Histone H2A and H4 N-terminal Tails Are Positioned by the MEP50 WD Repeat Protein for Efficient Methylation by the PRMT5 Arginine Methyltransferase

The protein arginine methyltransferase PRMT5 is complexed with the WD repeat protein MEP50 (also known as Wdr77 or androgen coactivator p44) in vertebrates in a tetramer of heterodimers. MEP50 is hypothesized to be required for protein substrate recruitment to the catalytic domain of PRMT5. Here we demonstrate that the cross-dimer MEP50 is paired with its cognate PRMT5 molecule to promote histone methylation. We employed qualitative methylation assays and a novel ultrasensitive continuous assay to measure enzyme kinetics. We demonstrate that neither full-length human PRMT5 nor the Xenopus laevis PRMT5 catalytic domain has appreciable protein methyltransferase activity. We show that histones H4 and H3 bind PRMT5-MEP50 more efficiently compared with histone H2A(1–20) and H4(1–20) peptides. Histone binding is mediated through histone fold interactions as determined by competition experiments and by high density histone peptide array interaction studies. Nucleosomes are not a substrate for PRMT5-MEP50, consistent with the primary mode of interaction via the histone fold of H3-H4, obscured by DNA in the nucleosome. Mutation of a conserved arginine (Arg-42) on the MEP50 insertion loop impaired the PRMT5-MEP50 enzymatic efficiency by increasing its histone substrate K_m, comparable with that of Caenorhabditis elegans PRMT5. We show that PRMT5-MEP50 prefers unmethylated substrates, consistent with a distributive model for dimethylation and suggesting discrete biological roles for mono- and dimethylarginine-modified proteins. We propose a model in which MEP50 and PRMT5 simultaneously engage the protein substrate, orienting its targeted arginine to the catalytic site.     

Effects of acetylation of histone H4 at lysines 8 and 16 on activity of the Hat1 histone acetyltransferase

During nucleosome assembly in vivo, newly synthesized histone H4 is specifically diacetylated on lysines 5 and 12 within the H4 NH(2)-terminal tail domain. The highly conserved "K5/K12" deposition pattern of acetylation is thought to be generated by the Hat1 histone acetyltransferase, which in vivo is found in the HAT-B complex. In the following report, the activity and substrate specificity of the human HAT-B complex and of recombinant yeast Hat1p have been examined, using synthetic H4 NH(2)-terminal peptides as substrates. As expected, the unacetylated H4 peptide was a good substrate for acetylation by yeast Hat1p and human HAT-B, while the K5/K12-diacetylated peptide was not significantly acetylated. Notably, an H4 peptide previously diacetylated on lysines 8 and 16 was a very poor substrate for acetylation by either yeast Hat1p or human HAT-B. Treating the K8/K16-diacetylated peptide with histone deacetylase prior to the HAT-B reaction raised acetylation at K5/K12 to 70-80% of control levels. These results present strong support for the model of H4-Hat1p interaction proposed by Dutnall et al. (Dutnall, R. N., Tafrov, S. T., Sternglanz, R., and Ramakrishnan, V. (1998) Cell 94, 427-438) and provide evidence for the first time that site-specific acetylation of histones can regulate the acetylation of other substrate sites.     

Posttranslational Modifications of the Histone 3 Tail and Their Impact on the Activity of Histone Lysine Demethylases In Vitro

Posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of the histone H3 tail such as methylation, acetylation and phosphorylation play important roles in epigenetic signaling. Here we study the effect of some of these PTMs on the demethylation rates of methylated lysine 9 in vitro using peptide substrates mimicking histone H3. Various combinations with other PTMs were employed to study possible cross-talk effects by comparing enzyme kinetic characteristics. We compared the kinetics of histone tail substrates for truncated histone lysine demethylases KDM4A and KDM4C containing only the catalytic core (cc) and some combinations were characterized on full length (FL) KDM4A and KDM4C. We found that the substrates combining trimethylated K4 and K9 resulted in a significant increase in the catalytic activity for FL-KDM4A. For the truncated versions of KDM4A and KDM4C a two-fold increase in the catalytic activity toward bis-trimethylated substrates could be observed. Furthermore, a significant difference in the catalytic activity between dimethylated and trimethylated substrates was found for full length demethylases in line with what has been reported previously for truncated demethylases. Histone peptide substrates phosphorylated at T11 could not be demethylated by neither truncated nor full length KDM4A and KDM4C, suggesting that phosphorylation of threonine 11 prevents demethylation of the H3K9me3 mark on the same peptide. Acetylation of K14 was also found to influence demethylation rates significantly. Thus, for truncated KDM4A, acetylation on K14 of the substrate leads to an increase in enzymatic catalytic efficiency (k _cat/K _m), while for truncated KDM4C it induces a decrease, primarily caused by changes in K _m. This study demonstrates that demethylation activities towards trimethylated H3K9 are significantly influenced by other PTMs on the same peptide, and emphasizes the importance of studying these interactions at the peptide level to get a more detailed understanding of the dynamics of epigenetic marks.     

