Kindlin-1 and -2 Directly Bind the C-terminal Region of �� Integrin Cytoplasmic Tails and Exert Integrin-specific Activation Effects

Integrin activation, the rapid conversion of integrin adhesion receptors from low to high affinity, occurs in response to intracellular signals that act on the short cytoplasmic tails of integrin β subunits. Talin binding to integrin β tails provides one key activation signal, but additional factors are likely to cooperate with talin to regulate integrin activation. The integrin β tail-binding proteins kindlin-2 and kindlin-3 were recently identified as integrin co-activators. Here we report an analysis of kindlin-1 and kindlin-2 interactions with β1 and β3 integrin tails and describe the effect of kindlin expression on integrin activation. We demonstrate a direct interaction of kindlin-1 and -2 with recombinant integrin β tails in pulldown binding assays. Our mutational analysis shows that the second conserved NXXY motif (Tyr⁷⁹⁵), a preceding threonine-containing region (Thr⁷⁸⁸ and Thr⁷⁸⁹) of the integrin β1A tail, and a conserved tryptophan in the F3 subdomain of the kindlin FERM domain (kindlin-1 Trp⁶¹² and kindlin-2 Trp⁶¹⁵) are required for direct kindlin-integrin interactions. Similar interactions were observed for integrin β3 tails. Using fluorescence-activated cell sorting we further show that transient expression of kindlin-1 or -2 in Chinese hamster ovary cells inhibits the activation of endogenous α5β1 or stably expressed αIIbβ3 integrins. This inhibition is not dependent on direct kindlin-integrin interactions because mutant kindlins exhibiting impaired integrin binding activity effectively inhibit integrin activation. Consistent with previous reports, we find that when co-expressed with the talin head, kindlin-1 or -2 can activate αIIbβ3. This effect is dependent on an intact integrin-binding site in kindlin. Notably however, even when co-expressed with activating levels of talin head, neither kindlin-1 or -2 can cooperate with talin to activate β1 integrins; instead they strongly inhibit talin-mediated activation. We suggest that kindlins are adaptor proteins that regulate integrin activation, that kindlin expression levels determine their effects, and that kindlins may exert integrin-specific effects.Integrins are a family of αβ heterodimeric transmembrane receptors that mediate cell adhesion to extracellular matrix, cell surface, or soluble protein ligands and modulate a variety of intracellular signaling cascades. A key feature of integrins is their ability to dynamically regulate their affinity for extracellular ligands. In a tightly regulated process generally termed integrin activation, intracellular signals that impinge upon the β subunit cytoplasmic tail induce conformational rearrangements in the integrin extracellular domains, increasing the binding affinity for extracellular ligands (1-3). Ligand-bound integrins then recruit additional signaling, adaptor, and cytoskeletal proteins to the integrin cytoplasmic domains, providing mechanical connections to the actin cytoskeleton and a link to a variety of signal transduction pathways (2-8).Recent years have seen significant advances in our understanding of integrin activation. Notable among these is the identification of the actin- and integrin-binding protein talin as a key integrin activator (1, 9). The 50-kDa talin head contains the principal integrin-binding site, and expression of the talin head is sufficient to activate β1 and β3 integrins (10, 11). The talin head contains a FERM (four point one ezrin radixin moesin) domain. FERM domains consist of trefoil arrangement of three subdomains (F1, F2, and F3). The phosphotyrosine-binding domain-like F3 subdomain of the talin FERM directly binds a conserved NP(I/L)Y motif in integrin β tails, and this interaction is necessary for integrin activation in vitro and in vivo (10, 12-19). However, although abundant evidence supports the importance of talin binding to integrin β tails during integrin activation, differences in sensitivity of integrins to talin activation and submaximal activation by overexpressed talin suggested that other activating factors may cooperate with talin (10, 20). In an attempt to identify and characterize potential co-activators, we investigated the kindlin family of FERM domain-containing proteins.Kindlin family proteins (21) were first characterized in nematodes where the sole Caenorhabditis elegans kindlin, UNC-112, was identified in an embryonic screen for defective motility and shown to be essential for the assembly of proper cell-matrix adhesion structures, where it normally co-localized with β integrin (22-24). UNC-112 is conserved across many species, because the nematode, fly, and human homologs are ∼60% similar (∼41% identical) over their entire length (24). Humans express three known homologs of UNC-112: kindlin-1 (Kindlerin, URP1, and FERMT1), kindlin-2 (Mig2 and mig-2), and kindlin-3 (Mig2B and URP2) (25-27). Kindlin-1 and -2 are most closely related, sharing 60% identity and 74% similarity, whereas kindlin-3 shares 53% identity and 69% similarity to kindlin-1 and 49% identity and 67% similarity to kindlin-2 (28). The kindlin proteins all contain a predicted Pleckstrin homology domain and a FERM domain that is most closely related to the talin FERM domain, particularly within the integrin-binding F3 subdomain (29). Based on this sequence similarity we proposed that kindlin FERM domains may directly bind integrin β tails, and we previously showed that kindlin-1 could be pulled down from cell lysates using recombinant integrin β1 and β3 tails and that kindlin-1 co-localized with integrins in focal adhesions (29). A similar localization was reported for kindlin-2 (26, 30), and recent reports provided clear evidence implicating kindlin-2 and kindlin-3 in regulation of integrin activation (31-33). Here, we have used integrin pulldown assays to demonstrate direct binding of full-length kindlin-1 to the cytoplasmic tails of β1A and β3 integrins and to identify key binding residues within the integrin tails and the kindlin F3 subdomain. We confirm that these interactions are important for recruiting kindlin-1 to focal adhesions and show that, contrary to expectations, overexpressed kindlin-1 or -2 inhibit β1 and β3 integrin activation. Overexpressed kindlin-1 or -2 can, however, cooperate with expressed talin head to activate β3 but not β1 integrins. We therefore provide the first data suggesting that kindlin-1 and -2 effects on integrin activation may show β subunit specificity.     

RIAM Activates Integrins by Linking Talin to Ras GTPase Membrane-targeting Sequences

Rap1 small GTPases interact with Rap1-GTP-interacting adaptor molecule (RIAM), a member of the MRL (Mig-10/RIAM/Lamellipodin) protein family, to promote talin-dependent integrin activation. Here, we show that MRL proteins function as scaffolds that connect the membrane targeting sequences in Ras GTPases to talin, thereby recruiting talin to the plasma membrane and activating integrins. The MRL proteins bound directly to talin via short, N-terminal sequences predicted to form amphipathic helices. RIAM-induced integrin activation required both its capacity to bind to Rap1 and to talin. Moreover, we constructed a minimized 50-residue Rap-RIAM module containing the talin binding site of RIAM joined to the membrane-targeting sequence of Rap1A. This minimized Rap-RIAM module was sufficient to target talin to the plasma membrane and to mediate integrin activation, even in the absence of Rap1 activity. We identified a short talin binding sequence in Lamellipodin (Lpd), another MRL protein; talin binding Lpd sequence joined to a Rap1 membrane-targeting sequence is sufficient to recruit talin and activate integrins. These data establish the mechanism whereby MRL proteins interact with both talin and Ras GTPases to activate integrins.Increased affinity (“activation”) of cellular integrins is central to physiological events such as cell migration, assembly of the extracellular matrix, the immune response, and hemostasis (1). Each integrin comprises a type I transmembrane α and β subunit, each of which has a large extracellular domain, a single transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic domain (tail). Talin binds to most integrin β cytoplasmic domains and the binding of talin to the integrin β tail initiates integrin activation (2–4). A small, PTB-like domain of talin mediates activation via a two-site interaction with integrin β tails (5), and this PTB domain is functionally masked in the intact talin molecule (6). A central question in integrin biology is how the talin-integrin interaction is regulated to control integrin activation; recent work has implicated Ras GTPases as critical signaling modules in this process (7).Ras proteins are small monomeric GTPases that cycle between the GTP-bound active form and the GDP-bound inactive form. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) promote Ras activity by exchanging bound GDP for GTP, whereas GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs)³ enhance the hydrolysis of Ras-bound GTP to GDP (for review, see Ref. 8). The Ras subfamily members Rap1A and Rap1B stimulate integrin activation (9, 10). For example, expression of constitutively active Rap1 activates integrin αMβ2 in macrophage, and inhibition of Rap1 abrogated integrin activation induced by inflammatory agonists (11–13). Murine T-cells expressing constitutively active Rap1 manifest enhanced integrin dependent cell adhesion (14). In platelets, Rap1 is rapidly activated by platelet agonists (15, 16). A knock-out of Rap1B (17) or of the Rap1GEF, RasGRP2 (18), resulted in impairment of αIIbβ3-dependent platelet aggregation, highlighting the importance of Rap1 in platelet aggregation in vivo. Thus, Rap1 GTPases play important roles in the activation of several integrins in multiple biological contexts.Several Rap1 effectors have been implicated in integrin activation (19–21). Rap1-GTP-interacting adaptor molecule (RIAM) is a Rap1 effector that is a member of the MRL (Mig-10/RIAM/Lamellipodin) family of adaptor proteins (20). RIAM contains Ras association (RA) and pleckstrin homology (PH) domains and proline-rich regions, which are defining features of the MRL protein family. In Jurkat cells, RIAM overexpression induces β1 and β2 integrin-mediated cell adhesion, and RIAM knockdown abolishes Rap1-dependent cell adhesion (20), indicating RIAM is a downstream regulator of Rap1-dependent signaling. RIAM regulates actin dynamics as RIAM expression induces cell spreading; conversely, its depletion reduces cellular F-actin content (20). Whereas RIAM is greatly enriched in hematopoietic cells, Lamellipodin (Lpd) is a paralogue present in fibroblasts and other somatic cells (22).Recently we used forward, reverse, and synthetic genetics to engineer and order an integrin activation pathway in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing a prototype activable integrin, platelet αIIbβ3. We found that Rap1 induced formation of an “integrin activation complex” containing RIAM and talin (23). Here, we have established the mechanism whereby Ras GTPases cooperate with MRL family proteins, RIAM and Lpd, to regulate integrin activation. We find that MRL proteins function as scaffolds that connect the membrane targeting sequences in Ras GTPases to talin, thereby recruiting talin to integrins at the plasma membrane.     

