Oncolytic Immunotherapy: Can’t Start a Fire Without a Spark

Recent advances in cancer immunotherapy have renewed interest in oncolytic viruses (OVs) as a synergistic platform for the development of novel antitumor strategies. Cancer cells adopt multiple mechanisms to evade and suppress antitumor immune responses, essentially establishing a non-immunogenic (‘cold’) tumor microenvironment (TME), with poor T-cell infiltration and low mutational burden. Limitations to the efficacy of immunotherapy still exist, especially for a variety of solid tumors, where new approaches are necessary to overcome physical barriers in the TME and to mitigate adverse effects associated with current immunotherapeutics. OVs offer an attractive alternative by inducing direct oncolysis, immunogenic cell death, and immune stimulation. These multimodal mechanisms make OVs well suited to reprogram non-immunogenic tumors and TME into inflamed, immunogenic (‘hot’) tumors; enhanced release of tumor antigens by dying cancer cells is expected to augment T-cell infiltration, thereby eliciting potent antitumor immunity. Advances in virus engineering and understanding of tumor biology have allowed the optimization of OV-tumor selectivity, oncolytic potency, and immune stimulation. However, OV antitumor activity is likely to achieve its greatest potential as part of combinatorial strategies with other immune or cancer therapeutics.     

CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes in cancer immunotherapy: A review

CD8⁺ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are preferred immune cells for targeting cancer. During cancer progression, CTLs encounter dysfunction and exhaustion due to immunerelated tolerance and immunosuppression within the tumor microenvironment (TME), with all favor adaptive immune-resistance. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), macrophage type 2 (M2) cells, and regulatory T cells (Tregs) could make immunologic barriers against CD8 ⁺ T cell-mediated antitumor immune responses. Thus, CD8 ⁺ T cells are needed to be primed and activated toward effector CTLs in a process called tumor immunity cycle for making durable and efficient antitumor immune responses. The CD8 ⁺ T cell priming is directed essentially as a corroboration work between cells of innate immunity including dendritic cells (DCs) and natural killer (NK) cells with CD4 ⁺ T cells in adoptive immunity. Upon activation, effector CTLs infiltrate to the core or invading site of the tumor (so-called infiltrated–inflamed [I–I] TME) and take essential roles for killing cancer cells. Exogenous reactivation and/or priming of CD8 ⁺ T cells can be possible using rational immunotherapy strategies. The increase of the ratio for costimulatory to coinhibitory mediators using immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) approach. Programmed death-1 receptor (PD-1)–ligand (PD-L1) and CTL-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) are checkpoint receptors that can be targeted for relieving exhaustion of CD8 ⁺ T cells and renewing their priming, respectively, and thereby eliminating antigen-expressing cancer cells. Due to a diverse relation between CTLs with Tregs, the Treg activity could be dampened for increasing the number and rescuing the functional potential of CTLs to induce immunosensitivity of cancer cells.     

The combination therapy of oncolytic HSV-1 armed with anti-PD-1 antibody and IL-12 enhances anti-tumor efficacy

Cancer immunotherapy is a new therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment that targets tumors by improving or restoring immune system function. Therapies targeting immune checkpoint molecules have exerted potent anti-tumor effects and prolonged the overall survival rate of patients. However, only a small number of patients benefit from the treatment. Oncolytic viruses exert anti-tumor effects by regulating the tumor microenvironment and affecting multiple steps of tumor immune circulation. In this study, we engineered two oncolytic viruses that express mouse anti-PD-1 antibody (VT1093M) or mouse IL-12 (VT1092M). We found that both oncolytic viruses showed significant anti-tumor effects in a murine CT26 colon adenocarcinoma model. Importantly, the intratumoral combined injection with VT1092M and VT1093M inhibited growth of the primary tumor, prevented growth of the contralateral untreated tumor, produced a vaccine-like response, activated antigen-specific T cell responses and prolonged the overall survival rate of mice. These results indicate that combination therapy with the engineered oncolytic virus may represent a potent immunotherapy strategy for cancer patients, especially those resistant to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy.     