Cancer-associated 2-oxoglutarate analogues modify histone methylation by inhibiting histone lysine demethylases

Histone lysine demethylases (KDMs) are 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases (2-OGDDs) that regulate gene expression by altering chromatin structure. Their dysregulation has been associated with many cancers. We set out to study the catalytic and inhibitory properties of human KDM4A, KDM4B, KDM5B, KDM6A and KDM6B, aiming in particular to reveal which of these enzymes are targeted by cancer-associated 2-oxoglutarate (2-OG) analogues. We used affinity-purified insect cell-produced enzymes and synthetic peptides with trimethylated lysines as substrates for the in vitro enzyme activity assays. In addition, we treated breast cancer cell lines with cell-permeable forms of 2-OG analogues and studied their effects on the global histone methylation state. Our data show that KDMs have substrate specificity. Among the enzymes studied, KDM5B had the highest affinity for the peptide substrate but the lowest affinity for the 2-OG and the Fe^2 + cosubstrate/cofactors. R-2-hydroxyglutarate (R-2HG) was the most efficient inhibitor of KDM6A, KDM4A and KDM4B, followed by S-2HG. This finding was supported by accumulations of the histone H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 marks in cells treated with the cell-permeable forms of these compounds. KDM5B was especially resistant to inhibition by R-2HG, while citrate was the most efficient inhibitor of KDM6B. We conclude that KDM catalytic activity is susceptible to inhibition by tumorigenic 2-OG analogues and suggest that the inhibition of KDMs is involved in the disease mechanism of cancers in which these compounds accumulate, such as the isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations.     

Developmentally regulated histone modifications in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis> follicle cells: initiation of gene amplification is associated with histone H3 and H4 hyperacetylation and H1 phosphorylation

We have used gene amplification in Drosophila follicle cells as a model of metazoan DNA replication to address whether changes in histone modifications are associated with replication origin activation. We observe that replication initiation is associated with distinct histone modifications. Acetylated lysines K5, K8, and K12 on histone H4 and K14 on histone H3 are specifically enriched during replication initiation at the amplification origins. Strikingly, H4 acetylation persists at an amplification origin well after replication forks have progressed significantly outward from the origin, indicating that H4 acetylation is associated with origin regulation and not histone deposition at the replication forks. Origin recognition complex subunit 2 (orc2) mutants with severe amplification defects do not abolish H4 acetylation, whereas the dup/cdt1 mutant delays the appearance of acetylation foci, and mutants in rbf result in temporal persistence. These data indicate that core histone acetylation is associated with origin activity. Furthermore, follicle cells undergoing gene amplification exhibit high levels of histone H1 phosphorylation. The patterns of H1 phosphorylation provide insights into cell cycle states during amplification, as H1 kinase activity in follicle cells is responsive to high Cyclin E activity, and it can be abolished by overexpressing the retinoblastoma homolog, Rbf, that represses Cyclin E. These data suggest that amplification origins are able to initiate when the cells are in a late S-phase, when the genome is normally not licensed for replication.     

Molecular basis for Gcn5/PCAF histone acetyltransferase selectivity for histone and nonhistone substrates

