Non-host defense response in a novel Arabidopsis-Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri pathosystem

Citrus canker, caused by Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri (Xcc), is one of the most destructive diseases of citrus. Progress of breeding citrus canker-resistant varieties is modest due to limited resistant germplasm resources and lack of candidate genes for genetic manipulation. The objective of this study is to establish a novel heterologous pathosystem between Xcc and the well-established model plant Arabidopsis thaliana for defense mechanism dissection and resistance gene identification. Our results indicate that Xcc bacteria neither grow nor decline in Arabidopsis, but induce multiple defense responses including callose deposition, reactive oxygen species and salicylic aicd (SA) production, and defense gene expression, indicating that Xcc activates non-host resistance in Arabidopsis. Moreover, Xcc-induced defense gene expression is suppressed or attenuated in several well-characterized SA signaling mutants including eds1, pad4, eds5, sid2, and npr1. Interestingly, resistance to Xcc is compromised only in eds1, pad4, and eds5, but not in sid2 and npr1. However, combining sid2 and npr1 in the sid2npr1 double mutant compromises resistance to Xcc, suggesting genetic interactions likely exist between SID2 and NPR1 in the non-host resistance against Xcc in Arabidopsis. These results demonstrate that the SA signaling pathway plays a critical role in regulating non-host defense against Xcc in Arabidopsis and suggest that the SA signaling pathway genes may hold great potential for breeding citrus canker-resistant varieties through modern gene transfer technology.     

Salicylic acid promotes autophagy via NPR3 and NPR4 in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Arabidopsis</Emphasis> senescence and innate immune response

In Arabidopsis thaliana, the non-expresser pathogenesis-related (NPR) multigene family members NPR1, NPR3, and NPR4 are necessary for salicylic acid (SA) perception. NPR3 and NPR4 are the CUL3 E3-ligase substrate adaptors allowing for the ubiquitination and turnover of NPR1 by the 26s proteasome. Concurrently, roots treated with the SA agonist benzothiadiazole accumulate autophagic bodies via NPR1-dependent signal pathway. However, the mechanisms by which NPR3 and NPR4 regulate autophagy remain unclear. In the present study, using single, double, and triple npr1-, npr3-, and npr4-null mutants and wild-type plants, the following results were obtained: (1) leaf senescence progressed faster in npr3/npr4 mutants than in wild type, suggesting that NPR3 and NPR4 negatively regulated leaf senescence. Moreover, npr3/npr4 promoted the expression of pathogenesis-related 1 (PR1) gene and enhanced resistance in response to avirulent pathogen infections suppressing cell death. Still, all mutants had similar SA levels, suggesting that NPR3 and NPR4 positive regulation of cell death and disease resistance was not associated with SA levels; (2) the number of autophagosomes, ATG7, and ATG8a-phosphatidylethanolamine and the concentration of free green-fluorescence protein were lower in npr3/npr4 mutants than in wild-type plants, indicating that NPR3 and NPR4 affected the two ubiquitination-like conjugation systems during the autophagosome formation and degradation of autophagic bodies.     

