Gbeta residues that do not interact with Galpha underlie agonist-independent activity of K+ channels.

Gbetagamma subunits interact directly and activate G protein-gated Inwardly Rectifying K(+) (GIRK) channels. Little is known about the identity of functionally important interactions between Gbetagamma and GIRK channels. We tested the effects of all mammalian Gbeta subunits on channel activity and showed that whereas Gbeta1-4 subunits activate heteromeric GIRK channels independently of receptor activation, Gbeta5 does not. Gbeta1 and Gbeta5 both bind the N and C termini of the GIRK1 and GIRK4 channel subunits. Chimeric analysis between the Gbeta1 and Gbeta5 proteins revealed a 90-amino acid stretch that spans blades two and three of the seven-propeller structure and is required for channel activation. Within this region, eight non-conserved amino acids were critical for the activity of Gbeta1, as mutation of each residue to its counterpart in Gbeta5 significantly reduced the ability of Gbeta1 to stimulate channel activity. In particular, mutation of residues Ser-67 and Thr-128 to the corresponding Gbeta5 residues completely abolished Gbeta1 stimulation of GIRK channel activity. Mapping these functionally important residues on the three-dimensional structure of Gbeta1 shows that Ser-67, Ser-98, and Thr-128 are the only surface accessible residues. Galpha(i)1 interacts with Ser-98 but not with Ser-67 and Thr-128 in the heterotrimeric Galphabetagamma structure. Further characterization of the three mutant proteins showed that they fold properly and interact with Ggamma2. Of the three identified functionally important residues, the Ser-67 and Thr-128 Gbeta mutants significantly inhibited basal currents of a channel point mutant that displays Gbetagamma-mediated basal but not agonist-induced currents. Our findings indicate that the presence of Gbeta residues that do not interact with Galpha are involved in Gbetagamma interactions in the absence of agonist stimulation.     

Distinct sites on G protein beta gamma subunits regulate different effector functions

G proteins interact with effectors at multiple sites and regulate their activity. The functional significance of multiple contact points is not well understood. We previously identified three residues on distinct surfaces of Gbetagamma that are crucial for G protein-coupled inward rectifier K(+) (GIRK) channel activation. Here we show that mutations at these sites, S67K, S98T, and T128F, abolished or reduced direct GIRK current activation in inside-out patches, but, surprisingly, all mutants synergized with sodium in activating K(+) currents. Each of the three Gbeta(1) mutants bound the channel indicating that the defects reflected mainly functional impairments. We tested these mutants for functional interactions with effectors other than K(+) channels. With N-type calcium channels, Gbetagamma wild type and mutants all inhibited basal currents. A depolarizing pre-pulse relieved Gbetagamma inhibition of Ca(2+) currents by the wild type and the S98T and T128F mutants but not the S67K mutant. Both wild type and mutant Gbetagamma subunits activated phospholipase C beta(2) with similar potencies; however, the S67K mutant showed reduced maximal activity. These data establish a pattern where mutations can alter the Gbetagamma regulation of a specific effector function without affecting other Gbetagamma-mediated functions. Moreover, Ser-67 showed this pattern in all three effectors tested, suggesting that this residue participates in a common functional domain on Gbeta(1) that regulates several effectors. These data show that distinct domains within Gbetagamma subserve specific functional roles.     

Molecular mechanisms mediating inhibition of G protein-coupled inwardly-rectifying K+ channels

Neuronal G protein-coupled inwardly-rectifying potassium channels (GIRKs, Kir3.x) can be activated or inhibited by distinct classes of receptors (Galphai/o and Galphaq/11-coupled, respectively), providing dynamic regulation of neuronal excitability. In this mini-review, we highlight findings from our laboratory in which we used a mammalian heterologous expression system to address mechanisms of GIRK channel regulation by Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits. We found that, like beta1- and beta2-containing Gbetagamma dimers, GIRK channels are also activated by G protein betagamma dimers containing beta3 and beta4 subunits. By contrast, GIRK currents are inhibited by beta5-containing Gbetagamma dimers and/or by Galpha proteins of the Galphaq/11 family. The properties of Gbeta5-mediated inhibition suggest that beta5-containing Gbetagamma dimers act as competitive antagonists of other activating Gbetagamma pairs on GIRK channels. Inhibition of GIRK channels by Galpha subunits is specific to members of the Galphaq/11 family and appears to result, at least in part, from activation of phospholipase C (PLC) and the resultant decrease in membrane levels of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2), an endogenous co-factor necessary for GIRK channel activity; this Galphaq/11 activated mechanism is largely responsible for receptor-mediated GIRK channel inhibition.     

