四种副溶血弧菌总RNA提取方法的比较

副溶血弧菌(Vibrio parahaemolyticus)是一种革兰氏阴性嗜盐菌.提取高质量的RNA是研究副溶血弧毒力基因表达与其致病性和环境适应性的基础.本研究分别用SDS法、Trizol法,PureLinkTM RNA Mini Kit和Uniq-10柱式Trizol总RNA抽提试剂盒提取六株副溶血弧菌的总RNA,用普通琼脂糖凝胶电泳和核酸测定仪检测RNA的质量,并用RT-PCR法对四种提取方法进行比较.研究结果表明,Trizol法和PureLinkTM RNA Mini Kit简单快捷,提取的总RNA完整性好,纯度高,可用于后续实验的分子生物学研究;而Trizol法更适用于普通实验室细菌RNA的提取.     

肠道菌群核酸提取自动化流程的优化

目的:优化肠道菌群核酸提取自动化流程。方法:收集粪便样本,分别采用手工方法、核酸提取工作站提取核酸,然后利用液体工作站制备PCR反应液进行PCR扩增,最后采用文库工作站建库测序。结果:400μl样品用QIAamp~ Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit试剂盒裂解液裂解后,用MagMAX~(TM) Express 96机器提取核酸的方法与用QIAamp~ Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit试剂盒手工提取核酸的方法相比,测序得到的序列数基本一致,分析结果也没有明显区别;而单独采用MagMAX~(TM)Viral RNA Isolation Kit试剂盒提取核酸由于样品投入体积受限(50μl)、核酸浓度低、测序得到的序列数太少,不能满足后续的分析要求。结论:通过结合使用两种不同的试剂盒,可以实现核酸提取、PCR反应液配制及文库制备的全流程自动化操作,从而大大提高工作效率和结果的稳定性。     

Trizol RNA提取法在雪貂组织的流感病毒H3N2定量PCR检测中优于RNeasy mini kit（Qiagen）柱子法

目的比较RNeasy mini kit（Qiagen）柱子法和Trizol法提取RNA在雪貂肺和肠组织H3N2 SYBRGreen PCR定量中的去干扰作用,从而找到适合该定量体系的RNA提取方法。方法比较Trizol法,RNeasy minikit柱子法,改良RNeasy mini kit柱子法1和改良RNeasy mini kit柱子法2提取肺肠组织RNA的质量,RNA逆转录成cDNA后,利用SYBR Green PCR方法检测样品中H3N2的载量,比较产物的特异性,综合评价RNA提取方法。结果 4种方法提取的肺和肠组织的RNA质量不相同,紫外分光光度仪测得RNeasy mini kit柱子法提取的RNA的A260/280低于1.8,其余3种方法的A 260/280在1.8～2.1之间,A 260/230只有Trizol法能达到2.0左右,其余3种方法均远低于2.0。电泳可见Trizol法提取的RNA有3条带：28 s、18 s和5 s,而RNeasy mini kit柱子法的RNA除了有28 s、18 s外,还有基因组DNA,改良RNeasy mini kit柱子法1和2提取的RNA只有28 s和18 s带。RNA逆转录后进行荧光定量PCR,从溶解曲线看,不论是鼻甲刮取物还是肺肠组织的样品模板,4种方法获得的样品与标准品均为单一峰溶解曲线峰,并且波峰位置重叠。而鼻甲刮取物定量的产物跑琼脂糖凝胶电泳均为单一的特异性条带,而肺肠组织的产物电泳发现：Trizol法获得的模板定量产物与标准品一致,为单一的特异性条带,而其它3种方法获得的模板则均有非特异性条带。结论鼻甲刮取物的病毒定量选用RNeasy mini kit柱子法提取定量结果与Trizol法一样可靠,说明对于简单样品该体系及引物非常适用,结果可信。对于组织样品肺和肠,Trizol法获得的样品定量结果比其它3种方法可靠。     

