神经胶质瘤生物标志物研究进展

神经胶质瘤(glioma)是最常见的原发性脑肿瘤,占颅内肿瘤的81%。神经胶质瘤的诊断手段与预后评估主要以影像学为主,但因神经胶质瘤的浸润性生长特点,影像学不能完全作为诊断及预后评估依据。因此,发现和鉴定全新生物标志物对神经胶质瘤的诊断、治疗和预后评估显得尤为重要。最新研究结果表明,在神经胶质瘤患者组织和血液中,多种生物标志物可用于神经胶质瘤的辅助诊断和预后评估。其中,诊断标志物包括IDH1/2基因突变、BRAF基因突变与融合、p53基因突变、端粒酶活性增加、循环肿瘤细胞和非编码RNA等。预后标志物包括1p/19p共缺失、MGMT基因启动子甲基化及基质金属蛋白酶-28、胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白-2和CD26的表达上调和Smad4的表达下调。本文重点介绍了上述神经胶质瘤生物标志物在诊断和预后评估方面的最新研究进展。     

脑胶质瘤MGMT、hMLH1和hMSH2基因启动子甲基化状态研究

目的：探讨脑胶质瘤患者O6-甲基鸟嘌呤-DNA甲基转移酶基因MGMT和错配修复基因hMLH1、hMSH2启动子CpG岛甲基化状态,及其在烷化剂化疗中的意义。方法：采用甲基化特异性PCR（MSP）方法检测39例脑胶质瘤和6例正常脑组织MGMT、hMLH1和hMSH2基因启动子区的甲基化状态,免疫组化方法测定蛋白表达。结果：脑胶质瘤患者组织MGMT、hMLH1和hMSH2基因启动子区甲基化发生率分别为46.2%、10.3%和20.5%,3种基因启动子未甲基化模式与其对应蛋白表达模式相似,并与患者性别、年龄、病理类型和病理分级无明显相关性。回顾性分析患者资料,显示39例脑胶质瘤患者中,MGMT基因甲基化的患者生存期显著高于MGMT基因未甲基化患者（P〈0.05,Log-rank检验）。结论：MGMT及错配修复基因甲基化是脑胶质瘤发生过程中常见的分子事件,可能与肿瘤的发生有关;检测MGMT、hMLH1和hMSH2基因启动子甲基化状态,在判断脑胶质瘤患者预后和预测烷化剂化疗耐药性中可能具有重要意义。     

脑胶质瘤患者组织和血清MGMT、hMLH1和hMSH2基因启动子甲基化状态检测

目的探讨脑胶质瘤患者组织和血清中MGMT、hMLH1和hMSH2基因启动子CpG岛甲基化发生率及相关性。方法甲基化特异性PCR（MSP）检测39例脑胶质瘤组织样本及32例预处理的脑胶质瘤血清样本中MGMT、hMLH1和hMSH2基因启动子区的甲基化状态。结果脑胶质瘤组织MGMT、hMLH1和hMSH2基因启动子区甲基化发生率分别为46．2％、10．3％和20．5％,肿瘤组织中至少有一种基因甲基化的发生率为64．1％（25／39）;在脑胶质瘤患者外周循环血液中检测到了相关基因甲基化系列,并且与组织中基因甲基化发生率明显相关。结论MGMT、hMLH1和hMSH2基因启动子甲基化是脑胶质瘤发生过程中常见的分子事件,血清中相关基因DNA甲基化检测有可能为脑胶质瘤诊断和个体化化疗提供一种稳定的无创性检测指标。     

IDH1基因突变在胶质瘤中的研究进展

胶质瘤是颅内最常见的恶性肿瘤,发病率逐年增高。越来越多的证据表明IDH1基因突变与胶质瘤密切相关。本文就近年来有关胶质瘤与IDH1基因突变的研究作一综述。IDH1基因编码胞浆内NADP依赖的异柠檬酸脱氢酶,后者能够对异柠檬酸进行催化生成α-酮戊二酸。在40%的胶质瘤中存在IDH1突变,在继发性胶质母细胞瘤中变异率最高。作为一种代谢的关键酶,IDH1突变后可以将α-KG转变成2-HG,后者具有促进细胞增殖和促进肿瘤发生的作用。而且,IDH1突变可以导致胶质瘤代谢和表观遗传学方面的改变。同时,IDH1突变可以通过增加HIF-1α水平及活性增加血管生成。目前在不同级别的胶质瘤当中,IDH1突变已经成为一个与预后密切相关的独立预测因素。对IDH1突变的研究有助于深入了解胶质瘤病因及干预措施的具体机制,有助于胶质瘤的分子水平分类和治疗。     

