An interaction between integrin and the talin FERM domain mediates integrin activation but not linkage to the cytoskeleton

Transmembrane adhesion receptors, such as integrins, mediate cell adhesion by interacting with intracellular proteins that connect to the cytoskeleton. Talin, one such linker protein, is thought to have two roles: mediating inside-out activation of integrins, and connecting extracellular matrix (ECM)-bound integrins to the cytoskeleton. Talin's amino-terminal head, which consists of a FERM domain, binds an NPxY motif within the cytoplasmic tail of most integrin beta subunits. This is consistent with the role of FERM domains in recruiting other proteins to the plasma membrane. We tested the role of the talin-head-NPxY interaction in integrin function in Drosophila. We found that introduction of a mutation that perturbs this binding in vitro into the isolated talin head disrupts its recruitment by integrins in vivo. Surprisingly, when engineered into the full-length talin, this mutation did not disrupt talin recruitment by integrins nor its ability to connect integrins to the cytoskeleton. However, it reduced the ability of talin to strengthen integrin adhesion to the ECM, indicating that the function of the talin-head-NPxY interaction is solely to regulate integrin adhesion.     

The phosphotyrosine binding-like domain of talin activates integrins

Cellular regulation of the ligand binding affinity of integrin adhesion receptors (integrin activation) depends on the integrin beta cytoplasmic domains (tails). The head domain of talin binds to several integrin beta tails and activates integrins. This head domain contains a predicted FERM domain composed of three subdomains (F1, F2, and F3). An integrin-activating talin fragment was predicted to contain the F2 and F3 subdomains. Both isolated subdomains bound specifically to the integrin beta3 tail. However, talin F3 bound the beta3 tail with a 4-fold higher affinity than talin F2. Furthermore, expression of talin F3 (but not F2) in cells led to activation of integrin alpha(IIb)beta3. A molecular model of talin F3 indicated that it resembles a phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domain. PTB domains recognize peptide ligands containing beta turns, often formed by NPXY motifs. NPX(Y/F) motifs are highly conserved in integrin beta tails, and mutations that disrupt this motif interfere with both integrin activation and talin binding. Thus, integrin binding to talin resembles the interactions of PTB domains with peptide ligands. These resemblances suggest that the activation of integrins requires the presence of a beta turn at NPX(Y/F) motifs conserved in integrin beta cytoplasmic domains.     

Calpain cleavage promotes talin binding to the beta 3 integrin cytoplasmic domain

Talin links integrin beta cytoplasmic domains to the actin cytoskeleton and is involved in the clustering and activation of these receptors. To understand how talin recognizes integrin beta cytoplasmic domains, we configured surface plasmon resonance methodology to measure the interaction of talin with the beta3 integrin cytoplasmic domain. Here we report that the N-terminal approximately 47-kDa talin head domain (talin-H) has a 6-fold higher binding affinity than intact talin for the beta3 tail. The affinity difference is mainly due to a difference in k(on). Calpain cleavage of intact talin released talin-H and resulted in a 16-fold increase in apparent K(a) and a 100-fold increase in apparent k(on). The increase in talin binding after cleavage was greater than predicted for stoichiometric liberation of free talin-H. This additional increase in binding was due to cooperative binding of talin-H and talin rod domain to the beta3 tail. Talin resembles ERM (ezrin, radixin, moesin) proteins in possessing an N-terminal FERM (band four-point-one, ezrin, radixin, moesin) domain. These data show that the talin FERM domain, like that in the ERM proteins, is masked in the intact molecule. Furthermore, they suggest that talin cleavage by calpain may contribute to the effects of the protease on the clustering and activation of integrins.     

