Characterization of the Arabidopsis heterotrimeric G protein

We have used fluorescence resonance energy transfer and co-immunoprecipitation to analyze the interactions among the alpha, beta, and gamma1 subunits of the Arabidopsis heterotrimeric G protein. Using cyan and yellow fluorescent protein fusion constructs, we show that overexpressed Ggamma1 localizes to protoplast membranes, but Gbeta exhibits membrane localization only when the Ggamma1 protein is co-overexpressed. Overexpressed Galpha shows membrane localization unaccompanied by overexpression of either Gbeta or Ggamma1. We detect fluorescence resonance energy transfer between Gbeta and Ggamma1 in the absence of Galpha overexpression and between Galpha and Ggamma1 but only when all three subunits are co-overexpressed. Both Galpha and Gbeta are associated with large macromolecular complexes of approximately 700 kDa in the plasma membrane. Galpha is present in both large complexes and as free Galpha in plasma membranes from wild type plants. In plants homozygous for a null allele of the Gbeta gene, Galpha is associated with smaller complexes in the 200-400-kDa range, indicating that its presence in the large complex depends on association with Gbetagamma. Activation of the Galpha subunit with guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) results in partial dissociation of Galpha from the complex. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) promotes extensive dissociation of the Galpha complex but does not interfere with binding of GTPgammaS to purified recombinant Galpha, suggesting that reactive oxygen species affect the stability of the large complex but not the activity of Galpha itself.     

Dopamine receptor-interacting protein 78 acts as a molecular chaperone for Ggamma subunits before assembly with Gbeta

Heterotrimeric G proteins play a central role in intracellular communication mediated by extracellular signals, and both Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits regulate effectors downstream of activated receptors. The particular constituents of the G protein heterotrimer affect both specificity and efficiency of signal transduction. However, little is known about mechanistic aspects of G protein assembly in the cell that would certainly contribute to formation of heterotrimers of specific composition. It was recently shown that phosducin-like protein (PhLP) modulated both Gbetagamma expression and subsequent signaling by chaperoning nascent Gbeta and facilitating heterodimer formation with Ggamma subunits (Lukov, G. L., Hu, T., McLaughlin, J. N., Hamm, H. E., and Willardson, B. M. (2005) EMBO J. 24, 1965-1975; Humrich, J., Bermel, C., Bunemann, M., Harmark, L., Frost, R., Quitterer, U., and Lohse, M. J. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 20042-20050). Here we demonstrate using a variety of techniques that DRiP78, an endoplasmic reticulum resident protein known to regulate the trafficking of several seven transmembrane receptors, interacts specifically with the Ggamma subunit but not Gbeta or Galpha subunits. Furthermore, we demonstrate that DRiP78 and the Gbeta subunit can compete for the Ggamma subunit. DRiP78 also protects Ggamma from degradation until a stable partner such as Gbeta is provided. Furthermore, DRiP78 interaction may represent a mechanism for assembly of specific Gbetagamma heterodimers, as selectivity was observed among Ggamma isoforms for interaction with DRiP78 depending on the presence of particular Gbeta subunits. Interestingly, we could detect an interaction between DRiP78 and PhLP, suggesting a role of DRiP78 in the assembly of Gbetagamma by linking Ggamma to PhLP.Gbeta complexes. Our results, therefore, suggest a role of DRiP78 as a chaperone in the assembly of Gbetagamma subunits of the G protein.     

Regulator of G-protein signaling 3 (RGS3) inhibits Gbeta1gamma 2-induced inositol phosphate production, mitogen-activated protein kinase activation, and Akt activation

Regulator of G-protein signaling 3 (RGS3) enhances the intrinsic rate at which Galpha(i) and Galpha(q) hydrolyze GTP to GDP, thereby limiting the duration in which GTP-Galpha(i) and GTP-Galpha(q) can activate effectors. Since GDP-Galpha subunits rapidly combine with free Gbetagamma subunits to reform inactive heterotrimeric G-proteins, RGS3 and other RGS proteins may also reduce the amount of Gbetagamma subunits available for effector interactions. Although RGS6, RGS7, and RGS11 bind Gbeta(5) in the absence of a Ggamma subunit, RGS proteins are not known to directly influence Gbetagamma signaling. Here we show that RGS3 binds Gbeta(1)gamma(2) subunits and limits their ability to trigger the production of inositol phosphates and the activation of Akt and mitogen-activated protein kinase. Co-expression of RGS3 with Gbeta(1)gamma(2) inhibits Gbeta(1)gamma(2)-induced inositol phosphate production and Akt activation in COS-7 cells and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in HEK 293 cells. The inhibition of Gbeta(1)gamma(2) signaling does not require an intact RGS domain but depends upon two regions in RGS3 located between acids 313 and 390 and between 391 and 458. Several other RGS proteins do not affect Gbeta(1)gamma(2) signaling in these assays. Consistent with the in vivo results, RGS3 inhibits Gbetagamma-mediated activation of phospholipase Cbeta in vitro. Thus, RGS3 may limit Gbetagamma signaling not only by virtue of its GTPase-activating protein activity for Galpha subunits, but also by directly interfering with the activation of effectors.     

