Results of point stenting of extended coronary stenosis in patients with ischemic heart disease

The paper analyzes the immediate and long-term results of point stenting in patients with extended (more than 30 mm) coronary stenoses and compares them with those obtained by routine stenting. The study included 177 patients with varying extent stenoses who underwent traditional implantation of intracoronary stents. Thirty-seven patients undergone the so-called point stenting formed a separate group. There was no significant difference in clinical and angiographic success rates between the patients of all three groups. Significant difference was also absent in subacute stent thrombosis between the patients of Groups 2 and 3 and those of the point stenting group. Thus, acute or subacute stent thrombosis was noted in 4 (2.3%) patients from the routine stenting groups, all the patients being from Groups 2 and 3, and in 2 (5.4%) from the point stenting group. No significant difference was found in the incidence of recurrent angina pectoris (restenosis) between Groups 1 and 2 and between Groups 2 and 3. At the same time, recurrent angina (restenosis) significantly more frequently developed in the patients of Group 3 than those of Group 1. As compared with Groups 2 and 3 patients, there was no significant difference in the incidence of recurrent angina (restenosis).     

Results of point stenting of extended coronary stenoses in patients with ischemic heart disease

The paper analyzes the immediate and long-term results of point stenting in patients with extended (more than 30 mm) coronary stenoses and compares them with those obtained by routine stenting. The study included 177 patients with varying extent stenoses who underwent traditional implantation of intracoronary stents. Thirty-seven patients undergone the so-called point stenting formed a separate group. There was no significant difference in clinical and angiographic success rates between the patients of all three groups. Significant difference was also absent in subacute stent thrombosis between the patients of Groups 2 and 3 and those of the point stenting group. Thus, acute or subacute stent thrombosis was noted in 4 (2.3%) patients from the routine stenting groups, all the patients being from Groups 2 and 3, and in 2 (5.4%) from the point stenting group. No significant difference was found in the incidence of recurrent angina pectoris (restenosis) between Groups 1 and 2 and between Groups 2 and 3. At the same time, recurrent angina (restenosis) significantly more frequently developed in the patients of Group 3 than those of Group 1. As compared with Groups 2 and 3 patients, there was no significant difference in the incidence of recurrent angina (restenosis).     

Immediate and long-term results of coronary stent implantation without predilatation (direct stenting) in patients with coronary heart disease

The paper assesses the immediate and long-term results of direct stenting (without the stage of predilation) and compares with the outcomes of conventional stent implantation. A prospective study included 183 patients. All the patients were divided into two groups according to the procedure of stent implantation. In 85 (46.7%) patients, the stent was implanted without preliminary predilation of stenosis (direct stenting). These patients formed Group 1. Group 2 comprised 97 (53.3%) patients in whom the stent was placed by using the routine procedure. All the patients enrolled into the study had types A, B1, and B2 stenoses according to the ACC/AHA classification and received the conventional antiaggregatory and anticoagulant therapy. The technical success of direct stenting was 97.7%. There were no cases of stent dislocation and loss during direct stenting or expansion of a balloon and stent. Analyzing the immediate results in all the patients of the both groups showed a positive angiographic success. Thus, a primary angiographic and clinical success of direct stenting was achieved in all (100%) patients. Recurrent angina pectoris with restenosis was observed in 8 (9.4%) patients in Group 1 and in 21 (21.6%) in Group 2 (p < 0.05). Direct stenting significantly differs from the routine stent implantation in all procedure parameters. Thus, direct stenting in patients with uncomplicated stenoses is a safe and feasible procedure.     