Histone acetyltransferase (HAT) proteins often exhibit a high degree of specificity for lysine-bearing protein substrates. We have previously reported on the structure of the Tetrahymena Gcn5 HAT protein (tGcn5) bound to its preferred histone H3 substrate, revealing the mode of substrate binding by the Gcn5/PCAF family of HAT proteins. Interestingly, the Gcn5/PCAF HAT family has a remarkable ability to acetylate lysine residues within diverse cognate sites such as those found around lysines 14, 8, and 320 of histones H3, H4, and p53, respectively. To investigate the molecular basis for this, we now report on the crystal structures of tGcn5 bound to 19-residue histone H4 and p53 peptides. A comparison of these structures with tGcn5 bound to histone H3 reveals that the Gcn5/PCAF HATs can accommodate divergent substrates by utilizing analogous interactions with the lysine target and two C-terminal residues with a related chemical nature, suggesting that these interactions play a general role in Gcn5/PCAF substrate binding selectivity. In contrast, while the histone H3 complex shows extensive interactions with tGcn5 and peptide residues N-terminal to the target lysine, the corresponding residues in histone H4 and p53 are disordered, suggesting that the N-terminal substrate region plays an important role in the enhanced affinity of the Gcn5/PCAF HAT proteins for histone H3. Together, these studies provide a framework for understanding the substrate selectivity of HAT proteins.     

Histone modification and chromatin remodeling during NER

Here we review our developments of and results with high resolution studies on global genome nucleotide excision repair (GG-NER) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Technologies were developed to examine NER at nucleotide resolution in yeast sequences of choice and to determine how these related to local changes in chromatin. We focused on how GG-NER relates to histone acetylation for its functioning and we identified the histone acetyltransferase Gcn5 and acetylation at lysines 9/14 of histone H3 as a major factor in enabling efficient repair. Factors influencing this Gcn5-mediated event are considered which include Rad16, a GG-NER specific SWI/SNF factor and the yeast histone variant of H2AZ (Htz1). We describe results employing primarily MFA2 as a model gene, but also those with URA3 located at subtelomeric sequences. In the latter case we also see a role for acetylation at histone H4. We then consider the development of a high resolution genome-wide approach that enables one to examine correlations between histone modifications and the NER of UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers throughout entire yeast genome. This is an approach that will enable rapid advances in understanding the complexities of how compacted chromatin in chromosomes is processed to access DNA damage before it is returned to its pre-damaged status to maintain epigenetic codes.     

Subunit Composition and Substrate Specificity of a MOF-containing Histone Acetyltransferase Distinct from the Male-specific Lethal (MSL) Complex

Human MOF (MYST1), a member of the MYST (Moz-Ybf2/Sas3-Sas2-Tip60) family of histone acetyltransferases (HATs), is the human ortholog of the Drosophila males absent on the first (MOF) protein. MOF is the catalytic subunit of the male-specific lethal (MSL) HAT complex, which plays a key role in dosage compensation in the fly and is responsible for a large fraction of histone H4 lysine 16 (H4K16) acetylation in vivo. MOF was recently reported to be a component of a second HAT complex, designated the non-specific lethal (NSL) complex (Mendjan, S., Taipale, M., Kind, J., Holz, H., Gebhardt, P., Schelder, M., Vermeulen, M., Buscaino, A., Duncan, K., Mueller, J., Wilm, M., Stunnenberg, H. G., Saumweber, H., and Akhtar, A. (2006) Mol. Cell 21, 811–823). Here we report an analysis of the subunit composition and substrate specificity of the NSL complex. Proteomic analyses of complexes purified through multiple candidate subunits reveal that NSL is composed of nine subunits. Two of its subunits, WD repeat domain 5 (WDR5) and host cell factor 1 (HCF1), are shared with members of the MLL/SET family of histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) methyltransferase complexes, and a third subunit, MCRS1, is shared with the human INO80 chromatin-remodeling complex. In addition, we show that assembly of the MOF HAT into MSL or NSL complexes controls its substrate specificity. Although MSL-associated MOF acetylates nucleosomal histone H4 almost exclusively on lysine 16, NSL-associated MOF exhibits a relaxed specificity and also acetylates nucleosomal histone H4 on lysines 5 and 8.     

Human Naa50p (Nat5/San) Displays Both Protein Nα- and N?-Acetyltransferase Activity

Protein acetylation is a widespread modification that is mediated by site-selective acetyltransferases. KATs (lysine N^ϵ-acetyltransferases), modify the side chain of specific lysines on histones and other proteins, a central process in regulating gene expression. N^α-terminal acetylation occurs on the ribosome where the α amino group of nascent polypeptides is acetylated by NATs (N-terminal acetyltransferase). In yeast, three different NAT complexes were identified NatA, NatB, and NatC. NatA is composed of two main subunits, the catalytic subunit Naa10p (Ard1p) and Naa15p (Nat1p). Naa50p (Nat5) is physically associated with NatA. In man, hNaa50p was shown to have acetyltransferase activity and to be important for chromosome segregation. In this study, we used purified recombinant hNaa50p and multiple oligopeptide substrates to identify and characterize an N^α-acetyltransferase activity of hNaa50p. As the preferred substrate this activity acetylates oligopeptides with N termini Met-Leu-Xxx-Pro. Furthermore, hNaa50p autoacetylates lysines 34, 37, and 140 in vitro, modulating hNaa50p substrate specificity. In addition, histone 4 was detected as a hNaa50p KAT substrate in vitro. Our findings thus provide the first experimental evidence of an enzyme having both KAT and NAT activities.     

