植物与病原微生物互作分子基础的研究进展

植物在与病原微生物共同进化过程中形成了复杂的免疫防卫体系。植物的先天免疫系统可大致分为两个层面。第一个层面的免疫基于细胞表面的模式识别受体对病原物相关分子模式的识别,该免疫过程被称为病原物相关分子模式触发的免疫(PAMP-triggered immunity,PTI),能帮助植物抵抗大部分病原微生物;第二个层面的免疫起始于细胞内部,主要依靠抗病基因编码的蛋白产物直接或间接识别病原微生物分泌的效应子并且激发防卫反应,来抵抗那些能够利用效应子抑制第一层面免疫的病原微生物,这一过程被称为效应子触发的免疫(Effector-triggered immunity,ETI)。这两个层面的免疫都是基于植物对"自我"及"非我"的识别,依靠MAPK级联等信号网络,将识别结果传递到细胞核内,调控相应基因的表达,做出适当的免疫应答。本文着重阐述了植物与病原微生物互作过程中不同层面的免疫反应所发生主要事件的分子基础及研究进展。     

植物与病原微生物互作分子基础的研究进展

植物在与病原微生物共同进化过程中形成了复杂的免疫防卫体系。植物的先天免疫系统可大致分为两个层面。第一个层面的免疫基于细胞表面的模式识别受体对病原物相关分子模式的识别, 该免疫过程被称为病原物相关分子模式触发的免疫(PAMP-triggered immunity, PTI), 能帮助植物抵抗大部分病原微生物; 第二个层面的免疫起始于细胞内部, 主要依靠抗病基因编码的蛋白产物直接或间接识别病原微生物分泌的效应子并且激发防卫反应, 来抵抗那些能够利用效应子抑制第一层面免疫的病原微生物, 这一过程被称为效应子触发的免疫(Effector-triggered immunity, ETI)。这两个层面的免疫都是基于植物对“自我”及“非我”的识别, 依靠MAPK级联等信号网络, 将识别结果传递到细胞核内, 调控相应基因的表达, 做出适当的免疫应答。本文着重阐述了植物与病原微生物互作过程中不同层面的免疫反应所发生主要事件的分子基础及研究进展。     

无脊椎动物先天免疫模式识别受体研究进展

免疫系统的基本功能是“自己”与“非己”识别.对入侵物的识别是免疫防御的起始,最终引发效应物反应系统,包括吞噬作用、包被作用、激活蛋白酶级联反应和黑化作用以及诱导抗菌肽的合成等,从而清除或消灭入侵物.研究证明,这种“非己”识别是因为存在某些特异性的、可溶的或与细胞膜结合的模式识别受体,可以识别或结合微生物表面保守的、而在宿主中又不存在的病原相关分子模式.模式识别受体通过对病原相关分子的识别启动先天免疫防御.近年来这方面的研究进展很快,已经在无脊椎动物中确定了多种模式识别受体,包括肽聚糖识别蛋白、含硫酯键蛋白、革兰氏阴性菌结合蛋白、清除受体、C型凝集素、硫依赖型凝集素、Toll样受体和血素等,并对其性质和功能进行了研究.     

革兰阴性菌结合蛋白(Toll/GNBPs)和肽聚糖识别蛋白(PGRPs)在无脊椎动物先天免疫应答中的作用

由于无脊椎动物没有专一的特异性免疫系统,所以先天免疫系统是其抵御外来病原入侵的唯一方式,无脊椎动物的先天免疫系统包括细胞和体液防卫机制,这2种机制可被模式识别受体(PRR s)分子所触发,PRR s可与微生物表面特异的物质识别并结合,通过结合,这些PRR s通过包囊和噬菌作用直接杀死微生物,或者通过丝氨酸蛋白酶级联反应和细胞内免疫信号途径间接引发不同的防御反应以抵御病原微生物。革兰阴性菌结合蛋白(GNBPs)和肽聚糖识别蛋白(PGRPs)作为无脊椎动物先天免疫系统中的一类重要模式识别受体,在识别微生物病原并引发一系列级联反应做出免疫应答过程中起重要作用。本文主要对GNBPs和PGRPs在无脊椎动物中的研究进展及其在先天免疫应答过程中的作用机制进行综述。     

植物抗病蛋白研究进展

为了应对外界复杂的环境变化, 植物进化出一套复杂而精细的免疫应答调控机制。植物抗病蛋白能够特异地识别病原微生物分泌的效应蛋白, 触发免疫响应以对抗病原微生物的侵扰。该文综述了植物抗病蛋白的结构与功能及对病原菌的识别方式、在免疫响应过程中抗病蛋白的动态平衡机制及其介导的防御反应信号转导。开展植物抗病蛋白研究可为定向培育抗病作物奠定理论基础。     