Structural basis for the autoinhibition of talin in regulating integrin activation

Activation of heterodimeric (alpha/beta) integrin transmembrane receptors by the 270 kDa cytoskeletal protein talin is essential for many important cell adhesive and physiological responses. A key step in this process involves interaction of phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domain in the N-terminal head of talin (talin-H) with integrin beta membrane-proximal cytoplasmic tails (beta-MP-CTs). Compared to talin-H, intact talin exhibits low potency in inducing integrin activation. Using NMR spectroscopy, we show that the large C-terminal rod domain of talin (talin-R) interacts with talin-H and allosterically restrains talin in a closed conformation. We further demonstrate that talin-R specifically masks a region in talin-PTB where integrin beta-MP-CT binds and competes with it for binding to talin-PTB. The inhibitory interaction is disrupted by a constitutively activating mutation (M319A) or by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, a known talin activator. These data define a distinct autoinhibition mechanism for talin and suggest how it controls integrin activation and cell adhesion.     

The talin rod IBS2 alpha-helix interacts with the beta3 integrin cytoplasmic tail membrane-proximal helix by establishing charge complementary salt bridges

Talin establishes a major link between integrins and actin filaments and contains two distinct integrin binding sites: one, IBS1, located in the talin head domain and involved in integrin activation and a second, IBS2, that maps to helix 50 of the talin rod domain and is essential for linking integrin beta subunits to the cytoskeleton ( Moes, M., Rodius, S., Coleman, S. J., Monkley, S. J., Goormaghtigh, E., Tremuth, L., Kox, C., van der Holst, P. P., Critchley, D. R., and Kieffer, N. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 17280-17288 ). Through the combined approach of mutational analysis of the beta3 integrin cytoplasmic tail and the talin rod IBS2 site, SPR binding studies, as well as site-specific antibody inhibition experiments, we provide evidence that the integrin beta3-talin rod interaction relies on a helix-helix association between alpha-helix 50 of the talin rod domain and the membrane-proximal alpha-helix of the beta3 integrin cytoplasmic tail. Moreover, charge complementarity between the highly conserved talin rod IBS2 lysine residues and integrin beta3 glutamic acid residues is necessary for this interaction. Our results support a model in which talin IBS2 binds to the same face of the beta3 subunit cytoplasmic helix as the integrin alphaIIb cytoplasmic tail helix, suggesting that IBS2 can only interact with the beta3 subunit following integrin activation.     

Regulation of integrin alphaIIbbeta3 activation by distinct regions of its cytoplasmic tails

The short cytoplasmic tails regulate activation of integrin adhesion receptors via clasping/unclasping of their membrane-proximal helices. Using integrin alpha(IIb)beta(3) as a model, we show that a previously reported activating mutation alpha(IIb)(R(995)D) that perturbs the electrostatic interface in the clasp only partially activates alpha(IIb)beta(3) and that extensive activation of the receptor is achieved by complete deletion of alpha(IIb) CT or triple mutations in alpha(IIb)(V(990)A/F(992)A/R(995)D) that disrupt both electrostatic and hydrophobic interfaces in the clasp. The results provide quantitative evidence for an equilibrium-based integrin activation process where shifting the equilibrium to the fully activated state requires total unclasping of the cytoplasmic tails. We further demonstrate that while the C-terminal region of the alpha(IIb) tail minimally influences alpha(IIb)beta(3) activation, the C-terminal region of the beta(3) tail is critically involved. A disease-causing mutation of S(752)P in this region, but not S(752)A, suppressed partial activation induced by R(995)D or the talin head domain but did not affect activation induced by alpha(IIb) truncation. NMR spectroscopy revealed that S(752)P but not the S(752)A mutation disrupted a C-terminal helix within the beta(3) tail, suggesting that the C-terminal helix may regulate the equilibrium-based clasping/unclasping process. Together, these data provide molecular insights into how distinct regions of the cytoplasmic tails differentially and cooperatively regulate integrin activation.     

