纯化和固定化。对纤维素吸附区结构与功能的深入了解对进一步了解酶的作用机制,促进纤维素酶类生物技术的发展是重要的 。     

Molecular structures and functional relationships in clostridial neurotoxins

The seven serotypes of Clostridium botulinum neurotoxins (A-G) are the deadliest poison known to humans. They share significant sequence homology and hence possess similar structure-function relationships. Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNT) act via a four-step mechanism, viz., binding and internalization to neuronal cells, translocation of the catalytic domain into the cytosol and finally cleavage of one of the three soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNARE) causing blockage of neurotransmitter release leading to flaccid paralysis. Crystal structures of three holotoxins, BoNT/A, B and E, are available to date. Although the individual domains are remarkably similar, their domain organization is different. These structures have helped in correlating the structural and functional domains. This has led to the determination of structures of individual domains and combinations of them. Crystal structures of catalytic domains of all serotypes and several binding domains are now available. The catalytic domains are zinc endopeptidases and share significant sequence and structural homology. The active site architecture and the catalytic mechanism are similar although the binding mode of individual substrates may be different, dictating substrate specificity and peptide cleavage selectivity. Crystal structures of catalytic domains with substrate peptides provide clues to specificity and selectivity unique to BoNTs. Crystal structures of the receptor domain in complex with ganglioside or the protein receptor have provided information about the binding of botulinum neurotoxin to the neuronal cell. An overview of the structure-function relationship correlating the 3D structures with biochemical and biophysical data and how they can be used for structure-based drug discovery is presented here.     

Swapping the domains of exoribonucleases RNase II and RNase R: conferring upon RNase II the ability to degrade ds RNA

RNase II and RNase R are the two E. coli exoribonucleases that belong to the RNase II super family of enzymes. They degrade RNA hydrolytically in the 3' to 5' direction in a processive and sequence independent manner. However, while RNase R is capable of degrading structured RNAs, the RNase II activity is impaired by dsRNAs. The final end-product of these two enzymes is also different, being 4 nt for RNase II and 2 nt for RNase R. RNase II and RNase R share structural properties, including 60% of amino acid sequence similarity and have a similar modular domain organization: two N-terminal cold shock domains (CSD1 and CSD2), one central RNB catalytic domain, and one C-terminal S1 domain. We have constructed hybrid proteins by swapping the domains between RNase II and RNase R to determine which are the responsible for the differences observed between RNase R and RNase II. The results obtained show that the S1 and RNB domains from RNase R in an RNase II context allow the degradation of double-stranded substrates and the appearance of the 2 nt long end-product. Moreover, the degradation of structured RNAs becomes tail-independent when the RNB domain from RNase R is no longer associated with the RNA binding domains (CSD and S1) of the genuine protein. Finally, we show that the RNase R C-terminal Lysine-rich region is involved in the degradation of double-stranded substrates in an RNase II context, probably by unwinding the substrate before it enters into the catalytic cavity.     

Beta-helical catalytic domains in glycoside hydrolase families 49, 55 and 87: domain architecture,modelling and assignment of catalytic residues

X-ray crystallography and bioinformatics studies reveal a tendency for the right-handed β-helix domain architecture to be associated with carbohydrate binding proteins. Here we demonstrate the presence of catalytic β-helix domains in glycoside hydrolase (GH) families 49, 55 and 87 and provide evidence for their sharing a common evolutionary ancestor with two structurally characterized GH families, numbers 28 and 82. This domain assignment helps assign catalytic residues to each family. Further analysis of domain architecture reveals the association of carbohydrate binding modules with catalytic GH β-helices, as well as an unexpected pair of β-helix domains in GH family 55.     

Genome-based identification of a carbohydrate binding module in Streptococcus pneumoniae hyaluronate lyase

Hyaluronate lyase enzymes degrade hyaluronan, the main polysaccharide component of the connective tissues of higher animals, thereby destroying the normal connective tissue structure and exposing the host tissue cells to various endo- and exogenous factors, including bacterial toxins. The 3D crystal structures of functionally active but truncated Streptococcus pneumoniae and S. agalactiae hyaluronate lyases, along with their substrate and product complexes, have been determined. The enzymes are multidomain proteins with helical barrel-like catalytic domains and two types of beta-sheet domains. Here, through genome-based bioinformatics studies we identify an additional beta-sheet domain present in the most N-terminal part of streptococcal hyaluronate lyases. Fold recognition and modeling studies show that the domain is structurally similar to carbohydrate binding modules and is therefore likely to be directly involved in hyaluronan binding. Likely carbohydrate binding residues were identified and electrostatic complementarity of the hyaluronate lyase domain with hyaluronan demonstrated. The newly identified presumed hyaluronan binding domain likely improves catalytic efficiency by colocalizing the enzyme and its substrate. Other possible functions are discussed. Two contacting aromatic residues are conserved in the hydrophobic core of the hyaluronate lyase domain and in many, perhaps all, families in the superfamily in which they may be placed. This observation may help the identification and classification of other carbohydrate binding modules.     

