瘤胃甲烷菌及甲烷生成的调控

甲烷菌属于古细菌 ,参与有机物的厌氧降解 ,生成甲烷。反刍动物瘤胃内甲烷的生成损耗 2 %～ 12 %的饲料能量 ,并且通过嗳气排入大气。甲烷不仅是温室气体之一 ,而且还会破坏大气臭氧层。每年全球反刍动物排放大量的甲烷 ,减少瘤胃内甲烷的生成对提高饲料能量利用率和改善环境具有重要意义。近年来 ,有关瘤胃甲烷菌及甲烷生成调控的报道日益增多。概述甲烷菌的特性以及瘤胃内甲烷生成的途径 ,综述甲烷生成的调控手段 ,主要包括去原虫、日粮配合、添加电子受体、增加乙酸生成菌等方法     

瘤胃甲烷调控方法评述

反刍动物释放的甲烷不仅消耗6％～10％的能量摄入,而且是重要的温室效应气体。过去20多年以来,研究人员围绕瘤胃甲烷生成及其调控展开了大量的研究,目前采取的主要措施包括：（1）提供电子释放新途径;（2）利用疫苗、生物控制剂（噬菌体和细菌素）以及化学抑制剂等抑制产甲烷菌,以及（3）去原虫、添加植物提取物或有机酸等促进产乙酸菌增加,降低产甲烷菌可利用的氢。瘤胃生态系统是一个复杂的生态系统,能够将复杂碳水化合物转化成为挥发性脂肪酸,这个过程部分依赖于甲烷的生成和氢的消耗。因此,虽然各种调控措施能够在短期内抑制甲烷生成,但瘤胃微生态系统能够恢复原有的甲烷生成水平,这表明我们对瘤胃中氢代谢仍然认识不足。进一步提高对瘤胃内氢和甲烷生成的微生物生化机制的了解,有助于我们找到有效的甲烷调控措施。     

体外添加不同水平的亚麻籽油对气体产量、瘤胃发酵及脂肪酸组分的影响

利用瘤胃体外产气法研究在羊草底物条件下添加不同水平的亚麻籽油(LSO)对气体产量、瘤胃发酵和脂肪酸组分的影响。LSO添加水平分别为底物干物质的5%和10%,体外培养持续48 h。在12、24和48 h时测量总气体产量、甲烷及氢气产量,培养结束后测定发酵指标和发酵液中脂肪酸成分。结果表明,LSO显著降低了产气量和甲烷产量,提高了氢气产量;添加LSO显著提高了总挥发性脂肪酸含量、丙酸和丁酸的比例,还显著降低了发酵液pH和氨氮浓度;同时,添加LSO提高了发酵液中对人体健康有益的共轭亚油酸以及其他不饱和脂肪酸的比例。这些结果表明,富含十八碳不饱和脂肪酸的LSO可以在粗饲料条件下抑制甲烷生成,改善瘤胃发酵,增加了多不饱和脂肪酸的含量,而且抑制甲烷生成及改善瘤胃发酵的效果与添加剂量有关。     

奶牛瘤胃微生物研究进展和趋势

近年来在奶牛试验中,对瘤胃微生物的研究引起了人们越来越多的兴趣。这些研究的目的多是将微生物组成变化与日粮组成、宿主生产性能(如饲料效率,产奶量,乳脂等)、健康(如瘤胃酸中毒和亚急性酸中毒)以及环境(如甲烷排放)联系起来,另外还有一些研究则强调了微生物在多种反刍动物瘤胃发育中的作用。关于奶牛瘤胃微生物的大部分发现都是基于扩增子测序,可以揭示瘤胃微生物的分类组成,以及在不同处理条件下瘤胃菌群的变化。尽管新兴的宏基因组学和宏转录组学能够深入探索瘤胃微生物的功能,但在数据分析和解释方面也带来了更多的挑战,如目前大多数论文都严重依赖于相关性和推测分析。综述了奶牛瘤胃微生物研究的进展和局限,包括瘤胃微生物与产奶效率、甲烷排放以及瘤胃发育的关系,以及奶牛瘤胃微生物未来的研究趋势。     