快速提取肠道微生物基因组DNA的方法

目的:肠道微生物的研究日益成为热点,如何获取高质量、较完整的肠道菌群基因组DNA是肠道微生物研究中的关键。本文通过对酚/氯仿法提取总DNA过程进行考察和优化,建立一种简便酚/氯仿抽提法。方法:考察和优化酚/氯仿法提取总DNA的过程,并根据DNA产量、纯度以及ERIC-PCR及16S rNDA-RFLP所反映的微生物群落结构特性的指标,并与QIAamp?DNA Stool Mini Kit提取的进行比较,评价了所建立的快速提取方法。结果:用简便酚/氯仿法得到基本完整的基因组DNA,ERIC-PCR和16S rDNA-RFLP结果与QIAamp?DNA Stool Mini Kit法基本相同。结论:该方法快速并成本低,适合肠道微生物研究中总DNA提取,尤其适合处理大批量的样品。     

体重差异双胎新生儿 粪便样本DNA提取的优化及分析

摘要：目的 优化新生儿粪便样本DNA提取方法,提取及分析体重差异双胎新生儿粪便样本DNA。方法 从7种DNA提取试剂盒方法中选择对成人粪便样本DNA提取效果最佳的QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit法为基准方法,通过钢珠打断前处理、DNA吸附柱收集全部裂解液上清和洗脱液重复洗脱的优化,建立了用于新生儿粪便样本DNA的提取方法。结果 该优化方法用于婴儿（出生1个月）粪便样本,结果显示DNA提取浓度平均提高了2.4倍。用于48对双胞胎新生儿出生第1天和第3天粪便样本DNA的提取,经酶标仪及PCR扩增检测,结果显示出生第1天粪便样本DNA提取率为32%,出生3天提取率达83%。RT-PCR显示新生儿第1天到第3天肠道微生物量呈现增长趋势。结论 优化的QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit法适用于新生儿粪便样本DNA的快速提取,为后续扩增子高通量测序和研究体重差异双胎新生儿肠道菌群构成规律奠定基础。     

沼气池污泥微生物总DNA提取方法的比较

沼气发酵系统是一个复杂的生态系统,其污泥微生物超过99%是不可培养的。为了优化沼气池纤维素的转化效率、沼气的产率和开展污泥微生物多样性研究,本研究采用化学裂解法、溶菌酶裂解法和QIAampDNA Stool Mini Kit提取了沼气池污泥样品中微生物的总DNA,对三种方法的DNA得率、纯度、大片段提取效果以及是否含有PCR反应抑制剂进行了研究,最后对16S rRNA基因V3区的扩增产物进行了PCR变性梯度凝胶电泳(PCR-DGGE)分析。与化学裂解法和QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit法相比,溶菌酶裂解法得到的DNA量大、片段长、片段分布广、PCR扩增效率高;同时PCR-DGGE图谱显示,溶菌酶裂解法可更好地展示沼气池污泥中微生物的多样性。该结果为进一步提高沼气池中纤维素的转化效率和沼气生产优势菌种的质和量打下了一定的前期基础。     

上海地区小鼠诺瓦克病毒的检测分析及病毒分离

目的了解上海地区实验小鼠自然感染小鼠诺瓦克病毒(murine norovirus,MNV)的状况,并分离毒株。方法抽取委托检测单位送检的SPF小鼠319只,分别采集盲肠内容物及血液样本,应用逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)方法扩增小鼠盲肠内容物样本中MNV的特异性基因片段来检测MNV的感染情况,同时采用酶联免疫吸附试验(enzyme linked immunosorbent assay,ELISA)与核酸检测方法进行对比。将RT-PCR扩增结果为阳性的盲肠内容物样本稀释并经0.22μm滤膜过滤,接种到小鼠巨噬细胞系RAW 264.7细胞,盲传后采用RT-PCR方法鉴定。结果 RT-PCR检测的319份小鼠盲肠内容物样本中,阳性样本95份,阳性率为29.78%。对180份经RTPCR检测的小鼠血清进行ELISA检测,阳性样本70份,阳性率为38.89%。RAW 264.7细胞盲传5代后在72 h内出现细胞病变,经RT-PCR鉴定,显示187 bp的目的条带。结论通过核酸检测方法和血清学方法证实上海地区实验小鼠存在MNV自然感染,且感染率较高,应加强实验小鼠的饲养管理。     

