A story with a good ending: tRNA 3'-end maturation by CCA-adding enzymes

CCA-adding enzymes (tRNA nucleotidyltransferases) are responsible for the maturation or repair of the functional 3' end of tRNAs. These enzymes are remarkable because they polymerize the essential nucleotides CCA onto the 3' terminus of tRNA precursors without using a nucleic acid template. Recent crystal structures, plus three decades of enzymology, have revealed the elegant mechanisms by which CCA-adding enzymes achieve their substrate specificity in a nucleic acid template independent fashion. The class I CCA-adding enzyme employs both an arginine sidechain and backbone phosphates of the bound tRNA to recognize incoming nucleotides. It switches from C to A addition through changes in the size and shape of the nucleotide-binding pocket, which is progressively altered by the elongating 3' terminus of the tRNA. By contrast, the class II CCA-adding enzyme uses only amino acid sidechains, which form a protein template for incoming nucleotide selection.     

Divergent evolutions of trinucleotide polymerization revealed by an archaeal CCA-adding enzyme structure

CCA-adding enzyme [ATP(CTP):tRNA nucleotidyltransferase], a template-independent RNA polymerase, adds the defined 'cytidine-cytidine-adenosine' sequence onto the 3' end of tRNA. The archaeal CCA-adding enzyme (class I) and eubacterial/eukaryotic CCA-adding enzyme (class II) show little amino acid sequence homology, but catalyze the same reaction in a defined fashion. Here, we present the crystal structures of the class I archaeal CCA-adding enzyme from Archaeoglobus fulgidus, and its complexes with CTP and ATP at 2.0, 2.0 and 2.7 A resolutions, respectively. The geometry of the catalytic carboxylates and the relative positions of CTP and ATP to a single catalytic site are well conserved in both classes of CCA-adding enzymes, whereas the overall architectures, except for the catalytic core, of the class I and class II CCA-adding enzymes are fundamentally different. Furthermore, the recognition mechanisms of substrate nucleotides and tRNA molecules are distinct between these two classes, suggesting that the catalytic domains of class I and class II enzymes share a common origin, and distinct substrate recognition domains have been appended to form the two presently divergent classes.     

Sulfolobus shibatae CCA-adding enzyme forms a tetramer upon binding two tRNA molecules: A scrunching-shuttling model of CCA specificity

The tRNA CCA-adding enzyme adds CCA stepwise to immature transfer RNA molecules untemplated, but with high specificity. We examined the oligomerization state of the enzyme from Sulfolobus shibatae and its binding to transfer RNA molecules, using various biophysical and biochemical methods including size exclusion chromatography, multi-angle laser light scattering, small-angle X-ray scattering, and gel electrophoresis band mobility shift assay. The 48 kDa monomer forms a stable salt- resistant dimer in solution. Further dimerization of the dimeric enzyme to form a tetramer is induced by the binding of two tRNA molecules. The formation of a tetramer with only two bound tRNA molecules leads us to suggest that one pair of active sites may be specific for adding two C bases, which results in scrunching of the primer strand. An adjacent second pair of active sites may be specific for adding A after addition of two C bases which makes the 3' terminus long enough to reach the second pair of active sites.     

Archaeal CCA-adding enzymes: central role of a highly conserved beta-turn motif in RNA polymerization without translocation

The CCA-adding enzyme (tRNA nucleotidyltransferase) builds and repairs the 3' end of tRNA. A single active site adds both CTP and ATP, but the enzyme has no nucleic acid template, and tRNA does not translocate or rotate during C75 and A76 addition. We modeled the structure of the class I archaeal Sulfolobus shibatae CCA-adding enzyme on eukaryotic poly(A) polymerase and mutated residues in the vicinity of the active site. We found mutations that specifically affected C74, C75, or A76 addition, as well as mutations that progressively impaired addition of CCA. Many of these mutations clustered in an evolutionarily versatile beta-turn located between strands 3 and 4 of the nucleotidyltransferase domain. Our mutational analysis confirms and extends recent crystallographic studies of the highly homologous Archaeoglobus fulgidus enzyme. We suggest that the unusual phenotypes of the beta-turn mutants reflect the consecutive conformations assumed by the beta-turn as it presents the discriminator base N73, then C74, and finally C75 to the active site without translocation or rotation of the tRNA acceptor stem. We also suggest that beta-turn mutants can affect nucleotide selection because the growing 3' end of tRNA must be properly positioned to serve as part of the ribonucleoprotein template that selects the incoming nucleotide.     