Clinical outcomes of long coronary stents: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery stenting is particularly useful during percutaneous coronary intervention for long lesions previously associated with a low procedural success rate and a high complication rate of dissection and occlusion. Current treatment options include implantation of a single long stent, multiple contiguous stents, or 'spot' stenting. However, multiple stent implantation may result in sections of overlapping stent or gaps of unstented segments and is an independent predictor of restenosis. The early and intermediate clinical outcome of single and multiple long stent (>/= 30 mm) implantation is not established. METHODS AND RESULTS: The authors retrospectively identified 123 consecutive patients who had undergone stenting using one or more long coronary stents. Baseline clinical data, procedural outcomes and completed clinical follow-up to 52 weeks were obtained by case-note review. The majority (69%) required intervention for stable coronary disease. Seventy-seven per cent of lesions were either type B2 or C and only 2% were in saphenous vein grafts. The procedural success rate was 94%. A total of 15 major events occurred in 13 patients (11%). Ten acute events occurred and five events were during the follow-up period from 30 days to 52 weeks. Two patients died, one from uncontrolled bleeding secondary to the use of antithrombotic agents and one at four weeks due to sudden death. One patient had a postprocedural infarct. Two patients required in-hospital repeat revascularization for acute vessel closure and eight required revascularization during follow-up (three cases of occlusion/thrombosis and five cases of restenosis). CONCLUSIONS: The use of long coronary stents (>/= 30 mm) for the treatment of long diffuse native vessel disease, saphenous vein graft disease and long coronary dissections is associated with a reasonable procedural success rate and acceptable early and intermediate-term clinical outcomes.     

中性粒细胞／淋巴细胞比值与药物支架内再狭窄关系

目的：探讨经皮冠状动脉支架植入术前中性粒细胞／淋巴细胞比值（Neutrophil-to-LymphocyteRatio,NLR）与患者药物支架（DrugElutingStent,DES）植入后发生支架内再狭窄（In—StentRestenosis,ISR）的关系。方法：回顾性分析2012年01月至2012年10月间有DES植入史并再次入院接受冠脉造影的92例患者（平均年龄65．22±9．73岁）的血液学检查、既往冠脉造影结果及再次冠脉造影结果。根据DES植入前的NLR的四分位点将所有入选患者分为3组：最低三分位组（n=31,0．91-1．83）,中间三分位（n=30,1．87—2．63）,最高三分位（n=31,2．66—4．67）,比较3组间ISR发生率有无差异。结果：再狭窄发生在最低NLR三分位的有3例（9．68％）,发生在中间NLR三分位组的有2例（6．67％）,而有4例（12．90％）发生在NLR最高三分位组（P=0．714）,3组之间的差异无统计学意义。结论：因稳定或不稳定型心绞痛而植入药物支架的患者,其术前NLR同支架术后ISR的发生无明显相关性。NLR不能作为DES植入后发生再狭窄的预测指标。     

Clinical and angiographic results with the beStent: the Registry for Optimal beStent Evaluation (ROSE) trial

BACKGROUND: Although safety and efficacy of the beStent (Medtronic Inc., Santa Rosa, CA, USA) have been described, the long-term angiographic and clinical outcomes have yet to be investigated. The ROSE (Registry for Optimal beStent Evaluation) trial was designed to assess the procedural safety of single 15 mm beStent implantation, and the six-month angiographic and 12-month clinical outcomes of patients treated with this novel coronary stent. METHODS: Patients with angina and a single de novo lesion in a native coronary artery of >/=2.75 mm diameter were included in this multicenter, prospective, observational trial. Clinical follow-up was obtained at one, six and 12 months. Angiography was performed before and after the stent implantation and at six months. The primary end-point included major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization), major bleeding complications, and thrombotic occlusions at one-month follow-up. Secondary end-points were major cardiac-event-free survival at six- and 12-month follow-up and angiographic restenosis at six months. A total of 120 patients (80% male, mean age 58.6 +/- 10.6 years) with stable (48%) or unstable (44%) angina pectoris were allocated. The target vessel reference diameter pre-procedure was 2.85 +/- 0.52 mm. RESULTS: Minimal lumen diameter pre/post and at follow-up was 0.97 +/- 0.28 mm, 2.53 +/- 0.40 mm and 1.86 +/- 0.63 mm, respectively. Restenosis rate according to the >50% diameter stenosis criterion at six-month follow-up was 21.5%. At 12 months, the event-free survival rate was 75% (no deaths, two Q-wave and seven non-Q-wave infarctions, five bypass surgery interventions and 16 target lesion revascularizations), whilst 87% of the patients were free of angina pectoris. CONCLUSION: Despite the relatively high percentage of small vessels, the outcome of the ROSE trial is comparable to those observed in previous stent trials, indicating that the coronary beStent is safe and effective as a primary device for the treatment of native coronary artery lesions in patients with (un)stable angina pectoris.     

Stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction using a heparin-coated stent: a pilot study as a preamble to a randomized trial comparing balloon angioplasty and stenting

Preliminary experience with primary stenting in myocardial infarction has suggested a greater benefit in clinical outcome than has been obtained with direct balloon angioplasty. However, subacute thrombosis (SAT) remains a limitation for this new mode of therapy. In the BENESTENT II Pilot and main trials, the incidence of SAT with the heparin-coated Palmaz-Schatz stent was only 0.15%. Therefore, as a preamble to a large randomized trial, the feasibility and safety of the use of the Heparin-Coated Palmaz-Schatz trade mark Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) was tested in 101 patients enrolled between April and September 1996 in 18 clinical centres. In 101 stent-eligible AMI patients, as dictated by protocol, a heparin-coated stent was implanted. The primary objectives were to determine the in-hospital incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, MI, target lesion revascularization) and bleeding complications, while the secondary objectives were the procedural success rate and the MACE, the restenosis and reocclusion rates at 6.5 months. Stent implantation (n 3 129 stents) was successful in 97 patients of the 101 who were included in this trial. During their hospital stay, two patients died and no patient experienced re-infarction, ischaemia prompting re-PTCA or CABG. Four patients suffered a bleeding complication, three major and one minor, of whom three required surgical repair. At 210 days follow-up, 81% of the patients were event free. At 6.5 months restenosis was documented in 18% of the 88 patients who underwent follow-up angiography, including three total occlusions. The results, both with respect to QCA and the occurrence of MACE, compare favourably with studies using elective stenting in both stable and unstable angina patients. As a result of this pilot study, a large randomized trial comparing direct balloon angioplasty with direct stenting in 900 patients with AMI was initiated in December 1996.     

Clinical and quantitative angiographic outcomes following elective implantation of the self-expanding Wallstent for longer coronary artery lesions--final results of the Wellstent native study

BACKGROUND: Implantation of short balloon-expandable stents provides superior clinical and angiographic outcome compared with balloon angioplasty in selected patients. The purpose of the Wellstent study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the self-expanding Wallstent combined with aspirin and ticlopidine in patients with stable or unstable angina related to a native coronary lesion up to 45 mm in length. METHODS: 105 patients (111 lesions) with stable (57%) or unstable (43%) angina were included in this prospective multicentre evaluation. Angiography before and after Wallstent implantation and at 6-month follow-up was analysed at the core lab using the CAAS 2 system. The primary end-point was incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days. Secondary end-points were angiographic outcome at 6 months and MACE at 6 months and 1 year. RESULTS: Acute procedural success (successful stent implantation with residual stenosis <20%) was achieved in 99%. Mean reference diameter was 3.18 +/- 0.66 mm, minimal luminal diameter was 1.00 +/- 0.50 mm pre- and 2.84 +/- 0.47 mm poststent (diameter stenosis 16 +/- 6%). The mean hospital stay was 2.2 days. At 30 days, 95% of patients were free of MACE. At 6 month and 1 year clinical follow-up, 75% and 71% of patients, respectively, remained free of MACE, the majority of which (19 of 30) were re-interventions at re-angiography. In 90% of eligible patients, MLD at follow-up was 1.65 +/- 0.75 mm (late loss 1.20 +/- 0.66 mm, loss index 0.66), diameter stenosis 42 +/- 15%, with a restenosis rate of 32%. Longer stents were associated with greater luminal loss (P = 0.001) and less-favourable clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Wallstent implantation, combined with aspirin and ticlopidine, achieved excellent acute and 30 day clinical results in a heterogenous high-risk patient group. Clinical outcome at 6 months and 1 year remained good, and most adverse events were re-PTCA during follow-up angiography. The loss index of 0.66 and restenosis rate of 32%, related in part to the use of longer stents, emphasizes the continuing need for effective anti-proliferative therapy.     

