RNA沉默在植物生物逆境反应中的作用

RNA沉默是真核生物共有的基因表达调节机制和防御机制。在植物RNA沉默中, 一些小RNAs, 如微小 RNAs和小干扰RNAs, 在植物防御病毒、细菌或食草动物的反应中具有重要作用。为了抑制宿主的RNA沉默系统, 植物病毒或细菌进化出了在RNA沉默不同阶段起作用的病毒沉默抑制子或细菌沉默抑制子, 来克服寄主的RNA沉默反应。文章就植物RNA沉默、病毒沉默抑制子、细菌沉默抑制子及其相关防御反应的一些新进展做一概述。     

植物抗病毒分子机制

在与植物病毒的长期斗争中,植物进化出多种抗病毒机制,其中RNA沉默和R基因介导的病毒抗性是最受人们关注的两种机制.一方面,RNA沉默是植物抵抗病毒侵染的重要手段.植物在病毒侵染过程中可形成病毒来源的双链RNA,经过DCL蛋白的切割、加工形成sRNA,与AGO蛋白结合形成RISC指导病毒RNA的沉默,用于清除病毒.相应地,病毒在与植物的竞争中进化出RNA沉默抑制子,抑制宿主RNA沉默系统以逃避宿主RNA沉默抗病毒反应,增强致病能力.另一方面,植物也进化出R基因介导植物对包括病毒在内的多类病原的抗性.R蛋白直接或间接识别病毒因子,通过一系列的信号转导途径激活植物防御反应,限制病毒的进一步侵染.对植物抗病毒的研究有助于人们对植物抗病分子基础的理解,有重要的科学意义和潜在应用价值.本文综述了植物抗病毒分子机制的重要进展.     

Viral infection induces expression of novel phased microRNAs from conserved cellular microRNA precursors

RNA silencing, mediated by small RNAs including microRNAs (miRNAs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), is a potent antiviral or antibacterial mechanism, besides regulating normal cellular gene expression critical for development and physiology. To gain insights into host small RNA metabolism under infections by different viruses, we used Solexa/Illumina deep sequencing to characterize the small RNA profiles of rice plants infected by two distinct viruses, Rice dwarf virus (RDV, dsRNA virus) and Rice stripe virus (RSV, a negative sense and ambisense RNA virus), respectively, as compared with those from non-infected plants. Our analyses showed that RSV infection enhanced the accumulation of some rice miRNA*s, but not their corresponding miRNAs, as well as accumulation of phased siRNAs from a particular precursor. Furthermore, RSV infection also induced the expression of novel miRNAs in a phased pattern from several conserved miRNA precursors. In comparison, no such changes in host small RNA expression was observed in RDV-infected rice plants. Significantly RSV infection elevated the expression levels of selective OsDCLs and OsAGOs, whereas RDV infection only affected the expression of certain OsRDRs. Our results provide a comparative analysis, via deep sequencing, of changes in the small RNA profiles and in the genes of RNA silencing machinery induced by different viruses in a natural and economically important crop host plant. They uncover new mechanisms and complexity of virus-host interactions that may have important implications for further studies on the evolution of cellular small RNA biogenesis that impact pathogen infection, pathogenesis, as well as organismal development.     

Plant Mobile Small RNAs

In plants, RNA silencing is a fundamental regulator of gene expression, heterochromatin formation, suppression of transposable elements, and defense against viruses. The sequence specificity of these processes relies on small noncoding RNA (sRNA) molecules. Although the spreading of RNA silencing across the plant has been recognized for nearly two decades, only recently have sRNAs been formally demonstrated as the mobile silencing signals. Here, we discuss the various types of mobile sRNA molecules, their short- and long-range movement, and their function in recipient cells.RNA silencing is a regulatory mechanism that controls the expression of endogenous genes and exogenous molecular parasites such as viruses, transgenes, and transposable elements. One of the most fascinating aspects of RNA silencing found in plants and invertebrates is its mobile nature—in other words, its ability to spread from the cell where it has been initiated to neighboring cells. This phenomenon relies on the movement of small noncoding RNA molecules (sRNA, 21–24 nucleotides [nt] in length) that provide the sequence specificity of the silencing effects. In plants, there are two major classes of sRNAs: short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and micro RNAs (miRNAs). These sRNAs are generated by diverse and sometimes interacting biochemical pathways, which may influence their mobility. Movement of plant sRNAs falls into two main categories: cell-to-cell (short-range) and systemic (long-range) movement (Melnyk et al. 2011).     