GPCR-induced dissociation of G-protein subunits in early stage signal transduction

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) form a ternary complex of agonist, receptor and G-proteins during primary signal transduction at the cell membrane. Downstream signalling is thought to be preceded by the process of dissociation of Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits, thus exposing new surfaces to interact with downstream effectors. We demonstrate here for the first time, the dissociation of heterotrimeric G-protein subunits (i.e., Galpha and Gbetagamma) following agonist-induced GPCR (alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor; alpha(2A)-AR) activation in a cell-free assay system. alpha(2A)-AR membranes were reconstituted with the G-proteins (+/-hexahistidine-tagged) Galpha(i1) and Gbeta1gamma2 and functional signalling was determined following activation of the reconstituted receptor:G-protein complex with the potent agonist UK-14304, and [35S]GTPgammaS. In the presence of Ni(2+)-coated agarose beads, the activated his-tagged Galpha(i1)his-[35S]GTPgammaS complex was captured on the Ni(2+)-presenting surface. When his-tagged Gbeta1gamma2 (Gbeta1gamma2his) was used with Galpha(i1), the [35S]GTPgammaS-bound Galpha(i1) was not present on the Ni(2+)-coated beads, but rather, it was separated from the beta1gamma2(his)-beads, demonstrating receptor-induced dissociation of Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits. Treatment of the reconstituted alpha(2A)-AR membranes containing Gbeta1gamma2his:Galpha(i1) with imidazole confirmed the specificity for the Ni2+:G-protein surface dissociation of Galpha(i1) from Gbeta1gamma2his. These data demonstrate for the first time, the complete dissociation of the G-protein subunits and extend observations on the role of G-proteins in the assembly and disassembly of the ternary complex in the primary events of GPCR signalling.     

G Protein betagamma dimer formation: Gbeta and Ggamma differentially determine efficiency of in vitro dimer formation

The Gbeta and Ggamma subunit of the heterotrimeric G proteins form a functional dimer that is stable once assembled in vivo or in vitro. The requirements, mechanism, and specificity of dimer formation are still incompletely understood, but represent important biochemical processes involved in the specificity of cellular signaling through G proteins. Here, seven Gbeta and 12 FLAG-epitope-tagged Ggamma subunits were separately synthesized in vitro using a rabbit reticulocyte lysate expression system. The translation products were combined and dimers isolated by immunoprecipitation. Gbeta1 and Gbeta4 formed dimers with all Ggamma subunit isoforms, generally with Gbeta/Ggamma stoichiometries between 0.2:1 and 0.5:1. Gbeta5, Gbeta5L, and Gbeta3s did not form significant amounts of dimer with any of the gamma subunit isoforms. Gbeta2 and Gbeta3 formed dimers with selected Ggamma isoforms to levels intermediate between that of Gbeta1/Gbeta4 and Gbeta3s/Gbeta5/Gbeta5L. We also expressed selected Gbetagamma in HEK293 cells and measured PLCbeta2 activity. Gbetagamma dimer-dependent increases in IP3 production were seen with most Gbeta1, Gbeta2, and Gbeta5 combinations, indicating functional dimer expression in intact cells. These results define the complete set of G protein betagamma dimers that are formed using a single biochemical assay method and suggest that there are Gbeta isoform-specific factors in rabbit reticulocyte lysates that determine the efficacy of Gbetagamma dimer formation.     

Galpha(q/11) and gbetagamma proteins and membrane signaling of calcitriol and estradiol.

