囊膜病毒膜融合的分子机制

囊膜病毒可能采用相似的病毒-宿主细胞膜融合机制,即病毒表面糖蛋白结合到宿主细胞受体后,启动了病毒融合蛋白的一系列构象变化,根据囊膜蛋白构象变化特征,囊膜病毒可采用两种以上的方式发生膜融合,并据此分为两类：Ⅰ型病毒膜融合和Ⅱ型病毒膜融合.Ⅱ型病毒膜融合以黄病毒为代表,其分子机制与Ⅰ型病毒膜融合不同,但不很清楚.而Ⅰ型病毒膜融合中,如艾滋病毒,流感病毒等,在囊膜蛋白变构形成稳定折叠的发夹三聚体结构时,拉近了两膜之间的距离,此过程释放出来的能量进一步促使两膜融合.膜融合使病毒蛋白及病毒RNA基因组释放到宿主细胞内而感染宿主.以上述研究为基础设计的C肽/N肽小分子抑制子, 可以在病毒糖蛋白中间体构象形成的短时间内,高效、特异地竞争结合其配体,从而阻止糖蛋白的进一步折叠,达到抑制病毒入侵的目的,为病毒疾病的防治提供了新思路和策略.针对艾滋病毒设计的C肽,即T20或Enfuvirtide在临床应用效果很好.以艾滋病毒和流感病毒为例,主要对Ⅰ型病毒膜融合的研究进展进行了讨论.     

病毒跨膜蛋白的结构功能与抗病毒药物设计

根据病毒衣壳表面有无囊膜结构, 病毒可被分为无包膜病毒和有包膜病毒。包膜病毒的膜蛋白在病毒的吸附、侵入、脱壳、生物大分子合成、病毒粒子的装配与释放等生命周期中起重要作用。某些包膜病毒的膜蛋白对病毒侵入宿主细胞的膜融合是不可或缺的。结构分析显示, Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型病毒融合蛋白采用类似的膜融合方式。此外, 流行性感冒病毒的M2 蛋白、人类免疫缺陷病毒Ⅰ型( HIV-1) 的Vpu 蛋白、重症急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒( SARS-CoV) 3a蛋白等膜蛋白还具有离子通道的功能。针对这些病毒膜融合蛋白设计的抑制分子, 将为研发抗包膜病毒新型药物提供新思路和策略。本文以3 种病毒膜融合蛋白为例, 对其融合机制、跨膜蛋白离子通道功能及其在抗病毒药物设计中的应用作一简要综述。     

Ⅱ类囊膜病毒膜融合的分子机制

病毒囊膜与宿主细胞膜的膜融合是囊膜病毒入侵的重要过程,病毒囊膜融合糖蛋白的一系列结构变化引发此过程.综述了Ⅱ类囊膜病毒、弹状病毒及疱疹病毒融合蛋白结构与功能研究的最新进展,介绍了软件分析并定位融合蛋白功能区域的方法.Ⅱ类病毒与Ⅰ类病毒融合蛋白的融合前结构不同,但融合后结构(发夹三聚体结构)相似.弹状病毒与疱疹病毒的融合蛋白集合了Ⅰ/Ⅱ类融合蛋白的某些特征,但其结构变化及融合过程各不相同,被归为新型融合蛋白.上述研究为基础设计的以病毒融合过程为靶标的抑制子,可为抗病毒新药的研制提供新思路.     

疱疹病毒膜融合的分子机制

囊膜病毒与宿主细胞的膜融合是病毒入侵宿主细胞的重要过程,这一过程涉及到病毒囊膜表面糖蛋白与宿主细胞表面受体之间的相互作用和构象变化．疱疹病毒有多个糖蛋白及不同类型的细胞作用受体,相应的受体-糖蛋白复合体构成方式也有多种,其引致的膜融合机制被认为是目前病毒融合机制研究中最复杂的,近年来被广泛研究并取得突破性进展．从病毒糖蛋白与相应受体的结构与功能、受体-糖蛋白复合体的形成与入侵途径,以及膜融合模式几个方面,全面综述疱疹病毒膜融合的分子机制,并展望了未来研究趋势．     