MGMT 甲基化影响替莫唑胺对胶质母细胞瘤疗效的研究

目的:探讨MGMT甲基化如何影响替莫唑胺对胶质母细胞瘤的治疗效果。方法:选取41个胶质母细胞瘤患者(根据相同替莫唑胺化疗方案治疗下临床结局的不同分为两组)的肿瘤组织,采用甲基化特异性聚合酶链反应分析胶质瘤组织中MGMT基因启动子区过甲基化状态,同时采用免疫组织化学法分析胶质瘤组织中MGMT蛋白表达情况。结果:临床结局不佳组中,以MGMT蛋白表达阳性的肿瘤为主(72.2%),而在结局相对良好组中,MGMT蛋白表达的阳性率仅为39.1%;在MGMT蛋白表达阳性的22例胶质母细胞瘤组织中,7例MGMT启动子甲基化,阳性率为31.8%,在MGMGT蛋白表达阴性的19例中,14例MGMT启动子甲基化,阳性率为73.7%(P<0.05)。结论:MGMT基因启动子区的甲基化状态与MGMT蛋白的表达相关。MGMT基因启动子过甲基化,MGMT蛋白表达较低;MGMT基因启动子去甲基化,MGMT蛋白表达较高。MGMT启动子过甲基化通过抑制MGMT基因的表达而增加替莫唑胺的疗效。     

脑胶质瘤IDH1基因突变HRM检测方法的初步建立

在大多数弥漫性人脑胶质瘤中常伴随着异柠檬酸脱氢酶基因(isocitrate dehydrogenase gene)1(IDH1)的突变.有着此突变的胶质瘤患者在临床上有良好的预后效果,因此可以作为胶质瘤患者的分子标记.通过提取石蜡切片中的胶质瘤组织DNA,优化条件以初步建立IDH1基因突变高分辨率熔解曲线分析法(high resolution melting,HRM)检测方法.用HRM对胶质瘤石蜡包埋组织标本中IDH1基因检测突变,并用直接测序法对比,观察反应体系和反应条件的可行性.正交试验结果证明引物最适退火温度为53℃,20μL HRM反应体系中,0.6μmol/L引物,2.5 mmol/L Mg2+,60 ng DNA模板为最佳.HRM IDH1基因突变的结果和直接测序法结果一致,但灵敏度更高.说明此HRM方法简单,特异性强,准确可靠,可为IDH1突变检测的临床应用提供借鉴依据.     

人脑胶质瘤中的IDH1/2突变

胶质母细胞瘤的基因组突变分析中发现的异柠檬酸脱氢酶(isocitrate dehydrogenase,IDH1)突变对胶质瘤的认识具有突破性意义。随后,在胶质瘤中发现了IDH1的R132碱基和IDH2的R172碱基突变。IDH1突变较多的发生在WHOII-III级胶质瘤和继发胶质母细胞瘤中。这种突变改变了异柠檬酸脱氢酶的结构,从而使将异柠檬酸转化为a-酮戊二酸的能力丧失,而获得将a-酮戊二酸转化为2-羟基戊二酸这一新的酶活性。在临床中,IDH1和IDH2突变已经显示对胶质瘤患者有诊断和预后意义。同时,现今也发展了一些检测方法。     

胶质瘤中的异柠檬酸脱氢酶突变

胶质母细胞瘤的基因组突变分析中发现的异柠檬酸脱氢酶（isocitrate dehydrogenase,IDH）突变对胶质瘤的认识具有突破性意义.随后,在胶质瘤中发现了IDH1的R132碱基和IDH2的R172碱基突变.IDH1突变较多的发生在WHOⅡ～Ⅲ级胶质瘤和继发胶质母细胞瘤中.这种突变改变了异柠檬酸脱氢酶的结构,从而使将异柠檬酸转化为α-酮戊二酸的能力丧失,而获得将α-酮戊二酸转化为D-2-羟基戊二酸这一新的酶活性.在临床中,IDH1和IDH2突变已经显示对胶质瘤患者有诊断和预后意义.同时,现今也发展了一些检测方法.     

