Interleukin-10 gene polymorphisms and chronic/aggressive periodontitis susceptibility: A meta-analysis based on 14 case-control studies

Interleukin-10 (IL-10) has been described as an anti-inflammatory cytokine and IL-10 gene polymorphisms was associated with altered interleukin-10 levels, therefore, we aimed to conduct a meta-analysis assessing the association of IL-10 genetic polymorphisms with the risk of both chronic periodontitis (CP) and aggressive periodontitis (AgP). Electronic databases were acquired from PubMed, Embase, the Sinomed and WANFANG. Fourteen studies with 1438 patients and 1303 control subjects investigated the association of the three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of IL-10 (-1082A>G, -819C>T, -592C>A) and chronic/aggressive periodontitis risk were brought into this study. We found that there was no association between IL-10 -1082 gene polymorphism and periodontitis risk (either CP or AgP), even when we separately investigated sub-group analysis among Caucasians. The -819 polymorphism seemed to be a genetic risk factor to CP among Caucasians (T allele vs. C allele: OR=1.55, 95%CI=1.07-2.24; CT vs. CC: OR=1.64, 95%CI=1.00-2.67). When excluding one study deviated from HWE, the results showed that the T allele carriers had a significantly risk of CP in overall population (T allele vs. C allele: OR=1.23, 95%CI=1.03-1.48). Furthermore, the results of this meta-analysis showed that -592 polymorphism was associated with a significantly increased risk of CP (A allele vs. C allele: OR=1.38, 95%CI=1.04-1.85; AA vs. CA+CC: OR=1.39, 95%CI=1.05-1.85 for overall analysis; A allele vs. C allele: OR=1.97, 95%CI=1.36-3.86; AA vs. CC: OR=3.70, 95%CI=1.32-10.39; CA vs. CC: OR=2.22, 95%CI=1.36-3.64, AA+CA vs. CC: OR=2.35, 95%CI=1.46-3.79 for Caucasian descent analysis). This meta-analysis suggested that IL-10 -819 and -592 gene polymorphisms were associated with CP, especially among Caucasians. Further research is needed to assess possible gene-gene or gene-environment-lifestyle interactions on periodontal disease..     

The E-cadherin (CDH1) -160C>A polymorphism associated with gastric cancer among Asians but not Europeans

E-cadherin (CDH1) is a tumor suppressor gene involved in epithelial cell-cell interactions and plays important roles in the etiology of gastric cancer. Studies reporting conflicting results on the role of -160C>A polymorphism in the CDH1 promoter region on gastric cancer risk led us to perform a meta-analysis to investigate this relationship. Thirteen published case-control studies including 2509 gastric cancer cases and 3687 controls were identified. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association. Overall, individuals with the variant genotypes were not associated with a significant gastric cancer risk (AA vs. CC: OR?=?1.04, 95% CI: 0.74-1.48; CA vs. CC: 1.02, 0.85-1.21; AA/CA vs. CC: 1.03, 0.86-1.22; AA vs. CA/CC: 1.03, 0.74-1.43). However, in the stratified analysis by ethnicity, significantly decreased gastric cancer risk was found among Asians in dominant model (AA/CA vs. CC: 0.84, 0.72-0.99). Further, when stratified by clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric cancer, no statistically significant result was observed for any analysis. The results suggested that the CDH1 -160C>A polymorphism may contribute to susceptibility to gastric cancer among Asians. Additional well-designed large studies will be required to validate this association in different populations.     

Vascular endothelial growth factor gene polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an endothelial cell-specific mitogen involved in a number of pathologic processes, including angiogenesis, tumor growth and metastasis. Polymorphisms of the VEGF gene have been associated with susceptibility to colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the specific association still remains controversial. We made a meta-analysis of the association between VEGF gene polymorphisms and CRC risk. Only eight case-control studies were retrieved, with a total of 2337 CRC patients and 2032 healthy controls. Six VEGF gene polymorphisms were addressed in all studies included, +936C>T (rs3025039), -2578C>A (rs699947), -1154G>A (rs1570360), -634G>C (rs2010963), -460C>T (rs833061), and +405C>G (rs2010963). There was a significant association between -2578C>A polymorphism and susceptibility to CRC in the comparison of C allele carriers (CC + CA) versus AA (odds ratio = 0.77, 95% confidence interval = 0.62-0.96, P = 0.02). No association was found between +936C>T, -1154G>A, -634G>C, -460C>T, and +405C>G with susceptibility to CRC. We conclude that the C allele carrier (CC + CA) of VEGF -2578C>A polymorphism appears to be a protective factor for CRC.     