融合蛋白与病毒入膜机制研究进展

包膜病毒感染细胞的第一步即病毒与靶细胞膜的融合,它由病毒包膜上的融合蛋白诱发,融合蛋白与受体分子相互作用后暴露出融合肽,它伸向靶膜使两膜紧密接近后,多肽周围的脂质分子进一步重排,通过中间态最后发生融合,本文将介绍近年来病毒融合蛋白及入膜机制研究进展。     

分子内二硫键对HERV囊膜蛋白融合核心结构的影响

合胞素(Syncytin)是一类由人俘获的逆转录病毒囊膜蛋白,与胎盘的形态发生中细胞滋养层到合胞滋养层的分化过程十分相关。Syncytin与人免疫缺陷病毒I型(HIV-1)囊膜蛋白(Env)在结构上具有相似的特点,二者可能具有相似的膜融合机制。本文通过PCR对融合核心部位七肽重复区HR1和HR2之间linker中自然存在的一对保守的分子内二硫键进行定点突变,表达纯化该突变蛋白,并进行了相应的结构及稳定性探讨,通过与未突变蛋白的性质比较确证该分子内二硫键在蛋白结构的正确形成及稳定性上起着一定的作用。     

分子内二硫键对HERV囊膜蛋白融合核心结构的影响

合胞素(Syncytin)是一类由人俘获的逆转录病毒囊膜蛋白,与胎盘的形态发生中细胞滋养层到合胞滋养层的分化过程十分相关.Syncytin 与人免疫缺陷病毒I型(HIV-1) 囊膜蛋白(Env)在结构上具有相似的特点,二者可能具有相似的膜融合机制.本文通过PCR对融合核心部位七肽重复区HR1和HR2之间linker中自然存在的一对保守的分子内二硫键进行定点突变,表达纯化该突变蛋白,并进行了相应的结构及稳定性探讨,通过与未突变蛋白的性质比较确证该分子内二硫键在蛋白结构的正确形成及稳定性上起着一定的作用.     

小反刍兽疫病毒H和F蛋白在细胞融合中的作用

【目的】研究小反刍兽疫病毒囊膜糖蛋白(血凝素蛋白和融合蛋白)在病毒囊膜和宿主细胞膜融合过程中所发挥的作用。【方法】制备构建成功的小反刍兽疫病毒囊膜糖蛋白和病毒受体SLAM、Nectin4的真核表达质粒pCMV-HA-H、pCAGGS-Flag-F、pCMV-Myc-SLAM和pCMV-Myc-Nectin 4,将其组合转染至CHO-K1细胞,通过显微观察和间接免疫荧光技术分析小反刍兽疫病毒H和F蛋白在病毒融合过程中的功能。【结果】除空白对照组和重组质粒单独转染组细胞中没有发现合胞体外,其余组细胞中均出现了合胞体,而且F和H蛋白共转染组合胞体的数目明显较多;并在共表达H、F蛋白的细胞中观察到了蛋白分布极化的帽子现象。【结论】PPRV F蛋白是病毒囊膜和细胞膜融合的必需蛋白,但需要与PPRV H共同作用才能使病毒成功入侵靶细胞。     

膜融合机制研究进展

膜的融合是一个基本的生命过程,在生物的生长发育中有着重要作用。通过融合,两套独立的双层脂分子合二为一,完成一定的生物功能。膜融合分子机制的关键在于其主要成分：融合蛋白。Ⅰ、Ⅱ类病毒融合蛋白形成“发夹”,胞内囊泡与目标膜各提供的融合蛋白形成“类亮氨酸拉链”,这些结构将独立的膜拉近,继而促使膜合为一体。细胞与细胞间融合蛋白的作用机制目前还未明确,在各种膜融合中,脂双层的变化可能是类似的,但介导融合的分子机制应该是不同的。目前,对于膜融合很多方面的理解还停留在假说阶段。理解了膜融合的过程和分子机制不仅将极大地促进生物学的发展,更重要是将为相关的疾病治疗打下坚实的基础。     