The Cytoskeletal Protein ��-Actinin Regulates Acid-sensing Ion Channel 1a through a C-terminal Interaction

The acid-sensing ion channel 1a (ASIC1a) is widely expressed in central and peripheral neurons where it generates transient cation currents when extracellular pH falls. ASIC1a confers pH-dependent modulation on postsynaptic dendritic spines and has critical effects in neurological diseases associated with a reduced pH. However, knowledge of the proteins that interact with ASIC1a and influence its function is limited. Here, we show that α-actinin, which links membrane proteins to the actin cytoskeleton, associates with ASIC1a in brain and in cultured cells. The interaction depended on an α-actinin-binding site in the ASIC1a C terminus that was specific for ASIC1a versus other ASICs and for α-actinin-1 and -4. Co-expressing α-actinin-4 altered ASIC1a current density, pH sensitivity, desensitization rate, and recovery from desensitization. Moreover, reducing α-actinin expression altered acid-activated currents in hippocampal neurons. These findings suggest that α-actinins may link ASIC1a to a macromolecular complex in the postsynaptic membrane where it regulates ASIC1a activity.Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs)² are H⁺-gated members of the DEG/ENaC family (1–3). Members of this family contain cytosolic N and C termini, two transmembrane domains, and a large cysteine-rich extracellular domain. ASIC subunits combine as homo- or heterotrimers to form cation channels that are widely expressed in the central and peripheral nervous systems (1–4). In mammals, four genes encode ASICs, and two subunits, ASIC1 and ASIC2, have two splice forms, a and b. Central nervous system neurons express ASIC1a, ASIC2a, and ASIC2b (5–7). Homomeric ASIC1a channels are activated when extracellular pH drops below 7.2, and half-maximal activation occurs at pH 6.5–6.8 (8–10). These channels desensitize in the continued presence of a low extracellular pH, and they can conduct Ca²⁺ (9, 11–13). ASIC1a is required for acid-evoked currents in central nervous system neurons; disrupting the gene encoding ASIC1a eliminates H⁺-gated currents unless extracellular pH is reduced below pH 5.0 (5, 7).Previous studies found ASIC1a enriched in synaptosomal membrane fractions and present in dendritic spines, the site of excitatory synapses (5, 14, 15). Consistent with this localization, ASIC1a null mice manifested deficits in hippocampal long term potentiation, learning, and memory, which suggested that ASIC1a is required for normal synaptic plasticity (5, 16). ASICs might be activated during neurotransmission when synaptic vesicles empty their acidic contents into the synaptic cleft or when neuronal activity lowers extracellular pH (17–19). Ion channels, including those at the synapse often interact with multiple proteins in a macromolecular complex that incorporates regulators of their function (20, 21). For ASIC1a, only a few interacting proteins have been identified. Earlier work indicated that ASIC1a interacts with another postsynaptic scaffolding protein, PICK1 (15, 22, 23). ASIC1a also has been reported to interact with annexin II light chain p11 through its cytosolic N terminus to increase cell surface expression (24) and with Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II to phosphorylate the channel (25). However, whether ASIC1a interacts with additional proteins and with the cytoskeleton remain unknown. Moreover, it is not known whether such interactions alter ASIC1a function.In analyzing the ASIC1a amino acid sequence, we identified cytosolic residues that might bind α-actinins. α-Actinins cluster membrane proteins and signaling molecules into macromolecular complexes and link membrane proteins to the actincytoskeleton (for review, Ref. 26). Four genes encode α-actinin-1, -2, -3, and -4 isoforms. α-Actinins contain an N-terminal head domain that binds F-actin, a C-terminal region containing two EF-hand motifs, and a central rod domain containing four spectrin-like motifs (26–28). The C-terminal portion of the rod segment appears to be crucial for binding to membrane proteins. The α-actinins assemble into antiparallel homodimers through interactions in their rod domain. α-Actinins-1, -2, and -4 are enriched in dendritic spines, concentrating at the postsynaptic membrane (29–35). In the postsynaptic membrane of excitatory synapses, α-actinin connects the NMDA receptor to the actin cytoskeleton, and this interaction is key for Ca²⁺-dependent inhibition of NMDA receptors (36–38). α-Actinins can also regulate the membrane trafficking and function of several cation channels, including L-type Ca²⁺ channels, K⁺ channels, and TRP channels (39–41).To better understand the function of ASIC1a channels in macromolecular complexes, we asked if ASIC1a associates with α-actinins. We were interested in the α-actinins because they and ASIC1a, both, are present in dendritic spines, ASIC1a contains a potential α-actinin binding sequence, and the related epithelial Na⁺ channel (ENaC) interacts with the cytoskeleton (42, 43). Therefore, we hypothesized that α-actinin interacts structurally and functionally with ASIC1a.     

Sequential protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent and PKC-independent protein kinase D catalytic activation via Gq-coupled receptors: differential regulation of activation loop Ser(744) and Ser(748) phosphorylation

