Study of the factors affecting the extraction of soybean protein by reverse micelles

In this work, the forward and back extraction of soybean protein by reverse micelles was studied. The reverse micellar systems were formed by anionic surfactant sodium bis(2-ethyl hexyl) sulfosuccinate (AOT), isooctane and KCl solution. The effects of AOT concentration, aqueous pH, KCl concentration and phase volume ratio on the extraction efficiency of soybean protein were tested. Suitability of reverse micelles of AOT and Triton-X-100/AOT mixture in organic solvent toluene for soybean protein extraction was also investigated. The experimental results lead to complete forward extraction at the AOT concentration 120 mmol l⁻¹, aqueous pH 5.5 and KCl concentration 0.8 mol l⁻¹. The backward extraction with aqueous phase (pH 5.5) resulted in 100% extraction of soybean protein from the organic phase.     

Protein extraction by reverse micelles: studies on the recovery of horseradish peroxidase

Phase transfer studies were carried out on the solubilization of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (E.C. 1.11.1.7) in reverse micelles formed in isooctane using the anionic surfactant, aerosol OT, at concentrations between 50 and 110mM. The selectivity of this methodology was tested, because the HRP used comprised a mixture of seven different isoenzymes with a wide range of isoelectric points. Forward and backward transfers were carried out in wellstirred vessels until equilibrium was reached. Significant protein partitioning could only be obtained by using NaCl to adjust ionic strength in pH range between 1.5 and 3.5, with a maximum at pH 3. The back transfer process was best at pH 8 with 80mM phosphate buffer and 1 M KCI. A loss of 1% to 3% of the surfactant through precipitation at the interface at pH<4 was observed, which may be due to instability in this pH region, because, even without protein, a similar precipitate was noticed. Protein partitioning was approximately constant when the ionic strength was increased up to 1 MNaCl at pH 3, but protein recovery in back transfer decreased accordingly. Hydrophobic interactions together with association between the protein and surfactant might be responsible for that behavior. Protein partitioning remained the same when the surfactant concentration was decreased to 50 mM, at the expense of higher variability. HPLC chromatograms showed no apparent damage to the protein after reverse micellar extraction. Protein partitioning is best when the temperature is kept at 25xC. The amount of protein and specific activity recovered strongly depends on the phase ratio used during forward transfer. Overall activity recovery varied from 87% to 136% when the phase ratio was increased from 1:1 to 30:1 in forward transfer. This behavior may be due to a change in the ratio of the three isoenzymes recovered after the backward transfer process, with the most active one being increasingly enriched at higher phase ratios. (c) 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Extraction of bovine serum albumin using nanoparticulate reverse micelles

The extraction of a relatively large molecular weight protein, bovine serum albumin (BSA), using nano-sized reverse micelles of nonionic surfactant polyoxyethylene p-t-octylphenol (Triton-X-100) is attempted for the first time. Suitability of reverse micelles of anionic surfactant sodium bis (2-ethyl hexyl) sulfosuccinate (AOT) and Triton-X-100/AOT mixture in organic solvent toluene for BSA extraction is also investigated. Although, the size of the Triton-X-100 reverse micelle in toluene is large enough to host BSA molecule in the hydraulic core, the overall extraction efficiency is found to be low, which may be due to lack of strong driving force. AOT/toluene system resulted in complete forward extraction at aqueous pH 5.5 and a surfactant concentration of 160 mM. The back extraction with aqueous phase (pH 5.5) resulted in 100% extraction of BSA from the organic phase. The addition of Triton-X-100 to AOT reduced the extraction efficiency of AOT reverse micelles, which may be attributed to reduced hydrophobic interaction. The circular dichroism (CD) spectrum of BSA extracted using AOT/toluene reverse micelles indicated the structural stability of the protein extracted.     

Separation and purification of lipase using reverse micellar extraction: Optimization of conditions by response surface methodology

Downstream processing of lipase involving reverse micellar extraction of lipase using cationic surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) was investigated. Effect of various process parameters on both forward and backward extraction of lipase from crude extract was studied to optimize its yield and purity. Complex interaction of salt concentration (0.05∼0.15M), surfactant concentration (0.10∼0.30 M), and pH (6.0∼9.0) for forward extraction, as well as, salt concentration (0.5∼1.5 M) and pH (6.0∼9.0) for backward extraction have been studied using response surface methodology. Optimum processing conditions, namely, salt concentration 0.16M, surfactant concentration 0.20 M, and pH 9.0 for forward extraction, as well as, salt concentration 0.80 M and pH 7.23 for backward extraction, fulfill the conditions to obtain activity recovery of lipase ≥78% and purification factor of lipase ≥4.0. The study demonstrated that response surface methodology can be used for optimization of the conditions for reverse micellar extraction of lipase.     