17beta-estradiol and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3)()(calcitriol) rapidly increase (< 5 sec) the concentration of intracellular calcium by mobilizing Ca(2+) from the endoplasmic reticulum and forming inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP(3)) and diacylglycerol. Calcitriol increases InsP(3) formation via activation of phospholipase C (PLC)-beta1 linked to a pertussis toxin (PTX)-insensitive G-protein, and estradiol via activation of PLC-beta2 linked to a PTX-sensitive G-protein. Since PLC are effectors of different subunits of various G-proteins, we looked for and identified several G-subunits (Galpha(q/11), Galphas, Galphai, Gbeta and Ggamma) in female rat osteoblasts using Western immunoblotting. The action of calcitriol on InsP(3) formation and Ca(2+) mobilization in Fura-2-loaded confluent osteoblasts involved Galpha(q/11). The membrane effects of estradiol involved Gbetagamma; subunits, and principally Gbeta subunits, but not alpha-subunits. These results may provide additional evidence for membrane receptors of steroid hormones. Since PLC-beta1 is the target effector of Galpha(q/11), whereas PLC-beta2 is only activated by betagamma subunits, this specificity may help to generate membrane receptor-specific responses in vivo.     

Role of the chaperonin CCT/TRiC complex in G protein betagamma-dimer assembly

Gbetagamma dimer formation occurs early in the assembly of heterotrimeric G proteins. On nondenaturing (native) gels, in vitro translated, (35)S-labeled Ggamma subunits traveled primarily according to their pI and apparently were not associated with other proteins. In contrast, in vitro translated, (35)S-labeled Gbeta subunits traveled at a high apparent molecular mass (approximately 700 kDa) and co-migrated with the chaperonin CCT complex (also called TRiC). Different FLAG-Gbeta isoforms coprecipitated CCT/TRiC to a variable extent, and this correlated with the ability of the different Gbeta subunits to efficiently form dimers with Ggamma. When translated Ggamma was added to translated Gbeta, a new band of low apparent molecular mass (approximately 50 kDa) was observed, which was labeled by either (35)S-labeled Gbeta or Ggamma, indicating that it is a dimer. Formation of the Gbetagamma dimer was ATP-dependent and inhibited by either adenosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate) or aluminum fluoride in the presence of Mg(2+). This inhibition led to increased association of Gbeta with CCT/TRiC. Although Ggamma did not bind CCT/TRiC, addition of Ggamma to previously synthesized Gbeta caused its release from the CCT/TRiC complex. We conclude that the chaperonin CCT/TRiC complex binds to and folds Gbeta subunits and that CCT/TRiC mediates Gbetagamma dimer formation by an ATP-dependent reaction.     

Ggamma1 + Ggamma2 not equal to Gbeta: heterotrimeric G protein Ggamma-deficient mutants do not recapitulate all phenotypes of Gbeta-deficient mutants

Heterotrimeric G proteins are signaling molecules ubiquitous among all eukaryotes. The Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genome contains one Galpha (GPA1), one Gbeta (AGB1), and two Ggamma subunit (AGG1 and AGG2) genes. The Gbeta requirement of a functional Ggamma subunit for active signaling predicts that a mutant lacking both AGG1 and AGG2 proteins should phenotypically resemble mutants lacking AGB1 in all respects. We previously reported that Gbeta- and Ggamma-deficient mutants coincide during plant pathogen interaction, lateral root development, gravitropic response, and some aspects of seed germination. Here, we report a number of phenotypic discrepancies between Gbeta- and Ggamma-deficient mutants, including the double mutant lacking both Ggamma subunits. While Gbeta-deficient mutants are hypersensitive to abscisic acid inhibition of seed germination and are hyposensitive to abscisic acid inhibition of stomatal opening and guard cell inward K+ currents, none of the available Ggamma-deficient mutants shows any deviation from the wild type in these responses, nor do they show the hypocotyl elongation and hook development defects that are characteristic of Gbeta-deficient mutants. In addition, striking discrepancies were observed in the aerial organs of Gbeta- versus Ggamma-deficient mutants. In fact, none of the distinctive traits observed in Gbeta-deficient mutants (such as reduced size of cotyledons, leaves, flowers, and siliques) is present in any of the Ggamma single and double mutants. Despite the considerable amount of phenotypic overlap between Gbeta- and Ggamma-deficient mutants, confirming the tight relationship between Gbeta and Ggamma subunits in plants, considering the significant differences reported here, we hypothesize the existence of new and as yet unknown elements in the heterotrimeric G protein signaling complex.     