A top-half tDNA minihelix is a good substrate for the eubacterial CCA-adding enzyme.

The CCA-adding enzyme [ATP(CTP):tRNA nucleotidyltransferase] catalyzes the addition and regeneration of the 3'-terminal CCA sequence of tRNAs. We show that the CCA-adding enzyme will specifically add a CCA terminus to synthetic full-length tDNA and to DNA oligonucleotides corresponding to the "top half" of tRNA-the acceptor stem and TpsiC stem-loop of tRNA. CCA addition to the top half tDNA minihelices requires a 2' as well as a 3' OH at the 3' terminus of the tDNA. Addition also depends on the length of the base paired stem, and is facilitated by, but is not dependent upon, the presence of a TpsiC loop. These results provide further evidence for independent functions of the top and bottom halves of tRNA, and support the hypothesis that these two structurally distinct and functionally independent domains evolved independently.     

A single catalytically active subunit in the multimeric Sulfolobus shibatae CCA-adding enzyme can carry out all three steps of CCA addition

The CCA-adding enzyme ATP(CTP):tRNA nucleotidyltransferase builds and repairs the 3'-terminal CCA sequence of tRNA. Although this unusual RNA polymerase has no nucleic acid template, it can construct the CCA sequence one nucleotide at a time using CTP and ATP as substrates. We found previously that tRNA does not translocate along the enzyme during CCA addition (Yue, D., Weiner, A. M., and Maizels, N. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 29693-29700) and that a single nucleotidyltransferase motif adds all three nucleotides (Shi, P.-Y., Maizels, N., and Weiner, A. M. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 3197-3206). Intriguingly, the CCA-adding enzyme from the archaeon Sulfolobus shibatae is a homodimer that forms a tetramer upon binding two tRNAs. We therefore asked whether the active form of the S. shibatae enzyme might have two quasi-equivalent active sites, one adding CTP and the other ATP. Using an intersubunit complementation approach, we demonstrate that the dimer is active and that a single catalytically active subunit can carry out all three steps of CCA addition. We also locate one UV light-induced tRNA cross-link on the enzyme structure and provide evidence suggesting the location of another. Our data rule out shuttling models in which the 3'-end of the tRNA shuttles from one quasi-equivalent active site to another, demonstrate that tRNA-induced tetramerization is not required for CCA addition, and support a role for the tail domain of the enzyme in tRNA binding.     

Identification and characterization of mammalian mitochondrial tRNA nucleotidyltransferases

The CCA-adding enzyme (ATP:tRNA adenylyltransferase or CTP:tRNA cytidylyltransferase (EC )) generates the conserved CCA sequence responsible for the attachment of amino acid at the 3' terminus of tRNA molecules. It was shown that enzymes from various organisms strictly recognize the elbow region of tRNA formed by the conserved D- and T-loops. However, most of the mammalian mitochondrial (mt) tRNAs lack consensus sequences in both D- and T-loops. To characterize the mammalian mt CCA-adding enzymes, we have partially purified the enzyme from bovine liver mitochondria and determined cDNA sequences from human and mouse dbESTs by mass spectrometric analysis. The identified sequences contained typical amino-terminal peptides for mitochondrial protein import and had characteristics of the class II nucleotidyltransferase superfamily that includes eukaryotic and eubacterial CCA-adding enzymes. The human recombinant enzyme was overexpressed in Escherichia coli, and its CCA-adding activity was characterized using several mt tRNAs as substrates. The results clearly show that the human mt CCA-adding enzyme can efficiently repair mt tRNAs that are poor substrates for the E. coli enzyme although both enzymes work equally well on cytoplasmic tRNAs. This suggests that the mammalian mt enzymes have evolved so as to recognize mt tRNAs with unusual structures.     