瘤胃降解粗纤维产甲烷的厌氧真菌与甲烷菌共培养物的分离鉴定

【目的】本试验从瘤胃中分离鉴定降解粗纤维产甲烷的厌氧真菌与甲烷菌共培养物,为深入探究甲烷菌对厌氧真菌代谢途径的影响及相关调节机制奠定基础。【方法】利用厌氧滚管技术从荷斯坦奶牛瘤胃内容物中分离厌氧真菌与甲烷菌共培养物,通过形态学观察和DAPI染色以及甲烷菌16S rRNA基因序列分析方法分别对厌氧真菌及甲烷菌进行鉴定。【结果】从荷斯坦奶牛瘤胃中共分离到28株厌氧真菌与甲烷菌共培养物。共培养物中的厌氧真菌均为单中心菌株,分别属于Piromyces,Neocallimastix和Caeomyces属,所占百分比为53.57%,42.86%及3.57%。甲烷菌16S rRNA基因序列分析结果表明,共培养物中的甲烷菌均为甲烷短杆菌。本研究共获得四种不同的厌氧真菌与甲烷菌组合,分别为Piromyces/类Methanobrevibacter olleyae菌株,Neocallimastix/类Methanobrevibacter olleyae菌株,Neocallimastix/类Methanobrevibacter thaueri菌株及Caecomyces/类Methanobrevibacter olleyae菌株,分别占总数的53.57%,39.29%,3.57%及3.57%。【结论】分离得到的28株厌氧真菌和甲烷菌共培养物中,占优势的为具有丰富丝状假根的厌氧真菌Piromyces和Neocallimastix以及类Methanobrevibacter olleyae属的甲烷短杆菌。本研究为进一步研究瘤胃内厌氧真菌与甲烷菌相互代谢关系奠定基础。     

瘤胃甲烷菌第七目的研究进展

随着测序技术和体外培养技术的进步,越来越多的未知甲烷菌被发现。近年来,第七个甲烷菌目"Methanomassiliicoccales"(简称Mmc)被发现并建立。这一目甲烷菌在进化关系上与热原体古菌相近,但又存在较远距离,独立成簇。Mmc分布广泛,遍布哺乳动物和昆虫的消化道以及稻田、湿地等环境,但不同来源菌株表现出生境偏好性。Mmc缺少将CO2还原为甲基辅酶M的完整代谢途径,导致它们严格利用氢气还原甲基底物生成甲烷。全面深入地了解Mmc在反刍动物瘤胃中发挥的功能,将有助于新型高效反刍动物甲烷减排策略的提出。因此,本文主要综述了Mmc菌株的分离培养、生理生化和基因组特性及其在瘤胃甲烷生成中的作用。     

陆地生态系统甲烷产生和氧化过程的微生物机理

陆地生态系统存在许多常年性或季节性缺氧环境,如:湿地、水稻土、湖泊沉积物、动物瘤胃、垃圾填埋场和厌氧生物反应器等。每年有大量有机物质进入这些环境,在缺氧条件下发生厌氧分解。甲烷是有机质厌氧分解的最终产物。产生的甲烷气体可通过缺氧-有氧界面释放到大气,产生温室效应,是重要的温室气体。产甲烷过程是缺氧环境中有机质分解的核心环节,而甲烷氧化是缺氧-有氧界面的重要微生物过程。甲烷的产生和氧化过程共同调控大气甲烷浓度,是全球碳循环不可分割的组成部分。对陆地生态系统甲烷产生和氧化过程的微生物机理研究进展进行了概要回顾和综述。主要内容包括:新型产甲烷古菌即第六和第七目产甲烷古菌和嗜冷嗜酸产甲烷古菌的发现;短链脂肪酸中间产物互营氧化过程与直接种间电子传递机制;新型甲烷氧化菌包括厌氧甲烷氧化菌和疣微菌属好氧甲烷氧化菌的发现;甲烷氧化菌生理生态与环境适应的新机制。这些研究进展显著拓展了人们对陆地生态系统甲烷产生和氧化机理的认识和理解。随着新一代土壤微生物研究技术的发展与应用,甲烷产生和氧化微生物研究领域将面临更多机遇和挑战,对未来发展趋势做了展望。     