Canonical heterotrimeric G proteins regulating mating and virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans

Perturbation of pheromone signaling modulates not only mating but also virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans, an opportunistic human pathogen known to encode three Galpha, one Gbeta, and two Ggamma subunit proteins. We have found that Galphas Gpa2 and Gpa3 exhibit shared and distinct roles in regulating pheromone responses and mating. Gpa2 interacted with the pheromone receptor homolog Ste3alpha, Gbeta subunit Gpb1, and RGS protein Crg1. Crg1 also exhibited in vitro GAP activity toward Gpa2. These findings suggest that Gpa2 regulates mating through a conserved signaling mechanism. Moreover, we found that Ggammas Gpg1 and Gpg2 both regulate pheromone responses and mating. gpg1 mutants were attenuated in mating, and gpg2 mutants were sterile. Finally, although gpa2, gpa3, gpg1, gpg2, and gpg1 gpg2 mutants were fully virulent, gpa2 gpa3 mutants were attenuated for virulence in a murine model. Our study reveals a conserved but distinct signaling mechanism by two Galpha, one Gbeta, and two Ggamma proteins for pheromone responses, mating, and virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans, and it also reiterates that the link between mating and virulence is not due to mating per se but rather to certain mating-pathway components that encode additional functions promoting virulence.     

The RACK1 ortholog Asc1 functions as a G-protein beta subunit coupled to glucose responsiveness in yeast

According to the prevailing paradigm, G-proteins are composed of three subunits, an alpha subunit with GTPase activity and a tightly associated betagamma subunit complex. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae there are two known Galpha proteins (Gpa1 and Gpa2) but only one Gbetagamma, which binds only to Gpa1. Here we show that the yeast ortholog of RACK1 (receptor for activated protein kinase C1) Asc1 functions as the Gbeta for Gpa2. As with other known Gbeta proteins, Asc1 has a 7-WD domain structure, interacts directly with the Galpha in a guanine nucleotide-dependent manner, and inhibits Galpha guanine nucleotide exchange activity. In addition, Asc1 binds to the effector enzyme adenylyl cyclase (Cyr1), and diminishes the production of cAMP in response to glucose stimulation. Thus, whereas Gpa2 promotes glucose signaling through elevated production of cAMP, Asc1 has opposing effects on these same processes. Our findings reveal the existence of an unusual Gbeta subunit, one having multiple functions within the cell in addition to serving as a signal transducer for cell surface receptors and intracellular effectors.     

Ggamma subunit-selective G protein beta 5 mutant defines regulators of G protein signaling protein binding requirement for nuclear localization

The signal transducing function of Gbeta(5) in brain is unknown. When studied in vitro Gbeta(5) is the only heterotrimeric Gbeta subunit known to interact with both Ggamma subunits and regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins. When tested with Ggamma, Gbeta(5) interacts with other classical components of heterotrimeric G protein signaling pathways such as Galpha and phospholipase C-beta. We recently demonstrated nuclear expression of Gbeta(5) in neurons and brain (Zhang, J. H., Barr, V. A., Mo, Y., Rojkova, A. M., Liu, S., and Simonds, W. F. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 10284-10289). To gain further insight into the mechanism of Gbeta(5) nuclear localization, we generated a Gbeta(5) mutant deficient in its ability to interact with RGS7 while retaining its ability to bind Ggamma, and we compared its properties to the wild-type Gbeta(5). In HEK-293 cells co-transfection of RGS7 but not Ggamma(2) supported expression in the nuclear fraction of transfected wild-type Gbeta(5). In contrast the Ggamma-preferring Gbeta(5) mutant was not expressed in the HEK-293 cell nuclear fraction with either co-transfectant. The Ggamma-selective Gbeta(5) mutant was also excluded from the cell nucleus of transfected PC12 cells analyzed by laser confocal microscopy. These results define a requirement for RGS protein binding for Gbeta(5) nuclear expression.     

Two RGS proteins that inhibit Galpha(o) and Galpha(q) signaling in C. elegans neurons require a Gbeta(5)-like subunit for function