The role of acute wall recoil and late restenosis: results of the OCBAS trial (Optimal Coronary Balloon Angioplasty with Provisional Stenting versus Primary Stent)

Early deterioration of minimal luminal diameter immediately after PTCA, has been associated with an increase of late restenosis. Lesions with no early loss after PTCA have a low restenosis rate. Coronary stents reduce restenosis in lesions exhibiting early wall recoil. The purpose of the OCBAS study was to compare two strategies during coronary interventions; provision vs. elective stenting. 116 patients with good PTCA results were randomized to stent (n = 57) or to optimal PTCA (n = 59). After randomization in PTCA group, 13.5% of the patients crossed over to stent due to early loss (provisional stenting). Baseline demographic and angiographic characteristics were similar in both groups of patients. At 7.6 months, 96.6% of the entire population had a follow-up angiographic study; 98.2% in the stent and 94.9% in the PTCA group. Immediate and follow-up angiographic data showed that acute gain was significantly higher in the stent than in the PTCA group (1.95 vs. 1.5 mm; P < 0.03). However, late loss was significantly higher in the stent than the PTCA groups (0.63 +/- 0.59 vs. 0.26 +/- 0.44, respectively; P = 0.01). Hence, net gain with both techniques was similar (1.32 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.24 +/- 0.29 mm for the stent and PTCA groups respectively; P = NS). Angiographic restenosis rate at follow-up (19.2% in stent vs. 16.4% in PTCA; P = NS) and TVR (17.5 in stent vs. 13.5% in PTCA; P = NS) were also similar. Furthermore, event-free survival was 80.8% in the stent versus 83.1% in the PTCA group (P = NS). Overall costs (hospital and follow-up) were US$591,740 in the stent versus US$398,480 in the PTCA group (P < 0.02). The strategy of the PTCA with delay angiogram and provisional stent if early loss occurs, had similar restenosis rate and TVR than universal use of bare stents.     

Use of Rtrade mark stent in the percutaneous coronary intervention of coronary bifurcation lesions

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) of coronary bifurcation lesion is technically quite demanding. It has been associated with a lower procedural success, higher rates of complication and restenosis. Side-branch occlusion and plaque shifting or 'snow plow' effect are not uncommon. Stenting of the main vessel may cause 'stent jail' of the side-branch. Modern stent design may allow passage of a balloon or stent into the side-branch through the struts of the stent placed in the main vessel. A newly developed 316 stainless steel tubular stent, the Rtrade mark stent is uniquely designed to provide flexibility, radial strength on deployment and conformability. Its large cell size facilitates PCI of bifurcation lesion. AIM: To assess the feasibility of R(trade mark) stent in the treatment of symptomatic patients with bifurcation coronary lesions. The main objective was to assess the ease of deployment, side-branch access and overall success of the R(trade mark) stent in this group of patients without any major adverse events. METHODS: Between December 1998 and September 2000 the R(trade mark) stent was used as a main stent in 28 consecutive patients with coronary bifurcation lesions, 46% of which had unstable angina. The mean age was 59 +/- 10 and 89% were male. Adjunctive medical therapy included clopidrogel, aspirin and intraprocedure heparin. Abciximab (ReoPro) was given to 9 patients. RESULTS: Successful stent deployment was achieved in all patients. Thirty-four R Stents and 16 other stents were used. Two patients had post-procedure rise in cardiac enzymes. There were no major adverse events at 30 days. LAD/D1 with LAD/diagonal was the target lesion in the majority of patients. Stenting of the side-branch was done in 18 and balloon dilatation in 9 patients. At 3-23 months (mean 11.8) follow-up, repeat angiography was done in 18 patients with restenosis in 4, two of them had repeat PCI and one had coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). CONCLUSION: Coronary bifurcation lesions are not uncommon. Current advances in stent technology offer a safe and effective revascularisation strategy for such complex lesions. The R(trade mark) stent appears to be a suitable device that provides good wall coverage, radial strength, conformability and easy side-branch access.     