植物NLR免疫受体的识别、免疫激活与信号调控

高等植物进化出大量膜表面和胞内免疫受体以感知各种病原信号, 抵御病原物入侵。其中, 细胞表面的模式识别受体感知模式分子后激活基础免疫反应, 核苷酸结合和富亮氨酸重复蛋白(NLRs)则通过感知病原微生物分泌的效应蛋白激活特异免疫反应, 导致超敏反应与细胞死亡。该文主要综述了NLRs对效应蛋白的识别、植物免疫激活及下游信号调控的最新研究进展。     

TANK结合激酶1在固有免疫应答中的作用及其泛素化调控

固有免疫系统通过模式识别受体识别病原微生物表面的病原相关分子模式启动固有免疫反应,经级联信号转导,激活下游转录因子NF-κB和干扰素调节因子IRFs,进而产生炎性细胞因子以及Ⅰ型干扰素,抵抗病原微生物感染。TANK结合激酶1 (TANK binding kinase 1,TBK1) 作为一个中心节点蛋白,参与多条固有免疫信号通路的传导,可同时激活NF-κB和IRFs,是机体抗感染过程中关键的蛋白激酶。TBK1的精准调控对维持机体免疫稳态、抵抗病原体入侵至关重要。文中综述了TBK1在固有免疫应答中的作用及其泛素化调控机制,以期为病原体感染及自身免疫病的临床治疗提供理论基础。     

《Molecular Plant》文章中文摘要 2010年第3卷第5期

（http：//mplant.oxfordjournals.org/content/vol3/issue5/index.dtl）1 Zhang J,Zhou JM（2010）.Plant immumty triggered by microbial molecular signatures.Mol Plant,3（5）：783～793题目：微生物分子特征激活的植物免疫（综述）摘要：病原体/微生物相关分子模式（pathogen/microbe-associated molecular patterns,PAMPs/MAMPs）被位于宿主细胞表面的模式识别受体（pattern-recognition receptors,PRRs）识别来激活植物免疫。病原相关分子模式诱导的免疫反应（PAMP-triggered immunity,PTI）是植物限制病原菌增殖的第一层防卫反应。PTI信号传导元件往往被多种Pseudomonas syringae毒性效应蛋白作为攻击靶点,     

RXLR效应分子抑制植物免疫机制研究进展

植物病原卵菌是一类农业生产上为害巨大的病原物,其分泌大量的RXLR效应分子进入寄主植物细胞并干扰植物免疫系统,以协助病原菌成功侵染。尽管有一小部分RXLR效应分子会被植物识别成为无毒蛋白,但大部分RXLR效应分子则会逃避识别和抑制植物免疫。随着高通量测序和蛋白互作技术的广泛应用,大量RXLR效应分子干扰植物免疫的分子机制已经被揭示。本文综述了RXLR效应分子操纵植物免疫系统的分子策略,探讨了RXLR效应分子与植物免疫互作的研究方向和应用前景。     

TLR4信号通路介导病毒性急性肺损伤与ARDS的研究进展

Toll样受体(Toll-like receptors,TLR)是参与非特异性免疫的Ⅰ型跨膜蛋白分子,可识别病原相关分子模式(Pathogen-associated molecular patterns,PAMP)并在病原体侵入体内的早期阶段激活机体的免疫应答,在响应宿主细胞对微生物病原体的识别中起重要作用,是机体抵抗感染疾病的重要屏障.以流感病毒和冠状病毒为代表的呼吸道病毒感染在临床具有极高的发病率和死亡率.此类病毒感染细胞后可通过模式识别受体和病原体相关分子模式相互作用激活宿主的先天免疫系统,诱发宿主产生过激的炎症反应从而引发"细胞因子风暴",最终导致急性肺损伤与急性呼吸窘迫综合症而致人死亡.因此,本文就Toll样受体家族中的Toll样受体4介导的信号通路为对象,就其介导的信号通路在流感病毒与冠状病毒复制及其在导致病毒性急性肺损伤与ARDS形成中的作用及靶向抑制该通路治疗病毒性肺炎的研究进展作一综述,以供同行参考.     