Mapping the Gbetagamma-binding sites in GIRK1 and GIRK2 subunits of the G protein-activated K+ channel

G protein-activated K+ channels (Kir3 or GIRK) are activated by direct binding of Gbetagamma. The binding sites of Gbetagamma in the ubiquitous GIRK1 (Kir3.1) subunit have not been unequivocally charted, and in the neuronal GIRK2 (Kir3.2) subunit the binding of Gbetagamma has not been studied. We verified and extended the map of Gbetagamma-binding sites in GIRK1 by using two approaches: direct binding of Gbetagamma to fragments of GIRK subunits (pull down), and competition of these fragments with the Galphai1 subunit for binding to Gbetagamma. We also mapped the Gbetagamma-binding sites in GIRK2. In both subunits, the N terminus binds Gbetagamma. In the C terminus, the Gbetagamma-binding sites in the two subunits are not identical; GIRK1, but not GIRK2, has a previously unrecognized Gbetagamma-interacting segments in the first half of the C terminus. The main C-terminal Gbetagamma-binding segment found in both subunits is located approximately between amino acids 320 and 409 (by GIRK1 count). Mutation of C-terminal leucines 262 or 333 in GIRK1, recognized previously as crucial for Gbetagamma regulation of the channel, and of the corresponding leucines 273 and 344 in GIRK2 dramatically altered the properties of K+ currents via GIRK1/GIRK2 channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes but did not appreciably reduce the binding of Gbetagamma to the corresponding fusion proteins, indicating that these residues are mainly important for the regulation of Gbetagamma-induced changes in channel gating rather than Gbetagamma binding.     

Co-expression of Gbeta5 enhances the function of two Ggamma subunit-like domain-containing regulators of G protein signaling proteins

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) stimulate the GTPase activity of G protein Galpha subunits and probably play additional roles. Some RGS proteins contain a Ggamma subunit-like (GGL) domain, which mediates a specific interaction with Gbeta5. The role of such interactions in RGS function is unclear. RGS proteins can accelerate the kinetics of coupling of G protein-coupled receptors to G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying K(+) (GIRK) channels. Therefore, we coupled m2-muscarinic acetylcholine receptors to GIRK channels in Xenopus oocytes to evaluate the effect of Gbeta5 on RGS function. Co-expression of either RGS7 or RGS9 modestly accelerated GIRK channel kinetics. When Gbeta5 was co-expressed with either RGS7 or RGS9, the acceleration of GIRK channel kinetics was strongly increased over that produced by RGS7 or RGS9 alone. RGS function was not enhanced by co-expression of Gbeta1, and co-expression of Gbeta5 alone had no effect on GIRK channel kinetics. Gbeta5 did not modulate the function either of RGS4, an RGS protein that lacks a GGL domain, or of a functional RGS7 construct in which the GGL domain was omitted. Enhancement of RGS7 function by Gbeta5 was not a consequence of an increase in the amount of plasma membrane or cytosolic RGS7 protein.     

