SUMO化修饰与DNA损伤修复

蛋白质的翻译后修饰在很大程度上决定了蛋白质的活性、细胞定位、稳定性及蛋白质之间的相互作用.而在DNA损伤修复过程中,通过调控不同修复蛋白的翻译后修饰来影响他们的活性及细胞定位,进而导致DNA损伤修复途径的不同和修复结果的差异.新近研究表明,蛋白质的SUMO化修饰在DNA损伤修复和基因组稳定性的维护方面发挥重要作用.本文将对SUMO化修饰对DNA损伤修复的调控的最新研究进展做一综述.     

泛素化与SUMO化对DNA损伤应答的调控作用

蛋白质翻译后修饰是实现蛋白质多样化功能的一种重要的调控方式,泛素化和SUMO化作为重要的蛋白质翻译后修饰在转录调节、染色质结构及基因组稳定性维持以及DNA修复中扮演重要角色。由于泛素(ubiquitin,Ub)、小泛素相关修饰物(small ubiquitin-related modifier,SUMO)都是修饰目标蛋白质上的赖氨酸,因此在通常情况下,二者对于同一个蛋白质的翻译后修饰存在拮抗或协同作用,但具体调控机理目前研究还不多。DNA损伤与肿瘤的发生发展密切相关。DNA损伤若未能得到及时修复或者修复过程中出现异常,将会导致肿瘤的发生,甚至会产生致死型突变。近年来,对于DNA损伤修复过程中涉及到的蛋白质翻译后修饰的研究已成为研究热点。本文旨在阐明泛素化、SUMO化对DNA损伤修复过程中关键因子的调控作用,为了解多种翻译后修饰对DNA修复过程的调控提供新视角。     

SUMO化修饰在DNA损伤响应中的作用

物理或化学等多种因素均可以引起DNA损伤。为维持机体基因组的稳定性,机体形成了精确完整的机制来修复损伤的／DNA。SUMO（smallubiquitin-relatedmodifier,SUMO）化修饰与其他蛋白翻译后修饰一样,具有多种生物学功能。近年来的研究表明,其在DNA损伤修复中也具有非常重要的作用。该文就DNA损伤修复、SUMO,96修饰系统及其二者关系的最新研究进展作了较为全面的介绍和总结。     

SUMO化: 一种重要的体内翻译后蛋白质修饰系统

靶蛋白被小泛素相关修饰物(small ubiquitin-related modifier,SUMO)修饰已经成为真核细胞特有的翻译后蛋白质修饰标志之一.SUMO与靶蛋白之间这种可逆的共价连接,在核质运输、DNA与蛋白质结合活性、蛋白质之间相互作用、转录调控、DNA修复以及维持基因组稳定等方面均发挥着重要的调节作用.在许多人类疾病如癌症和神经退化性疾病中,SUMO化修饰作用对疾病的发生与发展起着极为重要的作用.阐明SUMO化修饰在这些疾病中的功能,将为疾病的治疗开辟一条崭新的思路.     

PCNA泛素化修饰对DNA损伤应答途径的调控

机体细胞在多种化学物质和内外环境不断攻击下会诱发DNA损伤。为了维持基因组的稳定性,细胞内拥有一系列完善而精确的细胞应答机制来保护基因组DNA的完整性。细胞首先通过DNA损伤检测点,然后通过一系列细胞信号转导通路,启动细胞周期阻滞,进而介导细胞修复或凋亡。大量研究表明泛素化作为一种重要的蛋白质翻译后修饰方式,参与调控了多种细胞生理过程。近期研究表明,DNA损伤导致复制应激可诱发PCNA的翻译后泛素化修饰,泛素化修饰的PCNA可能参与了多种DNA损伤应激过程,影响细胞选择不同的DNA损伤应答途径,导致细胞截然不同的转归。因此,更好地了解PCNA泛素化的作用及其影响DNA损伤应答通路可为我们更深入地了解人类细胞如何调控异常的DNA代谢过程和癌症的发生和发展机制提供依据。     

PCNA泛素化修饰对DNA损伤应答途径的调控

机体细胞在多种化学物质和内外环境不断攻击下会诱发DNA损伤。为了维持基因组的稳定性,细胞内拥有一系列完善而精确的细胞应答机制来保护基因组DNA的完整性。细胞首先通过DNA损伤检测点,然后通过一系列细胞信号转导通路,启动细胞周期阻滞,进而介导细胞修复或凋亡。大量研究表明泛素化作为一种重要的蛋白质翻译后修饰方式,参与调控了多种细胞生理过程。近期研究表明,DNA损伤导致复制应激可诱发PCNA的翻译后泛素化修饰,泛素化修饰的PCNA可能参与了多种DNA损伤应激过程,影响细胞选择不同的DNA损伤应答途径,导致细胞截然不同的转归。因此,更好地了解PCNA泛素化的作用及其影响DNA损伤应答通路可为我们更深入地了解人类细胞如何调控异常的DNA代谢过程和癌症的发生和发展机制提供依据。     