BACKGROUND: Gbeta proteins have traditionally been thought to complex with Ggamma proteins to function as subunits of G protein heterotrimers. The divergent Gbeta(5) protein, however, can bind either Ggamma proteins or regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins that contain a G gamma-like (GGL) domain. RGS proteins inhibit G protein signaling by acting as Galpha GTPase activators. While Gbeta(5) appears to bind RGS proteins in vivo, its association with Ggamma proteins in vivo has not been clearly demonstrated. It is unclear how Gbeta(5) might influence RGS activity. In C. elegans there are exactly two GGL-containing RGS proteins, EGL-10 and EAT-16, and they inhibit Galpha(o) and Galpha(q) signaling, respectively. RESULTS: We knocked out the gene encoding the C. elegans Gbeta(5) ortholog, GPB-2, to determine its physiological roles in G protein signaling. The gpb-2 mutation reduces the functions of EGL-10 and EAT-16 to levels comparable to those found in egl-10 and eat-16 null mutants. gpb-2 knockout animals are viable, and exhibit no obvious defects beyond those that can be attributed to a reduction of EGL-10 or EAT-16 function. GPB-2 protein is nearly absent in eat-16; egl-10 double mutants, and EGL-10 protein is severely diminished in gpb-2 mutants. CONCLUSIONS: Gbeta(5) functions in vivo complexed with GGL-containing RGS proteins. In the absence of Gbeta(5), these RGS proteins have little or no function. The formation of RGS-Gbeta(5) complexes is required for the expression or stability of both the RGS and Gbeta(5) proteins. Appropriate RGS-Gbeta(5) complexes regulate both Galpha(o) and Galpha(q) proteins in vivo.     

Critical determinants of the G protein gamma subunits in the Gbetagamma stimulation of G protein-activated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channel activity

The betagamma subunits of G proteins modulate inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels through direct interactions. Although GIRK currents are stimulated by mammalian Gbetagamma subunits, we show that they were inhibited by the yeast Gbetagamma (Ste4/Ste18) subunits. A chimera between the yeast and the mammalian Gbeta1 subunits (ymbeta) stimulated or inhibited GIRK currents, depending on whether it was co-expressed with mammalian or yeast Ggamma subunits, respectively. This result underscores the critical functional influence of the Ggamma subunits on the effectiveness of the Gbetagamma complex. A series of chimeras between Ggamma2 and the yeast Ggamma revealed that the C-terminal half of the Ggamma2 subunit is required for channel activation by the Gbetagamma complex. Point mutations of Ggamma2 to the corresponding yeast Ggamma residues identified several amino acids that reduced significantly the ability of Gbetagamma to stimulate channel activity, an effect that was not due to improper association with Gbeta. Most of the identified critical Ggamma residues clustered together, forming an intricate network of interactions with the Gbeta subunit, defining an interaction surface of the Gbetagamma complex with GIRK channels. These results show for the first time a functional role for Ggamma in the effector role of Gbetagamma.     

Activation of phospholipase C-epsilon by heterotrimeric G protein betagamma-subunits

PLC-epsilon was identified recently as a phosphoinositide-hydrolyzing phospholipase C (PLC) containing catalytic domains (X, Y, and C2) common to all PLC isozymes as well as unique CDC25- and Ras-associating domains. Novel regulation of this PLC isozyme by the Ras oncoprotein and alpha-subunits (Galpha(12)) of heterotrimeric G proteins was illustrated. Sequence analyses of PLC-epsilon revealed previously unrecognized PH and EF-hand domains in the amino terminus. The known interaction of Gbetagamma subunits with the PH domains of other proteins led us to examine the capacity of Gbetagamma to activate PLC-epsilon. Co-expression of Gbeta(1)gamma(2) with PLC-epsilon in COS-7 cells resulted in marked stimulation of phospholipase C activity. Gbeta(2) and Gbeta(4) in combination with Ggamma(1), Ggamma(2), Ggamma(3), or Ggamma(13) also activated PLC-epsilon to levels similar to those observed with Gbeta(1)-containing dimers of these Ggamma-subunits. Gbeta(3) in combination with the same Ggamma-subunits was less active, and Gbeta(5)-containing dimers were essentially inactive. Gbetagamma-promoted activation of PLC-epsilon was blocked by cotransfection with either of two Gbetagamma-interacting proteins, Galpha(i1) or the carboxyl terminus of G protein receptor kinase 2. Pharmacological inhibition of PI3-kinase-gamma had no effect on Gbeta(1)gamma(2)-promoted activation of PLC-epsilon. Similarly, activation of Ras in the action of Gbetagamma is unlikely, because a mutation in the second RA domain of PLC-epsilon that blocks Ras activation of PLC failed to alter the stimulatory activity of Gbeta(1)gamma(2). Taken together, these results reveal the presence of additional functional domains in PLC-epsilon and add a new level of complexity in the regulation of this novel enzyme by heterotrimeric G proteins.     