Protein kinase D (PKD) is a serine/threonine protein kinase rapidly activated by G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) agonists via a protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent pathway. Recently, PKD has been implicated in the regulation of long term cellular activities, but little is known about the mechanism(s) of sustained PKD activation. Here, we show that cell treatment with the preferential PKC inhibitors GF 109203X or Gö 6983 blocked rapid (1–5-min) PKD activation induced by bombesin stimulation, but this inhibition was greatly diminished at later times of bombesin stimulation (e.g. 45 min). These results imply that GPCR-induced PKD activation is mediated by early PKC-dependent and late PKC-independent mechanisms. Western blot analysis with site-specific antibodies that detect the phosphorylated state of the activation loop residues Ser⁷⁴⁴ and Ser⁷⁴⁸ revealed striking PKC-independent phosphorylation of Ser⁷⁴⁸ as well as Ser⁷⁴⁴ phosphorylation that remained predominantly but not completely PKC-dependent at later times of bombesin or vasopressin stimulation (20–90 min). To determine the mechanisms involved, we examined activation loop phosphorylation in a set of PKD mutants, including kinase-deficient, constitutively activated, and PKD forms in which the activation loop residues were substituted for alanine. Our results show that PKC-dependent phosphorylation of the activation loop Ser⁷⁴⁴ and Ser⁷⁴⁸ is the primary mechanism involved in early phase PKD activation, whereas PKD autophosphorylation on Ser⁷⁴⁸ is a major mechanism contributing to the late phase of PKD activation occurring in cells stimulated by GPCR agonists. The present studies identify a novel mechanism induced by GPCR activation that leads to late, PKC-independent PKD activation.A rapid increase in the synthesis of lipid-derived second messengers with subsequent activation of protein phosphorylation cascades has emerged as a fundamental signal transduction mechanism triggered by multiple extracellular stimuli, including hormones, neurotransmitters, chemokines, and growth factors (1). Many of these agonists bind to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs),⁴ activate heterotrimeric G proteins and stimulate isoforms of the phospholipase C family, including β, γ, δ, and ε (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). Activated phospholipase Cs catalyze the hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate to produce the second messengers inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and diacylglycerol (DAG). Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate mobilizes Ca²⁺ from intracellular stores (3, 4) whereas DAG directly activates the classic (α, β, and γ) and novel (δ, ε, η, and θ) isoforms of PKC (5–7). Although it is increasingly recognized that each PKC isozyme has specific functions in vivo (5–8), the mechanisms by which PKC-mediated signals are propagated to critical downstream targets remain incompletely defined.PKD, also known initially as PKCμ (9, 10), and two recently identified serine protein kinases termed PKD2 (11) and PKCν/PKD3 (12, 13), which are similar in overall structure and primary amino acid sequence to PKD (14), constitute a new protein kinase family within the Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase group (15) and separate from the previously identified PKCs (14). Salient features of PKD structure include an N-terminal regulatory region containing a tandem repeat of cysteine-rich zinc finger-like motifs (termed the cysteine-rich domain) that confers high affinity binding to phorbol esters and DAG (9, 16, 17), followed by a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain that negatively regulates catalytic activity (18, 19). The C-terminal region of the PKDs contains its catalytic domain, which is distantly related to Ca²⁺-regulated kinases.In unstimulated cells, PKD is in a state of low kinase catalytic activity maintained by the N-terminal domain, which represses the catalytic activity of the enzyme by autoinhibition. Consistent with this model, deletions or single amino acid substitutions in the PH domain result in constitutive kinase activity (18–20). Physiological activation of PKD within cells occurs via a phosphorylation-dependent mechanism first identified in our laboratory (21). In response to cellular stimuli, PKD is converted from a low activity form into a persistently active form that is retained during isolation from cells, as shown by in vitro kinase assays performed in the absence of lipid co-activators (21, 22). PKD activation has been demonstrated in response to engagement of specific GPCRs either by regulatory peptides (23–30) or lysophosphatidic acid (27, 31, 32); signaling through G_q, G₁₂, G_i, and Rho (27, 31–34); activation of receptor tyrosine kinases, such as the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (23, 35, 36); cross-linking of B-cell receptor and T-cell receptor in B and T lymphocytes, respectively (37–40); and oxidative stress (41–44).Throughout these studies, multiple lines of evidence indicated that PKC activity is necessary for rapid PKD activation within intact cells. For example, rapid PKD activation was selectively and potently blocked by cell treatment with preferential PKC inhibitors (e.g. GF 109203X or Gö 6983) that do not directly inhibit PKD catalytic activity (21, 22), implying that PKD activation in intact cells is mediated, directly or indirectly, through PKCs. In line with this conclusion, cotransfection of PKD with active mutant forms of “novel” PKCs (PKCs δ, ε, η, and θ) resulted in robust PKD activation in the absence of cell stimulation (21, 44–46). Many reports demonstrated the operation of a rapid PKC/PKD signaling cascade in response to multiple GPCR agonists in a broad range of cell types, including normal and cancer cells (reviewed in Ref. 14). Our previous studies identified Ser⁷⁴⁴ and Ser⁷⁴⁸ in the PKD activation loop (also referred as the activation segment or T-loop) as phosphorylation sites critical for PKC-mediated PKD activation (reviewed in Ref. 14). Collectively, these findings demonstrated the existence of rapidly activated PKC-PKD protein kinase cascade(s) and raised the possibility that some PKC-dependent biological responses involve PKD acting as a downstream effector.PKD has been reported recently to mediate several important cellular activities and processes, including signal transduction (30, 47–49), chromatin modification (50), Golgi organization and function (51, 52), c-Jun function (47, 53, 54), NFκB-mediated gene expression (43, 55, 56), and cell survival, migration, and differentiation and DNA synthesis and proliferation (reviewed in Ref. 14). Thus, mounting evidence indicates that PKD has a remarkable diversity of both its signal generation and distribution and its potential for complex regulatory interactions with multiple downstream pathways, leading to multiple responses, including long term cellular events. Despite increasing recognition of its importance, very little is known about the mechanism(s) of sustained PKD activation as opposed to the well documented rapid, PKC-dependent PKD activation.The results presented here demonstrate that prolonged GPCR-induced PKD activation is mediated by sequential PKC-dependent and PKC-independent phases of regulation. We report here, for the first time, that PKD autophosphorylation on Ser⁷⁴⁸ is a major mechanism contributing to the late phase of PKD activation occurring in cells stimulated by GPCR agonists. The present studies expand previous models of PKD regulation by identifying a novel mechanism induced by GPCR activation that leads to late, PKC-independent PKD activation.     

Engineered Protein Connectivity to Actin Mimics PDZ-dependent Recycling of G Protein-coupled Receptors but Not Its Regulation by Hrs

Many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) recycle after agonist-induced endocytosis by a sequence-dependent mechanism, which is distinct from default membrane flow and remains poorly understood. Efficient recycling of the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) requires a C-terminal PDZ (PSD-95/Discs Large/ZO-1) protein-binding determinant (PDZbd), an intact actin cytoskeleton, and is regulated by the endosomal protein Hrs (hepatocyte growth factor-regulated substrate). The PDZbd is thought to link receptors to actin through a series of protein interaction modules present in NHERF/EBP50 (Na⁺/H+ exchanger 3 regulatory factor/ezrin-binding phosphoprotein of 50 kDa) family and ERM (ezrin/radixin/moesin) family proteins. It is not known, however, if such actin connectivity is sufficient to recapitulate the natural features of sequence-dependent recycling. We addressed this question using a receptor fusion approach based on the sufficiency of the PDZbd to promote recycling when fused to a distinct GPCR, the δ-opioid receptor, which normally recycles inefficiently in HEK293 cells. Modular domains mediating actin connectivity promoted receptor recycling with similarly high efficiency as the PDZbd itself, and recycling promoted by all of the domains was actin-dependent. Regulation of receptor recycling by Hrs, however, was conferred only by the PDZbd and not by downstream interaction modules. These results suggest that actin connectivity is sufficient to mimic the core recycling activity of a GPCR-linked PDZbd but not its cellular regulation.G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)² comprise the largest family of transmembrane signaling receptors expressed in animals and transduce a wide variety of physiological and pharmacological information. While these receptors share a common 7-transmembrane-spanning topology, structural differences between individual GPCR family members confer diverse functional and regulatory properties (1-4). A fundamental mechanism of GPCR regulation involves agonist-induced endocytosis of receptors via clathrin-coated pits (4). Regulated endocytosis can have multiple functional consequences, which are determined in part by the specificity with which internalized receptors traffic via divergent downstream membrane pathways (5-7).Trafficking of internalized GPCRs to lysosomes, a major pathway traversed by the δ-opioid receptor (δOR), contributes to proteolytic down-regulation of receptor number and produces a prolonged attenuation of subsequent cellular responsiveness to agonist (8, 9). Trafficking of internalized GPCRs via a rapid recycling pathway, a major route traversed by the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR), restores the complement of functional receptors present on the cell surface and promotes rapid recovery of cellular signaling responsiveness (6, 10, 11). When co-expressed in the same cells, the δOR and β2AR are efficiently sorted between these divergent downstream membrane pathways, highlighting the occurrence of specific molecular sorting of GPCRs after endocytosis (12).Recycling of various integral membrane proteins can occur by default, essentially by bulk membrane flow in the absence of lysosomal sorting determinants (13). There is increasing evidence that various GPCRs, such as the β2AR, require distinct cytoplasmic determinants to recycle efficiently (14). In addition to requiring a cytoplasmic sorting determinant, sequence-dependent recycling of the β2AR differs from default recycling in its dependence on an intact actin cytoskeleton and its regulation by the conserved endosomal sorting protein Hrs (hepatocyte growth factor receptor substrate) (11, 14). Compared with the present knowledge regarding protein complexes that mediate sorting of GPCRs to lysosomes (15, 16), however, relatively little is known about the biochemical basis of sequence-directed recycling or its regulation.The β2AR-derived recycling sequence conforms to a canonical PDZ (PSD-95/Discs Large/ZO-1) protein-binding determinant (henceforth called PDZbd), and PDZ-mediated protein association(s) with this sequence appear to be primarily responsible for its endocytic sorting activity (17-20). Fusion of this sequence to the cytoplasmic tail of the δOR effectively re-routes endocytic trafficking of engineered receptors from lysosomal to recycling pathways, establishing the sufficiency of the PDZbd to function as a transplantable sorting determinant (18). The β2AR-derived PDZbd binds with relatively high specificity to the NHERF/EBP50 family of PDZ proteins (21, 22). A well-established biochemical function of NHERF/EBP50 family proteins is to associate integral membrane proteins with actin-associated cytoskeletal elements. This is achieved through a series of protein-interaction modules linking NHERF/EBP50 family proteins to ERM (ezrin-radixin-moesin) family proteins and, in turn, to actin filaments (23-26). Such indirect actin connectivity is known to mediate other effects on plasma membrane organization and function (23), however, and NHERF/EBP50 family proteins can bind to additional proteins potentially important for endocytic trafficking of receptors (23, 25). Thus it remains unclear if actin connectivity is itself sufficient to promote sequence-directed recycling of GPCRs and, if so, if such connectivity recapitulates the normal cellular regulation of sequence-dependent recycling. In the present study, we took advantage of the modular nature of protein connectivity proposed to mediate β2AR recycling (24, 26), and extended the opioid receptor fusion strategy used successfully for identifying diverse recycling sequences in GPCRs (27-29), to address these fundamental questions.Here we show that the recycling activity of the β2AR-derived PDZbd can be effectively bypassed by linking receptors to ERM family proteins in the absence of the PDZbd itself. Further, we establish that the protein connectivity network can be further simplified by fusing receptors to an interaction module that binds directly to actin filaments. We found that bypassing the PDZ-mediated interaction using either domain is sufficient to mimic the ability of the PDZbd to promote efficient, actin-dependent recycling of receptors. Hrs-dependent regulation, however, which is characteristic of sequence-dependent recycling of wild-type receptors, was recapitulated only by the fused PDZbd and not by the proposed downstream interaction modules. These results support a relatively simple architecture of protein connectivity that is sufficient to mimic the core recycling activity of the β2AR-derived PDZbd, but not its characteristic cellular regulation. Given that an increasing number of GPCRs have been shown to bind PDZ proteins that typically link directly or indirectly to cytoskeletal elements (17, 27, 30-32), the present results also suggest that actin connectivity may represent a common biochemical principle underlying sequence-dependent recycling of various GPCRs.     