Association of excision repair cross-complimentary group 1 gene polymorphisms with breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility

The role of excision repair cross-complimentary group 1 (ERCC1) gene polymorphisms in breast and ovarian cancer development has long been controversial and existing data were inconsistent. Here, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to better clarify the association. Case-control studies published from December 2008 to November 2018 were assessed. The statistical analyses of the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Fifteen articles with 24 case-control studies and 3 ERCC1 polymorphisms were enrolled. A total of 20 923 participants including 9896 cases and 11 027 controls were analyzed. The results showed that C to T variation in the ERCC1 rs11615 (C/T) polymorphisms was correlated with breast cancer susceptibility (T vs C: OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.02-1.38; TT + CT vs CC: OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.12-1.36). ERCC1 rs3212986 (C/A) polymorphisms posed an increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer as whole (A vs C: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.01-1.25; AA + CA vs CC: OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.02-1.22), and presented especially higher risk for ovarian cancer (A vs C: OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.05-1.63; AA vs CA + CC: OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.12-2.47; AA vs CC: OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.12-2.64). Meanwhile, neither overall group analyses nor stratified analyses displayed any association of ERCC1 rs2298881 (A/C) polymorphisms in breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility. This meta-analysis suggested that ERCC1 rs11615 (C/T) polymorphisms were associated with breast cancer susceptibility and rs3212986 (C/A) polymorphisms were especially correlated with ovarian cancer risk. More case-control studies with well-adjusted data and diverse populations are essential for validation of our conclusion.     

MTHFR polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis

The C677T and A1298C polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) have been reported to alter the risk of ovarian cancer. However, the results are still inconclusive. For better understanding of the effect of these two polymorphisms on ovarian cancer risk, a meta-analysis was performed. An extensive search was performed to identify all case–control studies investigating such association. The strength of association between these two polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk was assessed by odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95?% confidence interval (95?% CI). 3,496 cases and 3,631 controls for C677T polymorphism and 3,280 cases and 3,346 controls for A1298C polymorphism were included in this meta-analysis. The results suggested that there were no significant associations between C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk in overall comparisons in all genetic models (For C677T: TT vs. CC: OR?=?0.94, 95?% CI?=?0.71–1.24, P?=?0.65; CT vs. CC: OR?=?1.03, 95?% CI?=?0.93–1.14, P?=?0.57; TT/CT vs. CC: OR?=?1.01, 95?% CI?=?0.88–1.16, P?=?0.87; TT vs. CC/CT: OR?=?0.93, 95?% CI?=?0.72–1.20, P?=?0.58. For A1298C: CC vs. AA: OR?=?1.05, 95?% CI?=?0.88–1.25, P?=?0.65; CA vs. AA: OR?=?0.98, 95?% CI?=?0.88–1.08, P?=?0.66; CC/CA vs. AA: OR?=?0.99, 95?% CI?=?0.90–1.09, P?=?0.85; CC vs. AA/CA: OR?=?1.06, 95?% CI?=?0.90–1.26, P?=?0.46). Subgroup analysis based on ethnicities and influence analysis did not perturb the results. In conclusion, the results of this meta-analysis indicate that the MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms are not associated with ovarian cancer risk, especially in Caucasians.     