Multicenter evaluation of the phosphorylcholine-coated biodivYsio stent in short de novo coronary lesions: The SOPHOS study

AIMS: The BiodivYsio trade mark stent (Biocompatibles Ltd, Farnham, UK) is coated with a phosphorylcholine (PC)-containing copolymer to confer biocompatibility. The SOPHOS (Study Of PHosphorylcholine coating On Stents) study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of this novel coronary stent and by indirect comparison to indicate equivalence with other formal stent studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with angina and a single short (#x2A7F;12 mm) de novo lesion in a native coronary artery of >/=2.75 mm diameter were included. A total of 425 patients were allocated in 24 centers. Clinical data were collected at one-, six- and nine-month follow-up. Angiography was performed before and after the stent implantation. In addition, in the first 200 patients (SOPHOS A) angiography was routinely performed at six months. The following 225 patients (SOPHOS B) were merely followed up clinically. The primary end-point of the study, the six-month MACE-rate (MACE = Major Adverse Cardiac Events) was 13.4% (two cardiac death; five Q-wave/nine non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions (MI); nine CABG and 32 target lesion revascularization (TLR), which is similar to the calculated 15% MACE-rate in comparable reference studies. Secondary end-points included among others restenosis at six months in the SOPHOS A population. The target vessel diameter was 2.98 +/- 0.48 mm. Minimal lumen diameter pre/post procedure and at follow-up was 1.00 +/- 0.32, 2.69 +/- 0.37, 1.91 +/- 0.71 mm, respectively. The binary restenosis rate (>/=50% diameter stenosis at follow-up) was 17.7%. CONCLUSION: The coronary BiodivYsio stent is safe and effective as a primary device for the treatment of native coronary artery lesions in patients with stable or unstable angina pectoris. Clinical and angiographic results are in the statistical range of equivalence with comparable studies with other current stents.     

Clinical and angiographic results with the NIR stent: First International NIR Endovascular Stent Study (FINESS-II)

BACKGROUND: Although safety and efficacy of the NIR trade mark stent have been reported, the long-term angiographic and clinical outcomes have yet to be investigated. The FINESS-II study (First International NIR Endovascular Stent Study) was designed to assess the procedural safety of single 9 and 16 mm NIR stent implantation, the six-month restenosis rate and finally the six- and 12-month clinical outcome of patients treated with this novel coronary stent. METHODS: Patients with angina and a single de novo lesion in a native coronary artery of >3 and <5 mm diameter were included in this multicentre, prospective, observational trial. Clinical follow-up was obtained at one, six and 12 months. Angiography was performed before and after the stent implantation and at six months. The primary endpoint included major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization) within 30 days after the procedure. Major bleeding complications and subacute stent thrombosis within the first 30 days were also reported as specific endpoints. Secondary endpoints were major cardiac-event-free survival at six- and 12-month follow-up and angiographic restenosis at six months. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients (81% male, mean age 60 +/- 10 years), with stable (54%), unstable (40%) angina pectoris or silent ischemia (6%) were enrolled. The target vessel diameter was 2.94 +/- 0.54 mm. The minimal lumen diameter pre, post and at follow-up was 1.04 +/- 0.32 mm, 2.64 +/- 0.42 mm and 1.88 +/- 0.63 mm, respectively. Restenosis rate according to the >50% diameter stenosis criterion at six month follow-up was 19% (26/136). At 12 months, the event-free survival rate was 83% (two deaths, one Q-wave and three non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions, four bypass surgery and 17 target lesion revascularizations), while 87% of the patients were free of angina pectoris. CONCLUSION: the outcome of the FINESS-II trial is comparable to those observed in previous stent trials (Benestent II), indicating that the coronary NIR stent is safe and effective as a primary device for the treatment of native coronary artery lesions in patients with (un)stable angina pectoris.     