The mechanisms and dynamics of (alpha)v(beta)3 integrin clustering in living cells

During cell migration, the physical link between the extracellular substrate and the actin cytoskeleton mediated by receptors of the integrin family is constantly modified. We analyzed the mechanisms that regulate the clustering and incorporation of activated alphavbeta3 integrins into focal adhesions. Manganese (Mn2+) or mutational activation of integrins induced the formation of de novo F-actin-independent integrin clusters. These clusters recruited talin, but not other focal adhesion adapters, and overexpression of the integrin-binding head domain of talin increased clustering. Integrin clustering required immobilized ligand and was prevented by the sequestration of phosphoinositole-4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2). Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analysis of Mn(2+)-induced integrin clusters revealed increased integrin turnover compared with mature focal contacts, whereas stabilization of the open conformation of the integrin ectodomain by mutagenesis reduced integrin turnover in focal contacts. Thus, integrin clustering requires the formation of the ternary complex consisting of activated integrins, immobilized ligands, talin, and PI(4,5)P2. The dynamic remodeling of this ternary complex controls cell motility.     

Structural basis of integrin activation by talin

Regulation of integrin affinity (activation) is essential for metazoan development and for many pathological processes. Binding of the talin phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domain to integrin beta subunit cytoplasmic domains (tails) causes activation, whereas numerous other PTB-domain-containing proteins bind integrins without activating them. Here we define the structure of a complex between talin and the membrane-proximal integrin beta3 cytoplasmic domain and identify specific contacts between talin and the integrin tail required for activation. We used structure-based mutagenesis to engineer talin and beta3 variants that interact with comparable affinity to the wild-type proteins but inhibit integrin activation by competing with endogenous talin. These results reveal the structural basis of talin's unique ability to activate integrins, identify an interaction that could aid in the design of therapeutics to block integrin activation, and enable engineering of cells with defects in the activation of multiple classes of integrins.     

A conserved lipid-binding loop in the kindlin FERM F1 domain is required for kindlin-mediated αIIbβ3 integrin coactivation

The activation of heterodimeric integrin adhesion receptors from low to high affinity states occurs in response to intracellular signals that act on the short cytoplasmic tails of integrin β subunits. Binding of the talin FERM (four-point-one, ezrin, radixin, moesin) domain to the integrin β tail provides one key activation signal, but recent data indicate that the kindlin family of FERM domain proteins also play a central role. Kindlins directly bind integrin β subunit cytoplasmic domains at a site distinct from the talin-binding site, and target to focal adhesions in adherent cells. However, the mechanisms by which kindlins impact integrin activation remain largely unknown. A notable feature of kindlins is their similarity to the integrin-binding and activating talin FERM domain. Drawing on this similarity, here we report the identification of an unstructured insert in the kindlin F1 FERM domain, and provide evidence that a highly conserved polylysine motif in this loop supports binding to negatively charged phospholipid head groups. We further show that the F1 loop and its membrane-binding motif are required for kindlin-1 targeting to focal adhesions, and for the cooperation between kindlin-1 and -2 and the talin head in αIIbβ3 integrin activation, but not for kindlin binding to integrin β tails. These studies highlight the structural and functional similarities between kindlins and the talin head and indicate that as for talin, FERM domain interactions with acidic membrane phospholipids as well β-integrin tails contribute to the ability of kindlins to activate integrins.     

The molecular basis of filamin binding to integrins and competition with talin

The ability of adhesion receptors to transmit biochemical signals and mechanical force across cell membranes depends on interactions with the actin cytoskeleton. Filamins are large, actin-crosslinking proteins that connect multiple transmembrane and signaling proteins to the cytoskeleton. Here, we describe the high-resolution structure of an interface between filamin A and an integrin adhesion receptor. When bound, the integrin beta cytoplasmic tail forms an extended beta strand that interacts with beta strands C and D of the filamin immunoglobulin-like domain (IgFLN) 21. This interface is common to many integrins, and we suggest it is a prototype for other IgFLN domain interactions. Notably, the structurally defined filamin binding site overlaps with that of the integrin-regulator talin, and these proteins compete for binding to integrin tails, allowing integrin-filamin interactions to impact talin-dependent integrin activation. Phosphothreonine-mimicking mutations inhibit filamin, but not talin, binding, indicating that kinases may modulate this competition and provide additional means to control integrin functions.     