XPC Lys939Gln and Ala499Val polymorphisms in colorectal cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis of case–control studies

The XPC Lys939Gln and Ala499Val polymorphisms were likely to be involved with the development of colorectal cancer. However, there had been inconsistent reports of association. This meta-analysis of literatures was performed to draw a more precise estimation of the relationship. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for relevant articles with a time limit of December 2012. The strength of association between the XPC Lys939Gln and Ala499Val polymorphisms and colorectal cancer susceptibility were assessed by odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI). This meta-analysis including six case–control studies evaluated the associations between the two XPC polymorphisms (Lys939Gln, Ala499Val) and colorectal cancer susceptibility. For XPC Lys939Gln, no obvious associations were found for all genetic models [CC vs AA: OR (95 % CI) = 1.12 (0.94–1.32); CA vs AA: OR (95 % CI) = 1.08 (0.94–1.24); the dominant model: OR (95 % CI) = 1.09 (0.97–1.23); the recessive model: OR (95 % CI) = 1.07 (0.92–1.25)]. For XPC Ala499Val, no obvious associations were also not found for all genetic models [TT vs CC: OR (95 % CI) = 0.84 (0.65–1.10); CT vs CC: OR (95 % CI) = 1.00 (0.86–1.15); the dominant model: OR (95 % CI) = 0.98 (0.85–1.12); the recessive model: OR (95 % CI) = 0.87 (0.67–1.12)]. This meta-analysis suggested that both the XPC Lys939Gln and Ala499Val polymorphisms were not risk factors for increasing colorectal cancer.     

The E-cadherin (CDH1) -C160A polymorphism and colorectal cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

E-cadherin, encoded by the CDH1 gene, involves in invasion and metastasis of cancer cells. CDH1 -C160A polymorphism was shown to contribute to genetic susceptibility to colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the results from different studies remain controversial. This study was conducted to further explore the association between CDH1 -C160A genetic polymorphism and CRC susceptibility by means of a meta-analysis. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify all case-control studies of CDH1 -C160A polymorphism and risk for CRC. A total of nine eligible studies, including 7954 CRC cases and 7369 controls, were identified to the meta-analysis. On the whole, the meta-analysis indicated that CDH1 -C160A genetic polymorphism could reduce the risk of CRC under AA versus CC contrast (odds ratio [OR]=0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.75-0.98, p(heterogeneity)=0.11), recessive model (OR=0.88, 95% CI=0.77-0.99, p(heterogeneity)=0.23), dominant model (OR=0.92, 95% CI=0.87-0.99, p(heterogeneity)=0.11), and allele A versus allele C contrast (OR=0.93, 95% CI=0.88-0.98, p(heterogeneity)=0.26). A conclusion could be drawn from the research that CDH1 -C160A polymorphism provides a possible protection against CRC, which is especially evident in Caucasian and hospital populations.     

Association between CASP3 polymorphisms and overall cancer risk: A meta-analysis of case-control studies

Several studies inspected the relationship between caspase-3 (CASP3) polymorphisms and the risk of several human cancers, but the findings remain controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis aiming to inspect the association between CASP3 rs1049216 T>C, rs12108497 C>T, rs4647603 G>A, rs4647602 C>A, rs6948 T>G, rs2705897 A>C, and rs113420705 G>A polymorphisms and cancer risk. Eligible studies were recognized by searching the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to quantitatively evaluate the association between each polymorphism of CASP3 and cancer risk. The rs4647603 variant significantly increased the risk of cancer in an overdominant (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.03-2.01; P = 0.03; AG vs AA+GG) inheritance model. Regarding the rs4647602 variant, the findings revealed that this variant was associated with protection against cancer in homozygous codominant (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.56-0.80; P < 0.00001; AA vs CC), dominant (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.96; P = 0.009; AC+AA vs CC), recessive (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-0.79; P < 0.00001; AA vs AC+CC), and allele (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.88; P = 0.00001; A vs C) models. The findings suggested that the rs2705897 variant significantly decreased the risk of cancer in heterozygous codominant (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.94; P = 0.009; AC vs AA), dominant (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95; P = 0.009; AC+CC vs AA), overdominant (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.95; P = 0.01; AC vs CC+AA), and allele (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.97; P = 0.02; C vs A) models. The results did not support an association between CASP3 rs1049216 and rs6948 polymorphisms and cancer risk. In summary, the findings of this meta-analysis support an association between CASP3 polymorphisms and cancer risk. Larger and well-designed studies are desired to evaluate these associations in detail.     