Vesicular stomatitis virus sensitizes immunologically cold tumors to checkpoint blockade by inducing pyroptosis

BackgroundTraditionally, vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and other oncolytic viruses (OVs) are thought to kill tumors by inducing apoptosis. However, cell apoptosis leads to immune quiescence, which is incompatible with the ability of OVs to activate the antitumor immune microenvironment. Thus, studying OVs-mediated oncolytic mechanisms is of great importance for the clinical application of OVs.MethodsWe examined the pyroptosis in tumor cells and tissues by morphological observation, Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) assay, frozen section observation, and western-blotting techniques. The critical role of GSDME in VSV-induced pyroptosis was confirmed by CRISPR/Cas9 technique. VSV virotherapy-recruited cytotoxic lymphocytes in the tumors were examined by flow cytometry assay. VSV-activated antitumor immunity was further enhanced by the co-administration with anti-PD-1 antibody.ResultsHere, we observed that VSV was able to trigger tumor pyroptosis through Gasdermin E (GSDME) in tumor cells, human tumor samples, and tumor-bearing mouse models. Importantly, the effectiveness of VSV-based virotherapy is highly dependent on GSDME, as depletion of GSDME not only reverses VSV-induced tumor-suppressive effects but also diminishes the ability of VSV to activate antitumor immunity. Notably, VSV treatment makes immunologically ‘cold’ tumors more sensitive to checkpoint blockade.ConclusionsOncolytic VSV induces tumor cell pyroptosis by activating GSDME. GSDME is critical in recruiting cytotoxic T lymphocytes in the context of VSV therapy, which can switch immunologically ‘cold’ tumors into ‘hot’ and enhance immune checkpoint therapy efficacy.     

Resistance to Checkpoint Inhibition in Cancer Immunotherapy

The interaction of the host immune system with tumor cells in the tissue microenvironment is essential in understanding tumor immunity and development of successful cancer immunotherapy. The presence of lymphocytes in tumors is highly correlated with an improved outcome. T cells have a set of cell surface receptors termed immune checkpoints that when activated suppress T cell function. Upregulation of immune checkpoint receptors such as programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) occurs during T cell activation in an effort to prevent damage from an excessive immune response. Immune checkpoint inhibitors allow the adaptive immune system to respond to tumors more effectively. There has been clinical success in different types of cancer blocking immune checkpoint receptors such as PD-1 and CTLA. However, relapse has occurred. The innate and acquired/therapy induced resistance to treatment has been encountered. Aberrant cellular signal transduction is a major contributing factor to resistance to immunotherapy. Combination therapies with other co-inhibitory immune checkpoints such as TIM-3, LAG3 and VISTA are currently being tested to overcome resistance to cancer immunotherapy. Expression of TIM-3 has been associated with resistance to PD-1 blockade and combined blockade of TIM-3 and PD-1 has demonstrated improved responses in preclinical models. LAG3 blockade has the potential to increase the responsiveness of cytotoxic T-cells to tumors. Furthermore, tumors that were found to express VISTA had an increased rate of growth due to the T cell suppression. The growing understanding of the inhibitory immune checkpoints’ ligand biology, signaling mechanisms, and T-cell suppression in the tumor microenvironment continues to fuel preclinical and clinical advancements in design, testing, and approval of agents that block checkpoint molecules. Our review seeks to bridge fundamental regulatory mechanisms across inhibitory immune checkpoint receptors that are of great importance in resistance to cancer immunotherapy. We will summarize the biology of different checkpoint molecules, highlight the effect of individual checkpoint inhibition as anti-tumor therapies, and outline the literatures that explore mechanisms of resistance to individual checkpoint inhibition pathways.     