Studies on the catalytic domains of multiple JmjC oxygenases using peptide substrates

The JmjC-domain-containing 2-oxoglutarate-dependent oxygenases catalyze protein hydroxylation and N^ε-methyllysine demethylation via hydroxylation. A subgroup of this family, the JmjC lysine demethylases (JmjC KDMs) are involved in histone modifications at multiple sites. There are conflicting reports as to the substrate selectivity of some JmjC oxygenases with respect to KDM activities. In this study, a panel of modified histone H3 peptides was tested for demethylation against 15 human JmjC-domain-containing proteins. The results largely confirmed known N^ε-methyllysine substrates. However, the purified KDM4 catalytic domains showed greater substrate promiscuity than previously reported (i.e., KDM4A was observed to catalyze demethylation at H3K27 as well as H3K9/K36). Crystallographic analyses revealed that the N^ε-methyllysine of an H3K27me3 peptide binds similarly to N^ε-methyllysines of H3K9me3/H3K36me3 with KDM4A. A subgroup of JmjC proteins known to catalyze hydroxylation did not display demethylation activity. Overall, the results reveal that the catalytic domains of the KDM4 enzymes may be less selective than previously identified. They also draw a distinction between the N^ε-methyllysine demethylation and hydroxylation activities within the JmjC subfamily. These results will be of use to those working on functional studies of the JmjC enzymes.     

Histone acetylation and deacetylation: identification of acetylation and methylation sites of HeLa histone H4 by mass spectrometry

The acetylation isoforms of histone H4 from butyrate-treated HeLa cells were separated by C(4) reverse-phase high pressure liquid chromatography and by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Histone H4 bands were excised and digested in-gel with the endoprotease trypsin. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry was used to characterize the level of acetylation, and nanoelectrospray tandem mass spectrometric analysis of the acetylated peptides was used to determine the exact sites of acetylation. Although there are 15 acetylation sites possible, only four acetylated peptide sequences were actually observed. The tetra-acetylated form is modified at lysines 5, 8, 12, and 16, the tri-acetylated form is modified at lysines 8, 12, and 16, and the di-acetylated form is modified at lysines 12 and 16. The only significant amount of the mono-acetylated form was found at position 16. These results are consistent with the hypothesis of a "zip" model whereby acetylation of histone H4 proceeds in the direction of from Lys-16 to Lys-5, and deacetylation proceeds in the reverse direction. Histone acetylation and deacetylation are coordinated processes leading to a non-random distribution of isoforms. Our results also revealed that lysine 20 is di-methylated in all modified isoforms, as well as the non-acetylated isoform of H4.     

Control of histone acetylation : Cell-cycle dependence of deacetylase activity in Physarum nuclei

Nuclei from naturally synchronous plasmodia of Physarum polycephalum were assayed for histone deacetylase activity. The substrate for the assay was a peptide comprising the amino terminal region (residues 1–23) of calf thymus histone H4. The deacetylase activity per nucleus remained constant during S phase and early G2 phase and then doubled in a linear fashion during mid and late G2 phase reaching its maximum level at metaphase. The data imply that H4 acetylation is linked to prior chromatin structural changes.     