The N-terminal domains of talin cooperate with the phosphotyrosine binding-like domain to activate beta1 and beta3 integrins

The activation of integrin adhesion receptors from low to high affinity in response to intracellular cues controls cell adhesion and signaling. Binding of the cytoskeletal protein talin to the beta3 integrin cytoplasmic tail is required for beta3 activation, and the integrin-binding PTB-like F3 domain of talin is sufficient to activate beta3 integrins. Here we report that, whereas the conserved talin-integrin interaction is also required for beta1 activation, and talin F3 binds beta1 and beta3 integrins with comparable affinity, expression of the talin F3 domain is not sufficient to activate beta1 integrins. beta1 integrin activation could, however, be detected following expression of larger talin fragments that included the N-terminal and F1 domains, and mutagenesis indicates that these domains cooperate with talin F3 to mediate beta1 activation. This effect is not due to increased affinity for the integrin beta tail and we hypothesize that the N-terminal domains function by targeting or orienting talin in such a way as to optimize the interaction with the integrin tail. Analysis of beta3 integrin activation indicates that inclusion of the N-terminal and F1 domains also enhances F3-mediated beta3 activation. Our results therefore reveal a role for the N-terminal and F1 domains of talin during integrin activation and highlight differences in talin-mediated activation of beta1 and beta3 integrins.     

Specification of the direction of adhesive signaling by the integrin beta cytoplasmic domain

Integrin adhesion receptors can signal in two directions: first, they can regulate cellular behaviors by modulating cellular signaling enzymes ("outside-in signaling"); second, cells can regulate the affinity of integrins ("inside-out signaling") by such pathways. Integrin beta cytoplasmic domains (tails) mediate both types of signaling, and Src family kinases (SFKs) and talin, which bind to beta tails, are important for integrin signaling. Here, we utilized "homology scanning" mutagenesis to identify beta tail mutants selectively defective in c-Src binding and found that amino acid exchanges affecting a combination of an Arg and Thr residue in the integrin beta3 tail control the binding specificity for SFKs but have no effect on talin binding. Using beta tail mutants at these residues, we found that SFK binding to integrin beta tails is dispensable for inside-out signaling but is obligatory for cell spreading, a marker of outside-in signaling. Conversely, we found that point mutations that disrupt talin binding abolish integrin activation, but they do not inhibit SFK binding to the beta3 tail or the initiation of outside-in signaling once the integrins are in a high affinity form. Thus, we show that inside-out and outside-in integrin signaling are mediated by distinct and separable interactions of the integrin beta tails. Furthermore, based on our results, it is possible to discern the relative contributions of the direction of integrin signaling on biological functions in cell culture and, ultimately, in vivo.     

Reconstructing and deconstructing agonist-induced activation of integrin alphaIIbbeta3

BACKGROUND: Integrin receptors, composed of transmembrane alpha and beta subunits, are essential for the development and functioning of multicellular animals. Agonist stimulation leads cells to regulate integrin affinity ("activation"), thus controlling cell adhesion and migration, controlling extracellular-matrix assembly, and contributing to angiogenesis, tumor cell metastasis, inflammation, the immune response, and hemostasis. A final step in integrin activation is the binding of talin, a cytoskeletal protein, to integrin beta cytoplasmic domains. Many different signaling molecules that regulate integrin affinity have been described, but a pathway that connects agonist stimulation to talin binding and activation has not been mapped. RESULTS: We used forward, reverse, and synthetic genetics to engineer and order an integrin activation pathway in cells expressing a prototype activatable integrin, platelet alphaIIbbeta3. Phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) activated alphaIIbbeta3 only after the increased expression of both recombinant protein kinase Calpha (PKCalpha) and talin to levels approximating those in platelets. Inhibition of Rap1 GTPase reduced alphaIIbbeta3 activation, whereas activated Rap1A(G12V) bypassed the requirement for PKC, establishing that Rap1 is downstream of PKC. Talin binding to integrins mediates Rap1-induced activation because Rap1A(G12V) failed to activate alphaIIbbeta3 in cells expressing integrin binding-defective talin (W359A). Rap1 activated integrins by forming an integrin-associated complex containing talin in combination with the Rap effector, RIAM. Furthermore, siRNA-mediated knockdown of RIAM blocked integrin activation. CONCLUSIONS: We have, for the first time, ordered a pathway from agonist stimulation to integrin activation and established the Rap1-induced formation of an "integrin activation complex," containing RIAM and talin, that binds to and activates the integrin.     