Efficiency of endovascular re-interventions for evolving restenosis of different types of stents

The paper compares the results of different treatment options (balloon angioplasty and restenting) for in-stent restenosis in case of evolving restenosis of drug- and nondrug eluting stents. The investigation enrolled 496 coronary heart disease patients with clinical presentation of angina pectoris and/or signs of myocardial ischemia, as well as hemodynamic restenosis of a previously implanted stent. Of them, 216 and 280 patients had restenosis of previously implanted drug- and nondrug-eluting stents, respectively. In the patients with non-drug-eluting stent restenosis, recurrent angina pectoris and the frequency of repeated restenosis were significantly more frequently observed after balloon dilatation than after drug-eluting stent implantation (28.4 and 10.2%; p < 0.05; 19.9 and 8.7%; p < 0.05). In those with drug-eluting stent restenosis, recurrent angina pectoris and the frequency of repeated restenosis did not differ significantly between balloon dilatation of restenosis and implantation of a second drug-eluting stent.     

Initial and long-term results with the CrossFlex stent--data from a national registry

The Cordis CrossFlex trade mark stent is a balloon expandable helical coil made of stainless steel. OBJECTIVE: To assess the short- and long-term safety and efficacy of this stent by conducting a multi-center national registry. METHODS: One hundred and sixteen stents were implanted in 109 patients (mean age 59 3 10 years, 95 males). The lesions were classified as type B2 or C in 56 patients (51%). Successful deployment was achieved in 103 patients (94.5%). Failure was due to damage to the stent (two patients) or inability to reach the lesion (four patients). High-pressure deployment (>14 atm) was used in 68% of cases. RESULTS: Edge dissections occurred in nine patients after high-pressure deployment and necessitated implantation of a second stent. One patient with a large acute myocardial infarction died during hospitalization. Side branch occlusion occurred in five patients (4.6%). Subacute thrombosis occurred in two patients (1.8%) during the first four weeks. During a six-month follow-up period, 18 patients (16.5%) were rehospitalized with recurrent angina. Fifteen patients had coronary angiography and 13 (12.1%) needed additional target lesion revascularization (TLR). Twelve patients required a second PTCA for in-stent restenosis, and one needed a coronary artery bypass graft operation. CONCLUSIONS: The CrossFlex coronary stent can successfully be used in complex coronary lesions, with few short-term complications and a low TLR rate. Operators should be aware of the possibility of edge dissection during high-pressure implantation.     

Preliminary experience with the Tsunami coronary stent: immediate and six-month clinical and angiographic results

The Tsunami is a new, balloon-expandable, stainless steel, tubular coronary stent whose design is based on a number of radial, diamond-shaped cells joined by double connectors. The aim of this two-centre, prospective, nonrandomized study was to examine the procedural, in-hospital, and long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients undergoing angioplasty with the Tsunami stent. Sixty-one consecutive unselected patients were treated by means of the implantation of 74 Tsunami stents in 72 coronary lesions. Most of the patients (64%) had unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction. The baseline lesion morphology was complex in 76% of cases, and the mean lesion length was 14 +/- 6 mm. The procedural success rate was 98%. Mean percentage diameter of the stenosis decreased after the intervention from 79 +/- 12% to 10 +/- 6%. The in-hospital major adverse cardiac event rate was 3.3%. During the six-month follow-up, there was one cardiac death and nine subjects (14.5%) underwent target vessel revascularization. The six-month event-free survival rate was 80%. The angiographic restenosis rate was 17%: a focal or limited pattern (class I or II) was found in 43% of cases, whereas the remaining 57% had a proliferative morphology (class III or IV). In conclusion, this study indicates the good clinical and angiographic performance of the Tsunami coronary stent system in consecutive unselected patients.     