Immune Checkpoint Blockade Augments Changes Within Oncolytic Virus-induced Cancer MHC-I Peptidome,Creating Novel Antitumor CD8 T Cell Reactivities

The combination cancer immunotherapies with oncolytic virus (OV) and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) reinstate otherwise dysfunctional antitumor CD8 T cell responses. One major mechanism that aids such reinstatement of antitumor CD8 T cells involves the availability of new class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC-I)-bound tumor epitopes following therapeutic intervention. Thus, therapy-induced changes within the MHC-I peptidome hold the key to understanding the clinical implications for therapy-reinstated CD8 T cell responses. Here, using mass spectrometry–based immuno-affinity methods and tumor-bearing animals treated with OV and ICB (alone or in combination), we captured the therapy-induced alterations within the tumor MHC-I peptidome, which were then tested for their CD8 T cell response-stimulating activity. We found that the oncolytic reovirus monotherapy drives up- as well as downexpression of tumor MHC-I peptides in a cancer type and oncolysis susceptibility dependent manner. Interestingly, the combination of reovirus + ICB results in higher numbers of differentially expressed MHC-I-associated peptides (DEMHCPs) relative to either monotherapies. Most importantly, OV+ICB-driven DEMHCPs contain biologically active epitopes that stimulate interferon-gamma responses in cognate CD8 T cells, which may mediate clinically desired antitumor attack and cancer immunoediting. These findings highlight that the therapy-induced changes to the MHC-I peptidome contribute toward the reinstated antitumor CD8 T cell attack established following OV + ICB combination cancer immunotherapy.     

Lung cancer and oncolytic virotherapy——enemy's enemy

Lung cancer is one of the malignant tumors that seriously threaten human health worldwide, while the covid-19 virus has become people's nightmare after the coronavirus pandemic. There are too many similarities between cancer cells and viruses, one of the most significant is that both of them are our enemies. The strategy to take the advantage of the virus to beat cancer cells is called Oncolytic virotherapy. When immunotherapy represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors has made remarkable breakthroughs in the clinical practice of lung cancer, the induction of antitumor immunity from immune cells gradually becomes a rapidly developing and promising strategy of cancer therapy. Oncolytic virotherapy is based on the same mechanisms that selectively kill tumor cells and induce systemic anti-tumor immunity, but still has a long way to go before it becomes a standard treatment for lung cancer. This article provides a comprehensive review of the latest progress in oncolytic virotherapy for lung cancer, including the specific mechanism of oncolytic virus therapy and the main types of oncolytic viruses, and the combination of oncolytic virotherapy and existing standard treatments. It aims to provide new insights and ideas on oncolytic virotherapy for lung cancer.     

NHS-IL12 and bintrafusp alfa combination therapy enhances antitumor activity in preclinical cancer models

Combinatorial immunotherapy approaches are emerging as viable cancer therapeutic strategies for improving patient responses and outcomes. This study investigated whether two such immunotherapies, with complementary mechanisms of action, could enhance antitumor activity in murine tumor models. The immunocytokine NHS-IL12, and surrogate NHS-muIL12, are designed to deliver IL-12 and muIL-12, respectively, to the tumor microenvironment (TME) to activate NK cells and CD8⁺ T cells and increase their cytotoxic functions. Bintrafusp alfa (BA) is a bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domains of the TGF-β receptor II to function as a TGF-β “trap” fused to a human IgG1 antibody blocking PD-L1. With this dual-targeting strategy, BA enhances efficacy over that of monotherapies in preclinical studies. In this study, NHS-muIL12 and BA combination therapy enhanced antitumor activity, prolonged survival, and induced tumor-specific antitumor immunity. This combination therapy increased tumor-specific CD8⁺ T cells and induced immune profiles, consistent with the activation of both adaptive and innate immune systems. In addition, BA reduced lung metastasis in the 4T1 model. Collectively, these findings could support clinical trials designed to investigate NHS-IL12 and BA combination therapy for patients with advanced solid tumors     