发现遏制肿瘤生长的有效代谢物

复旦大学生物医学研究院熊跃、管坤良教授所领导科研团队的研究成果—“神经胶质瘤衍生的IDH1突变显性抑制酶催化活性,激活HIFI”,初步探明了基因突变促进神经胶质瘤生长的分子机理,找到了遏制肿瘤生长的有效代谢物,为神经胶质瘤及其他肿瘤的治疗带来希望.IDH1基因突变在继发性神经胶质瘤中的突变频率高达75％以上,使得IDH1基因成为潜在的神经胶质瘤的诊断指针和靶向治疗目标。     

人脑胶质瘤细胞中GDNF 基因启动子1 区甲基化状态的研究

目的:观察GDNF启动子1区在人脑胶质瘤细胞中的甲基化修饰状态,以期探讨其对于GDNF在胶质瘤中高表达的影响。方法:基因测序检测10例胶质瘤与5例正常脑组织中GDNF基因序列,比较其基因是否有突变发生;重亚硫酸盐修饰后基因测序检测20例胶质瘤(10例低级别和10例高级别)与5例正常脑组织中GDNF启动子1区甲基化修饰状态。结果:GDNF启动子1区基因在胶质瘤中没有发生突变;GDNF启动子1区甲基化修饰在正常脑组织、低级别、高级别中发生率分别为72.25%、86.25%、86.75%。在胶质瘤中的甲基化修饰水平比正常脑组织明显增高(P<0.05),而高低级别之间无显著性差异。结论:在胶质瘤细胞中,GDNF启动子1区发生了高甲基化修饰,这种修饰很可能会影响GDNF基因的表达。     

Prognostic Stratification of GBMs Using Combinatorial Assessment of IDH1 Mutation,MGMT Promoter Methylation,and TERT Mutation Status: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center in India

This study aims to establish the best and simplified panel of molecular markers for prognostic stratification of glioblastomas (GBMs). One hundred fourteen cases of GBMs were studied for IDH1, TP53, and TERT mutation by Sanger sequencing; EGFR and PDGFRA amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization; NF1expression by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR); and MGMT promoter methylation by methylation-specific PCR. IDH1 mutant cases had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as compared to IDH1 wild-type cases. Combinatorial assessment of MGMT and TERT emerged as independent prognostic markers, especially in the IDH1 wild-type GBMs. Thus, within the IDH1 wild-type group, cases with only MGMT methylation (group 1) had the best outcome (median PFS: 83.3 weeks; OS: not reached), whereas GBMs with only TERT mutation (group 3) had the worst outcome (PFS: 19.7 weeks; OS: 32.8 weeks). Cases with both or none of these alterations (group 2) had intermediate prognosis (PFS: 47.6 weeks; OS: 89.2 weeks). Majority of the IDH1 mutant GBMs belonged to group 1 (75%), whereas only 18.7% and 6.2% showed group 2 and 3 signatures, respectively. Interestingly, none of the other genetic alterations were significantly associated with survival in IDH1 mutant or wild-type GBMs.Based on above findings, we recommend assessment of three markers, viz., IDH1, MGMT, and TERT, for GBM prognostication in routine practice. We show for the first time that IDH1 wild-type GBMs which constitute majority of the GBMs can be effectively stratified into three distinct prognostic subgroups based on MGMT and TERT status, irrespective of other genetic alterations.     

The global DNA methylation surrogate LINE-1 methylation is correlated with MGMT promoter methylation and is a better prognostic factor for glioma