Role of the chaperonin CCT/TRiC complex in G protein betagamma-dimer assembly

Gbetagamma dimer formation occurs early in the assembly of heterotrimeric G proteins. On nondenaturing (native) gels, in vitro translated, (35)S-labeled Ggamma subunits traveled primarily according to their pI and apparently were not associated with other proteins. In contrast, in vitro translated, (35)S-labeled Gbeta subunits traveled at a high apparent molecular mass (approximately 700 kDa) and co-migrated with the chaperonin CCT complex (also called TRiC). Different FLAG-Gbeta isoforms coprecipitated CCT/TRiC to a variable extent, and this correlated with the ability of the different Gbeta subunits to efficiently form dimers with Ggamma. When translated Ggamma was added to translated Gbeta, a new band of low apparent molecular mass (approximately 50 kDa) was observed, which was labeled by either (35)S-labeled Gbeta or Ggamma, indicating that it is a dimer. Formation of the Gbetagamma dimer was ATP-dependent and inhibited by either adenosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate) or aluminum fluoride in the presence of Mg(2+). This inhibition led to increased association of Gbeta with CCT/TRiC. Although Ggamma did not bind CCT/TRiC, addition of Ggamma to previously synthesized Gbeta caused its release from the CCT/TRiC complex. We conclude that the chaperonin CCT/TRiC complex binds to and folds Gbeta subunits and that CCT/TRiC mediates Gbetagamma dimer formation by an ATP-dependent reaction.     

Mapping of a yeast G protein betagamma signaling interaction.

The mating pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is widely used as a model system for G protein-coupled receptor-mediated signal transduction. Following receptor activation by the binding of mating pheromones, G protein betagamma subunits transmit the signal to a MAP kinase cascade, which involves interaction of Gbeta (Ste4p) with the MAP kinase scaffold protein Ste5p. Here, we identify residues in Ste4p required for the interaction with Ste5p. These residues define a new signaling interface close to the Ste20p binding site within the Gbetagamma coiled-coil. Ste4p mutants defective in the Ste5p interaction interact efficiently with Gpa1p (Galpha) and Ste18p (Ggamma) but cannot function in signal transduction because cells expressing these mutants are sterile. Ste4 L65S is temperature-sensitive for its interaction with Ste5p, and also for signaling. We have identified a Ste5p mutant (L196A) that displays a synthetic interaction defect with Ste4 L65S, providing strong evidence that Ste4p and Ste5p interact directly in vivo through an interface that involves hydrophobic residues. The correlation between disruption of the Ste4p-Ste5p interaction and sterility confirms the importance of this interaction in signal transduction. Identification of the Gbetagamma coiled-coil in Ste5p binding may set a precedent for Gbetagamma-effector interactions in more complex organisms.     

G Protein betagamma dimer formation: Gbeta and Ggamma differentially determine efficiency of in vitro dimer formation

The Gbeta and Ggamma subunit of the heterotrimeric G proteins form a functional dimer that is stable once assembled in vivo or in vitro. The requirements, mechanism, and specificity of dimer formation are still incompletely understood, but represent important biochemical processes involved in the specificity of cellular signaling through G proteins. Here, seven Gbeta and 12 FLAG-epitope-tagged Ggamma subunits were separately synthesized in vitro using a rabbit reticulocyte lysate expression system. The translation products were combined and dimers isolated by immunoprecipitation. Gbeta1 and Gbeta4 formed dimers with all Ggamma subunit isoforms, generally with Gbeta/Ggamma stoichiometries between 0.2:1 and 0.5:1. Gbeta5, Gbeta5L, and Gbeta3s did not form significant amounts of dimer with any of the gamma subunit isoforms. Gbeta2 and Gbeta3 formed dimers with selected Ggamma isoforms to levels intermediate between that of Gbeta1/Gbeta4 and Gbeta3s/Gbeta5/Gbeta5L. We also expressed selected Gbetagamma in HEK293 cells and measured PLCbeta2 activity. Gbetagamma dimer-dependent increases in IP3 production were seen with most Gbeta1, Gbeta2, and Gbeta5 combinations, indicating functional dimer expression in intact cells. These results define the complete set of G protein betagamma dimers that are formed using a single biochemical assay method and suggest that there are Gbeta isoform-specific factors in rabbit reticulocyte lysates that determine the efficacy of Gbetagamma dimer formation.     