溶瘤病毒的免疫学机制及临床研究进展

溶瘤病毒（oncolytic virus,OVs）历经百年发展,应用于当前最具潜力的肿瘤免疫疗法。它主要是天然的或基因修饰的DNA病毒和RNA病毒。近年来随着基因工程技术的飞跃发展,经基因改造的溶瘤病毒在肿瘤治疗领域取得很大进展,很多不同类型的病毒（包括单纯疱疹病毒、腺病毒、痘病毒、麻疹病毒和呼肠孤病毒等）正处于临床前研究、临床试验阶段或已批准上市,显示了良好的安全性和临床疗效。普遍认为溶瘤病毒靶向杀伤肿瘤细胞是通过选择性在肿瘤细胞内自我复制,最终裂解肿瘤细胞,同时可激发机体的免疫应答反应,进而增强抗肿瘤免疫效果,靶向杀伤肿瘤细胞而对正常细胞无明显影响。运用基因重组技术将溶瘤病毒与免疫检查点相结合以及肿瘤免疫联合疗法的兴起和不断进步,使溶瘤病毒的应用更加广泛,但仍存在病毒靶向性、安全性、给药途径等瓶颈问题。本文综述了溶瘤病毒的发展史、病毒分类、不同类型溶瘤病毒产品的临床研究进展、溶瘤病毒靶向杀伤肿瘤的免疫学机制及未来发展面临的挑战与展望等。     

Immune checkpoint blockade impairs immunosuppressive mechanisms of regulatory T cells in B-cell lymphoma

In malignant disease, CD4⁺Foxp3⁺ regulatory T cells (Tregs) hamper antitumor immune responses and may provide a target for immunotherapy. Although immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has become an established therapy for several cancer entities including lymphoma, its mechanisms have not been entirely uncovered. Using endogenously arising λ-MYC-transgenic mouse B-cell lymphomas, which can effectively be suppressed by either Treg ablation or ICB, we investigated which mechanisms are used by Tregs to suppress antitumor responses and how ICB affects these pathways. During tumor development, Tregs up-regulated Foxp3, CD25, CTLA-4 and IL-10, which correlated with enhanced immunosuppressive functions. Thus, in contrast to other tumors, Tregs did not become dysfunctional despite chronic stimulation in the tumor microenvironment and progressive up-regulation of PD-1. Immunosuppression was mediated by direct contacts between Tregs and effector T cells and by IL-10. When λ-MYC mice were treated with ICB antibodies, Tregs revealed a less profound up-regulation of Foxp3, CD25 and IL-10 and a decreased suppressive capacity. This may be due to the shift towards a pro-inflammatory milieu fostered by ICB. In summary, an ICB-induced interference with Treg-dependent immunosuppression may contribute to the success of ICB.     

溶瘤病毒靶向治疗肿瘤的策略

近年来,随着国内外几款溶瘤病毒制剂的相继上市,溶瘤病毒疗法成为肿瘤免疫治疗的焦点。溶瘤病毒可选择性感染并裂解肿瘤细胞,同时释放肿瘤相关抗原激活机体的抗肿瘤免疫反应,达到杀伤肿瘤细胞和抑制肿瘤生长的目的。溶瘤病毒对肿瘤的靶向杀伤作用决定了其安全性和溶瘤效果。为了开发出安全高效的溶瘤病毒,目前主要采用以下策略：利用某些病毒载体对肿瘤细胞的天然靶向性,使溶瘤病毒选择性地在肿瘤细胞内复制并杀伤肿瘤细胞;或者对病毒基因组进行缺失和插入等修饰,通过靶向肿瘤细胞特异性表面受体、胞内信号通路或者肿瘤微环境等提高溶瘤病毒的肿瘤靶向性。其中,肿瘤微环境中的低氧状态、新血管生成以及免疫抑制状态等都可成为溶瘤病毒的靶点。而溶瘤病毒通过表达细胞因子和免疫检查点抑制剂,或者与CAR-T细胞联合作用,靶向调节肿瘤微环境中免疫抑制状态,成为提高溶瘤病毒肿瘤靶向性的常用方法。本文将对以上溶瘤病毒靶向治疗肿瘤策略的研究进展进行综述。     