Identification of a talin-binding site in the integrin beta(3) subunit distinct from the NPLY regulatory motif of post-ligand binding functions. The talin n-terminal head domain interacts with the membrane-proximal region of the beta(3) cytoplasmic tail.

Following platelet aggregation, integrin alpha(IIb)beta(3) becomes associated with the platelet cytoskeleton. The conserved NPLY sequence represents a potential beta-turn motif in the beta(3) cytoplasmic tail and has been suggested to mediate the interaction of beta(3) integrins with talin. In the present study, we performed a double mutation (N744Q/P745A) in the integrin beta(3) subunit to test the functional significance of this beta-turn motif. Chinese hamster ovary cells were co-transfected with cDNA constructs encoding mutant beta(3) and wild type alpha(IIb). Cells expressing either wild type (A5) or mutant (D4) alpha(IIb)beta(3) adhered to fibrinogen; however, as opposed to control A5 cells, adherent D4 cells failed to spread, form focal adhesions, or initiate protein tyrosine phosphorylation. To investigate the role of the NPLY motif in talin binding, we examined the ability of the mutant alpha(IIb)beta(3) to interact with talin in a solid phase binding assay. Both wild type and mutant alpha(IIb)beta(3), purified by RGD affinity chromatography, bound to a similar extent to immobilized talin. Additionally, purified talin failed to interact with peptides containing the AKWDTANNPLYK sequence indicating that the talin binding domain in the integrin beta(3) subunit does not reside in the NPLY motif. In contrast, specific binding of talin to peptides containing the membrane-proximal HDRKEFAKFEEERARAK sequence of the beta(3) cytoplasmic tail was observed, and this interaction was blocked by a recombinant protein fragment corresponding to the 47-kDa N-terminal head domain of talin (rTalin-N). In addition, RGD affinity purified platelet alpha(IIb)beta(3) bound dose-dependently to immobilized rTalin-N, indicating that an integrin-binding site is present in the talin N-terminal head domain. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that the NPLY beta-turn motif regulates post-ligand binding functions of alpha(IIb)beta(3) in a manner independent of talin interaction. Moreover, talin was shown to bind through its N-terminal head domain to the membrane-proximal sequence of the beta(3) cytoplasmic tail.     

A fluorescence cell biology approach to map the second integrin-binding site of talin to a 130-amino acid sequence within the rod domain

The cytoskeletal protein talin, which provides a direct link between integrins and actin filaments, has been shown to contain two distinct binding sites for integrin beta subunits. Here, we report the precise delimitation and a first functional analysis of the talin rod domain integrin-binding site. Partially overlapping cDNAs covering the entire human talin gene were transiently expressed as DsRed fusion proteins in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing alpha(IIb)beta(3), linked to green fluorescent protein (GFP). Two-color fluorescence analysis of the transfected cells, spread on fibrinogen, revealed distinct subcellular staining patterns including focal adhesion, actin filament, and granular labeling for different talin fragments. The rod domain fragment G (residues 1984-2344), devoid of any known actin- or vinculin-binding sites, colocalized with beta(3)-GFP in focal adhesions. Direct in vitro interaction of fragment G with native platelet integrin alpha(IIb)beta(3) or with the recombinant wild type, but not the Y747A mutant beta(3) cytoplasmic tail, linked to glutathione S-transferase, was demonstrated by surface plasmon resonance analysis and pull-down assays, respectively. Here, we demonstrate for the first time the in vivo relevance of this interaction by fluorescence resonance energy transfer between beta(3)-GFP and DsRed-talin fragment G. Further in vitro pull-down studies allowed us to map out the integrin-binding site within fragment G to a stretch of 130 residues (fragment J, residues 1984-2113) that also localized to focal adhesions. Finally, we show by a cell biology approach that this integrin-binding site within the talin rod domain is important for beta(3)-cytoskeletal interactions but does not participate in alpha(IIb)beta(3) activation.     