The Structure of an Interdomain Complex That Regulates Talin Activity

Talin is a large flexible rod-shaped protein that activates the integrin family of cell adhesion molecules and couples them to cytoskeletal actin. It exists in both globular and extended conformations, and an intramolecular interaction between the N-terminal F3 FERM subdomain and the C-terminal part of the talin rod contributes to an autoinhibited form of the molecule. Here, we report the solution structure of the primary F3 binding domain within the C-terminal region of the talin rod and use intermolecular nuclear Overhauser effects to determine the structure of the complex. The rod domain (residues 1655–1822) is an amphipathic five-helix bundle; Tyr-377 of F3 docks into a hydrophobic pocket at one end of the bundle, whereas a basic loop in F3 (residues 316–326) interacts with a cluster of acidic residues in the middle of helix 4. Mutation of Glu-1770 abolishes binding. The rod domain competes with β3-integrin tails for binding to F3, and the structure of the complex suggests that the rod is also likely to sterically inhibit binding of the FERM domain to the membrane.The cytoskeletal protein talin has emerged as a key player, both in regulating the affinity of the integrin family of cell adhesion molecules for ligand (1) and in coupling integrins to the actin cytoskeleton (2). Thus, depletion of talin results in defects in integrin activation (3), integrin signaling through focal adhesion kinase, the maintenance of cell spreading, and the assembly of focal adhesions in cultured cells (4). In the whole organism, studies on the single talin gene in worms (5) and flies (6) show that talin is essential for a variety of integrin-mediated events that are crucial for normal embryonic development. In vertebrates, there are two talin genes, and mice carrying a talin1 null allele fail to complete gastrulation (7). Tissue-specific inactivation of talin1 results in an inability to activate integrins in platelets (8, 9), defects in the membrane-cytoskeletal interface in megakaryocytes (10), and disruption of the myotendinous junction in skeletal muscle (11). In contrast, mice homozygous for a talin2 gene trap allele have no phenotype, although the allele may be hypomorphic (12).Recent structural studies have provided substantial insights into the molecular basis of talin action. Talin is composed of an N-terminal globular head (∼50 kDa) linked to an extended flexible rod (∼220 kDa). The talin head contains a FERM² domain (made up of F1, F2, and F3 subdomains) preceded by a domain referred to here as F0 (2). Studies by Wegener et al. (30) have shown how the F3 FERM subdomain, which has a phosphotyrosine binding domain fold, interacts with both the canonical NPXY motif and the membrane-proximal helical region of the cytoplasmic tails of integrin β-subunits (13). The latter interaction apparently activates the integrin by disrupting the salt bridge between the integrin α- and β-subunit tails that normally keeps integrins locked in a low affinity state. The observation that the F0 region is also important in integrin activation (14) may be explained by our recent finding that F0 binds, albeit with low affinity, Rap1-GTP,³ a known activator of integrins (15, 16). The talin rod is made up of a series of amphipathic α-helical bundles (17–20) and contains a second integrin binding site (IBS2) (21), numerous binding sites for the cytoskeletal protein vinculin (22), at least two actin binding sites (23), and a C-terminal helix that is required for assembly of talin dimers (20, 24).Both biochemical (25) and cellular studies (16) suggest that the integrin binding sites in full-length talin are masked, and both phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) and Rap1 have been implicated in exposing these sites. It is well established that some members of the FERM domain family of proteins are regulated by a head-tail interaction (26); gel filtration, sedimentation velocity, and electron microscopy studies all show that talin is globular in low salt buffers, although it is more elongated (∼60 nm in length) in high salt (27). By contrast, the talin rod liberated from full-length talin by calpain-II cleavage is elongated in both buffers, indicating that the head is required for talin to adopt a more compact state. Direct evidence for an interaction between the talin head and rod has recently emerged from NMR studies by Goksoy et al. (28), who demonstrated binding of ¹⁵N-labeled talin F3 to a talin rod fragment spanning residues 1654–2344, an interaction that was confirmed by surface plasmon resonance (K_d = 0.57 μm) (28). Chemical shift data also showed that this segment of the talin rod partially masked the binding site in F3 for the membraneproximal helix of the β3-integrin tail (28), directly implicating the talin head-rod interaction in regulating the integrin binding activity of talin. Goksoy et al. (28) subdivided the F3 binding site in this rod fragment into two sites with higher affinity (K_d ∼3.6 μm; residues 1654–1848) and lower affinity (K_d ∼78 μm; residues 1984–2344). Here, we define the rod domain boundaries and determine the NMR structure of residues 1655–1822, a five-helix bundle. We further show that this domain binds F3 predominantly via surface-exposed residues on helix 4, with an affinity similar to the high affinity site reported by Goksoy et al. (28). We also report the structure of the complex between F3 and the rod domain and show that the latter masks the known binding site in F3 for the β3-integrin tail and is expected to inhibit the association of the talin FERM domain with the membrane.     

Intracellular Trafficking of Presenilin 1 Is Regulated by ��-Amyloid Precursor Protein and Phospholipase D1