Innovative Therapy,Monoclonal Antibodies and Beyond

The seventh Edition of “Innovative Therapy, Monoclonal Antibodies and Beyond” Meeting took place in Milan, Italy, on January 27, 2017. The two sessions of the meeting were focused on: 1) Preclinical assays and novel biotargets; and 2) monoclonal antibodies, cell therapies and targeted molecules. Between these two sessions, a lecture entitled “HLA-antigens modulation and response to immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy” was also presented. Despite the impressive successes in cancer immunotherapy in recent years, the response to immune based interventions occurs only in a minority of patients (∼20%). Several basic and translational mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) were discussed during the meeting: 1. the impact of tumor microenvironment on the activity of immune system; 2. strategies to inhibit the cross-talk between extracellular matrix and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) in the preclinical setting; 3. microRNA expression as a biomarker and as a target of therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); 4. the significance of complement activation pathways in response to immune checkpoint inhibitors; 5. the immunosuppressive activity of the microbiota by inducing IL-17 producing cells; and 6. modulation of HLA antigens as possible markers of response to ICB therapy. In order to overcome the deficiency in active anti-tumor T cells, several clinically applicable combination strategies were also discussed: 1. strategies to enhance the anticancer effects of immunogenic cell death inducing-chemotherapy; 2. the use of CAR T-cells in solid tumors; 3. the use of combination strategies involving oncolytic viruses and ICBs; 4. combinations of new ICBs with anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 therapy; and 4. combinations of targeted therapies and ICBs in melanoma. Overall, this conference emphasized the many novel strategies that are being investigated to improve the overall patient response to cancer immunotherapy. Optimization of biomarkers to accurately select patients who will respond to immunotherapy, coupled with combination strategies to improve long term patient survival remain critical challenges in the immuno-oncology field.     

Harnessing NK cells for cancer immunotherapy: immune checkpoint receptors and chimeric antigen receptors

Natural killer (NK) cells, key antitumor effectors of the innate immune system, are endowed with the unique ability to spontaneously eliminate cells undergoing a neoplastic transformation. Given their broad reactivity against diverse types of cancer and close association with cancer prognosis, NK cells have gained considerable attention as a promising therapeutic target for cancer immunotherapy. NK cell-based therapies have demonstrated favorable clinical efficacies in several hematological malignancies but limited success in solid tumors, thus highlighting the need to develop new therapeutic strategies to restore and optimize antitumor activity while preventing tumor immune escape. The current therapeutic modalities yielding encouraging results in clinical trials include the blockade of immune checkpoint receptors to overcome the immune-evasion mechanism used by tumors and the incorporation of tumor-directed chimeric antigen receptors to enhance NK cell antitumor specificity and activity. These observations, together with recent advances in the understanding of NK cell activation within the tumor microenvironment, will facilitate the optimal design of NK cell-based therapy against a broad range of cancers and, more desirably, refractory cancers.     

Radiation combines with immune checkpoint blockade to enhance T cell priming in a murine model of poorly immunogenic pancreatic cancer

Radiation has been a pillar of cancer therapy for decades. The effects of radiation on the anti-tumour immune response are variable across studies and have not been explicitly defined in poorly immunogenic tumour types. Here, we employed combination checkpoint blockade immunotherapy with stereotactic body radiation therapy and examined the effect on tumour growth and immune infiltrates in subcutaneous and orthotopic mouse models of pancreatic cancer. Although immune checkpoint blockade and radiation were ineffective alone, their combination produced a modest growth delay in both irradiated and non-irradiated tumours that corresponded with significant increases in CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells and tumour-specific T cells as identified by IFNγ ELISpot. We conclude that radiation enhances priming of tumour-specific T cells in poorly immunogenic tumours and that the frequency of these T cells can be further increased by combination with immune checkpoint blockade.     

Oncolytic herpes simplex virus 1 encoding 15-prostaglandin dehydrogenase mitigates immune suppression and reduces ectopic primary and metastatic breast cancer in mice