文心兰RNA不同提取方法比较

目的:为了得到高效的文心兰RNA提取方法和高质量的RNA,为后续文心兰分子生物学研究奠定基础.方法:选取文心兰“黄金2号”(Oncidium Gower Ramsey‘Gold2’)叶片和根组织为材料,对SDS-LiCl法、改良CTAB-NaAC法和改良CTAB-LiCl法和总RNA提取效果进行了比较研究.结果:改良CTAB-LiCl法得到的RNA样品纯度较高,完整性好,经电泳检测条带清晰无明显降解,28S条带的亮度是18S条带亮度的2倍,从叶片和气生根组织中提取RNA的OD260/OD280比值分别为1.797和1.787,提取率分别为33.07μg/g、29.07μg/g.以此RNA为模板进行RT-PCR反应,能获得特异条带.结论:改良CTAB-LiCl法是一种高效的文心兰RNA提取方法,所得样品RNA适合进一步的分子生物学研究.     

富含RNA酶大鼠腺体组织总RNA提取方法改良

为了改良传统提取富含RNA酶大鼠胰腺和腮腺组织总RNA方法,本研究将组织样本分成对照组,0.5％,1.0％和2.0％β-巯基乙醇处理组,对照组采用Trizol法提取总RNA,β-巯基乙醇处理组分别于Trizol试剂中加入0.5％,1％,2％β-巯基乙醇.测定不同处理组单链核酸含量、完整性,A260/280和A260/230;采用实时荧光定量PCR检测管家基因β-actin,GAPDH,胰腺淀粉酶AMY2和腮腺水通道蛋白AQP-5表达情况,并通过计算扩增效率,验证β-巯基乙醇是否对后续PCR实验有影响.结果表明,不同处理组单链核酸含量、A260/280,A260/230无显著差异,β-巯基乙醇组RNA完整性显著高于对照组,1.0％,2.0％β-巯基乙醇组RNA完整性显著高于0.5％β-巯基乙醇组,1.0％β-巯基乙醇组RNA完整性与2.0％β-巯基乙醇组无显著差异;添加1.0％β-巯基乙醇对后续PCR试验无影响.综上所述,在传统Trizol法内添加β-巯基乙醇可显著提高胰腺和腮腺组织总RNA提取质量,其中添加1.0％β-巯基乙醇是最佳提取方案.     

富含RNA酶大鼠腺体组织总RNA提取方法改良

为了改良传统提取富含RNA酶大鼠胰腺和腮腺组织总RNA方法,本研究将组织样本分成对照组,0.5％,1.0％和2.0％β-巯基乙醇处理组,对照组采用Trizol法提取总RNA,β-巯基乙醇处理组分别于Trizol试剂中加入0.5％,1％,2％β-巯基乙醇.测定不同处理组单链核酸含量、完整性,A260/280和A260/230;采用实时荧光定量PCR检测管家基因β-actin,GAPDH,胰腺淀粉酶AMY2和腮腺水通道蛋白AQP-5表达情况,并通过计算扩增效率,验证β-巯基乙醇是否对后续PCR实验有影响.结果表明,不同处理组单链核酸含量、A260/280,A260/230无显著差异,β-巯基乙醇组RNA完整性显著高于对照组,1.0％,2.0％β-巯基乙醇组RNA完整性显著高于0.5％β-巯基乙醇组,1.0％β-巯基乙醇组RNA完整性与2.0％β-巯基乙醇组无显著差异;添加1.0％β-巯基乙醇对后续PCR试验无影响.综上所述,在传统Trizol法内添加β-巯基乙醇可显著提高胰腺和腮腺组织总RNA提取质量,其中添加1.0％β-巯基乙醇是最佳提取方案.     

Giardia intestinalis: DNA extraction approaches to improve PCR results

Difficulty in disrupting cysts of Giardia intestinalis, a cosmopolitan protozoan parasite, decreases the yield of DNA extracted and reduces the effectiveness of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). To improve the detection of the Giardia Glutamate Dehydrogenase (gdh) gene, we re-evaluated the effects of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction methods. Purified and concentrated cysts from 33 fecal samples were disrupted using conventional methods, and DNA extraction was conducted using two protocols: the QIAamp Stool Mini Kit and phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (PCI). PCR amplification was successful for 12 extracted DNA samples (36%) using PCI following a glass bead and freeze/thaw pretreatment and for all 33 samples (100%) using the QIAamp Stool Mini Kit following the aforementioned pretreatment. Consequently, the pretreatment of cysts with glass beads and freeze/thaw cycles followed by extraction of DNA with the QIAamp Stool Mini kit was the more effective protocol.     