麻疹病毒受体与病毒侵入

麻疹病毒是一种具囊膜的负链RNA病毒,两种主要的囊膜蛋白血凝素蛋白(H)和膜融合蛋白(F)表达在膜表面负责病毒侵入过程中与宿主受体的结合和膜融合过程.病毒囊膜蛋白与受体的相互作用是病毒侵入宿主的关键步骤,决定了病毒感染能力、种属和组织嗜性.因此,囊膜病毒与受体的结合位点往往成为重要的抗病毒药物的靶点.目前已发现的3种麻疹病毒受体包括CD46、SLAM和Nectin-4.以下综述了麻疹病毒受体的特征及在病毒侵入中的作用、麻疹病毒H蛋白与受体的相互作用机制,为抗病毒药物设计及麻疹病毒作为肿瘤治疗性载体的应用提供理论依据.     

Architecture of a nascent viral fusion pore

Enveloped viruses use specialized protein machinery to fuse the viral membrane with that of the host cell during cell invasion. In influenza virus, hundreds of copies of the haemagglutinin (HA) fusion glycoprotein project from the virus surface. Despite intensive study of HA and its fusion activity, the protein's modus operandi in manipulating viral and target membranes to catalyse their fusion is poorly understood. Here, the three‐dimensional architecture of influenza virus–liposome complexes at pH 5.5 was investigated by electron cryo‐tomography. Tomographic reconstructions show that early stages of membrane remodeling take place in a target membrane‐centric manner, progressing from punctate dimples, to the formation of a pinched liposomal funnel that may impinge on the apparently unperturbed viral envelope. The results suggest that the M1 matrix layer serves as an endoskeleton for the virus and a foundation for HA during membrane fusion. Fluorescence spectroscopy monitoring fusion between liposomes and virions shows that leakage of liposome contents takes place more rapidly than lipid mixing at pH 5.5. The relation of ‘leaky’ fusion to the observed prefusion structures is discussed.     

Entry mechanisms of enveloped viruses. Implications for fusion of intracellular membranes

Enveloped viruses infect cells by a mechanism involving membrane fusion. This process is mediated and triggered by specific viral membrane glycoproteins. Evidence is accumulating that fusion of intracellular membranes, as occurs during endocytosis and transport between intracellular organelles, also requires the presence of specific proteins. The relevance of elucidating the mechanisms of virus fusion for a better understanding of fusion of intracellular membranes is discussed.     

Structural basis for membrane fusion by enveloped viruses.

Enveloped viruses such as HIV-1, influenza virus, and Ebola virus express a surface glycoprotein that mediates both cell attachment and fusion of viral and cellular membranes. The membrane fusion process leads to the release of viral proteins and the RNA genome into the host cell, initiating an infectious cycle. This review focuses on the HIV-1 gp41 membrane fusion protein and discusses the structural similarities of viral membrane fusion proteins from diverse families such as Retroviridae (HIV-1), Orthomyxoviridae (influenza virus), and Filoviridae (Ebola virus). Their structural organization suggests that they have all evolved to use a similar strategy to promote fusion of viral and cellular membranes. This observation led to the proposal of a general model for viral membrane fusion, which will be discussed in detail.     

Mechanisms of cell entry by influenza virus

A wide range of viruses, including many human and animal pathogens representing various taxonomic groups, contain genomes that are enclosed in lipid envelopes. These envelopes are generally acquired in the final stages of assembly, as viruses bud from regions of the membrane of the infected cell at which virally encoded membrane proteins have accumulated. The viruses procure their membranes during this process and mature particles 'pinch off' from the cellular membranes. Under most circumstances, initiation of another round of infection is dependent on two critical functions supplied by the envelope proteins. The virus must bind to cell-surface receptors of a new host cell, and fusion of the viral and cellular membranes must occur to transfer the viral genome into the cell. Enveloped viruses have evolved a variety of mechanisms to execute these two basic functions. Owing to their relative simplicity, studies of binding and fusion using enveloped viruses and their components have contributed significantly to the overall understanding of receptor-ligand interactions and membrane fusion processes - fundamental activities involved in a plethora of biological functions.     