Salicylic acid binds NPR3 and NPR4 to regulate NPR1-dependent defense responses

Salicylic acid (SA) is widely recognized as a key player in plant immunity. While several proteins have been previously identified as the direct targets of SA, SA-mediated plant defense signaling mechanisms remain unclear. The Nature paper from Xinnian Dong''s group demonstrates that the NPR1 paralogues NPR3 and NPR4 directly bind SA, and this binding modulates their interaction with NPR1 and thereby degradation of this key positive regulator of SA-mediated defense, shedding important new insight into the mechanism(s) of SA-mediated, NPR1-dependent plant defense signal transduction.Salicylic Acid (SA) and its derivatives (e.g., aspirin) have long been recognized for their medicinal properties as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and as pain and fever relievers. An increasing number of studies show that SA also can delay and/or prevent the development of several cancers, cardiovascular diseases, and strokes^1,2. While several SA protein targets have been identified in mammalian cells¹, their molecular and physiological modes of action remain unclear. Thus, efforts to dissect SA''s mechanisms of action continue to rely on identifying additional protein targets. Indeed, SA was recently shown to bind and activate AMP-activated protein kinase, helping to explain some of its disease-preventing effects³.SA is naturally produced in plants, and it plays diverse roles in growth, development, and responses to abiotic stresses⁴. Additionally, SA is widely recognized as a key player in multiple layers of plant disease resistance, including basal resistance, effector-triggered immunity (ETI, also termed resistance gene-mediated resistance) and systemic acquired resistance (SAR)⁵. To decipher SA-mediated plant defense signaling mechanisms, several SA-binding proteins (SABPs) have been identified, including a catalase, cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase, chloroplastic carbonic anhydrase, and methyl salicylate esterase. Extensive study of the latter protein revealed its essential role in SAR⁵. However, despite identification of the aforementioned SABPs, SA''s signaling mechanisms remain unclear. Considering SA''s many roles in plants, these SABPs may constitute only a small portion of SA''s targets; moreover, the SA receptor remained to be found.In this context, the Nature paper from Xinnian Dong''s group⁶ represents a major step forward in our understanding of SA signaling mechanisms during plant-pathogen interactions. Dong''s group has been instrumental in characterizing the function of NPR1 (Nonexpresser of Pathogenesis-Related genes 1) in plant defense⁷. While NPR1 is a key player in one of the SA-mediated defense signaling pathways, it does not appear to be an SA receptor as it does not directly bind SA⁶. Instead, SA regulates the conversion of NPR1 from an oligomeric to a monomeric form, which leads to its nuclear translocation⁸. SA also regulates NPR1 phosphorylation, which facilitates NPR1''s recruitment to a Cullin3 (CUL3) E3 ligase and subsequently proteasome-mediated degradation⁹. Now Dong''s group has demonstrated that the NPR1 paralogues NPR3 and NPR4 are adaptor proteins for the CUL3 E3 ligase that specifically target NPR1 for degradation in an SA concentration-dependent manner⁶. Supporting their conclusion, NPR3 and NPR4 contain domains typically found in CUL3 substrate adaptors, and npr3/4 single and double mutants contain elevated levels of NPR1. Furthermore, NPR3 and NPR4 directly interact with NPR1. Strikingly, SA disrupts the NPR1-NPR4 interaction, thereby making NPR1 less susceptible to degradation, whereas SA promotes the NPR1-NPR3 interaction, which makes NPR1 more accessible for degradation (Figure 1). Since NPR4 has high affinity for SA (nanomolar range) while NPR3 has low affinity for SA (micromolar range), low SA levels should reduce NPR1 degradation, whereas high SA levels should enhance it.Open in a separate windowFigure 1NPR1 homeostasis is controlled by SA binding to NPR3/NPR4 in a concentration-dependent manner. At low SA levels (High Susceptibility, left), NPR1 is unavailable to induce defense gene since it is targeted through its binding to NPR4 for degradation in proteasomes. As SA concentration increases after infection (Basal Resistance, middle), SA binds to NPR4 disrupting its interaction with NPR1. Free NPR1 can now play its role in defense gene activation. At very high concentrations (ETI, right), SA levels are sufficient to bind to NPR3 and promote its interaction with NPR1, leading to NPR1 turnover.At the biological level, nuclear accumulation of NPR1 is required for basal defense gene expression, whereas proteasome-mediated turnover is required for ETI, and a combination of NPR1 accumulation and turnover is necessary for SAR development^6,9. The results presented by Fu et al.⁶ suggest that the interplay between NPR1, NPR3/4, and an SA concentration gradient finetunes NPR1 homeostasis and thus helps specify disease resistance. According to their working model, the enhanced susceptibility exhibited by SA-deficient plants is due to unrestricted NPR4 binding to NPR1, which depletes NPR1 due to CUL3^NPR4-mediated degradation⁶. In wild-type plants, low basal SA levels may bind to NPR4, thereby allowing some NPR1 to accumulate to confer basal resistance. Following pathogen infection, recognition of pathogen effectors by plant resistance proteins induces a high level of SA in local infected tissues; in this case, CUL3^NPR3-mediated degradation would allow fast NPR1 turnover, leading to ETI. In systemic tissues, an intermediate level of SA would enable both NPR1 accumulation and turnover, leading to SAR.Clearly, the study by Fu et al.⁶ represents a major step towards elucidating the mechanism(s) of SA perception in programming defense gene expression. However, NPR3 and NPR4 may not be SA receptors in a traditional sense. An increasing body of evidence indicates the existence of SA-dependent, but NPR1-independent defense signal transduction pathways¹⁰, in which NPR3/4 may not participate. In addition, it is unknown whether NPR3/NPR4-mediated SA perception is involved in the diverse roles that this hormone plays in growth and development, or in abiotic stress. Even for NPR1-dependent defense signal transduction, it is unclear whether NPR3/NPR4 are involved in SA''s ability to induce nuclear translocation of NPR1 and/or promote NPR1 phosphorylation to facilitate the proteasome-mediated turnover. Moreover, since SA binding did not affect the gel filtration elution profile of NPR4⁶, the mechanism through which SA binding influences the ability of NPR4 (or NPR3) to bind NPR1 is currently unknown. Thus, many aspects of SA-mediated signaling remain to be explored.     