Evaluation of QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit for ecological studies of gut microbiota

Cell lysis efficiency and the quality of DNA extracts from complex bacterial ecosystems are two major concerns in molecular ecological studies of gut microbiota. In this study, we use PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) DNA profiling, random cloning and sequence analysis of 16S rRNA genes to compare the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit with the bead beating technique in the preparation of DNA extracts from gut microbiota of pigs. We also developed a washing procedure that can release more than 93% of bacterial cells attached to the gut mucosa. Both the QIAamp kit and bead beating method lysed approximately 95% of bacterial cells. PCR-DGGE DNA profiles of ileal and cecal microbiota from both digesta and mucosa that were generated from the DNA extracts using the two methods were nearly identical. Random cloning and sequence analysis also demonstrated the high quality of DNA extracts using the two methods. Two random clone sets of 16S rRNA genes generated from the DNA extracts had a similar degree of bacterial diversity. Different preparations of DNA extract from a single sample using the QIAamp kit consistently produced similar PCR-DGGE DNA profiles with similarity indexes higher than 99%. Our data suggest the appropriateness of the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit for the studies of gut microbial ecology and the effectiveness of the QIAamp kit in processing multiple samples for cell lysis and DNA extraction.     

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for human gut microbial community profiling

The human gut harbors a vast range of microbes that have significant impact on health and disease. Therefore, gut microbiome profiling holds promise for use in early diagnosis and precision medicine development. Accurate profiling of the highly complex gut microbiome requires DNA extraction methods that provide sufficient coverage of the original community as well as adequate quality and quantity. We tested nine different DNA extraction methods using three commercial kits (TianLong Stool DNA/RNA Extraction Kit (TS), QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (QS), and QIAamp PowerFecal DNA Kit (QP)) with or without additional bead-beating step using manual or automated methods and compared them in terms of DNA extraction ability from human fecal sample. All methods produced DNA in sufficient concentration and quality for use in sequencing, and the samples were clustered according to the DNA extraction method. Inclusion of bead-beating step especially resulted in higher degrees of microbial diversity and had the greatest effect on gut microbiome composition. Among the samples subjected to bead-beating method, TS kit samples were more similar to QP kit samples than QS kit samples. Our results emphasize the importance of mechanical disruption step for a more comprehensive profiling of the human gut microbiome.     

Comparison of five commercial DNA extraction kits for the recovery of Yersinia pestis DNA from bacterial suspensions and spiked environmental samples

Aim:  To evaluate commercial DNA extraction kits for their ability to isolate DNA from Yersinia pestis suspensions and spiked environmental samples.
Methods and Results:  Five commercially available DNA extraction kits were evaluated: the ChargeSwitch gDNA Mini Bacteria Kit, the IT 1-2-3 Sample DNA Purification Kit, the MasterPure Complete DNA and RNA Purification Kit, the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit and the UltraClean Microbial DNA Isolation Kit. The extraction methods were performed upon six Y. pestis strains and spiked environmental specimens, including three swab types and one powder type. Taqman real-time PCR analysis revealed that the use of the MasterPure kit resulted in DNA with the most consistently positive results and the lowest limit of detection from Y. pestis suspensions and spiked environmental samples.
Conclusion:  Comparative evaluations of the five commercial DNA extraction methods indicated that the MasterPure kit was superior for the isolation of PCR-amplifiable DNA from Y. pestis suspensions and spiked environmental samples.
Significance and Impact of the Study:  The results of this study can assist diagnostic laboratories with selecting the best extraction method for processing environmental specimens for subsequent detection of Y. pestis by real-time PCR.     