Long-term comparison of balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting versus routine stenting in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome

Background. In patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) who are eligible for PCI, routine stenting is the recommended treatment strategy, based on the opinion of experts. Provisional stenting may provide a viable alternative by retaining the early benefits of stenting without its potential late hazards. Method. Patients with NSTE-ACS were randomised to provisional or routine stenting after coronary angiography. Patients were followed for up to ten years. The occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was recorded. Results. 237 consecutive patients with NSTE-ACS were randomly assigned to routine stenting (n=116) or provisional stenting (n=121). No difference in the incidence of MACE at 30 days was observed. At six months, angiographic restenosis was lower in the routine stenting group (41 vs. 20%, p=0.02), paralleled by more MACE in the provisional stenting group at one year (40.5 vs. 27.6%, p=0.036). At complete follow-up the difference in MACE was not significant (61.2 vs. 50%, p=0.084) because of relatively more target lesion revascularisations in the routine stent group. There was no difference in the incidence of very late stent thrombosis (1.7 vs. 3.4%, p=0.439). The only independent predictor of MACE was β-blocker use (RR 0.62 [0.431; 0.892] p=0.010). Conclusion. In selective patients with NSTE-ACS, routine stenting was more beneficial than provisional stenting for a period of up to five years, driven by a reduction in repeat revascularisation procedures. After this period, the benefit was no longer significant. Beta-blocker use was the only independent predictor of MACE throughout the complete follow-up period. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:307-313.)     

Coronary stent implantation throughout technical evolution: immediate and follow-up results

Coronary stenting (stent implantation) has evolved over the last 5 years with changes in stent design, stent material and the implantation technique. The use of high-pressure balloon inflation (HP), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and appropriate antiplatelet therapy have contributed to the abolishment of the need for subsequent anticoagulation, allowing extended stent applications. We compared results in three groups of patients having stent implantation throughout the period of evolution: group A: no IVUS, no HP, with subsequent anticoagulation treatment (n 3 434); group B: no IVUS, yes HP, without subsequent anticoagulation treatment (n 3 192); and group C: yes IVUS, yes HP, without subsequent anticoagulation treatment (n 3 588). The primary success rates were comparable in all groups. There was a clear change in indications for stenting in groups B and C compared with group A (elective stenting: group A 3 32%; group B 3 66%; group C 3 69%; P < 0.0001), in reference vessel size (group A 3 3.22 3 0.37 mm; group B 3 2.92 3 0.56 mm; group C 3 2.98 3 0.57 mm; P < 0.0001), and for presence of type B2 and C lesions (group A 3 57%; group B 3 72%; group C 3 74%; P < 0.001). The complication rate significantly decreased in group C (group A 3 3.6%; group B 3 4.1%; group C 3 1.2%; P < 0.001) and the mean patient hospital stay decreased to 2 days in groups B and C due to the abolition of the need for anticoagulant treatment. The angiographic restenosis rate increased in groups B and C (group A 3 20%; group B 3 34%; group C 3 32%; P < 0.001). The need for a repeat procedure increased as stenting of more complex lesions and smaller vessels was attempted: target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 16% of patients in group A (73/434), in 18% of group B (35/192) and in 22% of group C (129/588) (P 3 0.04 for A versus C). Major cardiac events (MACE) occurred in 142 patients in group A (33%), 60 patients in group B (31%) and in 181 patients in group C (30%). The evolving technique of coronary stenting has expanded the spectrum of indications and range of coronary vessels attempted, and decreased the complication rates and hospital stay. However, in less-favorable subsets, additional improvements are needed to affect the long-term outcome.     

Clinical and angiographic results with the ACS MULTI-LINK DUET trade mark Coronary Stent System - the DUET Study

