Gonadotropin secretion in ovariectomized ewes: effect of passive immunization against gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and infusion of a GnRH agonist and estradiol

Gonadotropin secretion was examined in ovariectomized sheep after passive immunization against gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). Infusion of ovine anti-GnRH serum, but not control antiserum, rapidly depressed serum concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH). The anti-GnRH-induced reduction in serum LH was reversed by circhoral (hourly) administration of a GnRH agonist that did not cross-react with the anti-GnRH serum. In contrast, passive immunization against GnRH led to only a modest reduction in serum concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Pulsatile delivery of the GnRH agonist did not influence serum concentrations of FSH. Continuous infusion of estradiol inhibited and then stimulated gonadotropin secretion in animals passively immunized against GnRH, with gonadotrope function driven by GnRH agonist. However, the magnitude of the positive feedback response was only 10% of the response noted in controls. These data indicate that the estradiol-induced surge of LH secretion in ovariectomized sheep is the product of estrogenic action at both hypothalamic and pituitary loci. Replacement of the endogenous GnRH pulse generator with an exogenous generator of GnRH-like pulses that were invariant in frequency and amplitude could not fully reestablish the preovulatory-like surge of LH induced by estradiol.     

Responses of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone levels to exogenous gonadotropin-releasing hormone during the estrogen-induced LH surge in the ovariectomized rhesus monkey

Experiments were performed to study the responsiveness of the pituitary to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) during the dynamic changes in gonadotropin secretion associated with the estrogen-induced luteinizing hormone (LH) surge in the ovariectomized (OVX) rhesus monkey. Silastic capsules filled with estradiol-17-beta were implanted subcutaneously in ovariectomized rhesus monkeys, resulting in an initial lowering of circulating LH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations followed by an LH-FSH surge. GnRH was injected intravenously just before estrogen implantation, during the negative feedback response and during the rising, the peak, and the declining phases of the LH surge. The LH and FSH responses during the negative feedback phase were as large as those before estrogen treatment (control responses). During the rising phase of the LH surge, the acute response to GnRH injection did not differ significantly from the control response, but the responses 60 and 120 min after injection were somewhat increased. During the declining phase of the LH surge, the pituitary was not responsive to exogenous GnRH, although LH probably continued to be secreted at this time since the LH surge decreased more slowly than predicted by the normal rate of disappearance of LH in the monkey. We conclude that an increased duration of response to GnRH may be an important part of the mechanism by which estrogen induces the LH surge, but we do not see evidence of increased sensitivity of the pituitary to GnRH as an acute releasing factor at that time.     

Effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse-frequency modulation on luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and testosterone secretion in hypothalamo/pituitary-disconnected rams

The effects of changes in pulse frequency of exogenously infused gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) were investigated in 6 adult surgically hypothalamo/pituitary-disconnected (HPD) gonadal-intact rams. Ten-minute sampling in 16 normal animals prior to HPD showed endogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) pulses occurring every 2.3 h with a mean pulse amplitude of 1.11 +/- 0.06 (SEM) ng/ml. Mean testosterone and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations were 3.0 +/- 0.14 ng/ml and 0.85 +/- 0.10 ng/ml, respectively. Before HPD, increasing single doses of GnRH (50-500 ng) elicited a dose-dependent rise of LH, 50 ng producing a response of similar amplitude to those of spontaneous LH pulses. The effects of varying the pulse frequency of a 100-ng GnRH dose weekly was investigated in 6 HPD animals; the pulse intervals explored were those at 1, 2, and 4 h. The pulsatile GnRH treatment was commenced 2-6 days after HPD when plasma testosterone concentrations were in the castrate range (less than 0.5 ng/ml) in all animals. Pulsatile LH and testosterone secretion was reestablished in all animals in the first 7 days by 2-h GnRH pulses, but the maximal pulse amplitudes of both hormones were only 50 and 62%, respectively, of endogenous pulses in the pre-HPD state. The plasma FSH pattern was nonpulsatile and FSH concentrations gradually increased in the first 7 days, although not to the pre-HPD range. Increasing GnRH pulse frequency from 2- to 1-hour immediately increased the LH baseline and pulse amplitude. As testosterone concentrations increased, the LH responses declined in a reciprocal fashion between Days 2 and 7. FSH concentration decreased gradually over the 7 days at the 1-h pulse frequency. Slowing the GnRH pulse to a 4-h frequency produced a progressive fall in testosterone concentrations, even though LH baselines were unchanged and LH pulse amplitudes increased transiently. FSH concentrations were unaltered during the 4-h regime. These results show that 1) the pulsatile pattern of LH and testosterone secretion in HPD rams can be reestablished by exogenous GnRH, 2) the magnitude of LH, FSH, and testosterone secretion were not fully restored to pre-HPD levels by the GnRH dose of 100 ng per pulse, and 3) changes in GnRH pulse frequency alone can influence both gonadotropin and testosterone secretion in the HPD model.     