G protein beta2 subunit-derived peptides for inhibition and induction of G protein pathways. Examination of voltage-gated Ca2+ and G protein inwardly rectifying K+ channels

Voltage-gated Ca2+ channels of the N-, P/Q-, and R-type and G protein inwardly rectifying K+ channels (GIRK) are modulated via direct binding of G proteins. The modulation is mediated by G protein betagamma subunits. By using electrophysiological recordings and fluorescence resonance energy transfer, we characterized the modulatory domains of the G protein beta subunit on the recombinant P/Q-type channel and GIRK channel expressed in HEK293 cells and on native non-L-type Ca2+ currents of cultured hippocampal neurons. We found that Gbeta2 subunit-derived deletion constructs and synthesized peptides can either induce or inhibit G protein modulation of the examined ion channels. In particular, the 25-amino acid peptide derived from the Gbeta2 N terminus inhibits G protein modulation, whereas a 35-amino acid peptide derived from the Gbeta2 C terminus induced modulation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and GIRK channels. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis of the live action of these peptides revealed that the 25-amino acid peptide diminished the FRET signal between G protein beta2gamma3 subunits, indicating a reorientation between G protein beta2gamma3 subunits in the presence of the peptide. In contrast, the 35-amino acid peptide increased the FRET signal between GIRK1,2 channel subunits, similarly to the Gbetagamma-mediated FRET increase observed for this GIRK subunit combination. Circular dichroism spectra of the synthesized peptides suggest that the 25-amino acid peptide is structured. These results indicate that individual G protein beta subunit domains can act as independent, separate modulatory domains to either induce or inhibit G protein modulation for several effector proteins.     

The C-terminal tail preceding the CAAX box of a yeast G protein gamma subunit is dispensable for receptor-mediated G protein activation in vivo

The gamma subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins are required for receptor-G protein coupling. The C-terminal domains of Ggamma subunits can contact receptors and influence the efficiency of receptor-G protein coupling in vitro. However, it is unknown whether receptor interaction with the C terminus of Ggamma is required for signaling in vivo. To address this question, we cloned Ggamma homologs with diverged C-terminal sequences from five species of budding yeast. Each Ggamma homolog functionally replaced the Ggamma subunit of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (STE18 gene product). Mutagenesis of S. cerevisiae Ste18 likewise indicated that specific C-terminal sequence motifs are not required for signaling. Strikingly, an internal in-frame deletion removing sequences preceding the C-terminal CAAX box of Ste18 did not impair signaling by either of its cognate G protein-coupled pheromone receptors. Therefore, receptor interaction with the C-terminal domain of yeast Ggamma is not required for receptor-mediated G protein activation in vivo. Because the mechanism of G protein activation by receptors is conserved from yeast to humans, mammalian receptors may not require interaction with the tail of Ggamma for G protein activation in vivo. However, receptor-Ggamma interaction may modulate the efficiency of receptor-G protein coupling or promote activation of Gbetagamma effectors that co-cluster with receptors.     

Yeast screen for constitutively active mutant G protein-activated potassium channels

GIRK2 is a major contributor to G protein-activated inward rectifier potassium channels in the mammalian brain. How GIRK channels open upon contact with Gbetagamma remains unknown. Using a yeast genetic screen to select constitutively active mutants from a randomly mutagenized GIRK2 library, we identified five gating mutations at four residues in the transmembrane domain. Further mutagenesis indicates that GIRK channel opening involves a rotation of the transmembrane segments, bringing one of these residues (V188) to a pore-lining position in the open conformation. Combined with double-mutant studies, these findings suggest that GIRK channels gate by moving from the open conformation inferred from our yeast study of Kir2.1 to a closed conformation perhaps resembling the known KcsA structure.     