T-RFLP分析厌氧真菌传代频率对共存产甲烷菌菌群的影响

【目的】建立瘤胃产甲烷菌T-RFLP多样性分析方法,并研究厌氧真菌与产甲烷菌共培养液在不同时间传代对共存产甲烷菌菌群的影响。【方法】利用产甲烷菌mcrA基因特异性引物PCR扩增后,选择合适内切酶对扩增产物进行内切,分析内切后末端片段长度多态性,测定共培养液在不同传代频率时共存产甲烷菌多样性的变化。【结果】利用Msp I内切酶分析发现,末端片段长度约为470 bp的产甲烷菌为共培养液中的优势甲烷菌,共培养液传代至第15代时,片段长度约为130 bp和200 bp的产甲烷菌也成为共培养中的优势菌株;比较发现,Taq I能更好地内切共培养液中甲烷菌mcrA基因序列,瘤胃内容物及3 d传代共培养液中产甲烷菌主要为末端片段长度约为70、100、200、270、300、330和470 bp的菌株,共培养液在体外传代培养过程中,末端片段长度约为70、100、270和470 bp的产甲烷菌变化更为显著。Taq I比较分析不同传代频率(3、5和7 d)对共培养液中产甲烷菌菌群结构的影响表明,3 d传代的共培养液中产甲烷菌菌群与瘤胃内容物较为相似,而5 d和7 d传代的共培养液中产甲烷菌菌群间差异较小,但与瘤胃内容物差异较大,导致不同传代频率的共培养液中产甲烷菌菌群间显著差异的最主要菌株为末端片段长度约为100 bp的产甲烷菌,其次为末端片段长度约为70 bp和270 bp的产甲烷菌。【结论】利用建立的快速可行的瘤胃产甲烷菌T-RFLP方法分析表明,传代频率显著影响厌氧真菌与产甲烷菌共培养液中产甲烷菌的菌群结构,3 d传代共培养液内产甲烷菌菌群与瘤胃内容物更相似。     

高原湿地产甲烷菌

<正>甲烷是仅次于二氧化碳的温室气体,单分子甲烷的温室效应作用是二氧化碳的25倍[1],对全球气候变暖有显著影响,同时还影响对流层以及平流层的臭氧浓度[2]。地球上的甲烷主要由湿地、反刍动物瘤胃等生境中的产甲烷菌产生。我国是湿地分布面积较大的国家,仅次于加拿大和俄罗斯,居世界第3位,且具有独特的高原湿地。     

微生态制剂与反刍动物甲烷减排

反刍动物瘤胃中产甲烷菌可以利用氢气、甲醇和甲胺等物质生成甲烷,不仅造成饲料能量的浪费,同时甲烷作为一种主要的温室气体也对环境构成了严重的威胁。因此,众多学者都在寻找降低反刍动物甲烷排放的方法,其中有学者提出在饲粮中添加适量可直接饲喂的微生物(Direct-fed microbes,DFM)是一种很有潜力的方法,但目前还处于初步探索阶段。本文综述了几种重要的DFM,并介绍了其作用机制及应用效果。     

Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants

Ruminant production is under increased public scrutiny in terms of the importance of cattle and other ruminants as major producers of the greenhouse gas methane. Methanogenesis is performed by methanogenic archaea, a specialised group of microbes present in several anaerobic environments including the rumen. In the rumen, methanogens utilise predominantly H2 and CO2 as substrates to produce methane, filling an important functional niche in the ecosystem. However, in addition to methanogens, other microbes also have an influence on methane production either because they are involved in hydrogen (H2) metabolism or because they affect the numbers of methanogens or other members of the microbiota. This study explores the relationship between some of these microbes and methanogenesis and highlights some functional groups that could play a role in decreasing methane emissions. Dihydrogen ('H2' from this point on) is the key element that drives methane production in the rumen. Among H2 producers, protozoa have a prominent position, which is strengthened by their close physical association with methanogens, which favours H2 transfer from one to the other. A strong positive interaction was found between protozoal numbers and methane emissions, and because this group is possibly not essential for rumen function, protozoa might be a target for methane mitigation. An important function that is associated with production of H2 is the degradation of fibrous plant material. However, not all members of the rumen fibrolytic community produce H2. Increasing the proportion of non-H2 producing fibrolytic microorganisms might decrease methane production without affecting forage degradability. Alternative pathways that use electron acceptors other than CO2 to oxidise H2 also exist in the rumen. Bacteria with this type of metabolism normally occupy a distinct ecological niche and are not dominant members of the microbiota; however, their numbers can increase if the right potential electron acceptor is present in the diet. Nitrate is an alternative electron sinks that can promote the growth of particular bacteria able to compete with methanogens. Because of the toxicity of the intermediate product, nitrite, the use of nitrate has not been fully explored, but in adapted animals, nitrite does not accumulate and nitrate supplementation may be an alternative under some dietary conditions that deserves to be further studied. In conclusion, methanogens in the rumen co-exist with other microbes, which have contrasting activities. A better understanding of these populations and the pathways that compete with methanogenesis may provide novel targets for emissions abatement in ruminant production.     