Diverse RNA viruses elicit the expression of common sets of genes in susceptible Arabidopsis thaliana plants

Systemic infections of plants by viruses require that viruses modify host cells in order to facilitate infections. These modifications include induction of host factors required for replication, propagation and movement, and suppression of host defense responses, which are likely to be associated with changes in host gene expression. Past studies of the effects of viral infection on gene expression in susceptible hosts have been limited to only a handful of genes. To gain broader insight into the responses elicited by viruses in susceptible hosts, high-density oligonucleotide probe microarray technology was used. Arabidopsis leaves were either mock inoculated or inoculated with cucumber mosaic cucumovirus, oil seed rape tobamovirus, turnip vein clearing tobamovirus, potato virus X potexvirus, or turnip mosaic potyvirus. Inoculated leaves were collected at 1, 2, 4, and 5 days after inoculation, total RNA was isolated, and samples were hybridized to Arabidopsis GeneChip microarrays (Affymetrix). Microarray hybridization revealed co-ordinated changes in gene expression in response to infection by diverse viruses. These changes include virus-general and virus-specific alterations in the expression of genes associated with distinct defense or stress responses. Analyses of the promoters of these genes further suggest that diverse RNA viruses elicit common responses in susceptible plant hosts through signaling pathways that have not been previously characterized.     

Small RNAs in viral infection and host defense

Small RNAs are the key mediators of RNA silencing and related pathways in plants and other eukaryotic organisms. Silencing pathways couple the destruction of double-stranded RNA with the use of the resulting small RNAs to target other nucleic acid molecules that contain the complementary sequence. This discovery has revolutionized our ideas about host defense and genetic regulatory mechanisms in eukaryotes. Small RNAs can direct the degradation of mRNAs and single-stranded viral RNAs, the modification of DNA and histones, and the inhibition of translation. Viruses might even use small RNAs to do some targeting of their own to manipulate host gene expression. This review highlights the current understanding and new insights concerning the roles of small RNAs in virus infection and host defense in plants.     

病毒RNA如何逃避宿主细胞的降解

细胞RNA的降解机制不仅在基因表达调节方面具有重要作用,而且也是一种重要的病毒防御机制. 作为一种必须在细胞内增殖的微生物,病毒已经进化出了多种机制,以保护它们的RNA免被宿主细胞降解,如病毒RNA模拟宿主细胞mRNA的结构、形成磷脂包膜、形成局部二级结构、结合自己或宿主细胞编码的蛋白质和编码核酸酶增强宿主细胞mRNA降解等. 本文主要论述了病毒RNA逃避宿主细胞降解的方式,并对其应用前景进行了展望,尤其是在研发抗病毒药物方面的应用前景.     

vsiRNA18 derived from tobacco curly shoot virus can regulate virus infection in Nicotiana benthamiana

Virus-derived small interfering RNAs (vsiRNAs) play important roles in regulating host endogenous gene expression to promote virus infection and induce RNA silencing to suppress virus infection. However, to date, how vsiRNAs affect geminivirus infection in host plants has been less studied. In this study, we found that tobacco curly shoot virus (TbCSV)-derived vsiRNA18 (TvsiRNA18) can regulate TbCSV infection in Nicotiana benthamiana plants. The virus-mediated small RNA expression system and stable transformation technique were used to clarify the molecular role of TvsiRNA18 in TbCSV infection. The results indicate that TvsiRNA18 can aggravate disease symptoms in these plants and enhance viral DNA accumulation. ATP-dependent RNA helicase (ATP-dRH) was proven to be a target of TvsiRNA18, and down-regulation of ATP-dRH in plants was shown to induce virus-like leaf curling symptoms and increase TbCSV infection. These results suggest that TvsiRNA18 is an important regulator of TbCSV infection by suppressing ATP-dRH expression. This is the first report to demonstrate that TbCSV-derived vsiRNA can target host endogenous genes to affect symptom development, which helps to reveal the molecular mechanism of symptom occurrence after the virus infects the host.     

Characterization of the small RNA transcriptome in plant–microbe (Brassica/Erwinia) interactions by high-throughput sequencing

Non-coding, small RNAs (sRNAs) have been identified in a wide spectrum of organisms ranging from bacteria to humans; however, the role and mechanisms of these sRNA in plant immunity is largely unknown. To determine possible roles of sRNA in plant–pathogen interaction, we carried out a high-throughput sRNA sequencing of Brassica campestris using non-infected plants and plants infected with Erwinia carotovora. Consistent with our hypothesis that distinct classes of host sRNAs alerts their expression levels in response to infection, we found that: (1) host 28-nt sRNAs were strongly increased under pathogen infection; and (2) a group of host sRNAs homologous to the pathogen genome also accumulated at significantly higher level. Our data thus suggest several distinct classes of the host sRNAs may enhance their function by up-regulation of their expression/stability in response to bacterial pathogen challenges.     