Network Properties of Robust Immunity in Plants

Two modes of plant immunity against biotrophic pathogens, Effector Triggered Immunity (ETI) and Pattern-Triggered Immunity (PTI), are triggered by recognition of pathogen effectors and Microbe-Associated Molecular Patterns (MAMPs), respectively. Although the jasmonic acid (JA)/ethylene (ET) and salicylic acid (SA) signaling sectors are generally antagonistic and important for immunity against necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens, respectively, their precise roles and interactions in ETI and PTI have not been clear. We constructed an Arabidopsis dde2/ein2/pad4/sid2-quadruple mutant. DDE2, EIN2, and SID2 are essential components of the JA, ET, and SA sectors, respectively. The pad4 mutation affects the SA sector and a poorly characterized sector. Although the ETI triggered by the bacterial effector AvrRpt2 (AvrRpt2-ETI) and the PTI triggered by the bacterial MAMP flg22 (flg22-PTI) were largely intact in plants with mutations in any one of these genes, they were mostly abolished in the quadruple mutant. For the purposes of this study, AvrRpt2-ETI and flg22-PTI were measured as relative growth of Pseudomonas syringae bacteria within leaves. Immunity to the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Alternaria brassicicola was also severely compromised in the quadruple mutant. Quantitative measurements of the immunity levels in all combinatorial mutants and wild type allowed us to estimate the effects of the wild-type genes and their interactions on the immunity by fitting a mixed general linear model. This signaling allocation analysis showed that, contrary to current ideas, each of the JA, ET, and SA signaling sectors can positively contribute to immunity against both biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. The analysis also revealed that while flg22-PTI and AvrRpt2-ETI use a highly overlapping signaling network, the way they use the common network is very different: synergistic relationships among the signaling sectors are evident in PTI, which may amplify the signal; compensatory relationships among the sectors dominate in ETI, explaining the robustness of ETI against genetic and pathogenic perturbations.     

A recessive mutation in the Arabidopsis SSI2 gene confers SA- and NPR1-independent expression of PR genes and resistance against bacterial and oomycete pathogens