CDH1 promoter polymorphism and stomach cancer susceptibility

The relationship of stomach cancer susceptibility and the presence of E-cadherin (CDH1) promoter −160 C/A polymorphism had been reported with conflicting results. To further explore the association of this polymorphism with stomach cancer susceptibility, we performed an extensive search of relevant studies and carried out a meta-analysis to obtain a more precise estimate. A total of 16 studies including 2,611 cases and 3,788 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. When all studies involved, the meta-analysis results suggest no statistically significant association between CDH1 −160 C/A polymorphism and stomach cancer risk (CA vs. CC: OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.85–1.19; AA vs. CC: OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.75–1.46; dominant model: OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.86–1.20; recessive model: OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.76–1.41). When subgroup analyses were performed by ethnicity, the A-allele carriers conferred a decreased stomach cancer risk in Asians (AA vs. CC: OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47–0.96; dominant model: OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.72–0.99), but no statistically significant association was found in Caucasians. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that CDH1 −160 A-allele may play a protective role of stomach cancer development in Asians but not in Caucasians.     

Role of NQO1 609C>T and NQO2 ?3423G>A gene polymorphisms in esophageal cancer risk in Kashmir valley and meta analysis

Esophageal cancer (EC) is a complex multifactorial disorder, where environmental and genetic factors play major role. NADPH:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) and NRH:quinone oxidoreductase 2 (NQO2) are phase II cytosolic enzymes that catalyze metabolism of quinones, important in the detoxification of environmental carcinogens. A case-control study was performed to investigated the associations of NQO1 609C>T and NQO2 -3423G>A polymorphisms with susceptibility to EC in a high-risk Kashmiri population of India in 135 EC patients and 195 unrelated healthy controls using PCR-RFLP. We also performed a meta analysis of nine published studies (1,224 cases and 1,740 controls) on NQO1 609C>T and evaluated the association between the NQO1 609C>T polymorphisms and esophageal cancer risk. A significant difference in NQO1 609C>T and NQO2 -3423G>A genotype distribution between EC cases and corresponding controls groups was observed (OR = 2.65; 95 % CI = 1.29-5.42 and OR = 1.88; 95 % CI = 1.02-3.49 respectively). Further, gene-gene interaction showed significantly increased risk for esophageal adenocarcinoma with variant genotypes of NQO1 609C>T and NQO2 -3423G>A polymorphisms and interaction with environmental risk factors revealed pronounced risk of EC with NQO1 609C>T TT genotype in high salted tea users of Kashmir valley (OR = 3.72, 95 % CI = 0.98-14.19). Meta analysis of NQO 609C>T polymorphism also suggested association of the polymorphism with EC in Asians as well as Europeans. In conclusion, NQO1 609C>T and NQO2 -3423G>A genetic variations modulate risk of EC in high-risk Kashmir population.     

Lack of association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene A1298C polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility

Published data on the association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene (MTHFR) A1298C polymorphism and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched. Crude ORs with 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of association between the MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and breast cancer risk. The pooled ORs were performed for co-dominant model (AC vs. AA, CC vs. AA), dominant model (CC+AC vs. AA), and recessive model (CC vs. AC+AA), respectively. A total of 26 studies including 12,244 cases and 15,873 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significant associations were found between MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and breast cancer risk when all studies pooled into the meta-analysis (AC vs. AA: OR=0.99, 95% CI 0.94-1.05; CC vs. AA: OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90-1.09; dominant model: OR=0.99, 95% CI 0.95-1.04; and recessive model: OR=0.98, 95% CI 0.90-1.08). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity or study design, still no significant associations were found for all comparison models. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the MTHFR A1298C polymorphism may be not associated with breast cancer development. However, large sample and representative population-based studies with homogeneous breast cancer patients and well matched controls are warranted to confirm this finding.     

