DNA双链断裂修复与重症联合免疫缺陷

DNA双链断裂(double-strand breaks, DSBs)是细胞DNA损伤的主要类型,它的修复通过同源重组(HR)和非同源末端连接(NHEJ)两种机制实现.NHEJ是人和哺乳动物细胞DSBs修复的重要通路,主要由DNA依赖性蛋白激酶(DNA-PK)、X射线修复交叉互补蛋白4(XRCC4)、DNA连接酶Ⅳ、Artemis、XLF/Cernunnos和其它DNA损伤修复辅助因子组成.本文重点介绍了NHEJ机制主要成分的特性及其功能,以及这些组分的基因发生突变或缺失所引起的DSBs修复缺陷与辐射敏感性重症联合免疫缺陷(radiosensitive severe combined immunodeficiencies, RS-SCIDs).     

聚腺苷二磷酸-核糖聚合酶1与DNA双链断裂修复的相关性

DNA双链断裂(double strand breaks,DSBs)是细胞最严重的DNA损伤形式。细胞通过同源重组(homologous recombination,HR)和非同源末端连接(non-homologous end joining,NHEJ)途径修复DNA双链断裂损伤。聚腺苷二磷酸核糖基化(poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation,PARylation)是蛋白质翻译后修饰过程,这个过程由聚腺苷二磷酸 核糖聚合酶家族(poly(ADP-ribose)polymerases,PARPs)催化完成。PARP1作为PARPs家族最重要的成员,其在DNA损伤应答方面发挥重要作用。研究显示,PARP1在DSBs修复过程中发挥关键作用,参与DSBs的早期应答反应及其具体修复途径,可依据KU蛋白的存在与否发挥不同的特定作用。本文较全面地综述了PARP1在DNA双链断裂修复方面的潜在作用,将为临床疾病的诊治提供新的思路。     

组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂对DNA双链断裂修复路径的作用

DNA双链断裂(double strand breaks, DSBs)对细胞生存是致命的.细胞内非同源末端连接(NHEJ)、重组修复(HDR)、单链退火修复(SSA)和微同源序列末端连接(MMEJ)等通路可竞争性修复DNA双链断裂损伤.在肿瘤细胞DNA中制造难以修复的基因损伤,诱导肿瘤细胞周期中止、坏死和凋亡是临床放、化疗的主要策略.组蛋白去乙酰化酶（histone deacetylase）作为抗肿瘤治疗的新靶标,其抑制剂(histonedeacetylase inhibitors, HDACi)可显著降低肿瘤细胞DSBs修复能力,增强肿瘤细胞的放、化疗敏感性.研究显示,HDACi抑制了肿瘤细胞中具有正确修复倾向的HDR和经典NHEJ通路,具有错误修复倾向的SSA和MMEJ路径也可能牵涉其中.目前,HDACi作用于DSBs修复通路的分子机制已取得较大进展,但仍有许多问题有待阐明.     

与真核生物DSBs修复有关的NHEJ途径研究进展

DNA双链断裂是真核生物最严重的DNA损伤形式.如果断裂的DNA双链无法及时修复,将可能导致细胞死亡.非同源末端连接途径在真核生物DSBs修复中起重要作用.综述了真核生物NHEJ途径中核心蛋白质Ku、DNA-PKcs、DNA连接酶IV、XRCC4、ARTEMIS和XIF等因子的结构和功能,并简要介绍了NHEJ修复途径的分子机制,其中涉及到DSBs位点蛋白复合体组装的两种模型.     