Gliomas are the most frequently occurring primary brain tumor in the central nervous system of adults. Glioblastoma multiformes (GBMs, WHO grade 4) have a dismal prognosis despite the use of the alkylating agent, temozolomide (TMZ), and even low grade gliomas (LGGs, WHO grade 2) eventually transform to malignant secondary GBMs. Although GBM patients benefit from promoter hypermethylation of the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) that is the main determinant of resistance to TMZ, recent studies suggested that MGMT promoter methylation is of prognostic as well as predictive significance for the efficacy of TMZ. Glioma-CpG island methylator phenotype (G-CIMP) in the global genome was shown to be a significant predictor of improved survival in patients with GBM. Collectively, we hypothesized that MGMT promoter methylation might reflect global DNA methylation. Additionally in LGGs, the significance of MGMT promoter methylation is still undetermined. In the current study, we aimed to determine the correlation between clinical, genetic, and epigenetic profiles including LINE-1 and different cancer-related genes and the clinical outcome in newly diagnosed 57 LGG and 54 GBM patients. Here, we demonstrated that (1) IDH1/2 mutation is closely correlated with MGMT promoter methylation and 1p/19q codeletion in LGGs, (2) LINE-1 methylation levels in primary and secondary GBMs are lower than those in LGGs and normal brain tissues, (3) LINE-1 methylation is proportional to MGMT promoter methylation in gliomas, and (4) higher LINE-1 methylation is a favorable prognostic factor in primary GBMs, even compared to MGMT promoter methylation. As a global DNA methylation marker, LINE-1 may be a promising marker in gliomas.     

IDH1 mutations is prognostic marker for primary glioblastoma multiforme but MGMT hypermethylation is not prognostic for primary glioblastoma multiforme

Purpose

To establish the frequency of IDH1 mutations and MGMT methylation in primary glioblastomas.

Experimental design

We screened primary glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in a population-based study for IDH1 mutations and MGMT methylation and correlated them with clinical data.

Results

IDH1 mutations were detected in 5 of 40 primary glioblastomas (12,5%). Primary GBM patients carrying IDH1 mutations were significantly younger, mean age of 41 ± 5.06 years, than patients with wild-type IDH1, mean age of 57 ± 2,29 years, p = 0.011. The mean survival time of all GBM patients with and without IDH1 mutations was 19 months (5 cases) and 16 months (35 cases), respectively (p > 0,05). MGMT methylation was detected in 13 of the 40 patients (32,5%). MGMT-promoter methylation did not correlate with overall survival (OS; p > 0,05).

Conclusion

In summary, our study is the first study to investigate the IDH1 mutation status and MGMT methylation in primary GBMs in Turkish population and confirmed IDH1 mutation as a genetic marker for also primary GBMs. Our data are still insufficient for definite ascertainment; and our preliminary results suggest: IDH1 status shows an association with younger age and there is a lack of association between IDH1 mutation and survival time. Furthermore MGMT promoter methylation had no prognostic value and lower frequency in primary glioblastomas.     

A glycolysis-based ten-gene signature correlates with the clinical outcome,molecular subtype and IDH1 mutation in glioblastoma

Reprogrammed metabolism is a hallmark of cancer. Glioblastoma (GBM) tumor cells predominantly utilize aerobic glycolysis for the biogenesis of energy and intermediate nutrients. However, in GBM, the clinical significance of glycolysis and its underlying relations with the molecular features such as IDH1 mutation and subtype have not been elucidated yet. Herein, based on glioma datasets including TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas), REMBRANDT (Repository for Molecular Brain Neoplasia Data) and GSE16011, we established a glycolytic gene expression signature score (GGESS) by incorporating ten glycolytic genes. Then we performed survival analyses and investigated the correlations between GGESS and IDH1 mutation as well as the molecular subtypes in GBMs. The results showed that GGESS independently predicted unfavorable prognosis and poor response to chemotherapy of GBM patients. Notably, GGESS was high in GBMs of mesenchymal subtype but low in IDH1-mutant GBMs. Furthermore, we found that the promoter regions of tumor-promoting glycolytic genes were hypermethylated in IDH1-mutant GBMs. Finally, we found that high GGESS also predicted poor prognosis and poor response to chemotherapy when investigating IDH1-wildtype GBM patients only. Collectively, glycolysis represented by GGESS predicts unfavorable clinical outcome of GBM patients and is closely associated with mesenchymal subtype and IDH1 mutation in GBMs.     