Gbetagamma subunit combinations differentially modulate receptor and effector coupling in vivo

In vitro, little specificity is seen for modulation of effectors by different combinations of Gbetagamma subunits from heterotrimeric G proteins. Here, we demonstrate that the coupling of specific combinations of Gbetagamma subunits to different receptors leads to a differential ability to modulate effectors in vivo. We have shown that the beta(1)AR and beta(2)AR can activate homomultimers of the human inwardly rectifying potassium channel Kir 3.2 when coexpressed in Xenopus oocytes, and that this requires a functional mammalian Gs heterotrimer. Modulation was independent of cAMP production, suggesting a membrane-delimited mechanism. To analyze further the importance of different Gbetagamma combinations, we have tested the facilitation of Kir 3.2 activation by betaAR mediated by different Gbetagamma subunits. The subunits tested were Gbeta(1,5) and Ggamma(1,2,7,11). These experiments demonstrated significant variation between the ability of the Gbetagamma combinations to activate the channels after receptor stimulation. This was in marked contrast to the situation in vitro where little specificity for binding of a Kir 3.1 C-terminal GST fusion protein by different Gbetagamma combinations was detected. More importantly, neither receptor, although homologous both structurally and functionally, shared the same preference for Gbetagamma subunits. In the presence of beta(1)AR, Gbeta(5)gamma(1) and Gbeta(5)gamma(11) activated Kir 3.2 to the greatest extent, while for the beta(2)AR, Gbeta(1)gamma(7), Gbeta(1)gamma(11,) and Gbeta(5)gamma(2) produced the greatest responses. Interestingly, no preference was seen in the ability of different Gbetagamma subunits to facilitate receptor-stimulated GTPase activity of the Gsalpha. These results suggest that it is not the receptor/G protein alpha subunit interaction or the Gbetagamma/effector interaction that is altered by Gbetagamma, but rather that the ability of the receptor to interact productively with the Gbetagamma subunit directly and/or the G protein/effector complex is dependent on the specific G protein heterotrimer associated with the receptor.     

Identification of a potassium channel site that interacts with G protein betagamma subunits to mediate agonist-induced signaling

Activation of heterotrimeric GTP-binding (G) proteins by their coupled receptors, causes dissociation of the G protein alpha and betagamma subunits. Gbetagamma subunits interact directly with G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK) channels to stimulate their activity. In addition, free Gbetagamma subunits, resulting from agonist-independent dissociation of G protein subunits, can account for a major component of the basal channel activity. Using a series of chimeric constructs between GIRK4 and a Gbetagamma-insensitive K+ channel, IRK1, we have identified a critical site of interaction of GIRK with Gbetagamma. Mutation of Leu339 to Glu within this site impaired agonist-induced sensitivity and decreased binding to Gbetagamma, without removing the Gbetagamma contribution to basal currents. Mutation of the corresponding residue in GIRK1 (Leu333) resulted in a similar phenotype. Both the GIRK1 and GIRK4 subunits contributed equally to the agonist-induced sensitivity of the heteromultimeric channel. Thus, we have identified a channel site that interacts specifically with Gbetagamma subunits released through receptor stimulation.     

Characterization of the Arabidopsis heterotrimeric G protein

We have used fluorescence resonance energy transfer and co-immunoprecipitation to analyze the interactions among the alpha, beta, and gamma1 subunits of the Arabidopsis heterotrimeric G protein. Using cyan and yellow fluorescent protein fusion constructs, we show that overexpressed Ggamma1 localizes to protoplast membranes, but Gbeta exhibits membrane localization only when the Ggamma1 protein is co-overexpressed. Overexpressed Galpha shows membrane localization unaccompanied by overexpression of either Gbeta or Ggamma1. We detect fluorescence resonance energy transfer between Gbeta and Ggamma1 in the absence of Galpha overexpression and between Galpha and Ggamma1 but only when all three subunits are co-overexpressed. Both Galpha and Gbeta are associated with large macromolecular complexes of approximately 700 kDa in the plasma membrane. Galpha is present in both large complexes and as free Galpha in plasma membranes from wild type plants. In plants homozygous for a null allele of the Gbeta gene, Galpha is associated with smaller complexes in the 200-400-kDa range, indicating that its presence in the large complex depends on association with Gbetagamma. Activation of the Galpha subunit with guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) results in partial dissociation of Galpha from the complex. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) promotes extensive dissociation of the Galpha complex but does not interfere with binding of GTPgammaS to purified recombinant Galpha, suggesting that reactive oxygen species affect the stability of the large complex but not the activity of Galpha itself.     