Neuroendocrine dysfunction in polycystic ovary syndrome

Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a common disorder characterized by ovulatory dysfunction and hyperandrogenemia (HA). Neuroendocrine abnormalities including increased gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse frequency, increased luteinizing hormone (LH) pulsatility, and relatively decreased follicle stimulating hormone contribute to its pathogenesis. HA reduces inhibition of GnRH pulse frequency by progesterone, causing rapid LH pulse secretion and increasing ovarian androgen production. The origins of persistently rapid GnRH secretion are unknown but appear to evolve during puberty. Obese girls are at risk for HA and develop increased LH pulse frequency with elevated mean LH by late puberty. However, even early pubertal girls with HA have increased LH pulsatility and enhanced daytime LH pulse secretion, indicating the abnormalities may begin early in puberty. Decreasing sensitivity to progesterone may regulate normal maturation of LH secretion, potentially related to normally increasing levels of testosterone during puberty. This change in sensitivity may become exaggerated in girls with HA. Many girls with HA-especially those with hyperinsulinemia-do not exhibit normal LH pulse sensitivity to progesterone inhibition. Thus, HA may adversely affect LH pulse regulation during pubertal maturation leading to persistent HA and the development of PCOS.     

Decline in circulating estradiol during the periovulatory period is correlated with decreases in estradiol and androgen, and in messenger RNA for p450 aromatase and p450 17alpha-hydroxylase, in bovine preovulatory follicles

The preovulatory surge of gonadotropins induces meiotic maturation of the oocyte, the follicular/luteal phase shift in hormone production, and ovulation. This complex and rapid series of developmental changes is difficult to study in large mammals, such as primates and ruminants, because variability in the length of individual reproductive cycles makes it virtually impossible to predict the time of the LH surge. We have validated an experimental model for inducing the LH surge and ovulation in cattle and used it to study the sequence of changes in hormone secretion and some of the mechanisms of these changes. Luteolysis and a follicular phase were induced by injection of prostaglandin F(2alpha); injection of a GnRH analogue 36 h later induced an LH surge and ovulation. The LH surge peaked 2 h after GnRH and ovulation followed 22-31 h after the surge, consistent with the periovulatory interval in natural cycles. The ensuing luteal phase was normal, both in length and in concentrations of circulating progesterone. In experiment I, the uteroovarian effluent was collected, via cannulation of the vena cava, at frequent intervals relative to GnRH injection. Circulating estradiol declined progressively after GnRH, reaching a nadir by 8-10 h before ovulation, whereas concentrations of androstenedione and testosterone remained constant. In experiment II, preovulatory follicles were obtained at 0, 3.5, 6, 12, 18, or 24 h after GNRH: Concentrations of androgens and estradiol were measured in follicular fluid and medium from cultures of follicle wall (theca + granulosa cells); steady-state levels of mRNA for 17alpha-hydroxylase (17alphaOH) and P450 aromatase were measured in follicular tissue. Shortly after the LH surge (3.5 h post-GnRH) there was an acute increase in the capacity of follicular tissue to secrete androstenedione, but not estradiol, in vitro. Thereafter, both androgens and estradiol declined, both in follicular fluid and in medium collected from cultures of follicle wall. Levels of mRNA for 17alphaOH and aromatase in follicle wall decreased significantly by 6 h after GnRH, suggesting that declining levels of these enzymes underlie the decreases in steroid production by follicular cells. These results show that in cattle the preovulatory decrease in follicular estradiol production is mediated by redundant mechanisms, because androgen production and the capacity of granulosa cells to convert androgens to estradiol decline coordinately, in concert with decreases in mRNA for 17alphaOH and P450 aromatase.     