O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in glioma therapy: Promise and problems

Gliomas are the most frequent adult primary brain tumor, and are invariably fatal. The most common diagnosis glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) afflicts 12,500 new patients in the U.S. annually, and has a median survival of approximately one year when treated with the current standard of care. Alkylating agents have long been central in the chemotherapy of GBM and other gliomas. The DNA repair protein O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), the principal human activity that removes cytotoxic O(6)-alkylguanine adducts from DNA, promotes resistance to anti-glioma alkylators, including temozolomide and BCNU, in GBM cell lines and xenografts. Moreover, MGMT expression assessed by immunohistochemistry, biochemical activity or promoter CpG methylation status is associated with the response of GBM to alkylator-based therapies, providing evidence that MGMT promotes clinical resistance to alkylating agents. These observations suggest a role for MGMT in directing adjuvant therapy of GBM and other gliomas. Promoter methylation status is the most clinically tractable measure of MGMT, and there is considerable enthusiasm for exploring its utility as a marker to assign therapy to individual patients. Here, we provide an overview of the biochemical, genetic and biological characteristics of MGMT as they relate to glioma therapy. We consider current methods to assess MGMT expression and discuss their utility as predictors of treatment response. Particular emphasis is given to promoter methylation status and the methodological and conceptual impediments that limit its use to direct treatment. We conclude by considering approaches that may improve the utility of MGMT methylation status in planning optimal therapies tailored to individual patients.     

O-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in glioma therapy: Promise and problems

Gliomas are the most frequent adult primary brain tumor, and are invariably fatal. The most common diagnosis glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) afflicts 12,500 new patients in the U.S. annually, and has a median survival of approximately one year when treated with the current standard of care. Alkylating agents have long been central in the chemotherapy of GBM and other gliomas. The DNA repair protein O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), the principal human activity that removes cytotoxic O⁶-alkylguanine adducts from DNA, promotes resistance to anti-glioma alkylators, including temozolomide and BCNU, in GBM cell lines and xenografts. Moreover, MGMT expression assessed by immunohistochemistry, biochemical activity or promoter CpG methylation status is associated with the response of GBM to alkylator-based therapies, providing evidence that MGMT promotes clinical resistance to alkylating agents. These observations suggest a role for MGMT in directing adjuvant therapy of GBM and other gliomas. Promoter methylation status is the most clinically tractable measure of MGMT, and there is considerable enthusiasm for exploring its utility as a marker to assign therapy to individual patients. Here, we provide an overview of the biochemical, genetic and biological characteristics of MGMT as they relate to glioma therapy. We consider current methods to assess MGMT expression and discuss their utility as predictors of treatment response. Particular emphasis is given to promoter methylation status and the methodological and conceptual impediments that limit its use to direct treatment. We conclude by considering approaches that may improve the utility of MGMT methylation status in planning optimal therapies tailored to individual patients.     

Genetic and Epigenetic Alterations in Primary–Progressive Paired Oligodendroglial Tumors

The aim of the present study was to identify genetic and epigenetic alterations involved in the progression of oligodendroglial tumors. We characterized 21 paired, World Health Organization (WHO) grade II and III oligodendroglial tumors from patients who received craniotomies for the partial or complete resection of primary and secondary oligodendroglial tumors. Tumor DNA was analyzed for alterations in selected genetic loci (1p36, 9p22, 10q23–24, 17p13, 19q13, 22q12), isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1), isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) and the CpG island methylation status of critical tumor-related genes (MGMT, P16, DAPK, PTEN, RASSF1A, Rb1). Alterations of these markers were common early in the tumorigenesis. In the primary tumors we identified 12 patients (57.1%) with 1p36 deletions, 17 (81.0%) with 19q13 deletions, 9 (42.9%) with 1p36/19q13 codeletions, 11 (52.3%) with 9p22 deletions, and 12 (57.1%) with IDH1 mutation. Epigenetic analysis detected promoter methylation of the MGMT, P16, DAPK, PTEN, RASSF1A, and Rb1 genes in 38.1%, 19.0%, 38.1%, 33.3%, 66.7%, and 14.3% of primary tumors, respectively. After progression, additional losses of 1p, 9p, 10q, 17p, 19q and 22q were observed in 3 (14.3%), 1 (4.8%), 3 (14.3%), 2 (9.5%), 1 (4.8%) and 3 (14.3%) cases, respectively. Additional methylations of the MGMT, P16, DAPK, PTEN, RASSF1A, and RB1 promoters was observed in 4 (19.0%), 2 (9.5%), 0 (0%), 6 (28.6%), 2(9.5%) and 3 (14.3%) cases, respectively. The status of IDH1 mutation remained unchanged in all tumors after progression. The primary tumors of three patients with subsequent progression to high-grade astrocytomas, all had 9p deletion, intact 1p, intact 10q and unmethylated MGMT. Whether this may represent a molecular signature of patients at-risk for the development of aggressive astrocytomas needs further investigation.