Unusual synthesis by the Escherichia coli CCA-adding enzyme

The tRNA 3' end contains the conserved CCA sequence at the 74-76 positions. The CCA sequence is synthesized and maintained by the CCA-adding enzymes. The specificity of the Escherichia coli enzyme at each of the 74-76 positions was investigated using synthetic minihelix substrates that contain permuted 3' ends. Results here indicate that the enzyme has the ability to synthesize unusual 3' ends. When incubated with CTP alone, the enzyme catalyzed the addition of C74, C75, C76, and multiple Cs. Although the addition of C74 and C75 was as expected, that of C76 and multiple Cs was not. In particular, the addition of C76 generated CCC, which would have conflicted with the biological role of the enzyme. However, the presence of ATP prevented the synthesis of CCC and completely switched the specificity to CCA. The presence of ATP also had an inhibitory effect on the synthesis of multiple Cs. Thus, the E. coli CCA enzyme can be a poly(C) polymerase but its synthesis of poly(C) is regulated by the presence of ATP. These features led to a model of CCA synthesis that is independent of a nucleic acid template. The synthesis of poly(C) by the CCA-adding enzyme is reminiscent of that of poly(A) by poly(A) polymerase and it provides a functional rationale for the close sequence relationship between these two enzymes in the family of nucleotidyltransferases.     

Crystal structures of an archaeal class I CCA-adding enzyme and its nucleotide complexes

CCA-adding enzymes catalyze the addition of CCA onto the 3' terminus of immature tRNAs without using a nucleic acid template and have been divided into two classes based on their amino acid sequences. We have determined the crystal structures of a class I CCA-adding enzyme from Archeoglobus fulgidus (AfCCA) and its complexes with ATP, CTP, or UTP. Although it and the class II bacterial Bacillus stearothermophilus CCA enzyme (BstCCA) have similar dimensions and domain architectures (head, neck, body, and tail), only the polymerase domain is structurally homologous. Moreover, the relative orientation of the head domain with respect to the body and tail domains, which appear likely to bind tRNA, differs significantly between the two enzyme classes. Unlike the class II BstCCA, this enzyme binds nucleotides nonspecifically in the absence of bound tRNA. The shape and electrostatic charge distribution of the AfCCA enzyme suggests a model for tRNA binding that accounts for the phosphates that are protected from chemical modification by tRNA binding to AfCCA. The structures of the AfCCA enzyme and the eukaryotic poly(A) polymerase are very similar, implying a close evolutionary relationship between them.     

Poly(C) synthesis by class I and class II CCA-adding enzymes

The CCA-adding enzymes [ATP(CTP):tRNA nucleotidyl transferases], which catalyze synthesis of the conserved CCA sequence to the tRNA 3' end, are divided into two classes. Recent studies show that the class II Escherichia coli CCA-adding enzyme synthesizes poly(C) when incubated with CTP alone, but switches to synthesize CCA when incubated with both CTP and ATP. Because the poly(C) activity can shed important light on the mechanism of the untemplated synthesis of CCA, it is important to determine if this activity is also present in the class I CCA enzymes, which differ from the class II enzymes by significant sequence divergence. We show here that two members of the class I family, the archaeal Sulfolobus shibatae and Methanococcus jannaschii CCA-adding enzymes, are also capable of poly(C) synthesis. These two class I enzymes catalyze poly(C) synthesis and display a response of kinetic parameters to the presence of ATP similar to that of the class II E. coli enzyme. Thus, despite extensive sequence diversification, members of both classes employ common strategies of nucleotide addition, suggesting conservation of a mechanism in the development of specificity for CCA. For the E. coli enzyme, discrimination of poly(C) from CCA synthesis in the intact tRNA and in the acceptor-TPsiC domain is achieved by the same kinetic strategy, and a mutation that preferentially affects addition of A76 but not poly(C) has been identified. Additionally, we show that enzymes of both classes exhibit a processing activity that removes nucleotides in the 3' to 5' direction to as far as position 74.     