DSBs修复通路的选择及其影响因素

DSBs(DNA双链断裂)是细胞DNA在内外各种因素影响下产生的一种严重损伤,也是包括肿瘤在内的多种疾病发生发展的重要原因之一。为修复该损伤,机体形成了包括同源重组(HR)、非同源末端连接(NHEJ)等在内的多种修复通路;在不同情况下,机体对修复通路的选择受到多种因素的影响。近年来的研究表明,包括细胞类型、末端切除、细胞周期、损伤原因、损伤位置等在内的诸多因素对修复通路的选择均起到了重要的作用。本综述介绍了DSBs修复的常见通路,并对DSBs修复通路的影响因素的最新研究进展进行了综述。     

Ku基因在微生物中的研究进展

ku基因介导的非同源末端连接(NHEJ)途径是DNA双链断裂(DSBs)的一种修复机制,它不依赖于同源重组,且通过与之竞争而削弱同源重组。由于ku基因在生物进化过程中的高度保守性,其功能在很多微生物中已经得到研究,尤其在丝状真菌中,将ku基因敲除,在NHEJ途径缺陷的背景下,同源重组发挥主要作用,基因敲除的频率大为提高,从而方便了对基因功能的研究。     

DNA双链断裂的非同源末端连接修复

细胞内普遍存在的DNA双链断裂(DSB)可通过同源重组(HR)或非同源末端连接(NHEJ)修复。由于HR仅在存在相同染色体作为模板的时候进行,因此,NHEJ通常为主要的修复方式。在NHEJ中,DSB末端首先由Ku识别,接着由核酸酶、聚合酶在Ku与DNA-PKcs协助下加工,并由连接酶IVXRCC4-XLF连接。NHEJ底物类型多样,末端的修复常包含反复加工的过程,导致修复产物通常无法复原损伤前的序列。虽然无法确保准确修复DNA,NHEJ仍对维持基因组的稳定性具有重要的意义。对NHEJ的研究有助于理解癌症的发生机制并将促进癌症的治疗。     

表观遗传调控：基于染色质环境的DNA双链断裂修复

DNA双链断裂（DNA double-strand breaks, DSBs）是威胁基因组完整性和细胞存活的最有害的DNA损伤类型。同源重组（homologous recombination,HR）和非同源末端连接（non-homologous end joining,NHEJ）是修复DNA双链断裂的两种主要途径。DSB修复涉及到损伤部位修复蛋白的募集和染色质结构的改变。在DNA双链断裂诱导下,染色质结构的动态变化在时间和空间上受到严格调控,进而对DNA双链断裂修复过程进行精细调节。特定的染色质修饰形成利于修复的染色质状态,有助于DNA双链断裂修复机器的招募、修复途径的选择和DNA损伤检查点的活化;其中修复途径的选择对于基因组稳定性至关重要。修复不当或失败可导致基因组不稳定性,甚至促进肿瘤的发生。本文综述了染色质结构和染色质修饰的动态变化在DSB修复中的重要作用。此外,文章还总结了在癌症治疗中靶向关键染色质调控因子在基因组稳定性维持、肿瘤发生发展以及潜在临床应用价值等方面的进展。     

DNA双链断裂修复途径的选择与调控

DNA双链断裂(double strand break, DSB)是一种导致基因组不稳定性的高毒性损伤,可引起染色质畸变诱发癌症.真核生物中演化出多条保守的DSB损伤修复途径,其中最重要的修复途径是典型的非同源末端连接(classical non-homologous end joining, cNHEJ)和同源重组(homologous recombination, HR),这两种修复途径解决了细胞中大多数的DSBs.对于不同类型的DSBs,细胞可以审时度势地选择最优的修复途径,以最低的基因组突变风险进行修复.依赖于不断发展的细胞成像技术和分子生物学方法,精细的DSB修复途径选择机制正逐渐展露出来,其调控机制十分复杂而且精密.本文主要阐述了断裂末端结构、DNA末端切除程度、细胞周期、染色质环境、组蛋白修饰和RNA代谢等因素对DSB修复途径的影响,展现了DSB修复途径选择的多样性和灵活性.     