APOC3/A5 haplotypes, lipid levels, and risk of myocardial infarction in the Central Valley of Costa Rica

Genetic variation in the APOC3 and APOA5 genes has been associated with plasma triglyceride concentrations and may affect the risk of myocardial infarction (MI). To assess whether APOC3/A5 haplotypes are associated with risk of MI, we examined three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in APOC3 (3238C>G, -455T>C, and -482C>T) and six SNPs in the APOA5 gene (-1131T>C, c.-3A>G, c.56C>G, IVS3+476G>A, c.553G>T, and c.1259T>C) in incident cases (n = 1,703) of a first nonfatal MI matched for gender, age, and area of residence with population-based controls (n = 1,703). Conditional logistic regression models, adjusted for potential environmental confounders, were used for analysis. The common APOC3*222 haplotype was more frequent in cases than in controls (17.4% and 13.7%, respectively, P < 0.001) and was associated with increased risk of MI [odds ratio (OR) = 1.27; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.09, 1.48] compared with APOC3*111 wild-type haplotype. This association was independent of the APOA5 SNPs. Although the APOC3 3238G, APOA5 -1131C, APOA5 c.-3G, and APOA5 c.1259C alleles were associated with higher triglyceride plasma concentrations, these effects could not explain the associations with MI in this population. In summary, this study supports the hypothesis that haplotypes in the APOC3 gene but not in the APOA5 gene increase susceptibility to MI.     

Genetic variability in IL23R and risk of colorectal adenoma and colorectal cancer

Inflammatory processes, including, specifically, the inflammatory conditions Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) predispose to colorectal cancer. Interleukin-23 is involved in pro-inflammatory signaling; genetic variation in the interleukin-23 receptor (IL23R) has been consistently associated with CD and UC risk. In three case-control studies of colorectal adenoma (n=485 cases/578 controls), colon cancer (n=1424 cases/1780 controls) and rectal cancer (n=583 cases/775 controls), we investigated associations with 18 candidate and tagSNPs in IL23R. The three studies used an identical Illumina GoldenGate assay, allowing thorough investigation across stages and locations of colorectal neoplasia. We further explored associations with molecular cancer subtypes (MSI+, CIMP+, KRAS2mut, TP53mut). In this comprehensive study of genetic variability in IL23R across the spectrum of colorectal carcinogenesis, as well as within colon and rectal tumor molecular subtypes, we observed associations between SNPs in IL23R and risk of rectal cancer: the 88413 C>A (rs10889675) and 69450 C>A (rs7542081) polymorphisms were associated with decreased rectal cancer risk overall (p-trend=0.04 and 0.05 respectively), and specifically with rectal tumors bearing a TP53 mutation (88413 CA/AA vs. CC OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.46-94; 69450 CA/AA vs. CC OR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.37-0.98). However, none of associations remained statistically significant after correction for multiple testing. These data provide some evidence that genetic variability in IL23R may contribute to rectal cancer risk and should be evaluated in additional studies.     

Polymorphisms in the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 gene and acute rejection risk in transplant recipients

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) gene polymorphisms have been reported to influence the risk for acute rejection (AR) in transplant recipients. However, the results still remain controversial and ambiguous. The objective of the current study was to conduct a meta-analysis investigating the association between polymorphisms in the CTLA-4 gene and the risk of AR in transplant recipients. Electronic searches for all publications were conducted on associations between this variant and acute rejection in Medline and Embase databases through November 2011. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate the strength of the association. Three polymorphisms (+49 adenine/guanine [+49A/G], -318 cytosine/thymine [-318C/T], and the +6230G/A polymorphism [CT60]) in 18 case-control studies from ten articles were analyzed. This meta-analysis included 2,081 cases of transplant recipients in which 813 cases developed AR and 1,268 cases did not develop AR. The results indicated that there was no statistically significant association between the risk of AR and the +49A/G polymorphism or the -318C/T polymorphism (+49A/G: OR = 0.876, 95 % CI = 0.650-1.180 for GG vs. AA; OR = 1.121, 95 % CI = 0.911-1.379 for AG + GG vs. AA; -318C/T: OR = 0.397, 95 % CI = 0.138-1.143 for TT vs. CC; OR = 0.987, 95 %CI = 0.553-1.760 for CT + TT vs. CC). However, individuals who carried CT60 A allele might have a decreased risk of AR (AA vs. GG OR = 0.535, 95 % CI = 0.340-0.841, A vs. G OR = 0.759, 95 % CI = 0.612-0.914) in liver transplant recipients among Europeans, but because only two studies were included, so the result should be caution. In further stratified analyses for the +49A/G and the -318C/T polymorphisms, no obvious significant associations were found in subgroups of renal transplant recipients and Europeans, a reduced incidence of acute rejection was observed in liver transplant recipients that are homogenous for +49G (OR = 0.638, 95 % CI = 0.427-0.954 for GG vs. AA/AG), while this has not been observed in renal transplant recipients. Overall this meta-analysis suggests that +49A/G and the -318C/T polymorphisms in CTLA-4 may be not associated with the risk of rejection after organ transplantation, but CTLA +49A/G and +6230G/A polymorphisms may be associated with acute rejection after liver transplantation, not after renal transplantation. In future, more studies should be included to evaluate the association between +6230G/A polymorphism and AR risk.     