Crystal structure and anion binding in the prokaryotic hydrogenase maturation factor HypF acylphosphatase-like domain

[NiFe]-hydrogenases require a set of complementary and regulatory proteins for correct folding and maturation processes. One of the essential regulatory proteins, HypF (82kDa) contains a N-terminal acylphosphatase (ACT)-like domain, a sequence motif shared with enzymes catalyzing O-carbamoylation, and two zinc finger motifs similar to those found in the DnaJ chaperone. The HypF acylphosphatase domain is thought to support the conversion of carbamoylphosphate into CO and CN(-), promoting coordination of these ligands to the hydrogenase metal cluster. It has been shown recently that the HypF N-terminal domain can aggregate in vitro to yield fibrils matching those formed by proteins linked to amyloid diseases. The 1.27A resolution HypF acylphosphatase domain crystal structure (residues 1-91; R-factor 13.1%) shows a domain fold of betaalphabetabetaalphabeta topology, as observed in mammalian acylphosphatases specifically catalyzing the hydrolysis of the carboxyl-phosphate bonds in acylphosphates. The HypF N-terminal domain can be assigned to the ferredoxin structural superfamily, to which RNA-binding domains of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins and some metallochaperone proteins belong. Additionally, the HypF N-terminal domain displays an intriguing structural relationship to the recently discovered ACT domains. The structures of different HypF acylphosphatase domain complexes show a phosphate binding cradle comparable to the P-loop observed in unrelated phosphatase families. On the basis of the catalytic mechanism proposed for acylphosphatases, whereby residues Arg23 and Asn41 would support substrate orientation and the nucleophilic attack of a water molecule on the phosphate group, fine structural features of the HypF N-terminal domain putative active site region may account for the lack of acylphosphatase activity observed for the expressed domain. The crystallographic analyses here reported were undertaken to shed light on the molecular bases of inactivity, folding, misfolding and aggregation of the HypF N-terminal acylphosphatase domain.     

Nitric Oxide Activation of Guanylate Cyclase Pushes the α1 Signaling Helix and the β1 Heme-binding Domain Closer to the Substrate-binding Site

The complete structure of the assembled domains of nitric oxide-sensitive guanylate cyclase (NOsGC) remains to be determined. It is also unknown how binding of NO to heme in guanylate cyclase is communicated to the catalytic domain. In the current study the conformational change of guanylate cyclase on activation by NO was studied using FRET. Endogenous tryptophan residues were used as donors, the substrate analog 2′-Mant-3′-dGTP as acceptor. The enzyme contains five tryptophan residues distributed evenly over all four functional domains. This provides a unique opportunity to detect the movement of the functional domains relative to the substrate-binding catalytic region. FRET measurements indicate that NO brings tryptophan 22 in the αB helix of the β₁ heme NO binding domain and tryptophan 466 in the second short helix of the α₁ coiled-coil domain closer to the catalytic domain. We propose that the respective domains act as a pair of tongs forcing the catalytic domain into the nitric oxide-activated conformation.     

Substrate binding stabilizes S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase in a closed conformation

Comparison of crystal structures of S-adenosylhomocysteine (AdoHcy) hydrolase in the substrate-free, NAD(+) form [Hu, Y., Komoto, J., Huang, Y., Gomi, T., Ogawa, H., Takata, Y., Fujioka, M., and Takusagawa, F. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 8323-8333] and a substrate-bound, NADH form [Turner, M. A., Yuan, C.-S., Borchardt, R. T., Hershfield, M. S., Smith, G. D., and Howell, P. L. (1998) Nat. Struct. Biol. 5, 369-376] indicates large differences in the spatial arrangement of the catalytic and NAD(+) binding domains. The substrate-free, NAD(+) form exists in an "open" form with respect to catalytic and NAD(+) binding domains, whereas the substrate-bound, NADH form exists in a closed form with respect to those domains. To address whether domain closure is induced by substrate binding or its subsequent oxidation, we have measured the rotational dynamics of spectroscopic probes covalently bound to Cys(113) and Cys(421) within the catalytic and carboxyl-terminal domains. An independent domain motion is associated with the catalytic domain prior to substrate binding, suggesting the presence of a flexible hinge element between the catalytic and NAD(+) binding domains. Following binding of substrates (i.e., adenosine or neplanocin A) or a nonsubstrate (i.e., 3'-deoxyadenosine), the independent domain motion associated with the catalytic domain is essentially abolished. Likewise, there is a substantial decrease in the average hydrodynamic volume of the protein that is consistent with a reduction in the overall dimensions of the homotetrameric enzyme following substrate binding and oxidation observed in earlier crystallographic studies. Thus, the catalytic and NAD(+) binding domains are stabilized to form a closed active site through interactions with the substrate prior to substrate oxidation.     

Factors affecting xylanase functionality in the degradation of arabinoxylans

Endo-beta-1,4-xylanases are key enzymes in the degradation of arabinoxylans, the main non-starch polysaccharides from grain cell walls. Due to the heterogeneity of arabinoxylans, xylanases with different characteristics are required in industrial applications but the choice of the enzyme is still largely empirical. Although the classification into glycoside hydrolase families greatly helped to derive mechanistic information on the catalytic and substrate specificity of xylanases, other factors e.g. their sensitivity to endogenous inhibitors, the presence of carbohydrate-binding module(s) and their degree of selectivity towards soluble versus insoluble substrate may play a role in determining the functionality of these enzymes in the degradation of arabinoxylans.