植物核质运输与其先天免疫研究进展

植物为了抵御病原菌的侵染而进化出一套独特的先天免疫系统,它主要通过定位在细胞膜或细胞质上的受体介导并激活下游抗病基因表达而实现,但在这些信号传递过程中,细胞质的信号向核传递需要核质运输相关元件的参与。虽然目前只有个别核质运输的信号元件被证实参与了植物的先天免疫信号传递过程,但越来越多的研究表明核质运输是连接抗病基因表达和信号识别受体的一个主要方式。研究发现,病原菌的效应因子也可以利用植物核质运输机制侵入到宿主细胞核内,调控敏感基因的表达,干扰植物的免疫反应。该文对近年来国内外有关植物的核质运输机制、各层次免疫反应需要核质运输作用、核质运输相关蛋白在免疫反应中的作用等方面对核质运输参与植物先天免疫反应研究的研究进展进行综述,并指出该领域未来研究的主要内容和方向。     

Review of innate and specific immunity in plants and animals

Innate immunity represents a trait common to plants and animals, based on the recognition of pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by the host pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). It is generally assumed that a pathogen strain, or race, may have elaborated mechanisms to suppress, or evade, the PAMP-triggered immunity. Once this plan was successful, the colonization would have been counteracted by an adaptive strategy that a plant cultivar must have evolved as a second line of defence. In this co-evolutionary context, adaptive immunity and host resistance (cultivar-pathogen race/strain-specific) has been differently selected, in animals and plants respectively, to face specialized pathogens. Notwithstanding, plant host resistance, based on matching between resistance (R) and avirulence (avr) genes, represents a form of innate immunity, being R proteins similar to PRRs, although able to recognize specific virulence factors (avr proteins) rather than PAMPs. Besides, despite the lack of adaptive immunity preserved plants from autoimmune disorders, inappropriate plant immune responses may occur, producing some side-effects, in terms of fitness costs of induced resistance and autotoxicity. A set of similar defence responses shared from plants and animals, such as defensins, reactive oxygen species (ROS), oxylipins and programmed cell death (PCD) are briefly described.     

Toward understanding of rice innate immunity against Magnaporthe oryzae

The blast fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae, causes serious disease on a wide variety of grasses including rice, wheat and barley. The recognition of pathogens is an amazing ability of plants including strategies for displacing virulence effectors through the adaption of both conserved and variable pathogen elicitors. The pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) were reported as two main innate immune responses in plants, where PTI gives basal resistance and ETI confers durable resistance. The PTI consists of extracellular surface receptors that are able to recognize PAMPs. PAMPs detect microbial features such as fungal chitin that complete a vital function during the organism’s life. In contrast, ETI is mediated by intracellular receptor molecules containing nucleotide-binding (NB) and leucine rich repeat (LRR) domains that specifically recognize effector proteins produced by the pathogen. To enhance crop resistance, understanding the host resistance mechanisms against pathogen infection strategies and having a deeper knowledge of innate immunity system are essential. This review summarizes the recent advances on the molecular mechanism of innate immunity systems of rice against M. oryzae. The discussion will be centered on the latest success reported in plant–pathogen interactions and integrated defense responses in rice.     

病原菌保守性特征分子及其介导的植物抗病性

每种病原菌都有一些保守的特征性分子,也称病原菌相关分子模式(PAMPs)。植物细胞表面的模式识别受体PRRs通过识别病原菌的PAMPs而激发免疫反应(PTI)。目前,已发现多种PRRs/PAMPs的识别模式,如拟南芥FLS2识别细菌鞭毛蛋白、拟南芥EFR识别细菌延长因子Tu(EF-Tu)、水稻CEBiP/CERK1识别真菌几丁质、水稻抗病蛋白XA21识别白叶枯病菌的硫化蛋白Ax21等。这些识别模式都能激发植物的基础免疫反应以抵抗病原菌的侵染。但是病原菌为了成功侵染寄主植物,也进化出一些致病机制,例如向植物细胞中注入毒性效应蛋白阻断PTI途径,或者产生一种"自我伪装"机制以逃避PRRs的识别。因此,研究者们根据PAMPs的结构特性对PRRs重新改造,以期使植物获得持久、广谱和高效的抗性。综述目前已知的PAMPs分子类型、PRRs/PAMPs的识别机制及改造后的新型PRRs,并分析PTI研究中存在的问题及其发展前景。     

Recent advances in plant immunity: recognition, signaling, response, and evolution

Innate immune system is employed by plants to defend against phytopathogenic microbes through specific perception of non-self molecules and subsequent initiation of resistance responses. Current researches elucidate that plants mostly rely on cell surface-located pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and intracellular nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat proteins (NB-LRRs) to recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and effector proteins from microbial pathogens, initiating PAMP- and effector-triggered immunity (PTI and ETI), respectively. Some pathogenic bacterial effector proteins are usually secreted into plant cells and play a virulence function by suppressing plant PTI, implying an evolutionary process of plant immunity from PTI to ETI. In the past several years, a great progress has been achieved to reveal fascinating molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenic recognition, resistance signaling transduction, and plant immunity evolution. Here, we summarized the latest breakthroughs about these topics, and offered an integral understanding of plant molecular immunity.     