Mammalian RNA virus-derived small RNA: biogenesis and functional activity

The role of virus-derived small RNAs (vsRNAs) has been identified as an antiviral mechanism in plants, arthropods, and nematodes. Although mammalian DNA viruses have been observed to encode functional miRNAs, whether RNA virus infection generates functional vsRNAs remains under discussion. This article reviews the most recent reports regarding pathways for generating vsRNAs and the identified vsRNA activity in mammalian cells infected with RNA viruses. We also discuss several hypotheses regarding the roles of mammalian vsRNAs and comment on the potential directions for this research field.     

Viral induction and suppression of RNA silencing in plants

RNA silencing in plants and insects can function as a defence mechanism against invading viruses. RNA silencing-based antiviral defence entails the production of virus-derived small interfering RNAs which guide specific antiviral effector complexes to inactivate viral genomes. As a response to this defence system, viruses have evolved viral suppressors of RNA silencing (VSRs) to overcome the host defence. VSRs can act on various steps of the different silencing pathways. Viral infection can have a profound impact on the host endogenous RNA silencing regulatory pathways; alterations of endogenous short RNA expression profile and gene expression are often associated with viral infections and their symptoms. Here we discuss our current understanding of the main steps of RNA-silencing responses to viral invasion in plants and the effects of VSRs on endogenous pathways. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: MicroRNAs in viral gene regulation.     

Salicylic acid-dependent expression of host genes in compatible Arabidopsis-virus interactions

Plant viruses elicit the expression of common sets of genes in susceptible hosts. Studies in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) indicate that at least one-third of the genes induced in common by viruses have been previously associated with plant defense and stress responses. The genetic and molecular requirements for the induction of these stress and defense-related genes during compatible host-virus interactions were investigated with a panel of Arabidopsis mutant and transgenic plants defective in one or more defense signaling pathways. pad4, eds5, NahG, npr1, jar1, ein2, sid2, eds1, and wild-type Columbia-0 and Wassilewskija-2 plants were infected with two different viruses, cucumber mosaic virus and oilseed rape mosaic virus. Gene expression was assayed by a high-throughput fiber-optic bead array consisting of 388 genes and by RNA gel blots. These analyses demonstrated that, in compatible host-virus interactions, the expression of the majority of defense-related genes is induced by a salicylic acid-dependent, NPR1-independent signaling pathway with a few notable exceptions that did require NPR1. Interestingly, none of the mutant or transgenic plants showed enhanced susceptibility to either cucumber mosaic virus or oilseed rape mosaic virus based on both symptoms and virus accumulation. This observation is in contrast to the enhanced disease susceptibility phenotypes that these mutations or transgenes confer to some bacterial and fungal pathogens. These experimental results suggest that expression of many defense-related genes in compatible host plants might share components of signaling pathways involved in incompatible host-pathogen interactions, but their increased expression has no negative effect on viral infection.     

Small RNAs: Efficient and miraculous effectors that play key roles in plant–microbe interactions

Plants' response to pathogens is highly complex and involves changes at different levels, such as activation or repression of a vast array of genes. Recently, many studies have demonstrated that many RNAs, especially small RNAs (sRNAs), are involved in genetic expression and reprogramming affecting plant–pathogen interactions. The sRNAs, including short interfering RNAs and microRNAs, are noncoding RNA with 18–30 nucleotides, and are recognized as key genetic and epigenetic regulators. In this review, we summarize the new findings about defence-related sRNAs in the response to pathogens and our current understanding of their effects on plant–pathogen interactions. The main content of this review article includes the roles of sRNAs in plant–pathogen interactions, cross-kingdom sRNA trafficking between host and pathogen, and the application of RNA-based fungicides for plant disease control.     

Escape of a plant virus from amplicon-mediated RNA silencing is associated with biotic or abiotic stress

Strong RNA silencing was induced in plants transformed with an amplicon consisting of full-length cDNA of potato leafroll virus (PLRV) expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP), as shown by low levels of PLRV-GFP accumulation, lack of symptoms and accumulation of amplicon-specific short interfering RNAs (siRNAs). Inoculation of these plants with various viruses known to encode silencing suppressor proteins induced a striking synergistic effect leading to the enhanced accumulation of PLRV-GFP, suggesting that it had escaped from silencing. However, PLRV-GFP escape also occurred following inoculation with viruses that do not encode known silencing suppressors and treatment of silenced plants with biotic or abiotic stress agents. We propose that viruses can evade host RNA-silencing defences by a previously unrecognized mechanism that may be associated with a host response to some types of abiotic stress such as heat shock.