Lipids as modulators of membrane fusion mediated by viral fusion proteins

Enveloped viruses infect host cells by fusion of viral and target membranes. This fusion event is triggered by specific glycoproteins in the viral envelope. Fusion glycoproteins belong to either class I, class II or the newly described third class, depending upon their arrangement at the surface of the virion, their tri-dimensional structure and the location within the protein of a short stretch of hydrophobic amino acids called the fusion peptide, which is able to induce the initial lipid destabilization at the onset of fusion. Viral fusion occurs either with the plasma membrane for pH-independent viruses, or with the endosomal membranes for pH-dependent viruses. Although, viral fusion proteins are parted in three classes and the subcellular localization of fusion might vary, these proteins have to act, in common, on lipid assemblies. Lipids contribute to fusion through their physical, mechanical and/or chemical properties. Lipids can thus play a role as chemically defined entities, or through their preferential partitioning into membrane microdomains called "rafts", or by modulating the curvature of the membranes involved in the fusion process. The purpose of this review is to make a state of the art on recent findings on the contribution of cholesterol, sphingolipids and glycolipids in cell entry and membrane fusion of a number of viral families, whose members bear either class I or class II fusion proteins, or fusion proteins of the recently discovered third class.     

Modulation of entry of enveloped viruses by cholesterol and sphingolipids (Review)

Enveloped animal viruses infect host cells by fusion of viral and target membranes. This crucial fusion event occurs either with the plasma membrane of the host cells at the physiological pH or with the endosomal membranes at low pH and is triggered by specific glycoproteins in the virus envelope. Both lipids and proteins play critical and co-operative roles in the fusion process. Interactions of viral proteins with their receptors direct which membranes fuse and viral fusion proteins then drive the process. These fusion proteins operate on lipid assemblies, whose physical and mechanical properties are equally important to the proper functioning of the process. Lipids contribute to the viral fusion process by virtue of their distinct chemical structure, composition and/or their preferred partitioning into specific microdomains in the plasma membrane called 'rafts'. An involvement of lipid rafts in viral entry and membrane fusion has been examined recently. However, the mechanism(s) by which lipids as dynamic raft components control viral envelope-glycoprotein-triggered fusion is not clear. This paper will review literature findings on the contribution of the two raft-associated lipids, cholesterol and sphingolipids in viral entry.     

Modulation of entry of enveloped viruses by cholesterol and sphingolipids (Review)

Enveloped animal viruses infect host cells by fusion of viral and target membranes. This crucial fusion event occurs either with the plasma membrane of the host cells at the physiological pH or with the endosomal membranes at low pH and is triggered by specific glycoproteins in the virus envelope. Both lipids and proteins play critical and co-operative roles in the fusion process. Interactions of viral proteins with their receptors direct which membranes fuse and viral fusion proteins then drive the process. These fusion proteins operate on lipid assemblies, whose physical and mechanical properties are equally important to the proper functioning of the process. Lipids contribute to the viral fusion process by virtue of their distinct chemical structure, composition and/or their preferred partitioning into specific microdomains in the plasma membrane called 'rafts'. An involvement of lipid rafts in viral entry and membrane fusion has been examined recently. However, the mechanism(s) by which lipids as dynamic raft components control viral envelope-glycoprotein-triggered fusion is not clear. This paper will review literature findings on the contribution of the two raft-associated lipids, cholesterol and sphingolipids in viral entry.     