Does the seasonal increase in estradiol negative feedback prevent luteinizing hormone surges in anestrous ewes by suppressing hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse frequency?

To test the hypothesis that the anestrous increase in estradiol negative feedback prevents estrous cycles by suppressing hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse frequency, a variety of regimens of increasing GnRH pulse frequency were administered to anestrous ewes for 3 days. A luteinizing hormone (LH) surge was induced in 45 of 46 ewes regardless of amplitude or frequency of GnRH pulses, but only 19 had luteal phases. Estradiol administration induced LH surges in 6 of 6 ewes, only 3 having luteal phases. Anestrous luteal phase progesterone profiles were similar in incidence, time course, and amplitude to those of the first luteal phases of the breeding season, which in turn had lower progesterone maxima than late breeding season luteal phases. In the remaining ewes, progesterone increased briefly or not at all, the increases being similar to the transient rises in progesterone occurring in most ewes at the onset of the breeding season. These results demonstrate that increasing GnRH pulse frequency induces LH surges in anestrus and that the subsequent events are similar to those at the beginning of the breeding season. Finally, they support the hypothesis that the negative feedback action of estradiol prevents cycles in anestrus by suppressing the frequency of the hypothalamic pulse generator.     

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone at estrus: luteinizing hormone, estradiol, and progesterone during the periestrual and postinsemination periods in dairy cattle

Administering gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) improved conception rates in our previous studies. Our objective was to determine if the effect of GnRH was mediated through serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and/or by altered secretion of serum progesterone (P) and estradiol-17 beta (E) during the periestrual and post-insemination periods. Cattle were given either GnRH (n = 54) or saline (n = 55) at 72 h and inseminated artificially (AI) 80 h after the second of two injections of either prostaglandin F2 alpha or its analog, cloprostenol. Progesterone and E were measured in blood serum collected during 3 wk after AI (estrus) from 60 females. Blood was collected for LH determinations via indwelling jugular cannulae from 14 cows and 11 heifers. Collections were taken every 4 h from 32 to 108 h after the second PGF injection (PGF-2) (periestrual period) and at more frequent intervals during 240 min after administration of GnRH (n = 18) or saline (n = 7). Ten females had a spontaneous preovulatory LH surge before GnRH treatment (GnRH-spontaneous), whereas GnRH induced the preovulatory LH surge in six females. A spontaneous LH surge appeared to be initiated in two heifers at or near the time of GnRH treatment (spontaneous and/or induced). The remaining seven cows had spontaneous LH surges with no subsequent change in LH after saline treatment. Serum P during the 21 days after estrus was lower (p less than 0.05) in both pregnant and nonpregnant (open) cattle treated previously with GnRH compared with saline. Serum P during the first week after estrus was greater (p less than 0.01) and increased (p less than 0.05) more rapidly in saline controls and in GnRH-spontaneous cattle than in those exhibiting GnRH-induced or GnRH-spontaneous and/or-induced surges of LH. Conception rate of cattle receiving GnRH was higher (p = 0.06) than that of saline-treated controls. These data suggest that GnRH treatment at insemination initiated the preovulatory LH surge in some cattle, but serum P in both pregnant and open cows was compromised during the luteal phase after GnRH treatment. Improved fertility may be associated with delayed or slowly rising concentrations of serum progesterone after ovulation.     

Neuroendocrine control of FSH secretion: IV. Hypothalamic control of pituitary FSH-regulatory proteins and their relationship to changes in FSH synthesis and secretion