Comparison of DNA Extraction Kits for Detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei in Spiked Human Whole Blood Using Real-Time PCR

Burkholderia pseudomallei, the etiologic agent of melioidosis, is endemic in northern Australia and Southeast Asia and can cause severe septicemia that may lead to death in 20% to 50% of cases. Rapid detection of B. pseudomallei infection is crucial for timely treatment of septic patients. This study evaluated seven commercially available DNA extraction kits to determine the relative recovery of B. pseudomallei DNA from spiked EDTA-containing human whole blood. The evaluation included three manual kits: the QIAamp DNA Mini kit, the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini kit, and the High Pure PCR Template Preparation kit; and four automated systems: the MagNAPure LC using the DNA Isolation Kit I, the MagNAPure Compact using the Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit I, and the QIAcube using the QIAamp DNA Mini kit and the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini kit. Detection of B. pseudomallei DNA extracted by each kit was performed using the B. pseudomallei specific type III secretion real-time PCR (TTS1) assay. Crossing threshold (C_T) values were used to compare the limit of detection and reproducibility of each kit. This study also compared the DNA concentrations and DNA purity yielded for each kit. The following kits consistently yielded DNA that produced a detectable signal from blood spiked with 5.5×10⁴ colony forming units per mL: the High Pure PCR Template Preparation, QIAamp DNA Mini, MagNA Pure Compact, and the QIAcube running the QIAamp DNA Mini and QIAamp DNA Blood Mini kits. The High Pure PCR Template Preparation kit yielded the lowest limit of detection with spiked blood, but when this kit was used with blood from patients with confirmed cases of melioidosis, the bacteria was not reliably detected indicating blood may not be an optimal specimen.     

Evaluation of three methods for effective extraction of DNA from human hair

In this paper we evaluate three different methods for extracting DNA from human hair i.e. the Chelex method, the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit method and the ISOHAIR method. Analysis of DNA prepared from dyed hairs with the ISOHAIR method suggested that the DNA extracts contained PCR inhibitors. On the other hand, few inhibition was observed when DNA from dyed hairs were extracted using the Chelex method and the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit method. In conclusion, the Chelex method is recommended for PCR experiments in view of its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. To assess the reliability of the Chelex method for the extraction of genomic DNA from both natural and dyed hair samples, minisatellite variant repeat (MVR)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) patterns of Chelex-extracted DNA were compared using hairs (three natural black hairs and three dyed hairs) with buccal swabs from six individuals. Complete agreement was observed between hair and swab samples in each individual, proving the utility of the Chelex method.     

Evaluation of five commercial nucleic acid extraction kits for their ability to inactivate Bacillus anthracis spores and comparison of DNA yields from spores and spiked environmental samples

This study evaluated five commercial extraction kits for their ability to recover DNA from Bacillus anthracis spores and spiked environmental samples. The kits evaluated represent the major types of methodologies which are commercially available for DNA or total nucleic acid extraction, and included the ChargeSwitch gDNA Mini Bacteria Kit, NucliSens Isolation Kit, Puregene Genomic DNA Purification Kit, QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit, and the UltraClean Microbial DNA Isolation Kit. Extraction methods were performed using the spores of eight virulent strains of B. anthracis. Viability testing of nucleic acid extracts showed that the UltraClean kit was the most efficient at depleting samples of live B. anthracis spores. TaqMan real-time PCR analysis revealed that the NucliSens, QIAamp and UltraClean kits yielded the best level of detection from spore suspensions. Comparisons of processed samples from spiked swabs and three powder types indicated that DNA extraction using the UltraClean kit resulted in the most consistently positive results and the lowest limit of detection. This study demonstrated that different nucleic extraction methodologies, represented here by various commercial extraction kits, differ in their ability to inactivate live B. anthracis spores as well as DNA yield and purity. In addition, the extraction method used can influence the sensitivity of real-time PCR assays for B. anthracis.     

狗獾粪便DNA提取方法的初步探讨

在京杭大运河扬州段堤坝上采集狗獾的新鲜粪便,采用预处理-酚/氯仿抽提法、NaCl改良法、异硫氰酸胍裂解法、淀粉吸附法及QIAamp试剂盒法5种方法对粪便样品中狗獾DNA进行提取,探讨狗獾粪便样品中DNA提取方法和优化条件。结果表明,在5种提取方法中,淀粉吸附法的效果明显优于其它4种方法。采用粪便裂解液快速裂解细胞后,加入淀粉去除其中的大量PCR抑制物,然后用蛋白酶K裂解、酚/氯仿/异戊醇抽提,最后使用UNIQ-10柱纯化粪便DNA,对线粒体控制区和微卫星位点的PCR扩增反应及测序结果证实该方法的可行性。以上结果表明,通过该方法获得的粪便DNA能够用于更深入的分子遗传学等学科的研究。