AFAP1‐AS1: A novel oncogenic long non‐coding RNA in human cancers

Long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs), a group of non‐protein‐coding RNAs with more than 200 nucleotides in length, are involved in multiple biological processes, such as the proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion. Moreover, numerous studies have shown that lncRNAs play important roles as oncogenes or tumour suppressor genes in human cancers. In this paper, we concentrate on actin filament‐associated protein 1‐antisense RNA 1 (AFAP1‐AS1), a well‐known long non‐coding RNA that is overexpressed in various tumour tissues and cell lines, including oesophageal cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer, biliary tract cancer and gastric cancer. Moreover, high expression of AFAP1‐AS1 was associated with the clinicopathological features and cancer progression. In this review, we sum up the current studies on the characteristics of AFAP1‐AS1 in the biological function and mechanism of human cancers.     

Long non‐coding RNA NR2F1‐AS1 promoted proliferation and migration yet suppressed apoptosis of thyroid cancer cells through regulating miRNA‐338‐3p/CCND1 axis

Thyroid cancer (TC) is a prevalent endocrine malignant cancer whose pathogenic mechanism remains unclear. The aim of the study was to investigate the roles of long non‐coding RNA (lncRNA) NR2F1‐AS1/miRNA‐338‐3P/CCND1 axis in TC progression. Differentially expressed lncRNAs and mRNAs in TC tissues were screened out and visualized by R program. Relative expression of NR2F1‐AS1, miRNA‐338‐3p and cyclin D1 (CCND1) was determined by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction. In addition, Western blot analysis was adopted for evaluation of protein expression of CCND1. Targeted relationships between NR2F1‐AS1 and miRNA‐338‐3p, as well as miRNA‐338‐3p and CCND1 were predicted using bioinformatics analysis and validated by dual‐luciferase reporter gene assay. Besides, tumour xenograft assay was adopted for verification of the role of NR2F1‐AS1 in TC in vivo. NR2F1‐AS1 and CCND1 were overexpressed, whereas miRNA‐338‐3p was down‐regulated in TC tissues and cell lines. Down‐regulation of NR2F1‐AS1 and CCND1 suppressed proliferation and migration of TC cells yet greatly enhanced cell apoptotic rate. Silence of NR2F1‐AS1 significantly suppressed TC tumorigenesis in vivo. NR2F1‐AS1 sponged miRNA‐338‐3p to up‐regulate CCND1 expression to promote TC progression. Our study demonstrated that up‐regulation of NR2F1‐AS1 accelerated TC progression through regulating miRNA‐338‐3P/CCND1 axis.     

ZEB1‐AS1: A crucial cancer‐related long non‐coding RNA

Long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) recently emerge as a novel class of non‐coding RNAs (ncRNAs) with larger than 200 nucleotides in length. Due to lack an obvious open reading frame, lncRNAs have no or limited protein‐coding potential. To date, accumulating evidence indicates the vital regulatory function of lncRNAs in pathological processes of human diseases, especially in carcinogenesis and development. Deregulation of lncRNAs not only alters cellular biological behavior, such as proliferation, migration and invasion, but also represents the poor clinical outcomes. Zinc finger E‐box binding homeobox 1 antisense 1 (ZEB1‐AS1), an outstanding cancer‐related lncRNA, is identified as an oncogenic regulator in diverse malignancies. Dysregulation of ZEB1‐AS1 has been demonstrated to exhibit a pivotal role in tumorigenesis and progression, suggesting its potential clinical value as a promising biomarker or therapeutic target for cancers. In this review, we make a summary on the current findings regarding the biological functions, underlying mechanisms and clinical significance of ZEB1‐AS1 in cancer progression.     

Long non‐coding RNA F11‐AS1 inhibits HBV‐related hepatocellular carcinoma progression by regulating NR1I3 via binding to microRNA‐211‐5p