The current dogma is that the differential regulation of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) synthesis and secretion is modulated by gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse frequency and by changes in inhibins, activins, and follistatins both at the pituitary and at the peripheral level. To date no studies have looked at the overlapping function of these regulators in a combined setting. We tested the hypothesis that changes in GnRH pulse frequency alter the relative abundance of these regulators at the pituitary and peripheral levels in a manner consistent with changes in pituitary and circulating concentrations of FSH; that is, an increase in FSH will be accompanied by increased stimulatory input (activin) and/or reduced follistatin and inhibin. Ovariectomized ewes were subjected to a combination hypothalamic pituitary disconnection (HPD)-hypophyseal portal blood collection procedure. Hypophyseal portal and jugular blood samples were collected for a 6-h period from non-HPD ewes, HPD ewes, or HPD ewes administered GnRH hourly or every 3 h for 4 days. In the absence of endogenous hypothalamic and ovarian hormones that regulate gonadotropin secretion, 3-hourly pulses of GnRH increased pituitary content of FSH more than hourly GnRH, although these differences were not evident in the peripheral circulation. The results failed to support the hypothesis in that the preferential increase of pituitary content of FSH by the lower GnRH pulse frequency could be explained by changes in the pituitary content of inhibin A, follistatin, or activin B. Perhaps the effects of GnRH pulse frequency on FSH is due to changes in the balance of free versus bound amounts of these FSH regulatory proteins or to the involvement of other regulators not monitored in this study.     

A Mathematical Model for the Actions of Activin,Inhibin, and Follistatin on Pituitary Gonadotrophs

The timed secretion of the luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) from pituitary gonadotrophs during the estrous cycle is crucial for normal reproductive functioning. The release of LH and FSH is stimulated by gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) secreted by hypothalamic GnRH neurons. It is controlled by the frequency of the GnRH signal that varies during the estrous cycle. Curiously, the secretion of LH and FSH is differentially regulated by the frequency of GnRH pulses. LH secretion increases as the frequency increases within a physiological range, and FSH secretion shows a biphasic response, with a peak at a lower frequency. There is considerable experimental evidence that one key factor in these differential responses is the autocrine/paracrine actions of the pituitary polypeptides activin and follistatin. Based on these data, we develop a mathematical model that incorporates the dynamics of these polypeptides. We show that a model that incorporates the actions of activin and follistatin is sufficient to generate the differential responses of LH and FSH secretion to changes in the frequency of GnRH pulses. In addition, it shows that the actions of these polypeptides, along with the ovarian polypeptide inhibin and the estrogen-mediated variations in the frequency of GnRH pulses, are sufficient to account for the time courses of LH and FSH plasma levels during the rat estrous cycle. That is, a single peak of LH on the afternoon of proestrus and a double peak of FSH on proestrus and early estrus. We also use the model to identify which regulation pathways are indispensable for the differential regulation of LH and FSH and their time courses during the estrous cycle. We conclude that the actions of activin, inhibin, and follistatin are consistent with LH/FSH secretion patterns, and likely complement other factors in the production of the characteristic secretion patterns in female rats.     

Negative feedback as an obligatory antecedent to the estradiol-induced luteinizing hormone surge in ovariectomized pigs

In ovariectomized pigs, estradiol treatment induces a preovulatory-like luteinizing hormone (LH) surge, but only after serum LH concentrations are suppressed for 48 h. This inhibition of LH release is attributable in large part to inhibition of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) release. The present report examines the dependency of the estradiol-induced LH surge on this preceding phase of negative feedback. Ten ovariectomized gilts were given an i.m. injection of estradiol benzoate (10 micrograms/kg BW). Beginning at the time of estradiol treatment, 5 of these gilts received 1-microgram GnRH pulses i.v. every 45 min for 48 h, i.e. during the period of negative feedback. The remaining 5 control gilts received comparable infusions of vehicle. Estradiol induced the characteristic biphasic LH response in control gilts. On the other hand, the inhibitory LH response to estradiol was prevented and the ensuing LH surge was blocked in 4 of the 5 gilts given GnRH pulses during the negative feedback phase. These results indicate that suppressing release of GnRH and/or LH is an important antecedent to full expression of the LH surge in ovariectomized pigs. Assimilation of this observation with the existing literature provides novel insights into the neuroendocrine control of LH secretion in castrated and ovary-intact gilts.     