The Arabidopsis thaliana NPR1 gene is required for salicylic acid (SA)-induced expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes and systemic acquired resistance. However, loss-of-function mutations in NPR1 do not confer complete loss of PR gene expression or disease resistance. Thus these responses also can be activated via an NPR1-independent pathway that currently remain to be elucidated. The ssi2-1 mutant, identified in a genetic screen for suppressors of npr1-5, affects signaling through the NPR1-independent defense pathway(s). In comparison with the wild-type (SSI2 NPR1) plants and the npr1-5 mutant (SSI2 npr1-5), the ssi2-1 npr1-5 double mutant and the ssi2-1 NPR1 single mutant constitutively express PR genes [PR-1, BGL2 (PR-2) and PR-5]; accumulate elevated levels of SA; spontaneously develop lesions; and possess enhanced resistance to a virulent strain of Peronospora parasitica. The ssi2-1 mutation also confers enhanced resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst); however, this is accomplished primarily via an NPR1-dependent pathway. Analysis of ssi2-1 NPR1 nahG and ssi2-1 npr1-5 nahG plants revealed that elevated SA levels were not essential for the ssi2-1-conferred phenotypes. However, expression of the nahG transgene did reduce the intensity of some ssi2-1-conferred phenotypes, including PR-1 expression, and disease resistance. Based on these results, SSI2 or an SSI2-generated signal appears to modulate signaling of an SA-dependent, NPR1-independent defense pathway, or an SA- and NPR1-independent defense pathway.     

Uncoupling PR gene expression from NPR1 and bacterial resistance: characterization of the dominant Arabidopsis cpr6-1 mutant.

In Arabidopsis, NPR1 mediates the salicylic acid (SA)-induced expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes and systemic acquired resistance (SAR). Here, we report the identification of another component, CPR 6, that may function with NPR1 in regulating PR gene expression. The dominant CPR 6-1 mutant expresses the SA/NPR1-regulated PR genes (PR-1, BGL 2, and PR-5) and displays enhanced resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv maculicola ES4326 and Peronospora parasitica Noco2 in the absence of SAR induction. cpr 6-1-induced PR gene expression is not suppressed in the cpr 6-1 npr1-1 double mutant but is suppressed when SA is removed by salicylate hydroxylase. Thus, constitutive PR gene expression in cpr 6-1 requires SA but not NPR1. In addition, resistance to P. s. maculicola ES4326 is suppressed in the cpr 6-1 npr1-1 double mutant, despite expression of PR-1, BGL 2, and PR-5. Resistance to P. s. maculicola ES4326 must therefore be accomplished through unidentified antibacterial gene products that are regulated through NPR1. These results show that CPR 6 is an important regulator of multiple signal transduction pathways involved in plant defense.     

Dual Regulation of Gene Expression Mediated by Extended MAPK Activation and Salicylic Acid Contributes to Robust Innate Immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana

Network robustness is a crucial property of the plant immune signaling network because pathogens are under a strong selection pressure to perturb plant network components to dampen plant immune responses. Nevertheless, modulation of network robustness is an area of network biology that has rarely been explored. While two modes of plant immunity, Effector-Triggered Immunity (ETI) and Pattern-Triggered Immunity (PTI), extensively share signaling machinery, the network output is much more robust against perturbations during ETI than PTI, suggesting modulation of network robustness. Here, we report a molecular mechanism underlying the modulation of the network robustness in Arabidopsis thaliana. The salicylic acid (SA) signaling sector regulates a major portion of the plant immune response and is important in immunity against biotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens. In Arabidopsis, SA signaling was required for the proper regulation of the vast majority of SA-responsive genes during PTI. However, during ETI, regulation of most SA-responsive genes, including the canonical SA marker gene PR1, could be controlled by SA-independent mechanisms as well as by SA. The activation of the two immune-related MAPKs, MPK3 and MPK6, persisted for several hours during ETI but less than one hour during PTI. Sustained MAPK activation was sufficient to confer SA-independent regulation of most SA-responsive genes. Furthermore, the MPK3 and SA signaling sectors were compensatory to each other for inhibition of bacterial growth as well as for PR1 expression during ETI. These results indicate that the duration of the MAPK activation is a critical determinant for modulation of robustness of the immune signaling network. Our findings with the plant immune signaling network imply that the robustness level of a biological network can be modulated by the activities of network components.     