Excessive accumulation of β-amyloid peptides in the brain is a major cause for the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease. β-Amyloid is derived from β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) through sequential cleavages by β- and γ-secretases, whose enzymatic activities are tightly controlled by subcellular localization. Delineation of how intracellular trafficking of these secretases and APP is regulated is important for understanding Alzheimer disease pathogenesis. Although APP trafficking is regulated by multiple factors including presenilin 1 (PS1), a major component of the γ-secretase complex, and phospholipase D1 (PLD1), a phospholipid-modifying enzyme, regulation of intracellular trafficking of PS1/γ-secretase and β-secretase is less clear. Here we demonstrate that APP can reciprocally regulate PS1 trafficking; APP deficiency results in faster transport of PS1 from the trans-Golgi network to the cell surface and increased steady state levels of PS1 at the cell surface, which can be reversed by restoring APP levels. Restoration of APP in APP-deficient cells also reduces steady state levels of other γ-secretase components (nicastrin, APH-1, and PEN-2) and the cleavage of Notch by PS1/γ-secretase that is more highly correlated with cell surface levels of PS1 than with APP overexpression levels, supporting the notion that Notch is mainly cleaved at the cell surface. In contrast, intracellular trafficking of β-secretase (BACE1) is not regulated by APP. Moreover, we find that PLD1 also regulates PS1 trafficking and that PLD1 overexpression promotes cell surface accumulation of PS1 in an APP-independent manner. Our results clearly elucidate a physiological function of APP in regulating protein trafficking and suggest that intracellular trafficking of PS1/γ-secretase is regulated by multiple factors, including APP and PLD1.An important pathological hallmark of Alzheimer disease (AD)⁴ is the formation of senile plaques in the brains of patients. The major components of those plaques are β-amyloid peptides (Aβ), whose accumulation triggers a cascade of neurodegenerative steps ending in formation of senile plaques and intraneuronal fibrillary tangles with subsequent neuronal loss in susceptible brain regions (1, 2). Aβ is proteolytically derived from the β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) through sequential cleavages by β-secretase (BACE1), a novel membrane-bound aspartyl protease (3, 4), and by γ-secretase, a high molecular weight complex consisting of at least four components: presenilin (PS), nicastrin (NCT), anterior pharynx-defective-1 (APH-1), and presenilin enhancer-2 (PEN-2) (5, 6). APP is a type I transmembrane protein belonging to a protein family that includes APP-like protein 1 (APLP1) and 2 (APLP2) in mammals (7, 8). Full-length APP is synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and transported through the Golgi apparatus. Most secreted Aβ peptides are generated within the trans-Golgi network (TGN), also the major site of steady state APP in neurons (9–11). APP can be transported to the cell surface in TGN-derived secretory vesicles if not proteolyzed to Aβ or an intermediate metabolite. At the cell surface APP is either cleaved by α-secretase to produce soluble sAPPα (12) or reinternalized for endosomal/lysosomal degradation (13, 14). Aβ may also be generated in endosomal/lysosomal compartments (15, 16). In contrast to neurotoxic Aβ peptides, sAPPα possesses neuroprotective potential (17, 18). Thus, the subcellular distribution of APP and proteases that process it directly affect the ratio of sAPPα to Aβ, making delineation of the mechanisms responsible for regulating trafficking of all of these proteins relevant to AD pathogenesis.Presenilin (PS) is a critical component of the γ-secretase. Of the two mammalian PS gene homologues, PS1 and PS2, PS1 encodes the major form (PS1) in active γ-secretase (19, 20). Nascent PSs undergo endoproteolytic cleavage to generate an amino-terminal fragment (NTF) and a carboxyl-terminal fragment (CTF) to form a functional PS heterodimer (21). Based on observations that PSs possess two highly conserved aspartate residues indispensable for γ-secretase activity and that specific transition state analogue γ-secretase inhibitors bind to PS1 NTF/CTF heterodimers (5, 22), PSs are believed to be the catalytic component of the γ-secretase complex. PS assembles with three other components, NCT, APH-1, and PEN-2, to form the functional γ-secretase (5, 6). Strong evidence suggests that PS1/γ-secretase resides principally in the ER, early Golgi, TGN, endocytic and intermediate compartments, most of which (except the TGN) are not major subcellular sites for APP (23, 24). In addition to generating Aβ and cleaving APP to release the APP intracellular domain, PS1/γ-secretase cleaves other substrates such as Notch (25), cadherin (26), ErbB4 (27), and CD44 (28), releasing their respective intracellular domains. Interestingly, PS1/γ-secretase cleavage of different substrates seems to occur at different subcellular compartments; APP is mainly cleaved at the TGN and early endosome domains, whereas Notch is predominantly cleaved at the cell surface (9, 11, 29). Thus, perturbing intracellular trafficking of PS1/γ-secretase may alter interactions between PS1/γ-secretase and APP, contributing to either abnormal Aβ generation and AD pathogenesis or decreased access of PS1/γ-secretase to APP such that Aβ production is reduced. However, mechanisms regulating PS1/γ-secretase trafficking warrant further investigation.In addition to participating in γ-secretase activity, PS1 regulates intracellular trafficking of several membrane proteins, including other γ-secretase components (nicastrin, APH-1, and PEN-2) and the substrate APP (reviewed in Ref. 30). Intracellular APP trafficking is highly regulated and requires other factors such as mint family members and SorLA (2). Moreover, we recently found that phospholipase D1 (PLD1), a phospholipid-modifying enzyme that regulates membrane trafficking events, can interact with PS1, and can regulate budding of APP-containing vesicles from the TGN and delivery of APP to the cell surface (31, 32). Interestingly, Kamal et al. (33) identified an axonal membrane compartment that contains APP, BACE1, and PS1 and showed that fast anterograde axonal transport of this compartment is mediated by APP and kinesin-I, implying a traffic-regulating role for APP. Increased APP expression is also shown to decrease retrograde axonal transport of nerve growth factor (34). However, whether APP indeed regulates intracellular trafficking of proteins including BACE1 and PS1/γ-secretase requires further validation. In the present study we demonstrate that intracellular trafficking of PS1, as well as that of other γ-secretase components, but not BACE1, is regulated by APP. APP deficiency promotes cell surface delivery of PS1/γ-secretase complex and facilitates PS1/γ-secretase-mediated Notch cleavage. In addition, we find that PLD1 also regulates intracellular trafficking of PS1 through a different mechanism and more potently than APP.     

Insulin Resistance in Striated Muscle-specific Integrin Receptor ��1-deficient Mice

Integrin receptor plays key roles in mediating both inside-out and outside-in signaling between cells and the extracellular matrix. We have observed that the tissue-specific loss of the integrin β1 subunit in striated muscle results in a near complete loss of integrin β1 subunit protein expression concomitant with a loss of talin and to a lesser extent, a reduction in F-actin content. Muscle-specific integrin β1-deficient mice had no significant difference in food intake, weight gain, fasting glucose, and insulin levels with their littermate controls. However, dynamic analysis of glucose homeostasis using euglycemichyperinsulinemic clamps demonstrated a 44 and 48% reduction of insulin-stimulated glucose infusion rate and glucose clearance, respectively. The whole body insulin resistance resulted from a specific inhibition of skeletal muscle glucose uptake and glycogen synthesis without any significant effect on the insulin suppression of hepatic glucose output or insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in adipose tissue. The reduction in skeletal muscle insulin responsiveness occurred without any change in GLUT4 protein expression levels but was associated with an impairment of the insulin-stimulated protein kinase B/Akt serine 473 phosphorylation but not threonine 308. The inhibition of insulin-stimulated serine 473 phosphorylation occurred concomitantly with a decrease in integrin-linked kinase expression but with no change in the mTOR·Rictor·LST8 complex (mTORC2). These data demonstrate an in vivo crucial role of integrin β1 signaling events in mediating cross-talk to that of insulin action.Integrin receptors are a large family of integral membrane proteins composed of a single α and β subunit assembled into a heterodimeric complex. There are 19 α and 8 β mammalian subunit isoforms that combine to form 25 distinct α,β heterodimeric receptors (1-5). These receptors play multiple critical roles in conveying extracellular signals to intracellular responses (outside-in signaling) as well as altering extracellular matrix interactions based upon intracellular changes (inside-out signaling). Despite the large overall number of integrin receptor complexes, skeletal muscle integrin receptors are limited to seven α subunit subtypes (α1, α3, α4, α5, α6, α7, and αν subunits), all associated with the β1 integrin subunit (6, 7).Several studies have suggested an important cross-talk between extracellular matrix and insulin signaling. For example, engagement of β1 subunit containing integrin receptors was observed to increase insulin-stimulated insulin receptor substrate (IRS)² phosphorylation, IRS-associated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and activation of protein kinase B/Akt (8-11). Integrin receptor regulation of focal adhesion kinase was reported to modulate insulin stimulation of glycogen synthesis, glucose transport, and cytoskeleton organization in cultured hepatocytes and myoblasts (12, 13). Similarly, the integrin-linked kinase (ILK) was suggested to function as one of several potential upstream kinases that phosphorylate and activate Akt (14-18). In this regard small interfering RNA gene silencing of ILK in fibroblasts and conditional ILK gene knockouts in macrophages resulted in a near complete inhibition of insulin-stimulated Akt serine 473 (Ser-473) phosphorylation concomitant with an inhibition of Akt activity and phosphorylation of Akt downstream targets (19). However, a complex composed of mTOR·Rictor·LST8 (termed mTORC2) has been identified in several other studies as the Akt Ser-473 kinase (20, 21). In addition to Ser-473, Akt protein kinase activation also requires phosphorylation on threonine 308 Thr-30 by phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase, PDK1 (22-24).In vivo, skeletal muscle is the primary tissue responsible for postprandial (insulin-stimulated) glucose disposal that results from the activation of signaling pathways leading to the translocation of the insulin-responsive glucose transporter, GLUT4, from intracellular sites to the cell surface membranes (25, 26). Dysregulation of any step of this process in skeletal muscle results in a state of insulin resistance, thereby predisposing an individual for the development of diabetes (27-33). Although studies described above have utilized a variety of tissue culture cell systems to address the potential involvement of integrin receptor signaling in insulin action, to date there has not been any investigation of integrin function on insulin action or glucose homeostasis in vivo. To address this issue, we have taken advantage of Cre-LoxP technology to inactivate the β1 integrin receptor subunit gene in striated muscle. We have observed that muscle creatine kinase-specific integrin β1 knock-out (MCKItgβ1 KO) mice display a reduction of insulin-stimulated glucose infusion rate and glucose clearance. The impairment of insulin-stimulated skeletal muscle glucose uptake and glycogen synthesis resulted from a decrease in Akt Ser-473 phosphorylation concomitant with a marked reduction in ILK expression. Together, these data demonstrate an important cross-talk between integrin receptor function and insulin action and suggests that ILK may function as an Akt Ser-473 kinase in skeletal muscle.     