Sirtuin家族与DNA损伤修复

DNA损伤的发生与积累是造成细胞功能紊乱的根本原因,也是引起衰老与肿瘤等疾病发生的关键事件。为维持机体自身遗传物质的完整性与稳定性,生物体内拥有多种针对不同类型DNA损伤的修复方式。Sirtuin蛋白是一组NAD+依赖的、高度保守的组蛋白去乙酰化酶,可通过去乙酰化作用调节众多底物蛋白质的表达、活性与稳定性。 近来的研究显示,DNA损伤修复途径的多个关键蛋白质是Sirtuin的下游底物。Sirtuin蛋白通过调节同源重组修复、非同源末端修复、核苷酸切除修复等途径中的核心蛋白质参与修复包括双链断裂（double stranded breakes, DSBs）在内的多种DNA损伤类型,从而在维持基因组稳定性、寿命以及细胞能量代谢调节等一系列生物学作用中发挥至关重要的作用。本综述将介绍近年来Sirtuin与DNA损伤修复的研究进展。     

SUMO化修饰在核受体功能调控中的作用

小泛素相关修饰蛋白(small ubiquitin related modifier,SUMO)修饰作用是蛋白质翻译后修饰的重要方式。SUMO化修饰与泛素化作用极为相似,并且在某些靶蛋白上可以与泛素竞争结合位点,从而起到稳定靶蛋白的作用,并参与调节靶蛋白的细胞定位、膜离子通道功能、DNA损伤修复以及转录活性等。核受体是一类在生物体内广泛分布的、配体依赖的转录因子超家族,参与机体生长发育、细胞分化,以及体内许多生理、病理过程中的基因表达调控。最近研究发现,核受体的SU-MO修饰可通过影响核受体的稳定性、转录活性、亚细胞定位等多重途径影响核受体的功能,并影响机体炎症反应及相关疾病的发生发展。本文对核受体的SUMO修饰在核受体功能调控中的作用,以及与机体相关疾病之间的关系做一简要综述。     

蛋白质SUMO化修饰研究进展

SUMO(small ubiquitin-related modifier)是类泛素蛋白家族的重要成员之一,可与多种蛋白结合发挥相应的功能,其分子结构及SUMO化反应途径都与泛素类似,但二者功能完全不同。SUMO化修饰可参与转录调节、核转运、维持基因组完整性及信号转导等多种细胞内活动,是一种重要的多功能的蛋白质翻译后修饰方式。SUMO化修饰功能的失调可能导致某些疾病的发生。     

早老素导致基因组不稳定的机制

基因组不稳定（genomic instability）是机体衰老的标志之一,也是儿童早老症（Hutchinson Gilford progeria syndrome, HGPS)患者细胞的典型特征。HGPS的发生与早老素（progerin)堆积密切相关,但早老素如何引起基因组不稳定尚缺乏系统性的阐述。基因组的结构稳定与DNA的正确复制、DNA损伤修复、端粒的维持和稳定以及表观遗传学修饰密切相关。本文主要讨论早老素在改变正常核纤层结构的基础上,通过影响相关通路关键蛋白质的水平或者定位,引起细胞内氧化应激增强、DNA复制应激和DNA损伤修复障碍,细胞DNA损伤增多和端粒的加速缩短,并在改变组蛋白甲基化和乙酰化方面导致基因组不稳定的机制。     

DNA损伤监测及修复相关酶与细胞衰老

衰老是细胞的重要生命现象之一,衰老假说之一认为细胞中残留DNA损伤的积累可加速细胞的衰老.因此,细胞内DNA损伤监测及修复系统的正常运行与细胞衰老调控密切相关,DNA损伤监测及修复相关酶如PARP、DNA-PK、ATM、p53等在细胞衰老中的调控作用日益受到广泛关注.研究这些蛋白质分子间的相互作用及其在细胞衰老过程中的调控功能,有利于揭示DNA损伤应激、损伤修复调控与细胞衰老之间的内在联系,为抗衰老研究及从衰老角度治疗肿瘤提供新的思路.     