The association between common genetic variant of microRNA-146a and cancer susceptibility

Published data on the association between microRNA-146a (miR-146a) G/C polymorphism and cancer susceptibility are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. A total of 23 studies including 10,585 cases and 12,183 controls were used in the meta-analysis. Overall, no significant associations were found between miR-146a G/C polymorphism and cancer risk when all studies pooled into the meta-analysis (GC vs. CC: OR=1.08, 95% CI=0.94-1.24; GG vs. CC: OR=1.13, 95% CI=0.93-1.37; dominant model: OR=1.09, 95% CI=0.94-1.26). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, still no significant associations were found. In the subgroup analysis by cancer type, statistically significantly increased risks were found for papillary thyroid carcinoma (GC vs. CC: OR=3.44, 95% CI=1.86-6.34; GG vs. CC: OR=2.20, 95% CI=1.22-3.99; dominant model: OR=2.68, 95% CI=1.48-4.83). In the subgroup analysis by population-based controls or hospital-based controls, no statistically significantly increased risks were found. Despite some limitations, this meta-analysis suggests that the miR-146a G allele is a low-penetrant risk factor for papillary thyroid carcinoma development.     

Association between polymorphisms in the promoter region of interleukin-10 and susceptibility to inflammatory bowel disease

The aim of this study was to assess the association of polymorphisms in the promoter region of the IL-10 gene with the risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Fifteen studies (3,693 cases and 4,574 controls) were included in a meta-analysis of association between IL-10 ?1082G/A, ?819C/T and ?592C/A polymorphisms, and IBD, CD and UC using allele contrast and the recessive, dominant, and additive models. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was confirmed for each study. Heterogeneity and study quality were investigated using stratification analyses and sensitivity analyses. Polymorphism ?1082G/A showed significant association with CD, with odds ratios (ORs) for the GG + GA genotype and GG versus AA genotype of 1.278 (1.004–1.627) and 1.238 (1.027–1.492) in all subjects. Significant associations were found in the Caucasian subgroup using the allele contrast, dominant, and additive models. C-allele carriers of the ?819C/T polymorphism were at increased risk of IBD (OR 1.093, 95 % CI 1.004–1.190). Association with the ?819C/T polymorphism was also found in Caucasians with CD (C vs. T: OR 1.104, 95 % CI 1.010–1.206; CC + CT vs. TT: OR 1.328, 95 % CI 1.006–1.754; CC vs. TT: OR 1.339, 95 % CI 1.008–1.778), and with UC (CC vs. CT + TT: OR 1.188, 95 % CI 1.019–1.385). No significant association was found between the ?592C/A polymorphism and IBD, CD or UC. In conclusion, the meta-analysis demonstrated clear association between the IL-10 polymorphisms ?1082G/A and ?819C/T and the risk of IBD.     

Lack of an association between -308G>A polymorphism of the TNF-α gene and liver cirrhosis risk based on a meta-analysis