Designed protein mimics of the Ebola virus glycoprotein GP2 α-helical bundle: stability and pH effects

Ebola virus (EboV) belongs to the Filoviridae family of viruses that causes severe and fatal hemhorragic fever. Infection by EboV involves fusion between the virus and host cell membranes mediated by the envelope glycoprotein GP2 of the virus. Similar to the envelope glycoproteins of other viruses, the central feature of the GP2 ectodomain postfusion structure is a six-helix bundle formed by the protein's N- and C-heptad repeat regions (NHR and CHR, respectively). Folding of this six-helix bundle provides the energetic driving force for membrane fusion; in other viruses, designed agents that disrupt formation of the six-helix bundle act as potent fusion inhibitors. To interrogate determinants of EboV GP2-mediated membrane fusion, we designed model proteins that consist of the NHR and CHR segments linked by short protein linkers. Circular dichroism and gel filtration studies indicate that these proteins adopt stable α-helical folds consistent with design. Thermal denaturation indicated that the GP2 six-helix bundle is highly stable at pH 5.3 (melting temperature, T(m) , of 86.8 ± 2.0°C and van't Hoff enthalpy, ΔH(vH) , of -28.2 ± 1.0 kcal/mol) and comparable in stability to other viral membrane fusion six-helix bundles. We found that the stability of our designed α-helical bundle proteins was dependent on buffering conditions with increasing stability at lower pH. Small pH differences (5.3-6.1) had dramatic effects (ΔT(m) = 37°C) suggesting a mechanism for conformational control that is dependent on environmental pH. These results suggest a role for low pH in stabilizing six-helix bundle formation during the process of GP2-mediated viral membrane fusion.     

Probing the interaction between vesicular stomatitis virus and phosphatidylserine

The entry of enveloped animal viruses into their host cells always depends on membrane fusion triggered by conformational changes in viral envelope glycoproteins. Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) infection is mediated by virus spike glycoprotein G, which induces membrane fusion between the viral envelope and the endosomal membrane at the acidic environment of this compartment. In this work, we evaluated VSV interactions with membranes of different phospholipid compositions, at neutral and acidic pH, using atomic force microscopy (AFM) operating in the force spectroscopy mode, isothermal calorimetry (ITC) and molecular dynamics simulation. We found that the binding forces differed dramatically depending on the membrane phospholipid composition, revealing a high specificity of G protein binding to membranes containing phosphatidylserine (PS). In a previous work, we showed that the sequence corresponding amino acid 164 of VSV G protein was as efficient as the virus in catalyzing membrane fusion at pH 6.0. Here, we used this sequence to explore VSV–PS interaction using ITC. We found that peptide binding to membranes was exothermic, suggesting the participation of electrostatic interactions. Peptide–membrane interaction at pH 7.5 was shown to be specific to PS and dependent on the presence of His residues in the fusion peptide. The application of the simplified continuum Gouy–Chapman theory to our system predicted a pH of 5.0 at membrane surface, suggesting that the His residues should be protonated when located close to the membrane. Molecular dynamics simulations suggested that the peptide interacts with the lipid bilayer through its N-terminal residues, especially Val¹⁴⁵ and His¹⁴⁸. Fabiana A.Carneiro and Pedro A. Lapido-Loureiro contributed equally to this work An erratum to this article can be found at     

Fusogenic activity of reconstituted newcastle disease virus envelopes: a role for the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase protein in the fusion process

Enveloped viruses, such as newcastle disease virus (NDV), make their entry into the host cell by membrane fusion. In the case of NDV, the fusion step requires both transmembrane hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) and fusion (F) viral envelope glycoproteins. The HN protein should show fusion promotion activity. To date, the nature of HN-F interactions is a controversial issue. In this work, we aim to clarify the role of the HN glycoprotein in the membrane fusion step. Four types of reconstituted detergent-free NDV envelopes were used, on differing in their envelope protein contents. Fusion of the different virosomes and erythrocyte ghosts was monitored using the octadecyl rhodamine B chloride assay. Only the reconstituted envelopes having the F protein, even in the absence of HN protein, displayed residual fusion activity. Treatment of such virosomes with denaturing agents affecting the F protein abolished fusion, indicating that the fusion detected was viral protein-dependent. Interestingly, the rate of fusion in the reconstituted systems was similar to that of intact viruses in the presence of the inhibitor of HN sialidase activity 2,3-dehydro-2-deoxy-N-acetylneuraminic acid. The results show that the residual fusion activity detected in the reconstituted systems was exclusively due to F protein activity, with no contribution from the fusion promotion activity of HN protein.