U2 small nuclear RNA is a substrate for the CCA-adding enzyme (tRNA nucleotidyltransferase).

The CCA-adding enzyme builds and repairs the 3' terminus of tRNA. Approximately 65% of mature human U2 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) ends in 3'-terminal CCA, as do all mature tRNAs; the other 35% ends in 3' CC or possibly 3' C. The 3'-terminal A of U2 snRNA cannot be encoded because the 3' end of the U2 snRNA coding region is CC/CC, where the slash indicates the last encoded nucleotide. The first detectable U2 snRNA precursor contains 10-16 extra 3' nucleotides that are removed by one or more 3' exonucleases. Thus, if 3' exonuclease activity removes the encoded 3' CC during U2 snRNA maturation, as appears to be the case in vitro, the cell may need to build or rebuild the 3'-terminal A, CA, or CCA of U2 snRNA. We asked whether homologous and heterologous class I and class II CCA-adding enzymes could add 3'-terminal A, CA, or CCA to human U2 snRNA lacking 3'-terminal A, CA, or CCA. The naked U2 snRNAs were good substrates for the human CCA-adding enzyme but were inactive with the Escherichia coli enzyme; activity was also observed on native U2 snRNPs. We suggest that the 3' stem/loop of U2 snRNA resembles a tRNA minihelix, the smallest efficient substrate for class I and II CCA-adding enzymes, and that CCA addition to U2 snRNA may take place in vivo after snRNP assembly has begun.     

tRNA maturation: RNA polymerization without a nucleic acid template

The CCA-adding enzyme, which builds and repairs the 3' terminal CCA sequence of tRNA, is the only RNA polymerase that can synthesize a defined nucleotide sequence without using a nucleic acid template. New cocrystal structures tell us how this remarkable enzyme works.     

Site selection by Xenopus laevis RNAase P

Investigation of the mechanism of cleavage site selection by Xenopus RNAase P reveals that the acceptor stem, a 7 bp helix common to all tRNA precursors, is required for cleavage. We propose that Xenopus RNAase P recognizes conserved features of the mature tRNA and that the cleavage site is selected by measuring the length of the acceptor stem. In support of this, we demonstrate that insertion of 2 bp in the acceptor stem of yeast pre-tRNA(3Leu) relocates the cleavage site 2 bases 3' to the original one. In addition, insertion of 1 bp in the acceptor stem of the end-matured yeast pre-tRNA(Phe) generates an RNAase P cleavage site: the enzyme produces a mature tRNA with the characteristic 7 bp stem and releases one 5' flanking nucleotide. Since it has previously been shown that cleavage sites of the splicing endonuclease are determined by the length of the anticodon stem, RNAase P and the splicing endonuclease apparently use different stems to determine their cutting sites.     

A tRNA's fate is decided at its 3′ end: Collaborative actions of CCA-adding enzyme and RNases involved in tRNA processing and degradation

tRNAs are key players in translation and are additionally involved in a wide range of distinct cellular processes. The vital importance of tRNAs becomes evident in numerous diseases that are linked to defective tRNA molecules. It is therefore not surprising that the structural intactness of tRNAs is continuously scrutinized and defective tRNAs are eliminated. In this process, erroneous tRNAs are tagged with single-stranded RNA sequences that are recognized by degrading exonucleases. Recent discoveries have revealed that the CCA-adding enzyme – actually responsible for the de novo synthesis of the 3′-CCA end – plays an indispensable role in tRNA quality control by incorporating a second CCA triplet that is recognized as a degradation tag. In this review, we give an update on the latest findings regarding tRNA quality control that turns out to represent an interplay of the CCA-adding enzyme and RNases involved in tRNA degradation and maturation. In particular, the RNase-induced turnover of the CCA end is now recognized as a trigger for the CCA-adding enzyme to repeatedly scrutinize the structural intactness of a tRNA. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: SI: Regulation of tRNA synthesis and modification in physiological conditions and disease edited by Dr. Boguta Magdalena.