BACKGROUND: The DUET Study is a multicenter prospective efficacy and safety evaluation of the ACS MULTI-LINK DUET coronary stainless steel balloon-expandable stent. AIMS: The primary objective was to determine the one-month incidence of MACE (major adverse cardiac events). The secondary objectives were the acute success rate, the restenosis and reocclusion rates (assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)) at six months and the occurrence of MACE in hospital and at six months. METHODS: Two hundred and ten patients were enrolled between February and June 1998 in 18 European centers. Successful stent placement was achieved in 209 patients. All patients were treated with ticlopidine 500 mg/day for one month and with aspirin >/=100 mg/day. To allow the investigators to gain familiarity with the stent system, the first one to three patients per center formed a separate lead-in population leaving an intention-to-treat population of 157 patients. The majority of the intention-to-treat population were male (79%); 28% had unstable angina, 69% had stable angina, 44% had had a previous myocardial infarction, 15% had had a previous percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and 3% had a history of stroke. The target vessel was 38.5% left anterior descending artery, 20.5% left circumflex artery and 41.0% right coronary artery. RESULTS: All but one of the intention-to-treat patients were effectively stented (17 required multiple stents). Six-month angiographic follow-up was available in 90% of the intention-to-treat population. Minimal lumen diameter (MLD) postprocedure was 2.61 +/- 0.33 mm, with a residual diameter stenosis of 16%. Six-month follow-up data showed an MLD of 1.87 +/- 0.56 mm with a residual diameter stenosis of 36%. The binary restenosis rate (>/=50% residual stenosis) was 15.6%. Up to one month following the procedure 94.9% of the population was MACE-free, with two subacute occlusions. At six months all patients were alive, of whom 82.8% were MACE-free, and 73% were free of anginal complaints. CONCLUSION: The results observed in the current DUET registry are comparable to data of other balloon-expandable-stent trials, with a low incidence of clinical events at follow-up.     

One-year clinical follow-up of a registry evaluating a percutaneous revascularisation strategy combining a pre-specified simple selection process with the use of a new thin-strut bare cobalt-chromium stent

Objectives. To evaluate clinical events in a specifically selected cohort of patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), using a new generation thin-strut bare cobalt-chromium coronary stent. Methods. Patients with single- or multi-vessel, stable or unstable CAD eligible for percutaneous implantation of at least one bare cobalt-chromium stent were evaluated in a single-centre registry. Prospective pre-specified criteria for bare cobalt-chromium stent implantation in our centre were: any acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI), otherwise 1) de novo coronary lesion, and 2) lesion length <20 mm, and 3) reference vessel diameter >2.6 mm, and 4) no diabetes, unless reference vessel diameter >3.5 mm. Endpoints, retrospectively collected, were death, MI and clinically driven target-lesion revascularisation (TLR) and target-vessel revascularisation (TVR) after 12 months. Results. Between September 2005 and June 2007, 712 patients (48.7% one-vessel, 29.9% two-vessel, 20% three-vessel and 1.4% left main disease; 7.9% diabetics) were treated with 800 bare cobalt-chromium stents, for stable angina (40.9%), unstable angina (20.9%) or acute ST-elevation MI (38.2%). The procedural success rate was 99.3%. Peri-procedural MI rate was 2.2% in the semi-elective group. At 12 months there were 17 deaths (2.4%), of which nine non-cardiac, 20 (2.8%) MI, 19 (2.7%) TLR and 29 (4.1%) TVR. Early and late definite stent thrombosis occurred in four (0.6%) and three (0.4%) patients, respectively. Conclusion. A strategy aimed at minimising drug-eluting stent use and combining a pre-specified simple selection process with the use of a new thin-strut bare cobalt-chromium stent is safe and effective at one-year clinical follow-up. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:486-92.)     

Initial results and long-term clinical follow-up of an amorphous hydrogenated silicon-carbide-coated stent in daily practice

The hemocompatibility and biocompatibility of a stent are determined by the physical and electrochemical properties of the stent surface. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility, safety and efficacy of implantation of a stent coated with silicon carbide. Baseline characteristics were collected prospectively. The occurrence of cardiac adverse events and the angina score were assessed at clinical follow-up. A total of 193 Tensum stents were implanted in 174 patients. In hospital, one patient experienced stent thrombosis and in 6% of the patients a creatinine kinase elevation to 240 U/l or more occurred. Long-term follow-up was performed in 172 patients, with a mean follow-up of 454 +/- 181 days. Ninety-seven per cent were still alive, 15% had undergone target-vessel revascularization, and 2% had angiographic restenosis and were treated with medication only. Seventy-one per cent of the patients were free of anginal complaints, and 20% had anginal complaints in Canadian Cardiac Society class I or II. The Tensum coronary stent showed to be a safe and efficacious device in this study, with a high primary success rate and favorable long-term clinical followup.