The effect of dietary concentrate and soya oil inclusion on microbial diversity in the rumen of cattle

Aims: Methane emissions from ruminants are a significant contributor to global greenhouse gas production. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of diet on microbial communities in the rumen of steers. Methods and Results: The effects of dietary alteration (50 : 50 vs 90 : 10 concentrate–forage ratio, and inclusion of soya oil) on methanogenic and bacterial communities in the rumen of steers were examined using molecular fingerprinting techniques (T‐RFLP and automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis) and real‐time PCR. Bacterial diversity was greatly affected by diet, whereas methanogen diversity was not. However, methanogen abundance was significantly reduced (P = 0·009) in high concentrate–forage diets and in the presence of soya oil (6%). In a parallel study, reduced methane emissions were observed with these diets. Conclusions: The greater effect of dietary alteration on bacterial community in the rumen compared with the methanogen community may reflect the impact of substrate availability on the rumen bacterial community. This resulted in altered rumen volatile fatty acid profiles and had a downstream effect on methanogen abundance, but not diversity. Significance and Impact of the Study: Understanding how rumen microbial communities contribute to methane production and how these microbes are influenced by diet is essential for the rational design of methane mitigation strategies from livestock.     

Effect of coconut oil and defaunation treatment on methanogenesis in sheep

The present study was conducted to evaluate in vivo the role of rumen ciliate protozoa with respect to the methane-suppressing effect of coconut oil. Three sheep were subjected to a 2 x 2 factorial design comprising two types of dietary lipids (50 g x kg(-1) coconut oil vs. 50 g x kg(-1) rumen-protected fat) and defaunation treatment (with vs. without). Due to the defaunation treatment, which reduced the rumen ciliate protozoa population by 94% on average, total tract fibre degradation was reduced but not the methane production. Feeding coconut oil significantly reduced daily methane release without negatively affecting the total tract nutrient digestion. Compared with the rumen-protected fat diet, coconut oil did not alter the energy retention of the animals. There was no interaction between coconut oil feeding and defaunation treatment in methane production. An interaction occurred in the concentration of methanogens in the rumen fluid, with the significantly highest values occurring when the animals received the coconut oil diet and were subjected to the defaunation treatment. Possible explanations for the apparent inconsistency between the amount of methane produced and the concentration of methane-producing microbes are discussed. Generally, the present data illustrate that a depression of the concentration of ciliate protozoa or methanogens in rumen fluid cannot be used as a reliable indicator for the success of a strategy to mitigate methane emission in vivo. The methane-suppressing effect of coconut oil seems to be mediated through a changed metabolic activity and/or composition of the rumen methanogenic population.     

Methane oxidation and its coupled electron-sink reactions in ruminal fluid

AIMS: This study was conducted to investigate the occurrence of methane oxidation in the rumen, and to identify the electron-sink reaction coupled to the oxidation if it occurred. METHODS AND RESULTS: Mixed ruminal microbes taken from sheep were incubated with 13CH4. Oxidation of methane, estimated from the flux of 13C to CO2 and microbial cells, occurred, but represented only 0.2-0.5% of the methane produced. Methane oxidation was suppressed by the presence of oxygen, and was also inhibited by 2-bromoethane-sulphonate, and molybdate, but not by tungstate. CONCLUSION, SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Methane could be oxidized anaerobically in the rumen by reverse methanogenesis in consort with sulphate reduction.     