Long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) could regulate growth and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we aimed to investigate the mechanism of lncRNA F11‐AS1 in hepatitis B virus (HBV)–related HCC. The relation of lncRNA F11‐AS1 expression in HBV‐related HCC tissues to prognosis was analysed in silico. Stably HBV‐expressing HepG2.2.15 cells were established to explore the regulation of lncRNA F11‐AS1 by HBx protein, as well as to study the effects of overexpressed lncRNA F11‐AS1 on proliferation, migration, invasion and apoptosis in vitro. Subsequently, the underlying interactions and roles of lncRNA F11‐AS1/miR‐211‐5p/NR1I3 axis in HBV‐related HCC were investigated. Additionally, the influence of lncRNA F11‐AS1 and miR‐211‐5p on tumour growth and metastasis capacity of HepG2.2.15 cells were studied on tumour‐bearing nude mice. Poor expression of lncRNA F11‐AS1 was correlated with poor prognosis in patients with HBV‐related HCC, and its down‐regulation was caused by the HBx protein. lncRNA F11‐AS1 was proved to up‐regulate the NR1I3 expression by binding to miR‐211‐5p. Overexpression of lncRNA F11‐AS1 reduced the proliferation, migration and invasion, yet induced apoptosis of HepG2.2.15 cells in vitro, which could be abolished by overexpression of miR‐211‐5p. Additionally, either lncRNA F11‐AS1 overexpression or miR‐211‐5p inhibition attenuated the tumour growth and metastasis capacity of HepG2.2.15 cells in vivo. Collectively, lncRNA F11‐AS1 acted as a modulator of miR‐211‐5p to positively regulate the expression of NR1I3, and the lncRNA F11‐AS1/miR‐211‐5p/NR1I3 axis participated in HBV‐related HCC progression via interference with the cellular physiology of HCC.     

Down‐regulated lncRNA SBF2‐AS1 in M2 macrophage‐derived exosomes elevates miR‐122‐5p to restrict XIAP,thereby limiting pancreatic cancer development

Evidence has indicated that M2 macrophages promote the progression of cancers, but few focus on the ability of M2 macrophage‐derived exosomes in pancreatic cancer (PC). This study aims to explore how M2 macrophages affect malignant phenotypes of PC through regulating long non‐coding RNA SET‐binding factor 2 antisense RNA 1 (lncRNA SBF2‐AS1)/microRNA‐122‐5p (miR‐122‐5p)/X‐linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) axis. THP‐1 cells were transformed into M1 macrophages by lipopolysaccharide and interferon‐γ treatment, and into M2 macrophages after interleukin‐4 treatment. The PANC‐1 PC cell line with the largest lncRNA SBF2‐AS1 expression was selected, and M2 macrophage‐derived exosomes were isolated and identified. A number of assays were applied for the examination of lncRNA SBF2‐AS1 expression, PC cell biological functions and subcellular localization of lncRNA SBF2‐AS1. XIAP expression was detected, along with the interaction among lncRNA SBF2‐AS1, miR‐122‐5p and XIAP. M2 macrophage exosomal lncRNA SBF2‐AS1 expression's effects on the tumorigenic ability of PANC‐1 cells in nude mice were also investigated. M2 macrophage‐derived exosomes promoted progression of PC cells. Overexpressed lncRNA SBF2‐AS1 promoted progression of PC cells. LncRNA SBF2‐AS1 was found to act as a competing endogenous RNA to repress miR‐122‐5p and up‐regulate XIAP. Constrained lncRNA SBF2‐AS1 in M2 macrophage‐derived exosomes contributed to restraining tumorigenic ability of PC cells. Collectively, our study reveals that constrained lncRNA SBF2‐AS1 in M2 macrophage‐derived exosomes increases miR‐122‐5p expression to restrain XIAP expression, which further inhibits PC progression.     

HES6 promotes prostate cancer aggressiveness independently of Notch signalling

Notch signalling is implicated in the pathogenesis of a variety of cancers, but its role in prostate cancer is poorly understood. However, selected Notch pathway members are overrepresented in high‐grade prostate cancers. We comprehensively profiled Notch pathway components in prostate cells and found prostate cancer‐specific up‐regulation of NOTCH3 and HES6. Their expression was particularly high in androgen responsive lines. Up‐ and down‐regulating Notch in these cells modulated expression of canonical Notch targets, HES1 and HEY1, which could also be induced by androgen. Surprisingly, androgen treatment also suppressed Notch receptor expression, suggesting that androgens can activate Notch target genes in a receptor‐independent manner. Using a Notch‐sensitive Recombination signal binding protein for immunoglobulin kappa J region (RBPJ) reporter assay, we found that basal levels of Notch signalling were significantly lower in prostate cancer cells compared to benign cells. Accordingly pharmacological Notch pathway blockade did not inhibit cancer cell growth or viability. In contrast to canonical Notch targets, HES6, a HES family member known to antagonize Notch signalling, was not regulated by Notch signalling, but relied instead on androgen levels, both in cultured cells and in human cancer tissues. When engineered into prostate cancer cells, reduced levels of HES6 resulted in reduced cancer cell invasion and clonogenic growth. By molecular profiling, we identified potential roles for HES6 in regulating hedgehog signalling, apoptosis and cell migration. Our results did not reveal any cell‐autonomous roles for canonical Notch signalling in prostate cancer. However, the results do implicate HES6 as a promoter of prostate cancer progression.     