The role of DNA damage in neural stem cells ageing

Neural stem cells (NSCs) are pluripotent stem cells with the potential to differentiate into a variety of nerve cells. NSCs are susceptible to both intracellular and extracellular insults, thus causing DNA damage. Extracellular insults include ultraviolet, ionizing radiation, base analogs, modifiers, alkyl agents and others, while intracellular factors include Reactive oxygen species (ROS) radicals produced by mitochondria, mismatches that occur during DNA replication, deamination of bases, loss of bases, and more. When encountered with DNA damage, cells typically employ three coping strategies: DNA repair, damage tolerance, and apoptosis. NSCs, like many other stem cells, have the ability to divide, differentiate, and repair DNA damage to prevent mutations from being passed down to the next generation. However, when DNA damage accumulates over time, it will lead to a series of alterations in the metabolism of cells, which will cause cellular ageing. The ageing and exhaustion of neural stem cell will have serious effects on the body, such as neurodegenerative diseases. The purpose of this review is to examine the processes by which DNA damage leads to NSCs ageing and the mechanisms of DNA repair in NSCs.     

Uhrf2 is important for DNA damage response in vascular smooth muscle cells

Emerging evidence shows that Uhrf1 plays an important role in DNA damage response for maintaining genomic stability. Interestingly, Uhrf1 has a paralog Uhrf2 in mammals. Uhrf1 and Uhrf2 share similar domain architectures. However, the role of Uhrf2 in DNA damage response has not been studied yet. During the analysis of the expression level of Uhrf2 in different tissues, we found that Uhrf2 is highly expressed in aorta and aortic vascular smooth muscle cells. Thus, we studied the role of Uhrf2 in DNA damage response in aortic vascular smooth muscle cells. Using laser microirradiation, we found that like Uhrf1, Uhrf2 was recruited to the sites of DNA damage. We dissected the functional domains of Uhrf2 and found that the TTD, PHD and SRA domains are important for the relocation of Uhrf2 to the sites of DNA damage. Moreover, depletion of Uhrf2 suppressed DNA damage-induced H2AX phosphorylation and DNA damage repair. Taken together, our results demonstrate the function of Uhrf2 in DNA damage response.     

Give me a break: How telomeres suppress the DNA damage response

Linear organization of the genome requires mechanisms to protect and replicate chromosome ends. To this end eukaryotic cells evolved telomeres, specialized nucleoproteic complexes, and telomerase, the enzyme that maintains the telomeric DNA. Telomeres allow cells to distinguish chromosome ends from sites of DNA damage. In mammalian cells this is accomplished by a protein complex, termed shelterin, that binds to telomeric DNA and is able to shield chromosome ends from the DNA damage machinery. In recent years, we have seen major advances in our understanding of how this protein complex works due to the generation of mouse models carrying mutations of individual shelterin components. This review will focus on our current understanding of how the shelterin complex is able to suppress the DNA damage response pathways, and on the cellular and organismal outcomes of telomere dysfunction.     

DNA damage response and repair in ovarian cancer: Potential targets for therapeutic strategies

Ovarian cancer is among the most lethal gynecologic malignancies with a poor survival prognosis. The current therapeutic strategies involve surgery and chemotherapy. Research is now focused on novel agents especially those targeting DNA damage response (DDR) pathways. Understanding the DDR process in ovarian cancer necessitates having a detailed knowledge on a series of signaling mediators at the cellular and molecular levels. The complexity of the DDR process in ovarian cancer and how this process works in metastatic conditions is comprehensively reviewed. For evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic agents targeting DNA damage in ovarian cancer, we will discuss the components of this system including DDR sensors, DDR transducers, DDR mediators, and DDR effectors. The constituent pathways include DNA repair machinery, cell cycle checkpoints, and apoptotic pathways. We also will assess the potential of active mediators involved in the DDR process such as therapeutic and prognostic candidates that may facilitate future studies.     

细胞DNA损伤检控点

细胞周期检控点是维持细胞基因组稳定性的一个重要机制,主要包括。DNA损伤检控点、DNA复制检控点和纺锤体组装检控点。其中DNA损伤检控点能检测细胞在生命活动过程中出现的DNA损伤并引发细胞周期阻滞,为修复损伤提供足够的时间,以保证细胞遗传的稳定性。有关DNA损伤检控点的研究近年来已经取得了突破性进展,现简要介绍近年来在DNA损伤检控点研究中的一些新进展。     

Diverse functions of DNA glycosylases processing oxidative base lesions in brain

Endogenous and exogenous oxidative agents continuously damage genomic DNA, with the brain being particularly vulnerable. Thus, preserving genomic integrity is key for brain health and neuronal function. Accumulation of DNA damage is one of the causative factors of ageing and increases the risk of a wide range of neurological disorders. Base excision repair is the major pathway for removal of oxidized bases in the genome and initiated by DNA glycosylases. Emerging evidence suggest that DNA glycosylases have non-canonical functions important for genome regulation. Understanding canonical and non-canonical functions of DNA glycosylases processing oxidative base lesions modulating brain function will be crucial for the development of novel therapeutic strategies.     