Characterization of plant immunity-activating mechanism by a pyrazole derivative

ABSTRACT

A newly identified chemical, 4-{3-[(3,5-dichloro-2-hydroxybenzylidene)amino]propyl}-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-5-one (BAPP) was characterized as a plant immunity activator. BAPP enhanced disease resistance in rice against rice blast disease and expression of a defense-related gene without growth inhibition. Moreover, BAPP was able to enhance disease resistance in dicotyledonous tomato and Arabidopsis plants against bacterial pathogen without growth inhibition, suggesting that BAPP could be a candidate as an effective plant activator. Analysis using Arabidopsis sid2-1 and npr1-2 mutants suggested that BAPP induced systemic acquired resistance (SAR) by stimulating between salicylic acid biosynthesis and NPR1, the SA receptor protein, in the SAR signaling pathway.     

Activation of an EDS1-mediated R-gene pathway in the snc1 mutant leads to constitutive, NPR1-independent pathogen resistance

The Arabidopsis NPR1 protein is an essential regulatory component of systemic acquired resistance (SAR). Mutations in the NPR1 gene completely block the induction of SAR by signals such as salicylic acid (SA). An Arabidopsis mutant, snc1 (suppressor of npr1-1, constitutive 1), was isolated in a screen for suppressors of npr1-1. In the npr1-1 background, the snc1 mutation resulted in constitutive resistance to Pseudomonas syringae maculicola ES4326 and Peronospora parasitica Noco2. High levels of SA were detected in the mutant and shown to be required for manifestation of the snc1 phenotype. The snc1 mutation was mapped to the RPP5 resistance (R) gene cluster and the eds1 mutation that blocks RPP5-mediated resistance suppressed snc1. These data suggest that a RPP5-related resistance pathway is activated constitutively in snc1. This pathway does not employ NPR1 but requires the signal molecule SA and the function of EDS1. Moreover, in snc1, constitutive resistance is conferred in the absence of cell death, which is often associated with R-gene mediated resistance.     

Dynamics of Defense Responses and Cell Fate Change during Arabidopsis-Pseudomonas syringae Interactions

Plant-pathogen interactions involve sophisticated action and counteraction strategies from both parties. Plants can recognize pathogen derived molecules, such as conserved pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and effector proteins, and subsequently activate PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI), respectively. However, pathogens can evade such recognitions and suppress host immunity with effectors, causing effector-triggered susceptibility (ETS). The differences among PTI, ETS, and ETI have not been completely understood. Toward a better understanding of PTI, ETS, and ETI, we systematically examined various defense-related phenotypes of Arabidopsis infected with different Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola ES4326 strains, using the virulence strain DG3 to induce ETS, the avirulence strain DG34 that expresses avrRpm1 (recognized by the resistance protein RPM1) to induce ETI, and HrcC^- that lacks the type three secretion system to activate PTI. We found that plants infected with different strains displayed dynamic differences in the accumulation of the defense signaling molecule salicylic acid, expression of the defense marker gene PR1, cell death formation, and accumulation/localization of the reactive oxygen species, H₂O₂. The differences between PTI, ETS, and ETI are dependent on the doses of the strains used. These data support the quantitative nature of PTI, ETS, and ETI and they also reveal qualitative differences between PTI, ETS, and ETI. Interestingly, we observed the induction of large cells in the infected leaves, most obviously with HrcC^- at later infection stages. The enlarged cells have increased DNA content, suggesting a possible activation of endoreplication. Consistent with strong induction of abnormal cell growth by HrcC^-, we found that the PTI elicitor flg22 also activates abnormal cell growth, depending on a functional flg22-receptor FLS2. Thus, our study has revealed a comprehensive picture of dynamic changes of defense phenotypes and cell fate determination during Arabidopsis-P. syringae interactions, contributing to a better understanding of plant defense mechanisms.     