Use of reverse micellar systems for the extraction and purification of bromelain from pineapple wastes

Reverse micellar systems of CTAB/isooctane/hexanol/butanol and AOT/isooctane are used for the extraction and primary purification of bromelain from crude aqueous extract of pineapple wastes (core, peel, crown and extended stem). The effect of forward as well as back extraction process parameters on the extraction efficiency, activity recovery and purification fold is studied in detail for the pineapple core extract. The optimized conditions for the extraction from core resulted in forward and back extraction efficiencies of 45% and 62%, respectively, using reverse micellar system of cationic surfactant CTAB. A fairly good activity recovery (106%) and purification (5.2-fold) of bromelain is obtained under these conditions. Reverse micellar extraction from peel, extended stem and crown using CTAB system resulted in purification folds of 2.1, 3.5, and 1.7, respectively. Extraction from extended stem using anionic surfactant AOT in isooctane did not yield good results under the operating conditions employed.     

Process optimization for reverse micellar extraction of stem bromelain with a focus on back extraction

In the current study, reverse micellar extraction (RME) for the purification of stem bromelain was successfully achieved using the sodium bis(2‐ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate (AOT)/isooctane system. A maximum forward extraction efficiency of 58.0% was obtained at 100 mM AOT concentration, aqueous phase pH of 8.0 and 0.2 M NaCl. Back extraction studies on altering stripping phase pH and KCl concentration, addition of counter‐ion and iso‐propyl alcohol (IPA) and mechanical agitation with glass beads indicated that IPA addition and agitation with glass beads have significant effects on extraction efficiency. The protein extraction was higher (51.9%) in case of the IPA (10% v/v) added system during back extraction as compared to a cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (100 mM) added system (9.42%). The central composite design technique was used to optimize the back extraction conditions further. Concentration of IPA, amount of glass beads, mixing time, and agitation speed (in rpm) were the variables selected. IPA concentration of 8.5% (v/v), glass bead concentration of 0.6 (w/v), and mixing time of 45 min at 400 rpm resulted in higher back extraction efficiency of 45.6% and activity recovery of 88.8% with purification of 3.04‐fold. The study indicated that mechanical agitation using glass beads could be used for destabilizing the reverse micelles and release of bromelain back into the fresh aqueous phase. © 2014 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 30:845–855, 2014     

Reverse micellar extraction of papain with cationic detergent based system: An optimization approach

In this study, reverse micellar extraction of papain model system was performed using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)/iso-octane/hexanol/butanol system to optimize the forward and back extraction efficiency (BEE). A maximum forward extraction efficiency of 55.0, 61.0, and 54% was achieved with an aqueous phase pH of 11.0, 150?mM CTAB/iso-octane and 0.1?M NaCl, respectively. Taguchi’s orthogonal array was applied to optimize the pH of stripping phase, concentration of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and potassium chloride (KCl) for maximizing BEE. The optimal levels of stripping phase pH, concentration of IPA and KCl were found to be 6, 20% (v/v), and 0.8?M, respectively. Under these optimal levels, the BEE was found to be 88% after which enzyme activity was recovered with 2.5-fold purification. Further optimization was performed using artificial neural network-linked genetic algorithm, where the BEE was improved to 90.52% with pH 6, IPA (%)?=?19.938, and KCl (M)?=?0.729.     

Protein extraction by reverse micelles: a study of the factors affecting the forward and backward transfer of alpha-chymotrypsin and its activity

alpha-chymotrypsin is taken as a model protein to investigate three aspects of the protein extraction by reverse micelles: (1) the comparison between the two forward transfer techniques, i.e., the liquid-liquid and the solid state-liquid transfer; (2)the back-transfer, i.e., the capability of the protein to be recovered from the micellar solution; and (3) the maintainance of the enzyme activity at the end of the extraction cycle. Concerning the forward transfer from the liquid phase, we study first the effect of salt initially present in the aqueous phase on the equilibrium concentration of the extracted species; further, we study the forward protein extraction from the solid state, and the effect of pH, salt, and protein concentration on the transfer efficiency. Concerning the back transfer, we find the somewhat surprising result, that the percentage of protein back-extraction depends on the type and concentration of salt used for the forward transfer. Preliminary data concerning an alternative method for the back-transfer using silica gel to liberate the protein from the micellar environment, are presented. Finally, it is found that the enzyme activity depends again on the type and concentration of salt used for the forward transfer.     