Regucalcin is under‐expressed in human breast and prostate cancers: Effect of sex steroid hormones

Regucalcin plays an important role in maintenance of intracellular Ca²⁺ homeostasis, suppresses cell proliferation, inhibits expression of oncogenes, and increases the expression of tumour suppressor genes. This suggests that regucalcin functions may be altered in cancer tissues. In this study the regucalcin expression in breast and prostate cancer cases was analysed by RT‐PCR and immunohistochemistry showing that the mRNA and/or protein are under‐expressed in these tumors. The effect of sex steroid hormones on regucalcin expression in breast and prostate cancer cells was determined by real‐time PCR. MCF‐7 and LNCaP cells were stimulated with 0, 1, and 10 nM of 17β‐estradiol (E₂) or 5α‐dihydrotestosterone (DHT), respectively, for 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. MCF‐7 cells were also stimulated with E₂ conjugated to BSA (E₂‐BSA). To explore the mechanisms underlying the sex steroid regulation of regucalcin expression, control treatments with ICI 182,780, flutamide and cyclohexamide were carried out. E₂ effects regulating regucalcin expression were not abrogated in the presence of ICI 182,780, and were similar to those observed with E₂‐BSA, which suggests the involvement of a membrane‐bound estrogen receptor. In LNCaP cells, DHT down‐regulated regucalcin expression, an effect inhibited by the presence of both flutamide and cyclohexamide, suggesting the involvement of androgen receptor and de novo protein synthesis. The loss of regucalcin expression in breast and prostate cancer cases and the regulation of its expression by sex steroid hormones suggest that it may be associated with development and progression of these human tumors. J. Cell. Biochem. 107: 667–676, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

The lncRNA HNF1A‐AS1 is a negative prognostic factor and promotes tumorigenesis in osteosarcoma

Recent studies have revealed that long noncoding RNA HNF1A‐antisense 1 (HNF1A‐AS1) plays an important role in the development of several human malignancy entities. However, the expression and function of HNF1A‐AS1 in the carcinogenesis and development of osteosarcoma remains unknown. In this study, we detected the HNF1A‐AS1 levels in human osteosarcoma tissues and cell lines by quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR), and investigated its role in osteosarcoma by using in vitro assays. Our study showed that HNF1A‐AS1 expression was significantly up‐regulated in human osteosarcoma tissues and cell lines compared with their normal counterparts, and its expression level was positively correlated with the distance metastasis (P = 0.009) and tumour stage (P = 0.019). Moreover, Kaplan–Meier curves with the log‐rank test showed that higher expression of HNF1A‐AS1 conferred a significantly poorer survival and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that HNF1A‐AS1 was an independent risk factor of overall survival. In addition, the expression of HNF1A‐AS1 in serum is correlated with patients’ status and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated that HNF1A‐AS1 could distinguish patients with osteosarcoma from healthy individuals (the area under curve 0.849, P < 0.001). Furthermore, in vitro knockdown of HNF1A‐AS1 by siRNA significantly inhibited cell proliferation and G₁/S transition, and suppressed migration and invasion by reducing the epithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) program in osteosarcoma cells. Taken together, our data suggested that HNF1A‐AS1 is a novel molecule involved in osteosarcoma progression, which may provide as a potential diagnostic, prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target.     

LncRNA MEG3 inhibits the progression of prostate cancer by modulating miR‐9‐5p/QKI‐5 axis

This study was designed to detecting the influences of lncRNA MEG3 in prostate cancer. Aberrant lncRNAs expression profiles of prostate cancer were screened by microarray analysis. The qRT‐PCR and Western blot were employed to investigating the expression levels of lncRNA MEG3, miR‐9‐5p and QKI‐5. The luciferase reporter assay was utilized to testifying the interactions relationship among these molecules. Applying CCK‐8 assay, wound healing assay, transwell assay and flow cytometry in turn, the cell proliferation, migration and invasion abilities as well as apoptosis were measured respectively. LncRNA MEG3 was a down‐regulated lncRNA in prostate cancer tissues and cells and could inhibit the expression of miR‐9‐5p, whereas miR‐9‐5p down‐regulated QKI‐5 expression. Overexpressed MEG3 and QKI‐5 could decrease the abilities of proliferation, migration and invasion in prostate cancer cells effectively and increased the apoptosis rate. On the contrary, miR‐9‐5p mimics presented an opposite tendency in prostate cancer cells. Furthermore, MEG3 inhibited tumour growth and up‐regulated expression of QKI‐5 in vivo. LncRNA MEG3 was a down‐regulated lncRNA in prostate cancer and impacted the abilities of cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and cell apoptosis rate, this regulation relied on regulating miR‐9‐5p and its targeting gene QKI‐5.     