The sensitivity of G protein-activated K+ channels toward halothane is essentially determined by the C terminus

G protein-activated K(+) channels (GIRKs or Kir3.x) are targets for the volatile anesthetic, halothane. When coexpressed with the m(2) acetylcholine (ACh) receptor in Xenopus oocytes, agonist-activated GIRK1(F137S)- and GIRK2-mediated currents are inhibited by halothane, whereas in the absence of ACh, high concentrations of halothane induce GIRK1(F137S)-mediated currents. To elucidate the molecular mechanism of halothane action on GIRK currents of different subunit compositions, we constructed deletion mutants of GIRK1(F137S) (GIRK1(Delta363*)) and GIRK2 (GIRK2(Delta356)) lacking the C-terminal ends, as well as chimeric GIRK channels. Mutated GIRK channels showed normal currents when activated by ACh but exhibited different pharmacological properties toward halothane. GIRK2(Delta356) showed no sensitivity against the inhibitory action of halothane but was activated by halothane in the absence of an agonist. GIRK1(Delta363*) was activated by halothane more efficiently. Currents mediated by chimeric channels were inhibited by anesthetic concentrations that were at least 30-fold lower than those necessary to decrease GIRK2 wild type currents. Glutathione S-transferase pulldown experiments did not show displacement of bound Gbetagamma by halothane, indicating that halothane does not interfere with Gbetagamma binding. Single channel experiments revealed an influence of halothane on the gating of the channels: The agonist-induced currents of GIRK1 and GIRK2, carried mainly by brief openings, were inhibited, whereas higher concentrations of the anesthetic promoted long openings of GIRK1 channels. Because the C terminus is crucial for these effects, an interaction of halothane with the channel seems to be involved in the mechanism of current modulation.     

Heterotrimeric G protein gamma subunits provide functional selectivity in Gbetagamma dimer signaling in Arabidopsis

The Arabidopsis thaliana heterotrimeric G protein complex is encoded by single canonical Galpha and Gbeta subunit genes and two Ggamma subunit genes (AGG1 and AGG2), raising the possibility that the two potential G protein complexes mediate different cellular processes. Mutants with reduced expression of one or both Ggamma genes revealed specialized roles for each Ggamma subunit. AGG1-deficient mutants, but not AGG2-deficient mutants, showed impaired resistance against necrotrophic pathogens, reduced induction of the plant defensin gene PDF1.2, and decreased sensitivity to methyl jasmonate. By contrast, both AGG1- and AGG2-deficient mutants were hypersensitive to auxin-mediated induction of lateral roots, suggesting that Gbetagamma1 and Gbetagamma2 synergistically inhibit auxin-dependent lateral root initiation. However, the involvement of each Ggamma subunit in this root response differs, with Gbetagamma1 acting within the central cylinder, attenuating acropetally transported auxin signaling, while Gbetagamma2 affects the action of basipetal auxin and graviresponsiveness within the epidermis and/or cortex. This selectivity also operates in the hypocotyl. Selectivity in Gbetagamma signaling was also found in other known AGB1-mediated pathways. agg1 mutants were hypersensitive to glucose and the osmotic agent mannitol during seed germination, while agg2 mutants were only affected by glucose. We show that both Ggamma subunits form functional Gbetagamma dimers and that each provides functional selectivity to the plant heterotrimeric G proteins, revealing a mechanism underlying the complexity of G protein-mediated signaling in plants.     