siRNA干扰绵羊胚胎成纤维细胞Lig4基因增加同源重组载体重连修复效率

在动物细胞中,抑制非同源末端连接(Non-homologous end joining, NHEJ)修复途径,可以提高同源重组(Homologous recombination, HR)修复基因组双链断裂(Double-strand brakes, DSBs)的发生概率。为了提高绵羊胚胎成纤维细胞的HR效率,针对NHEJ修复途径中的关键因子Lig4(DNA ligase 4)基因,本文设计合成4个具有靶向性的siRNA(Small interfering RNA)。绵羊胚胎成纤维细胞经电转染导入siRNA,通过实时荧光定量PCR(qRT-PCR)和Western blotting检测,筛选出有效抑制Lig4基因表达的2个siRNA。应用质粒重连法检测HR修复效率,将I-SceⅠ酶线性化的HR质粒和siRNA共转染绵羊胚胎成纤维细胞,经72 h培养及流式细胞仪检测,与对照组细胞比较,结果表明HR质粒重连效率提高了3~4倍。瞬间干扰Lig4基因的表达可提高HR质粒重连效率,为改善绵羊胚胎成纤维细胞基因打靶效率提供理论基础。     

RIF1: A novel regulatory factor for DNA replication and DNA damage response signaling

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are highly toxic to the cells and accumulation of DSBs results in several detrimental effects in various cellular processes which can lead to neurological, immunological and developmental disorders. Failure of the repair of DSBs spurs mutagenesis and is a driver of tumorigenesis, thus underscoring the importance of the accurate repair of DSBs. Two major canonical DSB repair pathways are the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) pathways. 53BP1 and BRCA1 are the key mediator proteins which coordinate with other components of the DNA repair machinery in the NHEJ and HR pathways respectively, and their exclusive recruitment to DNA breaks/ends potentially decides the choice of repair by either NHEJ or HR. Recently, Rap1 interacting factor 1 has been identified as an important component of the DNA repair pathway which acts downstream of the ATM/53BP1 to inhibit the 5′–3′ end resection of broken DNA ends, in-turn facilitating NHEJ repair and inhibiting homology directed repair. Rif1 is conserved from yeast to humans but its function has evolved from telomere length regulation in yeast to the maintenance of genome integrity in mammalian cells. Recently its role in the maintenance of genomic integrity has been expanded to include the regulation of chromatin structure, replication timing and intra-S phase checkpoint. We present a summary of these important findings highlighting the various aspects of Rif1 functions and discuss the key implications for genomic integrity.     

Bacterial DNA repair by non-homologous end joining

The capacity to rectify DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is crucial for the survival of all species. DSBs can be repaired either by homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). The long-standing notion that bacteria rely solely on HR for DSB repair has been overturned by evidence that mycobacteria and other genera have an NHEJ system that depends on a dedicated DNA ligase, LigD, and the DNA-end-binding protein Ku. Recent studies have illuminated the role of NHEJ in protecting the bacterial chromosome against DSBs and other clastogenic stresses. There is also emerging evidence of functional crosstalk between bacterial NHEJ proteins and components of other DNA-repair pathways. Although still a young field, bacterial NHEJ promises to teach us a great deal about the nexus of DNA repair and bacterial pathogenesis.     

Mycobacterial nonhomologous end joining mediates mutagenic repair of chromosomal double-strand DNA breaks

Bacterial nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) is a recently described DNA repair pathway best characterized in mycobacteria. Bacterial NHEJ proteins LigD and Ku have been analyzed biochemically, and their roles in linear plasmid repair in vivo have been verified genetically; yet the contributions of NHEJ to repair of chromosomal DNA damage are unknown. Here we use an extensive set of NHEJ- and homologous recombination (HR)-deficient Mycobacterium smegmatis strains to probe the importance of HR and NHEJ in repairing diverse types of chromosomal DNA damage. An M. smegmatis Delta recA Delta ku double mutant has no apparent growth defect in vitro. Loss of the NHEJ components Ku and LigD had no effect on sensitivity to UV radiation, methyl methanesulfonate, or quinolone antibiotics. NHEJ deficiency had no effect on sensitivity to ionizing radiation in logarithmic- or early-stationary-phase cells but was required for ionizing radiation resistance in late stationary phase in 7H9 but not LB medium. In addition, NHEJ components were required for repair of I-SceI mediated chromosomal double-strand breaks (DSBs), and in the absence of HR, the NHEJ pathway rapidly mutates the chromosomal break site. The molecular outcomes of NHEJ-mediated chromosomal DSB repair involve predominantly single-nucleotide insertions at the break site, similar to previous findings using plasmid substrates. These findings demonstrate that prokaryotic NHEJ is specifically required for DSB repair in late stationary phase and can mediate mutagenic repair of homing endonuclease-generated chromosomal DSBs.     