Reverse micellar extraction for downstream processing of lipase: Effect of various parameters on extraction

Reverse micellar extraction of lipase using cationic surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) was investigated. The effect of various process parameters on both forward and backward extraction of lipase from crude extract was studied to optimize its yield and purity. Forward extraction of lipase was found to be maximum using Tris buffer at pH 9.0 containing 0.10 M NaCl in aqueous phase and 0.20 M CTAB in organic phase consisting of isooctane, butanol and hexanol. In case of backward extraction, lipase was extracted from the organic phase to a fresh aqueous phase in 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 1.0 M KCl. The activity recovery, extraction efficiency and purification factor of lipase were found to be 82.72%, 40.27% and 4.09-fold, respectively. The studies also indicated that the organic phase recovered after back extraction could be reused for the extraction of lipase from crude extract.     

Backward extraction of reverse micellar encapsulated proteins using a counterionic surfactant

The back-extraction of proteins encapsulated in AOT reverse micelles was performed by adding a counterionic surfactant, either TOMAC or DTAB. This novel backward transfer method gave higher backward extraction yields compared to the conventional method with high salt and high pH of the aqueous stripping solution. The protein activity was maintained in the resulting aqueous phase, which in this case had a near neutral pH and low salt concentration. A sharp decrease of the water content was observed in the organic phase corresponding to protein back-extraction using TOMAC. The backward transfer mechanism was postulated to be caused by electrostatic interaction between oppositely charged surfactant molecules, which lead to the collapse of the reverse micelles. The back-extraction process with TOMAC was found to be very fast; more than 100 times faster than back-extraction with the conventional method, and as much as 3 times faster than forward extraction. The formation of 1:1 complexes of AOT and TOMAC in the solvent phase was observed, and these hydrophobic complexes could be efficiently removed from the solvent using adsorption onto Montmorillonite in order for the organic solvent to be reused. A second cationic surfactant, DTAB, confirmed the general applicability of counterionic surfactants for the backward transfer of proteins.     

Extraction of monoclonal antibodies (IgG1) using anionic and anionic/nonionic reverse micelles

Purification schemes for antibody production based on affinity chromatography are trying to keep pace with increases in cell culture expression levels and many current research initiatives are focused on finding alternatives to chromatography for the purification of Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). In this article, we have investigated an alternative separation technique based on liquid–liquid extraction called the reverse micellar extraction. We extracted MAb (IgG1) using reverse micelles of an anionic surfactant, sodium bis 2‐ethyl‐hexyl sulfosuccinate (AOT) and a combination of anionic (AOT) and nonionic surfactants (Brij‐30, Tween‐85, Span‐85) using isooctane as the solvent system. The extraction efficiency of IgG1 was studied by varying parameters, such as pH of the aqueous phase, cation concentration, and type and surfactant concentration. Using the AOT/Isooctane reverse micellar system, we could achieve good overall extraction of IgG1 (between 80 and 90%), but only 30% of the bioactivity of IgG1 could be recovered at the end of the extraction by using its binding to affinity chromatography columns as a surrogate measure of activity. As anionic surfactants were suspected as being one of the reasons for the reduced activity, we decided to combine a nonionic surfactant with an anionic surfactant and then study its effect on the extraction efficiency and bioactivity. The best results were obtained using an AOT/Brij‐30/Isooctane reverse micellar system, which gave an overall extraction above 90 and 59% overall activity recovery. An AOT/Tween‐85/Isooctane reverse micellar system gave an overall extraction of between 75 and 80% and overall activity recovery of around 40–45%. The results showed that the activity recovery of IgG1 can be significantly enhanced using different surfactant combination systems, and if the recovery of IgG1 can be further enhanced, the technique shows considerable promise for the downstream purification of MAbs. © 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 2010     

Affinity extraction of BSA with reversed micellar system composed of unbound Cibacron Blue

Affinity Cibacron Blue 3GA (CB) dye in aqueous phase was directly transferred to the reversed micelles due to electrostatic interaction between anionic CB and cationic cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). The bovine serum albumin (BSA) transfer to the reverse micelles increases significantly in a wide range of pH by the addition of a small amount of CB ( approximately 1.0-7.0% of the total surfactant concentration) to the aqueous phase. For pH < pI, the selectivity can be significantly improved with the presence of affinity CB because no BSA was extracted in the absence of CB. For backward extraction of BSA from the micellar phase with stripping aqueous solution, the addition of 2-propanol to the aqueous phase can recover almost all BSA (98.5%) extracted into the reverse micelles.     