Mechanism of Activation and Functional Role of Protein Kinase C�� in Human Platelets

The novel class of protein kinase C (nPKC) isoform η is expressed in platelets, but not much is known about its activation and function. In this study, we investigated the mechanism of activation and functional implications of nPKCη using pharmacological and gene knock-out approaches. nPKCη was phosphorylated (at Thr-512) in a time- and concentration-dependent manner by 2MeSADP. Pretreatment of platelets with MRS-2179, a P2Y₁ receptor antagonist, or YM-254890, a G_q blocker, abolished 2MeSADP-induced phosphorylation of nPKCη. Similarly, ADP failed to activate nPKCη in platelets isolated from P2Y₁ and G_q knock-out mice. However, pretreatment of platelets with P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist, AR-C69331MX did not interfere with ADP-induced nPKCη phosphorylation. In addition, when platelets were activated with 2MeSADP under stirring conditions, although nPKCη was phosphorylated within 30 s by ADP receptors, it was also dephosphorylated by activated integrin α_IIbβ₃ mediated outside-in signaling. Moreover, in the presence of SC-57101, a α_IIbβ₃ receptor antagonist, nPKCη dephosphorylation was inhibited. Furthermore, in murine platelets lacking PP1cγ, a catalytic subunit of serine/threonine phosphatase, α_IIbβ₃ failed to dephosphorylate nPKCη. Thus, we conclude that ADP activates nPKCη via P2Y₁ receptor and is subsequently dephosphorylated by PP1γ phosphatase activated by α_IIbβ₃ integrin. In addition, pretreatment of platelets with η-RACK antagonistic peptides, a specific inhibitor of nPKCη, inhibited ADP-induced thromboxane generation. However, these peptides had no affect on ADP-induced aggregation when thromboxane generation was blocked. In summary, nPKCη positively regulates agonist-induced thromboxane generation with no effects on platelet aggregation.Platelets are the key cellular components in maintaining hemostasis (1). Vascular injury exposes subendothelial collagen that activates platelets to change shape, secrete contents of granules, generate thromboxane, and finally aggregate via activated α_IIbβ₃ integrin, to prevent further bleeding (2, 3). ADP is a physiological agonist of platelets secreted from dense granules and is involved in feedback activation of platelets and hemostatic plug stabilization (4). It activates two distinct G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) on platelets, P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₂, which couple to G_q and G_i, respectively (5–8). G_q activates phospholipase Cβ (PLCβ), which leads to diacyl glycerol (DAG)² generation and calcium mobilization (9, 10). On the other hand, G_i is involved in inhibition of cAMP levels and PI 3-kinase activation (4, 6). Synergistic activation of G_q and G_i proteins leads to the activation of the fibrinogen receptor integrin α_IIbβ₃. Fibrinogen bound to activated integrin α_IIbβ₃ further initiates feed back signaling (outside-in signaling) in platelets that contributes to the formation of a stable platelet plug (11).Protein kinase Cs (PKCs) are serine/threonine kinases known to regulate various platelet functional responses such as dense granule secretion and integrin α_IIbβ₃ activation (12, 13). Based on their structure and cofactor requirements, PKCs are divided in to three classes: classical (cofactors: DAG, Ca²⁺), novel (cofactors: DAG) and atypical (cofactors: PIP₃) PKC isoforms (14). All the members of the novel class of PKC isoforms (nPKC), viz. nPKC isoforms δ, θ, η, and ε, are expressed in platelets (15), and they require DAG for activation. Among all the nPKCs, PKCδ (15, 16) and PKCθ (17–19) are fairly studied in platelets. Whereas nPKCδ is reported to regulate protease-activated receptor (PAR)-mediated dense granule secretion (15, 20), nPKCθ is activated by outside-in signaling and contributes to platelet spreading on fibrinogen (18). On the other hand, the mechanism of activation and functional role of nPKCη is not addressed as yet.PKCs are cytoplasmic enzymes. The enzyme activity of PKCs is modulated via three mechanisms (14, 21): 1) cofactor binding: upon cell stimulus, cytoplasmic PKCs mobilize to membrane, bind cofactors such as DAG, Ca²⁺, or PIP3, release autoinhibition, and attain an active conformation exposing catalytic domain of the enzyme. 2) phosphorylations: 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1) on the membrane phosphorylates conserved threonine residues on activation loop of catalytic domain; this is followed by autophosphorylations of serine/threonine residues on turn motif and hydrophobic region. These series of phosphorylations maintain an active conformation of the enzyme. 3) RACK binding: PKCs in active conformation bind receptors for activated C kinases (RACKs) and are lead to various subcellular locations to access the substrates (22, 23). Although various leading laboratories have elucidated the activation of PKCs, the mechanism of down-regulation of PKCs is not completely understood.The premise of dynamic cell signaling, which involves protein phosphorylations by kinases and dephosphorylations by phosphatases has gained immense attention over recent years. PP1, PP2A, PP2B, PHLPP are a few of the serine/threonine phosphatases reported to date. Among them PP1 and PP2 phosphatases are known to regulate various platelet functional responses (24, 25). Furthermore, PP1c, is the catalytic unit of PP1 known to constitutively associate with α_IIb and is activated upon integrin engagement with fibrinogen and subsequent outside-in signaling (26). Among various PP1 isoforms, recently PP1γ is shown to positively regulate platelet functional responses (27). Thus, in this study we investigated if the above-mentioned phosphatases are involved in down-regulation of nPKCη. Furthermore, reports from other cell systems suggest that nPKCη regulates ERK/JNK pathways (28). In platelets ERK is known to regulate agonist induced thromboxane generation (29, 30). Thus, we also investigated if nPKCη regulates ERK phosphorylation and thereby agonist-induced platelet functional responses.In this study, we evaluated the activation of nPKCη downstream of ADP receptors and its inactivation by an integrin-associated phosphatase PP1γ. We also studied if nPKCη regulates functional responses in platelets and found that this isoform regulates ADP-induced thromboxane generation, but not fibrinogen receptor activation in platelets.     

Polo-like Kinase 2 (PLK2) Phosphorylates ��-Synuclein at Serine 129 in Central Nervous System

Several neurological diseases, including Parkinson disease and dementia with Lewy bodies, are characterized by the accumulation of α-synuclein phosphorylated at Ser-129 (p-Ser-129). The kinase or kinases responsible for this phosphorylation have been the subject of intense investigation. Here we submit evidence that polo-like kinase 2 (PLK2, also known as serum-inducible kinase or SNK) is a principle contributor to α-synuclein phosphorylation at Ser-129 in neurons. PLK2 directly phosphorylates α-synuclein at Ser-129 in an in vitro biochemical assay. Inhibitors of PLK kinases inhibited α-synuclein phosphorylation both in primary cortical cell cultures and in mouse brain in vivo. Finally, specific knockdown of PLK2 expression by transduction with short hairpin RNA constructs or by knock-out of the plk2 gene reduced p-Ser-129 levels. These results indicate that PLK2 plays a critical role in α-synuclein phosphorylation in central nervous system.The importance of α-synuclein to the pathogenesis of Parkinson disease (PD)⁴ and the related disorder, dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), is suggested by its association with Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites, the inclusions that characterize these diseases (1–3), and demonstrated by the existence of mutations that cause syndromes mimicking sporadic PD and DLB (4–6). Furthermore, three separate mutations cause early onset forms of PD and DLB. It is particularly telling that duplications or triplications of the gene (7–9), which increase levels of α-synuclein with no alteration in sequence, also cause PD or DLB.α-Synuclein has been reported to be phosphorylated on serine residues, at Ser-87 and Ser-129 (10), although to date only the Ser-129 phosphorylation has been identified in the central nervous system (11, 12). Phosphorylation at tyrosine residues has been observed by some investigators (13, 14) but not by others (10–12). Phosphorylation at Ser-129 (p-Ser-129) is of particular interest because the majority of synuclein in Lewy bodies contains this modification (15). In addition, p-Ser-129 was found to be the most extensive and consistent modification in a survey of synuclein in Lewy bodies (11). Results have been mixed from studies investigating the function of phosphorylation using S129A and S129D mutations to respectively block and mimic the modification. Although the phosphorylation mimic was associated with pathology in studies in Drosophila (16) and in transgenic mouse models (17, 18), studies using adeno-associated virus vectors to overexpress α-synuclein in rat substantia nigra found an exacerbation of pathology with the S129A mutation, whereas the S129D mutation was benign, if not protective (19). Interpretation of these studies is complicated by a recent study showing that the S129D and S129A mutations themselves have effects on the aggregation properties of α-synuclein independent of their effects on phosphorylation, with the S129A mutation stimulating fibril formation (20). Clearly, determination of the role of p-Ser-129 phosphorylation would be helped by identification of the responsible kinase. In addition, identification will provide a pathologically relevant way to increase phosphorylation in a cell or animal model.Several kinases have been proposed to phosphorylate α-synuclein, including casein kinases 1 and 2 (10, 12, 21) and members of the G-protein-coupled receptor kinase family (22). In this report, we offer evidence that a member of the polo-like kinase (PLK) family, PLK2 (or serum-inducible kinase, SNK), functions as an α-synuclein kinase. The ability of PLK2 to directly phosphorylate α-synuclein at Ser-129 is established by overexpression in cell culture and by in vitro reaction with the purified kinase. We show that PLK2 phosphorylates α-synuclein in cells, including primary neuronal cultures, using a series of kinase inhibitors as well as inhibition of expression with RNA interference. In addition, inhibitor and knock-out studies in mouse brain support a role for PLK2 as an α-synuclein kinase in vivo.     