Localization of an integrin binding site to the C terminus of talin

Talin, consisting of a 47-kDa N-terminal head domain (residues 1-433) and a 190-kDa C-terminal rod domain (residues 434-2541), links integrins to the actin cytoskeleton. We previously reported that the binding stoichiometry of integrin alpha(IIb)beta(3):talin is approximately 2:1. More recently, an integrin binding site has been localized to the talin head domain. In the present study, we identified another integrin binding site at the C-terminal region of the talin rod domain. In a solid phase binding assay, RGD affinity-purified alpha(IIb)beta(3) bound in a dose-dependent manner to microtiter wells coated with the isolated 190-kDa proteolytic fragment of the talin rod domain. Additionally, alpha(IIb)beta(3) also bound to the talin rod domain captured by 8d4, an anti-talin monoclonal antibody. Polyclonal antibodies raised against a recombinant protein fragment corresponding to the entire talin rod domain (anti-talin-R) inhibited alpha(IIb)beta(3) binding to intact talin by approximately 50% but completely blocked alpha(IIb)beta(3) binding to the talin rod domain. To localize the integrin binding site, we examined alpha(IIb)beta(3) binding to recombinant polypeptide fragments corresponding to partial sequences of the talin rod domain. Whereas alpha(IIb)beta(3) bound effectively to talin-(1075-2541) and talin-(1984-2541), it failed to bind to talin-(434-1076) and talin-(434-1975). Furthermore, the binding of alpha(IIb)beta(3) to talin-(1984-2541) was inhibited by anti-talin-R. These results indicate that an integrin binding site is located within residues 1984-2541 of the talin rod domain. Thus, talin contains two integrin binding sites, one in the homologous FERM (band four-point-one, ezrin, radixin, moesin) domain and another near its C terminus. Because talin exists as an anti-parallel homodimer in focal adhesions, the two integrin binding sites in the adjacent talin molecules would be in close proximity with each other.     

Differences in regulation of Drosophila and vertebrate integrin affinity by talin

Integrin-mediated cell adhesion is essential for development of multicellular organisms. In worms, flies, and vertebrates, talin forms a physical link between integrin cytoplasmic domains and the actin cytoskeleton. Loss of either integrins or talin leads to similar phenotypes. In vertebrates, talin is also a key regulator of integrin affinity. We used a ligand-mimetic Fab fragment, TWOW-1, to assess talin's role in regulating Drosophila alphaPS2betaPS affinity. Depletion of cellular metabolic energy reduced TWOW-1 binding, suggesting alphaPS2betaPS affinity is an active process as it is for vertebrate integrins. In contrast to vertebrate integrins, neither talin knockdown by RNA interference nor talin head overexpression had a significant effect on TWOW-1 binding. Furthermore, replacement of the transmembrane or talin-binding cytoplasmic domains of alphaPS2betaPS with those of human alphaIIbbeta3 failed to enable talin regulation of TWOW-1 binding. However, substitution of the extracellular and transmembrane domains of alphaPS2betaPS with those of alphaIIbbeta3 resulted in a constitutively active integrin whose affinity was reduced by talin knockdown. Furthermore, wild-type alphaIIbbeta3 was activated by overexpression of Drosophila talin head domain. Thus, despite evolutionary conservation of talin's integrin/cytoskeleton linkage function, talin is not sufficient to regulate Drosophila alphaPS2betaPS affinity because of structural features inherent in the alphaPS2betaPS extracellular and/or transmembrane domains.     