Protein extraction using the sodium bis(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate (NaDEHP) reverse micellar system

The reverse micellar system of sodium bis(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate (NaDEHP)/isooctane/brine was used for liquid-liquid extraction of proteins. We investigated the solubilization of cytochrome-c and alpha-chymotrypsin into the NaDEHP reverse micellar phase by varying the pH and NaCl concentration in the aqueous phase. At neutral pH and relatively low ionic strength, the proteins are extracted into the micellar phase with high yield. By contacting the micellar phase with a divalent cation (e.g., Ca(2+)) aqueous solution, the reverse micelles are destabilized and release the protein molecules back into an aqueous solution for recovery. This method separates the proteins from the surfactant with very high overall efficiencies. (c) 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Reverse micelles in protein separation: the use of silica for the back-transfer process

In order to use reverse micellar solutions successfully for the separation of proteins, good methods are needed to recover the biomolecules into an aqueous environment after solubilization into organic micellar media. Usually the recovery is accomplished by equilibrating the protein-loaded reverse micellar solution with a water phase containing an appropriate salt (back-transfer). In this article we describe an alternative "back extraction" procedure which is based on the addition of silica to the protein-containing reverse micellar solution. In this way, the water is stripped from the reverse micellar solution. [i.e., bis(2-ethylhexyl) sodium sulfosuccinate (AOT)/isooctane/water] and the proteins adsorb to the silica particles. The adsorption process is shown to be practically quantitative. The subsequent recovery of the proteins form the silica into an aqueous solution turns out to be most efficient at alkaline pH (pH 8); 60-80 of the total protein (alpha-chymotrypsin or trypsin) could be recovered. The specific enzyme activity at the end of the whole cycle can be as high as 80-100%. The procedure is applied also for the back extraction from micellar solutions in which, instead of AOT, a biocompatible surfactant such as a synthetic short-chain lecithin was used. It is shown that the recovery of a alpha-chymotrypsin and trypsin is also achievable under these conditions in quite good yield and under good maintenance of the enzyme's catalytic activity. (c) 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Application of reverse micelle extraction process for amylase recovery using response surface methodology

The effect of different process variables of reverse micelle extraction process like pH, addition of surfactant (AOT) concentration and potassium chloride (KCl) concentration on amylase recovery has been studied and analysed. Solid-state fermentation was used for the production of amylase enzyme. Response surface methodology (RSM) using central composite rotatable design (CCRD) was employed to analyse and optimize the enzyme extraction process. The regression analysis indicates that the effect of AOT concentration, and KCl concentration were significant, whereas the effect of pH was non-significant on enzyme recovery. For the maximum recovery of enzyme, the optimum operating condition for pH, AOT concentration (M) and KCl concentration were 10.43, 0.05 and 1.00, respectively. Under these optimal conditions, the enzyme recovery was 83.16%.     

Purification of glucose oxidase from Aspergillus niger by liquid-liquid cationic reversed micelles extraction

The aim of this work was to select the operating conditions for the extraction and recovery of glucose oxidase (GOX) by reversed micelles from mixtures of commercial enzyme and Aspergillus niger homogenates. For this purpose, the influence of the main operating parameters (pH, surfactant concentration, and presence of cell debris or not) on GOX extraction was investigated at 25 degrees C. Without cell debris, the highest yield of GOX activity recovery (90.8%) was obtained performing (a) the forward extraction in isooctane as solvent and hexanol and butanol as cosolvents at 76/6/18 ratio, pH 7.0, 0.2 M cetyl trimethylammonium bromide as cationic surfactant, and electric conductivity of 5.0 mS cm(-1) and (b) the backward extraction at pH 5.5. Forward and backward extractions furnished comparable results when using raw homogenate, which demonstrates a negligible impact of the presence of cell debris on the process. The highest extraction yield (94%) was obtained under the same forward and backward conditions adopted without cell debris. The promising results of this work suggest that the proposed methodology could be profitably exploited at an industrial level.     