Oncolytic herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) viruses armed with immunomodulatory transgenes have shown potential for enhanced antitumor therapy by overcoming tumor-based immune suppression and promoting antitumor effector cell development. Previously, we reported that the new oncolytic HSV-1 virus, OncSyn (OS), engineered to fuse tumor cells, prevented tumor growth and metastasis to distal organs in the 4T1/BALB/c immunocompetent breast cancer mouse model, suggesting the elicitation of antitumor immune responses (Israyelyan et al., Hum. Gen. Ther. 18:5, 2007, and Israyelyan et al., Virol. J. 5:68, 2008). The OSV virus was constructed by deleting the OS viral host shutoff gene (vhs; UL41) to further attenuate the virus and permit dendritic cell activation and antigen presentation. Subsequently, the OSVP virus was constructed by inserting into the OSV viral genome a murine 15-prostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) expression cassette, designed to constitutively express 15-PGDH upon infection. 15-PGDH is a tumor suppressor protein and the primary enzyme responsible for the degradation of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), which is known to promote tumor development. OSVP, OSV, and OS treatment of 4T1 tumors in BALB/c mice effectively reduced primary tumor growth and inhibited metastatic development of secondary tumors. OSVP was able to significantly inhibit the development and accumulation of 4T1 metastatic tumor cells in the lungs of treated mice. Ex vivo analysis of immune cells following treatment showed increased inflammatory cytokine production and the presence of mature dendritic cells for the OSVP, OSV, and OS viruses. A statistically significant decrease in splenic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) was observed only for OSVP-treated mice. These results show that intratumoral oncolytic herpes is highly immunogenic and suggest that 15-PGDH expression by OSVP enhanced the antitumor immune response initiated by viral infection of primary tumor cells, leading to reduced development of pulmonary metastases. The availability of the OSVP genome as a bacterial artificial chromosome allows for the rapid insertion of additional immunomodulatory genes that could further assist in the induction of potent antitumor immune responses against primary and metastatic tumors.     

Oncolytic virotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A glimmer of hope after years of disappointment?

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive and highly lethal malignancies. Existing therapeutic interventions have so far been unsuccessful in improving prognosis, and survival remains very poor. Oncolytic virotherapy represents a promising, yet not fully explored, alternative strategy for the treatment of PDAC. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) infect, replicate within and lyse tumor cells specifically and stimulate antitumor immune responses. Multiple challenges have hampered the efficacy of oncolytic virotherapy for PDAC, the most significant being the desmoplastic and immunosuppressive pancreatic tumor microenvironment (TME). The TME limits the access of therapeutic drugs and the infiltration of effector T cells and natural killer (NK) cells into the tumor mass. Additionally, cancer cells promote the secretion of immunosuppressive factors and develop mechanisms to evade the host immune system. Because of their oncolytic and immune-stimulating properties, OVs are the ideal candidates for counteracting the pancreatic immunosuppressive TME and for designing combination therapies that can be clinically exploited in clinical trials that seek to improve the prognosis of PDAC.     

The roles of mast cells in anticancer immunity

The tumor microenvironment (TME), which is composed of stromal cells such as endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and immune cells, provides a supportive niche promoting the growth and invasion of tumors. The TME also raises an immunosuppressive barrier to effective antitumor immune responses and is therefore emerging as a target for cancer immunotherapies. Mast cells (MCs) accumulate in the TME at early stages, and their presence in the TME is associated with poor prognosis in many aggressive human cancers. Some well-established roles of MCs in cancer are promoting angiogenesis and tumor invasion into surrounding tissues. Several mouse models of inducible and spontaneous cancer show that MCs are among the first immune cells to accumulate within and shape the TME. Although MCs and other suppressive myeloid cells are associated with poor prognosis in human cancers, high densities of intratumoral T effector (T(eff)) cells are associated with a favorable prognosis. The latter finding has stimulated interest in developing therapies to increase intratumoral T cell density. However, cellular and molecular mechanisms promoting high densities of intratumoral T(eff) cells within the TME are poorly understood. New evidence suggests that MCs are essential for shaping the immune-suppressive TME and impairing both antitumor T(eff) cell responses and intratumoral T cell accumulation. These roles for MCs warrant further elucidation in order to improve antitumor immunity. Here, we will summarize clinical studies of the prognostic significance of MCs within the TME in human cancers, as well as studies in mouse models of cancer that reveal how MCs are recruited to the TME and how MCs facilitate tumor growth. Also, we will summarize our recent studies indicating that MCs impair generation of protective antitumor T cell responses and accumulation of intratumoral T(eff) cells. We will also highlight some approaches to target MCs in the TME in order to unleash antitumor cytotoxicity.