Detecting Morphologically Distinct Oligomeric Forms of ��-Synuclein

Neuropathologic and genetics studies as well as transgenic animal models have provided strong evidence linking misfolding and aggregation of α-synuclein to the progression of Parkinson disease (PD) and other related disorders. A growing body of evidence implicates various oligomeric forms of α-synuclein as the toxic species responsible for neurodegeneration and neuronal cell death. Although numerous different oligomeric forms of α-synuclein have been identified in vitro, it is not known which forms are involved in PD or how, when, and where different forms contribute to the progression of PD. Reagents that can interact with specific aggregate forms of α-synuclein would be very useful not only as tools to study how different aggregate forms affect cell function, but also as potential diagnostic and therapeutic agents for PD. Here we show that a single chain antibody fragment (syn-10H scFv) isolated from a phage display antibody library binds to a larger, later stage oligomeric form of α-synuclein than a previously reported oligomeric specific scFv isolated in our laboratory. The scFv described here inhibits aggregation of α-synuclein in vitro, blocks extracellular α-synuclein-induced toxicity in both undifferentiated and differentiated human neuroblastoma cell lines (SH-SY5Y), and specifically recognizes naturally occurring aggregates in PD but not in healthy human brain tissue.Parkinson disease (PD)² is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder of the elderly, affecting more than 500,000 people in the United States (1), with 50,000 new cases reported each year at an annual cost estimated at 10 billion dollars per year. Pathologically, PD is characterized by the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra and formation of fibrillar cytoplasmic inclusions known as Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites (2, 3). The protein α-synuclein has been strongly linked to PD (4, 5) and other related neurodegenerative disorders (6, 7) by several lines of evidence. 1) It is the major component of the hallmark Lewy body aggregates associated with PD. 2) Mutations (A53T, A30P, and E46K, where A30P is human A30P α-synuclein; A53T is human A53T α-synuclein; E46K is human E46K α-synuclein) or multiplication in the α-synuclein gene have been linked to familial PD (8–10). 3) Overexpression of α-synuclein in transgenic mice and Drosophila has been shown to induce the formation of PD-like pathological phenotypes and behavior, although the animal models do not in general replicate neuronal loss patterns (11, 12).α-Synuclein is a small protein (14 kDa) expressed mainly in brain tissues and is primarily localized at the presynaptic terminals of neurons (13). The primary structure of α-synuclein consists of three distinct regions. The N-terminal region of α-synuclein includes the mutation sites associated with familial PD (A53T, A30P, and E46K) and contains six imperfectly conserved repeats (KTKEGV) that may facilitate protein-protein binding. This repeat section is predicted to form amphipathic α-helices, typical of the lipid-binding domain of apolipoproteins (14). The central region, non-amyloid component, is extremely hydrophobic and includes a 12-residue stretch (VTGVTAVAQKTV) that is essential for aggregation (15). The C-terminal region is enriched with acidic glutamate and aspartate residues and is responsible for the chaperone function of α-synuclein (16).α-Synuclein normally exists as an unfolded protein, but it can adopt several different folded conformations depending on the environment, including small aggregates or oligomers, spherical and linear protofibrils, as well as the fibrillar structure found in Lewy bodies (14, 15). A growing body of evidence implicates the oligomeric forms of α-synuclein as the toxic species responsible for neurodegeneration and neuronal cell death (16–18). Several different oligomeric forms of α-synuclein including spherical, annular (19), pore-like (20), and dopamine-stabilized structures have been identified in vitro (21).α-Synuclein is considered a cytosolic protein, and consequently its pathogenic effect was assumed to be limited to the cytoplasm of single cells. However, recent studies have suggested that α-synuclein also has extracellular pathogenic effects (22–25). α-Synuclein was detected in blood plasma and cerebrospinal fluid in both monomeric and oligomeric forms (22–25), and the presence of significantly elevated levels of oligomeric species of α-synuclein has been reported extracellularly in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid samples from patients with PD (23). Furthermore, various studies have shown that aggregated α-synuclein added extracellularly to the culture medium is cytotoxic (26–32).Despite all these studies, it is still not clear how the various aggregate forms of α-synuclein are involved in the progression of PD. Therefore, reagents that can interact with specific aggregate forms of α-synuclein would be very useful not only for fundamental studies of how α-synuclein aggregates affect cell function but also as potential diagnostic and therapeutic agents for PD.Recently, we reported inhibition of both aggregation and extracellular toxicity of α-synuclein in vitro by a single chain variable domain antibody fragment (scFv) that specifically recognized an oligomeric form of α-synuclein (32). In this study, we describe a second scFv (syn-10H) that binds a larger later stage oligomeric form of α-synuclein than the previously reported scFv. The syn-10H scFv neutralizes α-synuclein-induced toxicity in both undifferentiated and differentiated SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell line and inhibits α-synuclein aggregation in vitro. The syn-10H scFv reacts specifically with homogenized PD brain tissue but does not cross-react with similarly treated samples taken from Alzheimer disease (AD) or healthy brain samples. Such scFvs therefore have potential value as diagnostic reagents to identify the presence of specific oligomeric species in PD tissue and fluid samples. The scFvs also have value as therapeutic agents as they can be used either extracellularly or expressed intracellularly (intrabodies) to prevent formation of toxic aggregates in vivo whether inside or outside of cells. Intrabodies have been used efficiently to neutralize toxic effects of different pathogenic agents, including α-synuclein (33–36). Moreover, immunization studies in mouse models of PD have shown that extracellular antibodies can reduce accumulation of intracellular aggregates of α-synuclein (37), thereby providing precedent for the use of scFvs in potential passive vaccination strategies for treating PD.     

The inhalation anesthetic desflurane induces caspase activation and increases amyloid beta-protein levels under hypoxic conditions