Formate as an Intermediate in the Bovine Rumen Fermentation

An average of 11 (range, 2 to 47) mumoles of formate per g per hr was produced and used in whole bovine rumen contents incubated in vitro, as calculated from the product of the specific turnover rate constant, k, times the concentration of intercellular formate. The latter varied between 5 and 26 (average, 12) nmoles/g. The concentration of formate in the total rumen contents was as much as 1,000 times greater, presumably owing to formate within the microbial cells. The concentration of formate in rumen contents minus most of the plant solids was varied, and from the rates of methanogenesis the Michaelis constant, K(m), for formate conversion to CH(4) was estimated at 30 nmoles/g. Also, the dissolved H(2) was measured in relation to methane production, and a K(m) of 1 nmole/g was obtained. A pure culture of Methanobacterium ruminantium showed a K(m) of 1 nmole of H(2)/g, but the K(m) for formate was much higher than the 30 nmoles for the rumen contents. It is concluded that nonmethanogenic microbes metabolize intercellular formate in the rumen. CO(2) and H(2) are the principal substrates for rumen methanogenesis. Eighteen per cent of the rumen methane is derived from formate, as calculated from the intercellular concentration of hydrogen and formate in the rumen, the Michaelis constants for conversion of these substrates by rumen liquid, and the relative capacities of whole rumen contents to ferment these substrates.     

Pure culture studies of inhibitors for methanogenic bacteria

Methane production in pure cultures ofMethanobacterium ruminantium andMethanobacterium M.o.H. strains is inhibited by halogenated methane analogues in Μm concentrations and by unsaturated long-chain fatty acids or sulfite inmm concentrations. With the long-chain fatty acids a free carboxyl group is required for the depressing effect on methanogenesis, while the toxicity is increased with a higher degree of unsaturation of these acids. The direct toxic effect of these compounds on methane bacteria in pure cultures is in accord with earlier observations regarding their effect on the mixed rumen microbes.     

The effect of plant alkaloids on in vitro rumen microbial fermentation

Crude alkaloid extracts from green Italian Ryegrass differed from those extracted from the ensiled grass with particular respect to the perloline moiety. Free perloline and crude alkaloid extracts from both silage and grass inhibited the production of volatile fatty acids in the fermentation of glucose by rumen microbes. With silage as fermentation substrate alkaloid extracts from silage and from grass (0.200 mg/l) caused a decrease in both substrate utilization ( P< < 0.01) and proportion of methane in the gas phase ( P< < 0.01). Molar proportions of acetate were also significantly decreased ( P < 0.01) with a corresponding increase in the proportion of propionate ( P < 0.01). These effects were not observed when grass nuts were used as the fermentation substrate. The results suggest that it is not the alkaloids per se that affect rumen microbial metabolism.     

Conversion of choline methyl groups through trimethylamine into methane in the rumen.

1. Choline methyl groups were rapidly metabolized to trimethylamine by rumen micro-organisms. 2. Trimethylamine was further metabolized to methane, but this system was more easily saturated by an excess of substrate, so that trimethylamine accumulated in the rumen of the fed animal. 3. Although trimethylamine was the only intermediate isolated in the conversion of the methyl groups of choline into methane, methylamine also served as a substrate for methane production. 4. The methyl group of methionine was also converted into methane by rumen fluid, but the methyl groups of carnitine were not.     

Factors affecting rumen methanogens and methane mitigation strategies

The rumen is a highly diverse ecosystem comprising different microbial groups including methanogens that consume a considerable part of the ruminant’s nutrient energy in methane production. The consequences of methanogenesis in the rumen may result in the low productivity and possibly will have a negative impact on the sustainability of the ruminant’s production. Since enteric fermentation emission is one of the major sources of methane and is influenced by a number of environmental factors, diet being the most significant one, a number of in vitro and in vivo trials have been conducted with different feed supplements (halogenated methane analogues, bacteriocins, propionate enhancers, acetogens, fats etc.) for mitigating methane emissions directly or indirectly, yet extensive research is required before reaching a realistic solution. Keeping this in view, the present article aimed to cover comprehensively the different aspects of rumen methanogenesis such as the phylogeny of methanogens, their microbial ecology, factors affecting methane emission, mitigation strategies and need for further study.