Changes in episodic luteinizing hormone secretion leading to puberty in the lamb

In this study, we monitored episodic luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion throughout development in eight April-born ewe lambs to determine if a change in LH pulse patterns preceded first ovulation at puberty. LH pulses were measured in samples collected every 12 min for 6 h once in July, twice a month from 22 August to 2 October, and then weekly until puberty. Progesterone concentrations, measured in samples taken 3/wk, were used as an index of first ovulation, which occurred at 29.3 +/- 0.7 wk of age. LH pulse frequencies throughout most of this period ranged from 0 to 2 pulses/6 h, with no change over time. However, during the week prior to the first progesterone rise, there was a significant increase in pulse frequency to a level seen during the follicular phase in post-pubertal lambs. This increase in pulse frequency was evident in 7 of 8 lambs; pulses were not analyzed in the last lamb because samples were taken during the LH surge. In contrast, LH pulse amplitude did not increase prior to puberty. In fact, pulse amplitude declined linearly during the 3 wk before first ovulation and then increased during the follicular phase in post-pubertal animals. These results support the hypothesis that an increase in the frequency of episodic LH secretion is a key event leading to the onset of ovarian cycles in the lamb. Whether an increase in pulse amplitude is also necessary remains unclear. If so, it must occur just before the LH surge, since it was not detected in any samples taken before puberty in this study.     

Effects of season and testosterone treatment on gonadotrophin secretion and pituitary responsiveness to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone in castrated Romney and Poll Dorset rams.

In castrated rams (Romney and Poll Dorset, n = 8 for each breed), inhibition by testosterone treatment (administered via Silastic capsules) of luteinizing hormone (LH) pulse frequency, basal and mean LH concentrations, mean follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentration, and the peak and total LH responses to exogenous gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) were significantly (P less than 0.01) greater during the nonbreeding than during the breeding season. Poll Dorset rams were less sensitive to testosterone treatment than Romney rams. In rams not receiving testosterone treatment, LH pulse frequency was significantly (P less than 0.05) lower during the nonbreeding season than during the breeding season in the Romneys (15.8 +/- 0.9 versus 12.0 +/- 0.4 pulses in 8 h), but not in the Poll Dorsets (13.6 +/- 1.2 versus 12.8 +/- 0.8 pulses in 8 h). It is concluded that, in rams, season influences gonadotrophin secretion through a steroid-independent effect (directly on hypothalamic GnRH secretion) and a steroid-dependent effect (indirectly on the sensitivity of the hypothalamo-pituitary axis to the negative feedback of testosterone). The magnitude of these effects appears to be related to the seasonality of the breed.     

A potential role of modulating inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor desensitization and recovery rates in regulating ovulation

Regulation of the human menstrual cycle is a frequency dependent process controlled in part by the pulsatile release of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) from the hypothalamus. The binding of GnRH to gonadotroph cells in the pituitary stimulates inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) mediated release of calcium from the endoplasmic reticulum, resulting in calcium oscillations and the secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH). A sudden increase in serum LH concentrations known as the LH surge triggers ovulation. Here we model the intracellular calcium dynamics of gonadotroph cells by adapting the model of Li and Rinzel (J. Theor. Biol. 166 (1994) 461) to include the desensitization of IP3 receptors to IP3. Allowing the resensitization rate of these receptors to vary over the course of the cycle suffices to explain the LH surge in both the normal menstrual cycle, and in the treatment of Kallmann's syndrome (a condition where endogenous production of GnRH is absent).     

Suppression of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist does not affect episodic progesterone secretion or corpus luteum function in ewes.

Progesterone secretion has been observed to be episodic in the late luteal phase of the oestrous cycle of ewes and is apparently independent of luteinizing hormone (LH). This study investigated the effects of suppressing the pulsatile release of LH in the early or late luteal phase on the episodic secretion of progesterone. Six Scottish Blackface ewes were treated i.m. with 1 mg kg-1 body weight of a potent gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist on either day 4 or day 11 of the luteal phase. Six ewes received saline at each time and acted as controls. Serial blood samples were collected at 10 or 15 min intervals between 0 and 8 h, 24 and 32 h, and 48 and 56 h after GnRH antagonist treatment and daily from oestrus (day 0) of the treatment cycle for 22 days. Oestrous behaviour was determined using a vasectomized ram present throughout the experiment. Progesterone secretion was episodic in both the early and late luteal phase with a frequency of between 1.6 and 3.2 pulses in 8 h. The GnRH antagonist abolished the pulsatile secretion and suppressed the basal concentrations of LH for at least 3 days after treatment. This suppression of LH, in either the early or late luteal phase, did not affect the episodic release of progesterone. Daily concentrations of progesterone in plasma showed a minimal reduction on days 11 to 14 after GnRH antagonist treatment on day 4, although this was significant (P < 0.05) only on days 11 and 13. There was no effect of treatment on day 11 on daily progesterone concentration, and the timing of luteolysis and the duration of corpus luteum function was unaffected by GnRH antagonist treatment on either day 4 or day 11. These results indicate that the episodic secretion of progesterone during the luteal phase of the oestrous cycle in ewes is independent of LH pulses and normal progesterone secretion by the corpus luteum can be maintained with minimal basal concentrations of LH.     