AT‐101 (R‐(−)‐gossypol acetic acid) enhances the effectiveness of androgen deprivation therapy in the VCaP prostate cancer model

Prostate cancer remains a leading cause of cancer death in American men. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the most common treatment for advanced prostate cancer patients; however, ADT fails in nearly all cases resulting in castration resistant or androgen‐insensitive (AI) disease. In many cases, this progression results from dysregulation of the pro‐survival Bcl‐2 family proteins. Inhibition of pro‐survival Bcl‐2 family proteins, therefore, may be an effective strategy to delay the onset of AI disease. Gossypol, a small molecule inhibitor of pro‐survival Bcl‐2 family proteins, has been demonstrated to inhibit AI prostate cancer growth. The apoptotic effect of gossypol, however, has been demonstrated to be attenuated by the presence of androgen in a prostate cancer xenograft mouse model (Vertebral Cancer of Prostate [VCaP]) treated with AT‐101 (R‐(?)‐gossypol acetic acid). This study was undertaken to better understand the in vitro effects of androgen receptor (AR) on AT‐101‐induced apoptosis. VCaP cells treated with AT‐101 demonstrated an increase in apoptosis and downregulation of Bcl‐2 pro‐survival proteins. Upon AR activation in combination with AT‐101 treatment, apoptosis is reduced, cell survival increases, and caspase activation is attenuated. Akt and X inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) are downregulated in the presence of AT‐101, and AR stimulation rescues protein expression. Combination treatment of bicalutamide and AT‐101 increases apoptosis by reducing the expression of these pro‐survival proteins. These data suggest that combination therapy of AT‐101 and ADT may further delay the onset of AI disease, resulting in prolonged progression‐free survival of prostate cancer patients. J. Cell. Biochem. 110: 1187–1194, 2010. Published 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Mechanisms of prostate cancer cell survival after inhibition of AR expression

Recent reports have shown that the AR is the key determinant of the molecular changes required for driving prostate cancer cells from an androgen‐dependent to an androgen‐independent or androgen depletion‐independent (ADI) state. Several recent publications suggest that down‐regulation of AR expression should therefore be considered the principal strategy for the treatment of ADI prostate cancer. However, no valid data is available about how androgen‐dependent prostate cancer cells respond to apoptosis‐inducing drugs after knocking down AR expression and whether prostate cancer cells escape apoptosis after inhibition of AR expression. This review will focus on mechanisms of prostate cancer cell survival after inhibition of AR activity mediated either by androgen depletion or by targeting the expression of AR by siRNA. We have shown that knocking down AR expression by siRNA induced PI3K‐independent activation of Akt, which was mediated by calcium/calmodulin‐dependent kinase II (CaMKII). We also showed that the expression of CaMKII genes is under AR control: active AR in the presence of androgens inhibits CaMKII gene expression whereas inhibition of AR activity results in an elevated level of kinase activity and in enhanced expression of CaMKII genes. This in turn activates the anti‐apoptotic PI3K/Akt pathways. CaMKII also express anti‐apoptotic activity that is independent from the Akt pathway. This may therefore be an important mechanism by which prostate cancer cells escape apoptosis after androgen depletion or knocking down AR expression. In addition, we have found that there is another way to escape cell death after AR inhibition: DNA damaging agents cannot fully activate p53 in the absence of AR and as a result p53 down stream targets, for example, microRNA‐34, cannot be activated and induce apoptosis. This implies that there may be a need for re‐evaluation of the therapeutic approaches to human prostate cancer. J. Cell. Biochem. 106: 363–371, 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Identification of castration‐resistant prostate cancer‐related hub genes using weighted gene co‐expression network analysis

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in urinary system and brings heavy burdens in men. We downloaded gene expression profile of mRNA and related clinical data of GSE70768 data set from public database. Weighted gene co‐expression network analysis (WGCNA) was used to identify the relationships between gene modules and clinical features, as well as the candidate genes. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) analyses were developed to investigate the potential functions of related hub genes. Importantly, basic experiments were performed to verify the relationship between hub genes and the phenotype previously identified. Lastly, copy number variation (CNV) analysis was conducted to explore the genetical alteration. WGCNA identified that black module was the most relevant module which was tightly related to castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) phenotype. KEGG and GO analysis results revealed genes in black module were mainly related to RNA splicing. Additionally, 9 genes were chosen as hub genes and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2/B1 (HNRNPA2B1), golgin A8 family member B (GOLGA8B) and mitogen‐activated protein kinase 8 interacting protein 3 (MAPK8IP3) were identified to be associated with PCa progression and prognosis. Moreover, all above three genes were highly expressed in CRPC‐like cells and their suppression led to hindered cell proliferation in vitro. Finally, CNV analysis found that amplification was the main type of alteration of the 3 hub genes. Our study found that HNRNPA2B1, GOLGA8B and MAPK8IP3 were identified to be tightly associated with tumour progression and prognosis, and further researches are needed before clinical application.