Galpha subunit Gpa2 recruits kelch repeat subunits that inhibit receptor-G protein coupling during cAMP-induced dimorphic transitions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

All eukaryotic cells sense extracellular stimuli and activate intracellular signaling cascades via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) and associated heterotrimeric G proteins. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae GPCR Gpr1 and associated Galpha subunit Gpa2 sense extracellular carbon sources (including glucose) to govern filamentous growth. In contrast to conventional Galpha subunits, Gpa2 forms an atypical G protein complex with the kelch repeat Gbeta mimic proteins Gpb1 and Gpb2. Gpb1/2 negatively regulate cAMP signaling by inhibiting Gpa2 and an as yet unidentified target. Here we show that Gpa2 requires lipid modifications of its N-terminus for membrane localization but association with the Gpr1 receptor or Gpb1/2 subunits is dispensable for membrane targeting. Instead, Gpa2 promotes membrane localization of its associated Gbeta mimic subunit Gpb2. We also show that the Gpa2 N-terminus binds both to Gpb2 and to the C-terminal tail of the Gpr1 receptor and that Gpb1/2 binding interferes with Gpr1 receptor coupling to Gpa2. Our studies invoke novel mechanisms involving GPCR-G protein modules that may be conserved in multicellular eukaryotes.     

G-protein and cAMP-mediated signaling in aspergilli: a genomic perspective

We have carried out an in silico exploration of the genomes of Aspergillus nidulans, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Aspergillus oryzae, and identified components of G-protein/cAMP-mediated signaling. Putative G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) were distributed over nine classes. The GPCRs within classes were well conserved among aspergilli but varied in other ascomycetes. As previously observed in A. nidulans and other fungi, three Galpha, one Gbeta, and one Ggamma subunits of G proteins were identified in A. fumigatus, whereas an additional likely non-functional Galpha subunit was present in A. oryzae. While most fungal species had five proteins containing the regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) domain predicted to participate in attenuation of G-protein signaling, A. fumigatus and A. oryzae had an additional RGS protein (RgsD) related to RgsA of A. nidulans. Genes encoding adenylate cyclase, a regulatory subunit and two catalytic subunits of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase, were also identified in the three aspergilli. Finally, regulators of cAMP signaling including low- and high-affinity phosphodiesterases were identified. Taken together, our data indicate a striking diversity at the GPCR level, but little diversity of components at the G-protein and cAMP-signaling level. This may reflect the abilities of these fungi to adapt to various ecological niches and to integrate diverse environmental cues into highly conserved cellular processes.     

Activation of mu-opioid receptors transfers control of Galpha subunits to the regulator of G-protein signaling RGS9-2: role in receptor desensitization

In mouse periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) membranes, the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) coprecipitated the alpha-subunits of the Gi/o/z/q/11 proteins, the Gbeta1/2 subunits, and the regulator of G-protein signaling RGS9-2 and its partner protein Gbeta5. RGS7 and RGS11 present in this neural structure showed no association with MOR. In vivo intracerebroventricular injection of morphine did not alter MOR immunoreactivity, but 30 min and 3 h after administration, the coprecipitation of Galpha subunits with MORs was reduced by up to 50%. Furthermore, the association between Galpha subunits and RGS9-2 proteins was increased. Twenty-four hours after receiving intracerebroventricular morphine, the Galpha subunits left the RGS9-2 proteins and re-associated with the MORs. However, doses of the opioid able to induce tolerance promoted the stable transfer of Galpha subunits to the RGS9-2 control. This was accompanied by Ser phosphorylation of RGS9-2 proteins, which increased their co-precipitation with 14-3-3 proteins. In the PAG membranes of morphine-desensitized mice, the capacity of the opioid to stimulate G-protein-related guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thiotriphosphate) binding as well as low Km GTPase activity was attenuated. The in vivo knockdown of RGS9-2 expression prevented morphine from altering the association between MORs and G-proteins, and tolerance did not develop. In PAG membranes from RGS9-2 knockdown mice, morphine showed full capacity to activate G-proteins. Thus, the tolerance that develops following an adequate dose of morphine is caused by the stabilization and retention of MOR-activated Galpha subunits by RGS9-2 proteins. This multistep process is initiated by the morphine-induced transfer of MOR-associated Galpha subunits to the RGS9-2 proteins, followed by Ser phosphorylation of the latter and their binding to 14-3-3 proteins. This regulatory mechanism probably precedes the loss of MORs from the cell membrane, which has been observed with other opioid agonists.