Induction of resistance to Verticillium dahliae in Arabidopsis thaliana by the biocontrol agent K-165 and pathogenesis-related proteins gene expression

The biocontrol bacterium Paenibacillus alvei K165 has the ability to protect Arabidopsis thaliana against Verticillium dahliae. A direct antagonistic action of strain K165 against V. dahliae was ruled out, making it likely that K165-mediated protection results from induced systemic resistance (ISR) in the host. K165-mediated protection was tested in various Arabidopsis mutants and transgenic plants impaired in defense signaling pathways, including NahG (transgenic line degrading salicylic acid [SA]), etr1-1 (insensitive to ethylene), jar1-1 (insensitive to jasmonate), npr1-1 (nonexpressing NPR1 protein), pad3-1 (phytoalexin deficient), pad4-1 (phytoalexin deficient), eds5/sid1 (enhanced disease susceptibility), and sid2 (SA-induction deficient). ISR was blocked in Arabidopsis mutants npr1-1, eds5/sid1, and sid2, indicating that components of the pathway from isochorismate and a functional NPR1 play a crucial role in the K165-mediated ISR. Furthermore, the concomitant activation and increased transient accumulation of the PR-1, PR-2, and PR-5 genes were observed in the treatment in which both the inducing bacterial strain and the challenging pathogen were present in the rhizosphere of the A. thaliana plants.     

Evidence for an Important Role of WRKY DNA Binding Proteins in the Regulation of NPR1 Gene Expression

The Arabidopsis NPR1 gene is a positive regulator of inducible plant disease resistance. Expression of NPR1 is induced by pathogen infection or treatment with defense-inducing compounds such as salicylic acid (SA). Transgenic plants overexpressing NPR1 exhibit enhanced resistance to a broad spectrum of microbial pathogens, whereas plants underexpressing the gene are more susceptible to pathogen infection. These results suggest that regulation of NPR1 gene expression is important for the activation of plant defense responses. In the present study, we report the identification of W-box sequences in the promoter region of the NPR1 gene that are recognized specifically by SA-induced WRKY DNA binding proteins from Arabidopsis. Mutations in these W-box sequences abolished their recognition by WRKY DNA binding proteins, rendered the promoter unable to activate a downstream reporter gene, and compromised the ability of NPR1 to complement npr1 mutants for SA-induced defense gene expression and disease resistance. These results provide strong evidence that certain WRKY genes act upstream of NPR1 and positively regulate its expression during the activation of plant defense responses. Consistent with this model, we found that SA-induced expression of a number of WRKY genes was independent of NPR1.     

NPR1 modulates cross-talk between salicylate- and jasmonate-dependent defense pathways through a novel function in the cytosol

Plant defenses against pathogens and insects are regulated differentially by cross-communicating signal transduction pathways in which salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) play key roles. In this study, we investigated the molecular mechanism of the antagonistic effect of SA on JA signaling. Arabidopsis plants unable to accumulate SA produced 25-fold higher levels of JA and showed enhanced expression of the JA-responsive genes LOX2, PDF1.2, and VSP in response to infection by Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000, indicating that in wild-type plants, pathogen-induced SA accumulation is associated with the suppression of JA signaling. Analysis of the Arabidopsis mutant npr1, which is impaired in SA signal transduction, revealed that the antagonistic effect of SA on JA signaling requires the regulatory protein NPR1. Nuclear localization of NPR1, which is essential for SA-mediated defense gene expression, is not required for the suppression of JA signaling, indicating that cross-talk between SA and JA is modulated through a novel function of NPR1 in the cytosol.     

PKS5, a SNFl-related kinase, interacts with and phosphorylates NPR1, and modulates expression of WRKY38 and WRKY62

NPR1 (Nonexpressor of Pathogenesis-Related gene 1) is a major co-activator of plant defense. Phosphorylations of NPR1 play important roles in fine-tuning its activity, however a kinase corresponding to such modification remains uncharacterized. Here, we report that NPR1 interacts with PKS5 (SOS2-like Protein Kinase 5). The AKR (AnKyrin Repeats) motif of NPR1 is required for this interaction. PKS5 phosphorylates NPR1 at the C-terminal region. Expression of PKS5 is induced quickly by Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Expression level of two NPR1 target genes, WRKY38 and WRKY62, is reduced and/or delayed in pks5 mutants. Moreover, the expression of WRKY38 and WRKY62 displays a similar pattern in npr1-1pks5-1 double mutant comparing to that in npr1-1. Our results suggest that PKS5 functions at the upstream of NPR1 and might mediate expression of WRKY38 and WRKY62 possibly by interacting with and phosphorylating NPR1.