Effect of dexamethasone on secretion of luteinizing hormone and testosterone in the boar

Eight adult, Yorkshire-Landrace crossbred boars were used to evaluate the effects of the synthetic glucocorticoid, dexamethasone (DXM) on the secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone. Four treatments of 4 d each were administered: 1) 2 ml i.m. of 0.9% (w/v) NaCl solution (control); 2) DXM (2 ml i.m. as a dose of 50 mug/kg body weight, every 12 h); 3) DXM plus gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH; 50 mug in 1 ml i.m. every 6 h); 4) 2 ml NaCl solution i.m. plus a single dose of 50 mug i.v. GnRH. Blood samples were collected twice daily from an indwelling jugular vein catheter for 3 d and at 15 min intervals for 12 h on the fourth day. DXM treatment resulted in lower (P M0.01) testosterone values in samples collected twice daily. More frequent sampling on Day 4 revealed that DXM reduced (P<0.01) the number of pulsatile increases of LH in plasma, although the individual mean pulse areas did not fiffer between the NaCl- and DXM-treated groups. This was associated with a decreased pulse frequency of testosterone (P<0.05). GnRH plus DXM treatment caused a significant elevation (P<0.05) in mean values as well as in the mean pulse area and in the total of the individual pulse areas of LH. Pulse area and mean concentrations of testosterone were also increased (P<0.01) when GnRH was given concurrently with DXM. Comparison of a single injection of GnRH when NaCl was being administered (Treatment 4) to one of the injections of GnRH (Day 4, 0800 h, Treatment 3) revealed a subsequently greater (P<0.01) pulse area in LH above base-line during DXM treatment (7.67 +/- 1.17 ng/ml) than during the NaCl (4.17 +/- 0.73 ng/ml) treatment period. This was reflected in a greater (P<0.01) pulse increase of testosterone following the LH pulse in boars treated with DXM. It is concluded that DXM treatment in the boar can reduce the pulse frequency of LH secretion, presumably by affecting GnRH secretion, but it has less effect directly on pituitary LH synthesis and release.     

Peptides interact in gonadotrophin regulation

The regulation of luteinizing hormone (LH) activity is vital to normal reproductive functioning of the female. Although gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) has a prominent role in the regulation of LH it is now believed that other peptides are also involved. Among these peptides is oxytocin. The addition of oxytocin to cultures of pituitary cells from female rats elicited a concentration-dependent secretion of LH. This secretion was enhanced in an oestrogenised environment and was inhibited by progesterone and testosterone. Oxytocin administered to female rats at pro-oestrus advanced the endogenous LH surge that occurs on the evening of pro-oestrus. Conversely oxytocin receptor antagonist suppressed the production of the LH surge in a dose-dependent manner, indicating that endogenous oxytocin is a crucial component of LH regulation. In the human female, oxytocin administered during the late follicular phase advanced the onset of the midcycle LH surge. Oxytocin added to rat pituitary cells in vitro induced LH synthesis. Furthermore rats administered oxytocin on pro-oestrus had higher LH pituitary content following development of the LH surge than did rats administered saline. Thus oxytocin promoted synthesis and replacement in the pituitary of LH released into the circulation. Incubation of pituitary pieces with oxytocin plus GnRH induced secretion of amounts of LH greater than the sum of the amounts released by oxytocin and GnRH separately. Additionally the increased LH levels observed in the peripheral circulation of pentobarbitone-anaesthetised rats administered GnRH were enhanced if the rats received oxytocin prior to the GnRH. Thus oxytocin synergised with GnRH in stimulating LH release. Addition of diBucAMP reduced the oxytocin-mediated augmentation and dideoxyadenosine enhanced the augmentation, suggesting that oxytocin worked most efficiently in a milieu low in cAMP activity. The use of a cell immunoblot assay revealed that individual cells responded differently to oxytocin and to GnRH and that the two peptides could act on the same cell. Perifusion studies performed on hemipituitaries demonstrated that a LH response could be determined by the presence of three peptides, oxytocin, neuropeptide Y and GnRH. Hence oxytocin is potentially involved also in multiple interactions during the process of LH regulation. LH regulation is therefore apparently the result of a community of peptides acting in a co-operative network.     