EpiProfile Quantifies Histone Peptides With Modifications by Extracting Retention Time and Intensity in High-resolution Mass Spectra

Histone post-translational modifications contribute to chromatin function through their chemical properties which influence chromatin structure and their ability to recruit chromatin interacting proteins. Nanoflow liquid chromatography coupled with high resolution tandem mass spectrometry (nanoLC-MS/MS) has emerged as the most suitable technology for global histone modification analysis because of the high sensitivity and the high mass accuracy of this approach that provides confident identification. However, analysis of histones with this method is even more challenging because of the large number and variety of isobaric histone peptides and the high dynamic range of histone peptide abundances. Here, we introduce EpiProfile, a software tool that discriminates isobaric histone peptides using the distinguishing fragment ions in their tandem mass spectra and extracts the chromatographic area under the curve using previous knowledge about peptide retention time. The accuracy of EpiProfile was evaluated by analysis of mixtures containing different ratios of synthetic histone peptides. In addition to label-free quantification of histone peptides, EpiProfile is flexible and can quantify different types of isotopically labeled histone peptides. EpiProfile is unique in generating layouts (i.e. relative retention time) of histone peptides when compared with manual quantification of the data and other programs (such as Skyline), filling the need of an automatic and freely available tool to quantify labeled and non-labeled modified histone peptides. In summary, EpiProfile is a valuable nanoflow liquid chromatography coupled with high resolution tandem mass spectrometry-based quantification tool for histone peptides, which can also be adapted to analyze nonhistone protein samples.The nucleosome, the basic unit of chromatin, consists of 147 base pairs of DNA wrapped around histone proteins (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4). Histones play vital roles in chromatin, interacting with many signaling proteins and chromatin-structural proteins through various post-translational modifications (PTMs)¹ (1–3). There are numerous PTMs on histones, including methylation (mono - me1, di - me2, tri - me3), acetylation (ac), phosphorylation (ph), ubiquitination, and SUMOylation (4). Histone PTMs can affect chromatin function, and therefore influence processes such as gene accessibility, DNA repair and chromosome condensation. Moreover, histone PTMs cross-talk in a synergistic manner to fine-tune gene expression (5). Therefore, quantification of histone PTMs has become a high priority to investigate cell regulation and epigenetics (6).Traditionally, antibody-based methods (e.g. Western blot) have been used to analyze histone modifications (7), which have multiple disadvantages. First, antibodies are not available for every new PTM discovered. Second, PTMs on neighboring amino acids (e.g. H3K9me1–3 and H3S10ph) may prevent antibody binding, a phenomenon called epitope occlusion. Third, the quantification of PTMs via antibody-based methods is not sensitive to small differences (e.g. <twofold). Mass spectrometry (MS) has emerged as a sensitive and efficient technique to detect known and novel PTMs (8). The high mass accuracy and the high speed of modern mass spectrometers allow for sensitive, confident, and accurate peptide quantification when coupled with nanoflow liquid chromatography (nanoLC).NanoLC-MS/MS analysis of protein digests (i.e. bottom-up MS) is nowadays a mature and widely applied technology. Data-dependent acquisition is the most commonly adopted MS acquisition method to identify peptides via bottom-up MS (9–12), generating MS1 and MS2 spectra. Nevertheless, histone proteins are particularly challenging to analyze by using the generalized bottom-up workflow. As histones are rich with lysines and arginines, tryptic digest of histones generates short peptides that are difficult to be retained on C18 columns. To improve histone peptide retention, the unmodified and mono-methylated lysines and peptide N terminus can be selectively chemically propionylated (13–16), preventing tryptic digest after lysine to generate longer peptides. Moreover, peptide identification through traditional database searches leads to a large number of false positives, as allowing several dynamic modifications (e.g. me1/me2/me3, ac, ph) dramatically increases the number of molecular candidates and thus the possibility to achieve a false hit (12). Therefore, software tools that quantify histone peptides require additional data to correctly map a given peptide, such as previous knowledge of peptide retention time.Quantification of histone peptides is particularly challenging because of presence of isobaric peptides, near isobaric PTMs such as tri-methylation (42.047 Da) and acetylation (42.011 Da), and low abundant species. Previous knowledge about relative peptide retention time (RT) enables differentiation between species close in mass and therefore selection of the correct peak for integration of the area of the chromatographic peak (i.e. area under curve or AUC). However, determination of peptide RT might be difficult because of their low abundance though acid extraction was performed to purify histones. This problem can be solved by using isotopically labeled synthetic histone peptides (17), or data independent approaches (18). When using relative retention time information to assign peak identities, reproducible nanoLC is crucial, especially because some isobaric peptides co-elute. In this case, the MS acquisition method must perform targeted MS2 for the co-eluting isobaric peptides at the specific time that they elute. These species can be discriminated and quantified based on the intensity of fragment ions unique to each species. For instance, the peptides KacSTGGKAPR (H3K9ac) and KSTGGKacAPR (H3K14ac) have the same mass and overlap at the nanoLC elution (the full protein sequence of human canonical histone H3 and H4 are shown in Fig. 1A). Thus, the co-eluting isobaric peptides could not be quantified separately based on the MS1 signal, but the unique fragment ions present in MS2 spectra allow them to be quantified individually.Open in a separate windowFig. 1.Histones are a challenge for quantitative mass spectrometry analyses. A, Human histone H3.1 and H4 protein sequences. B, Spline fitting to calculate AUC: blue lines are the original peaks and pink lines are the fitted peaks. C, An example of isobaric PTM modified peptides. The above MS2 is matched with H3K18ac, and the same MS2 is also matched with H3K23ac below. D, The workflow of EpiProfile: inputting precursor m/z and charge state, extracting elution profiles, selecting the correct chromatographic peak, calculating AUC, and outputting quantification tables and figures.There have been few computational investigations attempting to solve the problem of quantifying co-eluting isobaric peptides. DiMaggio et al. used a mixed integer linear optimization (MILP) framework to quantify partially co-eluting isobaric histone peptides from electron transfer dissociation (ETD) spectra (19). The framework is comprised of two MILP models: (1) enumerating the entire space of the modified forms that satisfy a given peptide mass and (2) determining the relative composition of the modified forms in the spectrum. Another study by Guan et al. identified isobaric peptides by searching ETD MS/MS spectra for ions representing all possible configurations of modified peptides using a visual assistance program. The relative abundances of these species were estimated by using a nonnegative least squares procedure (20). Other quantification programs can also perform accurate peak picking, but are commonly not as suitable for heavily modified and isobaric histone peptides (e.g. Skyline) (21). These software programs are unable to provide the layouts of histone peptides (i.e. relative RTs) or discriminate all isobaric modified peptides, two tasks that are vital for full characterization of a histone sample.In this study, we developed a new quantification program named EpiProfile. EpiProfile extracts ion chromatography for known histone peptides by using previous knowledge about their elution profiles. Moreover, it discriminates and quantifies the isobaric histone peptides by resolving the linear equations listed with the peak heights of unique fragment ions between the two modification sites in the MS2 spectra (e.g. ions between H3K9ac and H3K14ac). We evaluated the accuracy of EpiProfile by mixing different ratios of synthetic histone peptides, and then tested EpiProfile by analyzing nanoLC-MS/MS data sets of the following samples: purified histones from HeLa cells, a synthetic histone peptide library, and histone peptides labeled during cell growth with ¹³C-labeled glucose media or stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) (22). We compared EpiProfile to manual quantification of the data, and also with the openly available program Skyline. We found that manual quantification is obviously time-consuming and that Skyline cannot generate the layouts of histone peptides and cannot discriminate four or six-component isobaric peptides, a common occurrence in histone data. Moreover, EpiProfile is highly flexible, and thus it can be used to analyze various protein samples, including isotopically labeled peptides and nonhistone data sets.     