R proteins as fundamentals of plant innate immunity

Plants are attacked by a wide spectrum of pathogens, being the targets of viruses, bacteria, fungi, protozoa, nematodes and insects. Over the course of their evolution, plants have developed numerous defense mechanisms including the chemical and physical barriers that are constitutive elements of plant cell responses locally and/or systemically. However, the modern approach in plant sciences focuses on the evolution and role of plant protein receptors corresponding to specific pathogen effectors. The recognition of an invader’s molecules could be in most cases a prerequisite sine qua non for plant survival. Although the predicted three-dimensional structure of plant resistance proteins (R) is based on research on their animal homologs, advanced technologies in molecular biology and bioinformatics tools enable the investigation or prediction of interaction mechanisms for specific receptors with pathogen effectors. Most of the identified R proteins belong to the NBS-LRR family. The presence of other domains (including the TIR domain) apart from NBS and LRR is fundamental for the classification of R proteins into subclasses. Recently discovered additional domains (e.g. WRKY) of R proteins allowed the examination of their localization in plant cells and the role they play in signal transduction during the plant resistance response to biotic stress factors. This review focuses on the current state of knowledge about the NBS-LRR family of plant R proteins: their structure, function and evolution, and the role they play in plant innate immunity.     

Roles of small RNAs in plant disease resistance

The interaction between plants and pathogens represents a dynamic competition between a robust immune system and efficient infectious strategies. Plant innate immunity is composed of complex and highly regulated molecular networks, which can be triggered by the perception of either conserved or race‐specific pathogenic molecular signatures. Small RNAs are emerging as versatile regulators of plant development, growth and response to biotic and abiotic stresses. They act in different tiers of plant immunity, including the pathogen‐associated molecular pattern‐triggered and the effector‐triggered immunity. On the other hand, pathogens have evolved effector molecules to suppress or hijack the host small RNA pathways. This leads to an arms race between plants and pathogens at the level of small RNA‐mediated defense.Here, we review recent advances in small RNA‐mediated defense responses and discuss the challenging questions in this area.     

Fungal Pathogens: The Battle for Plant Infection

The attempted infection of a plant by a pathogen, such as a fungus or an Oomycete, may be regarded as a battle whose major weapons are proteins and smaller chemical compounds produced by both organisms. Indeed, plants produce an astonishing plethora of defense compounds that are still being discovered at a rapid pace. This pattern arose from a multi-million year, ping-pong?type co-evolution, in which plant and pathogen successively added new chemical weapons in this perpetual battle. As each defensive innovation was established in the host, new ways to circumvent it evolved in the pathogen. This complex co-evolution process probably explains not only the exquisite specificity observed between many pathogens and their hosts, but also the ineffectiveness or redundancy of some defensive genes which often encode enzymes with overlapping activities. Plants evolved a complex, multi-level series of structural and chemical barriers that are both constitutive or preformed and inducible. These defenses may involve strengthening of the cell wall, hypersensitive response (HR), oxidative burst, phytoalexins and pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins. The pathogen must successfully overcome these obstacles before it succeeds in causing disease. In some cases, it needs to modulate or modify plant cell metabolism to its own benefit and/or to abolish defense reactions. Central to the activation of plant responses is timely perception of the pathogen by the plant. A crucial role is played by elicitors which, depending on their mode of action, are broadly classified into nonspecific elicitors and highly specific elicitors or virulence effector/avirulence factors. A protein battle for penetration is then initiated, marking the pathogen attempted transition from extracellular to invasive growth before parasitism and disease can be established. Three major types of defense responses may be observed in plants: non-host resistance, host resistance, and host pathogenesis. Plant innate immunity may comprise a continuum from non-host resistance involving the detection of general elicitors to host-specific resistance involving detection of specific elicitors by R proteins. It was generally assumed that non-host resistance was based on passive mechanisms and that nonspecific rejection usually arose as a consequence of the non-host pathogen failure to breach the first lines of plant defense. However, recent evidence has blurred the clear-cut distinction among non-host resistance, host-specific resistance and disease. The same obstacles are also serious challenges for host pathogens, reducing their success rate significantly in causing disease. Indeed, even susceptible plants mount a (insufficient) defense response upon recognition of pathogen elicited molecular signals. Recent evidence suggests the occurrence of significant overlaps between the protein components and signalling pathways of these types of resistance, suggesting the existence of both shared and unique features for the three branches of plant innate immunity.