DNA损伤检验点与损伤修复及基因组稳定性

生物有机体基因组DNA经常会受到内源或外源因素的影响而导致结构发生变化,产生损伤;在长期进化过程中,有机体也相应形成了一系列应对与修复损伤DNA,并维持染色体基因组正常结构功能的机制。其中DNA损伤检验点（DNA damage checkpoint）就是在感应DNA损伤的基础上,对损伤感应信号进行转导,或引起细胞周期的暂停,从而使细胞有足够的时间对损伤DNA进行修复,或最终导致细胞发生凋亡。DNA损伤检验点信号转导途径是一个高度保守的信号感应过程,整个途径大致可以分为损伤感应、信号传递及信号效应3个组成部分。其中3-磷脂酰肌醇激酶家族类成员ATM（ataxia-telangiectasia mutated）和ATR（ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3-related）活性的增加构成整个途径活化的第一步。它们通过激活下游的效应激酶,Chk2／Chk1,通过协同作用许多其他调控细胞周期、DNA复制、DNA损伤修复及细胞凋亡等过程的蛋白质因子来实现细胞对DNA损伤的高度协调反应。近十几年,随着此领域研究的不断深入,人们逐步揭示了DNA损伤检验点途径发生过程中,各种核心组分通过与不同调节因子、效应因子及DNA损伤修复蛋白间的复杂相互作用,以实现监测感应异常DNA结构并实施相应反应的机制;其中,检验点衔接因子（mediators）及染色质结构,尤其是核小体组蛋白的共价修饰在调控ATM／ATR活性,促进ATM／ATR与底物间的相互作用以及介导DNA损伤位点周围染色质区域上多蛋白复合物在时间与空间上的动态形成发挥着重要的作用。同时,人们也开始发现DNA损伤检验点途径与DNA损伤修复、基因组稳定性以及肿瘤发生等过程之间某些内在的联系。该反应途径在通过协调细胞针对DNA损伤做出各种反应的基础上,直接或间接地参与或调控DNA损伤修复过程,并与DNA损伤修复途径协同作用最终保证染色体基凶组结构的完整性,而检验点途径的改变,则会引起基因组不稳定的发生,包括从突变频率的提高到大范围的染色体重排,以及染色体数量的畸变。如：突变发生在肿瘤形成早期,会大大增加肿瘤发生的几率。文章将对DNA损伤检验点途径机制及其对DNA损伤修复、基因组稳定性影响的最新进展进行综述。     

DNA Damage Checkpoint, Damage Repair, and Genome Stability

Genomic DNA is under constant attack from both endogenous and exogenous sources of DNA damaging agents. Without proper care, the ensuing DNA damages would lead to alteration of genomic structure thus affecting the faithful transmission of genetic information. During the process of evolution, organisms have acquired a series of mechanisms responding to and repairing DNA damage, thus assuring the maintenance of genome stability and faithful transmission of genetic information. DNA damage checkpoint is one such important mechanism by which, in the face of DNA damage, a cell can respond to amplified damage signals, either by actively halting the cell cycle until it ensures that critical processes such as DNA replication or mitosis are complete or by initiating apoptosis as a last resort. Over the last decade, complex hierarchical interactions between the key components like ATM/ATR in the checkpoint pathway and various other mediators, effectors including DNA damage repair proteins have begun to emerge. In the meantime, an intimate relationship between mechanisms of damage checkpoint pathway, DNA damage repair, and genome stability was also uncovered. Reviewed hereinare the recent findings on both the mechanisms of activation of checkpoint pathways and their coordination with DNA damage repair machinery as well as their effect on genomic integrity.     

Oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding fold proteins: a growing family of genome guardians

The maintenance of genomic stability relies on the coordinated action of a number of cellular processes, including activation of the DNA-damage checkpoint, DNA replication, DNA repair, and telomere homeostasis. Many proteins involved in these cellular processes use different types of functional modules to regulate and execute their functions. Recent studies have revealed that many DNA-damage checkpoint and DNA repair proteins in human cells possess the oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding (OB) fold domains, which are known to bind single-stranded DNA in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Furthermore, during the DNA damage response, the OB folds of the human checkpoint and DNA repair proteins play critical roles in DNA binding, protein complex assembly, and regulating protein–protein interactions. These findings suggest that the OB fold is an evolutionarily conserved functional module that is widely used by genome guardians. In this review, we will highlight the functions of several well-characterized or newly discovered eukaryotic OB-fold proteins in the DNA damage response.