Factors determining DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice in G2 phase

DNA non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) function to repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in G2 phase with HR preferentially repairing heterochromatin-associated DSBs (HC-DSBs). Here, we examine the regulation of repair pathway usage at two-ended DSBs in G2. We identify the speed of DSB repair as a major component influencing repair pathway usage showing that DNA damage and chromatin complexity are factors influencing DSB repair rate and pathway choice. Loss of NHEJ proteins also slows DSB repair allowing increased resection. However, expression of an autophosphorylation-defective DNA-PKcs mutant, which binds DSBs but precludes the completion of NHEJ, dramatically reduces DSB end resection at all DSBs. In contrast, loss of HR does not impair repair by NHEJ although CtIP-dependent end resection precludes NHEJ usage. We propose that NHEJ initially attempts to repair DSBs and, if rapid rejoining does not ensue, then resection occurs promoting repair by HR. Finally, we identify novel roles for ATM in regulating DSB end resection; an indirect role in promoting KAP-1-dependent chromatin relaxation and a direct role in phosphorylating and activating CtIP.     

Genistein-induced DNA damage is repaired by nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination in TK6 cells

Genistein (GES), a phytoestrogen, has potential chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic effects on cancer. The anticancer mechanism of GES may be related with topoisomerase II associated DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). However, the precise molecular mechanism remains elusive. Here, we performed genetic analyses using human lymphoblastoid TK6 cell lines to investigate whether non-homologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR), the two major repair pathways of DSBs, were involved in repairing GES-induced DNA damage. Our results showed that GES induced DSBs in TK6 cells. Cells lacking Ligase4, an NHEJ enzyme, are hypersensitive to GES. Furthermore, the sensitivity of Ligase4^−/− cells was associated with enhanced DNA damage when comparing the accumulation of γ-H2AX foci and number of chromosomal aberrations (CAs) with WT cells. In addition, cells lacking Rad54, a HR enzyme, also presented hypersensitivity and increased DNA damages in response to GES. Meanwhile, Treatment of GES-lacking enhanced the accumulation of Rad51, an HR factor, in TK6 cells, especially in Ligase4^−/−. These results provided direct evidence that GES induced DSBs in TK6 cells and clarified that both NHEJ and HR were involved in the repair of GES-induced DNA damage, suggesting that GES in combination with inhibition of NHEJ or HR would provide a potential anticancer strategy.     

Emerging models for DNA repair: Dictyostelium discoideum as a model for nonhomologous end-joining

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are a particularly cytotoxic variety of DNA lesion that can be repaired by homologous recombination (HR) or nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ). HR utilises sequences homologous to the damage DNA template to facilitate repair. In contrast, NHEJ does not require homologous sequences for repair but instead functions by directly re-joining DNA ends. These pathways are critical to resolve DSBs generated intentionally during processes such as meiotic and site-specific recombination. However, they are also utilised to resolve potentially pathological DSBs generated by mutagens and errors during DNA replication. The importance of DSB repair is underscored by the findings that defects in these pathways results in chromosome instability that contributes to a variety of disease states including malignancy. The general principles of NHEJ are conserved in eukaryotes. As such, relatively simple model organisms have been instrumental in identifying components of these pathways and providing a mechanistic understanding of repair that has subsequently been applied to vertebrates. However, certain components of the NHEJ pathway are absent or show limited conservation in the most commonly used invertebrate models exploited to study DNA repair. Recently, however, it has become apparent that vertebrate DNA repair pathway components, including those involved in NHEJ, are unusually conserved in the amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Traditionally, this genetically tractable organism has been exploited to study the molecular basis of cell type specification, cell motility and chemotaxis. Here we discuss the use of this organism as an additional model to study DNA repair, with specific reference to NHEJ.     

DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination

The induction of double-strand breaks (DSBs) in DNA by exposure to DNA damaging agents, or as intermediates in normal cellular processes, constitutes a severe threat for the integrity of the genome. If not properly repaired, DSBs may result in chromosomal aberrations, which, in turn, can lead to cell death or to uncontrolled cell growth. To maintain the integrity of the genome, multiple pathways for the repair of DSBs have evolved during evolution: homologous recombination (HR), non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and single-strand annealing (SSA). HR has the potential to lead to accurate repair of DSBs, whereas NHEJ and SSA are essentially mutagenic. In yeast, DSBs are primarily repaired via high-fidelity repair of DSBs mediated by HR, whereas in higher eukaryotes, both HR and NHEJ are important. In this review, we focus on the functional conservation of HR from fungi to mammals and on the role of the individual proteins in this process.     

Changes in DNA double-strand break repair during aging correlate with an increase in genomic mutations

A double -strand break (DSB) is one of the most deleterious forms of DNA damage. In eukaryotic cells, two main repair pathways have evolved to repair DSBs, homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). HR is the predominant pathway of repair in the unicellular eukaryotic organism, S. cerevisiae. However, during replicative aging the relative use of HR and NHEJ shifts in favor of end-joining repair. By monitoring repair events in the HO-DSB system, we find that early in replicative aging there is a decrease in the association of long-range resection factors, Dna2-Sgs1 and Exo1 at the break site and a decrease in DNA resection. Subsequently, as aging progressed, the recovery of Ku70 at DSBs decreased and the break site associated with the nuclear pore complex at the nuclear periphery, which is the location where DSB repair occurs through alternative pathways that are more mutagenic. End-bridging remained intact as HR and NHEJ declined, but eventually it too became disrupted in cells at advanced replicative age. In all, our work provides insight into the molecular changes in DSB repair pathway during replicative aging. HR first declined, resulting in a transient increase in the NHEJ. However, with increased cellular divisions, Ku70 recovery at DSBs and NHEJ subsequently declined. In wild type cells of advanced replicative age, there was a high frequency of repair products with genomic deletions and microhomologies at the break junction, events not observed in young cells which repaired primarily by HR.     

Mechanism of nonhomologous end-joining in mycobacteria: a low-fidelity repair system driven by Ku, ligase D and ligase C

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can be repaired either via homologous recombination (HR) or nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ). Both pathways are operative in eukaryotes, but bacteria had been thought to rely on HR alone. Here we provide direct evidence that mycobacteria have a robust NHEJ pathway that requires Ku and a specialized polyfunctional ATP-dependent DNA ligase (LigD). NHEJ of blunt-end and complementary 5'-overhang DSBs is highly mutagenic ( approximately 50% error rate). Analysis of the recombination junctions ensuing from individual NHEJ events highlighted the participation of several DNA end-remodeling activities, including template-dependent fill-in of 5' overhangs, nontemplated addition of single nucleotides at blunt ends, and nucleolytic resection. LigD itself has the template-dependent and template-independent polymerase functions in vitro that compose the molecular signatures of NHEJ in vivo. Another ATP-dependent DNA ligase (LigC) provides a backup mechanism for LigD-independent error-prone repair of blunt-end DSBs. We speculate that NHEJ allows mycobacteria to evade genotoxic host defense.     

Different roles for nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination following replication arrest in mammalian cells

Homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) play overlapping roles in repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) generated during the S phase of the cell cycle. Here, we characterized the involvement of HR and NHEJ in the rescue of DNA replication forks arrested or slowed by treatment of hamster cells with hydroxyurea or thymidine. We show that the arrest of replication with hydroxyurea generates DNA fragmentation as a consequence of the formation of DSBs at newly replicated DNA. Both HR and NHEJ protected cells from the lethal effects of hydroxyurea, and this agent also increased the frequency of recombination mediated by both homologous and nonhomologous exchanges. Thymidine induced a less stringent arrest of replication and did not generate detectable DSBs. HR alone rescued cells from the lethal effects of thymidine. Furthermore, thymidine increased the frequency of DNA exchange mediated solely by HR in the absence of detectable DSBs. Our data suggest that both NHEJ and HR are involved in repair of arrested replication forks that include a DSB, while HR alone is required for the repair of slowed replication forks in the absence of detectable DSBs.