Differential regulation of gonadotropin subunit messenger ribonucleic acids by gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse frequency in ewes

Changes in the frequency of GnRH and LH pulses have been shown to occur between the luteal and preovulatory periods in the ovine estrous cycle. We examined the effect of these different frequencies of GnRH pulses on pituitary concentrations of LH and FSH subunit mRNAs. Eighteen ovariectomized ewes were implanted with progesterone to eliminate endogenous GnRH release during the nonbreeding season. These animals then received 3 ng/kg body weight GnRH in frequencies of once every 4, 1, or 0.5 h for 4 days. These frequencies represent those observed during the luteal and follicular phases, and the preovulatory LH and FSH surge of the ovine estrous cycle, respectively. On day 4, the ewes were killed and their anterior pituitary glands were removed for measurements of pituitary LH, FSH, and their subunit mRNAs. Pituitary content of LH and FSH, as assessed by RIA, did not change (P greater than 0.10) in response to the three different GnRH pulse frequencies. However, subunit mRNA concentrations, assessed by solution hybridization assays and expressed as femtomoles per mg total RNA, did change as a result of different GnRH frequencies. alpha mRNA concentrations were higher (P less than 0.05) when the GnRH pulse frequency was 1/0.5 h and 1 h, whereas LH beta and FSH beta mRNA concentrations were maximal (P less than 0.05) only at a pulse frequency of 1/h. Additionally, pituitary LH and FSH secretory response to GnRH on day 4 was maximal (P = 0.05) when the pulse infusion was 1/h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of stress on reproduction in ewes

Stressors, such as poor body condition, adverse temperatures or even common management procedures (e.g., transport or shearing) suppress normal oestrus behaviour and reduce ewe fertility. All these events are co-ordinated by endocrine interactions, which are disrupted in stressful situations. This disruption is usually temporary in adult ewes, so that, when prevailing conditions improve, normal fertility would resume. Imposition of an experimental stressor (shearing, transport, isolation from other sheep, injection of endotoxin or insulin or cortisol infusion) suppresses GnRH/LH pulse frequency and amplitude. Part of the cause is at the pituitary, but effects on GnRH/LH pulse frequency and the GnRH/LH surge are mediated via the hypothalamus. It is not yet clear whether delays in the surge are caused by interruption of the oestradiol signal-reading phase, the signal transmission phase or GnRH surge release. Stressors also delay the onset of behaviour, sometimes distancing this from the onset of the pre-ovulatory LH surge. This could have deleterious consequences for fertility.     

Staurosporine enhances gonadotrophin-releasing hormone-stimulated luteinizing hormone secretion

In intact sheep gonadotropes, the protein kinase inhibitor, staurosporine, inhibited the stimulatory effect of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) on luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion. Under the same conditions staurosporine enhanced gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-stimulated LH exocytosis without altering the EC50 of GnRH and without affecting basal LH exocytosis. These results suggest that PKC does not play a major role in mediating acute GnRH-stimulated LH exocytosis. Furthermore, they demonstrate that staurosporine enhances GnRH stimulus-secretion coupling. Both extracellular Ca2(+)-dependent and Ca2(+)-independent components of GnRH-stimulated LH secretion were enhanced by the drug. Staurosporine had no effect on GnRH stimulation of cAMP and inositol phosphate synthesis. In permeabilized cells staurosporine did not enhance Ca2(+)- and cAMP-stimulated LH exocytosis. Based on these results we hypothesize that staurosporine inhibits a protein kinase which is activated by GnRH and which negatively modulates GnRH stimulus-secretion coupling.