Processing mechanism and substrate selectivity of the core NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex

Esa1, an essential MYST histone acetyltransferase found in the yeast piccolo NuA4 complex (picNuA4), is responsible for genome-wide histone H4 and histone H2A acetylation. picNuA4 uniquely catalyzes the rapid tetra-acetylation of nucleosomal H4, though the molecular determinants driving picNuA4 efficiency and specificity have not been defined. Here, we show through rapid substrate trapping experiments that picNuA4 utilizes a nonprocessive mechanism in which picNuA4 dissociates from the substrate after each acetylation event. Quantitative mass spectral analyses indicate that picNuA4 randomly acetylates free and nucleosomal H4, with a small preference for lysines 5, 8, and 12 over lysine 16. Using a series of 24 histone mutants of H4 and H2A, we investigated the parameters affecting catalytic efficiency. Most strikingly, removal of lysine residues did not substantially affect the ability of picNuA4 to acetylate remaining sites, and insertion of an additional lysine into the H4 tail led to rapid quintuple acetylation. Conversion of the native H2A tail to an H4-like sequence resulted in enhanced multisite acetylation. Collectively, the results suggest picNuA4's site selectivity is dictated by accessibility on the nucleosome surface, the relative proximity from the histone fold domain, and a preference for intervening glycine residues with a minimal (n + 2) spacing between lysines. Functionally distinct from other HAT families, the proposed model for picNuA4 represents a unique mechanism of substrate recognition and multisite acetylation.