Crystal structure of vinculin in complex with vinculin binding site 50 (VBS50), the integrin binding site 2 (IBS2) of talin

The cytoskeletal protein talin activates integrin receptors by binding of its FERM domain to the cytoplasmic tail of β‐integrin. Talin also couples integrins to the actin cytoskeleton, largely by binding to and activating the cytoskeletal protein vinculin, which binds to F‐actin through the agency of its five‐helix bundle tail (Vt) domain. Talin activates vinculin by means of buried amphipathic α‐helices coined vinculin binding sites (VBSs) that reside within numerous four‐ and five‐helix bundle domains that comprise the central talin rod, which are released from their buried locales by means of mechanical tension on the integrin:talin complex. In turn, these VBSs bind to the N‐terminal seven‐helix bundle (Vh1) domain of vinculin, creating an entirely new helix bundle that severs its head‐tail interactions. Interestingly, talin harbors a second integrin binding site coined IBS2 that consists of two five‐helix bundle domains that also contain a VBS (VBS50). Here we report the crystal structure of VBS50 in complex with vinculin at 2.3 Å resolution and show that intramolecular interactions of VBS50 within IBS2 are much more extensive versus its interactions with vinculin. Indeed, the IBS2‐vinculin interaction only occurs at physiological temperature and the affinity of VBS50 for vinculin is about 30 times less than other VBSs. The data support a model where integrin binding destabilizes IBS2 to allow it to bind to vinculin.     

Conformation, localization, and integrin binding of talin depend on its interaction with phosphoinositides

Talin is a structural component of focal adhesion sites and is thought to be engaged in multiple protein interactions at the cytoplasmic face of cell/matrix contacts. Talin is a major link between integrin and the actin cytoskeleton and was shown to play an important role in focal adhesion assembly. Consistent with the view that talin must be activated at these sites, we found that phosphatidylinositol 4-monophosphate and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI4,5P(2)) bound to talin in cells in suspension or at early stages of adhesion, respectively. When phosphoinositides were associated with phospholipid bilayer, talin/phosphoinositide association was restricted to PI4,5P(2). This association led to a conformational change of the protein. Moreover, the interaction between integrin and talin was greatly enhanced by PI4,5P(2)-induced talin activation. Finally, sequestration of PI4,5P(2) by a specific pleckstrin homology domain confirms that PI4,5P(2) is necessary for proper membrane localization of talin and that this localization is essential for the maintenance of focal adhesions. Our results support a model in which PI4,5P(2) exposes the integrin-binding site on talin. We propose that PI4,5P(2)-dependent signaling modulates assembly of focal adhesions by regulating integrin-talin complexes. These results demonstrate that activation of the integrin-binding activity of talin requires not only integrin engagement to the extracellular matrix but also the binding of PI4,5P(2) to talin, suggesting a possible role of lipid metabolism in organizing the sequential assembly of focal adhesion components.     

A structural mechanism of integrin alpha(IIb)beta(3) "inside-out" activation as regulated by its cytoplasmic face

Activation of the ligand binding function of integrin heterodimers requires transmission of an "inside-out" signal from their small intracellular segments to their large extracellular domains. The structure of the cytoplasmic domain of a prototypic integrin alpha(IIb)beta(3) has been solved by NMR and reveals multiple hydrophobic and electrostatic contacts within the membrane-proximal helices of its alpha and the beta cytoplasmic tails. The interface interactions are disrupted by point mutations or the cytoskeletal protein talin that are known to activate the receptor. These results provide a structural mechanism by which a handshake between the alpha and the beta cytoplasmic tails restrains the integrin in a resting state and unclasping of this interaction triggers the inside-out conformational signal that leads to receptor activation.