Functional and biochemical evidence for G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK) channels composed of GIRK2 and GIRK3

G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying K(+) (GIRK) channels are widely expressed in the brain and are activated by at least eight different neurotransmitters. As K(+) channels, they drive the transmembrane potential toward E(K) when open and thus dampen neuronal excitability. There are four mammalian GIRK subunits (GIRK1-4 or Kir 3.1-4), with GIRK1 being the most unique of the four by possessing a long carboxyl-terminal tail. Early studies suggested that GIRK1 was an integral component of native GIRK channels. However, more recent data indicate that native channels can be either homo- or heterotetrameric complexes composed of several GIRK subunit combinations. The functional implications of subunit composition are poorly understood at present. The purpose of this study was to examine the functional and biochemical properties of GIRK channels formed by the co-assembly of GIRK2 and GIRK3, the most abundant GIRK subunits found in the mammalian brain. To examine the properties of a channel composed of these two subunits, we co-transfected GIRK2 and GIRK3 in CHO-K1 cells and assayed the cells for channel activity by patch clamp. The most significant difference between the putative GIRK2/GIRK3 heteromultimeric channel and GIRK1/GIRKx channels at the single channel level was an approximately 5-fold lower sensitivity to activation by Gbetagamma. Complexes containing only GIRK2 and GIRK3 could be immunoprecipitated from transfected cells and could be purified from native brain tissue. These data indicate that functional GIRK channels composed of GIRK2 and GIRK3 subunits exist in brain.     

A single Gbeta subunit locus controls cross-talk between protein kinase C and G protein regulation of N-type calcium channels

The modulation of N-type calcium channels is a key factor in the control of neurotransmitter release. Whereas N-type channels are inhibited by Gbetagamma subunits in a G protein beta-isoform-dependent manner, channel activity is typically stimulated by activation of protein kinase C (PKC). In addition, there is cross-talk among these pathways, such that PKC-dependent phosphorylation of the Gbetagamma target site on the N-type channel antagonizes subsequent G protein inhibition, albeit only for Gbeta(1)-mediated responses. The molecular mechanisms that control this G protein beta subunit subtype-specific regulation have not been described. Here, we show that G protein inhibition of N-type calcium channels is critically dependent on two separate but adjacent approximately 20-amino acid regions of the Gbeta subunit, plus a highly conserved Asn-Tyr-Val motif. These regions are distinct from those implicated previously in Gbetagamma signaling to other effectors such as G protein-coupled inward rectifier potassium channels, phospholipase beta(2), and adenylyl cyclase, thus raising the possibility that the specificity for G protein signaling to calcium channels might rely on unique G protein structural determinants. In addition, we identify a highly specific locus on the Gbeta(1) subunit that serves as a molecular detector of PKC-dependent phosphorylation of the G protein target site on the N-type channel alpha(1) subunit, thus providing for a molecular basis for G protein-PKC cross-talk. Overall, our results significantly advance our understanding of the molecular details underlying the integration of G protein and PKC signaling pathways at the level of the N-type calcium channel alpha(1) subunit.     

Adenylyl cyclase type-VIII activity is regulated by G(betagamma) subunits

The Ca2+-activated adenylyl cyclase type VIII (AC-VIII) has been implicated in several forms of neural plasticity, including drug addiction and learning and memory. It has not been clear whether Gi/o proteins and G-protein coupled receptors regulate the activity of AC-VIII. Here we show in intact mammalian cell system that AC-VIII is inhibited by mu-opioid receptor activation and that this inhibition is pertussis toxin sensitive. Moreover, we show that G(betagamma) subunits inhibit AC-VIII activity, while constitutively active alphai/o subunits do not. Different Gbeta isoforms varied in their efficacies, with Gbeta1gamma2 or Gbeta2gamma2 being more efficient than Gbeta3gamma2 and Gbeta4gamma2, while Gbeta5 (transfected with gamma2) had no effect. As for the Ggamma subunits, Gbeta1 inhibited AC-VIII activity in the presence of all gamma subunits tested except for gamma5 that had only a marginal activity. Moreover, cotransfection with proteins known to serve as scavengers of Gbetagamma dimers, or to reduce Gbetagamma plasma membrane anchorage, markedly attenuated the mu-opioid receptor-induced inhibition of AC-VIII. These results demonstrate that Gbetagamma (originating from agonist activation of these receptors) and probably not Galphai/o subunits are involved in the agonist inhibition of AC-VIII.