TNF-α is a potential proinflammatory cytokine that plays an important role in the pathogenesis of liver cirrhosis. We investigated a possible association between TNF-α -308G>A polymorphism and liver cirrhosis risk by conducting a meta-analysis. Publications addressing the association between TNF-α -308G>A and liver cirrhosis risk were selected from the Pubmed and Embase databases. Data were extracted from the studies by two independent reviewers; odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated from these data. The meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager Version 5.0.24 and STATA Version 9.2. Eleven studies were retrieved, reporting a total of 1796 liver cirrhosis cases and 2113 healthy controls. A meta-analysis of these 11 studies identified no significant association between TNF-α -308G>A polymorphism and liver cirrhosis risk in all comparisons of G vs A allele; GG vs GA + AA; GG + GA vs AA; GG vs AA; GG vs GA (OR = 1.14, 95%CI = 0.85-1.55, P = 0.38; OR = 1.24, 95%CI = 0.87- 1.77, P = 0.24; OR = 0.90, 95%CI = 0.62-1.30, P = 0.57; OR = 1.03, 95%CI = 0.56-1.89, P = 0.92; OR = 1.30, 95%CI = 0.90-1.88, P = 0.17; respectively). In conclusion, we found no association between TNF-α -308G>A polymorphism and liver cirrhosis risk, both in Caucasian and Asian populations.     

The -607C/A Polymorphisms in Interleukin-18 Gene Promoter Contributes to Cancer Risk: Evidence from A Meta-Analysis of 22 Case-Control Studies

Background

Several observational studies have investigated the association between -607 C/A polymorphism of IL-18 gene and cancer risk; however, the results were inconsistent. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to derive a more precise estimation of the association to help us better understand the relationship between -607 C/A polymorphism of IL-18 gene promoter and risk of cancer.

Methods

A literature search was carried out using PubMed, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database between January 1966 and February 2013. Fixed-effect and random-effect models were used to estimate the pooled odds ratio (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

A total of 22 case-control studies including 4100 cancer cases and 4327 controls contributed to the analysis. Significant association between -607C/A polymorphism in IL-18 gene promoter and cancer risk was observed (CA vs CC:OR =1.221, 95% CI: 1.096, 1.360; P_{heterogeneity}=0.219; AA/CA vs. CC:OR =1.203, 95% CI: 1.057, 1.369; P_{heterogeneity}=0.064). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, -607C/A polymorphism significantly increased risk of cancer among Asian population (AA/CA vs. CC:OR =1.197, 95% CI: 1.023,1.401; P_{heterogeneity}=0.088); however, no significant association was found in Caucasian or African population. The -607C/A polymorphism was associated with a significantly increased risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (CA vs CC:OR =1.330, 95% CI: 1.029,1.719; P_{heterogeneity}=0.704; AA/CA vs. CC:OR =1.323, 95% CI: 1.037,1.687; P_{heterogeneity}=0.823) and esophageal cancer (AA/CA vs. CC:OR =1.289, 95% CI: 1.002,1.658; P_{heterogeneity}=0.700).

Conclusions

The present meta-analysis suggests that the -607C/A polymorphisms in IL-18 gene promoter is associated with a significantly increased risk of cancer, especially for nasopharyngeal carcinoma and esophageal cancer and in Asian population. More studies with larger sample size, well controlled confounding factors are warranted to validate this association.     

Meta-analysis of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and benign prostatic hyperplasia risk

The association between vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms and risk of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has been investigated in numerous publications, but published results remain inconclusive. Hence, we conducted this meta-analysis to derive a more precise conclusion. Four polymorphisms (Taq-I, Bsm-I, Apa-I, and Fok-I) of the VDR gene with risk of BPH from six case–control studies and one cohort study involving 2,248 individuals were identified from PubMed and China National Knowledge Internet databases up to November 20, 2013 (updated on March 5, 2014). After data extraction, the meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. All four VDR polymorphisms were not associated with the risk of BPH [Taq-I: OR 0.61, 95 % CI (0.38–1.24) for tt vs. TT; Bsm-I: OR 1.27, 95 % CI (0.96–1.69) for bb vs. BB; Apa-I: OR 1.26, 95 % CI (0.64–2.46) for aa vs. AA; Fok-I: OR 0.95, 95 % CI (0.60–1.50) for ff vs. FF]. Subgroup analysis according to ethnicity for Taq-I polymorphism also showed that the polymorphism was not associated with risk of BPH for either Caucasians [OR 0.74, 95 % CI (0.31–1.78) for tt vs. TT] or Asians [OR 0.35, 95 % CI (0.11–1.11) for tt vs. TT]. However, results of this meta-analysis should be treated with caution because this meta-analysis has several limitations. We propose to conduct a high-quality study with large sample size to further identify the association between VDR gene polymorphisms and BPH susceptibility.