反胶束萃取技术分离胰激肽原酶

研究了用十六烷基三甲基溴化铵（CTAB）/正己醇/正辛烷反胶束溶液萃取和反萃取商业用胰激肽原酶时,水相pH值、离子强度和种类、CTAB浓度和助表面活性剂浓度等因素对分离效率的影响,并从反胶束微观结构给予解释。结果表明：［CTAB］＝0.02 mol•L-1,正己醇／正辛烷(V/V)＝1：5,萃取pH＝9.0,反萃pH＝7.0,萃取［KBr］＝0.1 mol•L-1,反萃［KBr］＝1.5 mol•L-1,反萃取加15％乙醇(V/V)时,萃取率接近100%,反萃取活性回收得率在80%以上。商业用酶的纯化倍数最高为1.97倍,粗酶为7.15倍,且粗酶纯化后比活在200U／mg以上,电泳分析证实了纯化效果,显示了很好的工业前景。     

AOT/异辛烷反胶束萃取纯化胰蛋白酶及酶变性失活问题的解决

用反胶束技术分离纯化蛋白质,具有高选择性、易于大规模操作等优点,具有良好的工业应用前景。但是离子型表面活性剂形成的反胶束体系萃取蛋白质容易引起蛋白质的变性,这是由于离子型表面活性剂的强电荷作用所导致的。对用AOT/异辛烷反胶束体系从胰酶粗提物中萃取胰蛋白酶进行了研究,通过在反胶束相加入乙醇,解决了反胶束萃取蛋白质时蛋白质变性失活的问题。并且由于乙醇的加入大大减少了分相的时间,简化了实验步骤,优化了实验方法,使此技术在工业上的大规模应用成为可能。通过优化各种实验条件,胰蛋白酶的前萃取率达到90%,反萃取率接近100%。最终得率为88%。纯化后的比活提高了5倍多,从300U/mg左右提高到了1800U/mg。     

Separation and purification of periplasmic cytochrome c553 using reversed micelles

Surfactant concentration, ionic strength, and pH were optimised for the selective separation and purification of periplasmic cytochrome c553 from recombinant E. coli TG2 cells using response surface methodology. Back-extraction was accomplished using counter-ionic surfactant addition. Optimum forward extraction conditions were: 65 mM bis(2-ethylhexyl)sulfosuccinate sodium salt (AOT), 0.07 M NaCl, and pH 8.4, while the optimum back-extraction conditions were 80 mM trioctylmethylammonium chloride, 0.85 M KCl, and pH 9.62. In comparison to a conventionally purified sample using column chromatography (10 mg cytochrome c553 l–1 with a purity of 0.66), reverse micelles achieved the same concentration and similar purity (0.50) in only two simple steps.     

Recovery of lactoferrin and lactoperoxidase from sweet whey using colloidal gas aphrons (CGAs) generated from an anionic surfactant, AOT

The recovery of lactoferrin and lactoperoxidase from sweet whey was studied using colloidal gas aphrons (CGAs), which are surfactant-stabilized microbubbles (10-100 microm). CGAs are generated by intense stirring (8000 rpm for 10 min) of the anionic surfactant AOT (sodium bis-2-ethylhexyl sulfosuccinate). A volume of CGAs (10-30 mL) is mixed with a given volume of whey (1-10 mL), and the mixture is allowed to separate into two phases: the aphron (top) phase and the liquid (bottom) phase. Each of the phases is analyzed by SDS-PAGE and surfactant colorimetric assay. A statistical experimental design has been developed to assess the effect of different process parameters including pH, ionic strength, the concentration of surfactant in the CGAs generating solution, the volume of CGAs and the volume of whey on separation efficiency. As expected pH, ionic strength and the volume of whey (i.e. the amount of total protein in the starting material) are the main factors influencing the partitioning of the Lf.Lp fraction into the aphron phase. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that best separation performance was achieved at pH = 4 and ionic strength = 0.1 mol/L i.e., with conditions favoring electrostatic interactions between target proteins and CGAs (recovery was 90% and the concentration of lactoferrin and lactoperoxidase in the aphron phase was 25 times higher than that in the liquid phase), whereas conditions favoring hydrophobic interactions (pH close to pI and high ionic strength) led to lower performance. However, under these conditions, as confirmed by zeta potential measurements, the adsorption of both target proteins and contaminant proteins is favored. Thus, low selectivity is achieved at all of the studied conditions. These results confirm the initial hypothesis that CGAs act as ion exchangers and that the selectivity of the process can be manipulated by changing main operating parameters such as type of surfactant, pH and ionic strength.