Perioperative factors including hypoxia, hypocapnia, and certain anesthetics have been suggested to contribute to Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathogenesis. Desflurane is one of the most commonly used inhalation anesthetics. However, the effects of desflurane on AD neuropathogenesis have not been previously determined. Here, we set out to assess the effects of desflurane and hypoxia on caspase activation, amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing, and amyloid β-protein (Aβ) generation in H4 human neuroglioma cells (H4 naïve cells) as well as those overexpressing APP (H4-APP cells). Neither 12% desflurane nor hypoxia (18% O₂) alone affected caspase-3 activation, APP processing, and Aβ generation. However, treatment with a combination of 12% desflurane and hypoxia (18% O₂) (desflurane/hypoxia) for 6 h induced caspase-3 activation, altered APP processing, and increased Aβ generation in H4-APP cells. Desflurane/hypoxia also increased levels of β-site APP-cleaving enzyme in H4-APP cells. In addition, desflurane/hypoxia-induced Aβ generation could be reduced by the broad caspase inhibitor benzyloxycarbonyl-VAD. Finally, the Aβ aggregation inhibitor clioquinol and γ-secretase inhibitor L-685,458 attenuated caspase-3 activation induced by desflurane/hypoxia. In summary, desflurane can induce Aβ production and caspase activation, but only in the presence of hypoxia. Pending in vivo confirmation, these data may have profound implications for anesthesia care in elderly patients, and especially those with AD.An estimated 200 million patients worldwide undergo surgery each year. Several reports have suggested that anesthesia and surgery may facilitate development of Alzheimer disease (AD)⁴ (1–3). A recent study also reported that patients having coronary artery bypass graft surgery under general anesthesia are at increased risk for AD as compared with those having percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty under local anesthesia (4).Genetic evidence, confirmed by neuropathological and biochemical findings, indicates that excessive production and/or accumulation of amyloid β-protein (Aβ) play a fundamental role in the pathology of AD (reviewed in Refs. 5 and 6). Aβ is produced via serial proteolysis of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by aspartyl protease β-site APP-cleaving enzyme (BACE), or β-secretase, andγ-secretase. BACE cleaves APP to generate a 99-residue membrane-associated C terminus fragment (APP-C99). APP-C99 is further cleaved by γ-secretase to release 4-kDa Aβ and β-amyloid precursor protein intracellular domain (7–9). Presenilin and γ-secretase co-fractionate as a detergent-sensitive, high molecular weight complex (10) that includes at least three other proteins, nicastrin/APH-2, APH-1, and PEN-2, all of which are necessary and sufficient for γ-secretase activity (11–13). Increasing evidence indicates that apoptosis is associated with a variety of neurodegenerative disorders, including AD (Refs. 14–17; reviewed in Ref. 18). Aβ has been shown to cause caspase activation and apoptosis, which can in turn potentiate Aβ generation (16, 19–28). Finally, fibrillar aggregates of Aβ and oligomeric species of Aβ are more neurotoxic (29–37).Perioperative factors, including hypoxia (38–42), hypocapnia (43), and anesthetics (44–47), have been reported to potentially contribute to AD neuropathogenesis. These perioperative factors may also cause post-operative cognitive dysfunction, a dementia associated with surgery and anesthesia, by triggering AD neuropathogenesis.Isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane are the most commonly used inhalation anesthetics. It has been reported that isoflurane enhances the oligomerization and cytotoxicity of Aβ (44) and induces apoptosis (48–51). Our recent studies have shown that a clinically relevant concentration of isoflurane can lead to caspase-3 activation, decrease cell viability, alter APP processing, and increase Aβ generation in human H4 neuroglioma cells overexpressing human APP (45–47). Loop et al. (49) reported that isoflurane and sevoflurane, but not desflurane, can induce caspase activation and apoptosis in human T lymphocytes. However, effects of desflurane and desflurane plus other perioperative risk factors, e.g. hypoxia, on APP processing and Aβ generation have not been assessed.In the present study, we set out to determine effects of desflurane, hypoxia, and the combination of the two (desflurane/hypoxia) on caspase-3 activation, APP processing, and Aβ generation in H4 human neuroglioma cells (H4 naïve cells) and H4 naïve cells stably transfected to express full-length (FL) APP (H4-APP cells). We also investigated whether the caspase inhibitor, Z-VAD, the γ-secretase inhibitor L-685,458, and the Aβ aggregation inhibitor clioquinol could attenuate desflurane/hypoxia-induced caspase-3 activation and Aβ generation.     

Effects of Differential Glycosylation of Glycodelins on Lymphocyte Survival

Glycodelin is a human glycoprotein with four reported glycoforms, namely glycodelin-A (GdA), glycodelin-F (GdF), glycodelin-C (GdC), and glycodelin-S (GdS). These glycoforms have the same protein core and appear to differ in their N-glycosylation. The glycosylation of GdA is completely different from that of GdS. GdA inhibits proliferation and induces cell death of T cells. However, the glycosylation and immunomodulating activities of GdF and GdC are not known. This study aimed to use ultra-high sensitivity mass spectrometry to compare the glycomes of GdA, GdC, and GdF and to study the relationship between the immunological activity and glycosylation pattern among glycodelin glycoforms. Using MALDI-TOF strategies, the glycoforms were shown to contain an enormous diversity of bi-, tri-, and tetra-antennary complex-type glycans carrying Galβ1–4GlcNAc (lacNAc) and/or GalNAcβ1–4GlcNAc (lacdiNAc) antennae backbones with varying levels of fucose and sialic acid substitution. Interestingly, they all carried a family of Sda (NeuAcα2–3(GalNAcβ1–4)Gal)-containing glycans, which were not identified in the earlier study because of less sensitive methodologies used. Among the three glycodelins, GdA is the most heavily sialylated. Virtually all the sialic acid on GdC is located on the Sda antennae. With the exception of the Sda epitope, the GdC N-glycome appears to be the asialylated counterpart of the GdA/GdF glycomes. Sialidase activity, which may be responsible for transforming GdA/GdF to GdC, was detected in cumulus cells. Both GdA and GdF inhibited the proliferation, induced cell death, and suppressed interleukin-2 secretion of Jurkat cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In contrast, no immunosuppressive effect was observed for GdS and GdC.Glycodelin is a member of the lipocalin family. It consists of 180 amino acid residues (1) with two sites of N-linked glycosylation. There are four reported glycodelin isoforms, namely glycodelin-A (amniotic fluid isoform, GdA),⁴ glycodelin-F (follicular fluid, GdF), glycodelin-C (cumulus matrix, GdC) and glycodelin-S (seminal plasma, GdS) (2–5). Among the four glycodelin isoforms, only the N-glycan structures of GdA and GdS have been previously determined. This was achieved using fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry (6, 7). The glycan structures of GdA and GdS are completely different. In GdA, the Asn-28 site carries high mannose, hybrid, and complex-type structures, whereas the second Asn-63 site is exclusively occupied by complex-type glycans (6). The major non-reducing epitopes characterized in the complex-type glycans are Galβ1–4GlcNAc (lacNAc), GalNAcβ1–4GlcNAc (lacdiNAc), NeuAcα2–6Galβ1–4GlcNAc (sialylated lacNAc), NeuAcα2–6GalNAcβ1–4GlcNAc (sialylated lacdiNAc), Galβ1–4(Fucα1–3)GlcNAc (Lewis-x), and GalNAcβ1–4(Fucα1–3)GlcNAc (lacdiNAc analog of the blood group substance Lewis-x) (6). Many of these oligosaccharides are rare in other human glycoproteins. GdS glycans are unusually fucose-rich, and the major complex type glycan structures are bi-antennary glycans with Lewis-x and Lewis-y antennae. Glycosylation of GdS is highly site-specific. Asn-28 contains only high mannose structures, whereas Asn-63 contains only complex type glycans. More than 80% of the complex glycans have 3–5 fucose residues/glycan, and none of the glycans is sialylated, which is unusual for a secreted human glycoprotein (7). The glycan structures of GdF and GdC are not known, although they differ in lectin-binding properties and isoelectric point from the other two glycodelin isoforms (5).Glycans are involved in various intracellular, intercellular, and cell-matrix recognition events (8, 9). Glycosylation determines the biological activities of the glycodelin isoforms (2, 10). For example, both GdA and GdF inhibit the spermatozoa-zona pellucida binding (11) via fucosyltransferase-5 (12), but only the latter inhibits progesterone-induced acrosome reaction, thus preventing a premature acrosome reaction of the spermatozoa. There is evidence that cumulus cells can convert exogenous GdA and -F to GdC, the physicochemical properties of which suggest that it is differently glycosylated compared with GdA/F (5). Moreover, GdC stimulated spermatozoa-zona pellucida binding in a dose-dependent manner, and it effectively displaced sperm-bound GdA and -F (4, 5). GdS suppresses capacitation probably via its inhibitory activity on cholesterol efflux from spermatozoa (13).Except for the effects on fertilization, GdA is involved in fetomaternal defense. This glycodelin isoform suppresses proliferation and induces apoptosis of T cells (2) and inhibits natural killer cell (14) and B-cell (15) activities. Glycosylation is involved in the binding of GdA to receptors on T cells (16). The sialic acid of GdA contributes to the apoptotic activity in T cells (17, 18) and binding to CD45, a potential GdA receptor (16). The importance of glycosylation in glycodelin is further shown by the absence of immunosuppressive activities in GdS with different glycosylation (18). The immunomodulating activities of GdF and GdC are unknown.Our previous work showed that glycans are indispensable for the different glycodelins to exhibit their binding activities and biological effects (13, 19, 20). The present study aims to identify the effect of all four glycodelin isoforms on lymphocyte viability, cell death, and interleukin-2 (IL-2) secretion and to correlate these bioactivities with their glycosylation patterns determined by mass spectrometry.